Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 73 references

Equilibrium measures for higher dimensional rotationally symmetric Riesz gases

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For rotationally symmetric Riesz gases, this paper solves the reverse problem: starting from a prescribed equilibrium density on the unit ball, it constructs the confining potential that produces it, and verifies the full Euler–Lagrange con

desk verdict A solid inverse-construction paper for radially symmetric Riesz equilibrium measures; the main results are sound, and the only real gap is the half-space sufficiency for general d, which the authors explicitly leave as a conjecture. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.03047 v1 pith:AERQ2FXU submitted 2026-02-03 math-ph cond-mat.stat-mechmath.MPmath.PR

Sung-Soo Byun , Peter J. Forrester , Satya N. Majumdar , Gregory Schehr This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phcond-mat.stat-mechmath.MPmath.PR MSC 31A1533C0582B05
keywords RieszgasequilibriummeasureEuler-LagrangeconditionshypergeometricidentityFunk-Heckeformulahalf-spaceCoulombpower-typepotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper addresses a reverse problem for Riesz gases in d dimensions: instead of computing the equilibrium measure from a given confining potential, it starts from a prescribed radially symmetric density supported on the unit ball and asks which potential produces it. The main theorem (Theorem 2.1) gives a general construction: for any admissible power series density, the potential is written explicitly, and a concrete inequality (2.7) decides whether the soft-edge Euler–Lagrange conditions hold. The paper verifies that inequality for two families: densities proportional to (1−|x|^2)^α, with polynomial potentials for special α, and purely power-type potentials |x|^{2p}, whose equilibrium density is a closed-form hypergeometric function. These are among the first explicit equilibrium measures beyond the harmonic and Coulomb cases. The same machinery yields a necessary condition—sharp in d=3, conjectural in general—for a half-space confined Coulomb gas to collapse to its boundary plane.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is Theorem 2.1's Euler–Lagrange machine: it reduces the soft-edge equilibrium problem to checking a single inequality (2.7) outside the unit ball, with the potential and the Robin constant expressed as coefficient series. The proof of the equality part relies on the Funk–Hecke formula to turn the d-dimensional Riesz potential into a one-dimensional integral and then on Lemma 3.3, a new identity between two 3F2 hypergeometric functions at unit argument (written as (2.12)), which cancels infinite sums and yields the closed forms.

What would settle it

Numerically evaluate G(x)−G(0) for d=2 and a fixed t>0; if the minimum over x≥0 is negative, Conjecture 2.8 is false and full boundary support does not occur for all a≥a_cri. Alternatively, find an admissible sequence satisfying (2.1)–(2.2) for which the inequality (2.7) fails for some |x|≥1—that would show the converse construction does not always yield a soft-edge equilibrium measure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for any admissible sequence {a_k} defining a radially symmetric probability density on the unit ball, the potential V(x) in (2.4) makes that density the equilibrium measure for the hard-wall model, and, provided inequality (2.7) holds for all |x|≥1, for the soft-edge model as well (Theorem 2.1). The paper proves the inequality for two concrete families: the power-type density with α = s−d/2+2m+1 and polynomial potentials (Theorem 2.4), and the purely power-type potential |x|^{2p} with the equilibrium density given by an explicit 2F1 function (Theorem 2.6). For the half-space Coulomb gas in dimension d+1, it derives the necessary condition a ≥ a_cri(d) for full bound

Load-bearing premise

For the half-space application, the claim that a ≥ a_cri is sufficient (not just necessary) depends on an unproved monotonicity of the function G(x) defined by (2.58)–(2.59), verified only in dimension 3; for general admissible densities, the whole construction requires checking the explicit inequality (2.7) outside the unit ball, which the paper does only for two families.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Explicit equilibrium densities for two new families of Riesz-gas potentials become available, enabling further study of fluctuations, edge behaviour, and microscopic structure.
  • The hypergeometric identity (2.12) gives a reusable tool for evaluating Riesz potentials of radial measures, likely applicable to other exponents and dimensions.
  • The half-space threshold a_cri(d) is computed exactly; in d=3 the full characterization is proved, pinning down the transition where the gas becomes confined to the boundary plane.
  • The large-deviation rate for P[x_0 ≥ a] in (2.55) is explicit, showing the exponential cost of pushing the gas away from the wall in the Coulomb case.
  • The framework converts the variational inequality into a checkable coefficient condition, so future work can test admissibility for other prescribed densities by verifying (2.7).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The construction likely extends to more general radial densities beyond the two displayed families; the paper leaves the inequality (2.7) as a condition to verify case-by-case, so the method is a template rather than a complete classification.
  • Editorial inference: The 3F2 identity (2.12) may belong to a broader family of Thomae-type hypergeometric relations; if so, the construction could be automated to generate many more explicit equilibria.
  • Editorial inference: For the half-space problem, numerically evaluating G(x)−G(0) in d=2 for various t would directly test Conjecture 2.8; if a counterexample appears, the boundary-support threshold may have a more subtle dimension dependence.
  • Editorial inference: The energy formula (2.38) for power-type potentials connects to large-deviation asymptotics for partition functions; in the log-gas limit s→0 it recovers known weighted-energy values, suggesting the formula may seed further random-matrix applications.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a converse construction for rotationally symmetric Riesz gases on R^d with kernel |x-y|^{-s}, s in [d-2,d). Given a radial density on the unit ball written as a power series in |x|^2, it defines a radial potential V in (2.4) that makes the Euler-Lagrange equality hold identically on the support, and shows that µ is the equilibrium measure provided an inequality (2.7) holds outside the unit ball. The key technical ingredient is a hypergeometric identity (Lemma 3.3, equivalently (2.12)). Two explicit families are worked out: power-type equilibrium densities (1-|x|^2)^α with polynomial potentials for α = s-d/2+2m+1 (Theorem 2.4), and power-type potentials |x|^{2p} with an explicit 2F1 density (Theorem 2.6). For a half-space Coulomb gas in dimension d+1, the paper proves a necessary condition a ≥ a_cri(d) for full support on the boundary hyperplane (Theorem 2.7), with sufficiency proved only for d=3 in Appendix A and stated as Conjecture 2.8 for general d.

Significance. The inverse construction is novel and systematic: rather than fitting parameters, the density is prescribed and the potential is derived, with the Euler-Lagrange inequality checked independently. This is a genuine contribution to the sparse list of explicit Riesz equilibrium measures in higher dimensions. The hypergeometric identity (2.12) is of independent interest. The paper is also careful to distinguish proven results from conjectures, and the half-space threshold generalizes the known d=0,1 results. The lack of fitted parameters and the explicit, verifiable inequalities are notable strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theorem 2.6 / §3.3, Eq. (2.37)] The proof verifies the Euler-Lagrange inequality (2.7) via Lemma 3.6, but it does not establish that the density in (2.37) is nonnegative on the unit ball. This is load-bearing: Theorem 2.1 applies only to admissible sequences (Definition 1), and the equilibrium measure is by definition a probability measure. Lemma 2.5 asserts a 'well defined non-negative density', but its proof only derives the potential (2.36). Please add a short argument proving positivity of (2.37) for all |x|≤1 (for example, via the integral representation used in Lemma 3.6 or the transformation 2F1(a,a-p;a+1-p;z)=(1-z)^{1-a}2F1(1-p,1;a+1-p;z)).
  2. [§2.4, Conjecture 2.8] The sufficiency of a ≥ a_cri(d) for full boundary support is proved only for d=0,1 and d=3 (Appendix A); for general d it remains an open conjecture. The paper is explicit about this, and Theorem 2.7(i) is correctly stated as a necessary condition. Nevertheless, the regime classification (iii) in Section 2.4 ('Fully effective hard wall') is conditional for d≠3. Please mark this consistently, e.g. by referring to Conjecture 2.8 directly in that bullet list, so that readers do not mistake the conditional classification for a proved theorem.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Definition 1] The sequence is denoted {a_n}_{n=1}^∞, but the series in (2.1)-(2.2) start at n=0; please fix the indexing.
  2. [Lemma 3.2 proof] In the derivation of the term II, the intermediate line contains 2F1(s/2, s/2; 1; u^2); the correct parameters from the quadratic transformation (3.10) are (s/2, (s-d+2)/2; d/2; u^2).
  3. [Remark 11 / Eqs. (2.58)-(2.59)] The notation G(x):=G(x)+x^2 uses the same symbol for two different functions, which is confusing. Please use distinct typographical conventions (e.g. G and mathfrak G).
  4. [Eq. (2.54), d=0] For d=0 the formula for µ_W on R^0 is degenerate; please explain the convention or exclude d=0 from that display and state the one-dimensional result separately.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the converse construction is genuine and the Euler-Lagrange inequalities are independently verified.

full rationale

The paper is an explicit inverse construction: it prescribes a radially symmetric density through the coefficients {a_k}, obtains the associated potential V(x) in (2.4) by direct evaluation of the Riesz potential (Proposition 3.4, Lemma 3.3), and then verifies the Euler-Lagrange inequality (2.7) for the two concrete families (Theorems 2.4 and 2.6). The equality part is satisfied by construction, which is the intended converse method, but the inequality part is an independent positivity check carried out in Lemmas 3.5 and 3.6. No parameter is fitted to data and no external quantity is renamed as a prediction. The central hypergeometric identity (Lemma 3.3) is proved in the paper itself, not imported from a self-citation. The self-citations that do appear — [3] in Remark 7 and [35] in the discussion of Conjecture 2.8 — are used for consistency checks and for known d=0,1 cases, respectively; they are not load-bearing for the main derivation. The half-space application has an explicitly open point: Conjecture 2.8, the sufficiency of a >= a_cri(d) for general d, is flagged as unproved except for d=3 (Appendix A) and the previously known d=0,1. That is a limitation of the application, not a circular step, because the necessary direction (Theorem 2.7(i)) is proven and the missing direction is openly identified rather than assumed. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and the central claims do not reduce to their inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters: all constants are determined by probability normalization and the chosen density. The central claims rest on standard EL theory and a cited LDP, plus the admissibility restrictions on the input series. The only unproved ingredient is the d≠3 case of Conjecture 2.8, which the authors clearly flag as open.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Euler-Lagrange characterization of equilibrium measures via Frostman's theorem for 0<s<d (ref. [36, Thm 2])
    Used in (1.7) to characterize the minimizer; standard potential theory result.
  • standard math Large deviation principle for Riesz gases of Leblé-Serfaty [60, Cor 1.1] used in (4.25)
    Imported for the half-space large deviation formula (2.55).
  • domain assumption Admissibility of the coefficient sequence {a_k}: convergence of series (2.1)-(2.2) and nonnegativity of the density
    Defines the class of input densities in Definition 1; checked for the specific examples.
  • ad hoc to paper Conjecture 2.8: G(x) ≥ G(0) for all x ≥ 0 in (2.58), equivalent to sufficiency of a ≥ a_cri, proved only for d=3 (Appendix A)
    Load-bearing for the half-space full-support result for general d; explicitly labeled a conjecture.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Equilibrium measures for higher dimensional rotationally symmetric Riesz gases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AERQ2FXU

@misc{pith2026260203047,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Equilibrium measures for higher dimensional rotationally symmetric Riesz gases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AERQ2FXU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.03047}
}
abstract

We study equilibrium measures for Riesz gases in dimension $d$ with pairwise interaction kernel $|x-y|^{-s}$, subject to radially symmetric external fields. We characterise broad classes of confining potentials for which the equilibrium measure is supported on the unit ball and admits an explicit density. Our main contribution is a converse construction: starting from a prescribed radially symmetric equilibrium density given as a power series in the squared radius, we determine the associated external potential and establish the corresponding Euler-Lagrange variational conditions. A key ingredient in the proof is an identity between two ${}_3F_2$ hypergeometric functions evaluated at unit argument, which is of independent interest. As applications, we identify the external potentials corresponding to equilibrium densities proportional to $(1-|x|^2)^\alpha$, $\alpha>-1$, and show that these potentials can be expressed in terms of Gauss hypergeometric functions ${}_2F_1$, reducing to polynomials for special values of $\alpha$. We also determine the equilibrium measure associated with purely power-type external potentials, often referred to as Freud or Mittag--Leffler potentials in the context of log gases, for which the equilibrium density admits an explicit ${}_2F_1$ representation. Furthermore, we apply our framework to a Coulomb gas in dimension $d+1$ confined by a harmonic potential to the half-space. We derive a necessary condition under which the equilibrium measure is fully supported on the boundary hyperplane of dimension $d$, with the induced density corresponding to that of a Riesz gas with exponent $s=d-1$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.03047 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Graphs of the density |x| → µ(|x|) in (2.37), where d = 2 and p = 3. Then the associated equilibrium measure is supported on [−1, 1] with density (2.44) 2p π |x| 2p−1 Z 1/|x| 1 u 2p−1 √ u 2 − 1 du; see e.g. [71, Chapter IV.5] and [26, Eq.(1.9)]. For an application to random matrix theory, specifically to products of random matrices, we refer the reader to [40]. Here, compared to [26, Eq.(1.9)], we take a proper norm… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Graphs of the density x 7→ G(x) − G(0). Acknowledgments. SSB was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grants (RS-2023- 00301976, RS-2025-00516909). Funding support to PJF for this research was through the Australian Research Council Discovery Project grant DP250102552. SNM and GS acknowledge support from ANR Grant No. ANR-23-CE30-0020-01 EDIPS. This collaboration was begun during the MATRIX program… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Adhikari,Hole probabilities forβ-ensembles and determinantal point processes in the complex plane, Electron

    K. Adhikari,Hole probabilities forβ-ensembles and determinantal point processes in the complex plane, Electron. J. Probab. 23(2018), 1

    2018

  2. [2]

    Adhikari and N

    K. Adhikari and N. K. Reddy,Hole probabilities for finite and infinite Ginibre ensembles, Int. Math. Res. Not.2017(2017), 6694

    2017

  3. [3]

    Agarwal, A

    S. Agarwal, A. Dhar, M. Kulkarni, A. Kundu, S. N. Majumdar, D. Mukamel and G. Schehr,Harmonically confined particles with long-range repulsive interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019), 100603

    2019

  4. [4]

    Aizenman and P

    M. Aizenman and P. A. Martin,Structure of Gibbs states of one dimensional Coulomb systems, Comm. Math. Phys.78 (1980), 99

    1980

  5. [5]

    Ameur, C

    Y. Ameur, C. Charlier, J. Cronvall and J. Lenells,Disk counting statistics near hard edges of random normal matrices: the multi-component regime, Adv. Math.441(2024), 109549

    2024

  6. [6]

    Ameur, N.-G

    Y. Ameur, N.-G. Kang and N. Makarov,Rescaling Ward identities in the random normal matrix model, Constr. Approx.50 (2019), 63

    2019

  7. [7]

    Ameur, N.-G

    Y. Ameur, N.-G. Kang, N. Makarov and A. Wennman,Scaling limits of random normalmatrix processes at singular boundary points, J. Funct. Anal.278(2020), 108340

    2020

  8. [8]

    S. N. Armstrong, S. Serfaty and O. Zeitouni,Remarks on a constrained optimization problem for the Ginibre ensemble, Potential Anal.41(2014), 945958

    2014

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    R. J. Baxter,Statistical mechanics of a one-dimensional Coulomb system with a uniform charge background, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.59(1963), 779

    1963

  2. [10]

    Ben Arous, A

    G. Ben Arous, A. Dembo and A. Guionnet,Aging of spherical spin glasses, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields120(2001), 1

    2001

  3. [11]

    A. A. Berezin,The distribution of charges in classical electrostatics, Nature317(1985), 208

    1985

  4. [12]

    Berezin,Functional central limit theorems for constrained Mittag-Leffler ensemble in hard edge scaling, Electron

    S. Berezin,Functional central limit theorems for constrained Mittag-Leffler ensemble in hard edge scaling, Electron. J. Probab. 30(2025), 1

    2025

  5. [13]

    J. M. Brown and A. Carrington,Rotational spectroscopy of diatomic molecules, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    2003

  6. [14]

    Byun and P

    S.-S. Byun and P. J. Forrester,Progress on the study of the Ginibre ensembles, KIAS Springer Ser. Math.3Springer, 2025, 221pp

    2025

  7. [15]

    Byun and P

    S.-S. Byun and P. J. Forrester,Electrostatic computations for statistical mechanics and random matrix applications, arXiv:2510.14334

  8. [16]

    Campa, Th

    A. Campa, Th. Dauxois, D. Fanelli, S. Ruffo,Physics of long-range interacting systems, Oxford University Press, (Oxford), (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Castin,Basic theory tools for degenerate Fermi gases, in Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi, Vol

    Y. Castin,Basic theory tools for degenerate Fermi gases, in Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi, Vol. 164: Ultra-cold Fermi Gases, edited by M. Inguscio, W. Ketterle, and C. Salomon, Varenna Summer School Enrico Fermi (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2006)

    2006

  10. [18]

    Chafa ¨ ı, E

    D. Chafa ¨ ı, E. B. Saff and R. S. Womersley,On the solution of a Riesz equilibrium problem and integral identities for special functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl.515(2022), 126367

    2022

  11. [19]

    Chafa ¨ ı, E

    D. Chafa ¨ ı, E. B. Saff and R. S. Womersley,Threshold condensation to singular support for a Riesz equilibrium problem, Anal. Math. Phys.13(2023), 19

    2023

  12. [20]

    Charles, B

    L. Charles, B. Estienne,Entanglement entropy and Berezin–Toeplitz operators, Commun. Math. Phys.376(2020), 521

    2020

  13. [21]

    Charlier,Asymptotics of determinants with a rotation-invariant weight and discontinuities along circles, Adv

    C. Charlier,Asymptotics of determinants with a rotation-invariant weight and discontinuities along circles, Adv. Math.408 (2022), 108600

    2022

  14. [22]

    Charlier,Hole probabilities and balayage of measures for planar Coulomb gases, arXiv:2311.15285

    C. Charlier,Hole probabilities and balayage of measures for planar Coulomb gases, arXiv:2311.15285

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Charlier,Large gap asymptotics on annuli in the random normal matrix model, Math

    C. Charlier,Large gap asymptotics on annuli in the random normal matrix model, Math. Ann.388(2024), 3529

    2024

  16. [24]

    Choquard, H

    Ph. Choquard, H. Kunz, P. A. Martin, M. Navet,One- Dimensional Coulomb Systems, In: Bernasconi J., Schneider T. (eds) Physics in One Dimension, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, vol 23, (Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1981), p. 335

    1981

  17. [25]

    Choquard, B

    Ph. Choquard, B. Piller and R. Rentsch,On the dielectric susceptibility of classical Coulomb systems II, J. Stat. Phys.46 (1987), 599

    1987

  18. [26]

    Claeys, I

    T. Claeys, I. Krasovsky and O. Minakov,Weak and strong confinement in the Freud random matrix ensemble and gap probabilities, Comm. Math. Phys.402(2023), 833. 30 SUNG-SOO BYUN, PETER J. FORRESTER, SATYA N. MAJUMDAR, AND GREGORY SCHEHR

    2023

  19. [27]

    Claeys and A

    T. Claeys and A. B. J. Kuijlaars,Universality in unitary random matrix ensembles when the soft edge meets the hard edge, Contemp. Math.458(2008), 265

    2008

  20. [28]

    N. R. Cooper,Quantum Hall states of ultra cold atomic gases, inMany-Body physics with ultra cold gases, Les Houches (2010), Eds. C. Salomon, G. Shlyapnikov, L. F. Cugliandolo, (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    F. D. Cunden, P. Facchi, M. Ligab` o and P. Vivo,Universality of the third-order phase transition in the constrained Coulomb gas, J. Stat. Mech. (2017), 053303

    2017

  22. [30]

    F. D. Cunden, P. Facchi, M. Ligab` o, and P. Vivo,Third-order phase transition: random matrices and screened Coulomb gas with hard walls, J. Stat. Phys,175(2019), 1262

    2019

  23. [31]

    Cronvall and A

    J. Cronvall and A. Wennman,A direct approach to soft and hard edge universality for random normal matrices, arXiv:2511.18628

  24. [32]

    D. S. Dean and S. N. Majumdar,Large deviations of extreme eigenvalues of random matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006), 160201

    2006

  25. [33]

    D. S. Dean and S. N. Majumdar,Extreme value statistics of eigenvalues of Gaussian random matrices, Phys. Rev. E77 (2008), 041108

    2008

  26. [34]

    D. S. Dean, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar and G. Schehr,Non-interacting fermions in a trap and random matrix theory, J. Phys. A52, (2019), 144006

    2019

  27. [35]

    A. Dhar, A. Kundu, S. N. Majumdar, S. Sabhapandit and G. Schehr,Exact extremal statistics in the classical 1D Coulomb gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017), 060601

    2017

  28. [36]

    Dragnev, R

    P. Dragnev, R. Orive, E.B. Saff and F. Wielonsky, Riesz energy problems with external fields and related theory, Constr. Approx.57(2023), 1-43

    2023

  29. [37]

    B. Dyda, A. Kuznetsov and M. Kwa´ snicki,Fractional Laplace operator and MeijerG-function, Constr. Approx.45(2017), 427

    2017

  30. [38]

    Erd´ elyi, W

    A. Erd´ elyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, F.G. Tricomi, Higher Transcendental Functions, vols. I, II, Based in part on notes left by Harry Bateman, McGraw-Hill, 1953

    1953

  31. [39]

    P. J. Forrester,Log-gases and random matrices, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010

    2010

  32. [40]

    P. J. Forrester,Probability of all eigenvalues real for products of standard Gaussian matrices, J. Phys. A47(2014), 065202

    2014

  33. [41]

    P. J. Forrester,Asymptotics of spacing distributions 50 years later, Random matrix theory, interacting particle systems and integrable systems, (ed. P. Deift and P. Forrester), MSRI Publications, 65 (2014), 199–222

    2014

  34. [42]

    P. J. Forrester and B. Jancovici,Two-dimensional one-component plasma in a quadrupolar field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A11 (1996), 941-949

    1996

  35. [43]

    P. J. Forrester and N. S. Witte,Asymptotic forms for hard and soft edge generalβconditional gap probabilities, Nuclear Phys. B859, (2012), 321

    2012

  36. [44]

    Frostman,Potentiel d’´ equilibre et capacite des ensembles avec quelques applications a la theorie des fonctions, Thesis, Meddel, Lunds Univ

    O. Frostman,Potentiel d’´ equilibre et capacite des ensembles avec quelques applications a la theorie des fonctions, Thesis, Meddel, Lunds Univ. Mat. Sem.3(1935), 1

    1935

  37. [45]

    T. S. Gutleb, J. A. Carrillo and S. Olver,Computing equilibrium measures with power law kernels, Math. Comput.91(2022), 2247

    2022

  38. [46]

    T. S. Gutleb, J. A. Carrillo and S. Olver,Computation of power law equilibrium measures on balls of arbitrary dimension, Constr. Approx.58(2023), 75

    2023

  39. [47]

    T. S. Gutlet and I. P. A. Papadopoulos,Explicit fractional Laplacians and Riesz potentials of classical functions, arXiv:2311.10896

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    D. P. Hardin, T. Lebl´ e, E. B. Saff and S. Serfaty,Large deviation principles for hypersingular Riesz gases, Constr. Approx. 48(2018), 61

    2018

  41. [49]

    D. P. Hardin and E. B. Saff,Discretizing manifolds via minimum energy points, Not. Am. Math. Soc.51(2004), 1186

    2004

  42. [50]

    D. P. Hardin and E. B. Saff,Minimal Riesz energy point configurations for rectifiabled-dimensional manifolds, Adv. Math. 193(2005), 174

    2005

  43. [51]

    Jancovici, J

    B. Jancovici, J. L. Lebowitz, G. Manificat,Large charge fluctuations in classical Coulomb systems, J. Stat. Phys.72(1993), 773

    1993

  44. [52]

    Katzav and I

    E. Katzav and I. P. Castillo,Large deviations of the smallest eigenvalue of the Wishart–Laguerre ensemble, Phys. Rev. E82 (2010), 040104

    2010

  45. [53]

    Kethepalli, M

    J. Kethepalli, M. Kulkarni, A. Kundu, S. N. Majumdar, D. Mukamel, G. Schehr,Harmonically confined long-ranged inter- acting gas in the presence of a hard wall, J. Stat. Mech., (2021), 103209

    2021

  46. [54]

    Kethepalli, M

    J. Kethepalli, M. Kulkarni, A. Kundu, S. N. Majumdar, D. Mukamel, G. Schehr,Edge fluctuations and third-order phase transition in harmonically confined long-range systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2022), 033203

    2022

  47. [55]

    Krattenthaler and K

    C. Krattenthaler and K. S. Rao,Automatic generation of hypergeometric identities by the beta integral method, J. Comput. Appl. Math.160, (2003), 159

    2003

  48. [56]

    Krattenthaler†and T

    C. Krattenthaler†and T. Rivoal,How can we escape Thomae’s relations?, J. Math. Soc. Japan58(2006), 183

    2006

  49. [57]

    A. B. J. Kuijlaars and E. B. Saff,Asymptotics for minimal discrete energy on the sphere, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.350 (1998), 523

    1998

  50. [58]

    Lacroix-A-Chez-Toine, S

    B. Lacroix-A-Chez-Toine, S. N. Majumdar, G. Schehr,Rotating trapped fermions in two dimensions and the complex Ginibre ensemble: Exact results for the entanglement entropy and number variance, Phys. Rev. A99(2019), 021602

    2019

  51. [59]

    Le Doussal and G

    P. Le Doussal and G. Schehr,Cumulants and large deviations for the linear statistics of the one-dimensional trapped Riesz gas, J. Stat. Phys.192(2025), 47. EQUILIBRIUM MEASURES FOR ROTATIONALLY SYMMETRIC RIESZ GASES 31

    2025

  52. [60]

    Lebl´ e and S

    T. Lebl´ e and S. Serfaty,Large deviation principle for empirical fields of log and Riesz gases, Invent. Math.210(2017), 645

    2017

  53. [61]

    Lewin,Coulomb and Riesz gases: The known and the unknown, J

    M. Lewin,Coulomb and Riesz gases: The known and the unknown, J. Math. Phys.63(2022), 061101

    2022

  54. [62]

    Majumdar, C

    S.N. Majumdar, C. Nadal, A. Scardicchio, P. Vivo,The Index Distribution of Gaussian Random Matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett., 103(2009), 220603

    2009

  55. [63]

    S. N. Majumdar, C. Nadal, A. Scardicchio and P. Vivo,How many eigenvalues of a Gaussian random matrix are positive?, Phys. Rev. E83(2011), 041105

    2011

  56. [64]

    S. N. Majumdar and G. Schehr,Top eigenvalue of a random matrix: Large deviations and third order phase transition, J. Stat. Mech. (2014), P01012

    2014

  57. [65]

    S. N. Majumdar and M. Vergassola,Large deviations of the maximum eigenvalue for Wishart and Gaussian random matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett.102(2009), 060601

    2009

  58. [66]

    M. L. Mehta,Random Matrices, Elsevier, (2004)

    2004

  59. [67]

    Oblak, B

    B. Oblak, B. Lapierre, P. Moosavi, J.-M. St´ ephan, B. Estienne,Anisotropic quantum Hall droplets, Phys. Rev. X14(2024), 011030

    2024

  60. [68]

    F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark, eds.NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010

    2010

  61. [69]

    H. M. Ramli, E. Katzav and I. P. Castillo,Spectral properties of the Jacobi ensembles via the Coulomb gas approach, J. Phys. A45(2012), 465005

    2012

  62. [70]

    Riesz,Int´ egrales de Riemann-Liouville et potentiels, Acta Litt

    M. Riesz,Int´ egrales de Riemann-Liouville et potentiels, Acta Litt. Sci. Szeged9(1938), 1

    1938

  63. [71]

    E. B. Saff and V. Totik,Logarithmic Potentials with External Fields, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1997)

    1997

  64. [72]

    Serfaty,Lectures on Coulomb and Riesz Gases, arXiv:2407.21194

    S. Serfaty,Lectures on Coulomb and Riesz Gases, arXiv:2407.21194

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    N. R. Smith, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar and G. Schehr,Counting statistics for noninteracting fermions in a rotating trap, Phys. Rev. A,105, (2022) 043315. Department of Mathematical Sciences and Research Institute of Mathematics, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Re...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.