pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.16052 · v3 · pith:DVNHG26Fnew · submitted 2026-01-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Electric-Switchable Chiral Magnons in PT-Symmetric Antiferromagnets

Jinyang Ni , Congzhe Yan , Peiyuan Cui , Zhijun Jiang , Yuanjun Jin , Guoqing Chang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 07:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords magnonsantiferromagnetic insulatorsPT symmetryelectric field controlchiral splittingspin currentsCr2CCl2
0
0 comments X

The pith

An external electric field induces giant chiral splitting of magnons in PT-symmetric antiferromagnets that host a hidden dipole.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a new class of PT-preserving antiferromagnetic insulators can have their magnon bands split chirally when an electric field is applied. This occurs because a hidden dipole coupled to the antiferromagnetic order lets the field break sublattice symmetry for the magnons without violating overall PT symmetry. Calculations on Cr2CCl2 and Cr2CBr2 show splittings reaching 20 meV at 0.2 V/Å, equivalent to a 200 T effective magnetic field. The same control also allows reversible switching of the direction of magnon spin currents. A reader would care because the approach offers electric-field manipulation of spin information in insulators without large magnetic fields or dissipative currents.

Core claim

In PT-symmetric antiferromagnetic insulators that possess a hidden dipole moment coupled to the antiferromagnetic order, an external electric field breaks the magnon sublattice symmetry while preserving overall PT symmetry. This lifts the degeneracy of the magnon bands, producing chiral splittings up to 20 meV in Cr2CCl2 and Cr2CBr2 under 0.2 V/Å fields, equivalent to an effective magnetic field of 200 T, and permits electrically reversible switching of magnon-mediated spin currents.

What carries the argument

The hidden dipole coupled to the antiferromagnetic order, which permits an electric field to break magnon sublattice symmetry while preserving PT symmetry.

If this is right

  • Magnon band splittings reach 20 meV under electric fields of 0.2 V/Å in the identified materials.
  • The splitting magnitude corresponds to an effective magnetic field of 200 T.
  • Electric control enables reversible switching of the direction of magnon-mediated spin currents.
  • Group-theoretical analysis identifies the magnetic layer groups compatible with this behavior.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same hidden-dipole mechanism could be searched for in other layered antiferromagnets that preserve PT symmetry.
  • Integration of these materials into magnonic waveguides might allow purely electric routing of spin information.
  • Inelastic neutron scattering under gate voltages could directly test the field-induced band splitting.

Load-bearing premise

The candidate materials host a hidden electric dipole that is coupled to the antiferromagnetic order in a manner allowing the field to differentiate the two magnon sublattices.

What would settle it

Measurement of zero or negligible magnon band splitting in Cr2CCl2 under an applied electric field of 0.2 V/Å would show the predicted chiral control does not occur.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.16052 by Congzhe Yan, Guoqing Chang, Jinyang Ni, Peiyuan Cui, Yuanjun Jin, Zhijun Jiang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The illustration of the magnons antiferromagnet with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a)-(b) The side and top view of of the monolayer Cr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) DFT calculated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Illustration of electric switchable spin currents medi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The magnons in antiferromagnetic insulators (AFIs) exhibit dual chirality, each carrying opposite spin angular momentum. However, in PT-symmetric AFIs, the magnon bands remain degenerate. In this work, we introduce a new class of PT-preserving AFIs in which the giant chiral splitting of magnons can be induced and controlled by an external electric field. Unlike conventional cases, such AFIs host a hidden dipole coupled to the antiferromagnetic order, which allows an external electric field to break the magnon sublattice symmetry and thereby largely lift the band degeneracy. Group theoretical analysis identifies the possible magnetic layer groups, while first-principles calculations and spin-wave theory reveal band splittings up to 20meV in Cr2CCl2 and Cr2CBr2 under the electric field of 0.2 V/{\AA}, corresponding to an effective magnetic field of 200T. In addition, the electrically controlled magnon chiral splitting enables reversible switching of magnon-mediated spin currents. These findings open a new route toward nonvolatile spintronics based on magnons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a class of PT-symmetric antiferromagnetic insulators (AFIs) possessing a hidden electric dipole locked to the antiferromagnetic order. Group-theoretical analysis identifies compatible magnetic layer groups; first-principles DFT and spin-wave calculations then show that an external electric field of 0.2 V/Å lifts the magnon degeneracy, producing chiral band splittings up to 20 meV (equivalent to an effective field of ~200 T) in Cr₂CCl₂ and Cr₂CBr₂. The electrically tunable splitting is further shown to enable reversible switching of magnon-mediated spin currents.

Significance. If the symmetry-allowed hidden-dipole mechanism and the reported splittings hold, the result would provide a concrete route to all-electric control of magnon chirality in PT-symmetric systems, with potential implications for magnon spintronics and nonvolatile devices. The combination of symmetry classification with explicit first-principles plus spin-wave verification constitutes a strength; the magnitude of the predicted splitting is noteworthy if the effective-field conversion is robust.

major comments (2)
  1. [group-theoretical analysis] The central mechanism rests on the existence of a PT-even but sublattice-odd dipole-Néel coupling that permits an external E-field to split magnon bands without violating overall PT symmetry. The group-theoretical section must explicitly list the allowed magnetic layer groups and the form of the invariant that couples the hidden dipole to the Néel vector; without this, it is impossible to confirm that the reported 20 meV splitting is symmetry-permitted rather than an artifact of the DFT electric-field implementation.
  2. [results / abstract] Abstract and results section: the conversion of the 20 meV magnon splitting into an “effective magnetic field of 200 T” is load-bearing for the claim of giant tunability. The manuscript must state the precise formula (including the magnon g-factor or spin stiffness used) and show that the same conversion applied to a conventional Zeeman term reproduces known benchmarks; otherwise the 200 T figure cannot be compared with literature values.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract / introduction] Notation for the hidden dipole moment should be defined once in the main text (e.g., as P_hidden or D) and used consistently; the abstract introduces the concept without a symbol.
  2. [figures] Figure captions for the spin-wave dispersion plots should include the electric-field direction relative to the layer normal and the k-path used, to allow direct comparison with the symmetry analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the work's significance and for the detailed, constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in a revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central mechanism rests on the existence of a PT-even but sublattice-odd dipole-Néel coupling that permits an external E-field to split magnon bands without violating overall PT symmetry. The group-theoretical section must explicitly list the allowed magnetic layer groups and the form of the invariant that couples the hidden dipole to the Néel vector; without this, it is impossible to confirm that the reported 20 meV splitting is symmetry-permitted rather than an artifact of the DFT electric-field implementation.

    Authors: We agree that greater explicitness in the group-theoretical analysis will strengthen the manuscript. Although the original text states that the analysis identifies the compatible magnetic layer groups, we will revise the section to include an explicit enumeration (or table) of the allowed groups together with the derived form of the PT-even, sublattice-odd dipole-Néel invariant. This will directly demonstrate that the electric-field-induced magnon splitting is symmetry-permitted. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Abstract and results section: the conversion of the 20 meV magnon splitting into an “effective magnetic field of 200 T” is load-bearing for the claim of giant tunability. The manuscript must state the precise formula (including the magnon g-factor or spin stiffness used) and show that the same conversion applied to a conventional Zeeman term reproduces known benchmarks; otherwise the 200 T figure cannot be compared with literature values.

    Authors: We accept that the effective-field conversion requires a precise statement and validation. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly give the conversion formula (ΔE = g μ_B B_eff, with g obtained from the calculated spin stiffness) and apply the identical procedure to a conventional Zeeman term in a reference antiferromagnet, confirming that the resulting B_eff matches established literature values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on independent group theory and first-principles calculations

full rationale

The paper presents its mechanism via group-theoretical analysis of magnetic layer groups that permit a hidden dipole coupled to AF order, followed by first-principles DFT and spin-wave theory computations on Cr2CCl2/Cr2CBr2. No quoted step defines a quantity in terms of itself, renames a fitted parameter as a prediction, or reduces the central splitting result to a self-citation chain or imported ansatz. The reported 20 meV splitting under 0.2 V/Å is presented as an output of those external methods rather than an input by construction. This is the normal non-circular case.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claim rests on the existence of a hidden dipole whose coupling to AFM order is postulated from symmetry and then used to predict the splitting; no independent experimental confirmation is supplied in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption PT symmetry remains preserved while the electric field breaks magnon sublattice symmetry
    Stated directly in the abstract as the defining property of the new class.
  • standard math Group-theoretical classification correctly identifies the magnetic layer groups that permit the hidden dipole
    Abstract states that group theoretical analysis identifies the possible groups.
invented entities (1)
  • hidden dipole no independent evidence
    purpose: Coupled to antiferromagnetic order so that an external electric field can break magnon sublattice symmetry
    Introduced in the abstract as the key enabling feature of the new material class.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5740 in / 1539 out tokens · 30686 ms · 2026-05-25T07:32:50.812448+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A. V. Chumak, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon transistor for all-magnon data processing, Nat. Commun. 5, 4700 (2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys.11, 453 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [4]

    S. D. Bader and S. S. P. Parkin, Spintronics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.1, 71 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [5]

    Pirro, V

    P. Pirro, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hille- brands, Advances in coherent magnonics, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 1114 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [6]

    P. A. McClarty, Topological magnons: A review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.13, 171 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [7]

    B. Lenk, H. Ulrichs, F. Garbs, and M. M¨ unzenberg, The building blocks of magnonics, Phys. Rep.507, 107 6 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [8]

    X. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Liu, Y. Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear mag- nets dictated by spin space groups, Nature640, 349 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [9]

    Chen, J.-H

    L. Chen, J.-H. Chung, B. Gao, T. Chen, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, Q. Huang, and P. Dai, Topological spin excitations in honeycomb ferromagnet CrI 3, Phys. Rev. X8, 041028 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [10]

    A. Mook, K. Plekhanov, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Interaction-stabilized topological magnon insulator in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. X11, 021061 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [11]

    Y.-P. Wang, J. W. Rao, Y. Yang, P.-C. Xu, Y. S. Gui, B. M. Yao, J. Q. You, and C.-M. Hu, Nonreciprocity and unidirectional invisibility in cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 127202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [12]

    Onose, T

    Y. Onose, T. Ideue, H. Katsura, Y. Shiomi, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Observation of the magnon Hall effect, Science329, 297 (2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [13]

    Zhang, Y

    X.-T. Zhang, Y. H. Gao, and G. Chen, Phys. Rep.1070, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [14]

    Cheng, S

    R. Cheng, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Spin Nernst effect of magnons in collinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217202 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [15]

    V. A. Zyuzin and A. A. Kovalev, Magnon spin Nernst effect in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 217203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [16]

    S. Qi, D. Chen, K. Chen, J. Liu, G. Chen, B. Luo, H. Cui, L. Jia, J. Li, M. Huang,et al., Giant electrically tunable magnon transport anisotropy in a van der Waals antifer- romagnetic insulator, Nat. Commun.14, 2526 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [17]

    C. Liu, Y. Luo, D. Hong, S. S.-L. Zhang, H. Saglam, Y. Li, Y. Lin, B. Fisher, J. E. Pearson, J. S. Jiang, and et al., Electric field control of magnon spin currents in an antiferromagnetic insulator, Sci. Adv.7, 1669 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [18]

    A. M. Kuzmenko, D. Szaller, T. Kain, V. Dziom, L. Wey- mann, A. Shuvaev, A. Pimenov, A. A. Mukhin, V. Y. Ivanov, I. A. Gudim, L. N. Bezmaternykh, and A. Pi- menov, Switching of magnons by electric and magnetic fields in multiferroic borates, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 027203 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [19]

    X. Wan, Q. Du, J. Lu, Z. Zhang, J. Ni, L. Zhang, Z. Jiang, and L. Bellaiche, Topological switching in bi- layer magnons via electrical control, Phys. Rev. B112, L100404 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [20]

    R¨ uckriegel, A

    A. R¨ uckriegel, A. Brataas, and R. A. Duine, Bulk and edge spin transport in topological magnon insulators, Phys. Rev. B97, 081106 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [21]

    Parsonnet, L

    E. Parsonnet, L. Caretta, V. Nagarajan, H. Zhang, H. Taghinejad, P. Behera, X. Huang, P. Kavle, A. Fer- nandez, D. Nikonov, and et al., Nonvolatile electric field control of thermal magnons in the absence of an applied magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 087601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [22]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [23]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol.11, 231 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [24]

    S. M. Rezende, A. Azevedo, and R. L. Rodr´ ıguez-Su´ arez, Introduction to antiferromagnetic magnons, J. Appl. Phys.126(2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [25]

    Gomonay, V

    O. Gomonay, V. Baltz, A. Brataas, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spin textures and dynamics, Nat. Phys.14, 213 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [26]

    R. R. Neumann, A. Mook, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Ther- mal Hall effect of magnons in collinear antiferromagnetic insulators: Signatures of magnetic and topological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 117201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [27]

    Gitgeatpong, Y

    G. Gitgeatpong, Y. Zhao, P. Piyawongwatthana, Y. Qiu, L. W. Harriger, N. P. Butch, T. Sato, and K. Matan, Non- reciprocal magnons and symmetry-breaking in the non- centrosymmetric antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 047201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [28]

    T. J. Sato and K. Matan, Nonreciprocal magnons in non- centrosymmetric magnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 081007 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [29]

    Matsumoto and S

    T. Matsumoto and S. Hayami, Nonreciprocal magnons due to symmetric anisotropic exchange interaction in honeycomb antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B101, 224419 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [30]

    Hayami and T

    S. Hayami and T. Matsumoto, Essential model param- eters for nonreciprocal magnons in multisublattice sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B105, 014404 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [31]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [32]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [33]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [34]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [35]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representa- tion theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [36]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X14, 031039 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [37]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin- orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 021016 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [38]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O. ˇSipr, J. Sinova,et al., Chiral magnons in al- termagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 256703 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [39]

    K. Wu, J. Dong, M. Zhu, F. Zheng, and J. Zhang, Magnon splitting and magnon spin transport in alter- magnets, Chin. Phys. Lett. (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [40]

    Zhang, X.-S

    Y.-F. Zhang, X.-S. Ni, K. Chen, and K. Cao, Chiral magnon splitting in altermagnetic CrSb from first prin- ciples, Phys. Rev. B111, 174451 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [41]

    Alaei, P

    M. Alaei, P. Sobieszczyk, A. Ptok, N. Rezaei, A. R. Oganov, and A. Qaiumzadeh, Origin of a-type antifer- romagnetism and chiral split magnons in altermagnetic α-MnTe, Phys. Rev. B111, 104416 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [42]

    Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Masuda, Chiral split magnon in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 156702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [43]

    V. C. Morano, Z. Maesen, S. E. Nikitin, J. Lass, D. G. Mazzone, and O. Zaharko, Absence of altermagnetic magnon band splitting in MnF 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 7 226702 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [44]

    Q. Sun, J. Guo, D. Wang, D. L. Abernathy, W. Tian, and C. Li, Observation of chiral magnon band splitting in altermagnetic hematite, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 186703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [45]

    A. K. Singh, N. Heinsdorf, A. A. Mancilla, J. Bannies, A. Maity, A. I. Kolesnikov, M. Matsuda, M. B. Stone, M. Franz, J. Gaudet, and A. M. Hallas, Chiral spin- split magnons in the metallic altermagnet CrSb (2025), arXiv:2511.16086

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [46]

    which includes I

    See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/... which includes I. Additional details of DFT calculations; II. magnon transport theory; III. the finite temperature behavior of magnons; and IV. the symmetry analysis

    work page

  46. [47]

    Fiebig, Revival of the magnetoelectric effect, J

    M. Fiebig, Revival of the magnetoelectric effect, J. Phys. D38, R123 (2005)

    work page 2005

  47. [48]

    J. Ni, Z. Zhang, J. Lu, Q. Du, Z. Jiang, and L. Bel- laiche, Nonvolatile magnonics in bilayer magnetic insula- tors, Nano Lett.25, 1207 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [49]

    Y. H. Shen, Y. Liu, and M. Luo, Electrical reversal of the magnon thermal Hall coefficient in a van der Waals bi- layer antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B110, 045423 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [50]

    H. J. Zhao, X. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Yang, L. Bellaiche, and Y. Ma, Zeeman effect in centrosymmetric antiferromag- netic semiconductors controlled by an electric field, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 187602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [51]

    L. Tao, Q. Zhang, H. Li, H. J. Zhao, X. Wang, B. Song, E. Y. Tsymbal, and L. Bellaiche, Layer Hall detection of the N´ eel vector in centrosymmetric magnetoelectric antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 096803 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [52]

    L. Yu, H. J. Zhao, L. Bellaiche, and Y. Ma, Electri- cally switchable nonrelativistic zeeman spin splittings in collinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 256704 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [53]

    J. Ni, Y. Jin, Q. Du, and G. Chang, Magnon nonlinear Hall effect in two-dimensional antiferromagnetic insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B112, 054424 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [54]

    Q. Du, Z. Zhang, J. Ni, Z. Jiang, and L. Bellaiche, Non- reciprocal magnons in layered antiferromagnets VPX 3 (X = S, Se, Te), Phys. Rev. B112, L100408 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [55]

    Xiang, E

    H. Xiang, E. Kan, S.-H. Wei, M.-H. Whangbo, and X. Gong, Predicting the spin-lattice order of frustrated systems from first principles, Phys. Rev. B84, 224429 (2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [56]

    Xiang, C

    H. Xiang, C. Lee, H.-J. Koo, X. Gong, and M.- H. Whangbo, Magnetic properties and energy-mapping analysis, Dalton Trans.42, 823 (2013)

    work page 2013

  56. [57]

    J. Ni, X. Li, D. Amoroso, X. He, J. Feng, E. Kan, S. Pi- cozzi, and H. Xiang, Giant biquadratic exchange in 2d magnets and its role in stabilizing ferromagnetism of NiCl2 monolayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 247204 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [58]

    S. Chen, Z. Jian, and Z. Sun, Half-metallic ferro- magnetism and surface functionalization-induced metal- insulator transition in graphene-like two-dimensional Cr2C crystals, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces7, 17510 (2015)

    work page 2015

  58. [59]

    Limbu, H

    Y. Limbu, H. Paudyal, E. G. da Silva, D. R. Candido, M. E. Flatt´ e, and D. Paudyal, Magnetic semiconductors from functionalized Cr 2C MXenes, Phys. Rev. B112, 214445 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [60]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev.58, 1098 (1940)

    work page 1940

  60. [61]

    N. N. Bogoljubov, V. V. Tolmachov, and D. ˇSirkov, A new method in the theory of superconductivity, Fortschr. Phys.6, 605 (1958)

    work page 1958

  61. [62]

    Valatin, Comments on the theory of superconductivity, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)7, 843 (1958)

    J. Valatin, Comments on the theory of superconductivity, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)7, 843 (1958)

    work page 1955

  62. [63]

    Sourounis and A

    K. Sourounis and A. Manchon, Impact of magnon in- teractions on transport in honeycomb antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 054429 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [64]

    Winkler,Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003)

    R. Winkler,Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003)

    work page 2003

  64. [65]

    Q. Cui, B. Zeng, P. Cui, T. Yu, and H. Yang, Efficient spin Seebeck and spin Nernst effects of magnons in alter- magnets, Phys. Rev. B108, L180401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [66]

    Poelchen, J

    G. Poelchen, J. Hellwig, M. Peters, D. Y. Usachov, K. Kliemt, C. Laubschat, P. M. Echenique, E. V. Chulkov, C. Krellner, S. Parkin,et al., Long-lived spin waves in a metallic antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun.14, 5422 (2023)

    work page 2023