arxiv: 2602.01328 · v3 · submitted 2026-02-01 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

On anomaly free 4d mathcal{N}=4 and 6d (2,0) conformal supergravities and UV finiteness of Poincar\'e supergravities

Renata Kallosh , Arkady A. Tseytlin

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 08:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords conformal supergravityPoincaré supergravitysuperconformal anomaliesUV divergences4d N=46d (2,0)scattering amplitudes

0 comments

The pith

Anomaly cancellation in conformal supergravities implies that divergences in the related Poincaré supergravities scale with n_v + 2 in 4d and n_T - 21 in 6d.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews superconformal anomalies in 4d N=4 conformal supergravity coupled to N_v vector multiplets and in 6d (2,0) conformal supergravity coupled to N_T tensor multiplets. Anomalies cancel precisely when N_v equals 4 and N_T equals 26. Dropping the conformal supergravity action and shifting the multiplet counts produces a classical equivalence to the Poincaré supergravity theories with n_v vectors and n_T tensors. This equivalence maps the anomaly cancellation conditions directly onto statements about the coefficients of divergences in the Poincaré theories. The resulting predictions for the divergence structure match existing results from explicit scattering amplitude calculations.

Core claim

The authors establish that the anomaly-free conditions in 4d N=4 conformal supergravity at N_v=4 and 6d (2,0) conformal supergravity at N_T=26, when the conformal action is dropped and the multiplet numbers are shifted to N_v=6+n_v and N_T=5+n_T, yield classical equivalences to the corresponding Poincaré supergravities, so that the divergences in the 4d Poincaré theory are proportional to n_v+2 and those in the 6d Poincaré theory are proportional to n_T-21.

What carries the argument

The classical equivalence obtained by dropping the conformal supergravity part of the action and adjusting the multiplet count, which transfers the anomaly cancellation condition into a statement about the coefficient of divergences in the Poincaré supergravity.

If this is right

Divergences in 4d N=4 Poincaré supergravity with n_v vector multiplets are proportional to n_v + 2.
Divergences in 6d (2,0) Poincaré supergravity with n_T tensor multiplets are proportional to n_T - 21.
These proportionality relations are consistent with known results from scattering amplitude computations in the theories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The mapping suggests that complete cancellation of divergences would require non-physical values such as n_v = -2 in 4d or n_T = 21 in 6d.
The same logic of relating conformal anomalies to Poincaré divergence coefficients could be tested in other dimensions or with different numbers of supersymmetries.
The result underscores how classical equivalences between conformal and Poincaré formulations can constrain quantum ultraviolet behavior without performing full loop calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The classical equivalence obtained by dropping the conformal supergravity part of the action and adjusting the multiplet count directly transfers the anomaly cancellation condition into a statement about the coefficient of divergences in the Poincaré supergravity.

What would settle it

An explicit one-loop calculation of the divergence coefficient in 4d N=4 Poincaré supergravity with a fixed value of n_v, such as n_v=0, to test whether the coefficient is exactly 2.

read the original abstract

We review the structure of superconformal anomalies in 4d $\mathcal N$=4 conformal supergravity (CSG) coupled to a number N$_\rm v$ of $ \mathcal N$=4 vector multiplets and 6d (2,0) CSG coupled to N$_{_{\rm T}}$ of (2,0) tensor multiplets. Anomalies cancel if N$_\rm v$=4 and N$_{_{\rm T}}$=26 respectively. If the CSG part of the action is dropped and N$_{\rm v}$=6+ n$_{\rm v}$, the first theory is classically equivalent to the 4d $\mathcal N$=4 Poincar\'e supergravity (PSG) coupled to n$_{\rm v}$ vector multiplets, while the second one with N$_{_{\rm T}}$=5+ n$_{_{\rm T}}$ is classically equivalent to the 6d (2,0) PSG coupled to n$_{\rm T}$ tensor multiplets. We argue that these facts imply that divergences in the 4d PSG with n$_{\rm v}$ vectors should be proportional to n$_{\rm v}$+2 and similarly in the 6d PSG with n$_{_{\rm T}}$ tensors to n$_{_{\rm T}}$-21. These predictions appear to be consistent with known results of explicit scattering amplitude computations in these 4d and 6d PSG theories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper connects anomaly cancellation numbers in conformal supergravities to specific proportionality factors for divergences in the Poincaré versions through a classical reduction, and checks consistency with amplitude results.

read the letter

The main point is that anomaly cancellation at N_v=4 for 4d N=4 conformal supergravity and at N_T=26 for 6d (2,0) conformal supergravity, when combined with dropping the conformal action and shifting the multiplet counts, is said to force the UV divergences in the corresponding Poincaré theories to scale as n_v+2 and n_T-21. This matches some existing amplitude computations, which the paper treats as supporting evidence. The review of the anomaly cancellation conditions is clear and the numbers line up neatly with the classical equivalence described. That part organizes known facts in a compact way without introducing new calculations. The consistency check against amplitude results is a reasonable cross-check and gives the claim some external grounding. The softer part is the direct transfer from the anomaly coefficients to the exact prefactors of the divergences. The equivalence is only classical, so it is not automatic that the one-loop or higher divergent terms in the effective action follow the same linear dependence after the higher-derivative terms are removed. The paper presents this as an implication rather than deriving the divergent part step by step from the anomaly, which leaves room for additional contributions from the reduction itself. Readers already working on UV finiteness in supergravity or on amplitude methods in these specific theories would get the most out of it as a short organizing note. It is worth sending for peer review because the claim is testable against the amplitude literature and the anomaly review is solid enough to merit a closer look by referees familiar with the subfield.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews superconformal anomalies in 4d N=4 conformal supergravity (CSG) coupled to N_v vector multiplets and 6d (2,0) CSG coupled to N_T tensor multiplets. Anomalies cancel at N_v=4 and N_T=26. Dropping the CSG action and shifting to N_v=6+n_v (respectively N_T=5+n_T) yields classical equivalence to 4d N=4 Poincaré supergravity (PSG) with n_v vectors and 6d (2,0) PSG with n_T tensors. The paper argues that these facts imply UV divergences in the 4d PSG are proportional to n_v+2 and in the 6d PSG to n_T-21, consistent with known amplitude computations.

Significance. If the implication holds, the work supplies a compact heuristic connecting anomaly cancellation in conformal theories to the structure of divergences in their Poincaré counterparts, potentially explaining multiplet-count dependence of UV behavior without performing new loop calculations. It builds directly on established anomaly results and existing amplitude data, offering a possible shortcut for assessing finiteness in extended supergravities.

major comments (2)

[main argument (following anomaly review)] The central implication—that anomaly cancellation at N_v=4 (N_T=26) directly fixes the divergence prefactor in the PSG theories via the stated classical reduction—is presented without an explicit mapping or derivation. The manuscript states that the anomaly coefficient (linear in multiplet number) supplies the divergent coefficient after dropping CSG terms, but provides no intermediate steps showing how the one-loop anomaly polynomial survives the removal of higher-derivative operators or the shift in conformal properties. This step is load-bearing for the main claim.
[paragraph containing the proportionality statements] The offsets +2 and -21 are obtained by subtracting the anomaly-free values (4 and 26) from the classical-equivalence starting points (6 and 5). While numerically consistent with the abstract, the manuscript does not demonstrate that these specific linear combinations are the only possible contributions to the divergence coefficient once the CSG sector is excised; additional finite or divergent terms generated by the reduction itself are not ruled out.

minor comments (1)

Notation for the shifted multiplet counts (N_v = 6 + n_v, N_T = 5 + n_T) is introduced without a dedicated equation or table; a short display equation would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications on our reasoning and indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central implication—that anomaly cancellation at N_v=4 (N_T=26) directly fixes the divergence prefactor in the PSG theories via the stated classical reduction—is presented without an explicit mapping or derivation. The manuscript states that the anomaly coefficient (linear in multiplet number) supplies the divergent coefficient after dropping CSG terms, but provides no intermediate steps showing how the one-loop anomaly polynomial survives the removal of higher-derivative operators or the shift in conformal properties. This step is load-bearing for the main claim.

Authors: We agree that the connection is presented heuristically and would benefit from more explicit steps. The anomaly polynomial is computed from the field content in the conformal theory. Dropping the CSG action removes higher-derivative terms but leaves the spectrum unchanged, so the one-loop anomaly coefficient—linear in multiplet number—directly determines the divergence structure in the equivalent Poincaré theory. In the revised manuscript we will add a short explanatory paragraph outlining this preservation of the anomaly under the classical reduction, emphasizing that no new operators or quantum corrections are introduced by excising the CSG sector. revision: yes
Referee: The offsets +2 and -21 are obtained by subtracting the anomaly-free values (4 and 26) from the classical-equivalence starting points (6 and 5). While numerically consistent with the abstract, the manuscript does not demonstrate that these specific linear combinations are the only possible contributions to the divergence coefficient once the CSG sector is excised; additional finite or divergent terms generated by the reduction itself are not ruled out.

Authors: The offsets follow uniquely from the linearity of the anomaly coefficient. For 4d, classical equivalence begins at N_v=6 while cancellation occurs at N_v=4, so the net coefficient is N_v-4 = n_v+2. For 6d the analogous difference is N_T-26 = n_T-21. Because the reduction is purely classical and the anomaly depends only on the spectrum, no additional divergent contributions arise from removing the CSG terms. This is corroborated by existing amplitude results. We will revise the relevant paragraph to state explicitly that linearity and the classical nature of the mapping preclude other contributions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Divergence proportionality in PSG is remapped anomaly cancellation from CSG via classical equivalence offsets

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
"We argue that these facts imply that divergences in the 4d PSG with n_v vectors should be proportional to n_v+2 and similarly in the 6d PSG with n_T tensors to n_T-21."

The facts are anomaly cancellation at N_v=4 (N_T=26) plus the equivalence maps N_v=6+n_v (N_T=5+n_T). Substituting yields the stated proportionality by algebra: anomaly coefficient ~ (N_v-4) = n_v+2. The PSG divergence coefficient is therefore the CSG anomaly coefficient rewritten in PSG variables, with no additional quantum derivation supplied.

full rationale

The paper states anomaly cancellation at N_v=4 and N_T=26 in CSG, then defines classical equivalence by setting N_v=6+n_v and N_T=5+n_T to match PSG. The claimed implication that PSG divergences are proportional to n_v+2 and n_T-21 follows immediately from linear substitution into the cancellation condition (N_v-4 becomes n_v+2). This reduces the 'prediction' to a coordinate shift of the input cancellation values under the assumption that the anomaly coefficient directly supplies the divergence prefactor. No independent one-loop computation in PSG is performed; the result is forced by the mapping and linearity. The paper notes consistency with existing amplitude results but does not derive the coefficient anew. This qualifies as partial circularity per the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions of superconformal symmetry, anomaly cancellation for given multiplet counts, and classical equivalence between CSG and PSG formulations.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Anomaly cancellation occurs precisely at N_v=4 for 4d N=4 CSG and N_T=26 for 6d (2,0) CSG
Invoked as the starting point for the review of anomaly structure.
domain assumption Dropping the CSG action yields classical equivalence to PSG with adjusted multiplet numbers
Used to transfer the anomaly condition to the PSG divergence statement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5587 in / 1257 out tokens · 50122 ms · 2026-05-16T08:34:01.340044+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

If the CSG part of the action is dropped and Nv=6+nv, the first theory is classically equivalent to the 4d N=4 PSG... anomalies... should be controlled by the same coefficient... Nv-4=nv+2
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the (2,0) PSG with nT=21 tensor multiplets should be finite... divergences... scale as nT-21

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · 46 internal anchors

[1]

Huang, H

Y.-t. Huang, H. Johansson, M. Santagata and C. Wen,Surprising one-loop finiteness of 6D half-maximal supergravities,2510.24558

work page arXiv
[2]

P. K. Townsend,A New Anomaly Free Chiral Supergravity Theory From Compactification on K3, Phys. Lett. B139(1984) 283

work page 1984
[3]

Five-branes And $M$-Theory On An Orbifold

E. Witten,Five-branes and M-theory on an orbifold,Nucl. Phys. B463(1996) 383 [hep-th/9512219]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[4]

(2,0) Tensor Multiplets and Conformal Supergravity in D=6

E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin and A. Van Proeyen,(2,0) tensor multiplets and conformal supergravity in D = 6,Class. Quant. Grav.16(1999) 3193 [hep-th/9904085]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[5]

Bergshoeff, E

E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin and A. Van Proeyen,Superconformal Tensor Calculus and Matter Couplings in Six-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B264(1986) 653

work page 1986
[6]

Anomaly cancellation and one-loop finiteness of 6D half-maximal supergravities

R. Kallosh,Anomaly cancellation and one-loop finiteness of 6D half-maximal supergravities, 2512.05082

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[7]

Conformal a-anomaly of some non-unitary 6d superconformal theories

M. Beccaria and A. A. Tseytlin,Conformal a-anomaly of some non-unitary 6d superconformal theories,JHEP09(2015) 017 [1506.08727]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[8]

Conformal anomaly c-coefficients of superconformal 6d theories

M. Beccaria and A. A. Tseytlin,Conformal anomaly c-coefficients of superconformal 6d theories, JHEP01(2016) 001 [1510.02685]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[9]

$C_T$ for conformal higher spin fields from partition function on conically deformed sphere

M. Beccaria and A. A. Tseytlin,C T for conformal higher spin fields from partition function on conically deformed sphere,JHEP09(2017) 123 [1707.02456]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[10]

de Roo,Matter Coupling in N=4 Supergravity,Nucl

M. de Roo,Matter Coupling in N=4 Supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B255(1985) 515

work page 1985
[11]

E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin,Conformal Anomaly in Weyl Theory and Anomaly Free Superconformal Theories,Phys. Lett. B134(1984) 187

work page 1984
[12]

E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin,Instanton Zero Modes and Beta Functions in Supergravities. 2. Conformal Supergravity,Phys. Lett. B134(1984) 307

work page 1984
[13]

E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin,Conformal Supergravity,Phys. Rept.119(1985) 233. – 15 –

work page 1985
[14]

Romer and P

H. Romer and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Axial Anomalies in N=4 Conformal Supergravity,Phys. Lett. B162(1985) 290

work page 1985
[15]

J. J. M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh, R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin,On the U(1) duality anomaly and the S-matrix of N=4 supergravity,JHEP07(2013) 029 [1303.6219]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[16]

Fischler,Finiteness Calculations for O(4) through O(8) Extended Supergravity and O(4) Supergravity Coupled to Selfdual O(4) Matter,Phys

M. Fischler,Finiteness Calculations for O(4) through O(8) Extended Supergravity and O(4) Supergravity Coupled to Selfdual O(4) Matter,Phys. Rev. D20(1979) 396

work page 1979
[17]

Z. Bern, S. Davies and T. Dennen,The Ultraviolet Structure of Half-Maximal Supergravity with Matter Multiplets at Two and Three Loops,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 065007 [1305.4876]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[18]

Z. Bern, S. Davies, T. Dennen, A. V. Smirnov and V. A. Smirnov,Ultraviolet Properties of N=4 Supergravity at Four Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 231302 [1309.2498]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[19]

M. Kaku, P. K. Townsend and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Properties of Conformal Supergravity,Phys. Rev. D17(1978) 3179

work page 1978
[20]

Bergshoeff, M

E. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo and B. de Wit,Extended Conformal Supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B182 (1981) 173

work page 1981
[21]

E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin,One Loop Beta Function in Conformal Supergravities,Nucl. Phys. B203(1982) 157

work page 1982
[22]

E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin,Asymptotic Freedom in Extended Conformal Supergravities, Phys. Lett. B110(1982) 117

work page 1982
[23]

de Roo,Gauged N=4 Matter Couplings,Phys

M. de Roo,Gauged N=4 Matter Couplings,Phys. Lett. B156(1985) 331

work page 1985
[24]

D=4 Super Yang Mills, D=5 gauged supergravity and D=4 conformal supergravity

H. Liu and A. A. Tseytlin,D = 4 Super Yang-Mills, D = 5 Gauged Supergravity, and D = 4 Conformal Supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B533(1998) 88 [hep-th/9804083]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[25]

I. L. Buchbinder, N. G. Pletnev and A. A. Tseytlin,“Induced” N=4 conformal supergravity,Phys. Lett. B717(2012) 274 [1209.0416]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[26]

Towards the full N=4 conformal supergravity action

F. Ciceri and B. Sahoo,Towards the Full N=4 Conformal Supergravity Action,JHEP1601 (2016) 059 [1510.04999]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[27]

Construction of all N=4 conformal supergravities

D. Butter, F. Ciceri, B. de Wit and B. Sahoo,All N=4 Conformal Supergravities,Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(2017) 081602 [1609.09083]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[28]

Butter, F

D. Butter, F. Ciceri and B. Sahoo, N = 4conformal supergravity: the complete actions,JHEP01 (2020) 029 [1910.11874]

work page arXiv 2020
[29]

A. A. Tseytlin,On divergences in non-minimalN= 4conformal supergravity,J. Phys. A50 (2017) 48LT01 [1708.08727]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[30]

Higher spins in AdS_5 at one loop: vacuum energy, boundary conformal anomalies and AdS/CFT

M. Beccaria and A. A. Tseytlin,Higher Spins in AdS5 at One Loop: Vacuum Energy, Boundary Conformal Anomalies and AdS/CFT,JHEP1411(2014) 114 [1410.3273]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[31]

Novel supermultiplets of SU(2,2|4) and the AdS_5/CFT_4 duality

M. Gunaydin, D. Minic and M. Zagermann,Novel Supermultiplets ofSU(2,2|4)and the AdS(5)/CFT(4) Duality,Nucl. Phys. B544(1999) 737 [hep-th/9810226]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[32]

Deser,Scale invariance and gravitational coupling,Annals Phys.59(1970) 248

S. Deser,Scale invariance and gravitational coupling,Annals Phys.59(1970) 248

work page 1970
[33]

D. Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen,Supergravity. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012

work page 2012
[34]

Kallosh,On the renormalization problem of quantum gravity,Phys

R. Kallosh,On the renormalization problem of quantum gravity,Phys. Lett. B55(1975) 321. – 16 –

work page 1975
[35]

Deser, M

S. Deser, M. T. Grisaru, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and C. C. Wu,Scale Dependence and the Renormalization Problem of Quantum Gravity,Phys. Lett. B58(1975) 355

work page 1975
[36]

Conjecture on Hidden Superconformal Symmetry of N=4 Supergravity

S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh and A. Van Proeyen,Conjecture on Hidden Superconformal Symmetry of N=4 Supergravity,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 025004 [1209.0418]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[37]

Scattering amplitudes in super-renormalizable gravity

P. Don` a, S. Giaccari, L. Modesto, L. Rachwal and Y. Zhu,Scattering amplitudes in super-renormalizable gravity,JHEP08(2015) 038 [1506.04589]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[38]

On triviality of S-matrix in conformal higher spin theory

M. Beccaria, S. Nakach and A. A. Tseytlin,On triviality of S-matrix in conformal higher spin theory,JHEP09(2016) 034 [1607.06379]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[39]

Einstein Gravity from Conformal Gravity

J. Maldacena,Einstein Gravity from Conformal Gravity,1105.5632

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[40]

On the renormalized volumes for conformally compact Einstein manifolds

A. Chang, J. Qing and P. Yang,On the renormalized volumes for conformally compact einstein manifolds, math/0512376, 2005

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[41]

E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin,One Loop Infinities in Dimensionally Reduced Supergravities, Phys. Lett. B137(1984) 357

work page 1984
[42]

’t Hooft and M

G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,One-loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A20(1974) 69

work page 1974
[43]

Deser and P

S. Deser and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,One Loop Divergences of Quantized Einstein-Maxwell Fields, Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 401

work page 1974
[44]

J. J. M. Carrasco, M. Chiodaroli, M. G¨ unaydin and R. Roiban,One-loop four-point amplitudes in pure and matter-coupled N<= 4 supergravity,JHEP03(2013) 056 [1212.1146]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[45]

Bergshoeff, A

E. Bergshoeff, A. Salam and E. Sezgin,Supersymmetric R 2 Actions, Conformal Invariance and Lorentz Chern-simons Term in Six-dimensions and Ten-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B279(1987) 659

work page 1987
[46]

Kennedy and G

C. Kennedy and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Six-dimensionalN= (2, 0) conformal superspace, JHEP08(2025) 215 [2506.01630]

work page arXiv 2025
[47]

Tensor Multiplets in Six-Dimensional (2,0) Supergravity

F. Riccioni,Tensor multiplets in six-dimensional (2,0) supergravity,Phys. Lett. B422(1998) 126 [hep-th/9712176]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[48]

An action for the (2,0) self-dual tensor multiplet in a conformal supergravity background

K. Van Hoof,An Action for the (2,0) selfdual tensor multiplet in a conformal supergravity background,Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 2093 [hep-th/9910175]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[49]

Invariants for minimal conformal supergravity in six dimensions

D. Butter, S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak and S. Theisen,Invariants for minimal conformal supergravity in six dimensions,JHEP12(2016) 072 [1606.02921]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[50]

The component structure of conformal supergravity invariants in six dimensions

D. Butter, J. Novak and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,The component structure of conformal supergravity invariants in six dimensions,JHEP05(2017) 133 [1701.08163]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[51]

Curvature squared invariants in six-dimensional ${\cal N} = (1,0)$ supergravity

D. Butter, J. Novak, M. Ozkan, Y. Pang and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Curvature squared invariants in six-dimensionalN= (1,0)supergravity,JHEP04(2019) 013 [1808.00459]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[52]

Casarin, C

L. Casarin, C. Kennedy and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Conformal anomalies for (maximal) 6d conformal supergravity,JHEP10(2024) 227 [2403.07509]

work page arXiv 2024
[53]

Bonora, P

L. Bonora, P. Pasti and M. Bregola,Weyl cocycles,Class. Quant. Grav.3(1986) 635

work page 1986
[54]

Geometric Classification of Conformal Anomalies in Arbitrary Dimensions

S. Deser and A. Schwimmer,Geometric classification of conformal anomalies in arbitrary dimensions,Phys. Lett. B309(1993) 279 [hep-th/9302047]. – 17 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993
[55]

Conformal anomaly of (2,0) tensor multiplet in six dimensions and AdS/CFT correspondence

F. Bastianelli, S. Frolov and A. A. Tseytlin,Conformal anomaly of (2,0) tensor multiplet in six-dimensions and AdS / CFT correspondence,JHEP02(2000) 013 [hep-th/0001041]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[56]

Algebraic Classification of Weyl Anomalies in Arbitrary Dimensions

N. Boulanger,Algebraic Classification of Weyl Anomalies in Arbitrary Dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 261302 [0706.0340]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[57]

The Holographic Weyl anomaly

M. Henningson and K. Skenderis,The Holographic Weyl anomaly,JHEP07(1998) 023 [hep-th/9806087]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[58]

Gunaydin, P

M. Gunaydin, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and N. P. Warner,General Construction of the Unitary Representations of Anti-de Sitter Superalgebras and the Spectrum of the S 4 Compactification of Eleven-dimensional Supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B255(1985) 63

work page 1985
[59]

van Nieuwenhuizen,The Complete Mass Spectrum of d = 11Supergravity Compactified on S(4) and a General Mass Formula for Arbitrary Cosets M(4),Class

P. van Nieuwenhuizen,The Complete Mass Spectrum of d = 11Supergravity Compactified on S(4) and a General Mass Formula for Arbitrary Cosets M(4),Class. Quant. Grav.2(1985) 1

work page 1985
[60]

R. R. Metsaev,6d conformal gravity,J. Phys. A44(2011) 175402 [1012.2079]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[61]

Supersymmetry Constraints in Holographic Gravities

M. Kulaxizi and A. Parnachev,Supersymmetry Constraints in Holographic Gravities,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 066001 [0912.4244]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[62]

Supergravity one-loop corrections on AdS_7 and AdS_3, higher spins and AdS/CFT

M. Beccaria, G. Macorini and A. A. Tseytlin,Supergravity one-loop corrections on AdS 7 and AdS3, higher spins and AdS/CFT,Nucl. Phys. B892(2015) 211 [1412.0489]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[63]

Local Symmetries in the AdS_7/CFT_6 Correspondence

M. Nishimura and Y. Tanii,Local symmetries in the AdS(7) / CFT(6) correspondence,Mod. Phys. Lett. A14(1999) 2709 [hep-th/9910192]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[64]

P. S. Howe, G. Sierra and P. K. Townsend,Supersymmetry in Six-Dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B221 (1983) 331

work page 1983
[65]

A note on R-currents and trace anomalies in the (2,0) tensor multiplet in d=6 and AdS/CFT correspondence

R. Manvelyan and A. C. Petkou,A Note on R currents and trace anomalies in the (2,0) tensor multiplet in d = 6 AdS / CFT correspondence,Phys. Lett. B483(2000) 264 [hep-th/0003017]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[66]

On the supermultiplet of anomalous currents in d=6

R. Manvelyan and W. Ruhl,On the supermultiplet of anomalous currents in d = 6,Phys. Lett. B 567(2003) 53 [hep-th/0305138]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[67]

P. H. Frampton and T. W. Kephart,Explicit Evaluation of Anomalies in Higher Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.50(1983) 1343

work page 1983
[68]

Alvarez-Gaume and E

L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten,Gravitational Anomalies,Nucl. Phys. B234(1984) 269

work page 1984
[69]

Zumino, Y.-S

B. Zumino, Y.-S. Wu and A. Zee,Chiral Anomalies, Higher Dimensions, and Differential Geometry,Nucl. Phys. B239(1984) 477

work page 1984
[70]

L. J. Romans,Selfduality for Interacting Fields: Covariant Field Equations for Six-dimensional Chiral Supergravities,Nucl. Phys. B276(1986) 71

work page 1986
[71]

P. S. Aspinwall,K3 surfaces and string duality, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 96): Fields, Strings, and Duality, pp. 421–540, 11, 1996, hep-th/9611137

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[72]

R. R. Metsaev and A. A. Tseytlin,On loop corrections to string theory effective actions,Nucl. Phys. B298(1988) 109

work page 1988
[73]

J. A. Minahan,One Loop Amplitudes on Orbifolds and the Renormalization of Coupling Constants,Nucl. Phys. B298(1988) 36. – 18 –

work page 1988
[74]

Supersymmetry Constraints and String Theory on K3

Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang and X. Yin,Supersymmetry Constraints and String Theory on K3,JHEP12(2015) 142 [1508.07305]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[75]

M. Berg, I. Buchberger and O. Schlotterer,From maximal to minimal supersymmetry in string loop amplitudes,JHEP04(2017) 163 [1603.05262]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[76]

Z. Bern, S. Davies, T. Dennen and Y.-t. Huang,Absence of Three-Loop Four-Point Divergences in N=4 Supergravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 201301 [1202.3423]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[77]

Z. Bern, S. Davies and T. Dennen,The Ultraviolet Critical Dimension of Half-Maximal Supergravity at Three Loops,1412.2441

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[78]

Z. Bern, C. Cheung, H.-H. Chi, S. Davies, L. Dixon and J. Nohle,Evanescent Effects Can Alter Ultraviolet Divergences in Quantum Gravity without Physical Consequences,Phys. Rev. Lett.115 (2015) 211301 [1507.06118]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[79]

Z. Bern, A. Edison, D. Kosower and J. Parra-Martinez,Curvature-squared multiplets, evanescent effects, and the U(1) anomaly inN= 4supergravity,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 066004 [1706.01486]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[80]

Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez and R. Roiban,Canceling the U(1) Anomaly in the S Matrix of N=4 Supergravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 101604 [1712.03928]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.