pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.10530 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-11 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Cosmological and lunar laser ranging constraints on evolving dark energy in a nonminimally coupled curvature-matter gravity model

Riccardo March , Miguel Barroso Varela , Orfeu Bertolami , Giada Bargiacchi , Marco Muccino , Simone Dell'Agnello
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 23:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.CO
keywords nonminimal couplingmodified gravitydark energylunar laser rangingDESIequivalence principlescalar fieldcosmological constraints
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonminimally coupled curvature-matter gravity allows dynamical dark energy consistent with DESI results and lunar ranging limits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper analyzes a modified gravity model in which curvature and matter are nonminimally coupled. The accelerated expansion is driven by a cosmological constant, but the coupling is recast as an effective equation of state for evolving dark energy under a tracking solution for a scalar field. Cosmological constraints are obtained from DESI collaboration data combined with Pantheon+ and Dark Energy Survey supernovae compilations, which indicate dynamical dark energy behavior. These constraints are intersected with lunar laser ranging limits on the fifth force that violates the equivalence principle in the Earth-Moon system. A variety of model parameters remain viable while producing dynamical evolution similar to recent DESI findings.

Core claim

In this nonminimally coupled gravity model the current accelerated expansion is driven by a cosmological constant while the impact of the nonminimal coupling on the expansion history is recast as an effective equation of state for evolving dark energy. The model is analyzed under a tracking solution that follows the minimum of the effective potential for a scalar field that captures the modified theory's effects. Cosmological constraints from recent DESI outcomes in combination with Pantheon+ and Dark Energy Survey supernovae compilations point to dynamical dark energy. Intersecting these with limits from lunar laser ranging tests of the equivalence principle violation shows that a variety 0

What carries the argument

Tracking solution that follows the minimum of the effective potential for the scalar field capturing the modified theory's effects

If this is right

  • The nonminimal coupling produces an effective equation of state for evolving dark energy.
  • Recent DESI data combined with supernova compilations constrain the model parameters toward dynamical behavior.
  • The model generates a fifth force that violates the equivalence principle, tested in the Earth-Moon system.
  • Lunar laser ranging limits intersect with cosmological constraints to leave a range of viable parameters.
  • The resulting dark energy evolution shows similarities to that indicated by recent DESI results.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future higher-precision lunar ranging could further restrict the allowed parameter space.
  • The same coupling mechanism could be checked against other datasets such as galaxy clustering or weak lensing.
  • Next-generation cosmological surveys may distinguish the model's evolving dark energy from a pure cosmological constant.

Load-bearing premise

The validity of the tracking solution that follows the minimum of the effective potential for the scalar field capturing the modified theory's effects, together with the conditions for its existence.

What would settle it

A lunar laser ranging measurement showing a differential acceleration of Earth and Moon toward the Sun outside the range permitted by the model's consistent parameters, or cosmological data that rules out any dynamical evolution in the effective dark energy equation of state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.10530 by Giada Bargiacchi, Marco Muccino, Miguel Barroso Varela, Orfeu Bertolami, Riccardo March, Simone Dell'Agnello.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The properties of the critical points of the effective [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Effective potential of the scalar field η for various densities of non-relativistic matter ρ (or equivalent redshifts) in the m = −3 NMC model with µ 1/|m| = −4R0, R0 being the curvature due to matter at present time. The cosmological constant is taken to be such that ΩΛ = 0.7 and the potentials are shown in arbitrary units to focus on their relative magni￾tude. The location of the minimum of each potentia… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Allowed {ρ0, Λ} parameter space for a fixed expo￾nent m = −3, NMC scale |µ| 1/|m| = 7500 (km/s/Mpc)2 and ε = 10−2 , with H0 = 70 km/s/Mpc having been fixed for this plot. By increasing |µ|, the disallowed (red) region is in￾creased, as expected. The H(0) = H0 constraint for the NMC model is shown in blue, showing its deviation from ΛCDM (dashed) as the Universe becomes more dynamical with an increasing dom… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Constraints on cosmological parameters for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Constraints on the effective dark energy equation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Constraints from cosmological data on the NMC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We analyze a cosmological solution to the field equations of a modified gravity model where curvature and matter are nonminimally coupled. The current Universe's accelerated expansion is driven by a cosmological constant while the impact of the nonminimal coupling on the expansion history is recast as an effective equation of state for evolving dark energy. The model is analyzed under a tracking solution that follows the minimum of the effective potential for a scalar field that captures the modified theory's effects. We determine the conditions for the existence of this minimum and for the validity of the tracking solution. Cosmological constraints on the parameters of the model are obtained by resorting to recent outcomes of data from the DESI collaboration in combination with the Pantheon+ and Dark Energy Survey supernovae compilations, which give compatible results that point to the presence of a dynamical behavior for dark energy. The gravity model violates the equivalence principle since it gives rise to a fifth force that implies the Earth and Moon fall differently towards the Sun. The cosmological constraints are intersected with limits resulting from a test of the equivalence principle in the Earth-Moon system based on lunar laser ranging data. We find that a variety of model parameters are consistent with both of these constraints, all while producing a dynamical evolution of dark energy with similarities to that found in recent DESI results.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes a nonminimally coupled curvature-matter gravity model in which the nonminimal term is recast as an effective evolving dark energy equation of state. Under a tracking solution that follows the minimum of an effective scalar-field potential, the authors derive conditions for the minimum's existence and tracking validity, obtain cosmological constraints from DESI, Pantheon+, and DES data, intersect them with lunar laser ranging limits on the equivalence-principle violation, and report that a range of parameters remains viable while producing DESI-like dynamical dark energy.

Significance. If the tracking solution is shown to hold for the jointly constrained parameters, the work supplies a concrete modified-gravity mechanism that simultaneously accommodates recent indications of dynamical dark energy and passes local fifth-force tests, thereby offering an independent theoretical interpretation of the DESI results.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (tracking solution and effective potential): the conditions for the existence of the minimum and the validity of the tracking solution are stated, yet the manuscript does not verify that these conditions remain satisfied for the specific parameter values that survive the intersection of the cosmological (DESI+Pantheon+DES) and lunar-laser-ranging constraints performed in §5. Without this check the claimed effective equation of state and the reported dynamical evolution do not necessarily apply to the viable models.
  2. [§4] §4 (cosmological constraints): the fitting procedure, likelihood construction, error propagation, and any post-hoc selections used to obtain the cosmological bounds are not described quantitatively, so the robustness of the claimed compatibility with DESI-like evolution cannot be assessed from the text.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'a variety of model parameters' are consistent but does not report the numerical ranges or example points that survive both datasets.
  2. Notation for the nonminimal coupling function and the scalar-field potential should be defined explicitly at first use rather than only in an appendix.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested verifications and details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3 (tracking solution and effective potential): the conditions for the existence of the minimum and the validity of the tracking solution are stated, yet the manuscript does not verify that these conditions remain satisfied for the specific parameter values that survive the intersection of the cosmological (DESI+Pantheon+DES) and lunar-laser-ranging constraints performed in §5. Without this check the claimed effective equation of state and the reported dynamical evolution do not necessarily apply to the viable models.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit check is required. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) at the end of §5 that substitutes the best-fit values and the 1σ/2σ ranges obtained from the joint cosmological plus lunar-laser-ranging constraints into the analytic conditions derived in §3. We will report the numerical values of the relevant inequalities and confirm that the minimum exists and the tracking regime remains valid throughout the allowed parameter volume. This verification will be performed for both the DESI+Pantheon+ and DESI+DES combinations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4 (cosmological constraints): the fitting procedure, likelihood construction, error propagation, and any post-hoc selections used to obtain the cosmological bounds are not described quantitatively, so the robustness of the claimed compatibility with DESI-like evolution cannot be assessed from the text.

    Authors: We acknowledge that §4 currently presents the final bounds without a fully quantitative description of the statistical pipeline. In the revision we will expand §4 to include: (i) the explicit form of the likelihood (χ² for each dataset and the total χ²), (ii) the sampling method (MCMC settings or grid resolution), (iii) how parameter uncertainties are propagated from the posterior, and (iv) any post-hoc cuts applied to ensure physical viability. These additions will make the robustness of the reported compatibility with DESI-like evolution directly verifiable from the text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Effective dark energy EoS defined by recasting nonminimal coupling; tracking solution parameters fitted to DESI-motivated data

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "the impact of the nonminimal coupling on the expansion history is recast as an effective equation of state for evolving dark energy"

    The effective EoS is obtained directly by algebraic recasting of the coupling term, so any dynamical evolution it exhibits is a definitional consequence of the model rather than an independent derivation from first principles or external data.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "We determine the conditions for the existence of this minimum and for the validity of the tracking solution. Cosmological constraints on the parameters of the model are obtained by resorting to recent outcomes of data from the DESI collaboration in combination with the Pantheon+ and Dark Energy Survey supernovae compilations, which give compatible results that point to the presence of a dynamical behavior for dark energy."

    Parameters of the tracking solution are constrained by fitting to the same DESI+Pantheon+ data that already favor dynamical dark energy; the resulting 'dynamical evolution with similarities to DESI' is therefore statistically encouraged by the input data choice rather than predicted from the model alone.

full rationale

The paper derives an effective equation of state by recasting the nonminimal coupling term and assumes a tracking solution whose validity conditions are stated but not re-verified at the specific parameter values that survive the joint DESI+LLR fit. This introduces partial circularity because the claimed dynamical dark energy behavior is built into the model's definition and the data selection already encodes a preference for evolving dark energy, yet the central claim of consistency across datasets still rests on independent LLR bounds and explicit (if not fully cross-checked) existence conditions for the minimum. No self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem is load-bearing, and the derivation does not reduce to a pure renaming or tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model relies on the existence of a tracking minimum in an effective potential derived from the nonminimal coupling; the scalar field is introduced to capture the modified dynamics rather than postulated as a new fundamental entity. No explicit free parameters are named in the abstract, but the coupling strength and potential parameters are implicitly fitted.

free parameters (1)
  • nonminimal coupling strength and potential parameters
    Parameters that control the effective equation of state and are constrained by fitting to cosmological and lunar data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Existence and stability of the tracking solution minimum for the effective scalar field
    Invoked to justify the cosmological solution and the recasting as evolving dark energy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5560 in / 1367 out tokens · 55662 ms · 2026-05-16T23:25:17.378075+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 36 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Coefficients of effective dark energy equation of state a. First order coefficients First we give the coefficients that are involved in the leading-order approximation of the fractionN wX /DwX 22 with respect toξ: V0,1(m) = 9m(2−3m+m 2), V1,1(m) = 3m(−10 + 9m+m 2), V2,1(m) = 2m(2 + 5m), V3,1(m) = 2(2m−1), W0,0(m) = 0, W1,0(m) = 0, W2,0(m) =m, W3,0(m) =−m....

    work page

  2. [2]

    Coefficients of effective dark energy density The coefficients of the numerator are the following: Y (N) 0,0 (m) = 0, Y (N) 1,0 (m) = 4m 2, Y (N) 2,0 (m) =−4m 2, Y (N) 0,1 (m) = 48m 2(m−1), Y (N) 1,1 (m) = 2m(2m 2 + 17m−1), Y (N) 2,1 (m) =−2m(2m 2 −3m+ 3), Y (N) 0,2 (m) = 48m(m−1)(2m−1), Y (N) 1,2 (m) =m(2m−1)(39−6m), Y (N) 2,2 (m) =m(2m−1)(2m−3), Y (N) 0...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Agrawal, F.-Y

    P. Agrawal, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, D. Pinner, and L. Ran- dall, Rock ‘n’ roll solutions to the Hubble tension, Phys. Dark Univ.42, 101347 (2023), arXiv:1904.01016 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, and J. Silk, In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 153001 (2021), arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), DESI 2024 VI: cosmologi- cal constraints from the measurements of baryon acous- tic oscillations, JCAP02, 021, arXiv:2404.03002 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), DESI DR2 Results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cos- mological constraints, Phys. Rev. D112, 083515 (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Zlatev, L.-M

    I. Zlatev, L.-M. Wang, and P. J. Steinhardt, Quintessence, cosmic coincidence, and the cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 896 (1999), arXiv:astro- ph/9807002

    work page arXiv 1999

  8. [8]

    A. Y. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella, and V. Pasquier, An Alternative to quintessence, Phys. Lett. B511, 265 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  9. [9]

    W. J. Wolf, C. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, D. J. Bartlett, and P. G. Ferreira, Scant evidence for thawing quintessence, Phys. Rev. D110, 083528 (2024), arXiv:2408.17318 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Bilic, G

    N. Bilic, G. B. Tupper, and R. D. Viollier, Unification of dark matter and dark energy: The Inhomogeneous Chaplygin gas, Phys. Lett. B535, 17 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0111325. 23

    work page arXiv 2002

  11. [11]

    Can the Chaplygin gas be a plausible model for dark energy?

    V. Gorini, A. Kamenshchik, and U. Moschella, Can the Chaplygin gas be a plausible model for dark energy?, Phys. Rev. D67, 063509 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0209395

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  12. [12]

    M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami, and A. A. Sen, General- ized Chaplygin gas, accelerated expansion and dark en- ergy matter unification, Phys. Rev. D66, 043507 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0202064

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  13. [13]

    Li, P.-J

    T.-N. Li, P.-J. Wu, G.-H. Du, S.-J. Jin, H.-L. Li, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Constraints on Interacting Dark Energy Models from the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscil- lation and DES Supernovae Data, Astrophys. J.976, 1 (2024), arXiv:2407.14934 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Giar` e, M

    W. Giar` e, M. A. Sabogal, R. C. Nunes, and E. Di Valentino, Interacting Dark Energy after DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 251003 (2024), arXiv:2404.15232 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, f(R) Theories Of Gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 451 (2010), arXiv:0805.1726 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    f(R) theories

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, f(R) theories, Living Rev. Rel.13, 3 (2010), arXiv:1002.4928 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  17. [17]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Disappearing cosmological constant in f(R) gravity, JETP Lett.86, 157 (2007), arXiv:0706.2041 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  18. [18]

    Models of f(R) Cosmic Acceleration that Evade Solar-System Tests

    W. Hu and I. Sawicki, Models off(r) cosmic acceleration that evade solar-system tests, Phys. Rev. D76, 064004 (2007), arXiv:0705.1158 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    Extra force in $f(R)$ modified theories of gravity

    O. Bertolami, C. G. B¨ ohmer, T. Harko, and F. S. N. Lobo, Extra force inf(r) modified theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D75, 104016 (2007), arXiv:0704.1733 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  20. [20]

    Mimicking dark matter through a non-minimal gravitational coupling with matter

    O. Bertolami and J. P´ aramos, Mimicking dark mat- ter through a non-minimal gravitational coupling with matter, JCAP2010(03), 009, arXiv:0906.4757 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Mimicking dark matter in galaxy clusters through a non-minimal gravitational coupling with matter

    O. Bertolami, P. Frazao, and J. Paramos, Mimicking dark matter in galaxy clusters through a non-minimal gravi- tational coupling with matter, Phys. Rev. D86, 044034 (2012), arXiv:1111.3167 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  22. [22]

    Information Flow of quantum states interacting with closed timelike curves

    O. Bertolami, P. Fraz˜ ao, and J. P´ aramos, Accelerated expansion from a nonminimal gravitational coupling to matter, Phys. Rev. D81, 104046 (2010), arXiv:1003.1987 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  23. [23]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Barroso Varela and O

    M. Barroso Varela and O. Bertolami, Hubble tension in a nonminimally coupled curvature-matter gravity model, JCAP06, 025, arXiv:2403.11683 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    Gravitational waves in theories with a non-minimal curvature-matter coupling

    O. Bertolami, C. Gomes, and F. S. N. Lobo, Gravita- tional waves in theories with a non-minimal curvature- matter coupling, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 303 (2018), arXiv:1706.06826 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Barroso Varela and O

    M. Barroso Varela and O. Bertolami, Gravitational wave polarizations in nonminimally coupled gravity, Phys. Rev. D111, 024014 (2025), arXiv:2409.07625 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Cosmological perturbations in theories with non-minimal coupling between curvature and matter

    O. Bertolami, P. Fraz˜ ao, and J. P´ aramos, Cosmolog- ical perturbations in theories with non-minimal cou- pling between curvature and matter, JCAP05, 029, arXiv:1303.3215 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    Barroso Varela and O

    M. Barroso Varela and O. Bertolami, Density pertur- bations in nonminimally coupled gravity: symptoms of Lagrangian density ambiguity, arXiv:2505.10291 [gr-qc] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Inflation in non-minimal matter-curvature coupling theories

    C. Gomes, J. G. Rosa, and O. Bertolami, Inflation in non-minimal matter-curvature coupling theories, JCAP 06, 021, arXiv:1611.02124 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Bertolami, M

    O. Bertolami, M. M. Lima, and F. C. Mena, Primordial magnetic fields in theories of gravity with non-minimal coupling between curvature and matter, Gen. Rel. Grav. 54, 82 (2022), arXiv:2204.06883 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Barroso Varela, O

    M. Barroso Varela, O. Bertolami, and A. Mantziris, Infla- tionary dynamics of non-minimally coupledf(R) matter- curvature theories, arXiv:2509.01532 [gr-qc] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    March, O

    R. March, O. Bertolami, M. Muccino, and S. Dell’Agnello, Equivalence principle violation in nonminimally coupled gravity and constraints from lunar laser ranging, Phys. Rev. D109, 124013 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    March, O

    R. March, O. Bertolami, M. Muccino, C. Gomes, and S. Dell’Agnello, Cassini and extra force constraints to nonminimally coupled gravity, Phys. Rev. D105, 044048 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Barroso Varela and O

    M. Barroso Varela and O. Bertolami, Is cosmological data suggesting a nonminimal coupling between mat- ter and gravity?, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101861 (2025), arXiv:2412.09348 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    On the non-minimal gravitational coupling to matter

    O. Bertolami and J. P´ aramos, On the non-minimal grav- itational coupling to matter, Class. Quantum Grav.25, 245017 (2008), arXiv:0805.1241 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  36. [36]

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, Modified gravity with r–matter couplings and (non-)geodesic motion, Class. Quantum Grav.25, 205002 (2008), arXiv:0805.1249 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  37. [37]

    Nonminimal coupling of perfect fluids to curvature

    O. Bertolami, F. S. N. Lobo, and J. P´ aramos, Nonmini- mal coupling of perfect fluids to curvature, Phys. Rev. D 78, 064036 (2008), arXiv:0806.4434 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [38]

    P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, A.-C. Davis, J. Khoury, and A. Weltman, Detecting dark energy in orbit: The cos- mological chameleon, Phys. Rev. D70, 123518 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0408415 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  39. [39]

    Constraining f(R) Gravity as a Scalar Tensor Theory

    T. Faulkner, M. Tegmark, E. F. Bunn, and Y. Mao, Constrainingf(r) gravity as a scalar-tensor theory, Phys. Rev. D76, 063505 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0612569 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  40. [40]

    Dark energy two decades after: Observables, probes, consistency tests

    D. Huterer and D. L. Shafer, Dark energy two decades after: Observables, probes, consistency tests, Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 016901 (2018), arXiv:1709.01091 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    D. L. Turcotte and G. Schubert,Geodynamics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    work page 2002

  42. [42]

    C. M. Will,Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, revised ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1993)

    work page 1993

  43. [43]

    Chameleon Cosmology

    J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Chameleon cosmology, Phys. Rev. D69, 044026 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0309411 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  44. [44]

    A viability criterion for modified gravity with an extra force

    V. Faraoni, A viability criterion for modified gravity with an extra force, Phys. Rev. D76, 127501 (2007), arXiv:0710.1291 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  45. [45]

    Energy Conditions and Stability in $f(R)$ theories of gravity with non-minimal coupling to matter

    O. Bertolami and M. C. Sequeira, Energy conditions and stability inf(r) theories of gravity with nonmini- mal coupling to matter, Phys. Rev. D79, 104010 (2009), arXiv:0903.4540 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  46. [46]

    Equivalence Principle in Chameleon Models

    L. Kraiselburd, S. J. Landau, M. Salgado, D. Su- darsky, and H. Vucetich, Equivalence principle in chameleon models, Phys. Rev. D97, 104044 (2018), arXiv:1511.06307 [gr-qc]. 24

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    Revisiting chameleon gravity - thin-shells and no-shells with appropriate boundary conditions

    T. Tamaki and S. Tsujikawa, Revisiting chameleon grav- ity: Thin-shell and no-shell fields with appropriate boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. D78, 084028 (2008), arXiv:0808.2284 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [48]

    P. T. Metzger and J. E. Lane, Electric potential due to a system of conducting spheres, The Open Applied Physics Journal2, 32 (2009)

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    Solar system and equivalence principle constraints on f(R) gravity by chameleon approach

    S. Capozziello and S. Tsujikawa, Solar system and equivalence principle constraints onf(r) gravity by chameleon approach, Phys. Rev. D77, 107501 (2008), arXiv:0712.2268 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  50. [50]

    Tests of Chameleon Gravity

    C. Burrage and J. Sakstein, Tests of chameleon grav- ity, Living Rev. Relativ.21, 1 (2018), arXiv:1709.09071 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  51. [51]

    Viswanathan, A

    V. Viswanathan, A. Fienga, O. Minazzoli, L. Bernus, J. Laskar, and M. Gastineau, The new lunar ephemeris inpop17a and its application to fundamental physics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.476, 1877 (2018)

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis, Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models, JCAP05, 057, arXiv:2005.05290 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  53. [53]

    GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples

    A. Lewis, GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples, arXiv:1910.13970 [astro-ph.IM] (2019)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  54. [54]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release

    D. Scolnicet al., The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys. J.938, 113 (2022), arXiv:2112.03863 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Camilleriet al.(DES), The dark energy survey super- nova program: investigating beyond-ΛCDM, Mon

    R. Camilleriet al.(DES), The dark energy survey super- nova program: investigating beyond-ΛCDM, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.533, 2615 (2024), arXiv:2406.05048 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Goliath, R

    M. Goliath, R. Amanullah, P. Astier, A. Goobar, and R. Pain, Supernovae and the nature of the dark en- ergy, Astron. Astrophys.380, 6 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0104009

    work page arXiv 2001

  57. [57]

    A. G. Riesset al., A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s −1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team, Astrophys. J. Lett.934, L7 (2022), arXiv:2112.04510 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Camilleriet al.(DES), The Dark Energy Survey Su- pernova Program: an updated measurement of the Hub- ble constant using the inverse distance ladder, Mon

    R. Camilleriet al.(DES), The Dark Energy Survey Su- pernova Program: an updated measurement of the Hub- ble constant using the inverse distance ladder, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.537, 1818 (2025), arXiv:2406.05049 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Lemos and A

    P. Lemos and A. Lewis, CMB constraints on the early Universe independent of late-time cosmology, Phys. Rev. D107, 103505 (2023), arXiv:2302.12911 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identifi- cation, IEEE Trans

    H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identifi- cation, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control19, 716 (1974)

    work page 1974

  61. [61]

    Schwarz, Estimating the Dimension of a Model, An- nals of Statistics6, 461 (1978)

    G. Schwarz, Estimating the Dimension of a Model, An- nals of Statistics6, 461 (1978)

    work page 1978

  62. [62]

    Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology

    R. Trotta, Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology, Contemp. Phys.49, 71 (2008), arXiv:0803.4089 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  63. [63]

    H. Miao, Y. Gong, X. Chen, Z. Huang, X.-D. Li, and H. Zhan, Forecasting the BAO measurements of the CSST galaxy and AGN spectroscopic surveys, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.531, 3991 (2024), arXiv:2311.16903 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Verdier, A

    A. Verdier, A. Rocher, B. Bandi, J. Richard, B. Roukema, J. Loveday, E. Tempel, M. Bilicki, J.-P. Kneib, and M. Guitton, The 4MOST-Cosmology Red- shift Survey: Target Selection of Bright Galaxies and Luminous Red Galaxies, arXiv:2508.07311 [astro-ph.CO] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Qinet al., J-PAS and PFS surveys in the era of dark energy and neutrino mass measurements, arXiv:2505.04275 [astro-ph.CO] (2025)

    F. Qinet al., J-PAS and PFS surveys in the era of dark energy and neutrino mass measurements, arXiv:2505.04275 [astro-ph.CO] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    J. Pan, D. Huterer, F. Andrade-Oliveira, and C. Avestruz, Compressed baryon acoustic oscilla- tion analysis is robust to modified-gravity models, JCAP 06, 051, arXiv:2312.05177 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Duretet al.(Euclid), Euclid preparation

    V. Duretet al.(Euclid), Euclid preparation. BAO anal- ysis of photometric galaxy clustering in configuration space, arXiv:2503.11621 [astro-ph.CO] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Z. Ding, Y. Yu, and P. Zhang, Fisher forecast for the BAO measurements from the CSST spectroscopic and photometric galaxy clustering, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.527, 3728 (2023), arXiv:2305.00404 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Bassiet al., A way forward for fundamental physics in space, npj Microgravity8, Article number: 49 (2022)

    A. Bassiet al., A way forward for fundamental physics in space, npj Microgravity8, Article number: 49 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [70]

    M. Muccinoet al., MoonLIGHT and MPAc: The Eu- ropean Space Agency’s Next-Generation Lunar Laser Retroreflector for NASA’s CLPS/PRISM1A (CP-11) Mission, Special Edition of Remote Sens.17, 813 (2025)

    work page 2025