Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

The exterior Reissner–Nordström geometry can be generated by a string-supported interior with an integrable singularity and no inner horizon.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 05:07 UTC pith:TWEWCXNU

load-bearing objection Cloud-of-strings interior is self-consistent, but the new fluid-of-strings model contradicts its own field equations and the horizon matching uses Israel–Darmois at a null surface; the central claim doesn't hold. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2602.03050 v6 pith:TWEWCXNU submitted 2026-02-03 gr-qc

Reissner Nordstrom black holes with integrable singularity interiors supported by string distributions

Milko Estrada This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C7583C4083E30 PACS 04.70.-s04.20.-q04.40.-b
keywords Reissner–Nordström black holeintegrable singularityinner horizoncloud of stringsfluid of stringsjunction conditionsblack hole thermodynamicsphase transition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the two usual pathologies of the charged Reissner–Nordström black hole—a destructive central singularity and an inner Cauchy horizon—are not forced on the interior. It shows that the same exterior metric can be matched at the event horizon to an interior spacetime whose only singularity is integrable: curvature invariants diverge at the origin, but their volume integrals stay finite, so tidal forces on infalling observers remain finite and radial infall is nondestructive. The interior is supported by extended string distributions rather than a point mass, and the paper supplies two explicit realizations, a cloud of strings and a new exponentially screened fluid of strings with finite conserved energy. If correct, charged black holes need not contain a pointlike mass or an inner horizon, and the matching surface carries thermodynamic meaning: temperature is continuous across the horizon, while a jump in tangential pressure signals a second-order phase transition.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a construction: there are static, spherically symmetric interiors with metric ds² = −f(r)dt² + f(r)⁻¹dr² + r²dΩ², defined on r∈[0,h], such that f(0)=1−a with a>1, f is monotone increasing on [0,h], and f(h)=0. Such an f has no inner horizon, and because the Ricci scalar behaves as R∼r⁻² while the combination r²R is nonsingular, the singularity is integrable. Gluing this interior to the Reissner–Nordström exterior at r=h using the standard junction conditions fixes the interior parameters in terms of the exterior mass M and charge Q; for the cloud-of-strings interior the conditions give a=1+(h/l)² and an AdS radius tied to M and Q, and for th

What carries the argument

The machinery is a matched pair of metrics glued at the event horizon, together with the integrability condition on the trace equation r²R=2(r(1−f))′−(r²f′)′; this identity is what lets R diverge like r⁻² while the field equations stay finite. The new fluid-of-strings source replaces the cloud-of-strings density a/r² by ρ=M/(4πb²r²)e^{−r/b}, a geometrical screening that yields a finite conserved energy when integrated over space. The junction conditions, applied at r=h where f(h)=0, serve as the bridge: the first fixes the interior metric value, the second fixes the derivative f′(h), interpreted as the temperature, and the third compares tangential pressures to locate phase transitions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the standard junction conditions formulated for non-null hypersurfaces can be applied at the event horizon r=h, which is a null surface; the derived parameter constraints and the identification of f′(h) with temperature collapse if null-hypersurface junction conditions are required instead.

What would settle it

Compute the junction conditions treating the horizon as a null hypersurface (the null-shell formalism); if the matching conditions change, the paper's parameter constraints, such as l²=(h⁴/Q²)(3b+h)/(h−b), and the critical values Q_c²=15/16 M² and b_c≈0.4116h need not hold. A second, independent check: numerically integrate radial timelike geodesics through the origin in the fluid-of-strings interior and test whether the singularity is traversable and whether tidal forces stay finite.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the construction is correct, the Reissner–Nordström black hole no longer needs a pointlike mass: an extended string distribution produces the identical exterior geometry.
  • The interior has no inner Cauchy horizon, so the mass-inflation instability and loss of predictability associated with that horizon disappear in these models.
  • Tidal forces remain finite near the origin, implying nondestructive radial infall for observers, unlike the standard RN singularity.
  • The matching forces thermal equilibrium (equal temperatures) across the event horizon, and generically predicts a second-order phase transition there, except at a critical charge Q_c²=15/16 M² (cloud of strings) or critical screening length b_c≈0.4116h (fluid of strings).
  • The same junction framework can be applied to other exterior geometries with central singularities, such as hairy or quintessential black holes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the paper leaves implicit: if the null nature of the horizon junction is handled with the appropriate null-shell formalism, the parameter constraints (such as the fluid-of-strings l²) may shift; the entropy-area law S=πh² and the temperature identification f′(h) are the delicate assumptions.
  • A testable extension: compute the full family of radial timelike geodesics through r=0 for the fluid-of-strings interior to verify that the integrable singularity is truly traversable and not just tidally finite.
  • The exponential screening length b is reminiscent of a Debye or string-scale screening; one could constrain b by comparing the predicted horizon phase-transition behavior with quasi-normal mode or gravitational-wave data.
  • The framework could be transplanted to rotating (Kerr) exteriors by matching an axisymmetric integrable-singularity interior, although the junction conditions become considerably more involved.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that the Reissner-Nordström exterior geometry can be generated by an interior spacetime with an integrable singularity but no inner horizon. Two explicit interior models are studied: a cloud of strings (CS) and a new 'fluid of strings' (FS) with a screened energy density. The authors impose Israel–Darmois junction conditions at the event horizon r=h, derive parameter constraints relating interior quantities (a, l, b, α(r)) to the RN mass and charge, and interpret discontinuities in tangential pressure as gravitational phase transitions. They also claim the FS model has finite conserved energy when extended to infinity.

Significance. The question addressed is legitimate and potentially interesting: whether an integrable-singularity interior without a Cauchy horizon can replace the standard RN point-charge model. The paper provides explicit computations and identifies a natural mathematical criterion (integrability of the trace equations). However, the central claim is not supported because of two load-bearing problems. First, the FS model in §II does not satisfy the Einstein equations as written; the stated energy density and tangential pressure are not those obtained by substituting the proposed metric into the field equations, and the claimed finite-energy integral is also incorrect. Second, the matching at r=h is performed with Israel–Darmois junction conditions on a null hypersurface, where those conditions are not applicable. These errors invalidate the parameter relations and phase-transition conclusions of §VI and §VII. If the construction were corrected, the idea might merit further study, but the manuscript as it stands contains fatal technical errors.

major comments (4)
  1. [II, Eqs. (5)–(11)] The fluid-of-strings model is internally inconsistent with the Einstein equations. Substituting f=1−2M/r(1−e^{−r/b}) into Eq. (7) gives ρ=2M/(b r²)e^{−r/b}, not the claimed Eq. (5) ρ=M/(4π b² r²)e^{−r/b}. Similarly, Eq. (8) gives pθ=M/(b² r)e^{−r/b}, not Eq. (11) pθ=M/(8π b³)e^{−r/b}. The derivation of α(r)=2b/r² in Eq. (10) is an artifact of differentiating the metric, not a solution for the source. Moreover, the integral in Eq. (6) evaluates to M/b, not M, so the central 'finite conserved energy' claim is also wrong (and dimensionally inconsistent if b has dimensions of length). These errors invalidate the FS model as presented and all Section VII results built on it.
  2. [V, Eqs. (31)–(32)] The matching is performed at r=h where f(h)=0, so the surface Σ is a null hypersurface. Israel–Darmois junction conditions are formulated for timelike or spacelike hypersurfaces. At r=h the radial normal is null, g^{rr} diverges, and the induced metric on Σ is degenerate; the 'unit vector projected along the radial direction' in Eq. (32) does not exist. The correct treatment requires Barrabès–Israel null-shell junction conditions, which generally do not reduce to f'(h)=f_E'(h). Consequently the identification of f'(h) with temperature and the parameter constraints (50)–(53) and (58)–(64) are not established.
  3. [V–VII (general)] The electromagnetic junction conditions are not addressed. The exterior Reissner–Nordström spacetime has F_{rt}=Q/r², while the proposed interiors have no electromagnetic field. The distributional Maxwell equation n_b[F^{ab}]=4π j^a across r=h requires a surface charge or current on the junction surface. Without specifying it, Gauss's law prevents a smooth source-free matching of a neutral interior to a charged exterior. This is independent of the gravitational junction issue and is a further gap in the support for the central claim.
  4. [III–V] The interior region r∈[0,h] is described as static and is assigned a timelike Killing vector, but for f(r)<0 the line element (15) has signature +−−−, so ∂_t is spacelike and r is a timelike coordinate. The 'temperature' T=df/dr|h and the thermodynamic relations (33)–(36) presuppose a static equilibrium configuration, which is not defined in this region. This is secondary to the matching problem, but it undermines the claimed thermodynamic interpretation and the phase-transition language.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (63)] The exponential is written as exp(−r/b), but at the junction it should be exp(−h/b). This typo recurs in the surrounding text.
  2. [Eq. (36)] The proportionality '∼' is used where a precise relation is needed. The subsequent conclusions about phase transitions depend on the exact coefficients, not just the sign of the difference.
  3. [Abstract/§IV] The abstract claims tidal forces remain finite near the origin, but the paper only analyzes the Ricci scalar divergence. No explicit computation of the tidal tensor or geodesic deviation is given, so the finite-tidal-force claim is not demonstrated.
  4. [References] Reference [8] (Nolan) is cited for Tipler's classification, but the cited paper is not the original source of that classification; the citation should be checked and corrected.
  5. [Notation] In Eq. (11) the components (T^3_3) and (T^4_4) are used, but in a four-dimensional spacetime the indices should be 2 and 3 (or θ and φ). This is a notational inconsistency that should be fixed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the construction is explicitly ansatz-based; junction conditions fix free parameters and the phase-transition values follow as consequences, not as disguised inputs.

full rationale

The fluid-of-strings model is introduced as an ansatz: the density (5) is chosen to make the conserved-energy integral finite, and the metric (9) is obtained by solving the Einstein equations (7)-(8). This is reverse-engineered model construction, not circular, because the paper does not claim the matter profile is derived from first principles. The matching in Sections VI and VII fixes the free parameters (a and l, or b and l) through f(h)=f_E(h)=0 and f'(h)=f_E'(h); the phase-transition values Q_c^2=15/16 M^2 and b_c=0.4116 h are then mathematical consequences of those junction constraints, not quantities fitted to produce them. Self-citations to [7], [10], [25], and [29] appear, but they support background claims and are not load-bearing for the construction. Two flags, neither circular: (i) the abstract's claim that 'tidal forces remain finite' is not proved in the body; it is imported from the same-author reference [7], an omitted proof in this paper, but it does not enter the matching derivation. (ii) The Israel-Darmois junction conditions in Section V are applied at r=h where f(h)=0, i.e., on a null surface, although those conditions are formulated for non-null hypersurfaces; this is a serious correctness risk that may invalidate constraints (50)-(53) and (58)-(64), but it is not a circularity. The central derivation is self-contained relative to its stated assumptions, so the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central construction rests on several free parameters (b, a, l, α) that are fitted or hand-chosen to match the RN exterior, plus a set of domain assumptions about junction conditions, temperature/entropy identifications, and the integrable-singularity criterion. The FS matter model is an invented entity with no independent evidence.

free parameters (4)
  • b (FS screening length) = free; constraint h > b (Eq. 62)
    Introduced ad hoc in ρ=M/(4πb²r²)e^{−r/b}; controls the exponential screening and the special no-phase-transition value b_c≈0.4116h.
  • a (CS constant) = a = 1 + h²/l² (Eq. 50)
    Determined by matching f(h)=0; sets f(0)=1−a<0 for the integrable-singularity behavior.
  • l (AdS radius) = CS: l²=h³/√(M²−Q²) (Eq. 51); FS: l²=h⁴/Q²·(3b+h)/(h−b) (Eq. 61)
    Interior cosmological constant Λ=−3/l² is fixed by requiring continuity of f' at the horizon.
  • EoS function α(r) = α = 2b/r² (Eq. 10)
    Chosen ad hoc to reproduce the desired metric f=1−2M/r(1−e^{−r/b}); it is an input, not derived.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Israel–Darmois junction conditions are applicable at the null surface r=h and reduce to continuity of f and f'.
    Used throughout §V-VII; standard Israel–Darmois assumes a non-null hypersurface, which is not satisfied at the event horizon where f(h)=0.
  • domain assumption Temperature is identified with f'(h) and entropy with the area law S=πh².
    Eqs. (31)-(35) define Tin=df/dr and use S=πh² to relate Δpθ to C_in−C_E; these identifications are coordinate-dependent and not derived from a null-hypersurface formalism.
  • domain assumption The fluid-of-strings energy-momentum tensor (B1) from [19] and the ansatz ρ=α(r)p from [20] are adopted.
    The specific α=2b/r² is chosen in Eq. (10) to obtain the desired metric; the general tensor form is taken from prior literature.
  • domain assumption A curvature singularity behaving as R∼r^{-2} with finite r²R qualifies as an integrable singularity with finite volume integrals.
    Used to define 'integrable singularity'; assumes tidal forces remain finite and geodesic extension is possible, per [6,8].
  • standard math The exterior RN metric solves the Einstein–Maxwell equations with T_EM=diag(−E²,−E²,E²,E²).
    Standard result used in §VI for the exterior geometry and its temperature.
invented entities (1)
  • Fluid of strings (FS) with screened energy density ρ=M/(4πb²r²)e^{−r/b} no independent evidence
    purpose: Proposed new matter model to source the interior of RN with finite conserved energy and an integrable singularity.
    Introduced in §II; has no independent physical prediction and is inconsistent with the Einstein equations as written.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13289 in / 28954 out tokens · 242710 ms · 2026-08-03T05:07:11.494732+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Reissner Nordstrom (RN) black hole is characterized by two well known pathologies: a central singularity and an inner horizon associated with instabilities and a potential loss of predictability. In this work, we show that the RN exterior geometry can arise from an interior spacetime containing an integrable singularity but no inner horizon. In this scenario, tidal forces remain finite near the origin, allowing nondestructive radial infall, while the conventional description in terms of a pointlike mass is replaced by an extended matter distribution. To illustrate this possibility, we provide explicit realizations of such an interior region based on string distributions, namely a cloud of strings (CS) and a newly defined fluid of strings (FS). While the standard cloud of strings model leads to a divergence in the conserved energy associated with timelike Killing vectors, the proposed FS model can be interpreted as a geometrically screened version of the string cloud distribution and admits configurations that, when extended to infinity, describe black holes with finite conserved energy. Physical consistency between the interior region and the RN exterior geometry requires the continuity of temperature across the interface, implying thermal equilibrium between the two regions, while discontinuities in the tangential pressure can signal gravitational phase transitions. These results determine the physical conditions under which string based interior distributions can consistently generate the RN exterior geometry and clarify the circumstances under which phase transitions at the event horizon may arise.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.03050 by Milko Estrada.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Schematic representation of the interior region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Slowly rotating traversable wormholes supported by radially varying string-fluid matter: From regular geometries to photon trajectories

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Derives regular, horizon-free, asymptotically flat spacetimes for slowly rotating wormholes supported by radially varying string fluids and analyzes photon trajectories and circular orbits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 19 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    We are interested in a functionf(r) that is finite at the origin and has no zeros in the interval r∈[0, h]. In this way, near the origin: f(r∼0)∼1−a+O(r n)⇒R∼ Cte r2 (29) wherea >1 and|1−a|is sufficiently large and dominant compared to the termO(r n) near the origin, in order to avoid a zero of the functionf(r) in the vicinity of the origin. As mentioned ...

  2. [2]

    In this way,d f /dr >0 forr∈[0, h], with the temperatureT=d f /dr| h− = d fE/dr|h+

    As mentioned,f(r) is an increasing function from its minimum valuef(r= 0) =f min <0 up tof(h) = 0. In this way,d f /dr >0 forr∈[0, h], with the temperatureT=d f /dr| h− = d fE/dr|h+. It is worth mentioning that this condition leads to the absence of an inner horizon. 10 V. JUNCTION CONDITIONS AND THEIR THERMODYNAMIC IMPLICA TIONS In this section, we first...

  3. [3]

    At the surface Σ, identified with the event horizon radiusr=h, these conditions imply the continuity of the geometry, known as the first fundamental form [ds2]Σ(r=h) = 0⇒f(h) =f E(h) = 0 (31) where [F] Σ≡r=h ≡F(h +)−F(h −)

  4. [4]

    The second fundamental form is given by [G µνxν]Σ(r=h) = 0, wherex ν is a unit vector projected along the radial direction. This implies the following ¯pr(h) =p(E) r 1−hf ′(h) h2 = 1−h· fE(h) ′ h2 ⇒f ′(h) = fE(h) ′ ⇒Tin =T E =T(32) Since the derivative off ′(h) matches the derivative of the exterior region at the event horizon fE(h) ′ =T, in this work we ...

  5. [5]

    More specifically, this condition represents a consequence of the discontinuity (or continuity) of the 11 tangential pressure in black hole thermodynamics

    As we will see below, this condition is not mandatory, unlike the two previous ones. More specifically, this condition represents a consequence of the discontinuity (or continuity) of the 11 tangential pressure in black hole thermodynamics. We obtain the interior temperature from Eq. (24). In an analogous way, we obtain the exterior temperature for the co...

  6. [6]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Internal structure of black holes,

    Eric Poisson and W. Israel, “Internal structure of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D41, 1796–1809 (1990)

    1990

  8. [8]

    Mass Inflation in the Loop Black Hole,

    Eric G. Brown, Robert B. Mann, and Leonardo Modesto, “Mass Inflation in the Loop Black Hole,” Phys. Rev. D84, 104041 (2011), arXiv:1104.3126 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  9. [9]

    Comment on “Regular evaporating black holes with stable cores

    Ra´ ul Carballo-Rubio, Francesco Di Filippo, Stefano Liberati, Costantino Pacilio, and Matt Visser, “Comment on “Regular evaporating black holes with stable cores”,” Phys. Rev. D108, 128501 (2023), arXiv:2212.07458 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Black holes without Cauchy horizons and integrable singularities,

    Jorge Ovalle, “Black holes without Cauchy horizons and integrable singularities,” Phys. Rev. D107, 104005 (2023), arXiv:2305.00030 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Space-Times with Integrable Singularity,

    Vladimir N. Lukash and Vladimir N. Strokov, “Space-Times with Integrable Singularity,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28, 1350007 (2013), arXiv:1301.5544 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    New models of d-dimensional black holes without inner horizon and with an integrable singularity,

    Milko Estrada, G. Alencar, Tiago M. Crispim, and C. R. Muniz, “New models of d-dimensional black holes without inner horizon and with an integrable singularity,” JCAP06, 042 (2024), arXiv:2310.01734 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    The Central singularity in spherical collapse,

    Brien C. Nolan, “The Central singularity in spherical collapse,” Phys. Rev. D62, 044015 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0001026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  14. [14]

    Quantum rotating black holes,

    Roberto Casadio, Andrea Giusti, and Jorge Ovalle, “Quantum rotating black holes,” JHEP05, 118 (2023), arXiv:2303.02713 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    A new representation of vacuum Lovelock solutions in d=2N+1 dimensions: Black holes with an integrable singularity and regular black holes,

    Milko Estrada, “A new representation of vacuum Lovelock solutions in d=2N+1 dimensions: Black holes with an integrable singularity and regular black holes,” Annals Phys.477, 169985 (2025), arXiv:2411.01253 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Physical and theoretical challenges to integrable singularities,

    Julio Arrechea, Stefano Liberati, Hooman Neshat, and Vania Vellucci, “Physical and theoretical challenges to integrable singularities,” Phys. Rev. D112, 044024 (2025), arXiv:2504.17863 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Higher-dimensional charged black holes in f(R)-gravity’s rainbow surrounded by cloud of strings: Exact solution, shadow, and effective potential barrier,

    Younes Younesizadeh and Samireh Jokar, “Higher-dimensional charged black holes in f(R)-gravity’s rainbow surrounded by cloud of strings: Exact solution, shadow, and effective potential barrier,” Nucl. Phys. B982, 115884 (2022). 21

    2022

  18. [18]

    CLOUDS OF STRINGS IN GENERAL RELATIVITY,

    P. S. Letelier, “CLOUDS OF STRINGS IN GENERAL RELATIVITY,” Phys. Rev. D20, 1294–1302 (1979)

    1979

  19. [19]

    Thermody- namic analysis of black holes with cloud of strings and quintessence via Barrow entropy,

    Usman Zafar, Kazuharu Bamba, Tabinda Rasheed, and Krishnakanta Bhattacharya, “Thermody- namic analysis of black holes with cloud of strings and quintessence via Barrow entropy,” Phys. Lett. B864, 139446 (2025), arXiv:2504.00416 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Phase structure, thermal fluctuations and emission spectrum of nonlinear electrodynamics AdS black holes surrounded by cloud of strings,

    Faisal Javed, A. Eid, Abdelmalek Bouzenada, Arfa Waseem, N. Mustapha, Munisbek Akhmedov, Yunus Turaev, and Ertan G¨ udekli, “Phase structure, thermal fluctuations and emission spectrum of nonlinear electrodynamics AdS black holes surrounded by cloud of strings,” Phys. Dark Univ.51, 102207 (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    Topology of 5-dimensional Ein- stein–Gauss–Bonnet AdS black hole thermodynamics surrounded by a cloud of Strings,

    Naba Jyoti Gogoi, Dhruba Jyoti Gogoi, and Jyatsnasree Bora, “Topology of 5-dimensional Ein- stein–Gauss–Bonnet AdS black hole thermodynamics surrounded by a cloud of Strings,” Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102099 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    AdS black hole solution with a dark matter halo surrounded by a cloud of strings,

    Faizuddin Ahmed, Abdelmalek Bouzenada, and Edilberto O. Silva, “AdS black hole solution with a dark matter halo surrounded by a cloud of strings,” Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1385 (2025), arXiv:2509.10829 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Shadow and thin accretion disk around Ay´ on-Beato–Garc ´ ıa black hole coupled with cloud of strings,

    Ziqiang Cai, Zhenglong Ban, Lu Wang, Haiyuan Feng, and Zheng-Wen Long, “Shadow and thin accretion disk around Ay´ on-Beato–Garc ´ ıa black hole coupled with cloud of strings,” Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102169 (2025), arXiv:2506.22744 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    FLUIDS OF STRINGS IN GENERAL RELATIVITY,

    Patricio S. Letelier, “FLUIDS OF STRINGS IN GENERAL RELATIVITY,” Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996)63(1983), 10.1007/BF02755096

    doi:10.1007/bf02755096 1971

  25. [25]

    Revisiting black holes surrounded by cloud and fluid of strings in general relativity,

    Luis Cesar Nunes dos Santos, “Revisiting black holes surrounded by cloud and fluid of strings in general relativity,” Phys. Rev. D111, 064032 (2025), arXiv:2502.15846 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Conserved charges in general relativity,

    Sinya Aoki, Tetsuya Onogi, and Shuichi Yokoyama, “Conserved charges in general relativity,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A36, 2150098 (2021), arXiv:2005.13233 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Schwarzschild black hole revisited: Before the complete collapse,

    J. Ovalle, “Schwarzschild black hole revisited: Before the complete collapse,” Phys. Rev. D109, 104032 (2024), arXiv:2405.06731 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Fake Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes,

    Hideki Maeda, “Fake Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes,” Class. Quant. Grav.42, 235005 (2025), arXiv:2410.11937 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,

    W. Israel, “Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,” Nuovo Cim. B44S10, 1 (1966), [Erratum: Nuovo Cim.B 48, 463 (1967)]. 22

    1966

  30. [30]

    Black holes inside cosmic voids,

    Francisco Bento Lustosa, Milko Estrada, Marcony S. Cunha, and Celio R. Muniz, “Black holes inside cosmic voids,” JCAP05, 052 (2025), arXiv:2503.13391 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Black Hole Space-time In Dark Matter Halo,

    Zhaoyi Xu, Xian Hou, Xiaobo Gong, and Jiancheng Wang, “Black Hole Space-time In Dark Matter Halo,” JCAP09, 038 (2018), arXiv:1803.00767 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Hairy black holes by gravitational decou- pling,

    J. Ovalle, R. Casadio, E. Contreras, and A. Sotomayor, “Hairy black holes by gravitational decou- pling,” Phys. Dark Univ.31, 100744 (2021), arXiv:2006.06735 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Quintessence and black holes,

    V. V. Kiselev, “Quintessence and black holes,” Class. Quant. Grav.20, 1187–1198 (2003), arXiv:gr- qc/0210040

    arXiv 2003

  34. [34]

    Five dimensional rotating and quintessence black hole and their hypershadows,

    Milko Estrada, L. C. N. Santos, and M. S. Cunha, “Five dimensional rotating and quintessence black hole and their hypershadows,” Phys. Dark Univ.49, 102041 (2025), arXiv:2504.11408 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Dark matter and nonNewtonian gravity from general relativity coupled to a fluid of strings,

    Harald H. Soleng, “Dark matter and nonNewtonian gravity from general relativity coupled to a fluid of strings,” Gen. Rel. Grav.27, 367–378 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9412053. 23

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995