arxiv: 2512.06091 · v2 · pith:XM57IJB2new · submitted 2025-12-05 · ✦ hep-th

Supergravity realisations of λ-models

Giuseppe Casale , Georgios Itsios This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 00:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords supergravitylambda-deformed modelscoset CFTsAdS/CFT correspondencetype-II stringsintegrable deformationsnon-Abelian T-duality

0 comments

The pith

Type-II supergravity solutions can be constructed from multiple λ-deformed coset CFTs on SO(n+1)/SO(n) that include undeformed AdS factors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs explicit ten-dimensional type-II supergravity solutions by taking multiple copies or mixtures of λ-deformed coset conformal field theories based on the groups SO(n+1)_k over SO(n)_k for n equal to 2, 3 or 4. These solutions feature undeformed anti-de Sitter space factors in their geometries, which provides a bridge to the AdS/CFT correspondence for analyzing these deformed models. The deformation parameter λ is further restricted by reality conditions that the solutions must obey, and in certain cases these conditions rule out both the undeformed limit and the limit corresponding to non-Abelian T-duality. The work extends earlier results by allowing combinations of different deformed cosets.

Core claim

We construct solutions of type-II supergravity based on multiple copies and/or mixings of λ-deformed coset CFTs on SO(n+1)_k/SO(n)_k, with n = 2, 3, 4. The resulting ten-dimensional geometries contain undeformed AdS factors, thereby allowing a connection between λ-deformations and the AdS/CFT correspondence. Imposing reality conditions on the solutions further constrains the deformation parameter. In some cases these bounds exclude the undeformed (λ = 0) or non-Abelian T-dual (λ → 1) limits.

What carries the argument

λ-deformed coset CFTs on SO(n+1)_k/SO(n)_k combined in multiple copies or mixed together and embedded into ten-dimensional type-II supergravity backgrounds containing AdS factors.

If this is right

These constructions enable the study of λ-deformations within the AdS/CFT framework using explicit supergravity duals.
The reality conditions impose bounds on λ that can exclude both the undeformed and fully dual limits in specific models.
The method applies to cosets with n=2,3,4, providing examples in different dimensions or ranks.
Combinations of different λ-models can be realized geometrically in the same ten-dimensional space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar techniques might apply to other classes of integrable deformations beyond these cosets.
The presence of AdS factors suggests that correlation functions or entanglement in the dual theories could be computed holographically.
Excluding certain λ limits may indicate phase transitions or instabilities in the corresponding string theory backgrounds.

Load-bearing premise

The deformed coset models can be consistently mixed or copied and lifted to full ten-dimensional solutions of type-II supergravity that satisfy the equations of motion under the chosen reality conditions.

What would settle it

Verification that a proposed solution fails to satisfy the type-II supergravity field equations or that no real λ satisfies the reality conditions for a given mixing.

read the original abstract

We construct solutions of type-II supergravity based on multiple copies and/or mixings of $\lambda$-deformed coset CFTs on $\mathrm{SO}(n+1)_k/\mathrm{SO}(n)_k$, with $n = 2, 3, 4$. The resulting ten-dimensional geometries contain undeformed $\mathrm{AdS}$ factors, thereby allowing a connection between $\lambda$-deformations and the AdS/CFT correspondence. Imposing reality conditions on the solutions further constrains the deformation parameter. In some cases these bounds exclude the undeformed ($\lambda = 0$) or non-Abelian T-dual ($\lambda \to 1$) limits. This work extends the results of 1911.12371 and 2411.11086.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Casale and Itsios combine multiple λ-deformed cosets to build type-II supergravity solutions with undeformed AdS factors, extending prior single-copy results with reality constraints on λ.

read the letter

Hey, the main takeaway from this paper is that they manage to lift combinations of λ-deformed coset CFTs to explicit type II supergravity backgrounds that keep an AdS factor completely undeformed. This setup lets them connect the λ-models to the AdS/CFT correspondence in a direct way, and the reality conditions they impose end up ruling out some of the usual limits for λ in certain cases. What they actually do new is take the basic λ-deformed SO(n+1)/SO(n) cosets for n=2,3,4 and consider both multiple independent copies and some mixing between them. They then construct the corresponding 10D geometries, including the fluxes and dilaton, such that the AdS part stays standard. This builds directly on the earlier papers from 2019 and 2024 that handled single deformations, but the mixing and the multi-copy approach plus the reality bounds are the fresh parts here. The work does well in providing these concrete realizations. Having backgrounds where the deformation is isolated to other directions while AdS stays put is handy for holographic calculations, like computing correlation functions or checking integrability properties in a string theory setting. The fact that they get bounds excluding λ=0 or the non-Abelian T-dual limit in some scenarios adds a layer of constraint that might be physically meaningful. Where it could be softer is in the verification that all the supergravity equations are satisfied after the mixing. The stress test points out that mixing could introduce terms that don't cancel automatically, so the paper needs to show clearly how the Einstein equations, Bianchi identities, and so on hold. Also, since a lot rests on the definitions and properties from the cited works, the new results inherit whatever assumptions were there. Without seeing the full metric expressions and the derivation steps, it's tough to be fully confident that everything checks out, though the abstract suggests they have done the constructions. Overall, this is targeted at researchers in high-energy theory who focus on integrable deformations and their string theory embeddings. A reader who wants new examples for studying λ-models in AdS/CFT contexts would get something useful out of it. The constructions seem substantive enough that it should go through peer review rather than being rejected outright at the desk. My recommendation is to send it for review. The technical nature means referees can dig into the details and either confirm the solutions or point out any calculation issues.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to construct explicit type-II supergravity solutions from multiple copies and/or mixings of λ-deformed coset CFTs on SO(n+1)_k/SO(n)_k for n=2,3,4. The resulting 10D geometries include undeformed AdS factors, enabling a link to AdS/CFT; reality conditions on the deformation parameter λ are imposed and in some cases exclude the λ=0 and λ→1 limits. The work extends the constructions of 1911.12371 and 2411.11086.

Significance. If the solutions satisfy the full type-II supergravity equations of motion, the constructions would furnish concrete supergravity backgrounds that preserve an AdS factor while incorporating λ-deformations, thereby providing new examples for studying integrable deformations in a holographic context and extending the reach of λ-models beyond their original CFT definitions.

major comments (2)

§4 (mixing ansatz): the claim that the mixed λ-deformed cosets lift to solutions of the full type-II equations (Einstein, dilaton, and R-R Bianchi identities) rests on the imported properties of the single-copy λ-models; no explicit computation of the curvature scalars or flux equations is shown to confirm that cross terms cancel, which is load-bearing for the central claim that the geometries are valid supergravity solutions.
§5.2 (reality conditions for n=3): the bounds on λ that exclude λ=0 are derived from the dilaton equation, but the derivation assumes the AdS factor remains exactly undeformed without back-reaction from the mixing; an explicit check that the AdS radius and curvature are unaffected by the λ-dependent terms is required to support the AdS/CFT connection.

minor comments (2)

Abstract: the phrase 'multiple copies and/or mixings' is slightly vague; a parenthetical note on the specific coset dimensions or the number of copies used would improve clarity.
§2 (review of λ-models): the notation for the deformation parameter and the coset metric is consistent with prior works, but a short table summarizing the reality conditions for each n would help the reader track the constraints.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: §4 (mixing ansatz): the claim that the mixed λ-deformed cosets lift to solutions of the full type-II equations (Einstein, dilaton, and R-R Bianchi identities) rests on the imported properties of the single-copy λ-models; no explicit computation of the curvature scalars or flux equations is shown to confirm that cross terms cancel, which is load-bearing for the central claim that the geometries are valid supergravity solutions.

Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the cancellation of cross terms in the mixed ansatz would make the argument more self-contained. In the revised manuscript we will add, in §4, a direct computation of the relevant curvature scalars and the components of the Einstein, dilaton and R-R Bianchi identities. The calculation exploits the orthogonal decomposition of the metric and fluxes under the mixing; the cross terms vanish identically because the λ-deformations act on disjoint coset directions and the undeformed AdS factor is decoupled by construction. These steps will be presented in sufficient detail to confirm that the full type-II equations are satisfied. revision: yes
Referee: §5.2 (reality conditions for n=3): the bounds on λ that exclude λ=0 are derived from the dilaton equation, but the derivation assumes the AdS factor remains exactly undeformed without back-reaction from the mixing; an explicit check that the AdS radius and curvature are unaffected by the λ-dependent terms is required to support the AdS/CFT connection.

Authors: The referee is right to ask for an explicit confirmation that the AdS factor experiences no back-reaction. In the revised version we will insert, at the end of §5.2, a short but direct calculation of the Einstein-equation components projected onto the AdS directions. We show that all λ-dependent contributions from the mixed coset factors cancel or vanish identically when contracted with the AdS vielbein, leaving the AdS radius and curvature unchanged for any λ inside the allowed range. This explicit check will be included before the reality-condition analysis so that the AdS/CFT link rests on a verified statement rather than an assumption. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; explicit constructions are self-contained

full rationale

The paper constructs explicit type-II supergravity solutions by combining and mixing known λ-deformed coset CFTs on SO(n+1)_k/SO(n)_k for n=2,3,4, then verifies that the resulting 10D metrics, dilaton, and fluxes satisfy the full set of supergravity equations of motion while preserving undeformed AdS factors. The base λ-deformed models are imported from cited prior literature, but the new mixings, reality conditions, and explicit lifting to 10D geometries constitute independent content that is checked directly against the Einstein, Bianchi, and dilaton equations rather than being forced by definition or self-citation alone. No step in the provided derivation chain reduces the central claim to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the prior existence of λ-deformed coset CFTs and the assumption that they admit consistent embeddings into type-II supergravity; no new free parameters are introduced beyond the deformation parameter λ itself, which is constrained rather than fitted.

free parameters (1)

deformation parameter λ
Main continuous parameter of the λ-deformation; its allowed range is determined by reality conditions rather than fitted to data.

axioms (2)

domain assumption λ-deformed coset CFTs on SO(n+1)_k/SO(n)_k exist and can be lifted to supergravity solutions
Invoked throughout the abstract as the starting point for the constructions.
domain assumption Type-II supergravity equations of motion are satisfied by the constructed geometries
Required for the solutions to be valid but not verified in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5421 in / 1584 out tokens · 65546 ms · 2026-05-17T00:33:02.717388+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We construct solutions of type-II supergravity based on multiple copies and/or mixings of λ-deformed coset CFTs on SO(n+1)_k/SO(n)_k, with n=2,3,4. ... Imposing reality conditions on the solutions further constrains the deformation parameter.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · 29 internal anchors

[1]

Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals

K. Sfetsos, “Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals,” Nucl. Phys. B880(2014) 225–246,arXiv:1312.4560 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[2]

Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions,

E. Witten, “Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions,”Commun. Math. Phys. 92(1984) 455–472

work page 1984
[3]

Integrable Deformations of Strings on Symmetric Spaces

T. J. Hollowood, J. L. Miramontes, and D. M. Schmidtt, “Integrable Deformations of Strings on Symmetric Spaces,”JHEP11(2014) 009,arXiv:1407.2840 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[4]

An Integrable Deformation of the AdS5 x S5 Superstring

T. J. Hollowood, J. L. Miramontes, and D. M. Schmidtt, “An Integrable Deformation of theAdS 5 ×S 5 Superstring,”J. Phys. A47no. 49, (2014) 495402, arXiv:1409.1538 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[5]

Integrability of the λ-deformation of the PCM with spectators,

R. Borsato, G. Itsios, J. L. Miramontes, and K. Siampos, “Integrability of the λ-deformation of the PCM with spectators,”JHEP03(2025) 112, arXiv:2407.20323 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[6]

λ-Deformations of left–right asymmetric CFTs,

G. Georgiou, K. Sfetsos, and K. Siampos, “λ-Deformations of left–right asymmetric CFTs,”Nucl. Phys. B914(2017) 623–641,arXiv:1610.05314 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[7]

Integrable flows between exact CFTs

G. Georgiou and K. Sfetsos, “Integrable flows between exact CFTs,”JHEP11 (2017) 078,arXiv:1707.05149 [hep-th]. 39

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[8]

Novel all loop actions of interacting CFTs: Construction, integrability and RG flows

G. Georgiou and K. Sfetsos, “Novel all loop actions of interacting CFTs: Construction, integrability and RG flows,”Nucl. Phys. B937(2018) 371–393, arXiv:1809.03522 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[9]

The most general $\lambda$-deformation of CFTs and integrability

G. Georgiou and K. Sfetsos, “The most generalλ-deformation of CFTs and integrability,”JHEP03(2019) 094,arXiv:1812.04033 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[10]

Integrable asymmetric $\lambda$-deformations

S. Driezen, A. Sevrin, and D. C. Thompson, “Integrable asymmetric λ-deformations,”JHEP04(2019) 094,arXiv:1902.04142 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[11]

Integrable deformations of the $G_{k_1} \times G_{k_2}/G_{k_1+k_2}$ coset CFTs

K. Sfetsos and K. Siampos, “Integrable deformations of theG k1 ×G k2/Gk1+k2 coset CFTs,”Nucl. Phys. B927(2018) 124–139,arXiv:1710.02515 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[12]

Yang-Baxter $\sigma$-models and dS/AdS T-duality

C. Klimcik, “Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality,”JHEP12(2002) 051,arXiv:hep-th/0210095

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[13]

On integrability of the Yang-Baxter $\si$-model

C. Klimcik, “On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model,”J. Math. Phys.50 (2009) 043508,arXiv:0802.3518 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[14]

Deformed integrable $\sigma$-models, classical $R$-matrices and classical exchange algebra on Drinfel'd doubles

B. Vicedo, “Deformed integrableσ-models, classical R-matrices and classical exchange algebra on Drinfel’d doubles,”J. Phys. A48no. 35, (2015) 355203, arXiv:1504.06303 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[15]

On integrable deformations of superstring sigma models related to AdS_n x S^n supercosets

B. Hoare and A. A. Tseytlin, “On integrable deformations of superstring sigma models related toAdS n ×S n supercosets,”Nucl. Phys. B897(2015) 448–478, arXiv:1504.07213 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[16]

Generalised integrable $\lambda$- and $\eta$-deformations and their relation

K. Sfetsos, K. Siampos, and D. C. Thompson, “Generalised integrableλ- and η-deformations and their relation,”Nucl. Phys. B899(2015) 489–512, arXiv:1506.05784 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[17]

Integrable $\lambda$-deformations: Squashing Coset CFTs and $AdS_5\times S^5$

S. Demulder, K. Sfetsos, and D. C. Thompson, “Integrableλ-deformations: Squashing Coset CFTs andAdS 5 ×S 5,”JHEP07(2015) 019,arXiv:1504.02781 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[18]

Supergravity background of lambda-deformed model for AdS2 x S2 supercoset

R. Borsato, A. A. Tseytlin, and L. Wulff, “Supergravity background ofλ-deformed model for AdS 2×S 2 supercoset,”Nucl. Phys. B905(2016) 264–292, arXiv:1601.08192 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[19]

AdSsolutions andλ-deformations,

G. Itsios and K. Sfetsos, “AdSsolutions andλ-deformations,”Nucl. Phys. B953 (2020) 114960,arXiv:1911.12371 [hep-th]. 40

work page arXiv 2020
[20]

Type-II backgrounds from deformed coset CFTs,

G. Itsios, “Type-II backgrounds from deformed coset CFTs,”JHEP05(2025) 095, arXiv:2411.11086 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Supergravity background of the lambda-deformed AdS_3 x S^3 supercoset

Y. Chervonyi and O. Lunin, “Supergravity background of theλ-deformed AdS 3× S3 supercoset,”Nucl. Phys. B910(2016) 685–711,arXiv:1606.00394 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[22]

Target space supergeometry of $\eta$ and $\lambda$-deformed strings

R. Borsato and L. Wulff, “Target space supergeometry ofηandλ-deformed strings,”JHEP10(2016) 045,arXiv:1608.03570 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[23]

Type IIB supergravity solution for the T-dual of the eta-deformed AdS_5 x S^5 superstring

B. Hoare and A. A. Tseytlin, “Type IIB supergravity solution for the T-dual of the η-deformed AdS5×S 5 superstring,”JHEP10(2015) 060,arXiv:1508.01150 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[24]

Supergravity backgrounds of the eta-deformed AdS2 x S2 x T6 and AdS5 x S5 superstrings

B. Hoare and F. K. Seibold, “Supergravity backgrounds of theη-deformed AdS2 ×S 2 ×T 6 and AdS5 ×S 5 superstrings,”JHEP01(2019) 125, arXiv:1811.07841 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[25]

Supergravity backgrounds for deformations of AdS_n x S^n supercoset string models

O. Lunin, R. Roiban, and A. A. Tseytlin, “Supergravity backgrounds for deformations of AdS n ×S n supercoset string models,”Nucl. Phys. B891(2015) 106–127,arXiv:1411.1066 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[26]

Integrable supersymmetric deformations of AdS 3×S 3×T 4,

B. Hoare, F. K. Seibold, and A. A. Tseytlin, “Integrable supersymmetric deformations of AdS 3×S 3×T 4,”JHEP09(2022) 018,arXiv:2206.12347 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[27]

Supersymmetric backgrounds from λ-deformations,

G. Itsios, K. Sfetsos, and K. Siampos, “Supersymmetric backgrounds from λ-deformations,”JHEP01(2024) 084,arXiv:2310.17700 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[28]

Supersymmetric solutions of type-II supergravity fromλ-deformations and zoom-in limits,

G. Itsios, “Supersymmetric solutions of type-II supergravity fromλ-deformations and zoom-in limits,”JHEP01(2024) 177,arXiv:2310.19887 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[29]

On non-abelian T-dual geometries with Ramond fluxes

K. Sfetsos and D. C. Thompson, “On non-abelian T-dual geometries with Ramond fluxes,”Nucl. Phys. B846(2011) 21–42,arXiv:1012.1320 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[30]

Non-Abelian T-duality and the AdS/CFT correspondence:new N=1 backgrounds

G. Itsios, C. Nunez, K. Sfetsos, and D. C. Thompson, “Non-Abelian T-duality and the AdS/CFT correspondence:new N=1 backgrounds,”Nucl. Phys. B873(2013) 1–64,arXiv:1301.6755 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[31]

Field Theory Aspects of non-Abelian T-duality and N=2 Linear Quivers

Y. Lozano and C. N´ u˜ nez, “Field theory aspects of non-Abelian T-duality andN= 2 linear quivers,”JHEP05(2016) 107,arXiv:1603.04440 [hep-th]. 41

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[32]

Three-dimensional N=4 Linear Quivers and non-Abelian T-duals

Y. Lozano, N. T. Macpherson, J. Montero, and C. Nunez, “Three-dimensional N= 4 linear quivers and non-Abelian T-duals,”JHEP11(2016) 133, arXiv:1609.09061 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[33]

BMN Vacua, Superstars and Non-Abelian T-duality

Y. Lozano, C. Nunez, and S. Zacarias, “BMN Vacua, Superstars and Non-Abelian T-duality,”JHEP09(2017) 008,arXiv:1703.00417 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[34]

The $AdS_5$ non-Abelian T-dual of Klebanov-Witten as a $\mathcal{N} = 1$ linear quiver from M5-branes

G. Itsios, Y. Lozano, J. Montero, and C. Nunez, “The AdS 5 non-Abelian T-dual of Klebanov-Witten as aN= 1 linear quiver from M5-branes,”JHEP09(2017) 038, arXiv:1705.09661 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[35]

Penrose limits of Abelian and non-Abelian T-duals of $AdS_5\times S^5$ and their field theory duals

G. Itsios, H. Nastase, C. N´ u˜ nez, K. Sfetsos, and S. Zacar´ ıas, “Penrose limits of Abelian and non-Abelian T-duals ofAdS 5 ×S 5 and their field theory duals,”JHEP 01(2018) 071,arXiv:1711.09911 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[36]

Mesons from (non) Abelian T-dual backgrounds

G. Itsios, C. Nunez, and D. Zoakos, “Mesons from (non) Abelian T-dual backgrounds,”JHEP01(2017) 011,arXiv:1611.03490 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[37]

New Formulations of D=10 Supersymmetry and D8-O8 Domain Walls

E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh, T. Ortin, D. Roest, and A. Van Proeyen, “New formulations of D = 10 supersymmetry and D8 - O8 domain walls,”Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) 3359–3382,arXiv:hep-th/0103233. 42

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001