Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

U-shaped branes in the AdS bulk reproduce the symmetry operators that measure charges of continuous internal symmetries in the boundary theory.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 20:44 UTC pith:G3N4IT73

load-bearing objection A careful, mostly successful dictionary paper; the hanging-brane claim is well motivated, but the top-down coefficient matching needs independent verification. the 5 major comments →

arxiv 2602.22377 v2 pith:G3N4IT73 submitted 2026-02-25 hep-th

Continuous symmetries and charge measurement of boundary operators in holography

Ibrahima Bah , Federico Bonetti , Mufaro Chitoto , Enoch Leung This is my paper
classification hep-th MSC 81T3081T4083E30 PACS 11.25.Tq04.65.+e11.30.-j
keywords holographysymmetry operatorscontinuous symmetriesAdS/CFTWilson lineshanging branesKK monopolestachyon condensation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a holographic dictionary for charge measurement of continuous internal symmetries. It argues that the symmetry operator in the boundary field theory—the object that measures the charge of a Wilson line—is realized in the bulk by a U-shaped (hanging) brane that extends from the AdS boundary into the interior. At low energies, the flat worldvolume gauge field on this brane, with parallel transport α, reproduces the Gauss-law operator exp(i θ^I ∫ τ_IJ ∗F^J) with θ = α n, matching the thickened regularization of continuous symmetry operators in field theory and resolving their divergence. The paper provides explicit top-down realizations—D5-KK bound states in Type IIB and M5-KK bound states in M-theory—and shows that their fusion, driven by tachyon condensation, reproduces the group law.

Core claim

The central claim is that every continuous internal symmetry operator in a holographic field theory is realized by a d-dimensional brane of the form γ^1 × M_{d−1}, where γ^1 is an arc hanging from the conformal boundary and M_{d−1} is the codimension-1 manifold on which the symmetry operator is supported. The brane carries a flat U(1) gauge field a_1 with Dirichlet boundary conditions and parallel transport ∫_{γ^1} a_1 = α; its topological coupling to the bulk gauge field is ∫ a_1 ∧ n^I τ_IJ ∗F^J. This evaluates to the Gauss-law operator U(θ; M_{d−1}) = exp(i θ^I ∫ τ_IJ ∗F^J) with θ^I = α n^I, precisely the low-energy expression derived from Gauss's law. In top-down constructions, the Wilson

What carries the argument

The central object is the hanging (U-shaped) brane with worldvolume γ^1 × M_{d−1}, carrying a flat worldvolume U(1) gauge field a_1 with ∫_{γ^1} a_1 = α and Dirichlet boundary conditions. Its topological coupling ∫ a_1 ∧ n^I τ_IJ ∗F^J produces the symmetry operator U(θ;M_{d−1}) = exp(i θ^I ∫ τ_IJ ∗F^J) with θ = α n. The paper also uses the composite flat connection v_1 = eK_1 ∧ K_1 built from two compact scalars on the KK monopole worldvolume—or its M-theory analogue a^KK_1—as the microscopic origin of a_1, and tachyon condensation on coincident brane-antibrane pairs as the mechanism for fusion.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the exact normalization and field content of the quoted KK-monopole worldvolume actions—in particular the existence of the composite flat connection v_1 = eK_1 ∧ K_1 (or a^KK_1) and the anomaly coefficients that force α_D5 = 2α_KK = α and α_M5 = 3α_KK = α; if either deviates, the universal bound-state picture fails.

What would settle it

Derive the KK-monopole topological couplings from first principles (for example from the anomaly polynomial of the worldvolume theory) and check the relative coefficients that yield τ_flux = 2τ_EH in Type IIB and τ_flux = 3τ_EH in M-theory, together with the implied identifications of the α parameters; any mismatch would falsify the claim that the hanging D5-KK (resp. M5-KK) bound state reproduces the full low-energy symmetry operator.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, continuous symmetry operators in every regular Sasaki-Einstein compactification of Type IIB or M-theory admit a brane realization as a bound state of a D5/M5-brane and a KK monopole, with the symmetry group determined by the internal wrapping data.
  • The hanging-brane picture resolves the divergence of naive continuous symmetry operators in field theory: the thickness of the regulator is mapped to a finite brane width, making the operator well-defined and topological near the boundary.
  • Charge measurement is realized by a Hanany-Witten transition: the phase picked up when the hanging brane crosses a Wilson line is precisely the group-theoretic pairing θ_ab q^ab, allowing reconstruction of the representation R of the Wilson line.
  • The fusion of symmetry operators is governed by tachyon condensation: as two hanging branes approach, a tachyon appears, condenses, and recombines the branes into a single stack whose center-of-mass mode yields the combined parameter α+α′, reproducing the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff composition law.
  • The top-down construction explains the split of the gauge kinetic term into flux and Einstein-Hilbert contributions: the D5/M5 part contributes τ_flux and the KK monopole contributes τ_EH, with the relative α identifications fixed by the anomaly coefficients.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same hanging-brane mechanism should extend to higher-form continuous symmetries by promoting the arc γ^1 to a higher-dimensional surface and the Wilson line to a Wilson surface, predicting (d−2)-dimensional symmetry operators built from higher-dimensional bound states; this is a natural testable extension the authors flag but do not work out.
  • If the Chern-Simons terms are included via naive Page charges, the resulting operators become non-invertible; the hanging-brane realization suggests a positive statement about when invertibility fails—namely when the boundary condition on a_1 is relaxed—and may provide a brane realization of these non-invertible continuous symmetry operators.
  • The universal form θ = α n implies that the direction of the symmetry transformation in the Lie algebra is determined by the internal wrapping numbers of the brane, while the magnitude is set by the flat connection parallel transport; this suggests a clean way to engineer symmetry groups from geometry: any cycle in the internal space with the right intersection number gives a generator.
  • One could test the framework by computing the charge-measurement phase in a new background (e.g., AdS7×S4 with M5-branes) and checking that the same α identifications appear, since the low-energy action is universal.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies holographic duals of continuous 0-form global symmetries. In a bottom-up analysis of gauge fields in AdS_{d+1}, it derives Gauss-law symmetry operators U(θ;M_{d−1}) = exp(iθ^I ∫_{M_{d−1}} τ_{IJ} ∗F^J) and proposes that their regularized versions are realized by U-shaped d-dimensional branes hanging from the conformal boundary, with a worldvolume coupling ∫ a_1 ∧ n^I τ_{IJ} ∗F^J and a flat connection a_1 satisfying ∫_{γ^1} a_1 = α. It then provides top-down realizations: in Type IIB on AdS_5×SE_5, a D3-brane wrapping a maximal S^3 gives Wilson lines with q_ab = N w n_ab, and a D5-KK bound state gives the symmetry operator with θ_ab = α m_ab; in M-theory on AdS_4×SE_7, an M5-brane gives Wilson lines and a hanging M5-KK bound state gives the symmetry operator. Charge measurement is described via Hanany-Witten transitions producing a phase exp(iα n_{F1/M2}) = exp(½ i θ_ab q^{ab}). The paper also analyzes the DBI dynamics of the hanging branes, arguing they are topological near the boundary, and studies tachyon condensation in brane-antibrane systems to explain fusion.

Significance. If the main result holds, the paper provides a potentially universal dictionary: continuous symmetry operators in holography are realized by hanging brane bound states, and their fusion is the group law. The clean bottom-up Gauss-law derivation, the elegant sphere Wilson-line computation (§3.1, giving q_ab = N w n_ab), and the explicit verification of the volume identity (3.15) and the summation identities in Apps. C.2–C.3 are noteworthy strengths. The Hanany-Witten phase computation (3.31)–(3.32) is a concrete, checkable consequence. However, the top-down bound-state construction depends on quoted KK-monopole worldvolume normalizations that are not independently derived, and the 'universal' claim is demonstrated in detail only for a subset of isometries.

major comments (5)
  1. [§3.5.3, Eq. (3.76); App. C.3, Eqs. (C.117)–(C.119)] The final operator (3.77) is obtained only after setting α_M5 = α and α_KK = α/3 in (3.76). These relative normalizations are not derived from the M5-brane and KK-monopole actions; they are chosen so that α_M5 τ_flux + 3α_KK τ_EH = ατ. The analogous Type IIB identification α_D5 = 2α_KK = α in (C.71) is also imposed. Since the universal bound-state claim depends on the total coefficient being exactly τ, the paper needs either a first-principles derivation of these parallel-transport normalizations or an explicit statement that they are matching conditions, not predictions. As written, the top-down calculation is a consistency check on the low-energy operator rather than an independent derivation.
  2. [§2.5–§2.6, Eqs. (2.27), (2.29), (2.31)] The hanging-brane action (2.27) is written down with precisely the coupling a_1 ∧ n^I τ_{IJ} ∗F^J, so its evaluation (2.29) recovers the Gauss-law operator (2.16) by construction. Likewise, the fusion algebra (2.31)–(2.34) re-derives the BCH rule already built into the exponential parametrization of U(θ;M). These sections therefore demonstrate internal consistency but do not by themselves provide an independent derivation of the universal hanging-brane picture. The independent evidence is the top-down construction, where the burden of proof lies. The paper should state more carefully that the bottom-up discussion is a consistency argument, not a prediction.
  3. [§4.3.1, Eq. (4.25)] The touching-brane tachyon analysis leads to Eq. (4.25), which the authors themselves note cannot be satisfied under the hierarchy ℓ_s ≪ ℓ_c ≪ z_0 ≪ L required for the supergravity approximation. The subsequent intersecting-brane analysis (§4.3.2) does yield a tachyonic mode (4.29), but the first mechanism is still used to justify the D4-brane intermediate state and the reopening orientation (Figure 9). As it stands, the dynamical fusion story is not complete; please either show that the touching-brane argument is unnecessary, or provide a controlled approximation in which (4.25) is compatible with the stated hierarchy.
  4. [Apps. C.2.3–C.2.4, C.3.3–C.3.4; Eqs. (C.56), (C.100), (C.65)] The analysis assumes the exact topological couplings on the KK monopole from Refs. [87] and [136], including the anomaly polynomials (C.56) and (C.100) and the composite flat connection v_1 = eK_1∧K_1 in (C.65). These inputs are quoted without independent derivation. If the coefficients in these worldvolume actions differ by a factor, the bound-state contribution no longer sums to the full τ, and the central top-down claim fails. Since these coefficients are also intertwined with the hand-set α-normalizations discussed above, the universal bound-state result is only as secure as the quoted external actions. Please verify the needed coefficients from a first-principles computation or from an independent source, or clearly mark them as external input whose verification is beyond the present scope.
  5. [§3.4.2, §3.4.4, §3.6] The paper claims a universal description for regular Sasaki-Einstein backgrounds, but the explicit top-down construction is complete only for the U(1)_ψ (Reeb) and baryonic sectors. For other non-Abelian isometries, §3.4.2 states that 'the details largely depend on the topology of the Kähler-Einstein base' and no universal prescription is given. The examples S^5 and T^{1,1} are worked out, and §3.6 gives a sketch for M^{3,2} and Q^{1,1,1}, but the general claim for every regular-SE background is not established. Please temper the universality claim or provide the missing general construction.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (3.33)] In the T^{1,1} metric, the definition Dψ = dψ − ½ cosθ_1 dϕ_1 − ½ cosθ_1 dϕ_2 has cosθ_1 twice; the second should be cosθ_2.
  2. [Eq. (C.81)] In the list for m_ab = −1, the entry (7,8) appears again; it should be (8,7).
  3. [§3.4.1] Typo: 'regular Sakaki-Einstein metrics' should be 'regular Sasaki-Einstein metrics'.
  4. [Eq. (2.27)] The notation n^I τ_{IJ} ∗F^J is not fully explicit about the index contraction and the role of the integer parameters n^I; please spell out that n^I are the wrapping numbers and the contraction includes the gauge coupling matrix.
  5. [§4, intro paragraph] The statement that the M5/KK DBI analysis will follow 'qualitatively similarly' is not substantiated; given the chiral 2-form complication, a brief justification or explicit check would be helpful.
  6. [Eq. (4.15)] The piecewise expression for 1/g^2 would be clearer if the two lines were labelled with the limits they correspond to (z_* ≪ z_0 and z_* → z_0).

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Bottom-up action and D5/M5+KK 'bound-state' realizations reproduce the Gauss-law operator by construction: the brane coupling is written as a1∧nτ∗F and the α-relations are imposed to match the known coefficient.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec 3.2/C.2.5, Eq. (C.71); Sec 3.5/C.3.4, Eq. (3.76)]
    "The total expression for the symmetry operator is obtained combining (C.30) and (C.70), using αD5 = 2αKK = α. We get the result U= exp(1/2 i α τ mab R M3 ∗Fab), which matches the expectation from the Gauss’s law low-energy analysis of Section 2.3."

    The target operator (2.16) with the known low-energy coefficient τ is the input. The D5 and KK contributions both have the same functional form (proportional to m_ab ∫∗F^ab), and the independent parallel-transport parameters α_D5, α_KK are not derived from first principles; the relation α_D5 = 2α_KK = α is imposed so that the weighted sum equals the target. With two free parameters and one equation, any coefficient of the quoted KK worldvolume action could be absorbed by a different choice of α_KK, so the matching is a parameter fit rather than a prediction. The M-theory case is the same: α_M5 = α and α_KK = α/3 are imposed in (3.76) to force the sum to reduce to ατ.

  2. self definitional [Sec 2.5, Eqs. (2.27)–(2.30)]
    "The effective action for this d-dimensional object is given by R γ1×M d−1 a1 ∧ n^I τ_IJ ∗F^J ... Making use of (2.28), the hanging brane (2.27) evaluates to α n^I R M d−1 τ_IJ ∗F^J. This matches the expected form (2.16) from the Gauss’s law constraints with the identification θ^I = α n^I."

    The brane action is written down using exactly the same ingredients that appear in the target operator (2.16): the coupling matrix τ_IJ, the field strength ∗F^J, and integer parameters n^I. The only new datum is the flat worldvolume gauge field a1, whose holonomy is defined by (2.28) to be α. The subsequent “match” is therefore guaranteed by construction; it is a consistency/construction move, not an independent derivation of the operator from the regularization or from string theory. Presenting this as the universal derivation of the symmetry operator is a definitional reduction: the output is built into the ansatz.

full rationale

Most of the paper is a set of realizations rather than a derivation from independent first principles. The low-energy operator (2.16) is derived from Gauss’s law; the hanging brane action (2.27) is then written down with exactly the same τ, ∗F, n data and its holonomy is defined to be α, so its “matching” is guaranteed. This would be harmless if presented only as an ansatz, but the paper presents it as the universal construction, and the fusion rules similarly restate the exponential group law by construction. The more serious issue is the top-down coefficient matching: the D5 and KK contributions are added and the relations α_D5 = 2α_KK = α (and α_M5 = α, α_KK = α/3) are imposed so that the sum equals the known operator. Because these parallel-transport parameters are free, the equality is a fit, not a test; different KK worldvolume coefficients could be absorbed by different choices. Nevertheless, the paper does contain independent content: the specific internal supports (Σ2, Σ3, CP1⊂CP2), the identification of τ_flux and τ_EH with distinct brane types, and the Hanany-Witten phase for charge measurement are non-trivial and go beyond the bottom-up ansatz. References to the authors’ previous work [49] are used but the relevant computations are reproduced here, so I do not score higher. Score 3 reflects partial construction/fitting, not a fully circular paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 8 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are postulated. The 'hanging brane' is a configuration of established objects (D5/KK and M5/KK bound states, D3/M5 Wilson lines); the composite KK-monopole gauge field v_1 (C.65) is built from pre-existing worldvolume scalars. Free parameters: the α-normalization ratios (α_KK/α_M5 = 1/3; α_D5/α_KK = 2) are the only hand-set numbers; the brane profile parameters z_0, ℓ_c and the cutoff z_* are physical/regulator scales of the configuration, not fitted constants. Axioms are dominated by external worldvolume-action inputs and the standard AdS/CFT dictionary; two are ad hoc to this paper (the χ-profile ansatz and the Schrödinger tachyon treatment).

free parameters (1)
  • α_KK/α_M5 = 1/3 normalization in AdS4×S7 (and α_D5 = 2α_KK = α in AdS5×S5) = α_KK = α/3 (M-theory); α_D5 = 2α_KK = α (IIB)
    The relative parallel transports of the brane worldvolume gauge fields are set so that the M5+KK (resp. D5+KK) WZ contributions combine to ατ = α(τ_flux + τ_EH), with the ratio τ_flux/τ_EH = 3 (resp. 2) taken from [79]. Consistency choice, not independently derived.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption Weakly coupled supergravity description in AdS_{d+1} with gauge fields A^I and Dirichlet boundary conditions exists (standard AdS/CFT dictionary: bulk gauge symmetry = boundary global symmetry).
    Stated in Sec 2.1 ('hinges only on the assumption of having a weakly coupled supergravity description') and Sec 2.3 (Dirichlet b.c. A^I = 0).
  • domain assumption The pre-existing worldvolume actions quoted are correct with their quoted normalizations: Type IIB KK monopole of [87] (anomaly polynomial C.56/C.58), M-theory KK monopole of [136] (C.100), D5/D4/M5 WZ couplings (C.24, 3.68, 3.79), including the composite flat field v_1 = eK_1∧K_1 (C.65).
    The central coefficient matching (3.72)+(3.75)→(3.77) and (C.30)+(C.70)→(C.72) inherits its coefficients from these external actions; no independent derivation is given in this paper.
  • domain assumption Bianchi identities and flux parametrizations as used (G5 (3.25)/(3.42); G7 (3.61); X8 term neglected).
    Standard string/M-theory results; the X8 omission is explicitly acknowledged in Sec 3.5.1.
  • standard math Regular Sasaki-Einstein structure: X_5 (resp. X_7) is an S^1 fibration over a positive-curvature Kähler-Einstein base, with the Tian-Yau classification used.
    Sec 3.4.1 and 3.6; the quasi-regular case is deferred in footnote 19.
  • ad hoc to paper The Wilson-line collective-coordinate ansatz Y^a = χ^a_b(τ) Y^b_(0)(σ), χ ∈ SO(n+1), captures all relevant internal modes; the vacuum wraps a maximal S^{n−2} w times.
    Sec 3.1, eq. (3.5); supported by the DBI analysis in App D.4, but the ansatz itself is assumed.
  • domain assumption The D5-D5 tachyon potential of [144,145] and its expansion (App D) describe the hanging-brane recombination; the M5 case inherits this qualitatively.
    App D, eqs. (D.1)–(D.3); the M5 dynamical analysis is explicitly an expectation ('we expect...') in Sec 4.
  • standard math q is quantized as a dominant analytically integral weight (co-adjoint orbit quantization of the Wilson line).
    App A; standard theorem of the highest weight applied to line bundles on G/S_q.
  • ad hoc to paper The Schrödinger treatment of the tachyon (separable ansatz (4.19), potential (4.21)) captures the brane-fusion instability.
    Sec 4.3.1; the resulting hierarchy problem (4.25) is acknowledged by the authors, weakening this assumption's domain of validity.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 72033 in / 26885 out tokens · 243881 ms · 2026-08-02T20:44:43.378980+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study holographic charge measurement for continuous internal symmetries. Charged boundary operators are characterized by Wilson lines of bulk gauge fields ending on the boundary, while charge measurement is performed using U-shaped defects hanging from the boundary. We derive universal features of this process from a low-energy point of view, and show how the hanging defect picture mimics the thickening regularization of continuous symmetry operators in field theory. Furthermore, we provide explicit top-down realizations in AdS/CFT setups in Type IIB string theory and M-theory, featuring Abelian as well as non-Abelian symmetries. In the case of Type IIB constructions, we analyze the brane dynamics underlying the charge measurement process. Along the way, we also characterize how hanging brane configurations can be regarded as being topological, and demonstrate how tachyon dynamics account for their fusion rules.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quiver Approach to Symmetry Theories

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An algebraic method using the path algebra of quivers extracts symmetry anomaly data for 5D SCFTs engineered from M-theory on Calabi-Yau cones.

  2. Linking defects via AdS/CFT holography

    hep-th 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0

    A hanging D5/anti-D5 pair in a deformed AdS5 x S5 background is proposed as the topological defect that measures the U(1) charge of determinant operators.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

166 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries,JHEP 02(2015) 172 [1412.5148]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Bhardwaj and Y

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa,On finite symmetries and their gauging in two dimensions, JHEP03(2018) 189 [1704.02330]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang,Fusion category symmetry. Part I. Anomaly in-flow and gapped phases,JHEP04(2024) 132 [1912.02817]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Thorngren and Y

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang,Fusion category symmetry. Part II. Categoriosities at c = 1 and beyond,JHEP07(2024) 051 [2106.12577]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Bhardwaj, L.E

    L. Bhardwaj, L.E. Bottini, S. Schafer-Nameki and A. Tiwari,Non-invertible higher-categorical symmetries,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 007 [2204.06564]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Müller,On the Higher Categorical Structure of Topological Defects in Quantum Field Theories,2505.04761

    L. Müller,On the Higher Categorical Structure of Topological Defects in Quantum Field Theories,2505.04761

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    I. Bah, E. Leung and T. Waddleton,On the Physics of Higher Condensation Defects, 2506.04346

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    S. Kim, O. Sela and Z. Sun,Higher structure of non-invertible symmetries from Lagrangian descriptions,2509.20540

    arXiv

  9. [9]

    Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  11. [11]

    Apruzzi, I

    F. Apruzzi, I. Bah, F. Bonetti and S. Schafer-Nameki,Noninvertible Symmetries from Holography and Branes,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 121601 [2208.07373]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    García Etxebarria,Branes and Non-Invertible Symmetries,Fortsch

    I. García Etxebarria,Branes and Non-Invertible Symmetries,Fortsch. Phys.70(2022) 2200154 [2208.07508]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Heckman, M

    J.J. Heckman, M. Hübner, E. Torres and H.Y. Zhang,The Branes Behind Generalized Symmetry Operators,Fortsch. Phys.71(2023) 2200180 [2209.03343]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Heckman, M

    J.J. Heckman, M. Hubner, E. Torres, X. Yu and H.Y. Zhang,Top down approach to topological duality defects,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 046015 [2212.09743]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Etheredge, I

    M. Etheredge, I. Garcia Etxebarria, B. Heidenreich and S. Rauch,Branes and symmetries forN= 3 S-folds,JHEP09(2023) 005 [2302.14068]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Franco and X

    S. Franco and X. Yu,Generalized symmetries in 2D from string theory: SymTFTs, intrinsic relativeness, and anomalies of non-invertible symmetries,JHEP11(2024) 004 [2404.19761]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Gutperle, Y.-Y

    M. Gutperle, Y.-Y. Li, D. Rathore and K. Roumpedakis,Non-invertible symmetries in SN orbifold CFTs and holography,JHEP09(2024) 110 [2405.15693]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Knighton, V

    B. Knighton, V. Sriprachyakul and J. Vošmera,Topological defects and tensionless holography,JHEP07(2025) 083 [2406.03467]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Yu,Noninvertible symmetries in 2D from type IIB string theory,Phys

    X. Yu,Noninvertible symmetries in 2D from type IIB string theory,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 065008 [2310.15339]. – 92 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Fernandez-Melgarejo, G

    J.J. Fernandez-Melgarejo, G. Giorgi, D. Marques and J.A. Rosabal,Noninvertible symmetries in type IIB supergravity,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 066024 [2407.09402]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Dierigl, J.J

    M. Dierigl, J.J. Heckman, M. Montero and E. Torres,R7-branes as charge conjugation operators,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 046004 [2305.05689]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    I. Bah, E. Leung and T. Waddleton,Non-invertible symmetries, brane dynamics, and tachyon condensation,JHEP01(2024) 117 [2306.15783]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Apruzzi, F

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, D.S.W. Gould and S. Schafer-Nameki,Aspects of categorical symmetries from branes: SymTFTs and generalized charges,SciPost Phys.17(2024) 025 [2306.16405]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Cvetič, J.J

    M. Cvetič, J.J. Heckman, M. Hübner and E. Torres,Generalized symmetries, gravity, and the swampland,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 026012 [2307.13027]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Baume, J.J

    F. Baume, J.J. Heckman, M. Hübner, E. Torres, A.P. Turner and X. Yu,SymTrees and Multi-Sector QFTs,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 106013 [2310.12980]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Del Zotto, S.N

    M. Del Zotto, S.N. Meynet and R. Moscrop,Remarks on geometric engineering, symmetry TFTs and anomalies,JHEP07(2024) 220 [2402.18646]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Hu,Nontrivial bundles and defect operators in n-form gauge theories,JHEP12(2024) 171 [2404.03406]

    S. Hu,Nontrivial bundles and defect operators in n-form gauge theories,JHEP12(2024) 171 [2404.03406]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Argurio, F

    R. Argurio, F. Benini, M. Bertolini, G. Galati and P. Niro,On the symmetry TFT of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory,JHEP07(2024) 130 [2404.06601]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Zhang,K-theoretic Global Symmetry in String-constructed QFT and T-duality, 2404.16097

    H.Y. Zhang,K-theoretic Global Symmetry in String-constructed QFT and T-duality, 2404.16097

    arXiv

  30. [30]

    Braeger, V

    N. Braeger, V. Chakrabhavi, J.J. Heckman and M. Hübner,Generalized symmetries of nonsupersymmetric orbifolds,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 066015 [2404.17639]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Bergman and F

    O. Bergman and F. Mignosa,String theory and the SymTFT of 3d orthosymplectic Chern-Simons theory,JHEP04(2025) 047 [2412.00184]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Caldararu, T

    A. Caldararu, T. Pantev, E. Sharpe, B. Sung and X. Yu,Noninvertible symmetries in the B model TFT,2504.02023

    arXiv

  33. [33]

    Bonetti, M

    F. Bonetti, M. Del Zotto and R. Minasian,SymTFTs and non-invertible symmetries of 6d (2,0) SCFTs of type D from M-theory,JHEP02(2025) 156 [2412.07842]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Christensen,Holography and discrete theta angles for disconnected gauge groups, 2412.19887

    F.B. Christensen,Holography and discrete theta angles for disconnected gauge groups, 2412.19887

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Cvetič, J.J

    M. Cvetič, J.J. Heckman, M. Hübner and C. Murdia,Metric Isometries, Holography, and Continuous Symmetry Operators,2501.17911

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Cvetič, J.J

    M. Cvetič, J.J. Heckman, M. Hübner and E. Torres,Fluxbranes, generalized symmetries, and Verlinde’s metastable monopole,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 046007 [2305.09665]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    García-Valdecasas,Non-invertible symmetries in supergravity,JHEP04(2023) 102 [2301.00777]

    E. García-Valdecasas,Non-invertible symmetries in supergravity,JHEP04(2023) 102 [2301.00777]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Najjar,Modified instanton sum and 4-group structure in 4dN= 1SU(M)SYM from holography,2503.17108

    M. Najjar,Modified instanton sum and 4-group structure in 4dN= 1SU(M)SYM from holography,2503.17108

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Bergman, E

    O. Bergman, E. Garcia-Valdecasas, F. Mignosa and D. Rodriguez-Gomez,Non-BPS branes and continuous symmetries,JHEP02(2025) 066 [2407.00773]. – 93 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Waddleton,U(1)R-Symmetry Topological Operators from Branes in Holography, 2408.14542

    T. Waddleton,U(1)R-Symmetry Topological Operators from Branes in Holography, 2408.14542

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Calvo, F

    H. Calvo, F. Mignosa and D. Rodriguez-Gomez,R-symmetries, anomalies and non-invertible defects from non-BPS branes,2506.13859

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Calvo, F

    H. Calvo, F. Mignosa and D. Rodriguez-Gomez,Continuous symmetry defects and brane/anti-brane systems,2503.04892

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    I. Bah, F. Bonetti, R. Minasian and E. Nardoni,Anomalies of QFTs from M-theory and Holography,JHEP01(2020) 125 [1910.04166]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Bah and F

    I. Bah and F. Bonetti,Anomaly Inflow, Accidental Symmetry, and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,JHEP01(2020) 117 [1910.07549]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    I. Bah, F. Bonetti, R. Minasian and P. Weck,Anomaly Inflow Methods for SCFT Constructions in Type IIB,JHEP02(2021) 116 [2002.10466]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    I. Bah, F. Bonetti and R. Minasian,Discrete and higher-form symmetries in SCFTs from wrapped M5-branes,JHEP03(2021) 196 [2007.15003]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    I. Bah, F. Bonetti, E. Leung and P. Weck,M5-branes probing flux backgrounds,JHEP10 (2022) 122 [2111.01790]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    Mignosa and D

    F. Mignosa and D. Rodriguez-Gomez,Non-Abelian R-symmetry and dielectric branes, 2601.23217

    arXiv

  49. [49]

    I. Bah, F. Bonetti, M. Chitoto and E. Leung,Non-Abelian Symmetry Operators from Hanging Branes inAdS5 ×S 5,2510.19812

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    I. Bah, P. Jefferson, K. Roumpedakis and T. Waddleton,Symmetry Operators and Gravity, 2411.08858

    arXiv

  51. [51]

    Balachandran, S

    A.P. Balachandran, S. Borchardt and A. Stern,Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Descriptions of Yang-Mills Particles,Phys. Rev. D17(1978) 3247

    1978

  52. [52]

    Alekseev, L.D

    A. Alekseev, L.D. Faddeev and S.L. Shatashvili,Quantization of symplectic orbits of compact Lie groups by means of the functional integral,J. Geom. Phys.5(1988) 391

    1988

  53. [53]

    Diakonov and V.Y

    D. Diakonov and V.Y. Petrov,A Formula for the Wilson Loop,Phys. Lett. B224(1989) 131

    1989

  54. [54]

    Stone,Supersymmetry and the Quantum Mechanics of Spin,Nucl

    M. Stone,Supersymmetry and the Quantum Mechanics of Spin,Nucl. Phys. B314(1989) 557

    1989

  55. [55]

    Alvarez, I.M

    O. Alvarez, I.M. Singer and P. Windey,Quantum Mechanics and the Geometry of the Weyl Character Formula,Nucl. Phys. B337(1990) 467

    1990

  56. [56]

    Deligne, P

    P. Deligne, P. Etingof, D.S. Freed, L.C. Jeffrey, D. Kazhdan, J.W. Morgan et al.,Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians: Volume 2, vol. 2, American Mathematical Society (1999)

    1999

  57. [57]

    Beasley,Localization for Wilson Loops in Chern-Simons Theory,Adv

    C. Beasley,Localization for Wilson Loops in Chern-Simons Theory,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.17(2013) 1 [0911.2687]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    Tong and K

    D. Tong and K. Wong,Monopoles and Wilson Lines,JHEP06(2014) 048 [1401.6167]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    Witten,AdS/CFT correspondence and topological field theory.,JHEP12(1998) 012 [hep-th/9812012]

    E. Witten,AdS/CFT correspondence and topological field theory.,JHEP12(1998) 012 [hep-th/9812012]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  60. [60]

    Belov and G.W

    D. Belov and G.W. Moore,Conformal blocks for AdS(5) singletons,hep-th/0412167. – 94 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Diaconescu, G.W

    E. Diaconescu, G.W. Moore and D.S. Freed,The M theory three form and E(8) gauge theory,hep-th/0312069

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    Moore,Anomalies, Gauss laws, and Page charges in M-theory,Comptes Rendus Physique6(2005) 251 [hep-th/0409158]

    G.W. Moore,Anomalies, Gauss laws, and Page charges in M-theory,Comptes Rendus Physique6(2005) 251 [hep-th/0409158]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  63. [63]

    Belov and G.W

    D. Belov and G.W. Moore,Holographic Action for the Self-Dual Field,hep-th/0605038

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    Freed, G.W

    D.S. Freed, G.W. Moore and G. Segal,Heisenberg Groups and Noncommutative Fluxes, Annals Phys.322(2007) 236 [hep-th/0605200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  65. [65]

    Christensen, I

    F.B. Christensen, I. García Etxebarria and E. Leung,Anomaly-induced vanishing of brane partition functions,2510.19935

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Damia, R

    J.A. Damia, R. Argurio and E. Garcia-Valdecasas,Non-invertible defects in 5d, boundaries and holography,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 067 [2207.02831]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Choi, H.T

    Y. Choi, H.T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Non-invertible Gauss law and axions,JHEP09(2023) 067 [2212.04499]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Bonetti, R

    F. Bonetti, R. Minasian, V.V. Camell and P. Weck,Consistent truncations from the geometry of sphere bundles,JHEP05(2023) 156 [2212.08068]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu, C.N. Pope, A. Sadrzadeh and T.A. Tran,Consistent SO(6) reduction of type IIB supergravity on S**5,Nucl. Phys. B586(2000) 275 [hep-th/0003103]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  70. [70]

    Pilch and N.P

    K. Pilch and N.P. Warner,N=2 supersymmetric RG flows and the IIB dilaton,Nucl. Phys. B594(2001) 209 [hep-th/0004063]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  71. [71]

    Cassani, G

    D. Cassani, G. Dall’Agata and A.F. Faedo,Type IIB supergravity on squashed Sasaki-Einstein manifolds,JHEP05(2010) 094 [1003.4283]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  72. [72]

    J.T. Liu, P. Szepietowski and Z. Zhao,Consistent massive truncations of IIB supergravity on Sasaki-Einstein manifolds,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 124028 [1003.5374]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  73. [73]

    Gauntlett and O

    J.P. Gauntlett and O. Varela,Universal Kaluza-Klein reductions of type IIB to N=4 supergravity in five dimensions,JHEP06(2010) 081 [1003.5642]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  74. [74]

    Baguet, O

    A. Baguet, O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,Consistent Type IIB Reductions to Maximal 5D Supergravity,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 065004 [1506.01385]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  75. [75]

    Gunaydin, L.J

    M. Gunaydin, L.J. Romans and N.P. Warner,Gauged N=8 Supergravity in Five-Dimensions,Phys. Lett. B154(1985) 268

    1985

  76. [76]

    Pernici, K

    M. Pernici, K. Pilch and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Gauged N=8 D=5 Supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B259(1985) 460

    1985

  77. [77]

    Gunaydin, L.J

    M. Gunaydin, L.J. Romans and N.P. Warner,Compact and Noncompact Gauged Supergravity Theories in Five-Dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B272(1986) 598

    1986

  78. [78]

    Freedman, S.D

    D.Z. Freedman, S.D. Mathur, A. Matusis and L. Rastelli,Correlation functions in the CFT(d) / AdS(d+1) correspondence,Nucl. Phys. B546(1999) 96 [hep-th/9804058]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  79. [79]

    Barnes, E

    E. Barnes, E. Gorbatov, K.A. Intriligator and J. Wright,Current correlators and AdS/CFT geometry,Nucl. Phys. B732(2006) 89 [hep-th/0507146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  80. [80]

    Benvenuti, L.A

    S. Benvenuti, L.A. Pando Zayas and Y. Tachikawa,Triangle anomalies from Einstein manifolds,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.10(2006) 395 [hep-th/0601054]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

Showing first 80 references.