pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.10183 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Classification and design of two-dimensional altermagnets

Sike Zeng , Dong Liu , Hongjie Peng , Chang-Chun He , Xiao-Bao Yang , Yu-Jun Zhao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 14:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetstwo-dimensional materialsspin splittingcollinear antiferromagnetsspin-group theoryspintronicsmaterial designsymmetry classification
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Spin-group theory classifies two-dimensional altermagnets and flags materials with large spin splitting.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews the symmetry classification of two-dimensional altermagnets using spin-group theory to identify collinear antiferromagnets that carry zero net moment yet support non-relativistic spin-polarized bands. It surveys a growing list of candidate materials chosen for sizable spin splitting and discusses concrete engineering routes such as strain, heterostructuring, and doping. A sympathetic reader cares because the two-dimensional limit adds structural tunability while preserving the spintronic advantages of altermagnetism over conventional ferromagnets or antiferromagnets. The work consolidates theoretical proposals to guide experimental efforts toward realizable platforms.

Core claim

Altermagnets in two dimensions are collinear antiferromagnets that exhibit symmetry-protected spin splitting without net magnetization or relativistic mechanisms. Spin-group theory supplies the classification that distinguishes allowed symmetry classes and predicts the momentum-dependent spin polarization in the electronic bands. The review compiles candidate materials with large predicted splittings and outlines design strategies including lattice engineering and interface control to realize these properties in atomically thin crystals.

What carries the argument

Spin-group theory, which augments conventional magnetic point groups with spin rotations to determine the symmetry-allowed patterns of spin splitting in collinear antiferromagnetic order.

If this is right

  • Prioritized candidates become targets for thin-film growth and transport experiments.
  • Engineering methods allow systematic tuning of the spin-splitting magnitude and direction.
  • Two-dimensional altermagnets can be stacked into van der Waals heterostructures without introducing stray magnetic fields.
  • The symmetry classification supplies a systematic search criterion for additional material families.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Integration with other two-dimensional phenomena such as ferroelectricity or superconductivity could produce multifunctional devices.
  • The absence of net moment may simplify scaling to nanoscale spintronic circuits compared with ferromagnets.
  • Room-temperature operation hinges on verifying that the predicted splittings survive thermal fluctuations in real samples.

Load-bearing premise

That the listed candidate materials will retain the predicted altermagnetic band structure once fabricated, without strong electron correlations or relativistic corrections washing out the non-relativistic spin splitting.

What would settle it

Fabrication and angle-resolved photoemission measurement of a top candidate showing either finite net magnetization or zero spin splitting across the Brillouin zone would falsify the classification for that material.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.10183 by Chang-Chun He, Dong Liu, Hongjie Peng, Sike Zeng, Xiao-Bao Yang, Yu-Jun Zhao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the crystal structures and nonrelativistic band structures of three types of two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic illustration of the design routes for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematics of how different spin and spatial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The band structure of altermagnets exhibiting large spin splitting in the absence of spin-orbit coupling: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The crystal structure and band structure without spin-orbit coupling (SOC) of bilayer altermagnets. (a)-(c) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Schematic diagram of sliding-ferroelectricity-controlled spin-splitting switching, including configurations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) The crystal structure of CrSiS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Structural configuration and corresponding band structure of a monolayer VPS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) The crystal structure of CaMnSi[90]. (b) The spin-resolved band structure under opposite out-of-plane electric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Altermagnets -- newly identified collinear antiferromagnets -- carry zero net moment with non-relativistic, spin-polarized bands, distilling the best of ferromagnets and antiferromagnets into a single spintronic platform. Shrunking to the two-dimensional limit, they inherit the tunability of two-dimensional crystals while adding symmetry-protected spin splitting, a combination now driving intense experimental interest. Here, we review the symmetry classification of two-dimensional altermagnets based on spin-group theory and survey the growing list of candidate materials, emphasizing those with large spin splitting for experimental realization. We then examine strategies for engineering two-dimensional altermagnetism. This Review aims to consolidate theoretically proposed candidate materials and realization strategies for two-dimensional altermagnets, providing insights for future experimental efforts in this emerging field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reviews the symmetry classification of two-dimensional altermagnets using spin-group theory, surveys a list of candidate materials (emphasizing those with large spin splitting), and discusses engineering strategies for realizing 2D altermagnetism, with the goal of consolidating theoretical proposals to guide experimental efforts.

Significance. If the spin-group classification remains valid for real materials, the review consolidates symmetry-allowed spin splittings and material candidates in a rapidly emerging area, providing a useful reference for spintronic platforms that combine zero net magnetization with non-relativistic spin polarization and 2D tunability.

major comments (1)
  1. [§2–3] §2–3: The derivation of allowed spin splittings from spin-group operations assumes the non-relativistic limit, but the manuscript provides no SOC strength estimates or Hubbard U values for any entry in Table 1 (e.g., Cr2Se2 or FeSe monolayers). In 2D, substrate-enhanced SOC can reach tens of meV and may mix the spin channels or close the reported splittings, weakening the central premise that the splitting is symmetry-protected and non-relativistic.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'Shrunking' is a typographical error and should read 'Shrinking'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the constructive comment on the non-relativistic approximation. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2–3] §2–3: The derivation of allowed spin splittings from spin-group operations assumes the non-relativistic limit, but the manuscript provides no SOC strength estimates or Hubbard U values for any entry in Table 1 (e.g., Cr2Se2 or FeSe monolayers). In 2D, substrate-enhanced SOC can reach tens of meV and may mix the spin channels or close the reported splittings, weakening the central premise that the splitting is symmetry-protected and non-relativistic.

    Authors: We agree that the spin-group classification in §§2–3 is formulated in the non-relativistic limit, as is standard for altermagnetism to isolate symmetry-protected spin splitting. The original manuscript indeed omits explicit SOC estimates and Hubbard U values for Table 1 entries. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) providing literature-based SOC strengths and the Hubbard U parameters employed in the referenced calculations for the key candidates (including Cr2Se2 and FeSe monolayers). We will also discuss the robustness of the reported splittings against moderate SOC, noting that many listed materials exhibit non-relativistic splittings substantially larger than typical 2D SOC values (~10–30 meV), so that the altermagnetic signatures remain observable. This addition will clarify the regime of validity without changing the central symmetry-based premise. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review relies on external spin-group literature and prior calculations

full rationale

The manuscript is a review that applies spin-group theory to classify 2D altermagnets and surveys candidate materials drawn from external literature. No parameters are fitted within the paper, no predictions are generated from the paper's own data or equations, and no derivation reduces by construction to its inputs. Central statements on symmetry-protected spin splitting rest on cited prior calculations rather than self-referential re-derivation. The classification chain is self-contained against external benchmarks, with no load-bearing self-citations that collapse the argument to unverified assumptions internal to this work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on established spin-group theory and prior material calculations; it introduces no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or postulated entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spin-group theory provides a complete and sufficient classification framework for collinear magnetic symmetries in two-dimensional crystals.
    Invoked as the basis for the entire classification section.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5447 in / 1191 out tokens · 28891 ms · 2026-05-16T14:32:29.216072+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    All nontrivial spin Laue groups describing 2D altermagnets are listed in Table I. They are classified into three types, including d-, g-, i-wave, according to the basic characteristic of spin-momentum locking... When the characteristic integer is 2, 4, or 6, the corresponding types... are respectively classified as d-wave, g-wave, and i-wave.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Altermagnetism is a nonrelativistic phenomenon and is therefore governed primarily by spin group symmetries... For two-dimensional magnetic materials, the real-space part of the nontrivial spin group should be a layer group.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

201 extracted references · 201 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Be- yond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferro- magnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Physical Review X 12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Physical Re- view X 12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new fron- tiers in magnetism and spintronics, Advanced Func- tional Materials 34, 2409327 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nature Reviews Materials 10, 473 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    S. S. Fender, O. Gonzalez, and D. K. Bediako, Alter- magnetism: A chemical perspective, Journal of the American Chemical Society 147, 2257 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Tamang, S

    R. Tamang, S. Gurung, D. P. Rai, S. Brahimi, and S. Lounis, Altermagnetism and Altermagnets: A Brief Review, Magnetism 5, 17 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear an- tiferromagnets, Science advances 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S.-C. Zhang, Fermi liquid instabilities in the spin channel, Physical Re- view B 75, 115103 (2007)

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, journal of the physical society of japan 88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low- Z antiferromag- nets, Physical Review B 102, 014422 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, and L.ˇSmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb 2, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2108924118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.- F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromag- netic materials with giant piezomagnetism and non- collinear spin current, Nature Communications 12, 2846 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin- orbit coupling, Physical Review X12, 021016 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 015005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wun- derlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nature nan- otechnology 11, 231 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, 22 B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. ˇSmejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic MnTe, Physical Review Letters 132, 036702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in altermagnetic MnTe, Physical Review B109, 115102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Feng, and D. Shen, Large band splitting in g-wave altermagnet CrSb, Physical Re- view Letters 133, 206401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Zeng, M.-Y

    M. Zeng, M.-Y. Zhu, Y.-P. Zhu, X.-R. Liu, X.- M. Ma, Y.-J. Hao, P. Liu, G. Qu, Y. Yang, Z. Jiang, et al. , Observation of spin splitting in room-temperature metallic antiferromagnet CrSb, Advanced Science 11, 2406529 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, et al. , Direct observa- tion of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nature Communications 15, 2116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao, et al. , Three- dimensional mapping of the altermagnetic spin split- ting in CrSb, Nature Communications 16, 1442 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y.-J. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, A metal- lic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nature Physics 21, 754 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, X. Meng, C. Zhang, T. Okuda, K. Shi- mada, S. Cui, Y. Zhao, G.-H. Cao, S. Qiao, J. Liu, and C. Chen, Crystal-symmetry-paired spin–valley locking in a layered room-temperature metallic alter- magnet candidate, Nature Physics 21, 760 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Yamamoto, L

    R. Yamamoto, L. A. Turnbull, M. Schmidt, J. C. Corsaletti Filho, H. J. Binger, M. Di Pietro Mart´ ınez, M. Weigand, S. Finizio, Y. Prots, G. M. Ferguson, U. Vool, S. Wintz, and C. Donnelly, Altermagnetic nanotextures revealed in bulk MnTe, Physical Review Applied 24, 034037 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling magnetoresistance in unconventional collinear an- tiferromagnets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Physical Review X 12, 011028 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Liao, Y.-C

    C.-T. Liao, Y.-C. Wang, Y.-C. Tien, S.-Y. Huang, and D. Qu, Separation of Inverse Altermagnetic Spin-Splitting Effect from Inverse Spin Hall Effect in RuO2, Physical Review Letters 133, 056701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Q. Cui, B. Zeng, P. Cui, T. Yu, and H. Yang, Efficient spin Seebeck and spin Nernst effects of magnons in altermagnets, Physical Review B 108, L180401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrela- tivistic collinear antiferromagnetism, Physical Re- view Letters 126, 127701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic RuO2, Physical Review Letters 129, 137201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromagnet RuO2, Physical Review Letters 128, 197202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Ma and J.-F

    H.-Y. Ma and J.-F. Jia, Altermagnetic topological insulator and the selection rules, Physical Review B 110, 064426 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Y.-X. Li, Y. Liu, and C.-C. Liu, Creation and ma- nipulation of higher-order topological states by alter- magnets, Physical Review B 109, L201109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Weber, K

    M. Weber, K. Leckron, L. Haag, R. Jaeschke- Ubiergo, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and H. C. Schneider, Ultrafast electron dynamics in altermagnetic mate- rials, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08160 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Tan, Z.-F

    C.-Y. Tan, Z.-F. Gao, H.-C. Yang, Z.-X. Liu, K. Liu, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, Crystal valley Hall effect, Physical Review B 111, 094411 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    S.-D. Guo, Y. Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Valley polar- ization in twisted altermagnetism, Physical Review B 110, L220402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Guo, X.-S

    S.-D. Guo, X.-S. Guo, and G. Wang, Valley polariza- tion in two-dimensional tetragonal altermagnetism, Physical Review B 110, 184408 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Li, Realizing tunable higher-order topological superconductors with altermagnets, Physical Review B 109, 224502 (2024)

    Y.-X. Li, Realizing tunable higher-order topological superconductors with altermagnets, Physical Review B 109, 224502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Altermagnetic su- perconducting diode effect, Physical Review B 110, 024503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Papaj, Andreev reflection at the altermagnet- superconductor interface, Physical Review B 108, L060508 (2023)

    M. Papaj, Andreev reflection at the altermagnet- superconductor interface, Physical Review B 108, L060508 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Brekke, A

    B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, Two- dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a minimal microscopic model, Physical Review B 108, 224421 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Chakraborty and A

    D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Perfect superconducting diode effect in altermagnets, Phys- ical Review Letters 135, 026001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    H. G. Giil and J. Linder, Superconductor- altermagnet memory functionality without stray fields, Physical Review B 109, 134511 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    P. O. Sukhachov, E. W. Hodt, and J. Linder, Thermoelectric effect in altermagnet-superconductor junctions, Physical Review B 110, 094508 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Badura, W

    A. Badura, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, I. Kounta, L. Michez, M. Petit, J. Rial, M. Leivisk¨ a, V. Baltz, F. Krizek, et al., Observation of the anoma- lous nernst effect in altermagnetic candidate Mn5Si3, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12929 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    L. Han, X. Fu, W. He, J. Dai, Y. Zhu, W. Yang, Y. Chen, J. Zhang, W. Zhu, H. Bai, C. Chen, D. Hou, C. Wan, X. Han, C. Song, J. Liu, and F. Pan, Non- volatile anomalous nernst effect in Mn 5Si3 with a collinear N´ eel vector, Physical Review Applied 23, 044066 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    X.-J. Yi, Y. Mao, X. Lu, and Q.-F. Sun, Spin split- ting nernst effect in altermagnets, Physical Review 23 B 111, 035423 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Weißenhofer and A

    M. Weißenhofer and A. Marmodoro, Atomistic spin dynamics simulations of magnonic spin Seebeck and spin Nernst effects in altermagnets, Physical Review B 110, 094427 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Hoyer, R

    R. Hoyer, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, K.-H. Ahn, L. ˇSmejkal, and A. Mook, Spontaneous crystal ther- mal Hall effect in insulating altermagnets, Physical Review B 111, L020412 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, I. ˇZuti´ c, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric altermagnets: Antiferroelectricity alters magnets, Physical Review Letters 134, 106801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    W. Sun, C. Yang, W. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Wang, S. Huang, and Z. Cheng, Proposing altermagnetic- ferroelectric Type-III multiferroics with robust mag- netoelectric coupling, Advanced Materials , 2502575 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetic multiferroics and altermagnetoelectric effect, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19928 (2024)

    L. ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetic multiferroics and altermagnetoelectric effect, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19928 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    M. Gu, Y. Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y. Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switch- able altermagnetism, Physical Review Letters 134, 106802 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang, et al. , Discovery of in- trinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals, Nature 546, 265 (2017)

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, et al., Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature 546, 270 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    Q. H. Wang, A. Bedoya-Pinto, M. Blei, A. H. Dis- mukes, A. Hamo, S. Jenkins, M. Koperski, Y. Liu, Q.-C. Sun, E. J. Telford,et al., The magnetic genome of two-dimensional van der Waals materials, ACS nano 16, 6960 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    K. F. Mak, J. Shan, and D. C. Ralph, Probing and controlling magnetic states in 2D layered magnetic materials, Nature Reviews Physics 1, 646 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Huang, M

    B. Huang, M. A. McGuire, A. F. May, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and X. Xu, Emergent phenom- ena and proximity effects in two-dimensional mag- nets and heterostructures, Nature Materials19, 1276 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Zhang, R

    Z. Zhang, R. Sun, and Z. Wang, Recent advances in two-dimensional ferromagnetic materials-based van der waals heterostructures, ACS nano 19, 187 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Y. Xu, A. Ray, Y.-T. Shao, S. Jiang, K. Lee, D. We- ber, J. E. Goldberger, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. A. Muller, et al. , Coexisting ferromagnetic– antiferromagnetic state in twisted bilayer CrI 3, Na- ture nanotechnology 17, 143 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    H. Xie, X. Luo, G. Ye, Z. Ye, H. Ge, S. H. Sung, E. Rennich, S. Yan, Y. Fu, S. Tian,et al., Twist engi- neering of the two-dimensional magnetism in double bilayer chromium triiodide homostructures, Nature Physics 18, 30 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Y. Qi, J. Zhao, and H. Zeng, Spin-layer coupling in two-dimensional altermagnetic bilayers with tunable spin and valley splitting properties, Physical Review B 110, 014442 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Y. Wu, L. Deng, X. Yin, J. Tong, F. Tian, and X. Zhang, Valley-related multipiezo effect and non- collinear spin current in an altermagnet Fe 2Se2O monolayer, Nano Letters 24, 10534 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Li, Y.-K

    Y.-Q. Li, Y.-K. Zhang, X.-L. Lu, Y.-P. Shao, Z.- Q. Bao, J.-D. Zheng, W.-Y. Tong, and C.-G. Duan, Ferrovalley physics in stacked bilayer altermagnetic systems, Nano Letters 25, 6032 (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [65]

    J.-Y. Zhan, R. He, D. Wang, M.-D. He, N. Luo, J. Zeng, K.-Q. Chen, and L.-M. Tang, Multiphysics field driven valley polarization in tetragonal alter- magnets, Physical Review B 112, 024408 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [66]

    Sheoran and P

    S. Sheoran and P. Dev, Spontaneous anomalous Hall effect in two-dimensional altermagnets, Physical Re- view B 111, 184407 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [67]

    S. Liu, Z. Zhang, L. Bai, and W. Feng, Anomalous transport properties in the two-dimensional topolog- ical altermagnet V 2Te2O, Physical Review B 111, 184437 (2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [68]

    H. Jin, Z. Tan, Z. Gong, and J. Wang, Anomalous Hall effect in two-dimensional vanadium tetrahalo- gen with altermagnetic phase, Physical Review B 110, 155125 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [69]

    Yarmohammadi, U

    M. Yarmohammadi, U. Z¨ ulicke, J. Berakdar, J. Lin- der, and J. K. Freericks, Anisotropic light-tailored RKKY interaction in two-dimensional d-wave alter- magnets, Physical Review B 111, 224412 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [70]

    Z. Zhu, X. Duan, J. Zhang, B. Hao, I. ˇZuti´ c, and T. Zhou, Two-Dimensional Ferroelectric Altermag- nets: From Model to Material Realization, Nano Let- ters 25, 9456 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [71]

    W. Sun, H. Ye, L. Liang, N. Ding, S. Dong, and S.- S. Wang, Stacking-dependent ferroicity of a reversed bilayer: Altermagnetism or ferroelectricity, Physical Review B 110, 224418 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [72]

    W. Sun, W. Wang, C. Yang, R. Hu, S. Yan, S. Huang, and Z. Cheng, Altermagnetism induced by sliding ferroelectricity via lattice symmetry- mediated magnetoelectric coupling, Nano Letters 24, 11179 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [73]

    Y. Zhu, M. Gu, Y. Liu, X. Chen, Y. Li, S. Du, and Q. Liu, Sliding ferroelectric control of unconven- tional magnetism in stacked bilayers, Physical Re- view Letters 135, 056801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  73. [74]

    Wang, W.-W

    S. Wang, W.-W. Wang, J. Fan, X. Zhou, X.-P. Li, and L. Wang, Two-Dimensional Dual-Switchable Ferroelectric Altermagnets: Altering Electrons and Magnons, Nano Letters 25, 14618 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [75]

    Zhu, Z.-Y

    D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Topolog- ical superconductivity in two-dimensional altermag- netic metals, Physical Review B 108, 184505 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [76]

    Wei, Gapless superconducting state and mi- rage gap in altermagnets, Physical Review B 109, L201404 (2024)

    M. Wei, Gapless superconducting state and mi- rage gap in altermagnets, Physical Review B 109, L201404 (2024)

    work page 2024

  76. [77]

    Wei, Unconventional Hall Effect in Gapless Su- perconductors: Transverse Supercurrent Converted from Normal Current, Physical Review Letters 135, 166304 (2025)

    M. Wei, Unconventional Hall Effect in Gapless Su- perconductors: Transverse Supercurrent Converted from Normal Current, Physical Review Letters 135, 166304 (2025)

    work page 2025

  77. [78]

    O. E. Parfenov, D. V. Averyanov, I. S. Sokolov, A. N. Mihalyuk, O. A. Kondratev, A. N. Taldenkov, A. M. Tokmachev, and V. G. Storchak, Pushing an alter- magnet to the ultimate 2D limit: Symmetry break- 24 ing in monolayers of GdAlSi, Journal of the Ameri- can Chemical Society 147, 5911 (2025)

    work page 2025

  78. [79]

    Brinkman and R

    W. Brinkman and R. J. Elliott, Theory of spin-space groups, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 294, 343 (1966)

    work page 1966

  79. [80]

    D. B. Litvin and W. Opechowski, Spin groups, Phys- ica 76, 538 (1974)

    work page 1974

  80. [81]

    D. B. Litvin, Spin point groups, Acta Crystallo- graphica Section A: Crystal Physics, Diffraction, Theoretical and General Crystallography 33, 279 (1977)

    work page 1977

Showing first 80 references.