Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 289 references

This review argues that the high-momentum tail created by short-range nucleon-nucleon correlations reverses the sign of the kinetic symmetry energy at saturation density, stiffens the kinetic energy of symmetric nuclear matter, and generate

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 13:37 UTC pith:OHH2A77O

load-bearing objection A useful but self-referential review; the central physics claim is externally corroborated, but the quantitative NS applications rest on an extrapolation the authors themselves flag. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2512.23455 v1 pith:OHH2A77O submitted 2025-12-29 nucl-th astro-ph.HEhep-phhep-thnucl-ex

Neutron Star Equation of State with Nucleon Short-Range Correlations: A Concise Review and Open Issues

Bao-Jun Cai , Bao-An Li , Yu-Gang Ma This is my paper
classification nucl-th astro-ph.HEhep-phhep-thnucl-ex PACS 26.60.-c21.65.Cd
keywords short-range correlationshigh-momentum tailnucleon momentum distributionequation of statesymmetry energyneutron starsisospin quartic termdirect Urca
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Short-range correlations between nucleons leave a universal high-momentum tail in the nucleon momentum distribution, and this review argues that the tail reshapes the kinetic part of the dense-matter equation of state in a specific way: it stiffens symmetric nuclear matter, makes the kinetic symmetry energy negative at saturation density, and adds a sizable isospin-quartic term. Because the full equation of state has to stay consistent with empirical saturation properties, the potential part must readjust, softening the symmetry energy above saturation and hardening it below. The paper follows these changes into neutron stars, where they alter proton fractions and direct-Urca cooling thresholds, mass-radius relations, and tidal deformabilities. It also identifies the unconstrained density and isospin dependence of the high-momentum tail above saturation as the central open issue.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the SRC-generated high-momentum tail is not a subleading correction but a structural component of a realistic dense-matter EOS. Within the adopted parametrization, the kinetic energy of symmetric nuclear matter at saturation rises to about 39.77 ± 8.13 MeV, the kinetic symmetry energy becomes negative, −14.28 ± 11.59 MeV (about −12.01 ± 8.23 MeV with relativistic corrections), and the isospin-quartic kinetic term reaches about 7.18 ± 2.52 MeV. This is presented as robust: many-body calculations and phenomenological models that include correlations consistently reduce the kinetic symmetry energy relative to a free Fermi gas. The review then shows that this sh

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the parametrized single-nucleon momentum distribution n_J(k): a depleted Fermi sea up to k_F^J, followed by a universal k^{-4} high-momentum tail extending to φ_J k_F^J, with contact coefficient C_J, cutoff φ_J, and high-momentum fraction x_HMT, each following an isospin structure Y_J = Y_0(1 + τ_3^J Y_1 δ). This distribution replaces the free-Fermi-gas step function in every kinetic integral; the k^4 weighting of the tail is what stiffens symmetric matter, while the isospin dependence of C_J and φ_J is what lowers the kinetic symmetry energy and creates the quartic term. The Migdal–Luttinger jump (the discontinuity of the momentum distribution at the Fermi surface

Load-bearing premise

The parameters describing the high-momentum tail — its contact strength, cutoff, and isospin dependence — have only been constrained at densities near or below saturation (ρ ≲ ρ0), yet the review applies them to neutron-star interiors up to about 5ρ0; if the density or isospin dependence of the tail changes above saturation, the claimed symmetry-energy softening and the resulting neutron-star predictions would not hold.

What would settle it

A measurement or ab initio calculation of the high-momentum fraction x_HMT(ρ,δ) at densities between about 2ρ0 and 5ρ0 — for instance from neutron-rich heavy-ion collisions or from many-body calculations of pure neutron matter — that shows the k^{-4} tail disappearing, or its isospin dependence reversing, would falsify the extrapolation on which the paper's neutron-star predictions rest.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Neutron-star EOSs that start from a free Fermi gas omit a structural kinetic correction; with SRC-HMT the kinetic symmetry energy is negative at saturation, forcing the potential symmetry energy to compensate.
  • In β-equilibrium matter the SRC-HMT lowers the proton fraction at supra-saturation densities; in the empirical HMT parameter set the proton fraction stays below the direct-Urca threshold, which would suppress the fastest neutrino-cooling channel.
  • The stiffened symmetric-matter EOS can increase the maximum neutron-star mass — about 8% in one nonlinear mean-field model used here (1.87 vs 1.74 solar masses) — but in Gogny-type or some other relativistic models the effect is reversed, so no universal sign is claimed.
  • Softening of the symmetry energy above saturation enables a flat or even declining Esym around 2–3ρ0, which the paper notes is consistent with a combination of PREX-II, GW170817, NICER, and flow constraints and is tied to a peaked sound-speed profile.
  • Because integrating the TOV equations is largely composition-blind, the same mass-radius and tidal responses could be mimicked by other EOS ingredients; finding observables that uniquely reveal SRC-HMT effects is left as an open problem.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the isospin dependence of the high-momentum tail persists to supra-saturation densities, proton fractions would be systematically reduced; comparing observed surface temperatures of isolated neutron stars with cooling simulations that include this suppression is a direct, testable extension.
  • The negative kinetic symmetry energy is driven by isosinglet neutron-proton pairs and their k^{-4} tail, the same contact physics seen in ultracold Fermi gases; a cross-system test of the contact's density dependence could validate whether the low-density extrapolation holds.
  • The sizable isospin-quartic term implies that the standard parabolic approximation of the asymmetric-matter EOS is unreliable in neutron-rich matter, so observables from neutron-rich heavy-ion collisions or neutron-star radii could be used to isolate quartic-order contributions.
  • Allowing the HMT parameters themselves to vary with density (C_J(ρ), φ_J(ρ)) rather than keeping them fixed would convert the paper's main open question into a quantitative uncertainty band for neutron-star observables.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is a short review of how nucleon short-range correlations (SRCs) and the associated high-momentum tail (HMT) in the single-nucleon momentum distribution n(k) affect the equation of state (EOS) of dense matter and, consequently, neutron-star (NS) properties. The authors introduce a widely used parametrization of n(k) with a universal k^{-4} tail, derive the resulting kinetic EOS of symmetric and asymmetric nuclear matter, and emphasize two qualitative effects: a stiffening of the kinetic EOS of symmetric nuclear matter and a strong reduction of the kinetic symmetry energy, together with a sizable isospin-quartic contribution. They then survey applications to NS mass-radius relations, tidal deformability, proton fraction, direct Urca cooling, and core-crust transition, and conclude with a list of open questions, most notably the poorly constrained density and isospin dependence of HMT parameters above saturation density.

Significance. If the reviewed results are correct, the paper fills a useful niche by consolidating a decade of work on SRC-HMT effects into a concise reference for both nuclear theorists and astrophysicists. Its main strength is the clear presentation of the phenomenological parametrization and its comparison with independent many-body calculations (SCGF, BHF, FHNC, and QMC), which do corroborate the qualitative reduction of the kinetic symmetry energy. The paper also deserves credit for explicitly formulating open issues, including the extrapolation of HMT parameters from densities below saturation to NS core densities. The review is appropriately hedged: it repeatedly notes model dependence in NS predictions. The central limitation is that the quantitative NS applications rely on an assumption—density- and isospin-independent HMT parameters—that the authors themselves identify as unverified; this should not prevent publication but should be flagged more prominently in the presentation of the NS figures.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section A, Eq. (4)] The normalization and integration measure in Eq. (4) are dimensionally inconsistent. The stated normalization "2/(2π)^3 ∫ n_J dk = ρ_J" is missing the 4π k² phase-space factor if dk is a radial integral, and the kinetic-energy integrand k² n_J(k)/(2M_N) would not reproduce Eq. (1), which correctly has k⁴ n(k). The correct form should be either 2/(2π)^3 ∫ n_J(k)d³k = ρ_J with d³k = 4π k² dk, or equivalently (1/π²) ∫ n_J(k)k² dk = ρ_J. As written, the equation cannot be used to derive the quoted results in Eqs. (5)–(6). The same measure error propagates into Eqs. (7) and (8). Please correct the notation so that the review is self-consistent.
  2. [Section C, Eq. (22)] Equation (22), x_p ≈ (1/2)[3 + (k_F/(4E_sym))^3], is incorrect as written: it yields x_p > 1 for all densities and, in the low-density limit where k_F/(4E_sym) ∝ ρ^{-1/3}, it gives x_p ∝ ρ^{-1}, directly contradicting the text's claim that x_p ∝ ρ in this limit. This is likely a typographical error, but it appears in a central discussion of the proton fraction and the direct Urca threshold. Please replace it with the correct approximate expression and verify the limiting behavior, or remove it if it is not used in the subsequent analysis.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section B, Eq. (5)] The statement that Φ0 is "greater than 1" is too strong; for φ0→1⁺, Φ0→0, and only for the adopted value φ0≈2.38 is Φ0>1. It should say "positive for φ0>1".
  2. [Section A, Eq. (2) and Section B, Eq. (10)] The symbol C1 is used with two different meanings: in Eq. (2) it is the isospin-dependence coefficient in C_J = C0(1 + τ3^J C1 δ), while in Eq. (10) it denotes the HMT strength. This is confusing; please use distinct symbols (e.g., η for the HMT strength in Eq. (10)).
  3. [Section C, Figs. 8–11] Because the HMT parameters are known only for ρ≲ρ0, the quantitative NS results (e.g., the M_max values 1.74 vs. 1.87 M⊙ and the proton-fraction curves) should each carry an explicit note that they represent extrapolations. Open issue (1) already discusses this, but a short caveat at the figure or in the adjacent text would prevent readers from misinterpreting these as direct empirical predictions.
  4. [General] There are several typographical artifacts in the text (e.g., the garbled equation in the text following Eq. (22), and the /s… sequences in figure captions). The manuscript should be carefully proofread before resubmission.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction: the SRC-HMT kinetic-EOS results are algebraic consequences of an empirically anchored parametrization and are independently corroborated by SCGF/BHF/FHNC calculations; the main high-density extrapolation is explicitly flagged as an open issue.

full rationale

This is a review article, and its quantitative statements are inherited from prior papers rather than presented as new first-principles derivations. Eq. (2) is an input parametrization of n_J^k, and Eqs. (5)-(6) are direct algebraic consequences of substituting it into Eq. (4); therefore they do not reduce to their inputs by construction in any circular sense. The parameters C0,C1,phi0,phi1 are stated to be 'constrained by microscopic many-body calculations as well as analyses of electron- and proton-nucleus scattering experiments,' i.e., they are fitted to external data rather than to the target result. The central claim--that the kinetic symmetry energy is strongly reduced--is checked against independent many-body frameworks: 'The SRC-induced reduction of the kinetic symmetry energy relative to the FFG prediction is a robust feature observed across many-body theories... SCGF... BHF... FHNC... phenomenological parametrizations [114], consistently show that SRC reduces the kinetic symmetry energy.' This external corroboration breaks any self-citation loop. Frequent citations to Refs. [100,101,167,184] (same authors) are present, but the cited results are externally falsifiable and the review does not invoke a uniqueness theorem or an unverified ansatz chain; the citations are therefore not load-bearing circularity. The weakest point, the extrapolation of rho<=rho0 constraints to ~5rho0, is candidly identified in open issue (1): 'Up to now, all information about the nucleon SRC-induced HMT is constrained only at densities rho <~ rho0... these constraints are implicitly extrapolated to much higher densities.' That is a limitation of the underlying model, not a definitional or self-citational circularity in the review's derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rely on the HMT parametrization of n(k), whose coefficients are fit to scattering data and many-body calculations at saturation density. The extrapolation of these coefficients to supra-saturation densities is an acknowledged open issue.

free parameters (7)
  • C0 (contact coefficient for SNM) = 0.161
    Fitted to electron/proton scattering data and many-body calculations; enters Eqs. (5)-(6).
  • C1 (isospin dependence of contact) = -0.25
    Fitted to isospin-dependent HMT fractions; enters Eq. (6).
  • φ0 (HMT cutoff for SNM) = 2.38
    Fitted to reproduce the high-momentum fraction; enters Eqs. (5)-(6).
  • φ1 (isospin dependence of cutoff) = -0.56
    Fitted to isospin-dependent HMT fractions; enters Eq. (6).
  • x_HMT_SNM (high-momentum fraction in symmetric matter) = 0.28 ± 0.04
    Inferred from a2(1) ≈ 7±1 and deuteron D-state probability; used to calibrate C0.
  • x_HMT_PNM (high-momentum fraction in pure neutron matter) = 0.015 ± 0.05
    Inferred by isospin symmetry from pn dominance; used to set isospin dependence.
  • c0 ≈ a2(1) in Ref. [114] model = ≈7±1
    Used in Eq. (12) for kinetic symmetry energy; taken from nuclear-matter extrapolation.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Universal k^-4 high-momentum tail in the nucleon momentum distribution (Tan-contact scaling)
    Supported by experiments and many-body theory, but assumed to hold also in dense matter; basis of Eq. (1).
  • domain assumption Parametrization Eq. (2): depletion Δ_J below k_F and C_J(k_F/|k|)^4 tail up to φ_J k_F
    Phenomenological form taken from Refs. [100,101]; all subsequent formulas depend on this shape.
  • domain assumption HMT parameters constrained at ρ≲ρ0 be extrapolated to supra-saturation densities
    Acknowledged open issue in Section C; necessary for NS applications.
  • standard math Migdal–Luttinger theorem relates Fermi-surface discontinuity to effective mass
    Used to connect Z_F to effective mass; standard many-body result.
  • domain assumption Parabolic/quartic-truncated expansion of ANM EOS in δ
    Standard approximation in nuclear EOS; used throughout.
  • standard math Beta-equilibrium and TOV equations for NS structure
    Standard astrophysical framework; used for M-R and tidal predictions.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 34880 in / 10132 out tokens · 87466 ms · 2026-08-03T13:37:56.880551+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Nucleon short-range correlations (SRCs) and the associated high-momentum tail (HMT) in its momentum distribution $n(k)$ represent a universal feature of strongly interacting Fermi systems. In nuclear matter, SRCs arise primarily from the spin-isospin dependence of the tensor and short-range components of the nucleon-nucleon interaction, leading to a substantial depletion of its Fermi sea and a characteristic $k^{-4}$ tail populated predominantly by isosinglet neutron-proton pairs. These microscopic structures modify both the kinetic and interaction contributions to the Equation of State (EOS) of dense matter and thereby influence a broad range of neutron-star (NS) properties. This short review provides a streamlined overview of how SRC-induced changes in $n(k)$ reshape the kinetic EOS, including its symmetry energy part and how these effects propagate into macroscopic NS observables, including mass-radius relations, tidal deformabilities, direct Urca thresholds and core-crust transition. We summarize key existing results, highlight current observational constraints relevant for testing SRC-HMT effects, and outline open questions for future theoretical, experimental, and multimessenger studies of dense nucleonic matter.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

289 extracted references · 11 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A theory of highly condensed matter

    J.D Walecka. A theory of highly condensed matter. Annals of Physics, 83(2):491–529, 1974

    1974

  2. [2]

    J. C. Collins and M. J. Perry. Superdense matter: Neutrons or asymptotically free quarks? Phys. Rev. Lett., 34:1353–1356, May 1975

    1975

  3. [3]

    S.A. Chin. A relativistic many-body theory of high density matter. Annals of Physics, 108(2):301–367, 1977

    1977

  4. [4]

    Freedman and Larry D

    Barry A. Freedman and Larry D. McLerran. Fermions and gauge vector mesons at finite temperature and density. i. formal techniques. Phys. Rev. D, 16:1130–1146, Aug 1977

    1977

  5. [5]

    Freedman and Larry D

    Barry A. Freedman and Larry D. McLerran. Fermions and gauge vector mesons at finite temperature and density. ii. the ground-state energy of a relativistic electron gas. Phys. Rev. D, 16:1147–1168, Aug 1977

    1977

  6. [6]

    Freedman and Larry D

    Barry A. Freedman and Larry D. McLerran. Fermions and gauge vector mesons at finite temperature and density. iii. the ground-state energy of a relativistic quark gas. Phys. Rev. D, 16:1169–1185, Aug 1977

    1977

  7. [7]

    Non-abelian gauge theories of fermi systems: Quantum-chromodynamic theory of highly condensed matter

    Varouzhan Baluni. Non-abelian gauge theories of fermi systems: Quantum-chromodynamic theory of highly condensed matter. Phys. Rev. D , 17:2092–2121, Apr 1978

    2092

  8. [8]

    R. B. Wiringa, V . Fiks, and A. Fabrocini. Equation of state for dense nucleon matter. Phys. Rev. C, 38:1010–1037, Aug 1988

    1988

  9. [9]

    Akmal, V

    A. Akmal, V . R. Pandharipande, and D. G. Ravenhall. Equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure. Phys. Rev. C, 58:1804–1828, Sep 1998

    1998

  10. [10]

    A. B. Migdal. Pion fields in nuclear matter. Rev. Mod. Phys., 50:107–172, Jan 1978

    1978

  11. [11]

    Edward V . Shuryak. Quantum chromodynamics and the theory of superdense matter. Physics Reports, 61(2):71–158, 1980

    1980

  12. [12]

    Bailin and A

    D. Bailin and A. Love. Superfluidity and superconductivity in relativistic fermion systems. Physics Reports, 107(6):325–385, 1984

    1984

  13. [13]

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash. Neutron star structure and the equation of state. The Astrophysical Journal, 550(1):426, mar 2001

    2001

  14. [14]

    Pawe Danielewicz, Roy Lacey, and William G. Lynch. Determination of the equation of state of dense matter. Science, 298(5598):15921596, Novem- ber 2002

    2002

  15. [15]

    Steiner, M

    A.W . Steiner, M. Prakash, J.M. Lattimer, and P .J. Ellis. Isospin asymmetry in nuclei and neutron stars.Physics Reports, 411(6):325–375, 2005

    2005

  16. [16]

    Recent progress and new challenges in isospin physics with heavy-ion reactions

    Bao-An Li, Lie-Wen Chen, and Che Ming Ko. Recent progress and new challenges in isospin physics with heavy-ion reactions. Physics Reports, 464(4):113–281, 2008

    2008

  17. [17]

    Alford, Andreas Schmitt, Krishna Rajagopal, and Thomas Schäfer

    Mark G. Alford, Andreas Schmitt, Krishna Rajagopal, and Thomas Schäfer. Color superconductivity in dense quark matter.Rev. Mod. Phys., 80:1455– 1515, Nov 2008

    2008

  18. [18]

    Watts, Nils Andersson, Deepto Chakrabarty, Marco Feroci, Kai Hebeler, Gianluca Israel, Frederick K

    Anna L. Watts, Nils Andersson, Deepto Chakrabarty, Marco Feroci, Kai Hebeler, Gianluca Israel, Frederick K. Lamb, M. Coleman Miller, Sharon Morsink, Feryal Özel, Alessandro Patruno, Juri Poutanen, Dimitrios Psaltis, Achim Schwenk, Andrew W . Steiner, Luigi Stella, Laura T olos, and Michiel van der Klis. Colloquium: Measuring the neutron star equation of s...

    2016

  19. [19]

    Masses, Radii, and the Equation of State of Neutron Stars

    Feryal Özel and Paulo Freire. Masses, Radii, and the Equation of State of Neutron Stars. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 54:401–440, September 2016

    2016

  20. [20]

    Oertel, M

    M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T . Klähn, and S. Typel. Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars. Rev. Mod. Phys., 89:015007, Mar 2017

    2017

  21. [21]

    Hyperons: the strange ingredients of the nuclear equation of state

    Isaac Vidaña. Hyperons: the strange ingredients of the nuclear equation of state. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A , 474(2217):20180145, September 2018

    2018

  22. [22]

    Burgio, H.-J

    G.F . Burgio, H.-J. Schulze, I. Vidaña, and J.-B. Wei. Neutron stars and the nuclear equation of state. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , 120:103879, 2021

    2021

  23. [23]

    Drischler, J.W

    C. Drischler, J.W . Holt, and C. Wellenhofer. Chiral effective field theory and the high-density nuclear equation of state. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 71(1):403432, September 2021

    2021

  24. [24]

    Dense nuclear matter equation of state from heavy-ion collisions

    Sorensen Agnieszka et al. Dense nuclear matter equation of state from heavy-ion collisions. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , 134:104080, 2024

    2024

  25. [25]

    Theoretical and experimental constraints for the equation of state of dense and hot matter

    Rajesh Kumar et al. Theoretical and experimental constraints for the equation of state of dense and hot matter. Living Reviews in Relativity, 27(1), June 2024

    2024

  26. [26]

    From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review

    Gordon Baym, T etsuo Hatsuda, T oru Kojo, Philip D Powell, Yifan Song, and T atsuyuki T akatsuka. From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics, 81(5):056902, mar 2018

    2018

  27. [27]

    Gravitational waves from neutron star mergers and their relation to the nuclear equation of state

    Luca Baiotti. Gravitational waves from neutron star mergers and their relation to the nuclear equation of state. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 109:103714, 2019

    2019

  28. [28]

    Phase transitions in neutron stars and their links to gravitational waves

    Milva G Orsaria, Germán Malfatti, Mauro Mariani, Ignacio F Ranea-Sandoval, Federico García, William M Spinella, Gustavo A Contrera, Germán Lugones, and Fridolin Weber. Phase transitions in neutron stars and their links to gravitational waves. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 46(7):073002, jun 2019

    2019

  29. [29]

    Krastev, De-Hua Wen, and Nai-Bo Zhang

    Bao-An Li, Plamen G. Krastev, De-Hua Wen, and Nai-Bo Zhang. T owards understanding astrophysical effects of nuclear symmetry energy . The European Physical Journal A, 55(7), July 2019

    2019

  30. [30]

    Future physics perspectives on the equation of state from heavy ion collisions to neutron stars

    V Dexheimer, J Noronha, J Noronha-Hostler, N Yunes, and C Ratti. Future physics perspectives on the equation of state from heavy ion collisions to neutron stars. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 48(7):073001, may 2021

    2021

  31. [31]

    J. M. Lattimer. Neutron Stars and the Nuclear Matter Equation of State. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 71:433–464, 2021. — 17 —

    2021

  32. [32]

    Properties of the qcd matter: review of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collider beam energy scan (rhic bes) program

    Jin-Hui Chen et al. Properties of the qcd matter: review of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collider beam energy scan (rhic bes) program. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 35(12), November 2024

    2024

  33. [33]

    Properties of qcd matter: a review of selected results from alice experiment

    Qi-Ye Shou, Yu-Gang Ma, Song Zhang, Jian-Hui Zhu, Ya-Xian Mao, Hua Pei, Zhong-Bao Yin, Xiao-Ming Zhang, Dai-Cui Zhou, Xin-Ye Peng, Xiao-Zhi Bai, Ze-Bo T ang, Yi-Fei Zhang, and Xiao-Mei Li. Properties of qcd matter: a review of selected results from alice experiment. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 35(12), December 2024

    2024

  34. [34]

    Neutron skin and its effects in heavy-ion collisions

    Meng-Qi Ding, De-Qing Fang, and Yu-Gang Ma. Neutron skin and its effects in heavy-ion collisions. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 35(12):211, December 2024

    2024

  35. [35]

    Shapiro and S

    S. Shapiro and S. T eukolsky .Black Holes, White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars: the Physics of Compact Objects . Wiley-VCH, 1983

    1983

  36. [36]

    Haensel, A

    P . Haensel, A. Y. Potekhin, and D. G. Yakovlev.Neutron stars 1: Equation of state and structure , volume 326. Springer, New York, USA, 2007

    2007

  37. [37]

    Novel scalings of neutron star properties from analyzing dimensionless tolmanoppenheimervolkoff equations

    Bao-Jun Cai and Bao-An Li. Novel scalings of neutron star properties from analyzing dimensionless tolmanoppenheimervolkoff equations. The European Physical Journal A, 61(3), March 2025

    2025

  38. [38]

    Brambilla et al

    N. Brambilla et al. QCD and Strongly Coupled Gauge Theories: Challenges and Perspectives. Eur . Phys. J. C, 74(10):2981, 2014

    2014

  39. [39]

    Pitaevskii, and Sandro Stringari

    Stefano Giorgini, Lev P . Pitaevskii, and Sandro Stringari. Theory of ultracold atomic fermi gases. Rev. Mod. Phys., 80:1215–1274, Oct 2008

    2008

  40. [40]

    Many-body physics with ultracold gases

    Immanuel Bloch, Jean Dalibard, and Wilhelm Zwerger. Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys., 80:885–964, Jul 2008

    2008

  41. [41]

    O. Hen, G. A. Miller, E. Piasetzky, and L. B. Weinstein. Nucleon-Nucleon Correlations, Short-lived Excitations, and the Quarks Within. Rev. Mod. Phys., 89(4):045002, 2017

    2017

  42. [42]

    H. A. Bethe. Theory of nuclear matter. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 21:93–244, 1971

    1971

  43. [43]

    Energetics of a strongly correlated fermi gas

    Shina T an. Energetics of a strongly correlated fermi gas. Annals of Physics, 323(12):29522970, December 2008

    2008

  44. [44]

    Large momentum part of a strongly correlated fermi gas

    Shina T an. Large momentum part of a strongly correlated fermi gas. Annals of Physics, 323(12):29712986, December 2008

    2008

  45. [45]

    Generalized virial theorem and pressure relation for a strongly correlated Fermi gas

    Shina T an. Generalized virial theorem and pressure relation for a strongly correlated Fermi gas. Annals Phys., 323:2987–2990, 2008

    2008

  46. [46]

    Hen et al

    O. Hen et al. Momentum sharing in imbalanced Fermi systems. Science, 346(6209):614–617, October 2014

    2014

  47. [47]

    Subedi et al

    R. Subedi et al. Probing cold dense nuclear matter. Science, 320(5882):14761478, June 2008

    2008

  48. [48]

    Benhar, V

    O. Benhar, V . R. Pandharipande, and Steven C. Pieper. Electron-scattering studies of correlations in nuclei. Rev. Mod. Phys., 65:817–828, Jul 1993

    1993

  49. [49]

    E. I. Piasetzky and L. B. Weinstein. Measurements of NN Correlations in Nuclei, pages 2385–2406. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023

    2023

  50. [50]

    Weise.Pions and Nuclei

    T orleif Erik Oskar Ericson and W . Weise.Pions and Nuclei. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1988

    1988

  51. [51]

    G. E. Brown and Mannque Rho. In-medium stiffening of the nucleon nucleon spin - isospin interaction. Phys. Lett. B, 237:3–7, 1990

    1990

  52. [52]

    Electromagnetic Response of Atomic Nuclei, volume 20 of Oxford Studies in Nuclear Physics

    Sigfrido Boffi, Carlotta Giusti, Franco davide Pacati, and Marco Radici. Electromagnetic Response of Atomic Nuclei, volume 20 of Oxford Studies in Nuclear Physics. Clarendon Press, Oxford UK, 1996

    1996

  53. [53]

    J. J. Aubert et al. The ratio of the nucleon structure functions F 2n for iron and deuterium. Phys. Lett. B, 123:275–278, 1983

    1983

  54. [54]

    L. B. Weinstein, E. Piasetzky, D. W . Higinbotham, J. Gomez, O. Hen, and R. Shneor. Short Range Correlations and the EMC Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:052301, 2011

    2011

  55. [55]

    Schmookler et al

    B. Schmookler et al. Modified structure of protons and neutrons in correlated pairs. Nature, 566(7744):354–358, 2019

    2019

  56. [56]

    Effects of the kinetic symmetry energy reduced by short-range correlations in heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energies

    Bao-An Li, Wen-Jun Guo, and Zhaozhong Shi. Effects of the kinetic symmetry energy reduced by short-range correlations in heavy-ion collisions at intermediate energies. Phys. Rev. C, 91:044601, Apr 2015

    2015

  57. [57]

    Bombaci and U

    I. Bombaci and U. Lombardo. Asymmetric nuclear matter equation of state. Phys. Rev. C, 44:1892–1900, Nov 1991

    1900

  58. [58]

    Nuclear matter fourth-order symmetry energy in the relativistic mean field models

    Bao-Jun Cai and Lie-Wen Chen. Nuclear matter fourth-order symmetry energy in the relativistic mean field models. Phys. Rev. C, 85:024302, Feb 2012

    2012

  59. [59]

    W . M. Seif and D. N. Basu. Higher-order symmetry energy of nuclear matter and the inner edge of neutron star crusts. Phys. Rev. C, 89:028801, Feb 2014

    2014

  60. [60]

    Gonzalez-Boquera, M

    C. Gonzalez-Boquera, M. Centelles, X. Viñas, and A. Rios. Higher-order symmetry energy and neutron star core-crust transition with gogny forces. Phys. Rev. C, 96:065806, Dec 2017

    2017

  61. [61]

    Nuclear matter fourth-order symmetry energy in nonrelativistic mean-field models.Phys

    Jie Pu, Zhen Zhang, and Lie-Wen Chen. Nuclear matter fourth-order symmetry energy in nonrelativistic mean-field models.Phys. Rev. C, 96:054311, Nov 2017

    2017

  62. [62]

    Nucleon effective masses in neutron-rich matter

    Bao-An Li, Bao-Jun Cai, Lie-Wen Chen, and Jun Xu. Nucleon effective masses in neutron-rich matter. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , 99:29119, March 2018

    2018

  63. [63]

    D. Ding, A. Rios, H. Dussan, W . H. Dickhoff, S. J. Witte, A. Carbone, and A. Polls. Pairing in high-density neutron matter including short- and long-range correlations. Phys. Rev. C, 94:025802, Aug 2016

    2016

  64. [64]

    B. P . Abbott et al. Gw170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:161101, Oct 2017

    2017

  65. [65]

    B. P . Abbott et al. Gw170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:161101, Oct 2018

    2018

  66. [66]

    Abbott et al

    B.P . Abbott et al. Gw190425: Observation of a compact binary coalescence with total mass 3.4m . The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 892(1):L3, mar 2020

    2020

  67. [67]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. Gw190814: Gravitational waves from the coalescence of a 23 solar mass black hole with a 2.6 solar mass compact object. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 896(2):L44, jun 2020

    2020

  68. [68]

    Riley Thomas et al

    E. Riley Thomas et al. A nicer view of the massive pulsar psr j0740+6620 informed by radio timing and xmm-newton spectroscopy .The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 918(2):L27, sep 2021

    2021

  69. [69]

    T . E. Riley et al. A nicer view of psr j0030+0451: Millisecond pulsar parameter estimation. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 887(1):L21, dec 2019

    2019

  70. [70]

    A nicer view of the nearest and brightest millisecond pulsar: Psr j04374715

    Devarshi Choudhury et al. A nicer view of the nearest and brightest millisecond pulsar: Psr j04374715. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 971(1):L20, August 2024

    2024

  71. [71]

    Watts, Melissa Mendes, Nathan Rutherford, Achim Schwenk, Isak Svensson, Slavko Bogdanov, Matthew Kerr, Paul S

    Lucien Mauviard, Sebastien Guillot, Tuomo Salmi, Devarshi Choudhury, Bas Dorsman, Denis González-Caniulef, Mariska Hoogkamer, Daniela Huppenkothen, Christine Kazantsev, Yves Kini, Jean-Francois Olive, Pierre Stammler, Anna L. Watts, Melissa Mendes, Nathan Rutherford, Achim Schwenk, Isak Svensson, Slavko Bogdanov, Matthew Kerr, Paul S. Ray, Lucas Guillemot...

    arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Sullivan and Roger W

    Andrew G. Sullivan and Roger W . Romani. The intrabinary shock and companion star of redback pulsar j2215 +5135. The Astrophysical Journal , 974(2):315, October 2024

    2024

  73. [73]

    Romani, D

    Roger W . Romani, D. Kandel, Alexei V . Filippenko, Thomas G. Brink, and WeiKang Zheng. Psr j09520607: The fastest and heaviest known galactic neutron star. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 934(2):L17, July 2022

    2022

  74. [74]

    P . B. Demorest, T . Pennucci, S. M. Ransom, M. S. E. Roberts, and J. W . T . Hessels. A two-solar-mass neutron star measured using shapiro delay. Nature, 467(7319):10811083, October 2010. — 18 —

    2010

  75. [75]

    The nanograv 11-year data set: High-precision timing of 45 millisecond pulsars

    Zaven Arzoumanian et al. The nanograv 11-year data set: High-precision timing of 45 millisecond pulsars. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 235(2):37, April 2018

    2018

  76. [76]

    A massive pulsar in a compact relativistic binary

    John Antoniadis et al. A massive pulsar in a compact relativistic binary. Science, 340(6131), April 2013

    2013

  77. [77]

    Fonseca et al

    E. Fonseca et al. Refined mass and geometric measurements of the high-mass psr j0740 +6620. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , 915(1):L12, jul 2021

    2021

  78. [78]

    M. C. Miller et al. The radius of psr j0740 +6620 from nicer and xmm-newton data. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 918(2):L28, sep 2021

    2021

  79. [79]

    The radius of psr j0740 +6620 from nicer with nicer background estimates

    Tuomo Salmi et al. The radius of psr j0740 +6620 from nicer with nicer background estimates. The Astrophysical Journal, 941(2):150, dec 2022

    2022

  80. [80]

    The radius of the high mass pulsar psr j0740 +6620 with 3.6 years of nicer data

    Tuomo Salmi et al. The radius of the high mass pulsar psr j0740 +6620 with 3.6 years of nicer data. Astrophysical J., 2024

    2024

Showing first 80 references.