Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 40 references

The small Deborah number limit for the compressible fluid-particle flows

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For sufficiently small Deborah number, the coupled Vlasov–Fokker–Planck and compressible Navier–Stokes system has global smooth solutions that converge pointwise to the Navier–Stokes–Smoluchowski system at rate O(ε), with an explicitly iden

desk verdict The main pointwise-limit theorem is likely fixable but not currently supported: the hypotheses only control u_in0 and h_in0 in H^5, while Proposition 1.1, the source of the limiting NSS solution, requires H^6 smallness for both. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.14412 v2 pith:LLVV5D3Z submitted 2026-02-16 math.AP

Zhendong Fang , Kunlun Qi , Huanyao Wen This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q9935B2535Q3035B4082C4076N10
keywords DeborahnumberVlasov-Fokker-PlanckcompressibleNavier-StokesNavier-Stokes-SmoluchowskihydrodynamiclimitHilbertexpansionmacro-microdecompositionpointwiseconvergence
topics Navier-Stokes Regularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that in the light-particle scaling where the Deborah number is ε², the kinetic-fluid system made of a Vlasov–Fokker–Planck equation and the compressible Navier–Stokes equations has a unique global-in-time smooth solution for small prepared data, and that solution converges pointwise to the limiting Navier–Stokes–Smoluchowski model with explicit rate O(ε). This is stronger than previous derivations via relative entropy, which only delivered weak convergence without a rate. The proof constructs a Hilbert expansion around the limiting solution and controls the remainder by refined energy estimates using macro-micro decomposition; a new expansion form absorbs the singular pressure interaction of the compressible case. A sympathetic reader should care because the theorem turns the two-phase model into a quantitatively reliable approximation of the reduced Smoluchowski description whenever particle response is fast.

What carries the argument

The expansion ansatz (1.15)/(1.17) — writing (fε,uε,ρε) as the limiting NSS state plus ε times remainder (g,u,ρ), with fε expanded around the local Maxwellian and an explicit first-order kinetic term — combined with the remainder system (3.2). The argument is carried by the total energy E(t) and dissipation D(t) in (3.9), which separate macroscopic contributions from the limiting solution and microscopic contributions from the remainder. The estimates use the coercivity of the linearized Fokker–Planck operator on the microscopic part, the velocity projection P, and Lemma 3.1 to control the singular pressure difference ε⁻¹[P(1+h0+ερ)-P(1+h0)] by expanding before applying Taylor expansions.

What would settle it

Construct small H^6 initial data for the limiting Navier–Stokes–Smoluchowski system for which the claimed dissipation estimate (1.13) fails — e.g., finite-time blow-up in H^6 while the theorem's smallness conditions hold. The Hilbert expansion and macro energy estimate would then collapse. Alternatively, a direct numerical simulation of (1.4) with prepared data (1.16) showing sup-norm errors that do not decrease like ε would falsify the pointwise rate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is Theorem 1.1 with Corollary 1.1: for every ε∈(0,ε0], under smallness of prepared initial data (1.19), the scaled VFP-CNS system (1.4) admits a unique global solution of the expansion form (1.17), and the pointwise bound (1.23) holds: |fε(t,x,v)-(1+m0(t,x))M(v)| + |uε(t,x)-u0(t,x)| + |ρε(t,x)-(1+h0(t,x))| ≲ ε, uniformly for all times and positions. The leading particle distribution is the Maxwellian with amplitude 1+m0, and the first-order kinetic correction is explicitly (v·u0(1+m0)-v·∇m0)M. The proof reduces convergence to a uniform energy estimate for the remainder system (3.2), closing with the dissipation structure built from macro-micro decomposition.

Load-bearing premise

The proof rests on Proposition 1.1, which assumes that the limiting Navier–Stokes–Smoluchowski system admits a unique global-in-time H^6 solution with dissipation estimate (1.13); the paper does not prove this proposition, but says it follows by a similar argument as an existing H^3 result, so the required high-regularity well-posedness is a load-bearing premise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For each sufficiently small ε, the VFP-CNS system has a unique global smooth solution near equilibrium in the singular light-particle scaling, extending local and weak-solution theory to this regime.
  • The reduced NSS model is a reliable pointwise approximation: density, velocity, and particle concentration differ from their limits by at most O(ε), uniformly in time and space.
  • The explicit first-order kinetic correction (v·u0(1+m0)-v·∇m0)M is available for constructing better initial data and moment closures for kinetic-fluid simulations.
  • Global-in-time remainder bounds mean the approximation quality does not degrade as t grows; in particular, the O(ε) pointwise error persists for all time.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The strategy of expanding before Taylor-expanding the pressure term (Lemma 3.1) is portable to other kinetic-fluid limits with stronger pressure singularities, such as density-dependent viscosity or non-isentropic fluids.
  • The H^6 regularity of Proposition 1.1 is likely far above the critical threshold; if the limiting NSS system were proved well-posed at lower regularity, the smallness and smoothness assumptions on prepared data could be relaxed while preserving pointwise convergence via lower-order Sobolev embeddings.
  • A numerical check of the O(ε) rate with the prepared initial data (1.16) could reveal whether the rate is sharp or whether a refined expansion yields O(ε²); that would test the optimality of the chosen ansatz.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the scaled Vlasov-Fokker-Planck/compressible Navier-Stokes system (1.4) in the light-particle regime De=ε^2, Ma=ε, and formally derives the Navier-Stokes-Smoluchowski limit (1.6) by a Hilbert expansion. The main result, Theorem 1.1, asserts that for small prepared data of the special form (1.16) satisfying (1.19), the VFP-CNS system admits a unique global solution in the expansion form (1.17), with the remainder controlled by the energy inequality (1.20). Corollary 1.1 then gives pointwise O(ε) convergence to the NSS solution. The proof is based on a macro-micro decomposition and a refined multi-layer energy/dissipation estimate for the remainder system, combining kinetic coercivity, fluid estimates, and the NSS a priori energy (1.13).

Significance. If the result is correct, it is a substantial improvement over the relative-entropy arguments of Mellet-Vasseur, yielding pointwise convergence with an explicit rate for a compressible fluid-particle model. The formal derivation is transparent and the energy architecture is detailed. However, the main theorem currently depends on an H^6 well-posedness statement for the NSS system that is not proved in the paper, and the data condition in Theorem 1.1 is weaker than what that statement requires. These are essential gaps, but they appear fixable by strengthening the hypotheses or supplying the missing well-posedness proof.

major comments (2)
  1. [§1.4, Eq. (1.19), Prop. 1.1] The hypotheses of Theorem 1.1 are insufficient to invoke Proposition 1.1. Proposition 1.1 requires (m_0^in,u_0^in,h_0^in) ∈ H^6_x × H^6_x × H^6_x with H^6-smallness ≤ δ0, while (1.19) controls only ∥m_0^in∥_{H^6} + ∥(u_0^in,h_0^in)∥_{H^5} ≤ δ. H^5-smallness does not imply H^6-smallness. Moreover, D_ma(t) in (3.6) contains ∥∇u0∥^2_{H^5} = ∥u0∥^2_{H^6}, and Step 3 of the proof of Proposition 3.2 uses (1.13), so the energy argument needs u0 ∈ H^6. Thus the proof of Theorem 1.1 cannot start for data satisfying only (1.19). The fix is either to require ∥(m_0^in,u_0^in,h_0^in)∥^2_{H^6_x} ≤ δ with δ ≤ δ0, or to prove and use a version of Proposition 1.1 at lower regularity with an adapted D_ma.
  2. [Prop. 1.1 and Remark 1.1] Proposition 1.1 is a load-bearing input: it supplies the NSS solution used in the Hilbert expansion, the macro estimates used throughout Section 3, and the dissipation inequality (1.13) used in Step 3 of the proof of Proposition 3.2. The proposition is not proved; Remark 1.1 only says it follows by a similar argument as in [14], which the remark itself identifies as an H^3-level result. The H^6 statement with the precise dissipation (1.13) is not a direct corollary of [14] as far as the manuscript demonstrates. Please provide a full proof or a precise reference for the H^6 well-posedness, or weaken the regularity demands of the paper. As written, this is a gap in the proof of the main theorem.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1.4, Eq. (1.18)] The claimed regularity g ∈ L^2([0,∞);H^5_{x,v}) is not supported by the energy inequality (1.20) and the dissipation D(t) in (1.22), which control (I−P)g only up to total order 4 and u,ρ in H^4_x. Either weaken (1.18) to H^4_{x,v} or provide the missing estimate for the fifth-order derivatives.
  2. [§3.4, Step 4] The choice of λ4 is stated as C8 λ4/2 ≥ C4, but after Step 3 the relevant constant is C9, not C8. This appears to be a typo; please correct the notation.
  3. [Prop. 3.1] The proof of local well-posedness for the remainder system is only a reference to [27,30]. Given the singular 1/ε terms and the mixed H^4_{x,v} setting, please include a brief sketch of the contraction argument and the dependence of T_ε on the initial norm.
  4. [Remark 1.2] The statement that δ is 'usually larger' than δ0 is confusing and seems inconsistent with the need to invoke Proposition 1.1, whose smallness threshold is δ0. Clarify the relation between δ and δ0 and ensure that the theorem's hypotheses imply the NSS well-posedness hypotheses.
  5. [§3.1, Eq. (3.1)] The definition of ρ in (3.1) is garbled by typesetting; it should read ρ=(ρ^ε−ρ0)/ε. Please correct the displayed formula.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the Hilbert-expansion derivation and remainder energy estimates are self-contained, with only a non-load-bearing self-citation and a separate H5/H6 hypothesis mismatch.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The limiting NSS system (1.6) is obtained in Section 2 by inserting the Hilbert expansion (2.1) into the scaled VFP-CNS system and collecting orders in epsilon; the limiting equations are independent of the remainder estimates. The remainder system (3.2) is then derived by subtracting the NSS profiles from the exact equations, and the energy estimates in Section 3 prove that the remainder (g,u,rho) is small without assuming the target pointwise convergence. The closing bootstrap (Section 4.1) is a standard continuity argument, not a logical circle. Proposition 1.1, which supplies the NSS solution used in the ansatz, is an external input (Remark 1.1 refers to [14], not to the present authors) and does not encode the theorem's conclusion. The coercivity estimate (1.11) and the local well-posedness of the remainder system are imported from external references. The self-citation [21] is descriptive and non-load-bearing. Separately, I flag a non-circular correctness issue: Theorem 1.1's hypothesis (1.19) controls only (u_in0,h_in0) in H^5_x, while Proposition 1.1(ii) requires H^6_x and D_ma(t) in (3.6) contains ||∇u0||^2_{H^5_x}; if taken literally, the theorem's hypotheses are insufficient to invoke Proposition 1.1. This is an internal hypothesis mismatch, not an instance of the conclusion being assumed or fitted, so it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No empirical data or model parameters are fit. The proof introduces technical constants whose exact values are irrelevant. The main background assumptions are the light-particle scaling, prepared initial data, imported well-posedness theorems, and standard coercivity/Sobolev facts.

free parameters (1)
  • Lyapunov weights λ1..λ6 and smallness thresholds δ, δ1, ε0
    Proof constants chosen sufficiently large/small in §3.4 to absorb error terms and close the energy estimate. They are not fitted to data and carry no physical predictive content.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Global H^6 well-posedness of the NSS limit with dissipation estimate (1.13), as stated in Proposition 1.1 and attributed to [14] in Remark 1.1.
    Load-bearing: the Hilbert expansion is built around this solution, and the macro energy is controlled by it. Not proved in the paper.
  • domain assumption Local well-posedness of the remainder system (Proposition 3.1) via a contraction mapping argument, referred to [27,30].
    Provides the local solutions that are extended globally; proof is outsourced.
  • domain assumption A priori smallness assumption (3.11): sup_{0≤t≤T}(∥g∥^2_{H^4} + ∥(u,ρ)∥^2_{H^4}) ≤ δ_1.
    Used to close the nonlinear energy estimate; propagated in Section 4 by a continuity argument.
  • domain assumption Scaling regime (1.3): χ=1, Ma=ε, Re=1, De=ε^2, ρ_P/ρ_F=ε^2.
    Defines the light-particle asymptotic regime under study; all results are conditional on this scaling.
  • domain assumption Initial data have the exact expansion form (1.16) matching the first-order Hilbert profile.
    The theorem only covers prepared data; general initial data would require initial-layer corrections.
  • standard math Coercivity of the linearized Fokker-Planck operator, inequality (1.11), cited from [10].
    Used throughout the kinetic estimates to turn Lg into dissipation of (I−P)g and b.
  • standard math Sobolev embedding H^2↪L^∞.
    Used in Corollary 1.1 to convert the H^2_xH^2_v energy bounds into pointwise convergence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The small Deborah number limit for the compressible fluid-particle flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LLVV5D3Z

@misc{pith2026260214412,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The small Deborah number limit for the compressible fluid-particle flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LLVV5D3Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.14412}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we consider the hydrodynamic limit for the fluid-particle flows governed by the Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equation coupled with the compressible Navier-Stokes equation as the Deborah number tends to zero. The proof is based on a formal derivation via the Hilbert expansion around the limiting system, the rigorous justification of which is completed by the refined energy estimates involving the macro-micro decomposition. Compared with the existing results obtained by the relative entropy argument ([A. Mellet and A. F. Vasseur, Comm. Math. Phys., 281 (2008), pp. 573-596]), the present work extends to a pointwise convergence of the hydrodynamic limits with an explicit rate for the fluid-particle coupled model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references

  1. [14]

    S. Ding, B. Huang, and Q. Li , Global existence and decay estimates for the classical solutions to a compressible fluid-particle interaction model , Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B (Engl. Ed.), 39 (2019), pp. 1525--1537

    2019

  2. [1]

    Ballew , Mathematical topics in fluid-particle interaction , ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2014

    J. Ballew , Mathematical topics in fluid-particle interaction , ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2014. Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park

    2014

  3. [2]

    height 2pt depth -1.6pt width 23pt, Asymptotic analysis for a homogeneous bubbling regime V lasov- F okker- P lanck/ N avier- S tokes system , Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 71 (2020), pp. Paper No. 131, 22

    2020

  4. [3]

    Baranger, L

    C. Baranger, L. Boudin, P.-E. Jabin, and S. Mancini , A modeling of biospray for the upper airways , in C EMRACS 2004---mathematics and applications to biology and medicine, vol. 14 of ESAIM Proc., EDP Sci., Les Ulis, 2005, pp. 41--47

    2004

  5. [4]

    Berres, R

    S. Berres, R. B\" u rger, K. H. Karlsen, and E. M. Tory , Strongly degenerate parabolic-hyperbolic systems modeling polydisperse sedimentation with compression , SIAM J. Appl. Math., 64 (2003), pp. 41--80

    2003

  6. [5]

    Bolliat, C

    G. Bolliat, C. M. Dafermos, P. D. Lax, and T. P. Liu , Recent mathematical methods in nonlinear wave propagation , vol. 1640 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin; Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo (C.I.M.E.), Florence, 1996. Lectures given at the 1st C.I.M.E. Session held in Montecatini Terme, May 23--31, 1994, Fondazione CIME/CI...

    1996

  7. [6]

    Bresch, P

    D. Bresch, P. B. Mucha, and E. Zatorska , Finite-energy solutions for compressible two-fluid Stokes system Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 232 (2019), no. 2, 987–1029

    2019

  8. [7]

    Caflisch and G

    R. Caflisch and G. C. Papanicolaou , Dynamic theory of suspensions with B rownian effects , SIAM J. Appl. Math., 43 (1983), pp. 885--906

    1983

Show all 40 references
  1. [8]

    R. E. Caflisch , The fluid dynamic limit of the nonlinear B oltzmann equation , Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 33 (1980), pp. 651--666

    1980

  2. [9]

    J. A. Carrillo, Y.-P. Choi, and T. K. Karper , On the analysis of a coupled kinetic-fluid model with local alignment forces , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\' e C Anal. Non Lin\' e aire, 33 (2016), pp. 273--307

    2016

  3. [10]

    J. A. Carrillo, R. Duan, and A. Moussa , Global classical solutions close to equilibrium to the V lasov- F okker- P lanck- E uler system , Kinet. Relat. Models, 4 (2011), pp. 227--258

    2011

  4. [11]

    J. A. Carrillo and T. Goudon , Stability and asymptotic analysis of a fluid-particle interaction model , Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 31 (2006), pp. 1349--1379

    2006

  5. [12]

    J. A. Carrillo , T. K. Karper, and K. Trivisa , On the dynamics of a fluid-particle interaction model: the bubbling regime , Nonlinear Anal., 74 (2011), pp. 2778--2801

    2011

  6. [13]

    Choi and J

    Y.-P. Choi and J. Jung , Asymptotic analysis for V lasov- F okker- P lanck/compressible N avier- S tokes equations with a density-dependent viscosity , in Hyperbolic problems: theory, numerics, applications, vol. 10 of AIMS Ser. Appl. Math., Am. Inst. Math. Sci. (AIMS), Spring...

    2020

  7. [15]

    S. Ding, B. Huang, and H. Wen , Global well-posedness of classical solutions to a fluid-particle interaction model in R ^3 , J. Differential Equations, 263 (2017), pp. 8666--8717

    2017

  8. [16]

    R. Duan, M. Fornasier, and G. Toscani , A kinetic flocking model with diffusion , Comm. Math. Phys., 300 (2010), pp. 95--145

    2010

  9. [17]

    Duan and S

    R. Duan and S. Liu , Cauchy problem on the V lasov- F okker- P lanck equation coupled with the compressible E uler equations through the friction force , Kinet. Relat. Models, 6 (2013), pp. 687--700

    2013

  10. [18]

    Evje, and K.H

    S. Evje, and K.H. Karlsen , Global existence of weak solutions for a viscous two-phase model , J. Differential Equations 245 (2008), no. 9, pp.2660--2703

    2008

  11. [19]

    S. Evje, H. Wen, and C. Zhu , On global solutions to the viscous liquid-gas model with unconstrained transition to single-phase flow , Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 27 (2017), no. 2, pp.323--346

    2017

  12. [20]

    D. Fang, R. Zi, and T. Zhang , Global classical large solutions to a 1 D fluid-particle interaction model: the bubbling regime , J. Math. Phys., 53 (2012), pp. 033706, 21

    2012

  13. [21]

    Z. Fang, K. Qi, and H. Wen , The small deborah number limit for the fluid-particle flows: incompressible case , Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 34 (2024), pp. 2265--2304

    2024

  14. [22]

    Goudon, P.-E

    T. Goudon, P.-E. Jabin, and A. Vasseur , Hydrodynamic limit for the V lasov- N avier- S tokes equations. I . L ight particles regime , Indiana Univ. Math. J., 53 (2004), pp. 1495--1515

    2004

  15. [23]

    height 2pt depth -1.6pt width 23pt, Hydrodynamic limit for the V lasov- N avier- S tokes equations. II . F ine particles regime , Indiana Univ. Math. J., 53 (2004), pp. 1517--1536

    2004

  16. [24]

    Huang, S

    B. Huang, S. Ding, and H. Wen , Local classical solutions of compressible N avier- S tokes- S moluchowski equations with vacuum , Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 9 (2016), pp. 1717--1752

    2016

  17. [25]

    Kalousek, S

    M. Kalousek, S. Mitra, S. Necasova , The existence of a weak solution for a compressible multicomponent fluid structure interaction problem , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 184 (2024), pp. 118--189

    2024

  18. [26]

    R. R. Huilgol , On the concept of the D eborah number , Trans. Soc. Rheol., 19 (1975), pp. 297--306

    1975

  19. [27]

    F. Li, Y. Mu, and D. Wang , Strong solutions to the compressible N avier- S tokes- V lasov- F okker- P lanck equations: global existence near the equilibrium and large time behavior , SIAM J. Math. Anal., 49 (2017), pp. 984--1026

    2017

  20. [28]

    H.-L. Li, S. Liu, and T. Yang , The N avier- S tokes- V lasov- F okker- P lanck system in bounded domains , J. Stat. Phys., 186 (2022), pp. Paper No. 42, 32

    2022

  21. [29]

    Lions , Mathematical topics in fluid mechanics

    P.-L. Lions , Mathematical topics in fluid mechanics. V ol. 2 , vol. 10 of Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applications, The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1998. Compressible models, Oxford Science Publications

    1998

  22. [30]

    Matsumura and T

    A. Matsumura and T. Nishida , Initial-boundary value problems for the equations of motion of compressible viscous and heat-conductive fluids , Comm. Math. Phys., 89 (1983), pp. 445--464

    1983

  23. [31]

    Mellet and A

    A. Mellet and A. F. Vasseur , Global weak solutions for a V lasov- F okker- P lanck/ N avier- S tokes system of equations , Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 17 (2007), pp. 1039--1063

    2007

  24. [32]

    height 2pt depth -1.6pt width 23pt, Asymptotic analysis for a V lasov- F okker- P lanck/compressible N avier- S tokes system of equations , Comm. Math. Phys., 281 (2008), pp. 573--596

    2008

  25. [33]

    Mu and D

    Y. Mu and D. Wang , Global well-posedness and optimal large-time behavior of strong solutions to the non-isentropic particle-fluid flows , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 59 (2020), pp. Paper No. 110, 42

    2020

  26. [34]

    Novotny, and M

    A. Novotny, and M. Pokorny , Weak solutions for some compressible multicomponent fluid models , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 235 (2020), no. 1, pp.355--403

    2020

  27. [35]

    Sone , Molecular gas dynamics , Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology, Birkh\" a user Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2007

    Y. Sone , Molecular gas dynamics , Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology, Birkh\" a user Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2007. Theory, techniques, and applications

    2007

  28. [36]

    Vasseur, H

    A. Vasseur, H. Wen, and C. Yu , Global weak solution to the viscous two-fluid model with finite energy , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 125 (2019), pp. 247--282

    2019

  29. [37]

    Wen , On global solutions to a viscous compressible two-fluid model with unconstrained transition to single-phase flow in three dimensions , Calc

    H. Wen , On global solutions to a viscous compressible two-fluid model with unconstrained transition to single-phase flow in three dimensions , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 60 (2021), pp. 247--282

    2021

  30. [38]

    Wang and C

    D. Wang and C. Yu , Global weak solution to the inhomogeneous N avier- S tokes- V lasov equations , J. Differential Equations, 259 (2015), pp. 3976--4008

    2015

  31. [39]

    F. A. Williams , Combustion Theory , The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, 2 ed., 1985

    1985

  32. [40]

    Yu , Global weak solutions to the incompressible N avier- S tokes- V lasov equations , J

    C. Yu , Global weak solutions to the incompressible N avier- S tokes- V lasov equations , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 100 (2013), pp. 275--293

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.