Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 87 references

Loop Corrected Supercharges from Holomorphic Anomalies

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper computes the complete one-loop corrections to the supercharge in four-dimensional Lagrangian supersymmetric gauge theories, and for N=4 SYM the result is a compact superfield identity.

desk verdict A real computation with a genuinely compact N=4 payoff; the regulator scheme is an acknowledged soft spot, and the missing test is whether the resulting Q1-cohomology reproduces the known SO(7) lifts. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.07771 v3 pith:JS3ZGI52 submitted 2025-12-08 hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.QA

Kasia Budzik , Justin Kulp This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.QA MSC 81T6081T1381T18 PACS 11.30.Pb11.15.-q
keywords supersymmetryholomorphictwistL∞algebrassuperchargecorrectionsKonishianomalyN=4superYang-Millssemi-chiralringone-loopanomalies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper works out, in the holomorphic twist, the full one-loop deformation of the supersymmetry supercharge for 4d N=1 Lagrangian gauge theories with arbitrary chiral matter and superpotential. It shows that this correction is a BRST anomaly captured by a higher L∞ bracket, and that the entire calculation reduces to a single universal triangle integral. In N=4 SYM the one-loop supercharge reorganizes into a compact superfield formula involving three Grassmann differences and derivatives of the superfield C. If correct, this determines which tree-level semi-chiral operators are lifted at one loop, i.e., which operators cease to be annihilated by the quantum supercharge.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the L∞ conformal algebra of the free holomorphic theory, whose higher λ-brackets {O1,...,Ok}0 are computed by Feynman diagrams with the Bochner-Martinelli propagator. Loop corrections to the supercharge are the higher brackets with the interaction I repeated: Q_n O = 1/(n+1)! {I,...,I,O}0. At one loop only the triangle Laman graph contributes, and all its contributions are controlled by a single master integral I[λ;z] that becomes a differential operator acting on fields; the paper evaluates this integral in a Schwinger-parameter scheme and converts it to explicit formulas for Q1 on fields and derivatives.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop supercharge for the same theory using an alternative UV regularization (e.g., Feynman parameters or a momentum cutoff) and check whether the lifted operators change; in particular, verify for pure N=1 SYM that the pairing of the A, B, C towers is scheme-independent, and for N=4 SYM with SO(7) that the known one-loop lift of a fortuitous operator is reproduced.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the one-loop supercharge Q1 in the holomorphic twist of 4d Lagrangian SUSY gauge theories is computed by the 3-ary L∞ bracket {I,I,O}0 evaluated in a Schwinger-parametrized regularization, and that for N=4 SYM it admits the local expression Q1(C^A(θ)C^B(θ′)) = -(κ/2) f^ACD f^BCE (θ1-θ'1)(θ2-θ'2)(θ3-θ'3) ∂_{˙α}C^D(θ) ∂^{˙α}C^E(θ′), where C is the twisted superfield. This constitutes the complete one-loop correction, meaning it fixes, to first order in perturbation theory, which pairs of fields get renormalized and which semi-chiral operators remain Q-closed.

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the one-loop supercharge with the 3-ary bracket {I,I,O}0 computed in a Schwinger-parameter scheme is assumed to give the physical, scheme-independent loop correction; if a different regulator changes which operators are lifted, the central claim fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The one-loop supercharge acts on pairs of fields and does not satisfy the Leibniz rule on normal-ordered products, so quantum corrections generically mix operators of different lengths.
  • In pure N=1 SYM the correction pairs the A_n and B_n towers of single-trace operators into Q1-exact combinations, leaving only the C_n tower in the quantum-corrected cohomology.
  • In N=4 SYM, the planar-limit single-trace cohomology (symmetrized products of γ fields) is Q1-closed, so the infinite-N spectrum is unchanged at one loop.
  • The Wess-Zumino consistency condition forces Q1^2 + {Q0,Q2} = 0, so a non-trivial two-loop correction must exist.
  • The explicit formulas, including action on derivatives, are given in a form ready for symbolic computation, enabling direct checks on small gauge groups.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors leave implicit that if the one-loop supercharge is scheme-dependent, the set of lifted operators may change with the regulator; a scheme-independent formulation would require identifying an observable, such as the cohomology of a gauge-invariant ring, that does not depend on this choice.
  • The compact N=4 formula suggests an underlying algebraic deformation of the Lie algebra cohomology differential; the paper notes this as an open problem, and one could test whether the deformation corresponds to a homotopy Lie algebra structure on the twisted fields.
  • A natural extension of the technique would apply the same triangle master integral to other dimensions and twists, potentially yielding one-loop supercharges for 3d or 2d twisted theories.
  • A concrete test: repeat the one-loop computation in a different regularization scheme, such as Feynman parameters or dimensional reduction, and compare which operators are lifted; if the lifted set differs, the scheme dependence is physical and the central claim would need refinement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes the one-loop correction Q1 to the nilpotent supercharge in the holomorphic twist of four-dimensional Lagrangian supersymmetric gauge theories, following the L∞-bracket formalism of the authors' previous work. The main technical tool is a universal triangle master integral, reviewed in Appendix A, from which the action of Q1 on all quadratic combinations of twisted fields is obtained in Section 3.1, including vector multiplets, arbitrary chiral matter, and a superpotential. For pure N=1, N=2, and N=4 SYM the results are repackaged into compact superfield expressions, with the N=4 result advertised as eq. (1.10)/(3.69). The paper also gives an argument that in the planar limit of SU(N) N=4 SYM the infinite-N single-trace cohomology is unchanged at one loop, while leaving the finite-N question open.

Significance. If the computed Q1 is correct and scheme-independent, this is a valuable result: it provides the first complete one-loop deformation of the supercharge in the holomorphic twist, and it directly constrains which classical semi-chiral operators survive at one loop. The computation is carried out carefully: the master integral is reproduced in Appendix A, the derivative action is spelled out in Appendix B with a combinatorial derivation in Appendix C, and one component (3.65) matches the independent result [49]. The compact superfield form (3.69) is elegant and likely to be useful. However, the advertised central formula has an internal normalization/sign inconsistency with the component expressions, and the physical scheme-dependence of the Schwinger-parameter regulator is not yet resolved; both points must be addressed before the result can be accepted as stated.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3.1; eqs. (3.15)-(3.19), (3.23)-(3.25)] The paper states the one-loop supercharge for arbitrary chiral matter and a general superpotential, but the derivation of the non-adjoint formulas (3.15)-(3.19) is not shown; only the adjoint cubic case is derived in detail (Appendix C). While the Laman-graph argument plausibly ensures completeness, the reader cannot check the representation-dependent color factors and signs without repeating the computation. Please provide at least a schematic derivation of the non-adjoint formulas, or state explicitly that they follow by the same contraction rules as the adjoint case, so that the completeness claim is verifiable.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (1.10) vs Eq. (3.69)] The introduction writes (1.10) with a coefficient -1/4 and no κ, while (3.69) has -κ/2. If these are the same formula with κ=1/2, say so explicitly; otherwise the mismatch is confusing and should be fixed.
  2. [§2.2.2] In the display after eq. (2.22), the sentence “We then study how the interaction deforms...” appears as a paragraph break; the logical connection to the preceding display should be smoothed.
  3. [Footnotes 6-7] The text says in the main body that Q1 does not square to zero, while footnote 6 clarifies that it does square to zero on Q0-cohomology. Please make this domain distinction in the main text as well, to avoid apparent contradiction.
  4. [§3.4.1] The planar-limit argument that all psl(3|3) descendants of γ^I traces are Q1-closed would benefit from a one-line explanation of why Q1 commutes with the tree-level psl(3|3) generators on Q0-cohomology; currently this is asserted without proof.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Q1 is obtained by an explicit, theory-independent master integral computation (reproduced in Appendix A), with an external cross-check to [49]; self-citations to prior framework are load-bearing but independently derived, not circular.

full rationale

The central claim—the one-loop supercharge (1.10)/(3.69)—is not derived by definitional identification with an input. It is produced by evaluating the 3-ary bracket Q1 = (1/2){I,I,O}_0 (eq. 2.24) using the one-loop triangle master integral I_[λ;z], which is recomputed explicitly in Appendix A (eqs. A.10–A.12) rather than merely cited. The component formulas (3.63)–(3.68) follow from substituting the group-theoretic structure constants and the N=4 superpotential into the general one-loop actions of Section 3.1. No parameter is fitted to the target output; the only inputs are general formalism and a universal integral. The compact superfield forms (3.36), (3.45), and (3.69) are reorganizations of independently obtained component results, not ansatze imposed at the start. The paper's reliance on [16–18] is self-citational, but those works are used as general perturbative/QFT machinery, not as an unverified uniqueness theorem, and the key integral is reproduced in this paper. There is also an external benchmark: eq. (3.65) is explicitly noted as having been computed in [49]. The flagged scheme dependence (footnote 7: Q1^2 + {Q0,Q2} = 0, so Q1 does not square to zero) and the open finite-N BPS question (§3.4.1) are substantive physical caveats about whether this regulator gives the physical loop correction, but they are correctness risks, not circular reductions: the paper does not use its conclusions as premises. No specific step equates an input with an output by construction, so no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computation has no fitted parameters and postulates no new entities. It rests instead on a sequence of domain assumptions (twist equivalence, L∞ bracket expansion, Laman graph selection, and a specific regularization scheme), most of which are taken from the authors' earlier papers rather than independently verified here.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The holomorphic twist cohomology is isomorphic to the original supersymmetric theory's semi-chiral ring.
    Section 2.1; relies on prior work [15,24] to identify Q-cohomology with the twisted theory.
  • domain assumption Loop corrections to Q are given by the higher L∞ brackets in (1.6)/(2.22).
    Section 2.2.2; derived in [16,17,18], not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption Only Laman graphs contribute to the higher brackets; the one-loop correction is the triangle diagram.
    Section 2.3; a result from [18] on form-degree constraints.
  • domain assumption The Schwinger-parametrized master integral (2.43) is finite and yields the anomaly in a well-defined scheme.
    Section 2.3 and Appendix A; the scheme-dependence is acknowledged in footnote 7.
  • standard math The Bochner-Martinelli propagator and Wick contraction rules are valid for the holomorphic field theory.
    Section 2.3; standard harmonic analysis, from [17,18].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Loop Corrected Supercharges from Holomorphic Anomalies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JS3ZGI52

@misc{pith2026251207771,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Loop Corrected Supercharges from Holomorphic Anomalies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JS3ZGI52}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.07771}
}
abstract

We describe the loop corrections to supercharges in supersymmetric quantum field theories using the holomorphic twist formalism. We begin by reviewing the relation between supercharge corrections and the "twice-generalized" Konishi anomaly, which corrects the semi-chiral ring. In the holomorphic twist, these corrections appear as BRST anomalies and are computed using the higher operations of an underlying $L_\infty$ conformal algebra. We then apply this formalism to obtain the complete one-loop corrections to the supercharge of four-dimensional Lagrangian supersymmetric gauge theories, including $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM, where it admits a remarkably compact expression in terms of superfields.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 62 linked inside Pith

  1. [16]

    Budzik, D

    K. Budzik, D. Gaiotto, J. Kulp, B. R. Williams, J. Wu, and M. Yu,Semi-chiral operators in 4d N= 1 gauge theories, JHEP05(2024) 245, [arXiv:2306.01039]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [49]

    Choi and E

    J. Choi and E. Lee,Konishi lifts a black hole,arXiv:2511.09519. – 29 –

    arXiv

  3. [1]

    Seiberg,Exact results on the space of vacua of four-dimensional SUSY gauge theories, Phys

    N. Seiberg,Exact results on the space of vacua of four-dimensional SUSY gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 6857–6863, [hep-th/9402044]

    arXiv 1994

  4. [2]

    Cachazo, M

    F. Cachazo, M. R. Douglas, N. Seiberg, and E. Witten,Chiral rings and anomalies in supersymmetric gauge theory, JHEP12(2002) 071, [hep-th/0211170]

    arXiv 2002

  5. [3]

    M. F. Sohnius and P. C. West,Conformal Invariance in N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Lett. B100(1981) 245

    1981

  6. [4]

    de Wit, P

    B. de Wit, P. G. Lauwers, and A. Van Proeyen,Lagrangians of N=2 Supergravity - Matter Systems, Nucl. Phys. B255(1985) 569–608

    1985

  7. [5]

    Seiberg,Supersymmetry and Nonperturbative beta Functions, Phys

    N. Seiberg,Supersymmetry and Nonperturbative beta Functions, Phys. Lett. B206(1988) 75–80

    1988

  8. [6]

    Seiberg,Naturalness versus supersymmetric nonrenormalization theorems, Phys

    N. Seiberg,Naturalness versus supersymmetric nonrenormalization theorems, Phys. Lett. B318 (1993) 469–475, [hep-ph/9309335]

    arXiv 1993

Show all 87 references
  1. [7]

    Kutasov,A Comment on duality in N=1 supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories, Phys

    D. Kutasov,A Comment on duality in N=1 supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B351(1995) 230–234, [hep-th/9503086]. – 27 –

    1995 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Kutasov and A

    D. Kutasov and A. Schwimmer,On duality in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Lett. B 354(1995) 315–321, [hep-th/9505004]

    1995 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Kutasov, A

    D. Kutasov, A. Schwimmer, and N. Seiberg,Chiral rings, singularity theory and electric - magnetic duality, Nucl. Phys. B459(1996) 455–496, [hep-th/9510222]

    1996 arXiv

  4. [10]

    S. Lee, S. Minwalla, M. Rangamani, and N. Seiberg,Three point functions of chiral operators in D = 4, N=4 SYM at large N, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 697–718, [hep-th/9806074]

    1998 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity, Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183–386, [hep-th/9905111]

    2000 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Romelsberger,Calculating the Superconformal Index and Seiberg Duality,arXiv:0707.3702

    C. Romelsberger,Calculating the Superconformal Index and Seiberg Duality,arXiv:0707.3702

    arXiv

  7. [13]

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn,Applications of the Superconformal Index for Protected Operators and q-Hypergeometric Identities to N=1 Dual Theories, Nucl. Phys. B818(2009) 137–178, [arXiv:0801.4947]

    2009 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Eager, I

    R. Eager, I. Saberi, and J. Walcher,Nilpotence varieties, Annales Henri Poincare22(2021), no. 4 1319–1376, [arXiv:1807.03766]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Elliott, P

    C. Elliott, P. Safronov, and B. R. Williams,A taxonomy of twists of supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory, Selecta Math.28(2022), no. 4 73, [arXiv:2002.10517]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Gaiotto, J

    D. Gaiotto, J. Kulp, and J. Wu,Higher operations in perturbation theory, JHEP05(2025) 230, [arXiv:2403.13049]

    2025 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Budzik, D

    K. Budzik, D. Gaiotto, J. Kulp, J. Wu, and M. Yu,Feynman diagrams in four-dimensional holomorphic theories and the Operatope, JHEP07(2023) 127, [arXiv:2207.14321]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Bomans, N

    P. Bomans, N. Garner, B. R. Williams, and J. Wu,Unravelling the Holomorphic Twist II: Anomalies and Extended Supersymmetry,arXiv:2509.16737

  13. [20]

    Konishi,Anomalous Supersymmetry Transformation of Some Composite Operators in SQCD, Phys

    K. Konishi,Anomalous Supersymmetry Transformation of Some Composite Operators in SQCD, Phys. Lett. B135(1984) 439–444

    1984

  14. [21]

    Konishi and K.-i

    K.-i. Konishi and K.-i. Shizuya,Functional Integral Approach to Chiral Anomalies in Supersymmetric Gauge Theories, Nuovo Cim. A90(1985) 111

    1985

  15. [22]

    Z. Gui, M. Wang, and B. R. Williams,Higher-dimensional Chiral Algebras in the Jouanolou Model,arXiv:2510.26608

    arXiv

  16. [23]

    Costello,Supersymmetric gauge theory and the Yangian,arXiv:1303.2632

    K. Costello,Supersymmetric gauge theory and the Yangian,arXiv:1303.2632

    arXiv

  17. [24]

    Saberi and B

    I. Saberi and B. R. Williams,Twisted characters and holomorphic symmetries, Lett. Math. Phys.110(2020), no. 10 2779–2853, [arXiv:1906.04221]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Faonte, B

    G. Faonte, B. Hennion, and M. Kapranov,Higher kac–moody algebras and moduli spaces of g-bundles, Advances in Mathematics346(2019) 389–466, [arXiv:1701.01368]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Gwilliam and B

    O. Gwilliam and B. R. Williams,Higher Kac–Moody algebras and symmetries of holomorphic field theories, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.25(2021), no. 1 129–239, [arXiv:1810.06534]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Saberi and B

    I. Saberi and B. R. Williams,Superconformal Algebras and Holomorphic Field Theories, Annales Henri Poincare24(2023), no. 2 541–604, [arXiv:1910.04120]. – 28 –

    2023 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Bomans and J

    P. Bomans and J. Wu,Unravelling the Holomorphic Twist: Central Charges, Commun. Math. Phys.405(2024), no. 12 290, [arXiv:2311.04304]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [29]

    B. R. Williams,The local cohomology of vector fields,arXiv:2405.05174

    arXiv

  23. [30]

    Scheinpflug,The semi-chiral ring of supersymmetricϕ 4 theory as a representation, arXiv:2410.12980

    J. Scheinpflug,The semi-chiral ring of supersymmetricϕ 4 theory as a representation, arXiv:2410.12980

    arXiv

  24. [31]

    Chen and J

    H. Chen and J. Liniado,Infinite Dimensional Topological-Holomorphic Symmetry in Three-Dimensions,arXiv:2507.01858

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    Loday and D

    J.-L. Loday and D. G. Quillen,Cyclic homology and the lie algebra homology of matrices, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici59(1984) 565–591

    1984

  26. [33]

    B. L. Tsygan,The homology of matrix lie algebras over rings and the hochschild homology, Russian Mathematical Surveys38(1983) 198 – 199

    1983

  27. [34]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin,Words to describe a black hole, JHEP02(2023) 109, [arXiv:2209.06728]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [35]

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, and J. Park,The shape of non-graviton operators for SU(2), JHEP09 (2024) 029, [arXiv:2209.12696]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [36]

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park,Towards quantum black hole microstates, JHEP 11(2023) 175, [arXiv:2304.10155]. [Erratum: JHEP 03, 091 (2025)]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Budzik, H

    K. Budzik, H. Murali, and P. Vieira,Following Black Hole States,arXiv:2306.04693

    arXiv

  31. [38]

    J. Choi, S. Choi, S. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Lee,Finite N black hole cohomologies, JHEP12(2024) 029, [arXiv:2312.16443]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin,Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes, arXiv:2402.10129

    arXiv

  33. [40]

    de Mello Koch, M

    R. de Mello Koch, M. Kim, S. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Lee,Brane-fused black hole operators, JHEP 07(2025) 216, [arXiv:2412.08695]

    2025 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Gaikwad, T

    A. Gaikwad, T. Kibe, S. van Leuven, and K. Mathieson,To gauge or to double gauge? Matrix models, global symmetry, and black hole cohomologies,arXiv:2512.02103

  35. [42]

    Chang, Y

    C.-M. Chang, Y. Chen, B. S. Sia, and Z. Yang,Fortuity in SYK models, JHEP08(2025) 003, [arXiv:2412.06902]

    2025

  36. [43]

    Chen,Fortuity with a single matrix,arXiv:2511.00790

    Y. Chen,Fortuity with a single matrix,arXiv:2511.00790

  37. [44]

    Chang, Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, and H. Zhang,Fortuity in the D1-D5 system,arXiv:2501.05448

  38. [45]

    S. Kim, J. Lee, S. Lee, and H. Oh,BPS phases and fortuity in higher spin holography, arXiv:2511.03105

  39. [46]

    Chang and H

    C.-M. Chang and H. Zhang,Fortuity and R-charge concentration in the D1-D5 CFT, arXiv:2511.23294

  40. [47]

    Belin, P

    A. Belin, P. Singh, R. Vadala, and A. Zaffaroni,Fortuity in ABJM,arXiv:2512.04146

  41. [48]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin,Violation of S-duality in classicalQ-cohomology, arXiv:2510.24008

  42. [50]

    Grant, P

    L. Grant, P. A. Grassi, S. Kim, and S. Minwalla,Comments on 1/16 BPS Quantum States and Classical Configurations, JHEP05(2008) 049, [arXiv:0803.4183]

    2008 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Gadde, E

    A. Gadde, E. Lee, R. Raj, and S. Tomar,Probing Non-Graviton Spectra inN= 4SYM via BMN truncation and S-Duality,arXiv:2506.13887

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Chang and X

    C.-M. Chang and X. Yin,1/16 BPS states inN=4 super-Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013), no. 10 106005, [arXiv:1305.6314]

    2013 arXiv

  45. [53]

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees,Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys.336(2015), no. 3 1359–1433, [arXiv:1312.5344]

    2015 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Chang, Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, and J. Wu,On 1 8 -BPS black holes and the chiral algebra ofN= 4 SYM, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.28(2024), no. 7 2431–2489, [arXiv:2310.20086]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Axelrod and I

    S. Axelrod and I. M. Singer,Chern-Simons perturbation theory, in International Conference on Differential Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics, pp. 3–45, 1991.hep-th/9110056

    1991 arXiv

  48. [56]

    B. R. Williams,Renormalization for holomorphic field theories, Communications in Mathematical Physics374(2020), no. 3 1693–1742, [arXiv:1809.02661]

    2020 arXiv

  49. [57]

    V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov,Instanton Effects in Supersymmetric Theories, Nucl. Phys. B229(1983) 407

    1983

  50. [58]

    K. Hori, S. Katz, A. Klemm, R. Pandharipande, R. Thomas, C. Vafa, R. Vakil, and E. Zaslow, Mirror symmetry, vol. 1 of Clay mathematics monographs. AMS, Providence, USA, 2003

    2003

  51. [59]

    Witten,Chiral ring of Sp(N) and SO(N) supersymmetric gauge theory in four-dimensions, hep-th/0302194

    E. Witten,Chiral ring of Sp(N) and SO(N) supersymmetric gauge theory in four-dimensions, hep-th/0302194

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Etingof and V

    P. Etingof and V. Kac,On the Cachazo-Douglas-Seiberg-Witten conjecture for simple Lie algebras,math/0305175

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Cederwall and G

    M. Cederwall and G. Ferretti,The Chiral Ring of D=4, N=1 SYM with Exceptional Gauge Groups, Fortsch. Phys.72(2024), no. 5 2400027, [arXiv:2311.12119]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Dorey, T

    N. Dorey, T. J. Hollowood, V. V. Khoze, and M. P. Mattis,The Calculus of many instantons, Phys. Rept.371(2002) 231–459, [hep-th/0206063]

    2002 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Argurio, G

    R. Argurio, G. Ferretti, and R. Heise,An Introduction to supersymmetric gauge theories and matrix models, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A19(2004) 2015–2078, [hep-th/0311066]

    2004 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Seiberg,Adding fundamental matter to ‘Chiral rings and anomalies in supersymmetric gauge theory’, JHEP01(2003) 061, [hep-th/0212225]

    N. Seiberg,Adding fundamental matter to ‘Chiral rings and anomalies in supersymmetric gauge theory’, JHEP01(2003) 061, [hep-th/0212225]

    2003 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Tachikawa,Lectures on 4d N=1 dynamics and related topics,arXiv:1812.08946

    Y. Tachikawa,Lectures on 4d N=1 dynamics and related topics,arXiv:1812.08946

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    T. T. Dumitrescu and N. Seiberg,Supercurrents and Brane Currents in Diverse Dimensions, JHEP07(2011) 095, [arXiv:1106.0031]

    2011 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Closset, T

    C. Closset, T. T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia, and Z. Komargodski,The Geometry of Supersymmetric Partition Functions, JHEP01(2014) 124, [arXiv:1309.5876]

    2014 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Closset, T

    C. Closset, T. T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia, and Z. Komargodski,From Rigid Supersymmetry to Twisted Holomorphic Theories, Phys. Rev. D90(2014), no. 8 085006, [arXiv:1407.2598]. – 30 –

    2014 arXiv

  61. [69]

    T. T. Dumitrescu,An introduction to supersymmetric field theories in curved space, J. Phys. A 50(2016), no. 44 443005, [arXiv:1608.02957]

    2016 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Yonekura,Notes on Operator Equations of Supercurrent Multiplets and Anomaly Puzzle in Supersymmetric Field Theories, JHEP09(2010) 049, [arXiv:1004.1296]

    K. Yonekura,Notes on Operator Equations of Supercurrent Multiplets and Anomaly Puzzle in Supersymmetric Field Theories, JHEP09(2010) 049, [arXiv:1004.1296]

    2010 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Scheinpflug, M

    J. Scheinpflug, M. Schnabl, and J. Voˇ smera,Observables of boundary RG flows from string field theory,arXiv:2510.07155

  64. [72]

    Witten and B

    E. Witten and B. Zwiebach,Algebraic structures and differential geometry in 2-D string theory, Nucl. Phys. B377(1992) 55–112, [hep-th/9201056]

    1992 arXiv

  65. [73]

    B. H. Lian and G. J. Zuckerman,New perspectives on the BRST algebraic structure of string theory, Commun. Math. Phys.154(1993) 613–646, [hep-th/9211072]

    1993 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Getzler,Batalin-Vilkovisky algebras and two-dimensional topological field theories, Commun

    E. Getzler,Batalin-Vilkovisky algebras and two-dimensional topological field theories, Commun. Math. Phys.159(1994) 265–285, [hep-th/9212043]

    1994 arXiv

  67. [75]

    C. Beem, D. Ben-Zvi, M. Bullimore, T. Dimofte, and A. Neitzke,Secondary products in supersymmetric field theory, Annales Henri Poincare21(2020), no. 4 1235–1310, [arXiv:1809.00009]

    2020 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Oh and J

    J. Oh and J. Yagi,Poisson vertex algebras in supersymmetric field theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 110(2020), no. 8 2245–2275, [arXiv:1908.05791]

    2020 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Garner and N

    N. Garner and N. M. Paquette,Mathematics of String Dualities, PoST ASI2021(2023) 007, [arXiv:2204.01914]

    2023 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Gaiotto, G

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and E. Witten,Algebra of the Infrared: String Field Theoretic Structures in MassiveN= (2,2)Field Theory In Two Dimensions,arXiv:1506.04087

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Wang,Feynman Graph Integrals onC d, Commun

    M. Wang,Feynman Graph Integrals onC d, Commun. Math. Phys.406(2025), no. 5 116, [arXiv:2401.08113]

    2025

  72. [80]

    Balduf and D

    P.-H. Balduf and D. Gaiotto,Combinatorial proof of a non-renormalization theorem, JHEP05 (2025) 120, [arXiv:2408.03192]

    2025 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Wang and B

    M. Wang and B. R. Williams,Factorization algebras from topological-holomorphic field theories, arXiv:2407.08667

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    Wang and J

    M. Wang and J. Yan,Feynman Graph Integrals on K¨ ahler Manifolds,arXiv:2507.09170

  75. [83]

    Henneberg, Die graphische Statik der starren Systeme, vol

    L. Henneberg, Die graphische Statik der starren Systeme, vol. 31. BG Teubner, 1911

    1911

  76. [84]

    Pollaczek-Geiringer, ¨Uber die gliederung ebener fachwerke, ZAMM-Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift f¨ urAngewandte Mathematik und Mechanik7(1927), no

    H. Pollaczek-Geiringer, ¨Uber die gliederung ebener fachwerke, ZAMM-Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift f¨ urAngewandte Mathematik und Mechanik7(1927), no. 1 58–72

    1927

  77. [85]

    Laman,On graphs and rigidity of plane skeletal structures, Journal of Engineering mathematics4(1970), no

    G. Laman,On graphs and rigidity of plane skeletal structures, Journal of Engineering mathematics4(1970), no. 4 331–340

    1970

  78. [86]

    Johansen,Twisting ofN= 1SUSY gauge theories and heterotic topological theories, Int

    A. Johansen,Twisting ofN= 1SUSY gauge theories and heterotic topological theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A10(1995) 4325–4358, [hep-th/9403017]

    1995 arXiv

  79. [87]

    K. J. Costello,Notes on supersymmetric and holomorphic field theories in dimensions 2 and 4, Pure Appl. Math. Quart.09(2013), no. 1 73–165, [arXiv:1111.4234]. – 31 –

    2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.