Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 91 references

Exactly Solvable Topological Phase Transition in a Quantum Dimer Model

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single edge weight α=3 exactly separates a Z2 spin liquid from a columnar state in a solvable quantum dimer model.

desk verdict Worth refereeing, but the headline 'analytically confirming' outruns what is actually proven: the min-entropy jump rests on an imported cylinder identity that needs rederivation for this weighted non-bipartite lattice. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.15377 v4 pith:IT454BZD submitted 2026-01-21 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MPquant-ph

Laura Shou , Jeet Shah , Matthew Lerner-Brecher , Amol Aggarwal , Alexei Borodin , Victor Galitski This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MPquant-ph MSC 82B2082B2682B23 PACS 75.10.Jm64.60.-i05.50.+q
keywords quantumdimermodelRokhsar-KivelsontopologicalphasetransitionZ2spinliquidKasteleynmatrixmin-entropytriangularlatticeexactlysolvable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs a family of generalized Rokhsar–Kivelson Hamiltonians whose ground states are exactly known weighted superpositions of dimer coverings, then studies a 2×1-periodic triangular lattice with one tunable horizontal edge weight α. It claims a continuous quantum phase transition at α=3: for α<3 the ground state is a gapped Z2 quantum spin liquid with exponentially decaying correlations and topological min-entropy log 2, while for α>3 it is a columnar ordered state with trivial min-entropy. The transition point coincides with the unique zero of an explicitly computed characteristic polynomial, and the correlation length diverges as ξ∝1/|α−3|, with finite-size scaling giving exponents β=1/8 and ν=1, consistent with the 2D Ising universality class. If correct, this provides a fully solvable example of a topological-to-trivial phase transition in a local Hamiltonian, with analytic control over the transition itself.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the generalized weighted Rokhsar–Kivelson Hamiltonian, a sum of projector terms designed so that the weighted dimer superposition |ψ_w⟩ is the unique ground state; at the RK point all equal-time correlators reduce to those of a classical edge-weighted dimer model, solvable via the Kasteleyn matrix—a weighted signed adjacency matrix whose Pfaffian counts dimer configurations. The transition is controlled by the characteristic polynomial P(e^{ikx},e^{iky}), the determinant of the 2×2 block of the Kasteleyn matrix in the infinite periodic limit, whose zero at α=3 sets the band gap and correlation length. The topological min-entropy s∞ is extracted from cylinder partition fu

What would settle it

Compute the topological min-entropy (or von Neumann topological entanglement entropy) on the same cylinder geometry to next order in 1/L, or evaluate the cylinder partition function exactly for finite L_x,L_y and compare the subleading constant against the Euler–Maclaurin prediction; a nonzero constant-order correction in the α<3 phase would invalidate the log 2 result. Alternatively, measure the vison correlator at large α; if it decays rather than staying strictly constant, the ordered phase is not columnar in the claimed sense.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a quantum dimer model with edge weight α on the triangular lattice is exactly solvable for all α and undergoes a topological phase transition at α=3. The exact ground state is |ψ_w⟩=Σ_C W(C)|C⟩, a weighted superposition of dimer coverings, with weights determined by the edge weights. For α<3, the dimer-dimer and vison correlators decay exponentially, the characteristic polynomial is nonzero everywhere on the Brillouin torus, and the topological min-entropy (Rényi entropy of order ∞) is s∞=log 2, indicating a Z2 quantum spin liquid. For α>3, the dimer-dimer correlator decays exponentially but the vison correlator is constant, and s∞=0, indicating a topologica

Load-bearing premise

The extraction of the topological min-entropy relies on the cylinder formula p_max=Z_cyl(Lx/2)²/Z_cyl(Lx) and the Euler–Maclaurin handling of the logarithmic singularity at k_y=0, an assumption that no other constant-order contribution contaminates the s∞ value in the non-bipartite weighted triangular lattice.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The model gives a concrete, exactly solvable setting where a local Hamiltonian realizes both a Z2 spin liquid and a trivial ordered phase, with the transition point located exactly at α=3.
  • All equal-time correlators in the ground state are computable in closed form through the Kasteleyn matrix, allowing the phase diagram and critical behavior to be verified analytically rather than numerically.
  • The double-dimer loop argument ties a constant vison correlator to the presence of only small loops, offering a mechanistic explanation that could be tested in other non-bipartite dimer models.
  • The analytic jump in s∞ from log 2 to 0 at α=3 confirms the change in topological order without relying on numerical subtraction of area-law terms.
  • If the 2D Ising exponents β=1/8, ν=1 hold exactly, this is a rare example of a topological-to-trivial quantum transition falling in a standard classical universality class.
  • The construction generalizes to arbitrary edge weights, so the same reverse-engineering should yield exactly solvable dimer models with other phases and transitions.
  • The paper's conjecture that periodic bipartite lattices cannot host Z2 spin liquids at the RK point is a testable claim: one could compute vison correlators or double-dimer loop statistics on other bipartite lattices with non-uniform weights.
  • The exact solvability at α=3 suggests that the critical point may be governed by a known determinantal process, potentially allowing exact computation of the vison exponent η.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The construction of weighted RK Hamiltonians is fully general, so the same reverse-engineering should yield exactly solvable dimer models with other phases and transitions; one could use it to search for double-semion or chiral spin liquids by choosing appropriate weights.
  • The paper's conjecture that periodic bipartite lattices cannot host Z2 spin liquids at the RK point, based on small-loop statistics, is a testable claim: one could examine other bipartite lattices with non-uniform weights and compute the vison correlator or double-dimer loop sizes to see whether a constant vison always appears.
  • The analytic control at α=3 suggests the critical point may be exactly solvable beyond the two-point functions, e.g. the full probability distribution of dimer configurations may be governed by a known determinantal process, allowing exact computation of the vison exponent η.
  • Away from the RK point, the transition may change character; the paper leaves open whether the Ising universality persists or becomes first order, which could be probed by adding kinetic terms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper introduces a class of generalized Rokhsar-Kivelson Hamiltonians whose ground states are arbitrary edge-weighted dimer superpositions. Focusing on a 2×1-periodic triangular lattice with a single tunable horizontal weight α, it claims an exactly solvable continuous quantum phase transition at α=3 between a Z2 quantum spin liquid (α<3) and a columnar ordered state (α>3). The evidence consists of (i) an analytic proof that dimer-dimer correlators decay exponentially off α=3 with correlation length diverging as 1/|α−3|; (ii) numerical vison correlator data showing exponential decay for α<3, power-law at α=3, and a nonzero constant for α>3; (iii) finite-size scaling of the vison correlator consistent with 2D Ising exponents; and (iv) an analytic computation of the topological min-entropy s∞, claimed to change from log2 to 0 at α=3. The min-entropy calculation is the main analytic evidence for the topological character of the transition.

Significance. The Hamiltonian construction is elegant and potentially useful: it maps a large class of weighted classical dimer models to exactly solvable RK points, and the proof of exponential decay via Paley–Wiener is rigorous and clearly presented. If the min-entropy result is correct, the paper provides a rare exactly solvable example of a topological phase transition with a parameter-free critical point. However, the topological conclusion is not yet fully established because the central min-entropy derivation relies on an imported cylinder identity whose validity for this weighted, non-bipartite lattice is not demonstrated. The paper is therefore promising but requires a substantial strengthening of the proof of Eq. (S56) before the title claim can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [SM §VIII, Eq. (S56)] The central analytic claim that the topological min-entropy changes from log2 to 0 at α=3 is based on the identity p_max = Z_cyl(Lx/2, Ly)^2 / Z_cyl(Lx, Ly) in Eq. (S56), which is imported from Ref. [S28] without derivation. This identity is nontrivial: it requires that the largest eigenvalue of the reduced density matrix be determined by the ratio of cylinder partition functions in a specific boundary-condition sector, and it is not valid for an arbitrary dimer model on a cylinder. The manuscript does not specify the boundary conditions used to define Z_cyl(Lx/2) and Z_cyl(Lx), nor does it prove that the formula extends to the present weighted, non-bipartite triangular lattice. Because the entire log2→0 jump of s∞ rests on this step, the topological characterization is not yet analytically established. Please provide a self-contained proof of (S56) for this model, or a precise statement
  2. [SM §VIII, Eqs. (S70)–(S77)] The evaluation of the ratio (S56) involves taking Lx→∞ at fixed Ly and then Ly→∞. The text asserts, without presenting estimates, that the characteristic-polynomial ratios in Eq. (S70) tend to 1 by Euler–Maclaurin and that the regularized sum in Eq. (S71) has no O(1) remainder. These limits are delicate because s∞ is by definition a constant-order term: any unaccounted constant contribution from the half-cylinder/full-cylinder determinant ratio, from the detM_2^{(y)} factors, or from the subtraction of the ky→0 logarithmic singularity would change the result. In particular, the Taylor expansion (S76) is given only to leading order, and it is not shown that the remaining terms are smooth enough for the Euler–Maclaurin formula (S77) to yield a vanishing constant remainder. Please supply the missing error estimates or a more detailed derivation.
  3. [SM §IV and Main Text Fig. 5] The abstract states that the dimer-dimer correlator decays exponentially on both sides with correlation length ξ ∝ 1/|α−3|. The analytic proof (SM Theorem 2 and §IV) establishes exponential decay and gives an explicit correlation length for the inverse Kasteleyn matrix (Green's function) along a vertical path, ξ_G ∼ 2/|α−3| (Eq. (S42)). It does not prove that the dimer-dimer correlator itself has the same correlation length; the plotted dimer-dimer inverse correlation lengths in Fig. 5 are numerical fits. Either prove the corresponding statement for the dimer-dimer correlator or qualify the abstract's claim as applying to the Green's function rather than the dimer-dimer correlator.
minor comments (4)
  1. [SM Fig. S9 / Eq. (S56)] Fig. S9 labels the total cylinder width as 2Lx while Eq. (S56) uses Lx/2 as the half-length. Please align the notation and define Lx clearly to avoid confusion about which length is used in the partition functions.
  2. [SM §VIII, Remark 1] Remark 1 states that finite-size numerics confirm the analytical s∞ and TEE values, but no data are shown. Please add a figure or table with the extracted p_max and the constant term, or remove the remark.
  3. [Main Text Fig. 6 / SM §VI] The exponents β=1/8 and ν=1 are inserted a priori and the curve collapse is then checked; 'extract critical exponents' overstates what is done. Please rephrase to 'consistent with the 2D Ising values' or perform an unbiased fit.
  4. [Main Text Fig. 4(c)] In the ordered phase the vison correlator tends to a nonzero constant that depends on α (roughly 0.95–0.97) rather than to 1; a brief comment on this value and its α-dependence would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the α=3 transition and the min-entropy jump are computed from the Kasteleyn characteristic polynomial, not fitted or assumed.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are (i) the α=3 critical point, (ii) exponential dimer-dimer decay and ξ∝1/|α−3|, (iii) vison correlator behavior, and (iv) the topological min-entropy jump log2→0. None of these is an input fitted to the desired output. The critical point is the zero of P(e^{ik_x},e^{ik_y}) = 4 sin² k_y + |α−e^{ik_y}−e^{−ik_x}−e^{−ik_x}e^{−ik_y}|² (SM Eq. S29), obtained directly from the Kasteleyn matrix for the stated weights; no parameter is adjusted to land on α=3. The exponential decay and correlation length follow from a Paley–Wiener argument after contour integration (SM Eqs. S31–S42), again from P. The min-entropy calculation (SM Sect. VIII) imports the cylinder identity p_max = Z_cyl(Lx/2)²/Z_cyl(Lx) from Stéphan–Misguich–Pasquier [S28]—an external source with no author overlap—and then evaluates the resulting Kasteleyn determinants. The log2 vs 0 distinction emerges from the k_y→0 behavior of det M2^{(y)}, Eqs. S72–S75, specifically the branch of r_+(1,α) and the values A12(0)=−1/2 for α<3 vs 0 for α>3; this is a direct computation, not a tautology. The only noticeable self-citation is Ref. [62] for the vison determinant formula (Eq. 8), but that formula is a standard determinantal identity and the main topological claim (the min-entropy jump) does not use it, so it is not load-bearing. The finite-size scaling in Fig. 6 fixes β=1/8, ν=1 and demonstrates collapse, so it is a consistency check rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The genuine caveat—validity of the imported cylinder identity for the weighted non-bipartite lattice and the Euler–Maclaurin subtraction of the k_y→0 singularity—is a verification/correctness risk, not a circularity, because the identity is external and the subsequent evaluation is independent of the target result.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model has one tunable parameter α; the only fitted quantities are the critical exponents used in the scaling collapse. The central s∞ derivation imports an established cylinder-extraction method and standard Kasteleyn/Pfaffian machinery; no new particles, forces, or mediators are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Critical exponents β, ν = β=1/8, ν=1
    Chosen to collapse the finite-size scaling data for the vison correlator (Fig. 6, SM Sec. VI); the values are asserted to match 2D Ising, not derived from the model.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Any two dimer coverings of a rectangular domain of the triangular lattice are connected by 4- and 6-cycle flips (Hartarsky–Lichev–Toninelli).
    Used in SM Section I to prove uniqueness of the weighted ground state |ψ_w⟩ on finite simply connected domains.
  • standard math The Pfaffian of the Kasteleyn matrix gives the weighted dimer partition function and correlation functions (Kasteleyn; Kenyon).
    Basis for all correlator formulas, Eqs. (6) and (8), and the partition-function ratios in SM Section VIII.
  • domain assumption The Stéphan–Misguich–Pasquier relation p_max = Z_cyl(Lx/2)^2/Z_cyl(Lx) extracts the topological min-entropy on a cylinder.
    Assumed to hold for this non-bipartite weighted model; used in SM Section VIII A, Eq. (S56), to obtain s∞.
  • standard math Paley–Wiener theorem: exponential decay of Fourier coefficients follows from analyticity of the symbol in a strip.
    Used in SM Section IV to establish exponential decay of K^{-1} and dimer-dimer correlators for α≠3.
  • standard math Euler–Maclaurin summation with a subtracted logarithmic singularity yields the constant term in S∞(L).
    Used in SM Section VIII A, Eq. (S77), to extract s∞.
  • domain assumption Exponential decay of equal-time dimer and vison correlators implies a gapped Z2 spin liquid.
    Main Text, section 'Topological phase transition on the triangular lattice'; the gap implication is asserted, not derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exactly Solvable Topological Phase Transition in a Quantum Dimer Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IT454BZD

@misc{pith2026260115377,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exactly Solvable Topological Phase Transition in a Quantum Dimer Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IT454BZD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.15377}
}
abstract

We consider a family of generalized Rokhsar-Kivelson (RK) Hamiltonians, which are reverse-engineered to have an arbitrary edge-weighted superposition of dimer coverings as their exact ground state at the RK point. We focus on a quantum dimer model on the triangular lattice, with doubly periodic edge weights. For simplicity we consider a $2\times1$ periodic model in which all weights are set to one except for a tunable horizontal edge weight labeled $\alpha$. We analytically show that the model exhibits a continuous quantum phase transition at $\alpha=3$, changing from a topological $\mathbb{Z}_2$ quantum spin liquid ($\alpha<3$) to a columnar ordered state ($\alpha>3$). The dimer-dimer correlator decays exponentially on both sides of the transition with the correlation length $\xi\propto1/|\alpha-3|$ and as a power-law at criticality. The vison correlator exhibits an exponential decay in the spin liquid phase, but becomes a constant in the ordered phase, which we explain in terms of loop statistics of the double-dimer model. Using finite-size scaling of the vison correlator, we extract critical exponents consistent with the 2D Ising universality class. Additionally, we analytically show that the topological R\'enyi entropy of order $\infty$ (topological min-entropy) changes from $\log2$ for the quantum spin liquid phase $\alpha<3$, to $0$ for the ordered phase $\alpha>3$, thereby analytically confirming the topological nature of the phase transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.15377 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The quantum dimer model on the weighted triangular lattice as given in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. A plaquette [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Left) Path in the triangular lattice for the dimer-dimer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dimer-dimer and vison correlators for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Inverse correlation lengths for the dimer-dimer and vison [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Finite-size scaling for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductivity and the Quantum Hard-Core Dimer Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2376 (1988)

    1988

  2. [2]

    Moessner and K

    R. Moessner and K. S. Raman, Quantum dimer models, inIn- troduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Experiments, Theory(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011) pp. 437–479

    2011

  3. [3]

    Moessner and S

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Resonating Valence Bond Phase in the Triangular Lattice Quantum Dimer Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1881 (2001)

    2001

  4. [4]

    Moessner, S

    R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and P. Chandra, Phase diagram of the hexagonal lattice quantum dimer model, Phys. Rev. B64, 144416 (2001)

    2001

  5. [5]

    Misguich and F

    G. Misguich and F. Mila, Quantum dimer model on the trian- gular lattice: Semiclassical and variational approaches to vison dispersion and condensation, Phys. Rev. B77, 134421 (2008)

    2008

  6. [6]

    Ioselevich, D

    A. Ioselevich, D. A. Ivanov, and M. V . Feigelman, Ground-state properties of the Rokhsar-Kivelson dimer model on the triangu- lar lattice, Phys. Rev. B66, 174405 (2002)

    2002

  7. [7]

    T. M. Schlittler, R. Mosseri, and T. Barthel, Phase diagram of the hexagonal lattice quantum dimer model: Order parameters, ground-state energy, and gaps, Phys. Rev. B96, 195142 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Balents, M

    L. Balents, M. P. A. Fisher, and S. M. Girvin, Fractionaliza- tion in an easy-axis Kagome antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B65, 224412 (2002)

    2002

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    Balasubramanian, V

    S. Balasubramanian, V . Galitski, and A. Vishwanath, Classical vertex model dualities in a family of two-dimensional frustrated quantum antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B106, 195127 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Balasubramanian, D

    S. Balasubramanian, D. Bulmash, V . Galitski, and A. Vish- wanath, Interplay of symmetry breaking and deconfinement in three-dimensional quantum vertex models, Phys. Rev. B110, L180401 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    J. Shah, G. Nambiar, A. V . Gorshkov, and V . Galitski, A quantum monomer-dimer model on Penrose tilings (2025), arXiv:2503.15588

    2025

  4. [12]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 016502 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Hermele, M

    M. Hermele, M. P. A. Fisher, and L. Balents, Pyrochlore pho- tons: TheU(1)spin liquid in aS= 1/2three-dimensional frustrated magnet, Phys. Rev. B69, 064404 (2004)

    2004

  6. [14]

    Moessner and S

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Ising and dimer models in two and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B68, 054405 (2003)

    2003

  7. [15]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann. Phys.321, 2 (2006), arxiv:cond-mat/0506438

    2006 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, An- nals of Physics303, 2 (2003)

    A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, An- nals of Physics303, 2 (2003)

    2003

  9. [17]

    Wen, Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids, Phys

    X.-G. Wen, Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B65, 165113 (2002)

    2002

  10. [18]

    Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Systems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons (Oxford University Press, 2007)

    X.-G. Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Systems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons (Oxford University Press, 2007)

    2007

  11. [19]

    M. A. Levin and X.-G. Wen, String-net condensation: A physi- cal mechanism for topological phases, Phys. Rev. B71, 045110 (2005)

    2005

  12. [20]

    Moessner, S

    R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and E. Fradkin, Short-ranged res- onating valence bond physics, quantum dimer models, and Ising gauge theories, Phys. Rev. B65, 024504 (2001)

    2001

  13. [21]

    Senthil and M

    T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher, Fractionalization, topological order, and cuprate superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B63, 134521 (2001)

    2001

  14. [22]

    Senthil and M

    T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher, Fractionalization in the cuprates: Detecting the topological order, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 292 (2001)

    2001

  15. [23]

    Misguich, D

    G. Misguich, D. Serban, and V . Pasquier, Quantum dimer model on the Kagome lattice: Solvable dimer-liquid and Ising gauge theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 137202 (2002)

    2002

  16. [24]

    A. M. Essin and M. Hermele, Classifying fractionalization: Symmetry classification of gapped𭟋 2 spin liquids in two di- mensions, Phys. Rev. B87, 104406 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kalinowski, R. Sama- jdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator...

    2021

  18. [26]

    Verresen, M

    R. Verresen, M. D. Lukin, and A. Vishwanath, Prediction of Toric Code Topological Order from Rydberg Blockade, Phys. Rev. X11, 031005 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    J. Shah, G. Nambiar, A. V . Gorshkov, and V . Galitski, Quantum Spin Ice in Three-Dimensional Rydberg Atom Arrays, Phys. Rev. X15, 011025 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Z. Zeng, G. Giudici, and H. Pichler, Quantum dimer models with Rydberg gadgets, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L012006 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Z. Yan, R. Samajdar, Y .-C. Wang, S. Sachdev, and Z. Y . Meng, Triangular lattice quantum dimer model with variable dimer density, Nat. Commun.13, 5799 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    P. W. Kasteleyn, The statistics of dimers on a lattice: I. the num- ber of dimer arrangements on a quadratic lattice, Physica27, 1209 (1961)

    1961

  23. [31]

    P. W. Kasteleyn, Dimer statistics and phase transitions, J. Math. Phys.4, 287 (1963)

    1963

  24. [32]

    H. N. Temperley and M. E. Fisher, Dimer problem in statistical mechanics-an exact result, Phil. Mag.6, 1061 (1961)

    1961

  25. [33]

    M. E. Fisher, Statistical mechanics of dimers on a plane lattice, Phys. Rev.124, 1664 (1961)

    1961

  26. [34]

    H. Cohn, R. Kenyon, and J. Propp, A variational principle for domino tilings, J. Amer. Math. Soc.14, 297 (2001)

    2001

  27. [35]

    Kenyon, A

    R. Kenyon, A. Okounkov, and S. Sheffield, Dimers and amoe- bae, Ann. of Math. (2)163, 1019 (2006)

    2006

  28. [36]

    Boutillier, Pattern densities in non-frozen planar dimer mod- els, Comm

    C. Boutillier, Pattern densities in non-frozen planar dimer mod- els, Comm. Math. Phys.271, 55 (2007)

    2007

  29. [38]

    Chhita, K

    S. Chhita, K. Johansson, and B. Young, Asymptotic domino statistics in the Aztec diamond, Ann. Appl. Probab.25, 1232 (2015)

    2015

  30. [39]

    Chhita and B

    S. Chhita and B. Young, Coupling functions for domino tilings of Aztec diamonds, Adv. Math.259, 173 (2014)

    2014

  31. [40]

    Chhita and K

    S. Chhita and K. Johansson, Domino statistics of the two- periodic Aztec diamond, Adv. Math.294, 37 (2016)

    2016

  32. [41]

    Berggren and M

    T. Berggren and M. Duits, Correlation functions for determi- nantal processes defined by infinite block Toeplitz minors, Adv. Math.356, 106766, 48 (2019)

    2019

  33. [42]

    Duits and A

    M. Duits and A. B. J. Kuijlaars, The two-periodic Aztec dia- mond and matrix valued orthogonal polynomials, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)23, 1075 (2021)

    2021

  34. [43]

    Gorin,Lectures on random lozenge tilings, Cambridge Stud- ies in Advanced Mathematics, V ol

    V . Gorin,Lectures on random lozenge tilings, Cambridge Stud- ies in Advanced Mathematics, V ol. 193 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2021) pp. viii+250

    2021

  35. [44]

    Borodin and M

    A. Borodin and M. Duits, Biased2×2periodic Aztec diamond and an elliptic curve, Probab. Theory and Relat. Fields187, 259 (2023)

    2023

  36. [45]

    Berggren and A

    T. Berggren and A. Borodin, Geometry of the doubly periodic aztec dimer model (2025)

    2025

  37. [46]

    Boutillier and B

    C. Boutillier and B. Tili `ere, Fock’s dimer model on the Aztec diamond, arXiv:2405.20284 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  38. [47]

    C. L. Henley, From classical to quantum dynamics at rokhsar– kivelson points, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter16, S891 7 (2004)

    2004

  39. [48]

    stochastic matrix form

    C. Castelnovo, C. Chamon, C. Mudry, and P. Pujol, From quantum mechanics to classical statistical physics: Generalized rokhsar–kivelson hamiltonians and the “stochastic matrix form” decomposition, Annals of Physics318, 316 (2005)

    2005

  40. [49]

    W. P. Thurston, Conway’s tiling groups, Amer. Math. Monthly 97, 757 (1990)

    1990

  41. [50]

    Hartarsky, L

    I. Hartarsky, L. Lichev, and F. L. Toninelli, Local dimer dy- namics in higher dimensions, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar ´e Comb. Phys. Interact. 10.4171/AIHPD/200 (2024), published online 26 August 2024

    2024 doi

  42. [51]

    Kenyon and E

    C. Kenyon and E. R ´emila, Perfect matchings in the triangular lattice, Discrete Math.152, 191 (1996)

    1996

  43. [52]

    [2, 30, 34, 35, 37, 43, 50, 51, 53, 54, 58, 62, 63, 67–74, 80–86]

    See Supplemental Material, which includes Refs. [2, 30, 34, 35, 37, 43, 50, 51, 53, 54, 58, 62, 63, 67–74, 80–86]

  44. [53]

    C. L. Henley, Relaxation time for a dimer covering with height representation, J. Statist. Phys.89, 483 (1997)

    1997

  45. [54]

    Fradkin, D

    E. Fradkin, D. A. Huse, R. Moessner, V . Oganesyan, and S. L. Sondhi, Bipartite Rokhsar–Kivelson points and cantor decon- finement, Phys. Rev. B69, 224415 (2004)

    2004

  46. [55]

    Nash and D

    C. Nash and D. O’Connor, Dimer geometry, amoebae and a vortex dimer model, J. Phys. A50, 355002, 30 (2017)

    2017

  47. [56]

    E. W. Montroll, R. B. Potts, and J. C. Ward, Correlations and spontaneous magnetization of the two-dimensional Ising model, J. Math. Phys.4, 308 (1963)

    1963

  48. [57]

    Kenyon, Local statistics of lattice dimers, Ann

    R. Kenyon, Local statistics of lattice dimers, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´e (B) Probab. Stat.33, 591 (1997)

    1997

  49. [58]

    Fendley, R

    P. Fendley, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Classical dimers on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B66, 214513 (2002)

    2002

  50. [59]

    D. B. Wilson, Determinant algorithms for random planar struc- tures, inSODA, V ol. 97 (ACM/SIAM, 1997) pp. 258–267

    1997

  51. [60]

    H. R. Lee and B. D. Saunders, Fraction free Gaussian elimina- tion for sparse matrices, J. Symb. Comput.19, 393 (1995)

    1995

  52. [61]

    G. C. Nakos, P. R. Turner, and R. M. Williams, Fraction-free algorithms for linear and polynomial equations, ACM SIGSAM Bull.31, 11 (1997)

    1997

  53. [62]

    J. Shah, L. Shou, J. Shuler, and V . Galitski, Breakdown of the thermodynamic limit in quantum spin and dimer models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15769 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Cimasoni and N

    D. Cimasoni and N. Reshetikhin, Dimers on surface graphs and spin structures. I, Comm. Math. Phys.275, 187 (2007)

    2007

  55. [64]

    E. L. Basor and T. Ehrhardt, Asymptotics of block Toeplitz de- terminants and the classical dimer model, Comm. Math. Phys. 274, 427 (2007)

    2007

  56. [65]

    Basor and P

    E. Basor and P. Bleher, Exact solution of the classical dimer model on a triangular lattice: monomer-monomer correlations, Comm. Math. Phys.356, 397 (2017)

    2017

  57. [66]

    Senthil and M

    T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher,Z2 gauge theory of electron frac- tionalization in strongly correlated systems, Phys. Rev. B62, 7850 (2000)

    2000

  58. [67]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 110404 (2006)

    2006

  59. [68]

    Levin and X.-G

    M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 110405 (2006)

    2006

  60. [69]

    S. T. Flammia, A. Hamma, T. L. Hughes, and X.-G. Wen, Topo- logical entanglement r´enyi entropy and reduced density matrix structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 261601 (2009)

    2009

  61. [70]

    Furukawa and G

    S. Furukawa and G. Misguich, Topological entanglement en- tropy in the quantum dimer model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B75, 214407 (2007)

    2007

  62. [71]

    Papanikolaou, K

    S. Papanikolaou, K. S. Raman, and E. Fradkin, Topological phases and topological entropy of two-dimensional systems with finite correlation length, Phys. Rev. B76, 224421 (2007)

    2007

  63. [72]

    St ´ephan, G

    J.-M. St ´ephan, G. Misguich, and V . Pasquier, R´enyi entangle- ment entropies in quantum dimer models: from criticality to topological order, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2012, P02003 (2012)

    2012

  64. [73]

    Selem, C

    A. Selem, C. M. Herdman, and K. B. Whaley, Entanglement en- tropy at generalized rokhsar-kivelson points of quantum dimer models, Phys. Rev. B87, 125105 (2013)

    2013

  65. [74]

    Kenyon, Conformal invariance of loops in the double-dimer model, Comm

    R. Kenyon, Conformal invariance of loops in the double-dimer model, Comm. Math. Phys.326, 477 (2014)

    2014

  66. [75]

    Dub ´edat, Double dimers, conformal loop ensembles and isomonodromic deformations, J

    J. Dub ´edat, Double dimers, conformal loop ensembles and isomonodromic deformations, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)21, 1 (2019)

    2019

  67. [76]

    Basok and D

    M. Basok and D. Chelkak, Tau-functions `a la Dub ´edat and probabilities of cylindrical events for double-dimers and CLE(4), J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)23, 2787 (2021)

    2021

  68. [77]

    Qi, Z.-C

    Y . Qi, Z.-C. Gu, and H. Yao, Double-semion topological order from exactly solvable quantum dimer models, Phys. Rev. B92, 155105 (2015)

    2015

  69. [78]

    Buerschaper, S

    O. Buerschaper, S. C. Morampudi, and F. Pollmann, Double semion phase in an exactly solvable quantum dimer model on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B90, 195148 (2014)

    2014

  70. [79]

    Shou, dimers-weighted-triangular (2026), GitHub repository

    L. Shou, dimers-weighted-triangular (2026), GitHub repository

    2026

  71. [80]

    Cimasoni, The geometry of dimer models, Winter Braids Lect

    D. Cimasoni, The geometry of dimer models, Winter Braids Lect. Notes1, Exp. No. 2, 14 (2014)

    2014

  72. [81]

    P. W. Kasteleyn, Graph theory and crystal physics, inGraph Theory and Theoretical Physics, edited by F. Harary (Academic Press, London, 1967) pp. 43–110

    1967

  73. [82]

    Broer and F

    H. Broer and F. Takens,Dynamical systems and chaos, Applied Mathematical Sciences, V ol. 172 (Springer, New York, 2011) pp. xvi+313

    2011

  74. [83]

    V . I. Arnol’d,Geometrische Methoden in der Theorie der gew ¨ohnlichen Differentialgleichungen(Birkh ¨auser Verlag, Basel, 1987) p. 320, translated from the Russian by Ernst G¨unter Giessmann, Bernd Graw and Horst Theel

    1987

  75. [84]

    M. E. Fisher and J. Stephenson, Statistical mechanics of dimers on a plane lattice. II. dimer correlations and monomers, Phys. Rev.132, 1411 (1963)

    1963

  76. [85]

    Kenyon, Height fluctuations in the honeycomb dimer model, Comm

    R. Kenyon, Height fluctuations in the honeycomb dimer model, Comm. Math. Phys.281, 675 (2008)

    2008

  77. [86]

    Boutillier, D

    C. Boutillier, D. Cimasoni, and B. de Tili `ere, Minimal bipartite dimers and higher genus Harnack curves, Probab. Math. Phys. 4, 151 (2023)

    2023

  78. [87]

    Aguado and G

    M. Aguado and G. Vidal, Entanglement renormalization and topological order, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 070404 (2008), arxiv:0712.0348 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]. Exactly Solvable Topological Phase Transition in a Quantum Dimer Model Supplemental Material Laura Shou ,1 Jeet Shah ,1...

    2008 arXiv

  79. [88]

    Vertical path through weightαhorizontal edges (curve collapse shown in Main Text Fig. 6)

  80. [89]

    Vertical path through weight1horizontal edges

  81. [90]

    Horizontal path starting and ending in weighted faces

  82. [91]

    Horizontal path starting and ending in unweighted faces

  83. [92]

    quantum dimension

    Horizontal path starting and ending in two differently weighted faces In Fig. S7, we consider several of these additional paths and see the curve collapse also occurs forβ= 1/8andν= 1, the same as for the first case shown in the Main Text. −40 −20 0 20 40 (α − 3)N1/ν 0.00 0.25...

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.