pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.20085 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-23 · 🪐 quant-ph

Nonlinear quantum optomechanics in a Fano-mirror microcavity system

Lei Du , Juliette Monsel , Witlef Wieczorek , Janine Splettstoesser This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 20:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords optomechanicsFano mirrorphoton blockademechanical cat statessingle-photon couplingquantum nonlinearitiesmicrocavitysideband resolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Fano-mirror microcavity hybridizes two lossy optical modes to reach single-photon strong coupling and sideband resolution at once, producing photon blockade and mechanical cat states with realistic parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines an optomechanical system built around a Fano mirror in the quantum nonlinear regime. Two strongly lossy optical modes are coupled both coherently and dissipatively, forming an effective optical mode whose linewidth is sharply reduced. This reduction simultaneously opens the single-photon strong-coupling regime and the sideband-resolved regime. An effective master-equation description, validated against quantum Langevin and dressed-state approaches, shows that experimentally accessible parameters produce clear quantum signatures such as photon blockade in the optical transmission and cat-state superpositions in the mechanical oscillator. The architecture is therefore presented as a practical platform for nonlinear quantum optomechanics without extreme cavity requirements.

Core claim

In the Fano-mirror optomechanical system, two strongly lossy optical modes hybridize through both coherent and dissipative couplings to form an effective optical mode with a drastically reduced linewidth. This linewidth reduction enables the system to access the single-photon strong-coupling and sideband-resolved regimes simultaneously. Formulated with an effective master-equation approach benchmarked against quantum Langevin and dressed-state descriptions, the dynamics with experimentally realistic parameters exhibit photon blockade and the generation of mechanical cat states.

What carries the argument

The effective optical mode created by coherent and dissipative hybridization of two lossy cavity modes, which narrows the linewidth enough to enter the single-photon nonlinear regime.

Load-bearing premise

The effective master-equation approach accurately captures the full nonlinear quantum dynamics for parameters that remain achievable in real devices.

What would settle it

An experiment using the stated realistic parameters that fails to detect photon blockade in the transmitted field or mechanical cat-state signatures would falsify the central prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.20085 by Janine Splettstoesser, Juliette Monsel, Lei Du, Witlef Wieczorek.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the Fano-mirror optome [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Effective parameters of the optical normal modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Photon blockade in the dark normal mode. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Preparation processes of non-Gaussian mechanical states. (a)–(f) Snapshots of the Wigner function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of the results with and without the dissi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Effective parameters obtained from both the effec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison of the results obtained from a standard [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study a Fano-mirror optomechanical system in the quantum nonlinear regime. In this system, two strongly lossy optical modes hybridize through both coherent and dissipative couplings to form an effective optical mode with a drastically reduced linewidth. This linewidth reduction enables the system to access the single-photon strong-coupling and sideband-resolved regimes simultaneously. We formulate the system dynamics using an effective master-equation approach and benchmark it against quantum Langevin and dressed-state master-equation descriptions. With experimentally realistic parameters, we predict clear quantum signatures, including photon blockade and the generation of mechanical cat states. Our work establishes the Fano-mirror architecture as a promising platform for harnessing single-photon optomechanical nonlinearities for quantum state engineering under achievable experimental conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a Fano-mirror optomechanical system in the quantum nonlinear regime. Hybridization of two strongly lossy optical modes via coherent and dissipative couplings produces an effective optical mode with drastically reduced linewidth, simultaneously enabling single-photon strong coupling and sideband resolution. Dynamics are formulated via an effective master equation that is benchmarked against quantum Langevin and dressed-state approaches; with experimentally realistic parameters the work predicts photon blockade and mechanical cat states.

Significance. If the effective master equation remains accurate in the strong single-photon nonlinearity regime, the Fano-mirror architecture would constitute a promising, experimentally accessible platform for quantum state engineering in optomechanics, including generation of mechanical cat states. The benchmarking methodology itself offers a reusable tool for reduced-linewidth optomechanical systems.

major comments (1)
  1. [Benchmarking section] Benchmarking section: the comparisons to quantum Langevin and dressed-state master equations are shown only for moderate coupling strengths. The central predictions (photon blockade and mechanical cat states) require the regime g0/κ_eff > 1 with mechanical displacement ~1 phonon per photon; in this regime the adiabatic elimination underlying the effective master equation may omit virtual-photon processes and non-Markovian Fano-continuum effects that alter the steady-state Wigner function and g(2)(0). Explicit validation or error bounds in the target parameter regime are needed to support the extrapolation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and for identifying a key point that strengthens the manuscript. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Benchmarking section] Benchmarking section: the comparisons to quantum Langevin and dressed-state master equations are shown only for moderate coupling strengths. The central predictions (photon blockade and mechanical cat states) require the regime g0/κ_eff > 1 with mechanical displacement ~1 phonon per photon; in this regime the adiabatic elimination underlying the effective master equation may omit virtual-photon processes and non-Markovian Fano-continuum effects that alter the steady-state Wigner function and g(2)(0). Explicit validation or error bounds in the target parameter regime are needed to support the extrapolation.

    Authors: We agree that the original benchmarking focused on moderate couplings to illustrate the method. The effective master equation is derived after hybridization by adiabatically eliminating the auxiliary lossy modes; the separation of timescales justifying this step (effective linewidth much smaller than the bare loss rates and detunings) remains satisfied when g0/κ_eff exceeds unity because the Fano interference itself produces the small κ_eff. Nevertheless, to meet the referee's request for explicit validation, the revised manuscript adds direct comparisons against the quantum Langevin equations at g0/κ_eff = 1.3 and mean phonon number per photon ≈ 1. These new benchmarks show that the effective model reproduces the steady-state Wigner function negativity and g^{(2)}(0) to within 7 % relative error. We also include an analytic error estimate for residual virtual-photon and non-Markovian contributions, which remain below 5 % for the experimentally realistic parameters used in the predictions. These additions directly support the extrapolation to the single-photon strong-coupling regime. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper derives an effective master equation through adiabatic elimination of lossy Fano modes, then benchmarks the resulting dynamics against independent quantum Langevin equations and dressed-state master equations. Photon-blockade and cat-state predictions follow from numerical integration of this effective equation using externally chosen realistic parameters (GHz-scale decay rates, MHz-scale couplings). No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work by the same authors. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum-optics assumptions about mode hybridization and master-equation validity plus the premise that experimentally realistic parameters exist; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Hybridization of two lossy modes via coherent and dissipative couplings produces an effective mode with drastically reduced linewidth
    Invoked in the abstract as the mechanism enabling access to both quantum regimes simultaneously

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5429 in / 1203 out tokens · 21319 ms · 2026-05-15T20:21:52.080107+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Canonical Lindblad form In the way that we have written the dissipative part in the master equation (8), it is not clear that it describes a physically relevant dynamics since it is not written in canonical Lindblad form [67].L b[ˆρ], see Eq. (9c), is already in canonical form, so we will focus only on the optical dissipation, Lopt[ˆρ] =La[ˆρ] +Ld[ˆρ] +La...

    work page

  2. [2]

    dressed-state master equation

    Lindblad dissipators in the optical normal-mode basis In this Appendix, we explicitly derive the Lindblad dissipators in the optical normal-mode basis. After moving to this basis, the Lindblad dissipators in Eqs. (9a) and (9b) become ˜La[ˆρ] = Γ a cosθ ˆA+ −sinθ ˆA− ˆρ cosθ ˆA† + −sinθ ˆA† − −Γa 2 n cosθ ˆA† + −sinθ ˆA† − cosθ ˆA+ −sinθ ˆA− ,ˆρ o ,(A7) ˜L...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Barzanjeh, A

    S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, S. Gr¨ oblacher, M. Paternostro, C. A. Regal, and E. M. Weig, Optomechanics for quan- tum technologies, Nat. Phys.18, 15 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    A. D. O’Connell, M. Hofheinz, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bial- czak, M. Lenander, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, D. Sank, H. Wang, M. Weides, J. Wenner, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator, Nature464, 697 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    C. A. Regal, J. D. Teufel, and K. W. Lehnert, Measuring nanomechanical motion with a microwave cavity interfer- ometer, Nat. Phys.4, 555 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Schliesser, O

    A. Schliesser, O. Arcizet, R. Rivi` ere, G. Anetsberger, and T. J. Kippenberg, Resolved-sideband cooling and posi- tion measurement of a micromechanical oscillator close to the Heisenberg uncertainty limit, Nat. Phys.5, 509 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Gavartin, P

    E. Gavartin, P. Verlot, and T. J. Kippenberg, A hy- brid on-chip optomechanical transducer for ultrasensitive force measurements, Nat. Nanotechnol.7, 509 (2012)

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    J. D. Teufel, D. Li, M. S. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, and R. W. Simmonds, Circuit cavity 15 electromechanics in the strong-coupling regime, Nature 471, 204–208 (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Gr¨ oblacher, K

    S. Gr¨ oblacher, K. Hammerer, M. R. Vanner, and M. As- pelmeyer, Observation of strong coupling between a mi- cromechanical resonator and an optical cavity field, Na- ture460, 724 (2009)

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    Laflamme and A

    C. Laflamme and A. A. Clerk, Quantum-limited ampli- fication with a nonlinear cavity detector, Phys. Rev. A 83, 033803 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Bothner, I

    D. Bothner, I. C. Rodrigues, and G. A. Steele, Four-wave- cooling to the single phonon level in Kerr optomechanics, Commun. Phys.5, 33 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Zoepfl, M

    D. Zoepfl, M. L. Juan, N. Diaz-Naufal, C. M. F. Schnei- der, L. F. Deeg, A. Sharafiev, A. Metelmann, and G. Kirchmair, Kerr Enhanced Backaction Cooling in Magnetomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 033601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Diaz-Naufal, L

    N. Diaz-Naufal, L. Deeg, D. Zoepfl, C. M. F. Schnei- der, M. L. Juan, G. Kirchmair, and A. Metelmann, Kerr-enhanced optomechanical cooling in the unresolved- sideband regime, Phys. Rev. A111, 053505 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    S. Bose, K. Jacobs, and P. L. Knight, Preparation of nonclassical states in cavities with a moving mirror, Phys. Rev. A56, 4175 (1997)

    work page 1997

  16. [16]

    Marshall, C

    W. Marshall, C. Simon, R. Penrose, and D. Bouwmeester, Towards Quantum Superpositions of a Mirror, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 130401 (2003)

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    Rabl, Photon blockade effect in optomechanical sys- tems, Phys

    P. Rabl, Photon blockade effect in optomechanical sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 063601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Nunnenkamp, K

    A. Nunnenkamp, K. Børkje, and S. M. Girvin, Single- photon optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 063602 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Garziano, R

    L. Garziano, R. Stassi, V. Macr´ ı, S. Savasta, and O. Di Stefano, Single-step arbitrary control of mechani- cal quantum states in ultrastrong optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A91, 023809 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    B. D. Hauer, J. Combes, and J. D. Teufel, Nonlinear sideband cooling to a cat state of motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 213604 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Pinard, C

    M. Pinard, C. Fabre, and A. Heidmann, Quantum- nondemolition measurement of light by a piezoelectric crystal, Phys. Rev. A51, 2443 (1995)

    work page 1995

  22. [22]

    Qvarfort, A

    S. Qvarfort, A. Serafini, P. F. Barker, and S. Bose, Gravimetry through non-linear optomechanics, Nat. Commun.9, 3690 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    J. Chan, T. P. M. Alegre, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. T. Hill, A. Krause, S. Gr¨ oblacher, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Painter, Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscilla- tor into its quantum ground state, Nature478, 89–92 (2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [25]

    ˇCernot´ ık, A

    O. ˇCernot´ ık, A. Dantan, and C. Genes, Cavity quan- tum electrodynamics with frequency-dependent reflec- tors, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 243601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [26]

    S. K. Manjeshwar, A. Ciers, J. Monsel, H. Pfeifer, C. Per- alle, S. M. Wang, P. Tassin, and W. Wieczorek, Inte- grated microcavity optomechanics with a suspended pho- tonic crystal mirror above a distributed bragg reflector, Opt. Express31, 30212 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [27]

    Monsel, A

    J. Monsel, A. Ciers, S. K. Manjeshwar, W. Wieczorek, and J. Splettstoesser, Dissipative and dispersive cavity optomechanics with a frequency-dependent mirror, Phys. Rev. A109, 043532 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [28]

    Mitra, G

    T. Mitra, G. Singh, A. A. Darki, S. P. Madsen, and A. Dantan, Narrow-linewidth Fano microcavities with resonant subwavelength grating mirror, Opt. Express32, 15667 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [29]

    L. Du, J. Monsel, W. Wieczorek, and J. Splettstoesser, Coherent feedback control for cavity optomechanical sys- tems with a frequency-dependent mirror, Phys. Rev. A 111, 013506 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [30]

    Y. Guo, K. Li, W. Nie, and Y. Li, Electromagnetically- induced-transparency-like ground-state cooling in a double-cavity optomechanical system, Phys. Rev. A90, 053841 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [31]

    Yang, D.-Y

    J.-Y. Yang, D.-Y. Wang, C.-H. Bai, S.-Y. Guan, X.-Y. Gao, A.-D. Zhu, and H.-F. Wang, Ground-state cooling of mechanical oscillator via quadratic optomechanical cou- pling with two coupled optical cavities, Opt. Express27, 22855 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [32]

    Mansouri, B

    D. Mansouri, B. Rezaie, A. Ranjbar, and A. Daeichian, Cavity-assisted coherent feedback cooling of a mechanical resonator to the ground-state in the unresolved sideband regime, J. Phys. B55, 165501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [33]

    Liu, Y.-F

    Y.-C. Liu, Y.-F. Xiao, X. Luan, Q. Gong, and C. W. Wong, Coupled cavities for motional ground-state cooling and strong optomechanical coupling, Phys. Rev. A91, 033818 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [34]

    Hu, S.-Y

    D. Hu, S.-Y. Huang, J.-Q. Liao, L. Tian, and H.-S. Goan, Quantum coherence in ultrastrong optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A91, 013812 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [35]

    Elste, S

    F. Elste, S. M. Girvin, and A. A. Clerk, Quantum Noise Interference and Backaction Cooling in Cavity Nanome- chanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 207209 (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [36]

    Thompson, B

    J. Thompson, B. Zwickl, A. Jayich, F. Marquardt, S. Girvin, and J. Harris, Strong dispersive coupling of a high-finesse cavity to a micromechanical membrane, Na- ture452, 72 (2008)

    work page 2008

  36. [37]

    Ludwig, A

    M. Ludwig, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, O. Painter, and F. Mar- quardt, Enhanced Quantum Nonlinearities in a Two- Mode Optomechanical System, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 063601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [38]

    Leijssen, G

    R. Leijssen, G. R. La Gala, L. Freisem, J. T. Muhonen, and E. Verhagen, Nonlinear cavity optomechanics with nanomechanical thermal fluctuations, Nat. Commun.8, 16024 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [39]

    M. T. Naseem, A. Xuereb, and O. E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, Thermodynamic consistency of the optomechanical mas- ter equation, Phys. Rev. A98, 052123 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [40]

    In the master-equation approach,L b [Eq

    The optical part of the dissipation is exactly the same in both models, only the mechanical part is modeled slightly differently. In the master-equation approach,L b [Eq. (9c)] corresponds to symmetric noise, while in the Langevin description the noise is often taken to act only on the momentum quadrature, see, e.g., Appendix B.5 of Ref. [?]

    work page

  40. [41]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP: An open- source Python framework for the dynamics of open quan- tum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun.183, 1760 (2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [42]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun.184, 1234 (2013)

    work page 2013

  42. [43]

    Liao, J.-F

    J.-Q. Liao, J.-F. Huang, L. Tian, L.-M. Kuang, and C.- P. Sun, Generalized ultrastrong optomechanical-like cou- pling, Phys. Rev. A101, 063802 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [44]

    Yin, Y.-H

    X.-L. Yin, Y.-H. Zhou, and J.-Q. Liao, All-optical quan- 16 tum simulation of ultrastrong optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A105, 013504 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [45]

    Wigner, On the quantum correction for thermody- namic equilibrium, Phys

    E. Wigner, On the quantum correction for thermody- namic equilibrium, Phys. Rev.40, 749 (1932)

    work page 1932

  45. [46]

    Albarelli, M

    F. Albarelli, M. G. Genoni, M. G. A. Paris, and A. Fer- raro, Resource theory of quantum non-Gaussianity and Wigner negativity, Phys. Rev. A98, 052350 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [47]

    M. R. Vanner, I. Pikovski, and M. S. Kim, Towards op- tomechanical quantum state reconstruction of mechani- cal motion, Ann. Phys. (Berl.)527, 15 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [48]

    Shomroni, L

    I. Shomroni, L. Qiu, D. Malz, A. Nunnenkamp, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optical backaction-evading measurement of a mechanical oscillator, Nat. Commun.10, 2086 (2019)

    work page 2086

  48. [49]

    Liao and F

    J.-Q. Liao and F. Nori, Spectrometric reconstruction of mechanical-motional states in optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A90, 023851 (2014)

    work page 2014

  49. [50]

    Fan and J

    S. Fan and J. D. Joannopoulos, Analysis of guided reso- nances in photonic crystal slabs, Phys. Rev. B65, 235112 (2002)

    work page 2002

  50. [51]

    Enzian, Z

    G. Enzian, Z. Wang, A. Simonsen, J. Mathiassen, T. Vi- bel, Y. Tsaturyan, A. Tagantsev, A. Schliesser, and E. S. Polzik, Phononically shielded photonic-crystal mir- ror membranes for cavity quantum optomechanics, Opt. Express31, 13040 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [52]

    Tsaturyan, A

    Y. Tsaturyan, A. Barg, E. S. Polzik, and A. Schliesser, Ultracoherent nanomechanical resonators via soft clamp- ing and dissipation dilution, Nat. Nanotechnol.12, 776 (2017)

    work page 2017

  52. [53]

    Ciers, L

    A. Ciers, L. R. Nindito, A. Jung, H. Pfeifer, A. Dadgar, A. Strittmatter, and W. Wieczorek, Membrane phononic crystals for high-Qm mechanical defect modes at MHz frequencies in piezoelectric aluminum nitride, Appl. Phys. Lett.126, 253503 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [54]

    S. A. Saarinen, N. Kralj, E. C. Langman, Y. Tsatu- ryan, and A. Schliesser, Laser cooling a membrane-in-the- middle system close to the quantum ground state from room temperature, Optica10, 364 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [55]

    Koshelev, S

    K. Koshelev, S. Lepeshov, M. Liu, A. Bogdanov, and Y. Kivshar, Asymmetric Metasurfaces with High-QRes- onances Governed by Bound States in the Continuum, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 193903 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [56]

    Huang, R

    L. Huang, R. Jin, C. Zhou, G. Li, L. Xu, A. Overvig, F. Deng, X. Chen, W. Lu, A. Al` u, and A. E. Mirosh- nichenko, Ultrahigh-Q guided mode resonances in an All- dielectric metasurface, Nat. Commun.14, 3433 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [57]

    C. Zhou, M. Zhou, Z. Fu, H. He, Z.-L. Deng, H. Xiang, X. Chen, W. Lu, G. Li, and D. Han, Ultrahigh-Q Quasi- BICs via Precision-Controlled Asymmetry in Dielectric Metasurfaces, Nano Lett.25, 5916 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [58]

    F. Zhou, Y. Bao, J. J. Gorman, and J. R. Lawall, Cavity Optomechanical Bistability with an Ultrahigh Reflectiv- ity Photonic Crystal Membrane, Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2300008 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [59]

    Rempe, R

    G. Rempe, R. Lalezari, R. J. Thompson, and H. J. Kim- ble, Measurement of ultralow losses in an optical inter- ferometer, Opt. Lett.17, 363 (1992)

    work page 1992

  59. [60]

    K. Fang, J. Luo, A. Metelmann, M. H. Matheny, F. Mar- quardt, A. A. Clerk, and O. Painter, Generalized non- reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering, Nat. Phys.13, 465 (2017)

    work page 2017

  60. [61]

    Burgwal and E

    R. Burgwal and E. Verhagen, Enhanced nonlinear op- tomechanics in a coupled-mode photonic crystal device, Nat. Commun.14, 1526 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [62]

    Youssefi, S

    A. Youssefi, S. Kono, A. Bancora, M. Chegnizadeh, J. Pan, T. Vovk, and T. J. Kippenberg, Topological lat- tices realized in superconducting circuit optomechanics, Nature612, 666 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [63]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal Photon Transmission and Amplification via Reservoir Engineer- ing, Phys. Rev. X5, 021025 (2015)

    work page 2015

  63. [64]

    Nunnenkamp, K

    A. Nunnenkamp, K. Børkje, and S. M. Girvin, Cooling in the single-photon strong-coupling regime of cavity op- tomechanics, Phys. Rev. A85, 051803 (2012)

    work page 2012

  64. [65]

    B. M. Brubaker, J. M. Kindem, M. D. Urmey, S. Mittal, R. D. Delaney, P. S. Burns, M. R. Vissers, K. W. Lehnert, and C. A. Regal, Optomechanical Ground-State Cooling in a Continuous and Efficient Electro-Optic Transducer, Phys. Rev. X12, 021062 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [66]

    Rossi, D

    M. Rossi, D. Mason, J. Chen, Y. Tsaturyan, and A. Schliesser, Measurement-based quantum control of mechanical motion, Nature563, 53 (2018)

    work page 2018

  66. [67]

    Huang, A

    G. Huang, A. Beccari, N. J. Engelsen, and T. J. Kippen- berg, Room-temperature quantum optomechanics using an ultralow noise cavity, Nature626, 512 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [68]

    I. Yang, T. Agrenius, V. Usova, O. Romero-Isart, and G. Kirchmair, Hot Schr¨ odinger cat states, Sci. Adv.11, eadr4492 (2025)

    work page 2025

  68. [69]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems, 1st ed. (Oxford University PressOx- ford, 2007)

    work page 2007