Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 137 references

3D-Herschel: Constraining Dust Emission with Panchromatic Modeling of 3D-HST Galaxies

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Adding far-infrared Herschel data to galaxy SED fits leaves the star-forming main sequence unchanged but reveals that mid-infrared-to-total-infrared conversions depend on stellar mass.

desk verdict Useful new public catalog, but the SFMS validation is partly circular; the mass-dependent F_TIR/F7.7 result is the real news and needs a no-prior test. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.22384 v2 pith:FSVCD5A6 submitted 2026-02-25 astro-ph.GA

Seamus McNulty , Mimi Song , Katherine E. Whitaker , Joel Leja , Aubrey Medrano , Elijah P. Mathews , Mark Dickinson , Hanae Inami
show 4 more authors
Ivo Labbe Danilo Marchesini Alexandra Pope Irene Shivaei
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxies:photometryfundamentalparametersinfrared:galaxiesdustextinctionstarformationstar-formingmainsequencefar-infraredspectralenergydistributionfitting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a new public 0.3-350 micron photometric catalog for 41,387 galaxies and shows that adding Herschel far-infrared constraints to a flexible 17-parameter Bayesian spectral-energy-distribution fit does not shift the star-forming main sequence relative to fits using only ultraviolet-to-mid-infrared data. The average deviation between the two inferred sequences is 0.1±0.07 dex, supporting earlier claims that the low normalization of the sequence is not a side effect of missing far-infrared measurements. However, for the 3.2% of galaxies with strong Herschel detections in at least two bands, the fixed infrared templates used in UV-MIR-only fits prove inadequate: they imply dust temperatures about 7 K colder and, at stellar masses near 10^9.6 solar masses, total-infrared-to-7.7-micron ratios about 0.2 dex lower than fits that include the far-infrared data. The paper concludes that conversions from mid-infrared to total infrared luminosity depend on stellar mass and cautions against mass-independent templates.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing piece is a new 0.3-350 micron photometric catalog, 3D-Herschel, built by deblending low-resolution Herschel imaging with forced photometry that uses high-resolution HST positions and UV-MIR-model flux predictions as priors. On top of this catalog, the analysis compares two configurations of a 17-parameter Bayesian SED fitting framework with nonparametric star-formation history, two-component dust attenuation, and energy-balance dust re-emission: one using only UV-24 micron data with the dust-emission parameters fixed to log-average template colors, and one adding Herschel data with the three dust-emission parameters (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mass fraction, minimum rad

What would settle it

Extract the same Herschel imaging with uninformative (flat) flux priors for the IR-bright sample and rerun the fits; if the total-infrared-to-7.7-micron excess at log(M*/M_sun)~9.6 disappears, the mass-dependent offset is an artifact of prior-driven deblending. Independently, JWST/MIRI measurements of 7.7 micron fluxes for the same galaxies would confirm or refute the suppressed PAH strength at low mass.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, at least for the bulk of the mass-complete population, SED fits that stop at 24 microns are not biased in their stellar masses, star-formation rates, or the shape of the star-forming main sequence: adding Herschel photometry moves the inferred SFR ridge by only 0.1±0.07 dex. The far-infrared data do matter, though, for the dust side of the model. When the three dust-emission parameters are allowed to vary, Herschel-constrained fits recover warmer characteristic dust temperatures (about 25 K versus 18.4 K for the fixed-template UV-MIR fits) and a higher total-infrared-to-7.7-micron ratio at low stellar mass (about 0.2 dex at log M* ~ 9.6). This mass dependen

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the assumption that the deblended Herschel fluxes are not shaped by the UV-MIR model predictions used as priors during extraction, because the same UV-MIR fits are then validated against those Herschel fluxes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Herschel-constrained star-forming main sequence deviates from UV-MIR-only fits by 0.1±0.07 dex at fixed stellar mass, so the low normalization of the sequence is not caused by missing far-infrared data.
  • Mid-infrared-only SFR and total infrared luminosity estimates using fixed templates will systematically underestimate total infrared luminosity for low-mass obscured galaxies, by about 0.2 dex near log(M*/M_sun)=9.6.
  • UV-MIR fits with fixed dust parameters imply dust temperatures about 7 K too cold, biasing dust-based interpretations of these galaxies.
  • The public 3D-Herschel catalog extends forced deblended photometry to 350 microns, allowing future work to include far-infrared constraints in SED fitting.
  • For galaxies below 10^11 solar masses at z > 1.5, Herschel can only provide upper limits after deblending; next-generation far-infrared telescopes are needed to measure their dust emission.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the Herschel extraction used UV-MIR model predictions as flux priors, the agreement between UV-MIR and UV-FIR fits may be partly inherited from those priors; a rerun with uninformative priors on the IR-bright subsample would test how much of the 0.2 dex total-infrared-to-7.7-micron offset is independent of the priors.
  • If the mass-dependent trend is driven by PAH destruction in strong radiation fields, the ratio should correlate with metallicity and radiation-field intensity at fixed stellar mass; that correlation is implicit but not directly tested here and is checkable with JWST/MIRI spectra of the same galaxies.
  • A direct prediction for future PRIMA-class observations is that the mass dependence of the mid-infrared-to-total-infrared conversion should become more pronounced at higher resolution, since Herschel's confusion limit hides the lowest-mass, dustiest systems.
  • The comparison with a JWST/MIRI study suggests part of the 7.7-micron offset may be a calibration issue; stacking deeper far-infrared data or using MIRI photometry for the same sample would decide whether the mass dependence persists.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents 3D-Herschel, a new 0.3–350 micron photometric catalog built by deblending Herschel imaging in the CANDELS/3D-HST fields with T-PHOT, using Prospector UV-MIR fits as flux priors. The authors fit 41,387 galaxies at 0.5<z<2.5 with a 17-parameter Prospector emulator, comparing fits with and without Herschel FIR data. They report that UV-MIR-only fits recover stellar masses, SFRs, and the star-forming main sequence for the majority of objects (SFMS agreement of 0.1±0.07 dex), but that fixed IR templates in UV-MIR fits give colder dust temperatures (18.4 K vs. 25.4 K) and underestimate F_TIR/F7.7 by ~0.2 dex at low stellar masses. They conclude that MIR-to-IR conversions depend on stellar mass and that Herschel provides mostly upper limits for distant low-mass galaxies.

Significance. If the results hold, this paper provides a valuable public UV-FIR catalog and one of the largest panchromatic SED-fitting samples at cosmic noon. The mass-dependent F_TIR/F7.7 trend would strengthen JWST/MIRI-based results and caution against fixed MIR-to-IR templates in SED modeling. The paper's strengths include the public data release, multi-field deblending with explicit PSF treatment, Monte Carlo error calibration, external flux validation, and the use of a validated emulator. These assets make the study a useful reference for future FIR and JWST analyses, provided the independence of the FIR photometry from the models being validated is demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2.1, §5, §6.2] The central validation claim — that UV-MIR Prospector fits recover the SFMS unchanged when FIR data are added — is weakened by a circularity in the photometric pipeline. T-PHOT fluxes are extracted with Gaussian priors derived directly from Prospector UV-MIR fits (§2.2.1), and the same extracted fluxes are used in §5 and §6.2 to validate those fits and to measure the 0.1±0.07 dex SFMS agreement. For the >90% of the mass-limited sample that are Herschel upper limits (SNR<3), the data cannot dominate the priors, so agreement between with- and without-Herschel fits is partly by construction. The statement in §2.2.3 that S/N<1 sources are driven to noise-consistent fluxes is not supported by a quantitative test. Please add an extraction test with uninformative or no flux priors on a representative subset, and report how the SFMS and IR-bright classifications change.
  2. [§6, Table 6, Figure 9] The headline F_TIR/F7.7 mass trend is measured on an IR-bright sample of 1118 objects defined after removing ~33% of candidates with chi^2<3 in PACS100/160, often attributed to 'bright interlopers contaminating the photometry of low-mass galaxies.' Because this cut is applied after fitting, it can imprint or exaggerate the low-mass trend. The paper does not report the number or mass distribution of rejected objects, nor whether the trend survives a less aggressive cut or an analysis that includes the rejected objects with inflated uncertainties. Please quantify the selection function and show the robustness of the F_TIR/F7.7 versus stellar mass result to the chi^2 threshold.
  3. [§7.5, Figure 9] The comparison with Shivaei et al. (2024) shows a ~0.28 dex offset in F_TIR/F7.7 at high stellar masses, which the paper attributes to differences in the U_min prior and possible calibration issues. However, the same section reports that model MIPS 24 micron fluxes are ~0.1 dex below observed fluxes, and the paper states this does not fully explain the discrepancy. Since F_TIR/F7.7 is a main physical conclusion, this unresolved systematic should be tested explicitly — for example, by recomputing F7.7 with the observed 24 micron flux as a constraint, or by adopting the Shivaei et al. U_min prior and showing how the mass trend changes.
minor comments (6)
  1. [General] The running header says 'McNulty et al. 2024' while the paper is dated 2026; update for consistency.
  2. [Eq. (3) and §6.3] Equation (3) defines R_SB but the text refers to R_MS > 2; use one notation consistently.
  3. [§6] State explicitly which model (with or without Herschel) is used to compute the chi^2<3 cut, and report how many objects are removed per field and per mass bin.
  4. [Figure 9] The caption says the dashed line marks the Shivaei et al. relation, but §7.5 describes a 0.28 dex offset relative to that relation; clarify what is plotted.
  5. [Figure 8] The bottom-row axis label 'Delta log(SFR IR Bright)' is difficult to parse; use 'Delta log SFR (IR-bright)' or similar.
  6. [Data availability] The abstract and conclusions state that 3D-Herschel is publicly released, but no URL, DOI, or data-access footnote is provided; add one.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

SFMS validation is partially circular: Herschel photometry used to confirm UV-MIR fits is extracted with Gaussian priors from those same UV-MIR fits.

  1. self definitional [§2.2.1 (forced photometry), §5 (SFMS), §7.1 (Discussion)]
    "In the Herschel photometric extraction, we use T-PHOT (Merlin et al. 2015, 2016), incorporating FIR Prospector predictions and their uncertainties as Gaussian priors. ... Overall, Herschel data demonstrate that UV-MIR priors can reasonably predict FIR fluxes"

    The 'Herschel' photometry used to validate the UV-MIR Prospector fits is not independent: T-PHOT regularizes the extracted fluxes with Gaussian priors whose means come from those same UV-MIR fits (§2.2.1). For the ≳90% of the mass-limited sample that are Herschel upper limits, the data are uninformative and the prior dominates, so the extracted fluxes are pulled toward the UV-MIR predicted FIR fluxes. Refitting these fluxes with the same Prospector model then trivially reproduces the UV-MIR SFRs, making the quoted 0.1±0.07 dex SFMS agreement between UV-MIR and UV-FIR fits an artifact of the prior construction rather than an independent confirmation. The paper's claim in §2.2.3 that S/N<1 sources are 'driven toward fluxes consistent with the image noise rather than the prior model values' i

full rationale

The paper's central SFMS validation is partially circular: the Herschel photometry that is added to the UV-MIR fits is extracted using T-PHOT with Gaussian flux priors taken from the very Prospector UV-MIR models being tested. Since most of the mass-limited sample consists of Herschel upper limits, those fluxes are prior-dominated, so the subsequent UV-FIR fits cannot provide an independent check of the UV-MIR SFMS. However, the photometry is also validated against external catalogs in §3, and the IR-bright subsample (SNR≥3 in ≥2 Herschel bands) provides some independent leverage, especially for the mass-dependent F_TIR/F7.7 result. The circularity is therefore partial—it weakens the SFMS confirmation but does not eliminate the paper's independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the Prospector SPS framework, the Draine & Li dust templates, and the assumption that the T-PHOT priors do not bias the extracted FIR fluxes. No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are the dust emission parameters (U_min, q_PAH, gamma) and empirical photometric error corrections.

free parameters (5)
  • U_min = U_min ≈ 7.1 ± 3.1 (posterior mean); fixed to 1 in UV-MIR fits
    Central to the reported ~7 K warmer dust temperatures in Herschel fits; free in FIR fits, fixed in UV-MIR fits.
  • q_PAH = fitted; fixed to 2 in UV-MIR fits
    PAH mass fraction controls MIR PAH strength and drives F_TIR/F7.7 comparisons.
  • gamma = fitted; fixed to 0.01 (Sec 4.1) or log gamma=2 (Sec 7.2, inconsistent)
    Fraction of dust exposed to high radiation fields; affects FIR dust bump shape.
  • SPIRE error correction a,b = 250: a=-0.56, b=2.11; 350: a=-0.64, b=2.62
    Empirical correction to SPIRE flux uncertainties derived from Monte Carlo simulations (Table 2).
  • PACS error scaling factor = not tabulated (scaled from residual widths)
    PACS uncertainties inflated by factor of ~2 to match residual maps; affects all FIR fits.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Draine & Li (2007) dust emission template framework
    The IR SED is parameterized by q_PAH, U_min, gamma (Section 4.2); all fits rely on this template family.
  • domain assumption Energy balance between attenuated starlight and dust emission
    Prospector assumes the UV-NIR light attenuated by dust is re-emitted as IR radiation (Section 4.1).
  • domain assumption Emulator reproduces Prospector posteriors
    The neural-network emulator is relied on for all fits; validated in Mathews et al. (2023) and Figure 3, but not formally proven.
  • domain assumption 3D-HST redshifts and photometry are correct
    The analysis inherits z_best from Momcheva et al. (2016) and the 3D-HST photometric catalogs (Section 2.1).
  • domain assumption Tal et al. (2014) mass completeness limits
    The mass-limited sample uses 90% completeness limits from Tal et al. (2014) (Table 5).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 3D-Herschel: Constraining Dust Emission with Panchromatic Modeling of 3D-HST Galaxies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FSVCD5A6

@misc{pith2026260222384,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 3D-Herschel: Constraining Dust Emission with Panchromatic Modeling of 3D-HST Galaxies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FSVCD5A6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.22384}
}
abstract

We present 3D-Herschel, a new publicly released 0.3-350$\mu$m photometric catalog that combines deblended Herschel far-infrared (FIR) imaging with the CANDELS/3D-HST legacy fields to probe the dust-obscured universe. Using the 17-parameter Bayesian fitting code Prospector-$\beta$, we model 41,387 galaxies spanning 0.5 $< z <$ 2.5 to measure stellar and dust properties. Comparing fits with and without FIR constraints, we find that for the 3.2$\%$ of galaxies with $>3 \sigma$ detections in $\geq2$ Herschel bands, UV-MIR-only models (0.3-24$\mu$m) recover robust stellar ages, SFRs, and stellar masses (50-70$\%$ within the median 1$\sigma$ error). Consequently, the Prospector-$\beta$ star-forming sequence is unchanged by the inclusion of FIR data (average deviation 0.1$\pm$0.07 dex between UV-MIR and UV-FIR fits at fixed stellar mass), confirming that the offset relative to UV+IR-based estimates reported by Leja et al. 2022 is robust to the lack of direct FIR constraints. However, the use of rigid log-average IR templates with fixed dust emission parameters ($\gamma$, $U_{\mathrm{min}}$, $q_{\mathrm{PAH}}$) in UV-MIR modeling yields cold dust temperatures ($\sim$7K colder than Herschel-informed fits at all redshifts) and an unevolving MIR-to-IR luminosity ratio, with $\sim$0.2 dex lower IR-to-7.7$\mu$m luminosity ratios at the low-mass end of Herschel-detected galaxies (log($M_{\star}$) $\sim$ 9.6 $M_{\odot}$). These results demonstrate that MIR-to-IR conversions depend on stellar mass, cautioning against $L_{\mathrm{IR}}$-independent templates without FIR data. For galaxies with $<10^{11} \ M_{\odot}$ at $z>1.5$, Herschel can at best provide upper limits due to source confusion; next-generation FIR telescopes will be essential for distant galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.22384 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overall agreement of 3D-Herschel fluxes compared to other published Herschel catalogs contained in the literature. The background color scale shows the logarithmic number density of sources in our sample. The dashed line indicates the median 3σ flux uncertainty from the original survey publications, whereas the dotted lines are the limits we infer herein for sources originally detected with Spitzer, as opposed to th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Close relationship between the number counts of each 3D-Herschel field (binned by flux) demonstrates that the photometric estimations were consistent across all fields. Error bars are determined as the fraction error of each bin (1/ √ N × N dex−1 deg−2 ). alogs are based on high-resolution imaging. For UDS, however, we use a 3 arcsecond radius, as sources are detected only at FIR wavelengths where positional un￾cert… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of posterior medians inferred from full Prospector fits of the adjusted 3D-HST catalog (Leja et al. 2019b; x-axis) versus our Prospector emulation on the publicly released 3D-HST catalog (y-axis). Panels show (a) stellar mass, (b) diffuse-dust attenuation, (c) stellar metallicity, (d) dust index, (e) SFR, and (f) mass-weighted age. The one-to-one line is in black and red lines show me￾dian offsets. The em… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparisons of fits with and without Herschel photometry, showing offsets (with - without Herschel) in 7 out of 17 of the inferred stellar parameters plotted against each other. Histograms of the offsets are shown above each column and at the end of the last row. Param…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Composite SEDs of the IR-bright sample from Prospector fits adding Herschel FIR photometry to the UV to MIR 3D-HST photometry (blue line), compared to fits without Herschel (purple line) and the z∼1 star-forming template of Kirkpatrick et al. (2012) (dashed line). Cros…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Offsets (with - without Herschel) in star formation rate (top row) and stellar mass (bottom row) as a function of mass-weighted age, diffuse dust, birthcloud dust, and stellar metallicity (left to right). Objects are color-coded as dustier and more star-forming (red) o…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Composite SEDs with (blue) and without Herschel photometry (purple), normalized at 1µm. The composites in the left panel are constructed from sources with diffuse dust and SFR offsets within their original 1σ uncertainties, while the right panel is created from IR-brig…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: IR-bright population (circles) overplotted on the SFMS of the mass-limited sample, inferred from UV-MIR fits (blue line) and from Herschel-constrained fits (red dashed line). The top row shows SFRs and stellar masses from UV-MIR fits, whereas the middle row shows the s…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Composites from the IR-bright sample, binned by stellar mass, with the fractional contribution of each bin to the total sample for that mass range noted in the top left. Median FTIR/F7.7 values of each composite are listed on the right, showing a decreasing trend with…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Characteristic dust temperature (Td,char; Equation 4) as a function of redshift for the IR-bright sam￾ple. Points are color-coded by Umin, with its distribution shown as a histogram along the color bar. Median reference lines mark the fixed Umin fits (dashed navy; 18.…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

137 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2021, ApJS, 254, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abebe2

    Abdurro’uf, Lin, Y.-T., Wu, P.-F., & Akiyama, M. 2021, ApJS, 254, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abebe2

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abebe2 2021

  2. [2]

    E., Gladders, M

    Abramson, L. E., Gladders, M. D., Dressler, A., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 801, L12, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/801/1/L12 26McNulty et al. 2024

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/801/1/l12 2015

  3. [3]

    2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 737, 47, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/47

    Acquaviva, V., Gawiser, E., & Guaita, L. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 737, 47, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/47

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/47 2011

  4. [4]

    2024, SMILES Initial Data Release: Unveiling the Obscured Universe with MIRI Multi-band Imaging

    Alberts, S., Lyu, J., Shivaei, I., et al. 2024, SMILES Initial Data Release: Unveiling the Obscured Universe with MIRI Multi-band Imaging. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15972

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Ashby, M. L. N., Willner, S. P., Fazio, G. G., et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 80, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/80 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/769/1/80 2013

  6. [6]

    S., Wechsler, R

    Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Conroy, C. 2013, ApJ, 770, 57, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/57

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/57 2013

  7. [7]

    J., et al

    Bielby, R., Hudelot, P., McCracken, H. J., et al. 2012, A&A, 545, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118547

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118547 2012

  8. [8]

    A., Brinchmann, J., Bouch´ e, N., et al

    Boogaard, L. A., Brinchmann, J., Bouch´ e, N., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833136

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833136 2018

Show all 137 references
  1. [9]

    2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    P., Zeimann, G

    Bowman, W. P., Zeimann, G. R., Nagaraj, G., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 899, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9f3c

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    B., van Dokkum, P

    Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., & Coppi, P. 2008, ApJ, 686, 1503, doi: 10.1086/591786

    2008 doi

  4. [12]

    B., S´ anchez-Janssen, R., Labb´ e, I., et al

    Brammer, G. B., S´ anchez-Janssen, R., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2012, ApJL, 758, L17, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/758/1/L17

    2012 doi

  5. [13]

    Brinchmann, J., & Ellis, R. S. 2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 536, L77, doi: 10.1086/312738

    2000 doi

  6. [14]

    2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 360, 1413, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09131.x

    Burgarella, D., Buat, V., & Iglesias-P´ aramo, J. 2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 360, 1413, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09131.x

    2005

  7. [15]

    C., Engelbracht, C

    Calzetti, D., Kennicutt, R. C., Engelbracht, C. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 666, 870, doi: 10.1086/520082

    2007 doi

  8. [16]

    L., Hu, E

    Capak, P., Cowie, L. L., Hu, E. M., et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 180, doi: 10.1086/380611

    2004 doi

  9. [17]

    N., van Dokkum, P

    Cardamone, C. N., van Dokkum, P. G., Urry, C. M., et al. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 189, 270, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/189/2/270

    2010 doi

  10. [18]

    C., Leja, J., Johnson, B

    Carnall, A. C., Leja, J., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 873, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab04a2

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Dav´ e, R. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 4379, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2169

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2001.11076, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2001.11076

    Carpenter, J., Iono, D., Kemper, F., & Wootten, A. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2001.11076, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2001.11076

    2020 doi arXiv

  13. [22]

    M., Hodge, J., Zavala, J

    Casey, C. M., Hodge, J., Zavala, J. A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 862, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aacd11

    2018 doi

  14. [23]

    A., Droettboom, M., Lee, A., et al

    Caswell, T. A., Droettboom, M., Lee, A., et al. 2020, matplotlib/matplotlib: REL: v3.2.1, v3.2.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3714460

    2020 doi

  15. [24]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    2003 doi

  16. [25]

    Charlot, S., & Fall, S. M. 2000, ApJ, 539, 718, doi: 10.1086/309250

    2000 doi

  17. [26]

    2013, ARA&A, 51, 393, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017

    Conroy, C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 393, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017

    2013 doi

  18. [27]

    E., & White, M

    Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E., & White, M. 2009, ApJ, 699, 486, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486 Da Cunha, E., Charlot, S., & Elbaz, D. 2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 388, 1595, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13535.x

    2009

  19. [28]

    2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 670, 156, doi: 10.1086/521818

    Daddi, E., Dickinson, M., Morrison, G., et al. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 670, 156, doi: 10.1086/521818

    2007 doi

  20. [29]

    A., & Helou, G

    Dale, D. A., & Helou, G. 2002, ApJ, 576, 159, doi: 10.1086/341632 Dav´ e, R., Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D., Narayanan, D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2827, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz937

    2002 doi

  21. [30]

    Dickinson, M., Giavalisco, M., & team, t. G. 2003, in The Mass of Galaxies at Low and High Redshift: Proceedings of the European Southern Observatory and Universit¨ ats-Sternwarte M¨ unchen Workshop Held in

    2003

  22. [31]

    Venice, Italy, 24-26 October 2001, Springer, 324–331

    2001

  23. [32]

    T., & Li, A

    Draine, B. T., & Li, A. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 657, 810, doi: 10.1086/511055

    2007 doi

  24. [33]

    T., Li, A., Hensley, B

    Draine, B. T., Li, A., Hensley, B. S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abff51

    2021 doi

  25. [34]

    T., Dale, D

    Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., Bendo, G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 866, doi: 10.1086/518306

    2007 doi

  26. [35]

    T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., et al

    Draine, B. T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 172, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/172

    2014 doi

  27. [36]

    2007, A&A, 468, 33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077525

    Elbaz, D., Daddi, E., Le Borgne, D., et al. 2007, A&A, 468, 33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077525

    2007 doi

  28. [37]

    S., et al

    Elbaz, D., Dickinson, M., Hwang, H. S., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, A119, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117239

    2011 doi

  29. [38]

    P., et al

    Erben, T., Schirmer, M., Dietrich, J. P., et al. 2005, Astronomische Nachrichten, 326, 432, doi: 10.1002/asna.200510396

    2005 doi

  30. [39]

    2009, A&A, 493, 1197, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810426

    Erben, T., Hildebrandt, H., Lerchster, M., et al. 2009, A&A, 493, 1197, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810426

    2009 doi

  31. [40]

    2014, python-fsps: Python bindings to FSPS (v0.1.1), v0.1.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12157

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Sick, J., & Johnson, B. 2014, python-fsps: Python bindings to FSPS (v0.1.1), v0.1.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12157

    2014 doi

  32. [41]

    Frenklach, M., & Feigelson, E. D. 1989, ApJ, 341, 372, doi: 10.1086/167501 Panchromatic SED Fitting of 3D-Herschel27

    1989 doi

  33. [42]

    G., et al

    Fumagalli, M., Labb´ e, I., Patel, S. G., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 35, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/35

    2014 doi

  34. [43]

    G., Theuns, T., et al

    Furlong, M., Bower, R. G., Theuns, T., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 4486, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv852

    2015 doi

  35. [44]

    2008, ApJS, 176, 1, doi: 10.1086/527321

    Furusawa, H., Kosugi, G., Akiyama, M., et al. 2008, ApJS, 176, 1, doi: 10.1086/527321

    2008 doi

  36. [45]

    2008, ApJ, 672, 214, doi: 10.1086/523621

    Galliano, F., Dwek, E., & Chanial, P. 2008, ApJ, 672, 214, doi: 10.1086/523621

    2008 doi

  37. [46]

    P., Mather, J

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Abbott, R., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 068001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5

    2023 doi

  38. [47]

    C., Koekemoer, A

    Giavalisco, M., Ferguson, H. C., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2004, ApJL, 600, L93, doi: 10.1086/379232

    2004 doi

  39. [48]

    A., Kocevski, D

    Grogin, N. A., Kocevski, D. D., Faber, S. M., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 35, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35

    2011 doi

  40. [49]

    2014, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 215, 2, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/215/1/2

    Han, Y., & Han, Z. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 215, 2, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/215/1/2

    2014 doi

  41. [50]

    C., & Smith, D

    Hayward, C. C., & Smith, D. J. B. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 1512, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2195

    2015 doi

  42. [51]

    2009, A&A, 498, 725, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811042

    Hildebrandt, H., Pielorz, J., Erben, T., et al. 2009, A&A, 498, 725, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811042

    2009 doi

  43. [52]

    P., et al

    Hildebrandt, H., Erben, T., Dietrich, J. P., et al. 2006, A&A, 452, 1121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054278 H¨ ofner, S., & Olofsson, H. 2018, A&A Rv, 26, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-017-0106-5

    2006 doi

  44. [53]

    2012, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 203, 23, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/203/2/23

    Hsieh, B.-C., Wang, W.-H., Hsieh, C.-C., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 203, 23, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/203/2/23

    2012 doi

  45. [54]

    K., Thuan, T

    Hunt, L. K., Thuan, T. X., Izotov, Y. I., & Sauvage, M. 2010, ApJ, 712, 164, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/164

    2010 doi

  46. [55]

    G., Gawiser, E., Faber, S

    Iyer, K. G., Gawiser, E., Faber, S. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 879, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2052

    2019 doi

  47. [56]

    2018, ApJ, 864, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad4af

    Jin, S., Daddi, E., Liu, D., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad4af

    2018 doi

  48. [57]

    2017, Bd-J/Prospector: Initial Release, v0.1, Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1116491

    Johnson, B., & Leja, J. 2017, Bd-J/Prospector: Initial Release, v0.1, Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1116491

    2017 doi

  49. [58]

    D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J

    Johnson, B. D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2021, ApJS, 254, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abef67

    2021 doi

  50. [59]

    T., & Stanway, E

    Jones, G. T., & Stanway, E. R. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 5720, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2683

    2023 doi

  51. [60]

    2011, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 63, S379, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.sp2.S379

    Kajisawa, M., Ichikawa, T., Tanaka, I., et al. 2011, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 63, S379, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.sp2.S379

    2011 doi

  52. [61]

    2009, ApJ, 703, 1672, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1672

    Kennicutt, Robert C., J., Hao, C.-N., Calzetti, D., et al. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1672, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1672

    2009 doi

  53. [62]

    C., & Evans, N

    Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. 2012, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 50, 531, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610

    2012 doi

  54. [63]

    C., Calzetti, D., Aniano, G., et al

    Kennicutt, R. C., Calzetti, D., Aniano, G., et al. 2011, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 123, 1347, doi: 10.1086/663818

    2011 doi

  55. [64]

    M., et al

    Kirkpatrick, A., Pope, A., Alexander, D. M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 759, 139, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/139

    2012 doi

  56. [65]

    M., Faber, S

    Koekemoer, A. M., Faber, S. M., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 36, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36

    2011 doi

  57. [66]

    2013, ApJL, 775, L16, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L16

    Kriek, M., & Conroy, C. 2013, ApJL, 775, L16, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L16

    2013 doi

  58. [67]

    G., Labb´ e, I., et al

    Kriek, M., van Dokkum, P. G., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 221, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/221

    2009 doi

  59. [68]

    2016, ApJL, 820, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/820/1/L1 Labb´ e, I., Bouwens, R., Illingworth, G

    Kurczynski, P., Gawiser, E., Acquaviva, V., et al. 2016, ApJL, 820, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/820/1/L1 Labb´ e, I., Bouwens, R., Illingworth, G. D., & Franx, M. 2006, ApJL, 649, L67, doi: 10.1086/508512

    2016 doi

  60. [69]

    W., & Schlegel, D

    Lang, D., Hogg, D. W., & Schlegel, D. J. 2016, AJ, 151, 36, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/36

    2016 doi

  61. [70]

    B., Casey, C

    Lee, N., Sanders, D. B., Casey, C. M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 80, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/80

    2015 doi

  62. [71]

    Speagle, J. S. 2019a, ApJ, 876, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab133c

    doi

  63. [72]

    2017, ApJ, 837, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffe

    Byler, N. 2017, ApJ, 837, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffe

    2017 doi

  64. [73]

    D., Conroy, C., et al

    Leja, J., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., et al. 2019b, ApJ, 877, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1d5a

    doi

  65. [74]

    S., Ting, Y.-S., et al

    Leja, J., Speagle, J. S., Ting, Y.-S., et al. 2022, ApJ, 936, 165, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac887d

    2022 doi

  66. [75]

    2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 339, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1051-1

    Li, A. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 339, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1051-1

    2020 doi

  67. [76]

    2018, ApJ, 853, 172, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa600

    Liu, D., Daddi, E., Dickinson, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 172, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa600

    2018 doi

  68. [77]

    2011, A&A, 532, A90, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117107

    Lutz, D., Poglitsch, A., Altieri, B., et al. 2011, A&A, 532, A90, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117107

    2011 doi

  69. [78]

    2014, ARA&A, 52, 415, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    Madau, P., & Dickinson, M. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 415, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    2014 doi

  70. [79]

    C., Galliano, F., Jones, A

    Madden, S. C., Galliano, F., Jones, A. P., & Sauvage, M. 2006, A&A, 446, 877, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053890

    2006 doi

  71. [80]

    E., Rigopoulou, D., Helou, G., et al

    Magdis, G. E., Rigopoulou, D., Helou, G., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A136, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322226

    2013 doi

  72. [81]

    2013, A&A, 553, A132, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321371

    Magnelli, B., Popesso, P., Berta, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A132, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321371

    2013 doi

  73. [83]

    P., Leja, J., Speagle, J

    Mathews, E. P., Leja, J., Speagle, J. S., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 954, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace720 28McNulty et al. 2024

    2023 doi

  74. [84]

    J., Milvang-Jensen, B., Dunlop, J., et al

    McCracken, H. J., Milvang-Jensen, B., Dunlop, J., et al. 2012, A&A, 544, A156, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219507

    2012 doi

  75. [85]

    C., et al

    Merlin, E., Fontana, A., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2015, A&A, 582, A15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526471

    2015 doi

  76. [86]

    2016, A&A, 595, A97, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628751

    Merlin, E., Bourne, N., Castellano, M., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A97, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628751

    2016 doi

  77. [87]

    G., Brammer, G

    Momcheva, I. G., Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2016, ApJS, 225, 27, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/27

    2016 doi

  78. [88]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.20572, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.20572

    Moullet, A., Kataria, T., Lis, D., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.20572, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.20572

    2023 doi

  79. [89]

    2010, ApJ, 725, 742, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/742

    Muzzin, A., van Dokkum, P., Kriek, M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 742, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/742

    2010 doi

  80. [90]

    J., Tacchella, S., Diemer, B., et al

    Nelson, E. J., Tacchella, S., Diemer, B., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 219, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2131

    2021 doi

  81. [91]

    T., Schulz, B., Levenson, L., et al

    Nguyen, H. T., Schulz, B., Levenson, L., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014680

    2010 doi

  82. [92]

    G., Weiner, B

    Noeske, K. G., Weiner, B. J., Faber, S. M., et al. 2007, ApJL, 660, L43, doi: 10.1086/517926

    2007 doi

  83. [93]

    2009, A&A, 507, 1793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912497

    Noll, S., Burgarella, D., Giovannoli, E., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 1793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912497

    2009 doi

  84. [94]

    2009, ApJS, 183, 244, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/183/2/244

    Nonino, M., Dickinson, M., Rosati, P., et al. 2009, ApJS, 183, 244, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/183/2/244

    2009 doi

  85. [95]

    J., Bock, J., Altieri, B., et al

    Oliver, S. J., Bock, J., Altieri, B., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 1614, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20912.x

    2012

  86. [96]

    G., Mobasher, B., et al

    Pacifici, C., Iyer, K. G., Mobasher, B., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acacff

    2023 doi

  87. [97]

    Papovich, C., Dickinson, M., & Ferguson, H. C. 2001, ApJ, 559, 620, doi: 10.1086/322412

    2001 doi

  88. [98]

    Perez, F., & Granger, B. E. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 21, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53

    2007 doi

  89. [99]

    2008, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Pope, A., Scott, D., Dickinson, M., et al. 2008, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 381, Infrared Diagnostics of Galaxy Evolution, ed. R. R. Chary, H. I. Teplitz, & K. Sheth, 249

    2008

  90. [100]

    2012, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1211.4257, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1211.4257

    Popesso, P., Magnelli, B., Buttiglione, S., et al. 2012, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1211.4257, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1211.4257

    2012 doi arXiv

  91. [101]

    2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490, 5285, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2635

    Popesso, P., Morselli, L., Concas, A., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490, 5285, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2635

    2019 doi

  92. [102]

    2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 744, 154, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/154

    Reddy, N., Dickinson, M., Elbaz, D., et al. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 744, 154, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/154

    2011 doi

  93. [103]

    2015, ApJL, 801, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/801/2/L29

    Renzini, A., & Peng, Y.-j. 2015, ApJL, 801, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/801/2/L29

    2015 doi

  94. [104]

    2010, A&A, 511, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912940

    Retzlaff, J., Rosati, P., Dickinson, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 511, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912940

    2010 doi

  95. [105]

    H., Alberts, S., Shivaei, I., et al

    Rieke, G. H., Alberts, S., Shivaei, I., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6cd2

    2024 doi

  96. [106]

    H., Young, E

    Rieke, G. H., Young, E. T., Engelbracht, C. W., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 25, doi: 10.1086/422717

    2004 doi

  97. [107]

    H., Wright, G

    Rieke, G. H., Wright, G. S., B¨ oker, T., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 584, doi: 10.1086/682252

    2015 doi

  98. [108]

    G., Oliver, S

    Roseboom, I. G., Oliver, S. J., Kunz, M., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 409, 48, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17634.x

    2010

  99. [109]

    H., Weiner, B

    Rujopakarn, W., Rieke, G. H., Weiner, B. J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 73, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/73

    2013 doi

  100. [110]

    M., Charlot, S., et al

    Salim, S., Rich, R. M., Charlot, S., et al. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 173, 267, doi: 10.1086/519218

    2007 doi

  101. [111]

    B., & Mirabel, I

    Sanders, D. B., & Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 749, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.749

    1996 doi

  102. [112]

    B., Salvato, M., Aussel, H., et al

    Sanders, D. B., Salvato, M., Aussel, H., et al. 2007, ApJS, 172, 86, doi: 10.1086/517885

    2007 doi

  103. [113]

    2015, A&A, 575, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425017

    Schreiber, C., Pannella, M., Elbaz, D., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425017

    2015 doi

  104. [114]

    2018, A&A, 618, A85, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833070

    Schreiber, C., Glazebrook, K., Nanayakkara, T., et al. 2018, A&A, 618, A85, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833070

    2018 doi

  105. [115]

    Y., Hirashita, H., & Asano, R

    Seok, J. Y., Hirashita, H., & Asano, R. S. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2186, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu120

    2014 doi

  106. [116]

    E., Steidel, C

    Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., et al. 2001, The Astrophysical Journal, 562, 95, doi: 10.1086/323432

    2001 doi

  107. [117]

    2020, ApJL, 903, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abc1ef

    Shivaei, I., Darvish, B., Sattari, Z., et al. 2020, ApJL, 903, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abc1ef

    2020 doi

  108. [118]

    A., Shapley, A

    Shivaei, I., Reddy, N. A., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa619c

    2017 doi

  109. [119]

    2024, A&A, 690, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449579

    Shivaei, I., Alberts, S., Florian, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449579

    2024 doi

  110. [120]

    E., Whitaker, K

    Skelton, R. E., Whitaker, K. E., Momcheva, I. G., et al. 2014, ApJS, 214, 24, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/24

    2014 doi

  111. [121]

    S., & Dav´ e, R

    Somerville, R. S., & Dav´ e, R. 2015, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 53, 51, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951

    2015 doi

  112. [122]

    S., Steinhardt, C

    Speagle, J. S., Steinhardt, C. L., Capak, P. L., & Silverman, J. D. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 214, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15

    2014 doi

  113. [123]

    C., Adelberger, K

    Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2003, ApJ, 592, 728, doi: 10.1086/375772

    2003 doi

  114. [124]

    2014, ApJ, 789, 164, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/164

    Tal, T., Dekel, A., Oesch, P., et al. 2014, ApJ, 789, 164, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/164

    2014 doi

  115. [125]

    2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 172, 9, doi: 10.1086/516596

    Taniguchi, Y., Scoville, N., Murayama, T., et al. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 172, 9, doi: 10.1086/516596

    2007 doi

  116. [126]

    R., Quadri, R

    Tomczak, A. R., Quadri, R. F., Tran, K.-V. H., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 118, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/118

    2016 doi

  117. [127]

    W., Shapley, A

    Topping, M. W., Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 1237, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1793 Panchromatic SED Fitting of 3D-Herschel29

    2021 doi

  118. [128]

    A., Heckman, T

    Tremonti, C. A., Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., et al. 2004, The Astrophysical Journal, 613, 898, doi: 10.1086/423264

    2004 doi

  119. [129]

    2014, ApJL, 783, L30, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/783/2/L30 Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S

    Utomo, D., Kriek, M., Labb´ e, I., Conroy, C., & Fumagalli, M. 2014, ApJL, 783, L30, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/783/2/L30 Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science and Engineering, 13, 22, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 van Dokkum, P. G., Nelson, E. J...

    2014 doi

  120. [130]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Medicine, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  121. [131]

    2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 944, L58, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acba99

    Wang, B., Leja, J., Bezanson, R., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 944, L58, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acba99

    2023 doi

  122. [132]

    E., Pope, A., Cybulski, R., et al

    Whitaker, K. E., Pope, A., Cybulski, R., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 850, 208, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa94ce

    2017 doi

  123. [133]

    2012, ApJL, 754, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/754/2/L29

    Franx, M. 2012, ApJL, 754, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/754/2/L29

    2012 doi

  124. [134]

    E., Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P

    Whitaker, K. E., Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/86

    2011 doi

  125. [135]

    E., Franx, M., Leja, J., et al

    Whitaker, K. E., Franx, M., Leja, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 104, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/104

    2014 doi

  126. [136]

    E., Narayanan, D., Williams, C

    Whitaker, K. E., Narayanan, D., Williams, C. C., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 922, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac399f

    2021 doi

  127. [137]

    S., Rieke, G

    Wright, G. S., Rieke, G. H., Glasse, A., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 048003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acbe66

    2023 doi

  128. [138]

    M., et al

    Wuyts, S., Labb´ e, I., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 682, 985, doi: 10.1086/588749

    2008 doi

  129. [139]

    Xie, Y., & Ho, L. C. 2019, ApJ, 884, 136, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4200

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.