pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.09079 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-09 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Curvaton-assisted hilltop inflation

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 23:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords curvatonhilltop inflationinitial conditionssub-Planckian fieldscurvature perturbationspower spectrumACT observations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coupling the inflaton to a curvaton relaxes the extreme initial tuning in hilltop inflation and revives the quartic model for sub-Planckian field values.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines hilltop inflation in light of recent ACT data, where the inflaton potential has a flat maximum that normally demands the field starts extremely close to the top. By adding a curvaton field that couples to the inflaton, the initial conditions become far less tuned because the curvaton can dominate the curvature perturbations after inflation. This coupling also reshapes the power spectrum of those perturbations, opening viable parameter space for the quartic hilltop potential even when the inflaton stays below the Planck scale. The resulting models produce predictions consistent with current observations of the spectral index and amplitude.

Core claim

The curvaton field not only significantly relaxes the initial-value tuning required for hilltop inflation, but also opens up parameter space through modifying the curvature perturbation power spectrum, reviving the quartic hilltop inflation model in the sub-Planckian regime. Viable parameter space is found that remains consistent with recent cosmological observations.

What carries the argument

Curvaton field coupled to the inflaton, which takes over production of curvature perturbations after the end of inflation and thereby alters their power spectrum.

If this is right

  • The inflaton can begin farther from the potential maximum without preventing enough e-folds of inflation.
  • The quartic hilltop potential, previously ruled out in single-field sub-Planckian setups, now yields observationally allowed spectra.
  • The model remains compatible with the latest ACT constraints on the scalar spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio.
  • The curvaton decay must occur after horizon exit but before it affects late-time cosmology, which restricts the allowed mass range.
  • Non-Gaussianity parameters stay within current bounds provided the curvaton energy density fraction at decay is chosen appropriately.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar curvaton assistance could relax initial-condition problems in other single-field models that suffer from flat-top tuning, such as certain Starobinsky variants.
  • Future measurements of local non-Gaussianity f_NL could directly constrain the curvaton energy fraction at decay and thereby test the coupling strength.
  • The approach suggests a general route for embedding sub-Planckian inflation into UV-complete theories where super-Planckian excursions are forbidden.
  • One could test whether the same coupling also suppresses isocurvature modes enough to satisfy Planck bounds on cold dark matter isocurvature.

Load-bearing premise

A suitable curvaton-inflaton coupling exists that lets the curvaton dominate curvature perturbations, adjust the spectrum as needed, and decay without introducing large non-Gaussianities or disrupting slow-roll.

What would settle it

A concrete mismatch between the predicted curvature power spectrum amplitude or spectral index and future high-precision measurements (such as from CMB-S4 or LiteBIRD) for all choices of coupling strength and curvaton mass would rule out the mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.09079 by Stephen F. King, Wen-Yuan Ai, Xin Wang, Ye-Ling Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Comparison between the stochastic paths of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Relations between the tensor-to-scalar ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Following the recent Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) results, we consider hilltop inflation where the inflaton is coupled to a curvaton, simultaneously addressing two main challenges faced by conventional hilltop inflation models: the initial-value problem; and their viability for sub-Planckian field values. In standard single-field hilltop inflation, the inflaton must start extremely close to the maximum of the potential, raising concerns about the naturalness of the initial conditions. We demonstrate that the curvaton field not only significantly relaxes the initial-value tuning required for hilltop inflation, but also opens up parameter space through modifying the curvature perturbation power spectrum, reviving the quartic hilltop inflation model in the sub-Planckian regime. We find viable parameter space consistent with the recent cosmological observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that coupling a curvaton to the inflaton in hilltop inflation relaxes the extreme initial-value tuning near the potential maximum and modifies the curvature perturbation power spectrum, thereby reviving the quartic hilltop model for sub-Planckian field values and yielding viable parameter space consistent with recent ACT observations.

Significance. If the central claims hold after explicit verification, the work would be significant for inflationary model building: it directly addresses the initial-conditions naturalness issue in hilltop inflation and reopens a class of simple quartic potentials that had been disfavored by super-Planckian requirements and tuning, potentially broadening the set of observationally viable single-field-like scenarios.

major comments (2)
  1. [main text (power-spectrum and parameter-space sections)] The central claim that the curvaton modifies the curvature perturbation power spectrum to open viable sub-Planckian parameter space is not supported by any explicit derivation of the modified P_ζ(k) from the coupled inflaton-curvaton equations of motion or from the decay dynamics; without this step the assertion that a suitable coupling window exists remains unverified.
  2. [parameter-space discussion] No simultaneous error budget or exclusion plot is supplied showing that the required curvaton-inflaton coupling strength satisfies the observed amplitude, slow-roll conditions, and current f_NL/isocurvature bounds at the same time; the viability statement therefore rests on an unshown assumption that such a non-empty window exists.
minor comments (1)
  1. The specific form of the curvaton-inflaton coupling (e.g., λ ϕ² σ² or similar) should be stated explicitly at first use, together with the regime in which the curvaton is assumed to dominate the perturbations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We appreciate the feedback highlighting the need for greater explicitness in our derivations and parameter-space analysis. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested improvements in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [main text (power-spectrum and parameter-space sections)] The central claim that the curvaton modifies the curvature perturbation power spectrum to open viable sub-Planckian parameter space is not supported by any explicit derivation of the modified P_ζ(k) from the coupled inflaton-curvaton equations of motion or from the decay dynamics; without this step the assertion that a suitable coupling window exists remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would be strengthened by an explicit step-by-step derivation of the modified P_ζ(k). In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection that starts from the coupled equations of motion for the inflaton and curvaton, incorporates the decay dynamics, and arrives at the resulting curvature power spectrum. This will explicitly demonstrate the existence of the viable coupling window for sub-Planckian quartic hilltop inflation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [parameter-space discussion] No simultaneous error budget or exclusion plot is supplied showing that the required curvaton-inflaton coupling strength satisfies the observed amplitude, slow-roll conditions, and current f_NL/isocurvature bounds at the same time; the viability statement therefore rests on an unshown assumption that such a non-empty window exists.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a joint error budget and exclusion plot is required to robustly establish viability. The revised manuscript will include a comprehensive parameter-space scan together with exclusion plots that simultaneously enforce the observed amplitude, slow-roll conditions, and current f_NL and isocurvature bounds. These will confirm the existence of a non-empty window for the curvaton-inflaton coupling. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard multi-field dynamics and parameter search

full rationale

The paper's core claims rest on introducing a curvaton-inflaton coupling to relax initial conditions for hilltop inflation and to modify the curvature power spectrum, then scanning parameters to identify regions consistent with ACT and other data. No quoted equation or step reduces a 'prediction' to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors. The viability statement is an explicit numerical search over couplings and initial values, which is the standard non-circular procedure for such models; the derivation chain remains self-contained against external cosmological constraints.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on standard slow-roll and curvaton-decay assumptions plus a new coupling parameter whose value is chosen to fit the observed spectrum; no independent evidence is given for the coupling strength.

free parameters (1)
  • curvaton-inflaton coupling strength
    Adjusted to control the curvaton's contribution to the curvature perturbation spectrum and to open viable regions for the quartic potential.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Slow-roll approximation governs the inflationary dynamics
    Invoked for the hilltop potential evolution.
  • domain assumption Curvaton decays after inflation and sources the observed curvature perturbations
    Core assumption of curvaton models used here to modify the power spectrum.
invented entities (1)
  • curvaton field with inflaton coupling no independent evidence
    purpose: To relax initial conditions and alter the perturbation spectrum
    Postulated new interaction not derived from prior literature; no independent falsifiable prediction supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5428 in / 1427 out tokens · 36994 ms · 2026-05-16T23:40:43.039196+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    *”, and a uniform-density slice whereδρ= 0 as the final hypersurface, labeled by “f

    for thecubicandquartichilltop models, respectively, both of which lie outside the 95% C.L. regions in the latest Planck [2] and ACT [8] results. B. The curvaton mechanism The above picture can change if we introduce a curva- ton fieldσ[36–40]. Sincem σ ≪Hduring inflation, the curvaton is effectively frozen atσ ∗. Its quantum fluctua- tions at the horizon ...

  2. [2]

    Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(Planck), “Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys.571, A22 (2014), arXiv:1303.5082 [astro-ph.CO]

  3. [3]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

  4. [4]

    Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), “Planck 2018 results. IX. Con- straints on primordial non-Gaussianity,” Astron. Astro- phys.641, A9 (2020), arXiv:1905.05697 [astro-ph.CO]

  5. [5]

    A New Type of Isotropic Cosmo- logical Models Without Singularity,

    Alexei A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmo- logical Models Without Singularity,” Phys. Lett. B91, 99–102 (1980)

  6. [6]

    The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,

    Alan H. Guth, “The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,” Phys. Rev. D23, 347–356 (1981)

  7. [7]

    A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogene- ity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,

    Andrei D. Linde, “A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogene- ity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,” Phys. Lett. B108, 389–393 (1982)

  8. [8]

    Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,

    Andreas Albrecht and Paul J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,” Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1220–1223 (1982)

  9. [9]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters

    Thibaut Louiset al.(ACT), “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and ΛCDM Parameters,” (2025), arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

  10. [10]

    Kallosh, A

    Renata Kallosh, Andrei Linde, and Diederik Roest, “ACT, SPT, and chaotic inflation,” (2025), arXiv:2503.21030 [hep-th]

  11. [11]

    Higgs-modular inflation,

    Shuntaro Aoki, Hajime Otsuka, and Ryota Yanagita, “Higgs-modular inflation,” Phys. Rev. D112, 043505 (2025), arXiv:2504.01622 [hep-ph]

  12. [12]

    The early universe isACT-ingwarm,

    Arjun Berera, Suddhasattwa Brahma, Zizang Qiu, Rud- nei O. Ramos, and Gabriel S. Rodrigues, “The early universe isACT-ingwarm,” (2025), arXiv:2504.02655 [hep-th]

  13. [13]

    Fractional attractors in light of the latest ACT observations,

    Christian Dioguardi, Antonio J. Iovino, and Antonio Racioppi, “Fractional attractors in light of the latest ACT observations,” Phys. Lett. B868, 139664 (2025), arXiv:2504.02809 [gr-qc]

  14. [14]

    Has ACT measured ra- diative corrections to the tree-level Higgs-like inflation?

    Ioannis D. Gialamas, Alexandros Karam, Antonio Racioppi, and Martti Raidal, “Has ACT measured ra- diative corrections to the tree-level Higgs-like inflation?” (2025), arXiv:2504.06002 [astro-ph.CO]

  15. [15]

    Independent connection in action dur- ing inflation,

    Alberto Salvio, “Independent connection in action dur- ing inflation,” Phys. Rev. D112, L061301 (2025), 14 arXiv:2504.10488 [hep-ph]

  16. [16]

    Palatini linear attractors are back in action,

    Christian Dioguardi and Alexandros Karam, “Palatini linear attractors are back in action,” Phys. Rev. D111, 123521 (2025), arXiv:2504.12937 [gr-qc]

  17. [17]

    Increase of ns in regularized pole inflation & Einstein-Cartan gravity,

    Minxi He, Muzi Hong, and Kyohei Mukaida, “Increase of ns in regularized pole inflation & Einstein-Cartan gravity,” JCAP09, 080 (2025), arXiv:2504.16069 [astro- ph.CO]

  18. [18]

    Refined predictions for Starobinsky inflation and post-inflationary constraints in light of ACT,

    Manuel Drees and Yong Xu, “Refined predictions for Starobinsky inflation and post-inflationary constraints in light of ACT,” Phys. Lett. B867, 139612 (2025), arXiv:2504.20757 [astro-ph.CO]

  19. [19]

    Enhancement of primordial curvature perturbations in R 3-corrected Starobinsky-Higgs infla- tion,

    Jinsu Kim, Xinpeng Wang, Ying-li Zhang, and Zhongzhou Ren, “Enhancement of primordial curvature perturbations in R 3-corrected Starobinsky-Higgs infla- tion,” JCAP09, 011 (2025), arXiv:2504.12035 [astro- ph.CO]

  20. [20]

    How accidental was inflation?

    Ignatios Antoniadis, John Ellis, Wenqi Ke, Dimitri V. Nanopoulos, and Keith A. Olive, “How accidental was inflation?” JCAP08, 090 (2025), arXiv:2504.12283 [hep- ph]

  21. [21]

    Reconciling Nonminimally Coupled Higgs Inflation with ACT DR6 Observations through Reheating

    Lang Liu, Zhu Yi, and Yungui Gong, “Reconciling Higgs Inflation with ACT Observations through Reheating,” (2025), arXiv:2505.02407 [astro-ph.CO]

  22. [22]

    Reheat- ing ACTs on Starobinsky and Higgs inflation,

    D. S. Zharov, O. O. Sobol, and S. I. Vilchinskii, “Reheat- ing ACTs on Starobinsky and Higgs inflation,” (2025), arXiv:2505.01129 [astro-ph.CO]

  23. [23]

    Starobinsky like inflation and EGB Gravity in the light of ACT,

    Yogesh, Abolhassan Mohammadi, Qiang Wu, and Tao Zhu, “Starobinsky like inflation and EGB Gravity in the light of ACT,” JCAP10, 010 (2025), arXiv:2505.05363 [astro-ph.CO]

  24. [24]

    Curvature corrections to Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT results,

    Andrea Addazi, Yermek Aldabergenov, and Sergei V. Ketov, “Curvature corrections to Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT results,” Phys. Lett. B869, 139883 (2025), arXiv:2505.10305 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    Higgs-like inflation ACTivated mass,

    Wen Yin, “Higgs-like inflation ACTivated mass,” JCAP 09, 062 (2025), arXiv:2505.03004 [hep-ph]

  26. [26]

    The curvaton ACTs again,

    Christian T. Byrnes, Marina Cortˆ es, and An- drew R. Liddle, “The curvaton ACTs again,” (2025), arXiv:2505.09682 [astro-ph.CO]

  27. [27]

    Higgs pole inflation with loop corrections in light of ACT results

    Jeonghak Han, Hyun Min Lee, and Jun-Ho Song, “Higgs pole inflation with loop corrections in light of ACT re- sults,” (2025), arXiv:2506.21189 [hep-ph]

  28. [28]

    Power Law Plateau Inflation and Primary Gravitational Waves in the light of ACT,

    Abolhassan Mohammadi, Yogesh, and Anzhong Wang, “Power Law Plateau Inflation and Primary Gravitational Waves in the light of ACT,” (2025), arXiv:2507.06544 [astro-ph.CO]

  29. [29]

    ACT Implications for Hilltop Inflation,

    Monika Lynker and Rolf Schimmrigk, “ACT Implications for Hilltop Inflation,” (2025), arXiv:2507.15076 [astro- ph.CO]

  30. [30]

    Chaotic Inflation RIDES Again,

    Venus Keus and Stephen F. King, “Chaotic Inflation RIDES Again,” (2025), arXiv:2511.05799 [hep-ph]

  31. [31]

    Natural New Inflation in Broken Supergravity

    K. I. Izawa and T. Yanagida, “Natural new inflation in broken supergravity,” Phys. Lett. B393, 331–336 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9608359

  32. [32]

    New inflation, preinflation, and leptogenesis

    Vedat Nefer Senoguz and Q. Shafi, “New inflation, pre- inflation, and leptogenesis,” Phys. Lett. B596, 8–15 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0403294

  33. [33]

    Hilltop Inflation

    Lotfi Boubekeur and David. H. Lyth, “Hilltop inflation,” JCAP07, 010 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0502047

  34. [34]

    Modular invariant hill- top inflation,

    Stephen F. King and Xin Wang, “Modular invariant hill- top inflation,” JCAP07, 073 (2024), arXiv:2405.08924 [hep-ph]

  35. [35]

    Modu- lar invariant slow roll inflation,

    Gui-Jun Ding, Si-Yi Jiang, and Wenbin Zhao, “Modu- lar invariant slow roll inflation,” JCAP10, 016 (2024), arXiv:2405.06497 [hep-ph]

  36. [36]

    Hilltop inflation with preinflation from coupling to matter fields

    Stefan Antusch, David Nolde, and Stefano Orani, “Hill- top inflation with preinflation from coupling to matter fields,” JCAP05, 034 (2014), arXiv:1402.5328 [hep-ph]

  37. [37]

    Non- gaussian isocurvature perturbations from inflation,

    Andrei D. Linde and Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov, “Non- gaussian isocurvature perturbations from inflation,” Phys. Rev. D56, R535–R539 (1997), arXiv:astro- ph/9610219

  38. [38]

    Generating the curvature perturbation without an inflaton

    David H. Lyth and David Wands, “Generating the cur- vature perturbation without an inflaton,” Phys. Lett. B 524, 5–14 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0110002

  39. [39]

    Effects of cos- mological moduli fields on cosmic microwave back- ground,

    Takeo Moroi and Tomo Takahashi, “Effects of cos- mological moduli fields on cosmic microwave back- ground,” Phys. Lett. B522, 215–221 (2001), [Erra- tum: Phys.Lett.B 539, 303–303 (2002)], arXiv:hep- ph/0110096

  40. [40]

    Cosmic Density Perturbations from Late-Decaying Scalar Condensations

    Takeo Moroi and Tomo Takahashi, “Cosmic density perturbations from late decaying scalar condensations,” Phys. Rev. D66, 063501 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0206026

  41. [41]

    The Primordial density perturbation in the curvaton scenario,

    David H. Lyth, Carlo Ungarelli, and David Wands, “The Primordial density perturbation in the curvaton scenario,” Phys. Rev. D67, 023503 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0208055

  42. [42]

    Equilibrium State of a Massless Self-Interacting Scalar Field in the De Sitter Background

    Alexei A. Starobinsky and Junichi Yokoyama, “Equilib- rium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sit- ter background,” Phys. Rev. D50, 6357–6368 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9407016

  43. [43]

    Spectator field dynamics in de Sitter and curvaton initial conditions

    Kari Enqvist, Rose N. Lerner, Olli Taanila, and An- ders Tranberg, “Spectator field dynamics in de Sitter and curvaton initial conditions,” JCAP10, 052 (2012), arXiv:1205.5446 [astro-ph.CO]

  44. [44]

    The stochastic spectator

    Robert J. Hardwick, Vincent Vennin, Christian T. Byrnes, Jes´ us Torrado, and David Wands, “The stochas- tic spectator,” JCAP10, 018 (2017), arXiv:1701.06473 [astro-ph.CO]

  45. [45]

    Eternally Existing Selfreproducing Chaotic Inflationary Universe,

    Andrei D. Linde, “Eternally Existing Selfreproducing Chaotic Inflationary Universe,” Phys. Lett. B175, 395– 400 (1986)

  46. [46]

    Conditions for (No) Eternal Inflation,

    Tom Rudelius, “Conditions for (No) Eternal Inflation,” JCAP08, 009 (2019), arXiv:1905.05198 [hep-th]

  47. [47]

    Vacuum stability, wormholes, cosmic rays and the cosmological bounds on m(t) and m(H),

    John R. Ellis, Andrei D. Linde, and Marc Sher, “Vacuum stability, wormholes, cosmic rays and the cosmological bounds on m(t) and m(H),” Phys. Lett. B252, 203–211 (1990)

  48. [48]

    Hard art of the universe creation (stochastic approach to tunneling and baby universe for- mation),

    Andrei D. Linde, “Hard art of the universe creation (stochastic approach to tunneling and baby universe for- mation),” Nucl. Phys. B372, 421–442 (1992), arXiv:hep- th/9110037

  49. [49]

    Cosmological implications of the Higgs mass measurement

    J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, and A. Riotto, “Cos- mological implications of the Higgs mass measurement,” JCAP05, 002 (2008), arXiv:0710.2484 [hep-ph]

  50. [50]

    Stochastic inflation with an extremely large number ofe-folds,

    Naoya Kitajima, Yuichiro Tada, and Fuminobu Taka- hashi, “Stochastic inflation with an extremely large number ofe-folds,” Phys. Lett. B800, 135097 (2020), arXiv:1908.08694 [hep-ph]

  51. [51]

    Primordial black holes from stochastic tunnelling,

    Chiara Animali and Vincent Vennin, “Primordial black holes from stochastic tunnelling,” JCAP02, 043 (2023), arXiv:2210.03812 [astro-ph.CO]

  52. [52]

    Improved Con- straints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(BICEP, Keck), “Improved Con- straints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 151301 (2021), arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]. 15

  53. [53]

    A General Analytic Formula for the Spectral Index of the Density Perturbations produced during Inflation

    Misao Sasaki and Ewan D. Stewart, “A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturba- tions produced during inflation,” Prog. Theor. Phys.95, 71–78 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9507001

  54. [54]

    The inflationary prediction for primordial non-gaussianity

    David H. Lyth and Yeinzon Rodriguez, “The Inflationary prediction for primordial non-Gaussianity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 121302 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0504045

  55. [55]

    Acoustic Signatures in the Primary Microwave Background Bispectrum

    Eiichiro Komatsu and David N. Spergel, “Acoustic signa- tures in the primary microwave background bispectrum,” Phys. Rev. D63, 063002 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0005036

  56. [56]

    Non-Gaussianity from Inflation: Theory and Observations

    N. Bartolo, E. Komatsu, Sabino Matarrese, and A. Riotto, “Non-Gaussianity from inflation: Theory and observations,” Phys. Rept.402, 103–266 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0406398

  57. [57]

    Primordial Non-Gaussianities from Inflation Models

    Xingang Chen, “Primordial Non-Gaussianities from In- flation Models,” Adv. Astron.2010, 638979 (2010), arXiv:1002.1416 [astro-ph.CO]

  58. [58]

    Probing Cosmic Infla- tion with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey,

    E. Allyset al.(LiteBIRD), “Probing Cosmic Infla- tion with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey,” PTEP2023, 042F01 (2023), arXiv:2202.02773 [astro-ph.IM]

  59. [59]

    Snowmass2021 Cosmic Fron- tier: Cosmic Microwave Background Measurements White Paper,

    Clarence L. Changet al., “Snowmass2021 Cosmic Fron- tier: Cosmic Microwave Background Measurements White Paper,” (2022), arXiv:2203.07638 [astro-ph.CO]

  60. [60]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models

    Erminia Calabreseet al.(Atacama Cosmology Tele- scope), “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 con- straints on extended cosmological models,” JCAP11, 063 (2025), arXiv:2503.14454 [astro-ph.CO]

  61. [61]

    STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNI- VERSE,

    Alexei A. Starobinsky, “STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNI- VERSE,” Lect. Notes Phys.246, 107–126 (1986)

  62. [62]

    A general proof of the conservation of the curvature perturbation

    David H. Lyth, Karim A. Malik, and Misao Sasaki, “A General proof of the conservation of the curvature pertur- bation,” JCAP05, 004 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0411220