Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Quantitative Photoemission Predictions of Semiconducting Photocathodes from Many-Body Ab Initio Theory

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Combining GW+BSE absorption with an exciton-weighted emission probability predicts photocathode quantum efficiency quantitatively, with no fitted parameters.

desk verdict A genuinely new many-body photoemission model with convincing qualitative spectra, but the absolute 'parameter-free' QE claim is shakier than the abstract suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.12997 v2 pith:AKTQ5B4Z submitted 2026-02-13 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Richard Schier , Chen Wang , Jonas Dube , Julius Kühn , Alice Galdi , Thorsten Kamps , Caterina Cocchi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 79.60.-i71.35.-y71.15.Qm
keywords three-stepphotoemissionGWapproximationBethe-Salpeterequationquantumefficiencyalkaliantimonidesphotocathodethin-filminterferenceexciton
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends the classic three-step photoemission model, replacing empirical inputs with ab initio many-body calculations: optical absorption is computed from GW and the Bethe-Salpeter equation, and the emission probability is built from the exciton-resolved energy distributions that emerge from the same diagonalization. The result is a spectral response for alkali antimonides that reproduces the measured shapes for K3Sb, Na3Sb, Na2KSb, CsK2Sb, and Cs3Sb, including fine structure that empirical models miss. For Cs3Sb, adding a Fresnel thin-film correction—accounting for interference, polarization, and the 9 nm film thickness—yields a quantum efficiency peaking near 14%, in line with independent measurements, without any manual scaling. A sympathetic reader would take this as evidence that QE is a calculable material property, opening photocathode design to computational screening.

What carries the argument

The exciton-weighted emission probability is the central object: for each Bethe-Salpeter excitation, the BSE eigenvector is used to build an energy distribution of the excited electron (Eq. 17), which is transmitted through a step barrier to give P^λ_Emission; these are then averaged with weights p_λ proportional to each exciton's contribution to the absorption spectrum (Eqs. 19–21). This object converts the many-body absorption calculation into an emissive yield. A complementary piece is the Fresnel post-processing that replaces the normalized absorption with the fraction 1 − R − T absorbed inside a film of specified thickness and incidence angle, which supplies the absolute scale.

What would settle it

Measure the quantum efficiency of a Cs3Sb film as a function of thickness (e.g., 5, 9, 15, 30 nm) and compare the spectral position and magnitude of the QE peak with the Fresnel-corrected model: the model predicts a specific thickness-dependent shift through interference; a different scaling or a thickness-independent maximum would indicate that transport or bulk-to-surface loss, not interference, controls the yield. Alternatively, time-resolved or energy-resolved photoemission that resolves the escaping electron distribution would directly test the step-barrier transmission assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the quantum efficiency of a semiconducting photocathode can be written as the product of an excitation probability, taken from the GW+BSE absorption spectrum normalized to its maximum, and an emission probability defined as the exciton-weighted average of a quantum-mechanical transmission function through a step barrier. This product, when corrected for thin-film optical effects through Fresnel equations, gives absolute QE values that match experiment without adjustment: for a 9 nm Cs3Sb film the calculated curve reaches about 14% near 3 eV, within the spread of four independent measured datasets. The authors assert that the spectral structure of the emission yield

Load-bearing premise

The central premise is ballistic transport—excited electrons reach the surface without losing energy—so QE is simply absorption times barrier transmission; if inelastic losses occur, the predicted absolute efficiency is an overestimate, and the Cs3Sb agreement could reflect a cancellation with the acknowledged underestimate of high-energy absorption from the truncated BSE space.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Photoemission spectra of alkali antimonides can be predicted from first principles, resolving spectral modulations that empirical three-step models cannot reproduce.
  • Thin-film interference and polarization are not incidental: the quantitative match for Cs3Sb requires the Fresnel correction, implying film thickness and angle of incidence materially change the QE.
  • The model exposes the role of the surface barrier: the overly sharp predicted onset identifies the step-barrier idealization and surface roughness/work-function variation as the factors that soften experimental thresholds.
  • The same pipeline can be applied to any semiconductor for which GW+BSE spectra are feasible, making QE a screening-level property rather than a post-growth measurement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the transport-free premise holds, the predicted QE is an upper bound; adding Monte Carlo scattering should lower it selectively near threshold, which could be tested against energy-resolved photoemission.
  • The Fresnel thickness dependence suggests a design lever: optimizing film thickness and anti-reflection geometry could push the QE of existing photocathode materials beyond current film values.
  • The exciton-resolved weighting might be inverted: measured QE spectra plus absorption data could constrain the effective surface barrier shape or the mean escape depth without new atomistic assumptions.
  • Because the method is parameter-free, systematic discrepancies between prediction and measurement for a given sample could be reinterpreted as fingerprints of defects, stoichiometry, or roughness, turning the model into a characterization tool.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a many-body extension of the three-step photoemission model for semiconducting photocathodes. The excitation step is computed from G0W0+BSE absorption, the emission step is a step-barrier transmission probability averaged over BSE exciton weights, and transport is assumed elastic. The QE is written as the product of excitation and emission probabilities (Eq. 14). The model is validated against experimental QE spectra for K3Sb, Na3Sb, Na2KSb, and CsK2Sb with manual alignment of the calculated QE maximum, and a quantitative, unaligned prediction is attempted for Cs3Sb using Fresnel post-processing with LayerOptics and a 9 nm film thickness (Eqs. 23–24, Fig. 5). The paper claims that this combination gives quantitative agreement with experimental QE values 'without any adjustment.'

Significance. If the quantitative claim held, this would be a valuable advance: it connects many-body ab initio absorption and exciton physics to a macroscopic photocathode observable in a computationally tractable way, and it is tested on several alkali antimonides relevant to accelerator electron sources. The qualitative spectral agreement across five materials is a genuine strength and demonstrates that GW+BSE captures features beyond empirical or independent-particle models. The paper also benefits from being framed as a falsifiable comparison to experimental QE curves. However, the central quantitative claim rests on a single material, a single film thickness, an unspecified optical stack, and two acknowledged but unquantified approximations (neglect of transport, truncated BSE basis). The claim therefore needs substantial strengthening or qualification before it can be accepted as stated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. VI, Eq. (23)] This is the most load-bearing issue for the paper's central abstract claim.
  2. [Sec. III B and Sec. VI]
  3. [Sec. III C and Sec. IV]
  4. [Fig. 5 and Sec. VI]
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. I] Slip: 'Frenel-based' should be 'Fresnel-based'.
  2. [Sec. III] 'aim 2dato' appears to be a formatting error for the software name 'aim2dat'.
  3. [Sec. VI] 'the LayerOpticsnotably enhances' is missing a space.
  4. [Eqs. (15) and (23)] The symbol T is used both for the transmission probability T(E) in Eq. (15) and for the transmittance in Eq. (23). To avoid confusion, use e.g. T_trans and T_stack or a different symbol for the optical transmittance.
  5. [Fig. 5] The caption refers to a 'gray curve' for LayerOptics; please ensure the figure is color-blind safe and that the grayscale is distinguishable in print.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the QE derivation is independent of the experimental QE values it targets.

full rationale

The central QE formula (Eqs. 12-24) is constructed from G0W0+BSE absorption (Eq. 12), exciton weights (Eqs. 9-10), a quantum-mechanical step-barrier transmission (Eq. 15), and Fresnel post-processing (Eqs. 23-24). No parameter is fitted to the experimental QE curves; the only empirical inputs are the material work function used as the barrier onset (V0) and the sample thickness (9 nm) taken from the Cornell sample description. The manual maximum-alignments in Secs. IV-VI are explicitly labeled as an alignment step ('we align the simulated QE to the maximum experimental value'), so they are not disguised predictions. The prior GW+BSE spectra from Refs. [26-29] are independent ab initio calculations; citing them is not load-bearing circularity because the assumptions do not include the target QE. The step-barrier ansatz is stated directly in Eq. 15, not imported by self-citation. Limitations such as neglected transport/scattering ('expected to overestimate the QE') and truncated BSE conduction states are acknowledged and affect accuracy, not circularity. The LayerOptics definition P~Excitation=1-R-T (Eq. 23) is a modeling choice; the unspecified stack composition for HZB comparison is a correctness ambiguity, but does not make the prediction reduce to its inputs by construction. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation chain was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The model relies on standard DFT/G0W0/BSE machinery, an experimental work function, a sample thickness, and an empirical broadening. The free parameters listed are inputs or normalizations, not fitted properties of the material. The key approximations (neglect of transport, step barrier, scissor shift) are stated but their quantitative effect on the absolute QE is not bounded.

free parameters (5)
  • Lorentzian broadening Γ = not specified in main text
    Appears in Eqs. (12) and (20) for the dielectric function and exciton-selective probability. A finite broadening must be chosen; the value affects the spectral shape and absolute absorption, and no sensitivity analysis is provided.
  • Vacuum potential V0 (work function) = 2.9 eV for K3Sb; other materials from experiment/SI
    Sets the emission threshold in the transmission function T(E) (Eq. 15). The paper states 'we adjust the onset to the measured work function' in Sec. III C. This is an external experimental input, not fitted to QE data.
  • Film thickness for LayerOptics = 9 nm (Cornell Cs3Sb sample)
    Used in the Fresnel post-processing (Eq. 23) to match the Cornell sample specification. This is a sample-specific macroscopic input chosen by the authors, not fitted to QE data.
  • Max-alignment scale (manual QE alignment) = Per material: aligns simulated QE to experimental maximum for K3Sb, Na3Sb, Na2KSb, CsK2Sb, and an alignment region 2.5–2
    Explicit scaling in Secs. IV-VI. Used only for qualitative spectral comparison, not for the LayerOptics quantitative prediction.
  • Rigid scissor shift for QP energies = QP correction to the fundamental gap from DFT
    Applied to Dλ(E) (Sec. III C) as a shortcut to full G0W0; validated against full G0W0 in Fig S2, so it is an approximation validated by the authors' own calculations, not fitted to the target QE data.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Three-step decomposition of photoemission (excitation, transport, emission) is valid for these semiconducting photocathodes.
    Basis of the model, inherited from Berglund and Spicer [5]; assumed without derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper Transport/scattering step can be neglected: QE = P_excitation * P_emission.
    Sec. III B explicitly sets the QE as a product, skipping the second step; the authors note this is expected to overestimate QE, but the magnitude of the error is not quantified.
  • ad hoc to paper Emission barrier is an idealized step potential (Eq. 15).
    Used for T(E); the paper acknowledges it gives a sharper onset than measured (Sec. IV) and attributes the difference to surface roughness and impurities.
  • domain assumption Bulk G0W0+BSE dielectric function represents the optical properties of the thin-film samples, except for macroscopic Fresnel corrections.
    The bulk dielectric tensor is used as the input to LayerOptics; surface states, defects, and finite-size effects are neglected.
  • domain assumption Off-diagonal dielectric tensor components are negligible; trace average used in Eq. (13).
    Sec. III A states 'assuming that off-diagonal contributions are absent or negligible'; this is not tested for the anisotropic hexagonal materials (K3Sb, Na3Sb).
  • standard math The exchange term in the BSE Hamiltonian is multiplied by 2, assuming spin-degenerate systems.
    Eq. (6), standard BSE treatment.
  • domain assumption G0W0 and BSE are reliable for these materials, based on previous benchmarks by the same group (refs. 26-30).
    The accuracy of the underlying spectra is taken from prior work; the paper states the numerical accuracy of GW+BSE is of the order of 100 meV for Na2KSb, matching the observed shift.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantitative Photoemission Predictions of Semiconducting Photocathodes from Many-Body Ab Initio Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AKTQ5B4Z

@misc{pith2026260212997,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantitative Photoemission Predictions of Semiconducting Photocathodes from Many-Body Ab Initio Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AKTQ5B4Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.12997}
}
abstract

The development of high-performance electron sources requires theoretical frameworks that accurately link the microscopic electronic properties of cathode materials to their macroscopic photoemission observables. Here, we present a many-body extension of the three-step photoemission model for semiconducting photocathodes, directly integrating the $GW$ approximation and the solution of the Bethe-Salpeter equation on top of density functional theory (DFT). This approach overcomes the intrinsic limitations of standard DFT by explicitly accounting for quasiparticle and excitonic effects in the photoexcitation process. The quantum efficiency (QE) is evaluated by combining the ab initio absorption with an emission probability derived as an exciton-weighted average. We validate this model on representative alkali antimonides and demonstrate that a qualitative many-body description successfully captures complex spectral features that empirical models fail to reproduce. Furthermore, by incorporating macroscopic optical effects such as thin-film interference and polarization via Fresnel post-processing, we achieve quantitative agreement with experimental QE values without any adjustment. Minor discrepancies near the photoemission threshold are attributed to the idealized surface barrier adopted in the model and impurity effects in the samples, highlighting specific directions for future refinements. This work establishes a robust, parameter-free ab initio tool that bridges microscopic electronic correlation with macroscopic observables, providing a critical pathway for the rational design of next-generation electron sources.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.12997 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic overview of the three-step model for pho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Results for binary crystals composed of K/Na and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. (b), it features a large QE between 10% and 35% across the entire visible range above threshold (∼2.0 eV). Interestingly, the measurement [44] features the same spectral modulation predicted by theory. In particular, the first relative maximum, followed by a narrow plateau between 2.4 and 2.5 eV, appears in both experiment and simulations, with only a minimal energetic shift of a few tens of meV. At higher energies,… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Results for cubic Cs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AIM2DAT: A Python-based Automated Ab Initio Material Modeling and Data Analysis Toolkit

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    AIM2DAT is a Python toolkit providing database interfaces, high-throughput DFT workflows, and ML integration for automated materials modeling and data analysis.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Filippetto, P

    D. Filippetto, P. Musumeci, R. Li, B. J. Siwick, M. Otto, M. Centurion, and J. Nunes, Ultrafast elec- tron diffraction: Visualizing dynamic states of matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 045004 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    Schaber, R

    J. Schaber, R. Xiang, and N. Gaponik, Review of photo- cathodes for electron beam sources in particle accelera- tors, J. Mater. Chem. C11, 3162 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    W. E. Spicer, Photoemissive, photoconductive, and op- tical absorption studies of alkali-antimony compounds, Phys. Rev.112, 114 (1958)

    1958

  4. [4]

    E. O. Kane, Theory of photoelectric emission from semi- conductors, Phys. Rev.127, 131 (1962)

    1962

  5. [5]

    C. N. Berglund and W. E. Spicer, Photoemission studies of copper and silver: Theory, Phys. Rev.136, A1030 (1964)

    1964

  6. [6]

    Camino, T

    B. Camino, T. Noakes, M. Surman, E. Seddon, and N. Harrison, Photoemission simulation for photocathode design: Theory and application to copper and silver sur- faces, Comp. Mater. Sci.122, 331 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    E. R. Antoniuk, Y. Yue, Y. Zhou, P. Schindler, W. A. Schroeder, B. Dunham, P. Pianetta, T. Vecchione, and E. J. Reed, Generalizable density functional theory based photoemission model for the accelerated develop- ment of photocathodes and other photoemissive devices, Phys. Rev. B101, 235447 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    P. Saha, O. Chubenko, G. S. Gevorkyan, A. Kach- wala, C. J. Knill, C. Sarabia-Cardenas, E. Montgomery, S. Poddar, J. T. Paul, R. G. Hennig,et al., Physi- cally and chemically smooth cesium-antimonide photo- cathodes on single crystal strontium titanate substrates, Appl. Phys. Lett.120, 194102 (2022)

    2022

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Dimitrov, G

    D. Dimitrov, G. Bell, J. Smedley, I. Ben-Zvi, J. Feng, S. Karkare, and H. Padmore, Modeling quantum yield, emittance, and surface roughness effects from metallic photocathodes, J. Appl. Phys.122(2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    P. Saha, O. Chubenko, J. Kevin Nangoi, T. Arias, E. Montgomery, S. Poddar, H. A. Padmore, and S. Karkare, Theory of photoemission from cathodes with disordered surfaces, J. Appl. Phys.133(2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Karkare, W

    S. Karkare, W. Wan, J. Feng, T. C. Chiang, and H. A. Padmore, One-step model of photoemission from single- crystal surfaces, Phys. Rev. B95, 075439 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Adhikari, P

    G. Adhikari, P. Riley, and W. Schroeder, Spectral char- acterization of a rh (110) photocathode: Band structure interpretation, AIP Adv.9, 065305 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    W. A. Schroeder and G. Adhikari, Evaluation of pho- tocathode emission properties in an electron gun: one- step photoemission from bulk band to vacuum states, New. J. Phys.21, 033040 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    K. L. Jensen, P. O’Shea, D. Feldman, and N. A. Moody, Theoretical model of the intrinsic emittance of a photo- cathode, Appl. Phys. Lett.89, 224103 (2006)

    2006

  7. [15]

    K. L. Jensen, B. L. Jensen, E. J. Montgomery, D. W. Feldman, P. G. O’Shea, and N. Moody, Theory of photoemission from cesium antimonide using an alpha- semiconductor model, J. Appl. Phys.104, 044907 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    K. L. Jensen, P. G. O’Shea, and D. W. Feldman, Emit- tance of a photocathode: Effects of temperature and field, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams13, 080704 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    Cultrera, I

    L. Cultrera, I. Bazarov, A. Bartnik, B. Dunham, S. Karkare, R. Merluzzi, and M. Nichols, Thermal emit- tance and response time of a cesium antimonide photo- cathode, Appl. Phys. Lett.99, 152110 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Parzyck, C

    C. Parzyck, C. Pennington, W. DeBenedetti, J. Balajka, E. Echeverria, H. Paik, L. Moreschini, B. Faeth, C. Hu, J. Nangoi,et al., Atomically smooth films of cssb: A chemically robust visible light photocathode, APL Mater. 11, 101125 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    P. P. Owusu, J. Mama, T. Idso, A. Ullattuparambil, M. M. Rizi, J. Anawalt, and S. Karkare, Characteriza- tion of cs3sb photocathodes at cryogenic temperatures, Appl. Phys. Lett.127, 172101 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    K. L. Jensen, Y. Lau, D. W. Feldman, and P. O’Shea, Electron emission contributions to dark current and its relation to microscopic field enhancement and heating in accelerator structures, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams11, 081001 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    J. K. Nangoi, S. Karkare, R. Sundararaman, H. A. Pad- more, and T. A. Arias, Importance of bulk excitations and coherent electron-photon-phonon scattering in pho- toemission from pbte (111): Ab initio theory with exper- imental comparisons, Phys. Rev. B104, 115132 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    E. R. Antoniuk, P. Schindler, W. A. Schroeder, B. Dun- ham, P. Pianetta, T. Vecchione, and E. J. Reed, Novel ultrabright and air-stable photocathodes discovered from machine learning and density functional theory driven screening, Adv. Mater.33, 2104081 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Schindler, E

    P. Schindler, E. R. Antoniuk, G. Cheon, Y. Zhu, and E. J. Reed, Discovery of stable surfaces with extreme work functions by high-throughput density functional theory and machine learning, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2401764 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Chang, T

    V. Chang, T. Noakes, and N. Harrison, Work function and quantum efficiency study of metal oxide thin films on ag (100), Phys. Rev. B97, 155436 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Napier, V

    I. Napier, V. Chang, T. Noakes, and N. Harrison, From electronic structure to design principles for photocath- odes: Cu-ba alloys, Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 064061 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Cocchi, S

    C. Cocchi, S. Mistry, M. Schmeißer, J. K¨ uhn, and T. Kamps, First-principles many-body study of the elec- tronic and optical properties of csk 2sb, a semiconducting material for ultra-bright electron sources, J. Phys. Con- 11 dens. Matter.31, 014002 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Amador, H.-D

    R. Amador, H.-D. Saßnick, and C. Cocchi, Electronic structure and optical properties of na2ksb and nak2sb from first-principles many-body theory, J. Phys. Con- dens. Matter.33, 365502 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Cocchi and H.-D

    C. Cocchi and H.-D. Saßnick, Ab initio quantum- mechanical predictions of semiconducting photocathode materials, Micromachines12, 1002 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Schier and C

    R. Schier and C. Cocchi, Electronic and optical excita- tions of k-sb and na-sb crystals, Phys. Rev. Materials9, 053804 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    C. Xu, R. Schier, and C. Cocchi, Electronic and optical properties of computationally predicted na–k–sb crystals, Electron. Struct.7, 015001 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev.136, B864 (1964)

    1964

  24. [32]

    Onida, L

    G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio, Electronic exci- tations: density-functional versus many-body green’s- function approaches, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 601 (2002)

    2002

  25. [33]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations in- cluding exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev.140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  26. [34]

    Saßnick and C

    H.-D. Saßnick and C. Cocchi, Electronic structure of cesium-based photocathode materials from density func- tional theory: Performance of pbe, scan, and hse06 func- tionals, Electron. Struct.3, 027001 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, and J. P. Perdew, Strongly con- strained and appropriately normed semilocal density functional, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 036402 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Schier, H.-D

    R. Schier, H.-D. Saßnick, and C. Cocchi, Stability and electronic properties of csk 2 sb surface facets, Phys. Rev. Materials6, 125001 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Saßnick and C

    H.-D. Saßnick and C. Cocchi, Automated analysis of sur- face facets: the example of cesium telluride, npj Com- put. Mater.10, 38 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Schier, D

    R. Schier, D. Guo, H.-D. Saßnick, and C. Cocchi, Sta- bility and electronic properties of k-sb and na-sb bi- nary crystals from high-throughput ab initio calculations, Adv. Theory Simul.7, 2400680 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle green’s function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys

    L. Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle green’s function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys. Rev.139, A796 (1965)

    1965

  32. [40]

    Reining, The gw approximation: content, suc- cesses and limitations, Wiley Interdiscip

    L. Reining, The gw approximation: content, suc- cesses and limitations, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Com- put. Mol. Sci.8, e1344 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    E. E. Salpeter and H. A. Bethe, A relativistic equation for bound-state problems, Phys. Rev.84, 1232 (1951)

    1951

  34. [42]

    J. Dube, J. K¨ uhn, C. Wang, S. Mistry, G. Klemz, A. Galdi, and T. Kamps, Triple evaporation growth and photoemission characterization of bialkali antimonide photocathodes, J. Appl. Phys.138, 045704 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    C. Wang, J. Dube, A. Galdi, T. Kamps, and J. K¨ uhn, Triple evaporation growth of sodium- potassium-antimonide thin films as photoemission source for electron accelerators, J. Phys. D DOI: 10.1088/1361- 6463/ae4246 (2026)

    2026 doi

  36. [44]

    M. A. Schmeißer, S. Mistry, H. Kirschner, S. Schubert, A. Jankowiak, T. Kamps, and J. K¨ uhn, Towards the op- eration of cs-k-sb photocathodes in superconducting rf photoinjectors, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams21, 113401 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Cocchi, S

    C. Cocchi, S. Mistry, M. Schmeißer, R. Amador, J. K¨ uhn, and T. Kamps, Electronic structure and core electron fingerprints of caesium-based multi-alkali antimonides for ultra-bright electron sources, Sci. Rep.9, 18276 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Kirschner, A

    H. Kirschner, A. Jankowiak, T. Kamps, J. K¨ uhn, M. Schmeißer,et al., Measuring the spectral response of cs-k-sb photocathodes for berlinpro, in8th Int. Parti- cle Accelerator Conf.(IPAC’17), Copenhagen, Denmark (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    Vorwerk, B

    C. Vorwerk, B. Aurich, C. Cocchi, and C. Draxl, Bethe– salpeter equation for absorption and scattering spec- troscopy: implementation in the exciting code, Elec- tron. Struct.1, 037001 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Gupta, L

    P. Gupta, L. Cultrera, and I. Bazarov, Monte carlo simulations of electron photoemission from cesium an- timonide, J. Appl. Phys.121, 215702 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    D. H. Dowell and J. F. Schmerge, Quantum effi- ciency and thermal emittance of metal photocathodes, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams12, 074201 (2009)

    2009

  42. [50]

    Karkare, D

    S. Karkare, D. Dimitrov, W. Schaff, L. Cultrera, A. Bartnik, X. Liu, E. Sawyer, T. Esposito, and I. Bazarov, Monte carlo charge transport and photoemis- sion from negative electron affinity gaas photocathodes, J. Appl. Phys.113, 104904 (2013)

    2013

  43. [51]

    Chubenko, S

    O. Chubenko, S. Karkare, D. A. Dimitrov, J. K. Bae, L. Cultrera, I. Bazarov, and A. Afanasev, Monte carlo modeling of spin-polarized photoemission from p-doped bulk gaas, J. Appl. Phys.130, 063101 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    W. E. Spicer, Photoemission and related properties of the alkali-antimonides, J. Appl. Phys.31, 2077 (1960)

  45. [53]

    Musumeci, J

    P. Musumeci, J. G. Navarro, J. Rosenzweig, L. Cultrera, I. Bazarov, J. Maxson, S. Karkare, and H. Padmore, Ad- vances in bright electron sources, Nucl. Instrum. Meth- ods Phys. Res. A907, 209 (2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    S. K. Mohanty, M. Krasilnikov, A. Oppelt, F. Stephan, D. Sertore, L. Monaco, C. Pagani, and W. Hillert, Devel- opment and characterization of multi-alkali antimonide photocathodes for high-brightness rf photoinjectors, Mi- cromachines14, 1182 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Erjavec, Activation of the na2ksb photocathode with cs and o2 at lowered temperatures, Appl

    B. Erjavec, Activation of the na2ksb photocathode with cs and o2 at lowered temperatures, Appl. Surf. Sci.103, 343 (1996)

    1996

  48. [56]

    Santana-Andreo, H.-D

    J. Santana-Andreo, H.-D. Saßnick, and C. Cocchi, Ther- modynamic stability and vibrational properties of multi- alkali antimonides, J. Phys. Mater.7, 035004 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    T. Yue, P. Sui, Y. Zhao, J. Ni, S. Meng, and Z. Dai, The- oretical prediction of mechanics, transport, and thermo- electric properties of full heusler compounds na 2 ksb and x 2 cssb (x= k, rb), Phys. Rev. B105, 184304 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Cultrera, C

    L. Cultrera, C. Gulliford, A. Bartnik, H. Lee, and I. Bazarov, Ultra low emittance electron beams from multi-alkali antimonide photocathode operated with in- frared light, Appl. Phys. Lett.108, 134105 (2016)

    2016

  51. [59]

    Galdi, J

    A. Galdi, J. Balajka, W. J. DeBenedetti, L. Cultrera, I. V. Bazarov, M. A. Hines, and J. M. Maxson, Reduc- tion of surface roughness emittance of cs3sb photocath- odes grown via codeposition on single crystal substrates, Appl. Phys. Lett.118, 244101 (2021)

    2021

  52. [60]

    C. T. Parzyck, A. Galdi, J. K. Nangoi, W. J. I. DeBenedetti, J. Balajka, B. D. Faeth, H. Paik, C. Hu, T. A. Arias, M. A. Hines, D. G. Schlom, K. M. Shen, and J. M. Maxson, Single-crystal alkali antimonide photocathodes: High efficiency in the ultrathin limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.1...

    2022

  53. [61]

    M. A. H. Schmeißer,Photocathodes for high brightness, high average current photoelectron injectors(Humboldt Universit¨ at zu Berlin, Germany, 2019). 12

    2019

  54. [62]

    Wooten, J

    F. Wooten, J. Hernandez, and W. Spicer, Photoemission and electron scattering in cs3bi and cs3sb, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 1112 (1973)

    1973

  55. [63]

    Kachwala, P

    A. Kachwala, P. Saha, P. Bhattacharyya, E. Mont- gomery, O. Chubenko, and S. Karkare, Demonstration of thermal limit mean transverse energy from cesium an- timonide photocathodes, Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 044106 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    Vorwerk, C

    C. Vorwerk, C. Cocchi, and C. Draxl, Layeroptics: Mi- croscopic modeling of optical coefficients in layered ma- terials, Comput. Phys. Commun.201, 119 (2016)

    2016

  57. [65]

    Cocchi and C

    C. Cocchi and C. Draxl, Bound excitons and many- body effects in x-ray absorption spectra of azobenzene- functionalized self-assembled monolayers, Phys. Rev. B 92, 205105 (2015)

    2015

  58. [66]

    Cocchi, H

    C. Cocchi, H. Zschiesche, D. Nabok, A. Mogilatenko, M. Albrecht, Z. Galazka, H. Kirmse, C. Draxl, and C. T. Koch, Atomic signatures of local environment from core- level spectroscopy inβ-ga 2 o 3, Phys. Rev. B94, 075147 (2016)

    2016

  59. [67]

    Cocchi, T

    C. Cocchi, T. Breuer, G. Witte, and C. Draxl, Polarized absorbance and davydov splitting in bulk and thin-film pentacene polymorphs, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.20, 29724 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.