Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Layer-engineered quantum anomalous Hall states realize Chern number C = N in twisted rhombohedral graphene, with electrical switching between C = 3 and C = 4 in one device.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 09:20 UTC pith:KDL2EGDU

load-bearing objection Solid transport evidence for high-Chern QAH states in twisted rhombohedral graphene, but the C=N rule rests on one device per layer number and needs more devices before it becomes a design law. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2601.14014 v2 pith:KDL2EGDU submitted 2026-01-20 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el

Layer-engineered quantum anomalous Hall effect in twisted rhombohedral graphene

Zhangyuan Chen , Naitian Liu , Jiannan Hua , Hanxiao Xiang , Wenqiang Zhou , Jing Ding , Xinjie Fang , Linfeng Wu
show 8 more authors
Le Zhang Qianmei Chen Xuanyu Chen Kenji Watanabe Takashi Taniguchi Na Xin Wei Zhu Shuigang Xu
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords twisted rhombohedral graphenequantum anomalous Hall effectChern numberlayer engineeringmoiré superlatticedisplacement fieldtopological phase transitionorbital Chern insulator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to show that the Chern number — the integer counting a quantum anomalous Hall insulator's dissipationless edge channels — can be programmed by construction and retuned by voltage. In twisted monolayer-on-rhombohedral-N-layer graphene, denoted (1+N)L, the authors report quantized Hall resistance h/(Ne²) at one electron per moiré cell, meaning C=N for N=3, 4, and 5. In twisted Bernal-bilayer-on-rhombohedral-tetralayer graphene, (2+4)L, a displacement field drives the same device between two distinct QAH states with C=3 and C=4. They also show that near moiré filling ν=3 in the (1+3)L device, the sign of C can be flipped by doping or displacement field. If the layer-engineering rule holds, Chern number becomes a design parameter rather than an accidental material property.

Core claim

The central claim is that the first moiré conduction band in twisted monolayer-rhombohedral N-layer graphene carries a valley Chern number equal to N, realized as a zero-field quantum anomalous Hall state at moiré filling ν=1: quantized Hall resistivity h/(Ne²) and vanishing longitudinal resistivity for N=3,4,5, with the Streda formula independently giving C=N. In a (2+4)L stack, one device hosts C=3 at one displacement field and C=4 at another, so the absolute Chern number is electrically switchable in situ. Near ν≈3 in (1+3)L, the sign of C reverses with doping, displacement field, or magnetic-field sweep.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is a small-angle (~1.2°) moiré superlattice formed between a monolayer or Bernal bilayer and an N-layer rhombohedral (ABC-stacked) graphene stack. In the continuum-model band structure, the first conduction band becomes an isolated flat band whose valley Chern number is inherited from the layer-dependent Berry curvature of rhombohedral graphene and equals N. Strong Coulomb interactions polarize spin and valley, producing an orbital Chern insulator at odd integer moiré fillings. Dual graphite gates independently tune carrier density n and displacement field D, and Chern numbers are read out from quantized Hall resistance and from Landau-fan slopes through the Streda formula.

Load-bearing premise

Each measured device is exactly the stack it is labeled as — a clean, single rhombohedral domain at the intended twist with no accidental h-BN alignment — so the Chern number inferred from transport is set by N rather than by disorder, stacking faults, or device-specific displacement field; this premise is checked mainly by Raman mapping, with one new device per N and the N=5 sample carried over from earlier work.

What would settle it

Fabricate a (1+3)L stack with an independent rhombohedral-order check and a different twist angle, then measure the Chern number at ν=1; if it is not 3, or if a stacking fault in any device can be shown to control the observed C, the C=N design rule is falsified.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Chern number becomes a design parameter: choosing N fixes C, so (1+3)L, (1+4)L, and (1+5)L give C=3, 4, and 5 at ν=1.
  • A single device can be reconfigured: in (2+4)L, displacement field switches between C=3 and C=4 QAH states, and in (1+3)L near ν=3 the sign of C can be reversed.
  • Higher Chern numbers mean more dissipationless chiral edge channels, enabling a gate-controlled topological transistor whose edge-channel count changes by voltage.
  • High-C Chern bands are candidate hosts for fractional Chern insulators and non-Abelian excitations; the paper reports hints of unconventional Chern insulators at ν=3/2 and ν=7/3.
  • The recipe extends to thicker rhombohedral stacks, so even larger programmable Chern numbers are in reach.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the edge-channel picture is two-terminal conductance: a (1+4)L device in the quantized state should show a plateau near 4e²/h, and switching D in (2+4)L should change that conductance in integer steps.
  • The C=N rule is a plateau, not a universal constant: the paper's own Hartree-Fock maps show the valley Chern number depends on twist angle and interlayer potential, so thicker stacks or different θ will require optimized D to stay on the plateau — mapping that plateau for each N is a natural next step.
  • The layer-engineering logic may transfer beyond carbon: any material family with rhombohedral-stack-like layer-dependent Berry curvature could in principle use the same twist recipe to pre-set a Chern number.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) states in twisted monolayer-rhombohedral N-layer graphene, denoted (1+N)L, with N = 3, 4, 5. At moiré filling ν = 1, the authors observe quantized Hall resistances h/3e², h/4e², and h/5e², vanishing longitudinal resistance, magnetic hysteresis to zero field, and Landau-fan slopes consistent with Chern numbers C = 3, 4, 5, respectively. They further report a sign-switchable |C| = 3 state at ν ≈ 3 in the (1+3)L device, controlled by doping or displacement field, and a displacement-field-driven transition between C = 3 and C = 4 at ν = 1 in twisted Bernal bilayer-rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, (2+4)L. Self-consistent Hartree-Fock continuum-model calculations are presented as supporting the layer-dependent Chern numbers and the D-driven transition.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a significant advance: it would establish layer number as a programmable knob for high Chern numbers and demonstrate in-situ electrical switching between distinct QAH states in a single device. The transport evidence is internally consistent, with quantized plateaus, hysteresis, and Streda slopes all pointing to the same Chern indices. The calculations provide a plausible theoretical framework. However, the paper's headline 'C = N layer-engineering rule' is currently supported by exactly one device per N, with different twist angles and displacement fields across devices, and by calculations that explicitly show topology depends on θ and Δ. The D-driven transition in (2+4)L is a strong experimental result, but the quantitative connection between measured D and calculated Δ is not given. These gaps undermine the 'programmable layer-engineering' conclusion as presently stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 1c; Extended Data Fig. 10] The central claim that C = N is set by the layer number N rests on one device per N (D1, D2, D3), at different twist angles (θ = 1.29°, 1.16°, 1.39°) and different optimized displacement fields (D = -0.470, -0.508, -0.620 V/nm). Device D3 is reused from ref. 39. Extended Data Fig. 10 explicitly shows that the calculated valley Chern number depends on both θ and Δ, with gapless regions (crosses). Since no second device at fixed N and no in-situ θ variation at fixed N is provided, the observed C = 3, 4, 5 could in principle be controlled by the different θ or D values rather than by N. This is not an internal inconsistency, but it is load-bearing for the paper's 'layer-engineered Chern number' design principle. The authors should either supply additional devices at the same N with different θ/D, or present a clear argument—with data—that the observed C is robust across the accessible θ-D p
  2. [Methods (Band structure calculation) and Fig. 4a] The claimed agreement between the D-driven C = 3 ↔ 4 transition in device D4 and the Hartree-Fock calculation is not quantitatively testable from the text. Fig. 4a shows band structures at Δ = 11.5 meV and Δ = 10.0 meV, while the experimental transition occurs between D = -0.669 and D = -0.602 V/nm. No mapping from the experimental displacement field D to the model interlayer potential Δ is provided, nor is the built-in offset D0 and its uncertainty discussed. The statement 'agrees well with band structure calculations' therefore lacks a directly checkable basis. This does not invalidate the experimental observation of two quantized states at different D, but it weakens the theoretical-interpretation component of the central advance.
  3. [Extended Data Fig. 8/9] The claims of an unconventional Chern insulator at ν = 3/2 and an incipient fractional Chern insulator near ν = 7/3 are presented as supporting the platform's promise, but the data shown (anomalous Hall with hysteresis, dispersive fan diagrams) do not exhibit quantized ρxy at zero field. The authors attribute this to disorder or contacts, which is reasonable. However, these observations are not load-bearing for the main claims, and the language should be consistently labeled as 'signatures' rather than established states.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 4f caption / main text] The main text (Section 'Displacement-field-induced Chern number switching') refers to a 'red vertical line' in Fig. 4b, while the Fig. 4f caption says 'yellow vertical line'. Please make these consistent.
  2. [Methods / Device D3] The statement that device D3 was previously studied in ref. 39 should be highlighted earlier, ideally in the main text or in the Fig. 1 caption, because the N = 5 data point is not a new independent measurement. This is relevant to the one-device-per-N concern.
  3. [Extended Data Tab. 1] A table of devices with all relevant parameters (θ, W/L, contact quality, measurement temperature, D range) would help the reader assess device-to-device variability. Currently only twist angle and some D values are scattered in captions.
  4. [Throughout] Several typographical and formatting issues should be corrected: 'Cuire temperature' should be 'Curie temperature'; 'moire' should be 'moiré' consistently; and the Streda formula is named after Středa, so 'Streda' is acceptable but should be consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: Chern numbers are measured via transport; the band calculation is supporting, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—C=N in (1+N)L graphene and the D-driven C=3↔4 transition in (2+4)L graphene—are established by direct transport measurements: quantized Hall resistance plateaus at h/Ce^2 and Chern numbers extracted from Landau fan slopes via the Streda formula. These observables do not depend on the Hartree-Fock band calculation for their values. The band calculation is used to interpret the states, and its Chern numbers are computed at the experimentally measured twist angles and displacement-field-derived interlayer potentials; the Chern number is a discrete topological index rather than a continuous parameter fitted to the Hall plateaus. Extended Data Fig. 10 explicitly maps Chern number versus twist angle and interlayer potential and marks gapless regions with crosses, showing that the calculation predicts parameter-dependent topology rather than encoding C=N by assumption. The one notable self-citation is ref. 39, which previously reported the N=5 device D3; however, the present paper includes that device's measured hysteresis and the cited result is a transport measurement that is externally checkable, not an unverified theorem or fitted value. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, mediators, or conserved quantities. The 'topological transistor' is an application concept, not an invented physical entity. The free parameters are theory-side inputs (Δ, screening parameters, gate offsets) that emulate experimental conditions rather than quantities fitted directly to the Hall plateaus.

free parameters (3)
  • Interlayer potential difference Δ = 9.0, 12.5, 11.0, 11.5, 10.0 meV (per device)
    Used in Hartree-Fock band calculations to emulate experimental displacement fields; the topological phase diagrams in Extended Data Fig. 10 depend on Δ, so these choices select the C=N regions.
  • Hartree-Fock screening parameters d_s and ε_r = d_s=28 nm (53 nm for (1+5)L), ε_r=20
    Dual-gate screened Coulomb parameters chosen 'to emulate the experiment'; they affect bandwidth and interaction strength, though not necessarily the integer Chern number.
  • Density and displacement offsets n0, D0 = not quoted in text
    Calibrated from quantum oscillations to convert gate voltages into n and D; errors would shift ν and D and thus the apparent locations of the Chern states.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Continuum/SWMC tight-binding model for twisted multilayer graphene is valid for these stacks.
    Used to compute single-particle band structures; parameters are given in Supplementary Information and in Methods.
  • domain assumption At odd integer moiré fillings, Coulomb interactions produce a spin/valley-polarized orbital Chern band whose Hall conductance equals the valley Chern number of the first conduction band.
    This connects the calculated valley Chern number C=N to the measured quantized ρxy at ν=1; relied on refs 44-45.
  • domain assumption The Streda formula dn/dB = C e/h is applicable to the Landau fan data at fixed D.
    Used to extract C=3,4,5 from fan-slope analysis; assumes a single topological band without multi-band contamination.
  • domain assumption Raman mapping and optical contrast unambiguously identify rhombohedral stacking and layer number in the assembled devices.
    Foundation of the N-dependence claim; each layer configuration is represented by one device.
  • domain assumption Self-consistent Hartree-Fock treatment of the first five conduction bands preserves the single-particle band topology.
    Methods states 'the band topology remains unchanged' after including Hartree-Fock terms; this justifies attributing the experimental C to the calculated valley Chern number.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 15441 in / 19699 out tokens · 211683 ms · 2026-08-03T09:20:46.043458+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Layer-engineered quantum anomalous Hall effect in twisted rhombohedral graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KDL2EGDU

@misc{pith2026260114014,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Layer-engineered quantum anomalous Hall effect in twisted rhombohedral graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KDL2EGDU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.14014}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Realizing programmable topological states in quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) insulators requires the ability to design and dynamically tune their topological invariant, the Chern number C. Here, we report a designer QAH platform based on twisted rhombohedral graphene family, in which C becomes a programmable and electrically tunable degree of freedom. By engineering the layer configuration in twisted monolayer-rhombohedral N-layer graphene, denoted as (1+N)L, we realize QAH states with C=N at moire filling v=1, where the layer number N=3,4,5 directly sets the Chern number. Beyond such static layer programming, we demonstrate in-situ electrical control. In a twisted monolayer-trilayer device, the sign of C (chirality) can be switched by electrostatic doping or displacement field. Most strikingly, in twisted Bernal bilayer-rhombohedral tetralayer graphene denoted as (2+4)L, we drive a displacement-field-induced topological phase transition between two distinct QAH states with C=3 and C=4 in a single device. Our work establishes a layer-engineered and electrically tunable platform that transitions topological quantum matter from discovery to design, opening the way toward on-demand engineering of correlated topological states and reconfigurable topological electronics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Flat-Band Stoner Instability and Peierls-Phase Origin of the Transdimensional Anomalous Hall Effect in Rhombohedral Graphite

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Microscopic Hartree-Fock theory attributes transdimensional AHE in rhombohedral graphite to Stoner-driven valley polarization modulated by Peierls phase and orbital magnetism.

  2. Engineering electrically-switchable quantum anomalous Hall states by spin-orbit coupling

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Proximity to WSe2 engineers the magnetic energy landscape in tMBG via induced SOC, enabling nonvolatile gate switching of QAH states and gate tuning between |C|=2, |C|=1, and metallic regimes without magnetic reset.

  3. Tunable high-Chern-number Chern insulators in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene/hBN moir\'e superlattices

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    New symmetry-broken Chern insulators with C = +3, ±2, ±1 at v = -2.5 or -2.6, plus the known C = -4 at v = -1, were observed in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene/hBN moiré superlattices and shown to be tunable via twis...

  4. Emerging network model in a twisted monolayer-rhombohedral graphene

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In twisted monolayer–rhombohedral graphene, a realistic parameter regime hosts coexisting nearly flat localized states and quasi-1D propagating modes, forming a hybrid electronic network.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    parity anomaly

    F. D. M. Haldane. Model for a quantum Hall effect without Landau levels: condensed-matter realization of the "parity anomaly". Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015-2018, (1988)

    2015

  2. [2]

    Chang et al

    C.-Z. Chang et al. Experimental observation of the quantu m anomalous Hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator. Science 340, 167-170, (2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    Chang, C.-X

    C.-Z. Chang, C.-X. Liu & A. H. MacDonald. Colloquium: Quantum anomalous Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 011002, (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    Y .-F. Wang, H. Yao, C.-D. Gong & D. N. Sheng. Fractional quantum Hall effect in topological flat bands with Chern number two. Phys. Rev. B 86, 201101, (2012)

    2012

  5. [5]

    Yang, Z.-C

    S. Yang, Z.-C. Gu, K. Sun & S. Das Sarma. Topological flat band models with arbitrary Chern numbers. Phys. Rev. B 86, 241112, (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    Z. Liu, E. J. Ber gholtz, H. Fan & A. M. Läuc hli. Fractional Chern insulators in topological flat bands with higher Chern number. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 186805, (2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    Möller & N

    G. Möller & N. R. Cooper. Fractional Chern insu lators in Harper-Hofstadter bands with higher Chern number. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 126401, (2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    Ge et al

    J. Ge et al. High-Chern-number and high-temperature quantum Hall effect without Landau levels. Natl. Sci. Rev. 7, 1280-1287, (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    Deng et al

    Y . Deng et al. Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4. Science 367, 895-900, (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    Lian et al

    Z. Lian et al. Antiferromagnetic quantum anomalous Hall effect under spin flips and flops. Nature 641, 70-75, (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Serlin et al

    M. Serlin et al. Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall ef fect in a moiré heterostructure. Science 367, 900-903, (2020)

    2020

  12. [12]

    Li et al

    T. Li et al. Quantum anomalous Hall effect from intertwined moiré bands. Nature 600, 641-646, (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    Park et al

    H. Park et al. Observation of fractionally qu antized anomalous Hall effect. Nature 622, 74-79, (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    Xu et al

    F. Xu et al. Observation of integer and fractional quantum anomalous Hall effects in twisted bilayer MoTe2. Phys. Rev. X 13, 031037, (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    Lu et al

    Z. Lu et al. Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene. Nature 626, 759-764, (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    Su et al

    R. Su et al. Moiré-driven topological electroni c crystals in twisted graphene. Nature 637, 1084– 1089, (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Zhao et al

    Y .-F. Zhao et al. Tuning the Chern number in quantum anomalous Hall insulators. Nature 588, 419- 423, (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    Zhang, J

    F. Zhang, J. Jung, G. A. Fiete, Q. Niu & A. H. MacDonald. Spontaneous quantum Hall states in chirally stacked few-layer graphene systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 156801, (2011)

    2011

  19. [19]

    B. L. Chittari, G. Chen, Y . Zhang, F. Wang & J. Jung. Gate-tunable topological flat bands in trilayer graphene boron-nitride moiré superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 016401, (2019)

    2019

  20. [20]

    Y . Park, Y . Kim, B. L. Chittari & J. Jung. Topo logical flat bands in rhombohedral tetralayer and multilayer graphene on hexagonal boron nitride moiré superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 108, 155406, (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    M. Koshino. Interlayer screening effect in graphene multilayers with ABA and ABC stacking. Phys. Rev. B 81, 125304, (2010). 11

    2010

  22. [22]

    N. B. Kopnin, T. T. Heikkilä & G. E. V ol ovik. High-temperature su rface superconductivity in topological flat-band systems. Phys. Rev. B 83, 220503, (2011)

    2011

  23. [23]

    Chen et al

    G. Chen et al. Tunable correlated Chern insulator and ferromagnetism in a moiré superlattice. Nature 579, 56-61, (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    Han et al

    T. Han et al. Orbital multiferroicity in pentalayer rhombohedral graphene. Nature 623, 41-47, (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Ding et al

    J. Ding et al. Spin–Orbit-Driven Quarter Semime tals in Rhombohedral Graphene. Adv. Mater., e12713, (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Shi et al

    Y . Shi et al. Electronic phase separation in multilayer rhombohedral graphite. Nature 584, 210-214, (2020)

    2020

  27. [27]

    Zhou et al

    W. Zhou et al. Layer-polarized ferromagnetism in rhombohedral multilayer graphene. Nat. Commun. 15, 2597, (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    Han et al

    T. Han et al. Large quantum anomalous Hall effect in spin-orbit proximitized rhombohedral graphene. Science 384, 647-651, (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Sha et al

    Y . Sha et al. Observation of a Chern insulator in crys talline ABCA-tetralayer graphene with spin- orbit coupling. Science 384, 414-419, (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Xie et al

    J. Xie et al. Tunable fractional Chern insulators in rhombohedral graphene superlattices. Nat. Mater. 24, 1042-1048, (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Lu et al

    Z. Lu et al. Extended quantum anomalous Hall states in graphene/hBN moiré superlattices. Nature 637, 1090–1095, (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Choi et al

    Y . Choi et al. Superconductivity and quantized anomalous Hall effect in rhombohedral graphene. Nature 639, 342–347, (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    Ding et al

    J. Ding et al. Electric-field switchable chirality in r hombohedral graphene Chern insulators stabilized by tungsten diselenide. Phys. Rev. X 15, 011052, (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath & E. Khalaf. Fam ily of ideal Chern flatba nds with arbitrary Chern number in chiral twisted graphene multilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 176404, (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    J. Liu, Z. Ma, J. Gao & X. Dai. Quantum valley Hall effect, orbital magnetism, and anomalous Hall effect in twisted multilayer graphene systems. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031021, (2019)

    2019

  36. [36]

    Wang & Z

    J. Wang & Z. Liu. Hierarchy of ideal flatba nds in chiral twisted multilayer graphene models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 176403, (2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    Liu et al

    Q. Liu et al. Odd-Chern-number quantum anomalous Hall effect at even filling in moire rhombohedral heptalayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 016602, (2026)

    2026

  38. [38]

    Xiang et al

    H. Xiang et al. Continuously tunable anomalous Hall crystals in rhombohedral heptalayer graphene. arXiv:2502.18031, (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Liu et al

    N. Liu et al. Diverse high-Chern-number quantum anomalous Hall insulators in twisted rhombohedral graphene. arXiv:2507.11347, (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Dong et al

    J. Dong et al. Observation of Integer and fractional Chern insulators in high Chern number flatbands. arXiv:2507.09908, (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Wang et al

    W. Wang et al. Programmable quantum anomalous Hall insulator in twisted crystalline flatbands. arXiv:2507.10875, (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Cao et al

    Y . Cao et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43-50, (2018)

    2018

  43. [43]

    Kim et al

    K. Kim et al. van der Waals heterostructures with high accuracy rotational alignment. Nano Lett. 16, 1989-1995, (2016). 12

    1989

  44. [44]

    Zhang, D

    Y .-H. Zhang, D. Mao, Y . Cao, P. Jarillo-Herrero & T. Senthil. Nearly flat Chern bands in moiré superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 99, 075127, (2019)

    2019

  45. [45]

    C. Wu. Orbital analogue of the quantum anomalous Hall effect in p-band systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 186807, (2008)

    2008

  46. [46]

    Koshino & E

    M. Koshino & E. McCann. Trigonal warping and Berry's phase N π in ABC-stacked multilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 80, 165409, (2009)

    2009

  47. [47]

    Polshyn et al

    H. Polshyn et al. Topological charge density waves at half-integer filling of a moiré superlattice. Nat. Phys. 18, 42-47, (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    Polshyn et al

    H. Polshyn et al. Electrical switching of magnetic order in an orbital Chern insulator. Nature 588, 66-70, (2020)

    2020

  49. [49]

    J. Zhu, J. J. Su & A. H. MacDonald. V oltage-controlled magnetic reversal in orbital Chern insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 227702, (2020)

    2020

  50. [50]

    Zhang, X

    S. Zhang, X. Dai & J. Liu. Spin-polarized nematic order, quantum valley Hall states, and field- tunable topological transitions in twisted multilayer graphene systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 026403, (2022)

    2022

  51. [51]

    Liang et al

    W. Liang et al. Chern number tunable quantum anom alous Hall effect in compensated antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 116603, (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman & S. Das Sarma. Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083-1159, (2008)

    2008

  53. [53]

    Sterdyniak, C

    A. Sterdyniak, C. Repellin, B. A. Bernevig & N. Regnault. Series of Abelian and non-Abelian states in C>1 fractional Chern insulators. Phys. Rev. B 87, 205137, (2013)

    2013

  54. [54]

    Li et al

    Z. Li et al. Fractionalization and entanglement of high Chern insulators. arXiv:2512.21612, (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Wang et al

    X. Wang et al. Family of high-Chern-number orbital magnets in twisted rhombohedral graphene. arXiv:2601.01087, (2026). 13 Figures Fig. 1 | Layer-dependent QAH effect in twisted monolayer-rhombohedral multilayer graphene family. a, Device schematic with dual graphite gates. A moiré superlattice forms between monolayer (or bilayer) graphene and rhombohedral...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026