pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.13095 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-13 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· math-ph· math.MP

Theory of Steady States for Lindblad Equations beyond Time-Independence: Classification, Uniqueness and Symmetry

Hironobu Yoshida , Ryusuke Hamazaki This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 22:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP
keywords time-dependent Lindblad equationsteady statesstrong symmetryinteraction pictureopen quantum systemsGKSL generatorsasymptotic behaviorrecurrent time dependence
0
0 comments X

The pith

The algebra generated by GKSL generators determines uniqueness of steady states for time-dependent Lindblad equations, with interaction-picture strong symmetry producing oscillatory asymptotics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper classifies the long-time behavior of recurrently time-dependent GKSL equations under Hermitian jump operators. It supplies a necessary and sufficient criterion for uniqueness of steady states expressed through the algebra generated by the time-dependent generators, valid when the generators are analytic functions of time. The classification rests on two distinct strong symmetries: one in the Schrödinger picture that enforces time-independent steady states and one in the interaction picture that produces non-trivial time-dependent steady states such as coherent oscillations. The same framework recovers known mechanisms including strong dynamical symmetry and Floquet dynamical symmetry while identifying new symmetry-protected dynamics in driven open systems.

Core claim

We establish a criterion for the uniqueness of steady states formulated in terms of the algebra generated by the GKSL generators and necessary and sufficient when the generators are analytic functions of time. We introduce strong symmetry in the Schrödinger picture, which controls time-independent steady states, and strong symmetry in the interaction picture, which is responsible for non-trivial time-dependent steady states such as coherent oscillations. This classification encompasses established mechanisms such as strong dynamical symmetry and Floquet dynamical symmetry and reveals symmetry-predicted time-dependent asymptotic dynamics in a novel class of open quantum systems.

What carries the argument

The algebra generated by the GKSL generators together with strong symmetry defined separately in the Schrödinger picture and in the interaction picture.

If this is right

  • If the algebra generated by the GKSL generators is the full operator algebra, a unique steady state exists.
  • Strong symmetry in the interaction picture implies the existence of time-dependent steady states exhibiting coherent oscillations.
  • Strong symmetry in the Schrödinger picture implies the existence of time-independent steady states.
  • The classification recovers strong dynamical symmetry and Floquet dynamical symmetry as special cases of interaction-picture symmetry.
  • The results apply uniformly to periodic, quasiperiodic, and certain classes of random recurrent time dependence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Engineers could use the algebraic criterion to select time-dependent drives that enforce a desired unique steady state in quantum hardware.
  • The interaction-picture symmetry concept may connect to Floquet engineering techniques already used in closed systems.
  • Testing the criterion on concrete many-body spin chains with quasiperiodic drives would provide direct numerical checks.

Load-bearing premise

The generators have recurrent time dependence and the jump operators are Hermitian, with the uniqueness criterion holding only for analytic functions of time.

What would settle it

An explicit set of analytic recurrent generators whose generated algebra is irreducible yet multiple distinct steady states coexist would falsify the uniqueness criterion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.13095 by Hironobu Yoshida, Ryusuke Hamazaki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of our main results. We present a novel framework to analyze the steady-state structure of open [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematics of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Numerical simulations of the dynamics of a dissipative Hubbard model under periodic (a–c) and quasiperiodic (d– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a rigorous and comprehensive classification of the asymptotic behavior of time-dependent Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad (GKSL) equations under the assumption of Hermitian jump operators. Our results apply to a broad class of GKSL equations whose time dependence is assumed to be recurrent, including time-independent, periodic, quasiperiodic, and certain classes of random time dependence. Our main contributions are twofold: first, we establish a criterion for the uniqueness of steady states. The criterion is formulated in terms of the algebra generated by the GKSL generators and provides a necessary and sufficient condition when the generators are analytic functions of time. We demonstrate the utility of our criterion through prototypical examples, including quantum many-body spin chains. Second, we extend the concept of strong symmetry for time-dependent GKSL equations by introducing two distinct forms, strong symmetry in the Schr\"odinger picture and that in the interaction picture, and completely classify the asymptotic dynamics with them. More concretely, we rigorously uncover that the strong symmetry in the interaction picture is responsible for non-trivial time-dependent steady states, such as coherent oscillations, whereas that in the Schr\"odinger picture controls the existence of time-independent steady states. This classification not only encompasses established mechanisms underlying non-trivial oscillatory steady states, such as strong dynamical symmetry and Floquet dynamical symmetry, but also reveals symmetry-predicted, time-dependent asymptotic dynamics in a novel class of open quantum systems. Our framework thus provides a rigorous foundation for controlling dissipative quantum systems in a time-dependent manner.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a rigorous classification of the asymptotic behavior of time-dependent GKSL (Lindblad) equations with Hermitian jump operators under recurrent time dependence, encompassing time-independent, periodic, quasiperiodic, and certain random cases. Its central contributions are an algebraic criterion for uniqueness of steady states formulated via the algebra generated by the GKSL generators (necessary and sufficient when generators are analytic in time) and a complete classification of dynamics via two forms of strong symmetry (Schrödinger-picture symmetry controlling time-independent steady states and interaction-picture symmetry responsible for non-trivial time-dependent states such as coherent oscillations). The framework is illustrated on quantum spin-chain examples.

Significance. If the algebraic uniqueness criterion and symmetry classification extend rigorously beyond analytic generators, the work would supply a parameter-free algebraic tool for predicting and engineering steady-state behavior in driven open quantum systems. It unifies prior notions such as strong dynamical symmetry and Floquet dynamical symmetry while identifying new mechanisms for oscillatory asymptotics, with direct relevance to dissipative quantum control and many-body open-system dynamics.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (uniqueness criterion, main theorem): the necessary-and-sufficient algebraic condition is established only for analytic time dependence of the generators. The subsequent application to quasiperiodic and random recurrent cases (e.g., §5 spin-chain examples) invokes closure of the generated algebra without an explicit uniformity or ergodicity argument that would guarantee the same control when analyticity is dropped; non-uniform limits permitted by recurrent but non-analytic dependence could therefore evade the criterion.
  2. [§4] §4 (interaction-picture strong symmetry): the claim that interaction-picture symmetry is responsible for coherent oscillations is supported by the analytic case but lacks a concrete extension argument or counter-example for general recurrent generators; the classification therefore rests on an unstated continuity property of the symmetry operators under the recurrence.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] The definition of the algebra generated by the GKSL generators and its commutant should be stated explicitly in the preliminaries with a short example to remove ambiguity when the criterion is applied to many-body systems.
  2. [§5] In the spin-chain illustrations, the explicit form of the time-dependent generators and the verification that they satisfy the algebraic condition could be expanded by one or two lines to permit independent checking.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will make to improve the rigor and clarity of the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (uniqueness criterion, main theorem): the necessary-and-sufficient algebraic condition is established only for analytic time dependence of the generators. The subsequent application to quasiperiodic and random recurrent cases (e.g., §5 spin-chain examples) invokes closure of the generated algebra without an explicit uniformity or ergodicity argument that would guarantee the same control when analyticity is dropped; non-uniform limits permitted by recurrent but non-analytic dependence could therefore evade the criterion.

    Authors: We agree that the necessary-and-sufficient algebraic uniqueness criterion is established rigorously only under the assumption of analytic time dependence of the generators. The applications in §5 to quasiperiodic and certain random recurrent cases rely on algebraic closure but do not supply an explicit uniformity or ergodicity argument that would extend the necessity direction to non-analytic generators. We will revise §3 to state the analyticity assumption more prominently and add a remark clarifying the scope; we will also insert a short discussion in §5 noting that additional conditions (such as uniform recurrence) may be needed to guarantee the criterion in the non-analytic setting. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (interaction-picture strong symmetry): the claim that interaction-picture symmetry is responsible for coherent oscillations is supported by the analytic case but lacks a concrete extension argument or counter-example for general recurrent generators; the classification therefore rests on an unstated continuity property of the symmetry operators under the recurrence.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the classification of asymptotic dynamics via interaction-picture strong symmetry, including its responsibility for coherent oscillations, is developed in detail for analytic generators. The manuscript does not provide an explicit continuity or extension argument that would cover arbitrary recurrent (non-analytic) generators, nor does it discuss potential counter-examples. We will revise §4 to include a brief discussion of the continuity property under recurrence and either sketch a possible extension under suitable uniformity assumptions or note the limitation explicitly, thereby making the scope of the classification transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; algebraic criterion is self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives a necessary-and-sufficient uniqueness criterion from the algebra generated by the GKSL generators under the explicit restriction to analytic time dependence, then classifies asymptotic dynamics via strong symmetries in Schrödinger and interaction pictures. These steps rely on standard algebraic properties of Lindblad operators and recurrent time dependence without reducing any central claim to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The analytic restriction is stated upfront rather than smuggled in, and no renaming of known results or ansatz importation occurs. The framework is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard domain assumptions of open quantum systems theory rather than new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Jump operators are Hermitian.
    Explicitly required for the classification and uniqueness results to hold.
  • domain assumption Time dependence of the GKSL generators is recurrent (periodic, quasiperiodic, or certain random cases).
    Necessary for the asymptotic analysis and steady-state classification.
  • domain assumption Generators are analytic functions of time for the uniqueness criterion.
    Required to obtain the necessary-and-sufficient condition stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5589 in / 1470 out tokens · 34603 ms · 2026-05-15T22:20:36.157727+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 116 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The proof is given in Appendix H

    There exists a time-dependent steady state, i.e., there is a time-dependentρ ∗ t that does not converge to any time-independent density matrix ast→ ∞ such that lim t→∞ ρt =ρ ∗ t ,(79) for some initial conditionρ 0. The proof is given in Appendix H. There, we use the following Lemma proven in Appendix I, which follows from Theorem 2. Lemma 10.Letρ ∗ t be a...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Strong dynamical symmetry To see a situation such thatC Int \ CSch ̸=∅holds, we first consider a time-independent LiouvillianLand focus on a symmetryAthat satisfies the following condition: [H, A] = ΩAand [L m, A] = 0∀m(80) with non-zero real Ω. Such a symmetry is often called a strong dynamical symmetry [39], and with this type of symmetry, the Liouvilli...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Floquet dynamical symmetry The counterpart of the strong dynamical symmetry in a time-periodic Liouvillian is called the Floquet dynam- ical symmetry [56, 96]. For a time-periodic Hamiltonian 13 Ht =H t+T and time-indepedent jump operators{L m}, Ais called Floquet dynamical symmetry if UT AU † T =e −iΩT A(Ω̸= 0) (97) [Lm, UtAU † t ] = 0∀m, t,(98) whereU t...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Thus, it is possible thatC Sch ={cI|c∈C}andC Int \ CSch ̸=∅, which implies class (iv), i.e., time-dependent steady states without non-trivial time-independent ones in Definition 1

    Moreover, unlike the strong dynamical symmetry in the time-independent case,A †A, AA † /∈ CSch in general. Thus, it is possible thatC Sch ={cI|c∈C}andC Int \ CSch ̸=∅, which implies class (iv), i.e., time-dependent steady states without non-trivial time-independent ones in Definition 1. Example11.In Ref. [56], the authors proposed a dissi- pative Hubbard ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    JGN/AiTrFb9X/H6jQTbQpIGhMLI=

    Time-quasiperiodic case In this section, we see applications of Theorems 8 and 9 to quasiperiodic systems, which cannot be explained by the existing approaches. The simplest example is the following toy model: Example12.Consider the GKSL equation onH=C 3 defined through H=   ω1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0−ω 2   , Lt =   0e −iω1t 0 eiω1t 0e −iω2t 0e iω2t 0   . (...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Thus,U F has two eigenmodes with eigenvalue 1:Iandσ z

    When sin(gT /4) = 0, i.e.,gT= 4mπfor some in- tegerm,K 0 ∝IandK 1 ∝σ z. Thus,U F has two eigenmodes with eigenvalue 1:Iandσ z. Therefore, the steady state is not unique, and the eigenmode σz leads to a time-dependent steady state

    work page

  7. [7]

    Thus,σ z is an eigenmode ofU F with eigenvalue−1

    When cos(gT /4) = 0, i.e.,gT= (4m−2)πfor some integerm,K 0 ∝σ x andK 1 ∝σ y. Thus,σ z is an eigenmode ofU F with eigenvalue−1. As a result, the steady state is not unique, with the eigenmode σz leading to a time-dependent steady state

    work page

  8. [8]

    This can be proved by checking that span{K2 0 , K0K1, K1K0, K2 1 }=B(H) [80, 81]

    Finally, when sin(gT /4),cos(gT /4)̸= 0, i.e., gT̸= 2mπfor any integerm,U F is mix- ing. This can be proved by checking that span{K2 0 , K0K1, K1K0, K2 1 }=B(H) [80, 81]. By writings= sin(gT /2) andc= cos(gT /2), we have K2 0 ∝cI−isσ x,(E8) K0K1 ∝cσ z −sσ y,(E9) K1K0 ∝σ z,(E10) K2 1 ∝I.(E11) SincegT̸= 2mπfor any integerm,s̸= 0 and c̸= 1,−1. Thus, I∝K 2 1 ...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Gorini, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J

    V. Gorini, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys.17, 821 (1976)

    work page 1976

  10. [10]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commn

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commn. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

    work page 1976

  11. [11]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems, 1st ed. (Oxford University PressOx- ford, 2007)

    work page 2007

  12. [12]

    Rivas and S

    ´A. Rivas and S. F. Huelga,Open Quantum Systems: An Introduction, SpringerBriefs in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    Trushechkin, Unified Gorini-Kossakowski-Lindblad- Sudarshan quantum master equation beyond the secular approximation, Phys

    A. Trushechkin, Unified Gorini-Kossakowski-Lindblad- Sudarshan quantum master equation beyond the secular approximation, Phys. Rev. A103, 062226 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Mori, Floquet States in Open Quantum Systems, Annu

    T. Mori, Floquet States in Open Quantum Systems, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.14, 35 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Shiraishi, M

    K. Shiraishi, M. Nakagawa, T. Mori, and M. Ueda, Quantum master equation for many-body systems: Derivation based on the Lieb-Robinson bound, Phys. Rev. B111, 184311 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Z. Gong, R. Hamazaki, and M. Ueda, Discrete Time- Crystalline Order in Cavity and Circuit QED Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 040404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Iemini, A

    F. Iemini, A. Russomanno, J. Keeling, M. Schir` o, M. Dalmonte, and R. Fazio, Boundary Time Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 035301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Keßler, P

    H. Keßler, P. Kongkhambut, C. Georges, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, and A. Hemmerich, Observation of a Dis- sipative Time Crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 043602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Kongkhambut, J

    P. Kongkhambut, J. Skulte, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, A. Hemmerich, and H. Keßler, Observation of a contin- uous time crystal, Science377, 670 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Tindall, C

    J. Tindall, C. S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, B. Buˇ ca, and D. Jaksch, Quantum synchronisation enabled by dynamical sym- metries and dissipation, New J. Phys.22, 013026 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Schmolke and E

    F. Schmolke and E. Lutz, Noise-Induced Quantum Syn- chronization, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 250601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Buˇ ca, C

    B. Buˇ ca, C. Booker, and D. Jaksch, Algebraic theory of quantum synchronization and limit cycles under dissi- pation, SciPost Phys.12, 097 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    M. M. Wolf, J. Eisert, T. S. Cubitt, and J. I. Cirac, As- sessing Non-Markovian Quantum Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 150402 (2008)

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    Kraus, H

    B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, S. Diehl, A. Kantian, A. Micheli, and P. Zoller, Preparation of entangled states by quantum Markov processes, Phys. Rev. A78, 042307 (2008)

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Quan- tum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation, Nature Phys5, 633 (2009)

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    P. M. Harrington, E. J. Mueller, and K. W. Murch, Engineered dissipation for quantum information science, Nat Rev Phys4, 660 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Y. Li, P. Sala, and F. Pollmann, Hilbert space fragmen- tation in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Research 5, 043239 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Stannigel, P

    K. Stannigel, P. Hauke, D. Marcos, M. Hafezi, S. Diehl, M. Dalmonte, and P. Zoller, Constrained Dynamics via the Zeno Effect in Quantum Simulation: Implementing Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories with Cold Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 120406 (2014)

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Maity and R

    S. Maity and R. Hamazaki, Kinetically constrained models constructed from dissipative quantum dynam- ics, Phys. Rev. B110, 014301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Spohn, An algebraic condition for the approach to equilibrium of an open N-level system, Lett

    H. Spohn, An algebraic condition for the approach to equilibrium of an open N-level system, Lett. Math. Phys.2, 33 (1977)

    work page 1977

  31. [31]

    Frigerio, Quantum dynamical semigroups and ap- proach to equilibrium, Lett

    A. Frigerio, Quantum dynamical semigroups and ap- proach to equilibrium, Lett. Math. Phys.2, 79 (1977)

    work page 1977

  32. [32]

    Frigerio, Stationary states of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun

    A. Frigerio, Stationary states of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys.63, 269 (1978)

    work page 1978

  33. [33]

    Spohn, Kinetic equations from Hamiltonian dynam- ics: Markovian limits, Rev

    H. Spohn, Kinetic equations from Hamiltonian dynam- ics: Markovian limits, Rev. Mod. Phys.52, 569 (1980)

    work page 1980

  34. [34]

    Fagnola and R

    F. Fagnola and R. Rebolledo, Subharmonic projections for a quantum Markov semigroup, J. Math. Phys.43, 1074 (2002)

    work page 2002

  35. [35]

    Baumgartner, H

    B. Baumgartner, H. Narnhofer, and W. Thirring, Anal- ysis of quantum semigroups with GKS–Lindblad gener- ators: I. Simple generators, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 065201 (2008)

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    Baumgartner and H

    B. Baumgartner and H. Narnhofer, Analysis of quantum semigroups with GKS–Lindblad generators: II. General, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41, 395303 (2008)

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    Nigro, On the uniqueness of the steady-state solution of the Lindblad–Gorini–Kossakowski–Sudarshan equa- tion, J

    D. Nigro, On the uniqueness of the steady-state solution of the Lindblad–Gorini–Kossakowski–Sudarshan equa- tion, J. Stat. Mech.2019, 043202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Amato, P

    D. Amato, P. Facchi, and A. Konderak, Asymptotics of quantum channels, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.56, 265304 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Yoshida, Uniqueness of steady states of Gorini- 24 Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad equations: A simple proof, Phys

    H. Yoshida, Uniqueness of steady states of Gorini- 24 Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad equations: A simple proof, Phys. Rev. A109, 022218 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Zhang and T

    Y. Zhang and T. Barthel, Criteria for Davies irreducibil- ity of Markovian quantum dynamics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.57, 115301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Amato and P

    D. Amato and P. Facchi, Number of steady states of quantum evolutions, Sci Rep14, 14366 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Seltmann and B

    M. Seltmann and B. Buˇ ca, UniqueNESS: Graph theory approach to the uniqueness of non-equilibrium station- ary states of the Lindblad master equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.59, 165203 (2026)

    work page 2026

  43. [43]

    Hamazaki, K

    R. Hamazaki, K. Mochizuki, H. Oshima, and Y. Fuji, An introduction to monitored quantum systems and quantum trajectories: Spectrum, typicality, and phases, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , ptag055 (2026)

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    Fagnola and F

    F. Fagnola and F. Girotti, Irreducibility of Quantum Markov Semigroups, uniqueness of invariant states and related properties (2025), arXiv:2512.11517 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Buˇ ca and T

    B. Buˇ ca and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: Transport in constrained open spin chains, New J. Phys.14, 073007 (2012)

    work page 2012

  46. [46]

    V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Buˇ ca, J

    B. Buˇ ca, J. Tindall, and D. Jaksch, Non-stationary co- herent quantum many-body dynamics through dissipa- tion, Nat. Commun.10, 1730 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Piccitto, M

    G. Piccitto, M. Wauters, F. Nori, and N. Shammah, Symmetries and conserved quantities of boundary time crystals in generalized spin models, Phys. Rev. B104, 014307 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Taheri, A

    H. Taheri, A. B. Matsko, L. Maleki, and K. Sacha, All- optical dissipative discrete time crystals, Nat Commun 13, 848 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Hajduˇ sek, P

    M. Hajduˇ sek, P. Solanki, R. Fazio, and S. Vinjanampa- thy, Seeding Crystallization in Time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 080603 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Prosen and E

    T. Prosen and E. Ilievski, Nonequilibrium Phase Tran- sition in a Periodically Driven X Y Spin Chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 060403 (2011)

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    Vorberg, W

    D. Vorberg, W. Wustmann, R. Ketzmerick, and A. Eckardt, Generalized Bose-Einstein Condensation into Multiple States in Driven-Dissipative Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 240405 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    Haddadfarshi, J

    F. Haddadfarshi, J. Cui, and F. Mintert, Completely Positive Approximate Solutions of Driven Open Quan- tum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 130402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    C. M. Dai, Z. C. Shi, and X. X. Yi, Floquet theorem with open systems and its applications, Phys. Rev. A 93, 032121 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Fitzpatrick, N

    M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Y. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a Dissipative Phase Transition in a One-Dimensional Circuit QED Lattice, Phys. Rev. X7, 011016 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Hartmann, D

    M. Hartmann, D. Poletti, M. Ivanchenko, S. Denisov, and P. H¨ anggi, Asymptotic Floquet states of open quan- tum systems: The role of interaction, New J. Phys.19, 083011 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    T. N. Ikeda and M. Sato, General description for nonequilibrium steady states in periodically driven dis- sipative quantum systems, Sci. Adv.6, eabb4019 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Schnell, A

    A. Schnell, A. Eckardt, and S. Denisov, Is there a Flo- quet Lindbladian?, Phys. Rev. B101, 100301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    G. P. Fedorov, S. V. Remizov, D. S. Shapiro, W. V. Pogosov, E. Egorova, I. Tsitsilin, M. Andronik, A. A. Dobronosova, I. A. Rodionov, O. V. Astafiev, and A. V. Ustinov, Photon Transport in a Bose-Hubbard Chain of Superconducting Artificial Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 180503 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Schnell, S

    A. Schnell, S. Denisov, and A. Eckardt, High-frequency expansions for time-periodic Lindblad generators, Phys. Rev. B104, 165414 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Mizuta, K

    K. Mizuta, K. Takasan, and N. Kawakami, Breakdown of Markovianity by interactions in stroboscopic Floquet- Lindblad dynamics under high-frequency drive, Phys. Rev. A103, L020202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Ikeda, K

    T. Ikeda, K. Chinzei, and M. Sato, Nonequilibrium steady states in the Floquet-Lindblad systems: Van Vleck’s high-frequency expansion approach, SciPost Phys. Core4, 033 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    Chen, Y.-M

    H. Chen, Y.-M. Hu, W. Zhang, M. A. Kurniawan, Y. Shao, X. Chen, A. Prem, and X. Dai, Periodically driven open quantum systems: Spectral properties and nonequilibrium steady states, Phys. Rev. B109, 184309 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Chinzei and T

    K. Chinzei and T. N. Ikeda, Time Crystals Protected by Floquet Dynamical Symmetry in Hubbard Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 060601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  65. [65]

    Ho, S.-I

    T.-S. Ho, S.-I. Chu, and J. V. Tietz, Semiclassical many- mode floquet theory, Chemical Physics Letters96, 464 (1983)

    work page 1983

  66. [66]

    Casati, I

    G. Casati, I. Guarneri, and D. L. Shepelyansky, Ander- son Transition in a One-Dimensional System with Three Incommensurate Frequencies, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 345 (1989)

    work page 1989

  67. [67]

    Martin, G

    I. Martin, G. Refael, and B. Halperin, Topological Fre- quency Conversion in Strongly Driven Quantum Sys- tems, Phys. Rev. X7, 041008 (2017)

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    Noviˇ cenko, E

    V. Noviˇ cenko, E. Anisimovas, and G. Juzeli¯ unas, Flo- quet analysis of a quantum system with modulated pe- riodic driving, Phys. Rev. A95, 023615 (2017)

    work page 2017

  69. [69]

    Cubero and F

    D. Cubero and F. Renzoni, Asymptotic theory of quasiperiodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E97, 062139 (2018)

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    H. Zhao, F. Mintert, and J. Knolle, Floquet Time Spirals and Stable Discrete Time Quasi-Crystals in Quasi-Periodically Driven Quantum Many-Body Sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B100, 134302 (2019)

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    Nathan, R

    F. Nathan, R. Ge, S. Gazit, M. Rudner, and M. Kolo- drubetz, Quasiperiodic Floquet-Thouless Energy Pump, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 166804 (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    Malz and A

    D. Malz and A. Smith, Topological two-dimensional Flo- quet lattice on a single superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 163602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    Beatrez, C

    W. Beatrez, C. Fleckenstein, A. Pillai, E. Sanchez, A. Akkiraju, J. Alcala, S. Conti, P. Reshetikhin, E. Druga, M. Bukov, and A. Ajoy, Observation of a critical prethermal discrete time crystal created by two-frequency driving, Nat. Phys.19, 407 (2023), arXiv:2201.02162 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    H. K. Park, J. Jeon, G. Y. Cho, and S. Lee, Control- lable Floquet edge modes in a multi-frequency driving system, Phys. Rev. B107, 085141 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    Roy and S

    K. Roy and S. Basu, Single and multifrequency driving protocols in a Rashba nanowire proximitized to an s - wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B110, 165403 (2024)

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    G. He, B. Ye, R. Gong, C. Yao, Z. Liu, K. W. Murch, 25 N. Y. Yao, and C. Zu, Experimental Realization of Dis- crete Time Quasi-Crystals, Phys. Rev. X15, 011055 (2025)

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    Maity, U

    S. Maity, U. Bhattacharya, A. Dutta, and D. Sen, Fi- bonacci steady states in a driven integrable quantum system, Phys. Rev. B99, 020306 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    Lapierre, K

    B. Lapierre, K. Choo, A. Tiwari, C. Tauber, T. Neu- pert, and R. Chitra, The fine structure of heating in a quasiperiodically driven critical quantum system, Phys. Rev. Research2, 033461 (2020)

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    Pilatowsky-Cameo, C

    S. Pilatowsky-Cameo, C. B. Dag, W. W. Ho, and S. Choi, Complete Hilbert-Space Ergodicity in Quan- tum Dynamics of Generalized Fibonacci Drives, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 250401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  80. [80]

    T. Mori, H. Zhao, F. Mintert, J. Knolle, and R. Moess- ner, Rigorous Bounds on the Heating Rate in Thue- Morse Quasiperiodically and Randomly Driven Quan- tum Many-Body Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 050602 (2021)

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.