pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.30354 · v1 · pith:XH34PWGWnew · submitted 2026-05-28 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.DG· math.MP· math.RT

Quiver Approach to Symmetry Theories

Vivek Chakrabhavi , Mirjam Cveti\v{c} , Jonathan J. Heckman , Shani Meynet This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 06:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.DGmath.MPmath.RT
keywords 5D SCFTsSymmetry theoriesQuiver path algebraCalabi-Yau conesM-theoryAnomaliesToric geometry
0
0 comments X

The pith

The path algebra of branes probing a Calabi-Yau cone encodes global symmetry anomalies of the associated 5D SCFT.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that global symmetry anomalies of 5D superconformal field theories from M-theory on a Calabi-Yau cone X can be read off from the path algebra of the quiver of branes probing X. This algebraic extraction supplies the same data that geometric methods obtain from triple intersection numbers in a resolution or from eta-invariants on the boundary manifold. The method is presented as useful precisely when those geometric quantities are unknown or combinatorially difficult to obtain. Concrete checks are performed on toric threefold examples, including orbifolds of C^3 and non-orbifold Sasaki-Einstein cones.

Core claim

For 5D SCFTs engineered from M-theory backgrounds given by a Calabi-Yau cone X, the global symmetry anomaly data packaged as couplings of a higher-dimensional symmetry theory can be extracted from the path algebra of branes probing X, equivalently to explicit geometric computations.

What carries the argument

The path algebra of the quiver associated to branes probing the Calabi-Yau cone X, which carries the global symmetry anomaly data.

If this is right

  • The algebraic method applies when geometric computations are unknown or combinatorially unwieldy.
  • It covers toric threefold examples including orbifolds of C^3 by finite groups.
  • It covers non-orbifold Calabi-Yau cones of Sasaki-Einstein five-manifolds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The quiver method could be tested on further non-toric examples to check consistency beyond the cases shown.
  • Algebraic extraction might reduce the computational cost of anomaly calculations in string compactifications where resolutions become intractable.

Load-bearing premise

The path algebra of the quiver encodes the global symmetry anomaly data equivalently to computations from triple intersections or eta-invariants.

What would settle it

For any specific Calabi-Yau cone where both methods are feasible, compute the anomaly coefficients from the path algebra and from the resolved geometry or boundary eta-invariant and verify numerical agreement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.30354 by Jonathan J. Heckman, Mirjam Cveti\v{c}, Shani Meynet, Vivek Chakrabhavi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The anomaly inflow / SymTFT slab picture. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: To account for strings which stretch off to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Quiver for D-brane probe of C 3/Z3. The quiver has three nodes corresponding to three irreducible representations of Z3 and bifundamental matter connecting each node. one obtains H(t) =   − 1 + 7t 3 + t 6 (−1 + t 3 ) 3 − 3(t + 2t 4 ) (−1 + t 3 ) 3 − 3t 2 (2 + t 3 ) (−1 + t 3 ) 3 − 3t 2 (2 + t 3 ) (−1 + t 3 ) 3 − 1 + 7t 3 + t 6 (−1 + t 3 ) 3 − 3(t + 2t 4 ) (−1 + t 3 ) 3 − 3(t + 2t 4 ) (−1 + t 3 ) … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quiver associated to the orbifold geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Quiver associated to the orbifold geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Quiver associated to the orbifold geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Quiver for D-brane probe of X = Cone(Y 4,2 ). a-maximization [97]. This yields [105, 106]: y(4, 2) = 3 2  −3 + √ 13 , (5.49) z(4, 2) = 1 2  −17 + 5√ 13 , (5.50) u(4, 2) = 2  4 − √ 13 , (5.51) v(4, 2) = 1 2  −1 + √ 13 . (5.52) In this case, the defect group is: D = Tor Coker(B) = Z2 ⊕ Z2, (5.53) which agrees with [61].22 With this in hand, we can extract the quiver matrix Hilbert series from (3.3).2… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Quiver for D-brane probe of X = Cone(Y 6,3 ). See figure 8 for the quiver. Here y(6, 3) = 1 18  −81 + 27√ 13 , (5.58) z(6, 3) = 1 18  −153 + 45√ 13 , (5.59) u(6, 3) = 2 3  12 − 3 √ 13 , (5.60) v(6, 3) = 1 6  −3 + 3√ 13 . (5.61) In this case, the defect group is: D = Tor Coker(B) = Z3 ⊕ Z3, (5.62) which agrees with the result of [61].24. With this in hand, we can extract the quiver matrix Hilbert se… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Quiver for D-brane probe of X = Cone(Y 6,6 ) = C 3/Z12. 0 1 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 u v u v u v u v u v u y y y y y y y y y y y z [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Quiver for D-brane probe of X = Cone(Y 6,5 ). 49 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Action of the quantum symmetry on C 3/Z6. The nodes are labeles as the irre￾ducible representations of Z6 and the symmetry is implemented by tensoring each node with the the desired irrep. torsion.28 For an orbifold of the form X = C 3 /Γ, Γ = ZN (n1, n2, n3) × ZM(m1, m2, m3), (D.1) discrete torsion is specified by a choice of class δ ∈ H 2 (Γ, U(1)). (D.2) Physically, this may be viewed as turning on a f… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Quiver associated to the geometry C 3/Z8(2, 1, 5)×Z2(1, 0, 1) with discrete torsion or equivalently C 3/Z4(2, 1, 1) without discrete torsion. quiver Hilbert series: H(t) =   − t 6−t 5+t 4+2t 3+t 2−t+1 (t−1)3(t 3+t 2+t+1)2 − 2t(t(t 2+t−1)+1) (t−1)3(t 3+t 2+t+1)2 − t(t(t(t(t+2)−2)+2)+1) (t−1)3(t 3+t 2+t+1)2 − 2t 2 (t 3−t 2+t+1) (t−1)3(t 3+t 2+t+1)2 − 2t 2 (t 3−t 2+t+1) (t−1)3(t 3+t 2+t+1)2 − t 6… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Global symmetry anomalies of a quantum field theory (QFT) can be packaged as specific couplings of a higher-dimensional symmetry theory (SymTh). In this work we show that for 5D superconformal field theories (SCFTs) engineered from M-theory backgrounds $X$ a Calabi-Yau cone, this data can be extracted from the path algebra of branes probing $X$. This provides a complementary algebraic approach compared with more geometric computations based on the explicit calculation of triple intersection numbers in a resolved geometry and / or $\eta$-invariants extracted from the boundary geometry $\partial X$. Our method applies in situations where the counterpart geometric computation is either unknown or combinatorially unwieldy. We illustrate with several toric threefold examples, including orbifolds $\mathbb{C}^{3} / \Gamma$ and more general non-orbifold Calabi-Yau cones of Sasaki-Einstein five-manifolds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that for 5D SCFTs engineered from M-theory on a Calabi-Yau cone X, global symmetry anomaly data packaged in a higher-dimensional SymTh can be extracted from the path algebra of the quiver associated to branes probing X. This algebraic method is presented as complementary to geometric computations of triple intersection numbers in resolved geometries or eta-invariants on the boundary ∂X, and is illustrated on toric threefold examples including orbifolds ℂ³/Γ and non-orbifold Sasaki-Einstein cones.

Significance. If the equivalence between the path-algebra extraction and the geometric anomaly data holds, the approach supplies a useful computational alternative precisely when resolutions are unknown or combinatorially expensive, extending the toolkit for symmetry anomalies in 5D SCFTs. The explicit toric illustrations and the parameter-free algebraic character of the construction are strengths.

major comments (1)
  1. [abstract, §1] The central claim that the path algebra encodes the same anomaly data as triple intersections or η-invariants (abstract and §1) requires an explicit statement of the dictionary between generators of the path algebra and the anomaly coefficients; without this dictionary the equivalence remains formal rather than operational.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the path algebra and its relations should be introduced with a short self-contained paragraph before the first toric example.
  2. [§4] The toric examples would benefit from a table comparing the algebraic anomaly coefficients with the known geometric values for at least one case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive suggestion. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [abstract, §1] The central claim that the path algebra encodes the same anomaly data as triple intersections or η-invariants (abstract and §1) requires an explicit statement of the dictionary between generators of the path algebra and the anomaly coefficients; without this dictionary the equivalence remains formal rather than operational.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit dictionary between the path-algebra generators and the anomaly coefficients would make the equivalence operational rather than formal. In the revised manuscript we will add a short subsection (placed after the definition of the path algebra in §2) that states the precise correspondence: the basis elements of the path algebra associated to the fractional branes map to the generators of the SymTh, the relations in the quiver encode the anomaly inflow, and the resulting algebraic invariants are identified with the triple-intersection numbers and boundary η-invariants. The mapping will be tabulated for the toric examples already treated in the paper. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; algebraic method presented as independent complement to geometry

full rationale

The abstract and available description frame the path-algebra extraction as a complementary algebraic route to the same anomaly data, without any indication that the algebraic quantities are defined in terms of the geometric ones (triple intersections or eta-invariants) or obtained by fitting. No self-citations, ansatze, or fitted-input predictions are referenced in the provided text. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external geometric benchmarks, consistent with the default expectation that most papers exhibit no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or detailed axioms are stated beyond the core domain assumption that the path algebra encodes the anomaly data.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The path algebra of branes probing the Calabi-Yau cone encodes the symmetry anomaly data of the 5D SCFT.
    This is the central premise that allows the algebraic extraction to replace geometric calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5702 in / 1187 out tokens · 25235 ms · 2026-06-29T06:11:36.880799+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

137 extracted references · 125 canonical work pages · 66 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,”JHEP02(2015) 172,arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Notes on generalized global symmetries in QFT

    E. Sharpe, “Notes on generalized global symmetries in QFT,”Fortsch. Phys.63 (2015) 659–682,arXiv:1508.04770 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,

    J. McGreevy, “Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,”arXiv:2204.03045 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Introduction to topological symmetry in QFT,

    D. S. Freed, “Introduction to topological symmetry in QFT,”arXiv:2212.00195 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  5. [5]

    An introduction to higher-form symmetries,

    P. R. S. Gomes, “An introduction to higher-form symmetries,”SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes74(2023) 1,arXiv:2303.01817 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics,

    T. D. Brennan and S. Hong, “Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics,”arXiv:2306.00912 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    Lectures on Generalized Symmetries

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim, “Lectures on Generalized Symmetries,” arXiv:2307.07547 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    What's Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries

    S.-H. Shao, “What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetry,”arXiv:2308.00747 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Simons Lectures on Categorical Symmetries,

    D. Costaet al., “Simons Lectures on Categorical Symmetries,”arXiv:2411.09082 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Introduction to Generalized Symmetries,

    J. Kaidi, “Introduction to Generalized Symmetries,”arXiv:2603.08798 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Relative quantum field theory

    D. S. Freed and C. Teleman, “Relative quantum field theory,”Commun. Math. Phys. 326(2014) 459–476,arXiv:1212.1692 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Invariants of three manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups,

    N. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev, “Invariants of three manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups,”Invent. Math.103(1991) 547–597

    1991

  13. [13]

    State sum invariants of 3 manifolds and quantum 6j symbols,

    V. Turaev and O. Y. Viro, “State sum invariants of 3 manifolds and quantum 6j symbols,”Topology31(1992) 865–902

    1992

  14. [14]

    Invariants of Piecewise-Linear 3-Manifolds

    J. W. Barrett and B. W. Westbury, “Invariants of piecewise linear three manifolds,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc.348(1996) 3997–4022,arXiv:hep-th/9311155

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  15. [15]

    AdS/CFT Correspondence And Topological Field Theory

    E. Witten, “AdS/CFT correspondence and topological field theory.,”JHEP12 (1998) 012,arXiv:hep-th/9812012. 56

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  16. [16]

    TFT construction of RCFT correlators I: Partition functions

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, “TFT construction of RCFT correlators 1. Partition functions,”Nucl. Phys. B646(2002) 353–497,arXiv:hep-th/0204148

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  17. [17]

    Turaev-Viro invariants as an extended TQFT

    A. Kirillov, Jr. and B. Balsam, “Turaev-Viro invariants as an extended TQFT,” arXiv:1004.1533 [math.GT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Surface operators in 3d Topological Field Theory and 2d Rational Conformal Field Theory

    A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, “Surface operators in 3d Topological Field Theory and 2d Rational Conformal Field Theory,”arXiv:1012.0911 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls,

    A. Kitaev and L. Kong, “Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls,” Communications in Mathematical Physics313no. 2, (June, 2012) 351–373

    2012

  20. [20]

    Bicategories for boundary conditions and for surface defects in 3-d TFT

    J. Fuchs, C. Schweigert, and A. Valentino, “Bicategories for boundary conditions and for surface defects in 3-d TFT,”Commun. Math. Phys.321(2013) 543–575, arXiv:1203.4568 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    Topological dualities in the Ising model,

    D. S. Freed and C. Teleman, “Topological dualities in the Ising model,”Geom. Topol. 26(2022) 1907–1984,arXiv:1806.00008 [math.AT]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Topological symmetry in quantum field theory

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, “Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,”arXiv:2209.07471 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    6D Fractional Quantum Hall Effect

    J. J. Heckman and L. Tizzano, “6D Fractional Quantum Hall Effect,”JHEP05 (2018) 120,arXiv:1708.02250 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Orbifold groupoids,

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, “Orbifold groupoids,”JHEP02(2021) 132, arXiv:2008.05960 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Symmetry TFTs from String Theory

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,”Commun. Math. Phys.402no. 1, (2023) 895–949,arXiv:2112.02092 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects,

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects,” Commun. Math. Phys.404no. 2, (2023) 1021–1124,arXiv:2209.11062 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    A SymTFT for continuous symmetries,

    T. D. Brennan and Z. Sun, “A SymTFT for continuous symmetries,”JHEP12 (2024) 100,arXiv:2401.06128 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    On the symmetry TFT of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory,

    R. Argurio, F. Benini, M. Bertolini, G. Galati, and P. Niro, “On the symmetry TFT of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory,”JHEP07(2024) 130,arXiv:2404.06601 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Remarks on geometric engineering, symmetry TFTs and anomalies,

    M. Del Zotto, S. N. Meynet, and R. Moscrop, “Remarks on geometric engineering, symmetry TFTs and anomalies,”JHEP07(2024) 220,arXiv:2402.18646 [hep-th]. 57

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    SymTh for non-finite symmetries,

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bedogna, and N. Dondi, “SymTh for non-finite symmetries,”JHEP 04(2026) 153,arXiv:2402.14813 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    The holography of non-invertible self-duality symmetries,

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “The holography of non-invertible self-duality symmetries,”JHEP03(2025) 052,arXiv:2210.09146 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Intermediate defect groups, polarization pairs, and noninvertible duality defects,

    C. Lawrie, X. Yu, and H. Y. Zhang, “Intermediate defect groups, polarization pairs, and noninvertible duality defects,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 2, (2024) 026005, arXiv:2306.11783 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    SymTrees and Multi-Sector QFTs,

    F. Baume, J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, E. Torres, A. P. Turner, and X. Yu, “SymTrees and Multi-Sector QFTs,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 10, (2024) 106013, arXiv:2310.12980 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Noninvertible symmetries in 2D from type IIB string theory,

    X. Yu, “Noninvertible symmetries in 2D from type IIB string theory,”Phys. Rev. D 110no. 6, (2024) 065008,arXiv:2310.15339 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries,

    A. Antinucci and F. Benini, “Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries,”Phys. Rev. B111no. 2, (2025) 024110,arXiv:2401.10165 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Celestial Topology, Symmetry Theories, and Evidence for a NonSUSY D3-Brane CFT,

    J. J. Heckman and M. H¨ ubner, “Celestial Topology, Symmetry Theories, and Evidence for a NonSUSY D3-Brane CFT,”Fortsch. Phys.73no. 4, (2025) 2400270, arXiv:2406.08485 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Generalized symmetries in 2D from string theory: SymTFTs, intrinsic relativeness, and anomalies of non-invertible symmetries,

    S. Franco and X. Yu, “Generalized symmetries in 2D from string theory: SymTFTs, intrinsic relativeness, and anomalies of non-invertible symmetries,”JHEP11(2024) 004,arXiv:2404.19761 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    SymTFTs forU(1) symmetries from descent,

    F. Gagliano and I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, “SymTFTs forU(1) symmetries from descent,”arXiv:2411.15126 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Cornering relative symmetry theories,

    M. Cvetiˇ c, R. Donagi, J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, and E. Torres, “Cornering relative symmetry theories,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 8, (2025) 085026,arXiv:2408.12600 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Representation Theory of Solitons

    C. Cordova, N. Holfester, and K. Ohmori, “Representation theory of solitons,”JHEP 06(2025) 001,arXiv:2408.11045 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    SymTFTs for continuous non-Abelian symmetries,

    F. Bonetti, M. Del Zotto, and R. Minasian, “SymTFTs for continuous non-Abelian symmetries,”Phys. Lett. B871(2025) 140010,arXiv:2402.12347 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Boundary SymTFT,

    L. Bhardwaj, C. Copetti, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Boundary SymTFT,” SciPost Phys.19no. 2, (2025) 061,arXiv:2409.02166 [hep-th]. 58

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Symmetry Topological Field Theory for Flavor Symmetry,

    Q. Jia, R. Luo, J. Tian, Y.-N. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “Symmetry Topological Field Theory for Flavor Symmetry,”arXiv:2503.04546 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    Gauging in parameter space: A top-down perspective,

    X. Yu, “Gauging in parameter space: A top-down perspective,”Phys. Rev. D112 no. 2, (2025) 025020,arXiv:2411.14997 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Aspects of categorical symmetries from branes: SymTFTs and generalized charges,

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, D. S. W. Gould, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Aspects of categorical symmetries from branes: SymTFTs and generalized charges,”SciPost Phys.17no. 1, (2024) 025,arXiv:2306.16405 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    SymTFT construction of gapless exotic-foliated dual models

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bedogna, and S. Mancani, “SymTFT construction of gapless exotic-foliated dual models,”arXiv:2504.11449 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    On the holographic dual of a topological symmetry operator,

    J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, and C. Murdia, “On the holographic dual of a topological symmetry operator,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 4, (2024) 046007,arXiv:2401.09538 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Symmetry theories, Wigner’s function, compactification, and holography,

    J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, and C. Murdia, “Symmetry theories, Wigner’s function, compactification, and holography,”Phys. Rev. D113no. 2, (2026) 026003, arXiv:2505.23887 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    Symmetry TFTs for Continuous Spacetime Symmetries,

    F. Apruzzi, N. Dondi, I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, H. T. Lam, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Symmetry TFTs for Continuous Spacetime Symmetries,”arXiv:2509.07965 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    SymTFT Entanglement and Holographic (Non)-Factorization,

    E. Torres and X. Yu, “SymTFT Entanglement and Holographic (Non)-Factorization,”arXiv:2510.06319 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    On the SymTFTs of Finite Non-Abelian Symmetries

    O. Bergman, J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, D. Migliorati, X. Yu, and H. Y. Zhang, “On the SymTFTs of Finite Non-Abelian Symmetries,”arXiv:2603.12323 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    On Lagrangians of Non-abelian Dijkgraaf-Witten Theories

    Y. Xue and E. Y. Yang, “On Lagrangians of Non-abelian Dijkgraaf-Witten Theories,”arXiv:2604.02414 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    Candidate Gaugings of Categorical Continuous Symmetry

    Q. Jia, C. Ma, and J. Tian, “Candidate Gaugings of Categorical Continuous Symmetry,”arXiv:2604.25820 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Categorical Symmetries via Operator Algebras

    Q. Jia, R. Luo, J. Tian, Y.-N. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “Categorical Symmetries via Operator Algebras,”arXiv:2604.25821 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Metric isometries, holography, and continuous symmetry operators,

    M. Cvetiˇ c, J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, and C. Murdia, “Metric isometries, holography, and continuous symmetry operators,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 10, (2025) 106020,arXiv:2501.17911 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Symmetries beyond branes: geometric engineering and isometries,

    M. De Marco and S. N. Meynet, “Symmetries beyond branes: geometric engineering and isometries,”JHEP08(2025) 082,arXiv:2503.19022 [hep-th]. 59

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    The Topological Equivalence Principle: On Decoupling TFTs from Gravity,

    C. Cummings and J. J. Heckman, “The Topological Equivalence Principle: On Decoupling TFTs from Gravity,”arXiv:2601.09781 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Generalized Complexity Distances and Non-Invertible Symmetries

    J. J. Heckman, R. J. Hicks, and C. Murdia, “Generalized Complexity Distances and Non-Invertible Symmetries,”arXiv:2604.14275 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    From Baby Universes to Narain Moduli: Topological Boundary Averaging in SymTFTs

    X. Yu, “From Baby Universes to Narain Moduli: Topological Boundary Averaging in SymTFTs,”arXiv:2605.06653 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    On the Defect Group of a 6D SCFT

    M. Del Zotto, J. J. Heckman, D. S. Park, and T. Rudelius, “On the Defect Group of a 6D SCFT,”Lett. Math. Phys.106no. 6, (2016) 765–786,arXiv:1503.04806 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  61. [61]

    Higher Form Symmetries and M-theory,

    F. Albertini, M. Del Zotto, I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, and S. S. Hosseini, “Higher Form Symmetries and M-theory,”JHEP12(2020) 203,arXiv:2005.12831 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Higher-Form Symmetries in 5d,

    D. R. Morrison, S. Schafer-Nameki, and B. Willett, “Higher-Form Symmetries in 5d,” JHEP09(2020) 024,arXiv:2005.12296 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    Noninvertible Symmetries from Holography and Branes,

    F. Apruzzi, I. Bah, F. Bonetti, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Noninvertible Symmetries from Holography and Branes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.130no. 12, (2023) 121601, arXiv:2208.07373 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Branes and Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, “Branes and Non-Invertible Symmetries,”Fortsch. Phys.70 no. 11, (2022) 2200154,arXiv:2208.07508 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    The Branes Behind Generalized Symmetry Operators,

    J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, E. Torres, and H. Y. Zhang, “The Branes Behind Generalized Symmetry Operators,”Fortsch. Phys.71no. 1, (2023) 2200180, arXiv:2209.03343 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Top down approach to topological duality defects,

    J. J. Heckman, M. Hubner, E. Torres, X. Yu, and H. Y. Zhang, “Top down approach to topological duality defects,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 4, (2023) 046015, arXiv:2212.09743 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Fluxbranes, generalized symmetries, and Verlinde’s metastable monopole,

    M. Cvetiˇ c, J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, and E. Torres, “Fluxbranes, generalized symmetries, and Verlinde’s metastable monopole,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 4, (2024) 046007,arXiv:2305.09665 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Non-BPS branes and continuous symmetries,

    O. Bergman, E. Garcia-Valdecasas, F. Mignosa, and D. Rodriguez-Gomez, “Non-BPS branes and continuous symmetries,”JHEP02(2025) 066,arXiv:2407.00773 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Non-Abelian Symmetry Operators from Hanging Branes inAdS 5 ×S 5,

    I. Bah, F. Bonetti, M. Chitoto, and E. Leung, “Non-Abelian Symmetry Operators from Hanging Branes inAdS 5 ×S 5,”arXiv:2510.19812 [hep-th]. 60

    work page arXiv

  70. [70]

    Continuous symmetries and charge measurement of boundary operators in holography,

    I. Bah, F. Bonetti, M. Chitoto, and E. Leung, “Continuous symmetries and charge measurement of boundary operators in holography,”arXiv:2602.22377 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    Extra-Dimensional η-Invariants and Anomaly Theories,

    M. Cvetiˇ c, R. Donagi, J. J. Heckman, and M. H¨ ubner, “Extra-Dimensional η-Invariants and Anomaly Theories,”arXiv:2512.17906 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  72. [72]

    Higher symmetries of 5D orbifold SCFTs,

    M. Del Zotto, J. J. Heckman, S. N. Meynet, R. Moscrop, and H. Y. Zhang, “Higher symmetries of 5D orbifold SCFTs,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 4, (2022) 046010, arXiv:2201.08372 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Global structures from the infrared,

    M. Del Zotto and I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria, “Global structures from the infrared,”JHEP 11(2023) 058,arXiv:2204.06495 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    Equivalence of A-Maximization and Volume Minimization

    R. Eager, “Equivalence of A-Maximization and Volume Minimization,”JHEP01 (2014) 089,arXiv:1011.1809 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  75. [75]

    Sasaki-Einstein Manifolds and Volume Minimisation

    D. Martelli, J. Sparks, and S.-T. Yau, “Sasaki-Einstein manifolds and volume minimisation,”Commun. Math. Phys.280(2008) 611–673,arXiv:hep-th/0603021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  76. [76]

    Eta-invariants from molien series,

    A. Degeratu, “Eta-invariants from molien series,”The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics60no. 3, (06, 2008) 303–311

    2008

  77. [77]

    Sasaki-Einstein Metrics on S^2 x S^3

    J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, J. Sparks, and D. Waldram, “Sasaki-Einstein metrics on S2 ×S 3,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.8no. 4, (2004) 711–734,arXiv:hep-th/0403002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  78. [78]

    The eta invariant of a circle bundle on a Fano manifold

    N. Savale, “The eta invariant of a circle bundle on a fano manifold,” arXiv:2604.07556 [math.DG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [79]

    Five Dimensional SUSY Field Theories, Non-trivial Fixed Points and String Dynamics

    N. Seiberg, “Five-dimensional SUSY field theories, nontrivial fixed points and string dynamics,”Phys. Lett. B388(1996) 753–760,arXiv:hep-th/9608111

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  80. [80]

    Small Instantons, del Pezzo Surfaces and Type I' theory

    M. R. Douglas, S. H. Katz, and C. Vafa, “Small Instantons, Del Pezzo Surfaces and Type I′ Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B497(1997) 155–172,arXiv:hep-th/9609071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

Showing first 80 references.