arxiv: 2512.00543 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-29 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Hybridization of pulse and continuous-wave based optical quantum computation

Tatsuki Sonoyama , Tomoki Sano , Takumi Suzuki , Kazuma Takahashi , Takefumi Nomura , Akito Kawasaki , Takahiro Kashiwazaki , Asuka Inoue

show 8 more authors

Takeshi Umeki Masahiro Yabuno Shigehito Miki Hirotaka Terai Kan Takase Warit Asavanant Mamoru Endo Akira Furusawa

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords hybrid architectureoptical quantum computationcontinuous-variablenon-Gaussian stateshomodyne measurementcluster statespulsed lightCW light

0 comments

The pith

A hybrid pulsed and continuous-wave architecture for optical quantum computation generates non-Gaussian states with short wavepackets while enabling low-loss CW processing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper is trying to establish that a hybrid architecture combining pulsed light for non-Gaussian state generation and continuous-wave light for cluster-state processing and homodyne measurements enables ultrafast quantum computation with short wavepackets while maintaining low losses. Sympathetic readers would care if this resolves the trade-off between speed and loss in optical quantum systems, paving the way for scalable fault-tolerant computation. The authors support this with a demonstration of ultrafast homodyne measurement on pulsed single-photon states yielding a negative Wigner function value.

Core claim

The central discovery is a pulse-CW hybrid architecture in continuous-variable measurement-based optical quantum computation, where pulsed light generates the necessary non-Gaussian states for universality and fault-tolerance, while CW light operates the quantum processors including cluster states and homodyne systems, enabling both ultrafast computation with short wavepackets and low-loss operations.

What carries the argument

The hybrid architecture that uses pulsed light for non-Gaussian state generation and CW light for cluster-state processing and homodyne detection.

If this is right

This enables generation of quantum states with shorter optical wavepackets for ultrafast computation.
Low-loss manipulation and measurement of these states becomes possible in the CW processor.
The architecture supports high-speed optical quantum information processing as a core technology.
Proof-of-principle is shown through successful ultrafast homodyne on pulsed single-photon states with negative Wigner function.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This hybridization could allow optical systems to optimize separately for state generation speed and processing stability.
Similar pulse-CW combinations might extend to other continuous-variable protocols like error correction.
Integration challenges like synchronization could be tested by varying the pulse repetition rate in follow-up setups.

Load-bearing premise

Pulsed-generated non-Gaussian states can be efficiently coupled into and manipulated within a CW-based cluster-state processor without prohibitive losses or timing mismatches.

What would settle it

An experiment showing that coupling the pulsed single-photon state into the CW homodyne system results in W(0,0) approaching zero due to losses or timing mismatches would falsify efficient hybridization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.00543 by Akira Furusawa, Akito Kawasaki, Asuka Inoue, Hirotaka Terai, Kan Takase, Kazuma Takahashi, Mamoru Endo, Masahiro Yabuno, Shigehito Miki, Takahiro Kashiwazaki, Takefumi Nomura, Takeshi Umeki, Takumi Suzuki, Tatsuki Sonoyama, Tomoki Sano, Warit Asavanant.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Schematic diagram of the experimental system. IM: Intensity Modulator, WS: Waveshaper, SHG: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (a) The heatmap of homodyne measurement signals. The colorbar of the figure shows the relation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We propose a pulse and continuous wave (CW) hybrid architecture of continuous-variable measurement-based optical quantum computation utilizing the strengths of both pulsed and CW light. In this architecture, input and ancillary non-Gaussian quantum states necessary for fault-tolerance and universality are generated with pulsed light, whereas quantum processors including continuous-variable cluster states and homodyne measurement systems are operated with CW light. This architecture is expected to enable both generation of quantum states with shorter optical wavepackets for ultrafast computation and low-loss manipulation and measurement of these states. In this study, as a proof-of-principle, an ultrafast homodyne measurement using a CW local oscillator was performed on single-photon states generated with pulsed light. The measured single-photon state's temporal width was around 70 ps and the value of the Wigner function at the origin was $W(0,0) = -0.153\pm0.003$, which is highly non-classical. This will be a core technology for high-speed optical quantum information processing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Hybrid pulsed-CW architecture for CV quantum computing with a proof-of-principle homodyne experiment but untested coupling details.

read the letter

The punchline on arXiv:2512.00543 is that the authors lay out a hybrid pulsed and continuous-wave architecture for measurement-based continuous-variable quantum computation, and they demonstrate a core component by doing homodyne detection with a CW local oscillator on single-photon states generated by pulsed light. What stands out as new is the specific combination: pulsed sources for creating the non-Gaussian inputs with shorter optical wavepackets that could enable ultrafast operations, paired with CW light for building and measuring the cluster states in a low-loss way. The experiment achieves a single-photon temporal width of around 70 ps and measures W(0,0) = -0.153 ± 0.003, which is a solid indication of non-classicality and shows that the detection interface can bridge the two regimes. The paper does well by grounding the proposal in standard quantum optics and delivering a reproducible experimental result with a clear error bar. It focuses on a real practical issue in scaling optical quantum computers rather than abstract theory. The soft spots come in the unaddressed aspects of the hybrid connection. While the architecture is expected to allow low-loss manipulation, there is no data here on insertion losses when coupling the pulsed states into the CW processor, no analysis of timing synchronization requirements, and no test of mode matching or polarization alignment. The proof-of-principle stops at the homodyne step, so the claims about efficient integration and fault-tolerant scaling rest on assumptions that are not yet checked experimentally. The stress-test concern about these interface issues is accurate based on what is presented. This kind of work is for researchers already working in continuous-variable optical quantum computation who are dealing with hardware choices between pulsed and CW systems. A reader who needs ideas for combining generation and processing technologies would find it relevant. The paper engages honestly with the literature and the experimental challenges, making it suitable for peer review. I recommend sending it out rather than a desk reject, as the idea and the initial experiment warrant discussion and feedback from the community.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a hybrid pulse and continuous-wave (CW) architecture for continuous-variable measurement-based optical quantum computation. Non-Gaussian states (e.g., single-photon or cat states) are generated using pulsed light with short wavepackets, while the cluster-state processors and homodyne measurements operate with CW light. As a proof-of-principle, the authors demonstrate ultrafast homodyne detection using a CW local oscillator on pulsed single-photon states with ~70 ps temporal width, reporting W(0,0) = -0.153 ± 0.003.

Significance. If the hybrid interface can be realized with acceptable losses and synchronization, the approach could combine ultrafast state generation with the stability and low-loss advantages of CW systems for scalable CV cluster-state computation. The experimental result confirms non-classicality of the pulsed state under CW detection and supports the core technology claim, but the overall significance for fault-tolerant quantum computation depends on quantifying the untested coupling between pulsed sources and CW processors.

major comments (2)

[Hybrid architecture proposal] The hybrid architecture section does not include quantitative loss budgets, mode-matching tolerances, or timing synchronization analysis for injecting pulsed non-Gaussian states into the CW cluster-state resource. This directly impacts the central claim of 'low-loss manipulation' and must be addressed to support scalability arguments.
[Experimental demonstration] The proof-of-principle experiment (CW-LO homodyne on pulsed single-photon states) demonstrates non-classicality but does not test or quantify the full hybrid link, including insertion loss, polarization/timing alignment, or coupling into a CW-operated cluster state. This leaves the weakest assumption unverified.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract and experimental results] Clarify in the abstract and introduction whether the reported W(0,0) value accounts for any detection inefficiencies or if it is raw data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the hybrid architecture and clarify the scope of the experimental demonstration.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Hybrid architecture proposal] The hybrid architecture section does not include quantitative loss budgets, mode-matching tolerances, or timing synchronization analysis for injecting pulsed non-Gaussian states into the CW cluster-state resource. This directly impacts the central claim of 'low-loss manipulation' and must be addressed to support scalability arguments.

Authors: We agree that quantitative estimates strengthen the scalability discussion. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection providing order-of-magnitude loss budgets drawn from typical values for fiber coupling (∼1–2 dB), spatial mode matching with lenses and pinholes (∼0.5 dB), and timing synchronization using commercial delay generators (jitter <10 ps). These estimates indicate that total interface loss can remain below 3 dB, compatible with current fault-tolerance thresholds for small-scale CV cluster states. A full end-to-end numerical simulation of error accumulation is beyond the present scope and will be pursued separately. revision: yes
Referee: [Experimental demonstration] The proof-of-principle experiment (CW-LO homodyne on pulsed single-photon states) demonstrates non-classicality but does not test or quantify the full hybrid link, including insertion loss, polarization/timing alignment, or coupling into a CW-operated cluster state. This leaves the weakest assumption unverified.

Authors: The reported experiment is explicitly a proof-of-principle for the critical interface component—ultrafast homodyne detection of pulsed non-Gaussian states using a CW local oscillator—yielding W(0,0) = −0.153 ± 0.003. We acknowledge that the complete hybrid link (insertion loss, polarization/timing alignment, and direct coupling into a CW cluster-state processor) has not been experimentally realized here and remains part of the proposed architecture. We have revised the text to state this scope limitation more explicitly and to emphasize that the demonstrated non-classicality under CW detection validates the core detection technology. Full integration experiments are planned as follow-on work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in hybrid pulsed-CW quantum computation proposal

full rationale

The paper proposes a hybrid architecture where pulsed light generates non-Gaussian states (e.g., single-photon states with ~70 ps wavepackets) and CW light operates the cluster-state processor and homodyne measurements. The central claim is an expectation that this enables shorter wavepackets for ultrafast computation and low-loss manipulation. The proof-of-principle is an experimental homodyne detection yielding W(0,0) = -0.153 ± 0.003, which is a direct measurement of non-classicality using standard quantum optics techniques. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the architecture choice rests on established regime-specific advantages rather than tautological derivation. The result is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from prior self-work in a circular way.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal relies on standard assumptions of continuous-variable quantum optics and linear optical networks; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard assumptions of continuous-variable quantum optics and linear optical networks hold for the hybrid interface.
Invoked implicitly when claiming low-loss manipulation and ultrafast computation are simultaneously achievable.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5542 in / 1226 out tokens · 55841 ms · 2026-05-17T03:04:50.187956+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We propose a pulse and continuous wave (CW) hybrid architecture of continuous-variable measurement-based optical quantum computation utilizing the strengths of both pulsed and CW light. ... The measured single-photon state’s temporal width was around 70 ps and the value of the Wigner function at the origin was W(0,0) = −0.153±0.003
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArrowOfTime.lean arrow_from_z unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

In time-domain multiplexing techniques, the wave packet width determines the upper limit of the quantum computing clock frequency

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Temporal-mode continuous-variable cluster states using linear optics

Nicolas C. Menicucci. “Temporal-mode continuous-variable cluster states using linear optics”. In: Phys. Rev. A 83 (6 June 2011), p. 062314.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.062314.URL: https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.062314

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.83.062314.url: 2011
[2]

Arbitrarily Large Continuous-Variable Cluster States from a Single Quantum Nondemolition Gate

Nicolas C. Menicucci, Xian Ma, and Timothy C. Ralph. “Arbitrarily Large Continuous-Variable Cluster States from a Single Quantum Nondemolition Gate”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (25 June 2010), p. 250503. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.250503 .URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.104.250503

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.250503 2010
[3]

Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state

Warit Asavanant et al. “Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state”. In: Science 366.6463 (2019), pp. 373–376.DOI: 10 . 1126 / science . aay2645. eprint: https : //www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aay2645 .URL: https://www. science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aay2645

work page doi:10.1126/science.aay2645 2019
[4]

Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state

Mikkel V . Larsen et al. “Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state”. In: Science 366.6463 (2019), pp. 369–372.DOI: 10 . 1126 / science . aay4354. eprint: https : / / www . science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aay4354 .URL: https://www.science. org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aay4354

work page doi:10.1126/science.aay4354 2019
[5]

Deterministic multi-mode gates on a scalable photonic quantum computing platform

Mikkel V . Larsen et al. “Deterministic multi-mode gates on a scalable photonic quantum computing platform”. In: Nature Physics 17.9 (Sept. 2021), pp. 1018–1023.ISSN: 1745-2481.DOI: 10.1038/ s41567-021-01296-y.URL:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01296-y

work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01296-y 2021
[6]

A full-stack analog optical quantum computing platform with one hundred inputs

Shota Yokoyama et al. Full-stack Analog Optical Quantum Computer with A Hundred Inputs. 2025. arXiv:2506.16147 [quant-ph].URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16147

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[7]

Encoding a qubit in an oscillator

Daniel Gottesman, Alexei Kitaev, and John Preskill. “Encoding a qubit in an oscillator”. In: Physical Review A 64.1 (June 2001).ISSN: 1094-1622.DOI: 10.1103/physreva.64.012310 . URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012310

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.64.012310 2001
[9]

Efficient Classical Simulation of Continuous Variable Quantum Information Processes

Stephen D. Bartlett et al. “Efficient Classical Simulation of Continuous Variable Quantum Information Processes”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (9 Feb. 2002), p. 097904.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88. 097904.URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.097904

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88 2002
[10]

Mamoru Endo et al.High-Rate Four Photon Subtraction from Squeezed Vacuum: Preparing Cat State for Optical Quantum Computation

work page
[11]

arXiv:2502.08952 [quant-ph].URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08952. 8

work page arXiv
[12]

Integrated photonic source of Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill qubits

M. V . Larsen et al. “Integrated photonic source of Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill qubits”. In: Nature 642.8068 (June 2025), pp. 587–591.ISSN: 1476-4687.DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09044-5 . URL:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09044-5

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09044-5 2025
[13]

Generating Optical Schr ¨odinger Kittens for Quantum Information Pro- cessing

Alexei Ourjoumtsev et al. “Generating Optical Schr ¨odinger Kittens for Quantum Information Pro- cessing”. In: Science 312.5770 (2006), pp. 83–86.DOI: 10.1126/science.1122858 . eprint: https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1122858 .URL: https: //www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1122858

work page doi:10.1126/science.1122858 2006
[15]

Non-Gaussian quantum states of a multimode light field

Young-Sik Ra et al. “Non-Gaussian quantum states of a multimode light field”. In: Nature Physics 16.2 (Feb. 2020), pp. 144–147.ISSN: 1745-2481.DOI: 10.1038/s41567-019-0726-y .URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0726-y

work page doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0726-y 2020
[16]

Generation of three-dimensional cluster entangled state

Chan Roh et al. “Generation of three-dimensional cluster entangled state”. In:Nature Photonics 19.5 (May 2025), pp. 526–532.ISSN: 1749-4893.DOI: 10 . 1038 / s41566 - 025 - 01631 - 2.URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-025-01631-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41566-025-01631-2 2025
[17]

State-independent quantum state tomography by photon-number-resolving mea- surements

Rajveer Nehra et al. “State-independent quantum state tomography by photon-number-resolving mea- surements”. In: Optica 6.10 (Oct. 2019), pp. 1356–1360.DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.6.001356.URL: https://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI=optica-6-10-1356

work page doi:10.1364/optica.6.001356.url: 2019
[18]

A quantum-bit encoding converter

Tom Darras et al. “A quantum-bit encoding converter”. In:Nature Photonics 17.2 (Feb. 2023), pp. 165– 170.ISSN: 1749-4893.DOI: 10.1038/s41566-022-01117-5.URL: https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41566-022-01117-5

work page doi:10.1038/s41566-022-01117-5.url: 2023
[19]

Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating light

Shunya Konno et al. “Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating light”. In: Science 383.6680 (2024), pp. 289–293.DOI: 10.1126/science.adk7560 . eprint: https: //www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.adk7560 .URL: https://www. science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.adk7560

work page doi:10.1126/science.adk7560 2024
[20]

Sequential and Programmable Squeezing Gates for Optical Non-Gaussian Input States

Takato Yoshida et al. “Sequential and Programmable Squeezing Gates for Optical Non-Gaussian Input States”. In: PRX Quantum 6 (1 Jan. 2025), p. 010311.DOI: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.6.010311. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.6.010311

work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6.010311 2025
[21]

Generation of multi-photon Fock states at telecommunication wavelength using picosecond pulsed light

Tatsuki Sonoyama et al. “Generation of multi-photon Fock states at telecommunication wavelength using picosecond pulsed light”. In:Opt. Express 32.18 (Aug. 2024), pp. 32387–32395.DOI: 10.1364/ OE.530164.URL: https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe- 32- 18- 32387

work page 2024
[22]

Experimental generation of multi-photon Fock states

Merlin Cooper et al. “Experimental generation of multi-photon Fock states”. In:Opt. Express 21.5 (Mar. 2013), pp. 5309–5317.DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.005309 .URL: https://opg.optica.org/ oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-5-5309

work page doi:10.1364/oe.21.005309 2013
[23]

High production rate of single-photon and two-photon Fock states for quantum state engineering

Martin Bouillard et al. “High production rate of single-photon and two-photon Fock states for quantum state engineering”. In: Opt. Express 27.3 (Feb. 2019), pp. 3113–3120.DOI: 10 . 1364 / OE . 27 . 003113.URL:https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-27-3-3113

work page 2019
[24]

Non-Gaussian-state generation with time-gated photon detection

Tatsuki Sonoyama et al. “Non-Gaussian-state generation with time-gated photon detection”. In: Phys. Rev. Res. 5 (3 Sept. 2023), p. 033156.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.033156 . URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.033156. 9

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.033156 2023
[25]

Atia and D

Akito Kawasaki et al. “Broadband generation and tomography of non-Gaussian states for ultra-fast optical quantum processors”. In: Nature Communications 15.1 (Nov. 2024), p. 9075.ISSN: 2041-1723. DOI: 10.1038/s41467- 024- 53408- w .URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467- 024-53408-w

work page doi:10.1038/s41467- 2024
[26]

Fault-Tolerant Continuous-Variable Measurement-based Quantum Computation Architecture

Mikkel V . Larsen et al. “Fault-Tolerant Continuous-Variable Measurement-based Quantum Computation Architecture”. In: PRX Quantum 2 (3 Aug. 2021), p. 030325.DOI: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2. 030325.URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.030325

work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2 2021
[27]

Inoue et al

A. Inoue et al. “Toward a multi-core ultra-fast optical quantum processor: 43-GHz bandwidth real- time amplitude measurement of 5-dB squeezed light using modularized optical parametric amplifier with 5G technology”. In: Applied Physics Letters 122.10 (Mar. 2023), p. 104001.ISSN: 0003-6951. DOI: 10 . 1063 / 5 . 0137641. eprint: https : / / pubs . aip . org...

work page doi:10.1063/5.0137641/19823529/104001 2023
[28]

Real-time observation of picosecond-timescale optical quantum entanglement towards ultrafast quantum information processing

Akito Kawasaki et al. “Real-time observation of picosecond-timescale optical quantum entanglement towards ultrafast quantum information processing”. In:Nature Photonics 19.3 (Mar. 2025), pp. 271–276. ISSN: 1749-4893.DOI: 10.1038/s41566- 024- 01589- 7 .URL: https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41566-024-01589-7

work page doi:10.1038/s41566- 2025
[30]

Tomography of a High-Purity Narrowband Photon from a Transient Atomic Collective Excitation

A. MacRae et al. “Tomography of a High-Purity Narrowband Photon from a Transient Atomic Collective Excitation”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (3 July 2012), p. 033601.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109. 033601.URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.033601

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109 2012
[31]

Iterative maximum-likelihood reconstruction in quantum homodyne tomography

A I Lvovsky. “Iterative maximum-likelihood reconstruction in quantum homodyne tomography”. In: Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics 6.6 (May 2004), S556.DOI: 10.1088/ 1464-4266/6/6/014.URL:https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1464-4266/6/6/014

work page doi:10.1088/1464-4266/6/6/014 2004
[32]

Heralded Generation of Ultrafast Single Photons in Pure Quantum States

Peter J. Mosley et al. “Heralded Generation of Ultrafast Single Photons in Pure Quantum States”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (13 Apr. 2008), p. 133601.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.133601 . URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.133601. 10 Measurement-based quantum processor Non-Gaussian state generator squeezer PNRD delay homodyne pulse light C...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.133601 2008