pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.15960 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-17 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Novel Constraints on Spin-Dependent Light Dark Matter Scattering

Alexander Clarke , Maxim Pospelov
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 21:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords dark matterspin-dependent interactionsSNOreactor productiondeuteron disintegrationlight dark mattercross section constraintsneutral current
0
0 comments X

The pith

SNO data excludes spin-dependent dark matter-nucleon cross sections above 10^{-33} cm² for masses below 1.5 MeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that light dark matter particles can be produced in pairs inside heavy-water nuclear reactors through neutron capture on deuterium, and that the resulting particles are energetic enough to break apart deuterons when they reach the SNO detector. This process would increase the neutral-current signal that SNO measures from solar neutrinos, allowing the existing data to set new upper limits on the strength of spin-dependent dark matter interactions. A reader cares because the approach uses an already-running neutrino observatory and a standard reactor reaction to probe a mass range where conventional direct-detection experiments lose sensitivity. If the limits hold, they close off a slice of parameter space for light spin-dependent dark matter that had remained open.

Core claim

Pair production of MeV-scale dark matter via the D(n, χ χ-bar)^3He reaction occurs inside CANDU reactors; a fraction of the produced particles exceed the threshold for deuteron disintegration D(χ, χ)np inside SNO, adding to the neutral-current rate. Comparing the expected addition to the measured SNO rate yields an upper bound σ_χp ≲ 10^{-33} cm² for m_χ ≤ 1.5 MeV. An analogous process in the Sun gives a weaker bound around 10^{-37} cm² in the kinematically allowed region, while small near detectors at reactors yield only subdominant sensitivity via coherent nuclear recoil.

What carries the argument

The D(n, χ χ-bar)^3He reaction, which produces dark-matter pairs with sufficient energy to trigger deuteron breakup at SNO and thereby augment the neutral-current deuteron-disintegration signal.

If this is right

  • Cross sections larger than ~10^{-33} cm² are ruled out for dark-matter masses up to 1.5 MeV.
  • Solar production supplies an independent but weaker constraint near 10^{-37} cm² wherever kinematics allow.
  • Small detectors placed near CANDU reactors have lower reach than the SNO-based limit for this interaction channel.
  • The method demonstrates that reactor neutrino facilities can serve as production sites for light dark matter searches.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Improved modeling of SNO backgrounds could tighten the bound without new hardware.
  • The same production channel could be studied at other heavy-water reactors or with future neutrino detectors.
  • Light dark matter searches may benefit from combining reactor flux calculations with underground neutral-current measurements.
  • If the bound is robust, it motivates dedicated calculations of reactor dark-matter spectra for other detector technologies.

Load-bearing premise

That the dominant source of any extra deuteron-disintegration events at SNO is dark matter produced in the D(n, χ χ-bar)^3He channel and that backgrounds and detector efficiencies are modeled correctly.

What would settle it

A re-analysis of SNO neutral-current data that finds the observed rate fully consistent with solar neutrinos alone, with no room for an additional contribution at the level predicted for cross sections near 10^{-33} cm².

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.15960 by Alexander Clarke, Maxim Pospelov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A not-to-scale depiction of emission/detection scheme [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Energy distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Mass dependence of branching ratios to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The slanted shape of the exclusion line is the di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Flux-averaged deuteron disintegration cross sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Excluded regions on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We explore the sensitivity of the SNO experiment to light dark matter particles $\chi$ with spin-dependent interactions with nucleons. We show that the pair-production of MeV scale dark matter is possible in heavy water (CANDU) reactors via ${\rm D}(n,\chi\bar\chi)^3{\rm He}$, and calculate the expected rate within the simplest models of $\chi$-nucleon interactions. %Heavy water nuclear reactors serve as an excellent production method for spin-dependent dark matter. Owing to a sizable $Q$-value for this reaction, a large fraction of DM particles produced this way are above the threshold for deuteron disintegration, ${\rm D}(\chi,\chi)np$, which adds to the SNO neutral current signal. Evaluating the CANDU-to-SNO scheme for the production and detection of DM, we derive novel constraints for the $\chi$-nucleon spin-dependent cross sections, showing that cross sections above $\sigma_{\chi p} \sim 10^{-33}\,{\rm cm}^{2}$ are generally excluded if $m_\chi \leq1.5$\,MeV. An isospin-mirror reaction will occur in the Sun, and for the kinematically allowed region it excludes a portion of parameter space with cross sections on the order $10^{-37}\,{\rm cm}^{2}$. We also evaluate the potential sensitivity of small ``near" detectors placed in close proximity to a CANDU reactor to search for a coherent nuclear recoil, finding subdominant sensitivity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes pair production of light spin-dependent dark matter χ in CANDU reactors via the reaction D(n, χχ̄)^3He, followed by χ-induced deuteron breakup D(χ,χ)np that augments the SNO neutral-current signal. From the resulting flux and SNO data it derives an exclusion σ_χp ≳ 10^{-33} cm² for m_χ ≤ 1.5 MeV, with a weaker solar constraint at ~10^{-37} cm² and a subdominant projection for near-reactor coherent-recoil detectors.

Significance. A valid result would furnish novel reactor- and solar-based limits on spin-dependent DM-nucleon scattering in the sub-MeV mass window, complementing existing direct-detection and beam-dump bounds.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and production section] Abstract and §2 (production mechanism): the reaction D(n, χχ̄)^3He violates charge conservation. The initial state has total charge Z = 1 (deuteron Z = 1 + neutron Z = 0), while the final state has Z = 2 from ^3He with no compensating charged particle or DM charge introduced. This renders the predicted DM flux identically zero, so the headline exclusion cannot be obtained.
  2. [SNO analysis section] §3 (SNO analysis): the numerical limit σ_χp ∼ 10^{-33} cm² is quoted without explicit background-subtraction procedure, detection efficiency, or error propagation for the added NC deuteron-disintegration events. The claim therefore rests on an incompletely documented subtraction from the published SNO NC rate.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation] Notation for the spin-dependent cross section is introduced as σ_χp but later referenced inconsistently; a single symbol and definition should be used throughout.
  2. [Solar constraint paragraph] The isospin-mirror solar reaction is mentioned only briefly; a short kinematic or rate comparison table would clarify why its reach is three orders of magnitude weaker.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for identifying the critical issues raised in the report. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and production section] Abstract and §2 (production mechanism): the reaction D(n, χχ̄)^3He violates charge conservation. The initial state has total charge Z = 1 (deuteron Z = 1 + neutron Z = 0), while the final state has Z = 2 from ^3He with no compensating charged particle or DM charge introduced. This renders the predicted DM flux identically zero, so the headline exclusion cannot be obtained.

    Authors: We agree that the reaction D(n, χχ̄)^3He as written violates charge conservation: the initial state (deuteron + neutron) has total electric charge +1 while the final state (^3He + χχ̄) has charge +2 assuming neutral DM. This was an error in the proposed production mechanism, which invalidates the predicted DM flux and the associated exclusion limits derived from the CANDU-to-SNO channel. We will revise the manuscript to remove all references to this reaction, the resulting DM flux calculation, and the headline constraint σ_χp ≳ 10^{-33} cm². We are examining whether any alternative, charge-conserving production channels exist for light spin-dependent DM in reactors, but no such mechanism is currently identified in the work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [SNO analysis section] §3 (SNO analysis): the numerical limit σ_χp ∼ 10^{-33} cm² is quoted without explicit background-subtraction procedure, detection efficiency, or error propagation for the added NC deuteron-disintegration events. The claim therefore rests on an incompletely documented subtraction from the published SNO NC rate.

    Authors: We acknowledge that §3 lacked sufficient detail on the background subtraction, detection efficiency, and error propagation for the additional neutral-current events. In the revised manuscript we will expand this section to explicitly describe the procedure for subtracting the standard SNO NC rate, the efficiency for detecting the DM-induced deuteron breakup events, and the full propagation of statistical and systematic uncertainties into the quoted cross-section limit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: constraints derived from external data and standard rates

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain calculates DM production via the stated reactor reaction and subsequent detection in SNO using standard nuclear reaction rates, external CANDU flux estimates, and SNO neutral-current data. No equation or result reduces by construction to a fitted parameter from the same dataset, a self-referential definition, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The excluded cross-section value is obtained by comparing predicted signal addition against external benchmarks rather than internal fitting, rendering the central claim independent of its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard nuclear and particle-physics inputs without additional free parameters beyond the DM mass and cross section being constrained; the DM particle itself is postulated but carries no independent evidence within the paper.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard nuclear reaction rates and Q-values for D(n,3He) and related channels
    Invoked to compute the DM pair-production rate in the reactor.
  • domain assumption Spin-dependent χ-nucleon interaction operator in the simplest models
    Used to calculate both production and detection cross sections.
invented entities (1)
  • light dark matter particle χ no independent evidence
    purpose: To serve as a spin-dependent DM candidate produced in reactors and detected via deuteron breakup
    Postulated to explain the search; no independent evidence or falsifiable prediction outside the paper is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5566 in / 1266 out tokens · 24938 ms · 2026-05-15T21:24:57.851853+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    cumulative

    Forℓ col,r=0 = 3×10 −3R⊙, the probability for fewer than 80 collision drops below 10 −3. Therefore,ℓ col,r=0 = 5×10 −3R⊙ reasonably determines the minimum colli- sion length and the maximum cross section that can be probed, which we conservatively evaluate at the highest energy point,Q−m χ, whereQ=Q(R4) = 5.49 MeV. Taking the number density of protons in ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Particle dark mat- ter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Physics Re- ports405, 279 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg, Cosmological Lower Bound on Heavy Neutrino Masses, Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 165 (1977)

    work page 1977

  4. [4]

    T. K. Buiet al.(TESSERACT), First Limits on Light Dark Matter Interactions in a Low Threshold Two- Channel Athermal Phonon Detector from the TESSER- ACT Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 161002 (2025), arXiv:2503.03683 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Novel direct detection constraints on light dark matter

    T. Bringmann and M. Pospelov, Novel direct detection constraints on light dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 171801 (2019), arXiv:1810.10543 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Probing sub-GeV Dark Matter with conventional detectors

    C. Kouvaris and J. Pradler, Probing sub-GeV Dark Mat- ter with conventional detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 031803 (2017), arXiv:1607.01789 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    M. Ibe, W. Nakano, Y. Shoji, and K. Suzuki, Migdal Ef- fect in Dark Matter Direct Detection Experiments, JHEP 03, 194, arXiv:1707.07258 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Neutralino Inelastic Scattering with Subsequent Detection of Nuclear Gamma Rays

    J. Engel and P. Vogel, Neutralino inelastic scattering with subsequent detection of nuclear gamma-rays, Phys. Rev. D61, 063503 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9910409

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  9. [9]

    Neutrino Physics with Dark Matter Experiments and the Signature of New Baryonic Neutral Currents

    M. Pospelov, Neutrino Physics with Dark Matter Exper- iments and the Signature of New Baryonic Neutral Cur- rents, Phys. Rev. D84, 085008 (2011), arXiv:1103.3261 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  10. [10]

    Signatures of Dark Matter Scattering Inelastically Off Nuclei

    L. Baudis, G. Kessler, P. Klos, R. F. Lang, J. Men´ endez, S. Reichard, and A. Schwenk, Signatures of Dark Mat- ter Scattering Inelastically Off Nuclei, Phys. Rev. D88, 115014 (2013), arXiv:1309.0825 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    Dutta, W.-C

    B. Dutta, W.-C. Huang, and J. L. Newstead, Probing the Dark Sector with Nuclear Transition Photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 111801 (2023), arXiv:2302.10250 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    C. Bird, P. Jackson, R. V. Kowalewski, and M. Pospelov, Search for dark matter in b —>s transitions with missing energy, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 201803 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0401195

    work page arXiv 2004

  13. [13]

    S. N. Gninenko, N. V. Krasnikov, and V. A. Matveev, Muon g-2 and searches for a new leptophobic sub-GeV dark boson in a missing-energy experiment at CERN, Phys. Rev. D91, 095015 (2015), arXiv:1412.1400 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Testing GeV-Scale Dark Matter with Fixed-Target Missing Momentum Experiments

    E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Test- ing GeV-Scale Dark Matter with Fixed-Target Miss- ing Momentum Experiments, Phys. Rev. D91, 094026 (2015), arXiv:1411.1404 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    Exploring Portals to a Hidden Sector Through Fixed Targets

    B. Batell, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Exploring Portals to a Hidden Sector Through Fixed Targets, Phys. Rev. D80, 095024 (2009), arXiv:0906.5614 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [16]

    New Electron Beam-Dump Experiments to Search for MeV to few-GeV Dark Matter

    E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, New Electron Beam-Dump Experiments to Search for MeV to few-GeV Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D88, 114015 (2013), arXiv:1307.6554 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  17. [17]

    Strong Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark Matter from SLAC Beam Dump E137

    B. Batell, R. Essig, and Z. Surujon, Strong Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark Sectors from SLAC Beam Dump E137, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 171802 (2014), arXiv:1406.2698 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    Brdar, B

    V. Brdar, B. Dutta, W. Jang, D. Kim, I. M. Shoemaker, Z. Tabrizi, A. Thompson, and J. Yu, Axionlike Particles at Future Neutrino Experiments: Closing the Cosmo- logical Triangle, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 201801 (2021), arXiv:2011.07054 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    B. J. Parket al.(NEON), New Constraints on Axionlike Particles with the NEON Detector at a Nuclear Reactor, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 201002 (2025), arXiv:2406.06117 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    A. A. Aguilar-Arevaloet al.(CONNIE, Atucha-II), Search for Reactor-Produced Millicharged Particles with Skipper-CCDs at the CONNIE and Atucha-II Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 071801 (2025), arXiv:2405.16316 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Gao and M

    T. Gao and M. Pospelov, Constraints on mil- licharged particles from nuclear gamma-decays (2025), arXiv:2507.17955 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Direct observation of coherent elastic antineutrino–nucleus scattering,

    N. Ackermannet al., Direct observation of coherent elas- tic antineutrino–nucleus scattering, Nature643, 1229 (2025), arXiv:2501.05206 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Waites, A

    L. Waites, A. Thompson, A. Bungau, J. M. Conrad, B. Dutta, W.-C. Huang, D. Kim, M. Shaevitz, and J. Spitz, Axionlike particle production at beam dump experiments with distinct nuclear excitation lines, Phys. Rev. D107, 095010 (2023), arXiv:2207.13659 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Eguchiet al.(KamLAND), First results from Kam- LAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappear- ance, Phys

    K. Eguchiet al.(KamLAND), First results from Kam- LAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappear- ance, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 021802 (2003), arXiv:hep- ex/0212021

    work page arXiv 2003

  25. [25]

    S. N. Ahmedet al.(SNO), Measurement of the to- tal active B-8 solar neutrino flux at the Sudbury Neu- trino Observatory with enhanced neutral current sensi- tivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 181301 (2004), arXiv:nucl- ex/0309004

    work page arXiv 2004

  26. [26]

    Abusleme et al

    A. Abuslemeet al.(JUNO), First measurement of reactor neutrino oscillations at JUNO (2025), arXiv:2511.14593 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Dutta, W.-C

    B. Dutta, W.-C. Huang, J. L. Newstead, and V. Pandey, Inelastic nuclear scattering from neutrinos and dark mat- ter, Phys. Rev. D106, 113006 (2022), arXiv:2206.08590 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    N. F. Bell, J. B. Dent, B. Dutta, J. Kumar, and J. L. Newstead, Indirect detection of low mass dark matter in direct detection experiments with inelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. D106, 103016 (2022), arXiv:2208.08020 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    V. B. Berestetskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, Quantum Electrodynamics, 2nd ed., Course of Theoreti- cal Physics, Vol. 4 (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1982)

    work page 1982

  30. [30]

    A. A. Aguilar-Arevaloet al.(CONNIE), Searches for CEνNS and Physics beyond the Standard Model us- ing Skipper-CCDs at CONNIE (2024), arXiv:2403.15976 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    H. M. Changet al.(TEXONO), Search of axions at the Kuo-Sheng nuclear power station with a high-purity germanium detector, Phys. Rev. D75, 052004 (2007), arXiv:hep-ex/0609001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  32. [32]

    B. Xin, H. T. Wong, C. Y. Chang, C. P. Chen, H. B. Li, J. Li, F. S. Lee, S. T. Lin, V. Singh, F. Vannucci, S. C. Wu, Q. Yue, and Z. Y. Zhou, Production of electron neutrinos at nuclear power reactors and the prospects for neutrino physics, Physical Review D72, 10.1103/phys- revd.72.012006 (2005)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2005

  33. [33]

    L. I. Schiff, On the Capture of Thermal Neutrons by 11 Deuterons, Phys. Rev.52, 242 (1937)

    work page 1937

  34. [34]

    R. J. Pearson, A. B. Antoniazzi, and W. J. Nuttall, Tri- tium supply and use: a key issue for the development of nuclear fusion energy, Fusion Engineering and Design 136, 1140 (2018), special Issue: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technology (ISFNT-13)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    E. G. Adelbergeret al., Solar fusion cross sections II: the pp chain and CNO cycles, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 195 (2011), arXiv:1004.2318 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  36. [36]

    Combined Analysis of all Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

    B. Aharmimet al.(SNO), Combined Analysis of all Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. C88, 025501 (2013), arXiv:1109.0763 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    J. N. Bahcall, A. M. Serenelli, and S. Basu, New so- lar opacities, abundances, helioseismology, and neutrino fluxes, Astrophys. J. Lett.621, L85 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0412440

    work page arXiv 2005

  38. [38]

    Neutrino-Deuteron Scattering in Effective Field Theory at Next-to-Next-to Leading Order

    M. Butler, J.-W. Chen, and X. Kong, Neutrino deuteron scattering in effective field theory at next-to-next- to-leading order, Phys. Rev. C63, 035501 (2001), arXiv:nucl-th/0008032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  39. [39]

    Neutrino-deuteron reactions at solar neutrino energies

    S. Nakamura, T. Sato, S. Ando, T. S. Park, F. Myhrer, V. P. Gudkov, and K. Kubodera, Neutrino deuteron re- actions at solar neutrino energies, Nucl. Phys. A707, 561 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0201062

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  40. [40]

    J. A. Grifols, E. Masso, and S. Mohanty, Neutrino mag- netic moments and photodisintegration of deuterium, Phys. Lett. B587, 184 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0401144

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  41. [41]

    I. A. E. Agency, Power reactor information system, (PRIS): Canada country statistics and reactor details (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    J. B. Dent, B. Dutta, J. L. Newstead, and I. M. Shoe- maker, Bounds on Cosmic Ray-Boosted Dark Matter in Simplified Models and its Corresponding Neutrino-Floor, Phys. Rev. D101, 116007 (2020), arXiv:1907.03782 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    S.-F. Ge, J. Sheng, C. Xia, and C.-Y. Xing, Nuclear Pro- duction and Analytic Attenuation of Energetic MeV So- lar Dark Matter (2024) arXiv:2408.12448 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    M. T. Ressell, M. B. Aufderheide, S. D. Bloom, K. Griest, G. J. Mathews, and D. A. Resler, Nuclear shell model calculations of neutralino - nucleus cross-sections for Si- 29 and Ge-73, Phys. Rev. D48, 5519 (1993), arXiv:hep- ph/9307228

    work page arXiv 1993

  45. [45]

    Aguilar-Arevaloet al.(CONNIE), Search for light me- diators in the low-energy data of the CONNIE reactor neutrino experiment, JHEP04, 054, arXiv:1910.04951 [hep-ex]

    A. Aguilar-Arevaloet al.(CONNIE), Search for light me- diators in the low-energy data of the CONNIE reactor neutrino experiment, JHEP04, 054, arXiv:1910.04951 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 1910

  46. [46]

    F. T. Avignone, C. Baktash, W. C. Barker, F. P. Calaprice, R. W. Dunford, W. C. Haxton, D. Kahana, R. T. Kouzes, H. S. Miley, and D. M. Moltz, Search for Axions From the 1115-kev Transition of65Cu, Phys. Rev. D37, 618 (1988)

    work page 1988

  47. [47]

    Xinet al.(TEXONO), Production of electron neutri- nos at nuclear power reactors and the prospects for neu- trino physics, Phys

    B. Xinet al.(TEXONO), Production of electron neutri- nos at nuclear power reactors and the prospects for neu- trino physics, Phys. Rev. D72, 012006 (2005), arXiv:hep- ex/0502001

    work page arXiv 2005

  48. [48]

    J. A. Dror, R. Lasenby, and M. Pospelov, Dark forces cou- pled to nonconserved currents, Phys. Rev. D96, 075036 (2017), arXiv:1707.01503 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017