arxiv: 2512.04028 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-03 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Thermalization from quenching in coupled oscillators

M. Harinarayanan , Karthik Rajeev

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 02:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords quantum harmonic oscillatorthermalizationsudden quenchescoupled oscillatorsGaussian dynamicsquantum thermodynamicsfinite-time protocol

0 comments

The pith

Sudden quenches in coupled oscillators thermalize a quantum harmonic oscillator to any target temperature without a macroscopic bath.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a finite-time protocol that uses a second oscillator as an effective environment to thermalize a quantum harmonic oscillator from its ground state. Sudden quenches are performed on the oscillator frequencies and their coupling. The Gaussian nature of the dynamics allows the thermalization condition to be reduced to three solvable equations. These yield exact analytic solutions for a dense set of discrete temperatures and numerical solutions for others, approximating any temperature with a speed-accuracy trade-off. This provides a simple method for controlled thermalization in quantum systems.

Core claim

By coupling the target oscillator to a second one and applying sudden changes to their frequencies and coupling strength, the first oscillator reaches a thermal state. The Gaussian property means that matching the thermal covariance matrix requires solving only three equations for the quench parameters, which have analytic forms at certain temperatures.

What carries the argument

Reduction of thermalization conditions to three solvable equations from the Gaussian evolution under sudden quenches in coupled oscillators.

If this is right

Exact analytic solutions for quench parameters exist for a dense discrete set of temperatures.
Numerical solutions cover all other temperatures.
Any target temperature can be approximated arbitrarily closely.
The protocol is suitable for rapid thermalization in quantum thermodynamics experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This method could be adapted for preparing non-thermal states in similar finite-time settings.
It might offer insights into how small environments can mimic thermal baths in quantum systems.
Experimental tests in optomechanical or circuit QED systems could validate the precision limits.
The approach may connect to work on shortcuts to thermalization in open quantum systems.

Load-bearing premise

The second oscillator acts as a sufficient effective environment and its post-quench state does not prevent the first oscillator from reaching the target thermal covariance.

What would settle it

Perform the quench protocol and measure the final position-momentum covariance matrix of the first oscillator to check if it equals the thermal covariance at the intended temperature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.04028 by Karthik Rajeev, M. Harinarayanan.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Next, to illustrate a case where the target temperature does not belong to the SDS, consider β = FIG. 6: Finite-time thermalization of oscillator 1 to the thermal state at β = kB Eg log 2, starting from the ground state. kB Eg π. To a first approximation–accurate within about 1.16%–this temperature can be matched using the pair (l = 11, n = 12) or, equivalently, (l = 12, n = 11), both yielding β ≈ kB Eg … view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We introduce a finite-time protocol that thermalizes a quantum harmonic oscillator, initially in its ground state, without requiring a macroscopic bath. The method uses a second oscillator as an effective environment and implements sudden quenches of the oscillator frequencies and coupling. Owing to the Gaussian nature of the dynamics, the thermalization condition reduces to three solvable equations, yielding exact analytic solutions for a dense discrete set of temperatures and numerical solutions in all other cases. Any target temperature can be approximated with arbitrary precision, with a trade-off between speed and accuracy. The simplicity of the protocol makes it a promising tool for rapid, controlled thermalization in quantum thermodynamics experiments and state preparation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper reduces thermalization of a harmonic oscillator to three solvable equations on quench parameters by using a second oscillator as a temporary bath, with analytic solutions for a dense set of temperatures.

read the letter

The two things worth knowing are that the protocol uses sudden quenches on frequencies and coupling to drive the first oscillator to a target thermal covariance, and that the Gaussian property lets them turn the matching condition into three equations with analytic solutions for many temperatures and numerical ones for the rest. Any temperature can be hit to arbitrary precision by adding more steps if needed, at the cost of longer time. This is a concrete finite-time method that skips a macroscopic bath, which fits small-system experiments in quantum optics or thermodynamics. The reduction itself follows from standard covariance evolution under quadratic Hamiltonians, so the core math checks out without new formalism. They treat the target temperature as an input rather than fitting it, which keeps the claim clean. The soft spot is the final state. The abstract describes quenches on the coupling but does not explicitly state a last step that sets the coupling to zero. Without that decoupling, the two oscillators continue to interact and the covariance will drift away from the thermal target through ongoing energy exchange. If the full paper shows an explicit final g=0 quench plus a check that the state stays put afterward, the concern disappears. If not, the stability claim needs tightening. This is for readers working on state preparation or finite-time thermodynamics in oscillator systems. Experimental groups looking for simple protocols to test on trapped ions or circuits will get something they can actually implement and measure. The work is grounded enough in existing Gaussian techniques that the derivations are straightforward to verify. I would send it to referees. The three-equation reduction is a useful simplification and the protocol is practical, even if the decoupling detail needs to be made explicit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a finite-time protocol to thermalize a quantum harmonic oscillator, initially in its ground state, by using a second oscillator as an effective environment and performing sudden quenches on the frequencies and coupling strength. Owing to the Gaussian nature of the harmonic-oscillator dynamics, the condition for reaching a target thermal covariance reduces to three equations that admit exact analytic solutions for a dense discrete set of temperatures and numerical solutions otherwise, allowing arbitrary-precision approximation of any target temperature with a speed-accuracy trade-off.

Significance. If the protocol achieves a stable thermal state, the approach offers a simple, controllable method for thermalization in quantum thermodynamics without macroscopic baths, with potential utility for experiments and state preparation. The reduction to three solvable equations via Gaussian covariance evolution is a clear strength, yielding exact results in special cases without fitted parameters.

major comments (1)

[Protocol description] Protocol description (abstract and main text on quench sequence): the description of the quenches on frequencies and coupling does not explicitly confirm that the final coupling strength is quenched to g=0. Without final decoupling, the coupled equations of motion will drive ongoing energy exchange, causing the covariance of the first oscillator to deviate from the target thermal value. This is load-bearing for the claim of stable thermalization after the protocol ends.

minor comments (2)

The abstract states that analytic solutions exist for a dense discrete set of temperatures, but the explicit equations are not shown; adding them in the main text would improve clarity.
Notation for the covariance matrix and thermal target should be defined consistently in the first appearance to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the importance of an unambiguous protocol description. We address the single major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity on this point.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Protocol description (abstract and main text on quench sequence): the description of the quenches on frequencies and coupling does not explicitly confirm that the final coupling strength is quenched to g=0. Without final decoupling, the coupled equations of motion will drive ongoing energy exchange, causing the covariance of the first oscillator to deviate from the target thermal value. This is load-bearing for the claim of stable thermalization after the protocol ends.

Authors: We agree that an explicit statement of the final decoupling step strengthens the presentation. The protocol in the manuscript consists of three successive sudden quenches: (i) a frequency quench on the target oscillator, (ii) a quench of the coupling strength to a finite value g>0 that initiates energy exchange, and (iii) a final quench that simultaneously returns the frequencies to their initial values and sets the coupling to g=0. The third step is performed once the Gaussian covariance matrix of the first oscillator has reached the target thermal form; with g=0 the oscillators are decoupled and the covariance of the first oscillator remains frozen at the desired thermal value. Because the referee correctly notes that this final step is load-bearing for stability, we have added an explicit sentence in the abstract and a dedicated paragraph in Section II describing the full three-step sequence, including the explicit final quench to g=0. The revised text now states that the protocol ends with the oscillators decoupled. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The protocol solves for quench parameters by setting the evolved Gaussian covariance equal to a target thermal covariance using the standard equations of motion for coupled oscillators. The target temperature enters as an independent external parameter rather than being defined by the protocol. No steps reduce by construction to fitted outputs, self-citations, or ansatzes imported from prior work by the same authors. The central claim rests on solvable linear equations from the dynamics and remains independent of the result itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the standard quantum mechanics of coupled harmonic oscillators and the definition of a thermal Gaussian state; no new entities are introduced and the only free parameters are the quench values chosen to satisfy the three equations.

free parameters (1)

quench frequencies and coupling strengths
Values chosen to satisfy the three thermalization equations for a given target temperature.

axioms (2)

standard math The joint state remains Gaussian under sudden frequency and coupling quenches.
Standard property of quadratic Hamiltonians invoked in the abstract.
domain assumption Thermalization is achieved when the reduced covariance matrix of the first oscillator matches that of a thermal state at the target temperature.
Definition used to set up the three equations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5397 in / 1163 out tokens · 26822 ms · 2026-05-17T02:05:28.346577+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

1:The family of thermal density matrices is repre- sented by the curve ⃗Rβ = (coth(βω),0,−cosech(βω))

cothβω−2x 1x′ 1csch(βω)] , (7) FIG. 1:The family of thermal density matrices is repre- sented by the curve ⃗Rβ = (coth(βω),0,−cosech(βω)). The curve lies entirely in theX–Zplane, shown as the shaded region, where it is described by part of the hyper- bolaZ=− √ X 2 −1. The blue dot indicates the ground state, and the arrow shows the direction of increasing...

work page
[2]

Particle Theory at the Higgs Cen- tre

Evolution to the thermal state To visualize the time evolution of the density ma- trix as the system thermalizes under our protocol, we once again invoke the ⃗R-space defined in Sec- tion II. As a first example, we revisitβ= kB Eg log 2, corresponding to the quickest case in the SDS. The evolution ofoscillator-1 from the ground state to the thermal state ...

work page
[3]

The role of quantum information in thermodynamics – a topical review,

J. Goold, A. Riera, L. del Rio, M. Huber, and P. Skrzypczyk, “The role of quantum information in thermodynamics – a topical review,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49 no. 14, (Feb., 2016) 143001

work page 2016
[4]

Quantum thermodynamics: An introduction to the thermodynamics of quantum information,

S. Deffner and S. Campbell, “Quantum thermodynamics: An introduction to the thermodynamics of quantum information,” 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.01596

work page arXiv 2019
[5]

Perspective on quantum thermodynamics,

J. Millen and A. Xuereb, “Perspective on quantum thermodynamics,”New Journal of Physics18 no. 1, (2016) 011002

work page 2016
[6]

Introduction to black hole thermodynamics,

E. Witten, “Introduction to black hole thermodynamics,”Eur. Phys. J. Plus140no. 5, (2025) 430,arXiv:2412.16795 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[7]

Jerusalem Lectures on Black Holes and Quantum Information,

D. Harlow, “Jerusalem Lectures on Black Holes and Quantum Information,”Rev. Mod. Phys.88 (2016) 015002,arXiv:1409.1231 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[8]

Quantum thermodynamics,

S. Vinjanampathy and J. Anders, “Quantum thermodynamics,”Contemporary Physics57no. 4, (July, 2016) 545–579.http: //dx.doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2016.1201896

work page doi:10.1080/00107514.2016.1201896 2016
[9]

Quantum thermodynamic devices: From theoretical proposals to experimental reality,

N. M. Myers, O. Abah, and S. Deffner, “Quantum thermodynamic devices: From theoretical proposals to experimental reality,”A VS Quantum Sci.4no. 2, (2022) 027101,arXiv:2201.01740 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[10]

Artificial brownian motors: Controlling transport on the nanoscale,

P. H¨ anggi and F. Marchesoni, “Artificial brownian motors: Controlling transport on the nanoscale,” Reviews of Modern Physics81no. 1, (Mar., 2009) 387–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.387

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.387 2009
[11]

Fundamental limitations for quantum and nanoscale thermodynamics,

M. Horodecki and J. Oppenheim, “Fundamental limitations for quantum and nanoscale thermodynamics,”Nature Communications4 no. 1, (June, 2013) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3059

work page doi:10.1038/ncomms3059 2013
[12]

Quantum Simulation

I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, “Quantum Simulation,”Rev. Mod. Phys.86 (2014) 153,arXiv:1308.6253 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[13]

Quantum Thermal State Preparation,

C.-F. Chen, M. J. Kastoryano, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, and A. Gily´ en, “Quantum Thermal State Preparation,”arXiv:2303.18224 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv
[14]

End-to-end efficient quantum thermal and ground state preparation made simple,

Z. Ding, Y. Zhan, J. Preskill, and L. Lin, “End-to-end efficient quantum thermal and ground state preparation made simple,” 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05703

work page arXiv 2025
[15]

Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions

D. J. Wineland, C. Monroe, W. M. Itano, D. Leibfried, B. E. King, and D. M. Meekhof, “Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions,”J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Tech.103no. 3, (1998) 259, arXiv:quant-ph/9710025

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[16]

Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics,

A. Wallraff, D. I. Schuster, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, R.-S. Huang, J. Majer, S. Kumar, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics,”Nature431no. 7005, (2004) 162–167. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature02851

work page 2004
[17]

Cavity Optomechanics

M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, “Cavity Optomechanics,”Rev. Mod. Phys.86(2014) 1391,arXiv:1303.0733 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[18]

Mesoscopic physics of nanomechanical systems,

A. Bachtold, J. Moser, and M. I. Dykman, “Mesoscopic physics of nanomechanical systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys.94no. 4, (2022) 045005, arXiv:2202.01819 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2022
[19]

The quantum harmonic otto cycle,

R. Kosloff and Y. Rezek, “The quantum harmonic otto cycle,”Entropy19no. 4, (Mar., 2017) 136. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e19040136

work page doi:10.3390/e19040136 2017
[20]

Efficiency of harmonic quantum otto engines at maximal power,

S. Deffner, “Efficiency of harmonic quantum otto engines at maximal power,”Entropy20no. 11, (Nov., 2018) 875. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e20110875

work page doi:10.3390/e20110875 2018
[21]

Gaussian thermal operations and the limits of algorithmic cooling,

A. Serafini, M. Lostaglio, S. Longden, U. Shackerley-Bennett, C.-Y. Hsieh, and G. Adesso, “Gaussian thermal operations and the limits of algorithmic cooling,”Physical Review Letters124no. 1, (Jan., 2020) .http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.010602

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.010602 2020
[22]

Performance bounds of nonadiabatic quantum harmonic otto engine and refrigerator under a squeezed thermal reservoir,

V. Singh and ¨O. E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, “Performance bounds of nonadiabatic quantum harmonic otto engine and refrigerator under a squeezed thermal reservoir,”Physical Review E102no. 6, (Dec.,

work page
[23]

http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.062123

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.102.062123
[24]

Dynamical casimir effect and minimal temperature in quantum thermodynamics,

G. Benenti and G. Strini, “Dynamical casimir effect and minimal temperature in quantum thermodynamics,”Phys. Rev. A91(Feb, 2015) 020502.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.91.020502

work page 2015
[25]

Quantum jump model for a system with a 11 finite-size environment,

S. Suomela, A. Kutvonen, and T. Ala-Nissila, “Quantum jump model for a system with a 11 finite-size environment,”Phys. Rev. E93(Jun,

work page
[26]

1103/PhysRevE.93.062106

062106.https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevE.93.062106

work page
[27]

A self-contained quantum harmonic engine,

B. Reid, S. Pigeon, M. Antezza, and G. De Chiara, “A self-contained quantum harmonic engine,”EPL (Europhysics Letters)120no. 6, (Dec., 2017) 60006.http: //dx.doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/120/60006

work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/120/60006 2017
[28]

Thermodynamics as a consequence of information conservation,

M. N. Bera, A. Riera, M. Lewenstein, Z. B. Khanian, and A. Winter, “Thermodynamics as a consequence of information conservation,” Quantum3(Feb., 2019) 121.http: //dx.doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-02-14-121

work page doi:10.22331/q-2019-02-14-121 2019
[29]

Shortcuts to adiabaticity

E. Torrontegui, S. Ib´ a˜ nez, S. Mart´ ınez-Garaot, M. Modugno, A. del Campo, D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, X. Chen, and J. G. Muga, “Shortcuts to Adiabaticity,”Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys.62(2013) 117–169,arXiv:1212.6343 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[30]

Focus on shortcuts to adiabaticity,

A. del Campo and K. Kim, “Focus on shortcuts to adiabaticity,”New Journal of Physics21no. 5, (May, 2019) 050201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab1437

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab1437 2019
[31]

Second order differential equations: conditions of complete integrability,

V. P. Ermakov, “Second order differential equations: conditions of complete integrability,” Univ. Izv. Kiev20no. 9, (1880) 1

work page
[32]

Classical and quantum systems with time-dependent harmonic-oscillator-type hamiltonians,

H. R. Lewis Jr, “Classical and quantum systems with time-dependent harmonic-oscillator-type hamiltonians,”Physical Review Letters18no. 13, (1967) 510

work page 1967
[33]

Class of exact invariants for classical and quantum time-dependent harmonic oscillators,

H. R. Lewis Jr, “Class of exact invariants for classical and quantum time-dependent harmonic oscillators,”Journal of Mathematical Physics9 no. 11, (1968) 1976–1986

work page 1968
[34]

Resolved-sideband raman cooling of a bound atom to the 3d zero-point energy,

C. Monroe, D. Meekhof, B. King, S. R. Jefferts, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland, and P. Gould, “Resolved-sideband raman cooling of a bound atom to the 3d zero-point energy,”Physical review letters75no. 22, (1995) 4011

work page 1995
[35]

Generation of nonclassical motional states of a trapped atom,

D. Meekhof, C. Monroe, B. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, “Generation of nonclassical motional states of a trapped atom,”Physical review letters76no. 11, (1996) 1796

work page 1996
[36]

Nonequilibrium work distribution of a quantum harmonic oscillator,

S. Deffner and E. Lutz, “Nonequilibrium work distribution of a quantum harmonic oscillator,” Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics77no. 2, (2008) 021128

work page 2008
[37]

Thermal control across a chain of electronic nanocavities,

E. Jussiau, S. K. Manikandan, B. Bhandari, and A. N. Jordan, “Thermal control across a chain of electronic nanocavities,”Physical Review B104 no. 4, (July, 2021) .http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.045414

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.045414 2021
[38]

D. E. Kirk,Optimal Control Theory: An Introduction. Courier Corporation, Mineola, NY, 2004.https://books.google.com/books/about/ Optimal_Control_Theory.html?id=fCh2SAtWIdwC

work page 2004
[39]

Microwave quantum logic gates for trapped ions,

C. Ospelkaus, U. Warring, Y. Colombe, K. R. Brown, J. M. Amini, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, “Microwave quantum logic gates for trapped ions,”Nature476no. 7359, (Aug., 2011) 181–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10290

work page doi:10.1038/nature10290 2011
[40]

Cooling a quantum oscillator: A useful analogy to understand laser cooling as a thermodynamical process,

N. Freitas and J. P. Paz, “Cooling a quantum oscillator: A useful analogy to understand laser cooling as a thermodynamical process,”Phys. Rev. A97(Mar, 2018) 032104.https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.032104

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.97.032104 2018
[41]

Quantum harmonic oscillator state synthesis by reservoir engineering,

D. Kienzler, H.-Y. Lo, B. Keitch, L. de Clercq, F. Leupold, F. Lindenfelser, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevitsky, and J. P. Home, “Quantum harmonic oscillator state synthesis by reservoir engineering,”Science347no. 6217, (Jan., 2015) 53–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1261033

work page doi:10.1126/science.1261033 2015
[42]

Nanoscale heat engine beyond the carnot limit,

J. Roßnagel, O. Abah, F. Schmidt-Kaler, K. Singer, and E. Lutz, “Nanoscale heat engine beyond the carnot limit,”Physical Review Letters 112no. 3, (Jan., 2014) .http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.030602

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.030602 2014
[43]

A single-atom heat engine,

J. Roßnagel, S. T. Dawkins, K. N. Tolazzi, O. Abah, E. Lutz, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer, “A single-atom heat engine,”Science 352no. 6283, (Apr., 2016) 325–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad6320

work page doi:10.1126/science.aad6320 2016
[44]

Quantum work statistics of linear and nonlinear parametric oscillators,

S. Deffner, O. Abah, and E. Lutz, “Quantum work statistics of linear and nonlinear parametric oscillators,”Chemical Physics375no. 2-3, (2010) 200–208

work page 2010
[45]

Work and efficiency of quantum otto cycles in power-law trapping potentials,

Y. Zheng and D. Poletti, “Work and efficiency of quantum otto cycles in power-law trapping potentials,”Physical Review E90no. 1, (2014) 012145

work page 2014
[46]

Quantum marginal problem and n-representability,

A. A. Klyachko, “Quantum marginal problem and n-representability,”Journal of Physics: Conference Series36(Apr., 2006) 72–86.http: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/36/1/014

work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/36/1/014 2006
[47]

Random Pure Gaussian States and Hawking Radiation,

E. Aurell, L. Hackl, P. Horodecki, R. H. Jonsson, and M. Kieburg, “Random Pure Gaussian States and Hawking Radiation,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133 no. 6, (2024) 060202,arXiv:2311.10562 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[48]

Average entanglement entropy of a small subsystem in a constrained pure Gaussian state ensemble,

E. Aurell, L. Hackl, and M. Kieburg, “Average entanglement entropy of a small subsystem in a constrained pure Gaussian state ensemble,” arXiv:2505.03696 [quant-ph]. 12

work page arXiv