Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

$L^2$-Dolbeault resolutions and Nadel vanishing on weakly pseudoconvex complex spaces with singular Hermitian metrics

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A singular positive metric on a weakly pseudoconvex Kähler complex space kills all higher cohomology of the canonical twist, via a new L2-Dolbeault fine resolution.

desk verdict This paper fills a real gap in the L2-Dolbeault theory of singular Hermitian metrics on singular spaces, but the main vanishing theorem rests on an unverified same-author preprint [Wat24, Thm 3.2/3.5] that must be checked before the central claims are taken as established. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.03332 v2 pith:C5RIP66D submitted 2026-02-03 math.CV

Yuta Watanabe This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CV MSC 32S2014F1832L1032L2032J2532C15
keywords L2-DolbeaultcomplexsingularHermitianmetricsspacesL2estimatescohomologyvanishingweaklypseudoconvexmultiplieridealsheavesbigness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's goal is to build an L2 ∂-theory for holomorphic line bundles on complex spaces with singularities, where the metric is allowed to be singular. Its central claim is that the sheaves of locally square-integrable (n,q)-forms form a fine resolution of the twisted canonical sheaf, so sheaf cohomology can be computed by L2 Dolbeault cohomology on the regular locus. On a weakly pseudoconvex Kähler space, a singular positive metric then kills all higher cohomology of that twist, and even the first cohomology vanishes without the Kähler assumption. A sympathetic reader would care because this supplies a proof of the long-expected multiplier-ideal vanishing theorem on singular spaces and yields the usual vanishing consequences of positivity, for compact and non-compact singular spaces alike, without imposing smoothness.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the L2-Dolbeault complex of (n,q)-forms whose coefficients are locally square-integrable with respect to the singular metric and whose ∂ is also locally square-integrable; exactness of this complex is what makes it a fine resolution. The decisive construction is a Stein-complement argument: after a canonical desingularization, the metric is approximated on each sublevel set while preserving the multiplier ideal sheaf, the approximation's singular locus is blown up to produce a positive line bundle and a projective embedding, and removing a general hyperplane plus exceptional loci leaves a Stein manifold. On that Stein region, standard L2 estimates for ∂ are availab

What would settle it

Take a weakly pseudoconvex Kähler complex space with a non-normal isolated singularity and a singular positive metric, resolve the singularity, and compute H^1 of the twisted canonical sheaf using the desingularization formula; a nonzero class would refute the main theorem. Alternatively, inspect the companion approximation theorem on that example: if multiplier ideal sheaves are not preserved after refinement, no Stein-complement set can be built and the global L2 estimates lack a proof.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On a reduced complex space X of pure dimension n, the paper establishes the following: for a holomorphic line bundle L with a singular Hermitian metric h whose local weights are quasi-plurisubharmonic, the L2-Dolbeault complex of (n,q)-forms with locally L2 coefficients and L2 ∂ is exact and forms a fine resolution of the canonical sheaf of locally square-integrable holomorphic n-forms twisted by L. The same complex also resolves the pullback of that sheaf to a canonical desingularization, so cohomology on X is isomorphic to cohomology on the desingularization with a multiplier ideal sheaf. The main application is that if X is weakly pseudoconvex Kähler and h is singular positive, then all h

Load-bearing premise

The global L2 estimates depend on a refined approximation theorem for singular Hermitian metrics that is stated in a companion preprint, not proved here; if that theorem fails for non-normal singularities or for this class of metrics, the Stein-complement construction and hence the main vanishing theorem collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On a weakly pseudoconvex Kähler complex space, singular positivity of the metric gives H^q(X, ω^GR_X(h) ⊗ O_X(L)) = 0 for every q > 0; without a Kähler metric, the first cohomology group still vanishes.
  • The L2-Dolbeault complex is a fine resolution, so the cohomology of the twisted canonical sheaf is computed by L2-Dolbeault cohomology on the regular locus; on compact spaces it is also computed by cohomology on a desingularization with a multiplier ideal sheaf.
  • On compact complex spaces, a big line bundle forces the space to be bimeromorphically projective and gives the same higher cohomology vanishing without any Kähler assumption; nef and big line bundles then satisfy the standard birational vanishing statement.
  • Positive line bundles on weakly pseudoconvex complex spaces satisfy the classical vanishing statement for the canonical sheaf, as a direct corollary.
  • Higher direct images of the desingularized canonical twist vanish, giving a relative version that transfers vanishings between X and its modifications.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the Stein-complement technique should extend to L2-extension and injectivity theorems for singular Hermitian metrics on singular spaces, because the same metric-preserving approximation is the only input needed.
  • Editorial inference: the non-Kähler case stopping at degree one suggests the Kähler assumption is close to optimal; testing a weakly pseudoconvex non-Kähler example with a singular positive metric could reveal whether H^2 vanishing genuinely fails.
  • Editorial inference: the explicit 1/q constant and the ε-weighted norm suggest quantitative versions that track how fast the metric's positivity degenerates; such bounds could connect to analytic singularity invariants in concrete examples.
  • Editorial inference: since weak pseudoconvexity covers complex Lie groups, the vanishing theorem may apply to homogeneous complex spaces and to degenerating families where no global complete Kähler metric exists.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops an $L^2$-theory for the $ar\partial$-operator on reduced complex spaces with singular Hermitian metrics. It proves that the $L^2$-Dolbeault complex is a fine resolution of $\omega_X^{\rm GR}(h)\otimes\mathcal O_X(L)$ (Theorem 1.1), gives a desingularized version and higher direct image vanishing (Theorems 1.2 and 1.3), establishes global $L^2$-estimates on the regular locus of weakly pseudoconvex Kähler spaces (Theorem 1.4), and derives Nadel-type vanishing theorems (Theorem 1.5) as well as compact and Moishezon variants (Theorems 1.6, 7.3 and Corollary 1.7). The proofs combine resolution of singularities, the strong openness property, Demailly-type approximation, and Stein-complement constructions. The main theorems are not circularly assumed, but the proof chain imports essential results from the author's earlier preprints, especially [Wat24, Thm 3.2/3.5] in Theorem 4.4.

Significance. If the results hold, they constitute a substantial generalization of the classical Hörmander–Nadel theory to singular complex spaces with singular Hermitian metrics, going beyond Ruppenthal's smooth-metric framework. The L2-Dolbeault fine resolution theorem and the global L2 estimates would be valuable tools in complex analytic and algebraic geometry. The manuscript is readable, explicitly states limitations, and avoids fitted parameters or hidden assumptions of the main theorems. However, the central chain is not self-contained: several load-bearing stones are imported from unpublished or very recent same-author preprints. In particular, the Stein-complement construction of Theorem 4.4 depends on [Wat24, Thm 3.2 and 3.5], and the proof of Theorem 6.2 depends on an unproved lemma cited to [Wat25b]. These dependencies do not by themselves prove the claims false, but they make this referee unable to certify the central result without further author-supplied verification.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Theorem 4.4; §5, Theorem 1.4] The proof of Theorem 4.4 is the hinge for the global L2-estimates (Theorem 1.4) and hence for Theorem 1.5. The existence of the Demailly-type approximation $\{H^{(j)}_\nu\}$ preserving multiplier ideal sheaves and the associated positive line bundle on the blow-up are quoted verbatim from [Wat24, Thm 3.2 and 3.5], an unpublished same-author preprint. No statement of these results or verification of their hypotheses in the present singular/non-normal setting is given. If these results fail for singular Hermitian metrics on weakly pseudoconvex spaces, the Stein-complement sets $S_j$ are not constructed and the global $L^2$-estimates, and with them the main vanishing theorem, collapse. The manuscript's own Remark 7.5 acknowledges this dependence. The referee requests that the full statements be included and either proved in an appendix or replaced by a refereed reference.
  2. [§4, Lemma 4.3; §6, Theorem 6.2] Lemma 4.3, which supplies the function $\psi$ that is strictly plurisubharmonic near the exceptional divisor, is used in the proofs of Theorem 4.2 and Theorem 6.2, but it is cited to [Wat25b, Lemma 3.2] (another unpublished preprint) and not proved here. Although the statement appears plausible from the Negativity Lemma 2.2, it is a genuine ingredient in the higher direct image vanishing and in the exhaustion singular-positivity construction. Please include a proof of Lemma 4.3 or a detailed derivation from Lemma 2.2.
  3. [§7, Theorem 1.6 and Corollary 1.7] For a non-normal compact complex space, the proof of Theorem 1.6 constructs a metric $h$ with $h=0$ on $X_{\rm sing}$ and with positivity $i\Theta_{L,h}\ge\gamma$ only on $X_{\rm reg}$. The vanishing is then deduced from Theorem 1.2 (or Theorem 7.1), whose hypothesis is that the local weight functions of $h$ are quasi-plurisubharmonic on $X$. The proof does not establish this extension across $X_{\rm sing}$ when $X$ is not normal; the statement itself separates the normal case, suggesting that the extension is not automatic. Consequently, the claim of vanishing "without assuming conditions on singularities" is not fully justified as written. Please either prove that the pushforward weight extends qpsh across the singular locus in the non-normal case, or weaken the statement/conditions accordingly.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typos and grammatical slips: "resolusion" for "resolution", "met rich" in Lemma 5.2, "choosen", "fiexd", "subet", among others. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [§4, Theorem 4.4 proof] The notation is inconsistent: the text defines $H_X$ but then uses "$HZ$" in the last display; also $ZX := \pi(Z)$ should be clarified as $Z_X$. Please correct.
  3. [§3, Proposition 3.1 proof] The proof uses the same symbol $\varphi$ for both the test form and the weight function of $h$. This makes the integration formula hard to follow. Please rename the test form.
  4. [§2.1, Lemma 2.2] The term "$\pi$-ample" is used without definition. Since the paper addresses non-compact spaces, a brief definition or reference would help the reader.
  5. [References] Several bibliography entries (e.g., [HPS18], [Kod54]) are not cited in the body of the text; conversely, the unpublished preprints [Wat24] and [Wat25b] are cited for load-bearing results. It would be helpful to mark which references are the author's own preprints and to provide the arXiv numbers in the reference list.
  6. [§7.2, Theorem 7.4 proof] In applying Theorem 1.4 to the metric $h e^{-\chi\circ\Psi}$, the notation $\varepsilon$ is kept unchanged although the positive function appearing in the curvature bound for the new metric may be different. This is harmless for the qualitative vanishing but should be stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Main vanishing theorem depends on the author's own unpublished Demailly-approximation theorem [Wat24], making the central proof chain load-bearing self-citation rather than self-contained derivation.

  1. self citation load bearing [Theorem 4.4, Proof of Theorem 4.4 (Section 4); used in Theorem 1.4 proof; Remark 7.5]
    "by blowing up the analytic singular locus Z of one approximation H := H(j)ν0 obtained via a Demailly-type approximation {H(j)ν}ν∈N of ˜hj preserving the ideal sheaves (see [Wat24, Theorem 3.2]), there exists a proper modification µ : ˆXc −→ ˜Xc ... and that ˆXc carries a positive line bundle L −→ ˆXc constructed from (π∗L, H) (see [Wat24, Theorem 3.5])."

    This is the key existence step for the Stein subsets S_j = (X_{c_j})_reg \ A_j. Theorem 4.4 is then used verbatim in the proof of Theorem 1.4 to run local L^2 estimates on Stein manifolds; Theorem 1.4 is in turn the engine for Theorem 1.5. The approximation theorem and the positivity of the constructed line bundle are not proved or stated in this paper; they are imported from [Wat24], an unpublished same-author arXiv preprint. The author's own Remark 7.5 calls this approximation 'indispensable.' Thus the central claim's proof reduces, at its hinge, to a self-citation not independently established here.

  2. self citation load bearing [Lemma 2.2 (Section 2.1) and Lemma 4.3 (Section 4); used in Theorems 4.2 and 6.2]
    "Lemma 2.2. (Negativity Lemma, cf. [Kaw24, Remark 1.6.2 (2)], the proof of [Wat24, Lemma 3.6]) ... Lemma 4.3 ([Wat25b, Lemma 3.2]) ... there exist an open neighborhood ˜U of E and a function ψ : ˜V −→ [−∞, +∞) such that ψ is smooth on ˜V \E and strictly plurisubharmonic on ˜U ∩ ˜V, and tends to −∞ as it approaches E."

    The ψ weight is the mechanism that converts the degenerate pullback metric π^*h into a singular positive metric on sublevel sets while preserving the multiplier ideal sheaf. Its existence is cited from [Wat25b, Lemma 3.2], and the proof of the Negativity Lemma 2.2 from [Wat24, Lemma 3.6] — both by the same author, with the latter unpublished. This is a secondary but real load-bearing self-citation: if these cited lemmas were unavailable, the constructions in Theorem 4.2 and Theorem 6.2 would lack proof.

full rationale

This is not a case of definitional circularity or fitted input called prediction: no parameter is fitted to the target cohomology, and the main theorems are not assumed as hypotheses. The derivation is genuinely conditional, however. The chain for the central Nadel vanishing Theorem 1.5 goes through Theorem 1.4 (global L^2 estimates), whose proof uses Theorem 4.4 to produce Stein complements S_j; Theorem 4.4 in turn is proved only by importing, without proof, the Demailly-type approximation preserving multiplier ideal sheaves and the resulting positive line bundle from the same author's unpublished arXiv preprint [Wat24, Thm 3.2, 3.5]. Remark 7.5 explicitly marks this approximation as 'indispensable.' A second, smaller dependency is the ψ function of Lemma 4.3, imported from [Wat25b]. These are load-bearing self-citations, not equation-level reductions, so the paper is not vacuously circular; but its central claim is not self-contained and its validity is hostage to the unverified same-author approximation theorem. Hence score 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No empirical free parameters appear. The central claims rest on standard complex-analytic theorems plus several self-cited results from the author's earlier work; the most fragile entry is the self-cited approximation theorem [Wat24, Theorem 3.2].

assumptions (9)
  • domain assumption Every local weight function of h is quasi-plurisubharmonic (assumption in Theorems 1.1-1.3, 1.5).
    Used to make curvature current iΘ_{L,h} well-behaved and to construct plurisubharmonic potentials on the desingularization.
  • standard math Canonical desingularization theorem (Hironaka/Bierstone-Milman): existence of proper holomorphic resolution whose exceptional divisor is SNC.
    Invoked throughout, beginning Section 2.1, for π: X~→X; needed for all main theorems.
  • standard math Strong openness property of multiplier ideal sheaves (Guan-Zhou; Li24 on complex spaces).
    Used in Lemma 4.3/Theorem 4.2 and Theorem 6.2 to identify I(π^*φ)=∪_δ I(π^*φ+δψ).
  • domain assumption Demailly-type approximation theorem preserving ideal sheaves [Wat24, Theorem 3.2].
    Essential in Theorem 4.4 to blow up the analytic singular locus of an approximation and produce a positive line bundle; not proved in this paper and only available as an arXiv preprint by the author.
  • standard math Known L2 estimates for ∂ on complete/weakly pseudoconvex Kähler manifolds (Demailly book, Chapter VIII).
    Applied to Stein subsets S_{j,k} in Proof of Theorem 1.4.
  • standard math Known L2-Dolbeault resolution on smooth Hermitian manifolds with singular metrics ([Wat25a, Theorem 5.3]).
    Used in Proof of Theorem 1.1/1.2 as the smooth-model exactness of the L2 Dolbeault complex; self-cited published result.
  • standard math Nadel vanishing theorem for weakly pseudoconvex manifolds (Nad90; Dem12).
    Used in Proof of Theorem 6.2 to get R^qπ_* vanishing.
  • standard math Takayama embedding theorem and Steinness of complements of hypersurfaces in Stein manifolds.
    Used in Theorem 4.4 to construct Stein complements (X_c)_reg \ A_j.
  • standard math Negativity Lemma for exceptional divisors (Kawamata; [Wat24, Lemma 3.6]).
    Used in Lemma 4.3/Theorem 4.2 and Theorem 6.2 to produce psh functions with logarithmic poles along the exceptional set.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $L^2$-Dolbeault resolutions and Nadel vanishing on weakly pseudoconvex complex spaces with singular Hermitian metrics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C5RIP66D

@misc{pith2026260203332,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $L^2$-Dolbeault resolutions and Nadel vanishing on weakly pseudoconvex complex spaces with singular Hermitian metrics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C5RIP66D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.03332}
}
abstract

In this paper, in order to develop a more general $L^2$-theory for the $\overline{\partial}$-operator on complex spaces, we provide $L^2$-Dolbeault fine resolutions and isomorphisms, and $L^2$-estimates, for holomorphic line bundles on complex spaces equipped with singular Hermitian metrics. As applications, we obtain several generalizations of the Nadel vanishing theorem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Griffiths and Nakano positivity and Nakano-Nadel vanishing theorems for singular Hermitian metrics on complex spaces

    math.CV 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Nakano-positive singular Hermitian vector-bundle metrics on weakly pseudoconvex complex spaces imply vanishing of higher cohomology of the associated Grauert-Riemenschneider L2-canonical sheaf.

  2. Steenbrink vanishing theorem for big line bundles

    math.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Big line bundles on compact complex spaces satisfy a Steenbrink-type cohomology vanishing theorem after passing to a log resolution and twisting by multiplier ideal sheaves.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Andersson and H

    M. Andersson and H. Samuelsson, A Dolbeault-Grothendieck lemma on complex spaces via Koppelman formulas, Invent. Math. 190 (2012), 261--297

    2012

  2. [2]

    Angehrn and Y.-T

    U. Angehrn and Y.-T. Siu, Effective freeness and point separation for adjoint bundles, Invent. math. 122, (1995), 291-308

    1995

  3. [3]

    Andreotti and E

    A. Andreotti and E. Vesentini, Carleman estimates for the Laplace-Beltrami equation on complex manifolds, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes \' E tudes Sci. 25 (1965), 81-130

    1965

  4. [4]

    Berndtsson and M

    B. Berndtsson and M. P a un, Bergman kernels and the pseudoeffectivity of relative canonical bundles, Duke Math. J. 145 (2008), no. 2, 341--378

    2008

  5. [5]

    Berndtsson, Curvature of vector bundles associated to holomorphic fibrations, Ann

    B. Berndtsson, Curvature of vector bundles associated to holomorphic fibrations, Ann. of Math. 169 (2009), no. 2, 531--560

    2009

  6. [6]

    Bierstone and P.D

    E. Bierstone and P.D. Milman, Canonical desingularization in characteristic zero by blowing up the maximum strata of a local invariant, Invent. Math. 128 (1997), no. 2, 207-302

    1997

  7. [7]

    Demailly, Estimations L^2 pour l'op\' e rateur d'un fibr\' e vectoriel holomorphe semi-positif au dessus d'une vari\' e t\' e K\" a hl\' e rienne compl\` e te , Ann

    J.-P. Demailly, Estimations L^2 pour l'op\' e rateur d'un fibr\' e vectoriel holomorphe semi-positif au dessus d'une vari\' e t\' e K\" a hl\' e rienne compl\` e te , Ann. Sci. Ec. Norm. Sup. 15, (1982), 457-511

    1982

  8. [8]

    Demailly, Mesures de Monge-Amp\` e re et caract\' e risation g\' e om\' e trique des vari\' e t\' e s alg\' e briques affines , M\' e m

    J.-P. Demailly, Mesures de Monge-Amp\` e re et caract\' e risation g\' e om\' e trique des vari\' e t\' e s alg\' e briques affines , M\' e m. Soc. Math. France (N.S.) (1985), no. 19, p. 124

    1985

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Demailly, Singular Hermitian metrics on positive line bundles, Proc

    J.-P. Demailly, Singular Hermitian metrics on positive line bundles, Proc. Conf. Complex algebraic varieties (Bayreuth, April 2-6, 1990), edited by K. Hulek, T. Peternell, M. Schneider, F. Schreyer, Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 1507, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992

    1990

  2. [10]

    Demailly, Analytic Methods in Algebraic Geometry, Surveys of Modern Mathematics, vol

    J.-P. Demailly, Analytic Methods in Algebraic Geometry, Surveys of Modern Mathematics, vol. 1, International Press, Somerville, MA; Higher Education Press, Beijing, 2012

    2012

  3. [11]

    Demailly, Complex analytic and differential geometry, https://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/demailly/manuscripts/agbook.pdf

    J.-P. Demailly, Complex analytic and differential geometry, https://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/demailly/manuscripts/agbook.pdf

  4. [12]

    F. Deng, J. Ning, Z. Wang and X. Zhou, Positivity of holomorphic vector bundles in terms of L^p -estimates for , Math. Ann. 385 (2023), 575--607

    2023

  5. [13]

    Diederich, Some aspects of the Levi problem: recent developments, in Geometric Complex Analysis, Proc

    K. Diederich, Some aspects of the Levi problem: recent developments, in Geometric Complex Analysis, Proc. 3rd IRIMSJ Conf., World Scientific, 1996, 163-181

    1996

  6. [14]

    Forn ss and R

    J.E. Forn ss and R. Narasimhan, The Levi problem on complex spaces with singularities, Math. Ann. 248 (1980), 47-72

    1980

  7. [15]

    Fujiki, On the Blowing Down of Analytic Spaces, Publ

    A. Fujiki, On the Blowing Down of Analytic Spaces, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 10 (1974), no. 2, pp. 473-507

    1974

  8. [16]

    Fujino, Fundamental theorems for semi log canonical pairs, Algebr

    O. Fujino, Fundamental theorems for semi log canonical pairs, Algebr. Geom. 1 (2014), no. 2, 194-228

    2014

  9. [17]

    Fujino and S

    O. Fujino and S. Matsumura, Injectivity theorem for pseudo-effective line bundles and its applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., Ser. B. 8 (2021), 849-884

    2021

  10. [18]

    Grauert, T

    H. Grauert, T. Peternell and R. Remmert, editors. Several Complex Variables VII, Sheaf-Theoretical Methods in Complex Analysis, volume 74 of Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994

    1994

  11. [19]

    Grauert and R

    H. Grauert and R. Remmert, Plurisubharmonische Funktionen in komplexen R\" a umen , Math. Z. 65 (1956), 175-194

    1956

  12. [20]

    a tze f\

    H. Grauert and O. Riemenschneider, Verschwindungss\" a tze f\" u r analytische Kohomologiegruppen auf komplexen R\" a umen , Invent. Math. 11 (1970), 263-292

    1970

  13. [21]

    Guan and X

    Q. Guan and X. Zhou, A Proof of Demailly's Strong Openness Conjecture, Annals of Mathematics, 182 (2015), pp. 605-616

    2015

  14. [22]

    Hacon, M

    C. Hacon, M. Popa and C. Schnell, Algebraic fiber spaces over abelian varieties: around a recent theorem by Cao and P a un , Local and global methods in algebraic geometry, 143--195, Contemp. Math., 712, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2018

    2018

  15. [23]

    Hironaka, Resolution of singularities of an algebraic variety over a field of characteristic zero, I, Ann

    H. Hironaka, Resolution of singularities of an algebraic variety over a field of characteristic zero, I, Ann. of Math. (2) 79 (1964), 109-203; II, 205-326

    1964

  16. [24]

    H\"ormander, L^2 estimates and existence theorems for the operator, Acta Math

    L. H\"ormander, L^2 estimates and existence theorems for the operator, Acta Math. 113 (1965), 89-152

    1965

  17. [25]

    H\"ormander, An introduction to complex analysis in several variables, Third edition, NorthHolland Mathematical Library, 7

    L. H\"ormander, An introduction to complex analysis in several variables, Third edition, NorthHolland Mathematical Library, 7. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, (1990)

    1990

  18. [26]

    Inayama, S

    T. Inayama, S. Matsumura and Y. Watanabe, Singular Nakano positivity of direct image sheaves of adjoint bundles, accepted for publication in Anal. PDE

  19. [27]

    Kawamata, Algebraic Varieties: Minimal Models and Finite Generation, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, 2024

    Y. Kawamata, Algebraic Varieties: Minimal Models and Finite Generation, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Kazama, On pseudoconvexity of complex abelian Lie groups, J

    H. Kazama, On pseudoconvexity of complex abelian Lie groups, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 25 (1973), 329-333

    1973

  21. [29]

    Kodaira, On K\"ahler varieties of restricted type (an intrinsic characterization of algebraic varieties), Ann

    K. Kodaira, On K\"ahler varieties of restricted type (an intrinsic characterization of algebraic varieties), Ann. of Math. 60 (1954), 28-48

    1954

  22. [30]

    Li, Nadel-type multiplier ideal sheaves on complex spaces with singularities, Sci China Math

    Z. Li, Nadel-type multiplier ideal sheaves on complex spaces with singularities, Sci China Math. 67 (2024), no. 5, 951-974

    2024

  23. [31]

    Matsumura, Injectivity theorems with multiplier ideal sheaves for higher direct images under K\" a hler morphisms , Algebr

    S. Matsumura, Injectivity theorems with multiplier ideal sheaves for higher direct images under K\" a hler morphisms , Algebr. Geom. 9 (2022), no. 2, 122-158

    2022

  24. [32]

    Moishezon, On n -dimensional compact varieties with n algebraically independant meromorphic functions

    B. Moishezon, On n -dimensional compact varieties with n algebraically independant meromorphic functions. I, II, III, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 30 (1966), 133-174, 345-386, 621-656

    1966

  25. [33]

    Moishezon, Singular K\" a hlerian spaces , in Manifolds-Tokyo 1973 edited by A

    B. Moishezon, Singular K\" a hlerian spaces , in Manifolds-Tokyo 1973 edited by A. Hattori, (1975), 343-351

    1973

  26. [34]

    A. M. Nadel, Multiplier ideal sheaves and K\" a hler-Einstein metrics of positive scalar curvature , Ann. Math. (2) 132 (1990), no. 3, p. 549-596

    1990

  27. [35]

    Namikawa, Projectivity criterion of Moishezon spaces and density of projective symplectic varieties, Internat

    Y. Namikawa, Projectivity criterion of Moishezon spaces and density of projective symplectic varieties, Internat. J. Math., 13 (2002), no. 2, 125-135

    2002

  28. [36]

    Ohsawa and K

    T. Ohsawa and K. Takegoshi, On the Extension of L^2 Holomorphic Functions, Math. Z. 195, (1987), 197-204

    1987

  29. [37]

    P a un and S

    M. P a un and S. Takayama, Positivity of twisted relative pluricanonical bundles and their direct images, J. Algebraic Geom. 27, (2018), 211-272

    2018

  30. [38]

    Ruppenthal, L^2 -theory for the -operator on compact complex spaces, Duke Math

    J. Ruppenthal, L^2 -theory for the -operator on compact complex spaces, Duke Math. J. 163 (2014), no. 15, 2887-2934

    2014

  31. [39]

    Takayama, Adjoint linear series on weakly 1-complete K\" a hler manifolds I: global projective embedding , Math

    S. Takayama, Adjoint linear series on weakly 1-complete K\" a hler manifolds I: global projective embedding , Math. Ann. 311 (1998), no. 3, 501-531

    1998

  32. [40]

    Takegoshi, Relative vanishing theorems in analytic spaces, Duke Math

    K. Takegoshi, Relative vanishing theorems in analytic spaces, Duke Math. J. 52 (1985), 273-279

    1985

  33. [41]

    Watanabe, Bigness of adjoint linear subsystem and approximation theorems with ideal sheaves on weakly pseudoconvex manifolds, arXiv:2412.02007v2

    Y. Watanabe, Bigness of adjoint linear subsystem and approximation theorems with ideal sheaves on weakly pseudoconvex manifolds, arXiv:2412.02007v2

  34. [42]

    Watanabe, Nakano-Nadel type, Bogomolov-Sommese type vanishing and singular dual Nakano semi-positivity, Ann

    Y. Watanabe, Nakano-Nadel type, Bogomolov-Sommese type vanishing and singular dual Nakano semi-positivity, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 34(2), 339-394 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Watanabe, Global embeddings of weakly pseudoconvex complex spaces and refined approximation theorems, arXiv:2512.03572v2

    Y. Watanabe, Global embeddings of weakly pseudoconvex complex spaces and refined approximation theorems, arXiv:2512.03572v2

  36. [44]

    Watanabe, L^2 -Dolbeault isomorphisms and vanishing theorems for logarithmic sheaves twisted by multiplier ideal sheaves, Math

    Y. Watanabe, L^2 -Dolbeault isomorphisms and vanishing theorems for logarithmic sheaves twisted by multiplier ideal sheaves, Math. Z. 312 (2026), Paper No. 40, 28pp

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.