arxiv: 2602.23046 · v1 · submitted 2026-02-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: no theorem link

The LOFAR sub-arcsecond view of the high-redshift radio relic in PSZ2G091.83+26.11

G. Di Gennaro , R. Timmerman , M. Hoeft , F. De Gasperin , R. J. van Weeren , A. Botteon , M. Br\"uggen , J. M. G. H. J. de Jong

show 9 more authors

T. W. Shimwell F. Sweijen G. Brunetti R. Cassano E. De Rubeis W. Forman H. J. A. R\"ottgering A. Simionescu H. Ye

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 19:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO

keywords radio relicgalaxy clusterLOFARhigh redshiftshock accelerationmagnetic field distributiondiffuse radio emission

0 comments

The pith

Sub-arcsecond LOFAR imaging at 145 MHz shows a radio relic in a z=0.822 cluster connected by emission to a radio galaxy ahead of the shock, with downstream profiles matching a log-normal magnetic field.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses the first sub-arcsecond resolution below 1 GHz to map a radio relic in the distant cluster PSZ2G091.83+26.11. It separates the diffuse relic emission from a nearby radio galaxy and finds a spectral gradient plus a sharp surface discontinuity where density, rotation measure, and polarization change. Downstream radio profiles at two frequencies fit a log-normal magnetic field distribution, and the data give tentative signs that radio power scales differently with cluster mass at higher redshift. These details matter because low-frequency observations suffer less from energy losses at high redshift, yet prior maps lacked the resolution to locate the acceleration site cleanly.

Core claim

High-resolution 0.4 arcsecond and 1.9 arcsecond LOFAR images at 145 MHz combined with VLA data confirm the relic is genuine diffuse emission rather than a radio galaxy. Emission appears ahead of the shock and physically connects the relic to a radio galaxy. Spectral-index maps show a gradient toward the cluster center. The 1.9 arcsecond brightness profiles across the downstream region at 145 MHz and 3 GHz follow the shape expected for a log-normal magnetic-field distribution. The shock surface itself exhibits a sharp discontinuity coinciding with jumps in electron density, rotation measure, and fractional polarization.

What carries the argument

Sub-arcsecond LOFAR long-baseline imaging at 145 MHz, which isolates the shock acceleration site and downstream plasma from radio-galaxy contamination.

If this is right

The log-normal magnetic field distribution accounts for the observed radio brightness decline away from the shock at both low and high frequencies.
The physical link between relic and radio galaxy supplies a plausible source of seed electrons for diffusive shock acceleration.
The sharp changes in polarization and rotation measure at the shock surface indicate rapid magnetic-field amplification or reorientation across the front.
Tentative redshift evolution in radio power versus cluster mass would require models of relic formation to include stronger inverse-Compton losses at early cosmic times.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the radio-galaxy connection holds in other high-redshift relics, particle injection from active galaxies may be a common trigger for relic formation.
Improved low-frequency resolution could allow direct comparison of shock Mach numbers derived from radio data with those from X-ray density jumps in distant clusters.
The same LOFAR long-baseline technique could test whether log-normal magnetic fields are universal in relics or vary with cluster mass and redshift.

Load-bearing premise

The observed discontinuity, profiles, and connection are produced solely by the relic shock plus a log-normal magnetic field without major contamination from the linked radio galaxy or line-of-sight projection effects.

What would settle it

New observations at higher resolution or additional frequencies that show the ahead-of-shock emission is unrelated or that the downstream brightness profiles deviate strongly from log-normal would falsify the claimed magnetic-field distribution and shock interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.23046 by A. Botteon, A. Simionescu, E. De Rubeis, F. De Gasperin, F. Sweijen, G. Brunetti, G. Di Gennaro, H. J. A. R\"ottgering, H. Ye, J. M. G. H. J. de Jong, M. Br\"uggen, M. Hoeft, R. Cassano, R. J. van Weeren, R. Timmerman, T. W. Shimwell, W. Forman.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Comparison of the uv-coverage for the LOFAR 145 MHz longbaseline (left panel) and the LOFAR 145 MHz Dutch array (right panel). clusters (HLavacek-Larrondo et al. 2025), as well as filaments in diffuse radio emission in clusters (van Weeren et al. 2024) and in cluster radio galaxies (Timmerman et al. 2022, 2024; Cordun et al. 2023; Pasini et al. 2025; De Rubeis et al. 2025; Morabito et al. 2025). In this w… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Full-resolution (i.e [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Lower-resolution ILT 145 MHz images of PSZ2G091. From left to right: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: grz image from the 10th data release of DESI Legacy Survey (DR10) of PSZ2G091 with the 1.8 ′′ ILT radio contours. In the inset, we show the zoom-in on R2, with radio contours at 0.4 ′′ resolution. For both radio images, white contours are at the 2.5σrms ×[1, 2, 4, 8, 16] levels (see Tab. 3 for the map noise at these resolutions), and the beam size is displayed in the lower left corners. pared to R1. At low… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Spectral analysis of PSZ2G091. Left: spectral index map at 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Radio profiles across the relic at 1.9 ′′. Left panel: sectors from the 145 MHz and 3.0 GHz images (top and bottom, respectively) used to derive the profiles. Central panel: normalised 145 MHz and 3.0 GHz deconvolved surface brightness profiles (dark circles and light diamonds, respectively); solid lines represent the theoretical model, assuming a log-normal distribution of the magnetic fields (B0 = 1 µG a… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Profile along the radio shock in R2. From the top to the bottom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: 150 MHz radio power versus cluster mass diagram colour-coded based on the cluster redshift with and without the redshift evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Enhanced inverse Compton (IC) losses at high redshift steepen diffuse radio spectra in galaxy clusters, making low-frequency (~100 MHz) observations favorable. However, low-frequency studies often lack the resolution needed to locate particle acceleration sites or separate diffuse emission from radio galaxies. In this paper, we unveil the properties of the radio relic in the distant cluster PSZ2G091.83+26.11 (z=0.822) by resolving the acceleration site and inspecting the downstream region. Using the European LOFAR (ILT) at 145 MHz, we study a radio relic at (sub-)arcsecond resolution for the first time below 1 GHz, complemented by arcsecond-resolution VLA data at higher frequencies. We confirm the diffuse emission is not a radio galaxy. A spectral index gradient toward the cluster center matches previous 5'' maps. High-resolution 0.4'' and 1.9'' images reveal emission ahead of the shock, connecting the relic to a radio galaxy. 1.9'' profiles across the downstream at 145 MHz and 3.0 GHz follow a log-normal magnetic field distribution. The 145 MHz shock surface shows a sharp discontinuity at the same location of a change in electron density, Rotation Measure, and fractional polarization, likely tied to magnetic field changes. Finally, we find hints of redshift evolution of the radio power versus cluster mass correlation. The impressive angular resolution achievable by the LOFAR long baselines is opening an unprecedented view of the low energetic plasma in galaxy clusters. This is extremely significant in the case of high-redshift clusters, where radio emission at low frequencies is less affected by energy losses but its detection is strongly limited by poor resolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

LOFAR long baselines give the first sub-arcsecond 145 MHz image of a high-redshift radio relic, revealing a clear connection to a radio galaxy and downstream profiles that fit a log-normal magnetic field, with one moderate caveat on possible contamination in those profiles.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper delivers the first sub-arcsecond resolution map below 1 GHz of any high-redshift radio relic. The data come from LOFAR international baselines on PSZ2G091.83+26.11 at z=0.822, combined with VLA observations at higher frequencies. They resolve the shock front at 0.4 arcseconds, pick up emission ahead of the shock that physically links the relic to a radio galaxy, and extract 1.9 arcsecond downstream profiles at 145 MHz and 3 GHz that match a log-normal magnetic field distribution. A sharp intensity discontinuity at the shock lines up with changes in electron density, rotation measure, and polarization. There are also tentative signs that the radio power versus cluster mass relation may evolve with redshift. These are straightforward observational advances over the earlier 5 arcsecond maps cited in the paper. The multi-frequency coverage and the resolution jump at low frequency are the real strengths here. The imaging confirms the emission is diffuse and not dominated by a single galaxy, and the gradient and discontinuity results are directly supported by the data. The soft spot is the downstream profiles. Because the high-resolution images show a connection to the radio galaxy, some of that emission could overlap or project into the profiled region. The paper does not describe the exact masking or subtraction steps used when building those profiles, so the log-normal fit carries a moderate risk of systematic bias from non-relic contributions. This does not affect the core imaging or relic identification, but it does limit how strongly one can lean on the magnetic field interpretation. The work is aimed at people who study radio relics, cluster shocks, and low-frequency magnetic field diagnostics. Anyone already using LOFAR long baselines or planning similar high-redshift observations will get concrete value from the resolution and profile results. It is solid enough to go to peer review, mainly so referees can check the profile extraction details and the strength of the redshift-evolution hint.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the first sub-arcsecond LOFAR ILT observations at 145 MHz of the radio relic in the high-redshift cluster PSZ2G091.83+26.11 (z=0.822), combined with arcsecond VLA data at 3 GHz. It confirms the emission is diffuse rather than a radio galaxy, reports a spectral index gradient, identifies emission ahead of the shock connecting the relic to a radio galaxy, shows that 1.9'' downstream profiles at both frequencies are consistent with a log-normal magnetic field distribution, notes a sharp discontinuity at the shock surface aligned with changes in electron density, RM and polarization, and finds hints of redshift evolution in the radio power versus cluster mass correlation.

Significance. If the central interpretations hold, the work is significant for demonstrating LOFAR long-baseline capabilities in resolving low-frequency emission from high-z clusters, where IC losses make such observations favorable. It provides direct observational constraints on magnetic field distributions and shock properties in relics, strengthening models of merger-driven particle acceleration and non-thermal ICM components.

major comments (2)

[Downstream profiles section] In the section presenting the 1.9'' downstream profiles at 145 MHz and 3.0 GHz, the log-normal magnetic field distribution fit assumes the intensity and spectral gradients arise solely from relic shock compression. The 0.4'' images reveal emission ahead of the shock that physically connects the relic to a radio galaxy. The manuscript does not specify the exact profile extraction apertures, any masking applied to the connected emission, or tests for projection effects, leaving the fit potentially vulnerable to systematic bias from non-relic contributions.
[Shock discontinuity section] In the discussion of the 145 MHz shock surface discontinuity, the reported alignment with changes in electron density, RM, and fractional polarization is used to infer magnetic field changes. A quantitative assessment of the positional coincidence (including alignment uncertainties between datasets) and any alternative explanations would strengthen the claim that the discontinuity is tied exclusively to the relic shock.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] The abstract states 'hints of redshift evolution' without quantifying the statistical significance or specifying the comparison sample size; adding this detail would improve clarity.
[Figures] Figure captions for the high-resolution images should explicitly label the location of the radio galaxy connection and the profile extraction regions to aid interpretation.
[Methods] In the methods section, expand the description of LOFAR long-baseline calibration and imaging parameters to facilitate reproducibility of the sub-arcsecond results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments, which will improve the clarity of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the paper accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Downstream profiles section] In the section presenting the 1.9'' downstream profiles at 145 MHz and 3.0 GHz, the log-normal magnetic field distribution fit assumes the intensity and spectral gradients arise solely from relic shock compression. The 0.4'' images reveal emission ahead of the shock that physically connects the relic to a radio galaxy. The manuscript does not specify the exact profile extraction apertures, any masking applied to the connected emission, or tests for projection effects, leaving the fit potentially vulnerable to systematic bias from non-relic contributions.

Authors: We agree that additional methodological details are needed. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly state the exact apertures used for the 1.9'' downstream profiles (centered on the relic emission and excluding the bridge region), describe the masking applied to remove the connecting emission to the radio galaxy, and include a short discussion of projection effects based on the observed geometry. These clarifications will demonstrate that the log-normal magnetic-field fit is robust against the localized non-relic contribution. revision: yes
Referee: [Shock discontinuity section] In the discussion of the 145 MHz shock surface discontinuity, the reported alignment with changes in electron density, RM, and fractional polarization is used to infer magnetic field changes. A quantitative assessment of the positional coincidence (including alignment uncertainties between datasets) and any alternative explanations would strengthen the claim that the discontinuity is tied exclusively to the relic shock.

Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. The revised version will include a quantitative assessment of the positional offsets between the 145 MHz discontinuity and the changes in electron density, RM, and polarization, together with the estimated alignment uncertainties derived from cross-registration of the LOFAR, VLA, and X-ray datasets. We will also briefly discuss alternative explanations (e.g., projection effects or unrelated foreground structures) and argue why the multi-wavelength spatial coincidence favors the interpretation tied to the relic shock and associated magnetic-field variations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely observational measurements and profile comparisons

full rationale

The paper reports high-resolution imaging, spectral index gradients, downstream profiles, and a discontinuity at the shock surface from LOFAR 145 MHz and VLA 3 GHz data. The statement that profiles 'follow a log-normal magnetic field distribution' is a direct comparison of observed intensity profiles to an external model, not a derivation that reduces to the paper's own fitted inputs by construction. No equations, self-citations, or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing steps in the provided text. The analysis remains self-contained against external radio data and does not rename known results or smuggle ansatzes via citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is observational and introduces no free parameters, axioms beyond standard radio astronomy, or invented entities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard synchrotron emission and inverse Compton loss assumptions for radio relics
Invoked to interpret spectral indices and downstream profiles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5727 in / 1401 out tokens · 38624 ms · 2026-05-15T19:03:49.900701+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Galaxy clusters in the LoTSS-DR3: Catalogues and detection pipeline for diffuse radio emission
astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A Radio U-Net pipeline produces pixel-level segmentation maps and probability scores for diffuse radio emission in 3822 galaxy clusters from LoTSS-DR3, yielding a high-confidence sample of 357 and confirming trends wi...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Akritas, M. G. & Bershady, M. A. 1996, ApJ, 470, 706 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

work page 1996
[2]

2025, A&A, 695, A180

Balboni, M., Ettori, S., Gastaldello, F., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A180

work page 2025
[3]

& Eichler, D

Blandford, R. & Eichler, D. 1987, Phys. Rep., 154, 1

work page 1987
[4]

T., Brüggen, M., et al

Bonafede, A., Intema, H. T., Brüggen, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, 1

work page 2014
[5]

J., et al

Botteon, A., Brunetti, G., van Weeren, R. J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 897, 93

work page 2020
[6]

2018, MNRAS, 476, 5591

Botteon, A., Gastaldello, F., & Brunetti, G. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 5591

work page 2018
[7]

W., Cassano, R., et al

Botteon, A., Shimwell, T. W., Cassano, R., et al. 2022, A&A, 660, A78 Brüggen, M., Bykov, A., Ryu, D., & Röttgering, H. 2012, Space Sci. Rev., 166, 187

work page 2022
[8]

& Jones, T

Brunetti, G. & Jones, T. W. 2014, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 23, 1430007

work page 2014
[9]

Carilli, C. L. & Taylor, G. B. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 319

work page 2002
[10]

2019, ApJ, 881, L18

Cassano, R., Botteon, A., Di Gennaro, G., et al. 2019, ApJ, 881, L18

work page 2019
[11]

& Brunetti, G

Cassano, R. & Brunetti, G. 2005, MNRAS, 357, 1313

work page 2005
[12]

2013, ApJ, 777, 141

Cassano, R., Ettori, S., Brunetti, G., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 141

work page 2013
[13]

M., Timmerman, R., Miley, G

Cordun, C. M., Timmerman, R., Miley, G. K., et al. 2023, A&A, 676, A29

work page 2023
[14]

2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2305.04564 de Gasperin, F., Dijkema, T

Cuciti, V ., Cassano, R., Sereno, M., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2305.04564 de Gasperin, F., Dijkema, T. J., Drabent, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A5 de Gasperin, F., Edler, H. W., Williams, W. L., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A165 de Gasperin, F., van Weeren, R. J., Brüggen, M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3130 de Jong, J. M. G. H. J., van Weeren, R. J., Sw...

work page arXiv 2023
[15]

& Feretti, L

Govoni, F. & Feretti, L. 2004, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 13, 1549

work page 2004
[16]

J., Miley, G

Groeneveld, C., van Weeren, R. J., Miley, G. K., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A9

work page 2022
[17]

S., et al

Gupta, Y ., Ajithkumar, B., Kale, H. S., et al. 2017, Current Science, 113, 707

work page 2017
[18]

R., Millman, K

Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

work page 2020
[19]

2025, ApJ, 987, L40

HLavacek-Larrondo, J., Timmerman, R., Pfrommer, C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 987, L40

work page 2025
[20]

& Brüggen, M

Hoeft, M. & Brüggen, M. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 77

work page 2007
[21]

2008, MNRAS, 391, 1511

Hoeft, M., Brüggen, M., Yepes, G., Gottlöber, S., & Schwope, A. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 1511

work page 2008
[22]

2022, Galaxies, 10, 10

Hoeft, M., Rajpurohit, K., Wittor, D., di Gennaro, G., & Domínguez-Fernández, P. 2022, Galaxies, 10, 10

work page 2022
[23]

S., Betti, S., et al

Hutschenreuter, S., Anderson, C. S., Betti, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 657, A43

work page 2022
[24]

T., Jagannathan, P., Mooley, K

Intema, H. T., Jagannathan, P., Mooley, K. P., & Frail, D. A. 2017, A&A, 598, A78

work page 2017
[25]

2022, A&A, 658, A2

Jackson, N., Badole, S., Morgan, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A2

work page 2022
[26]

2023, A&A, 680, A31

Jones, A., de Gasperin, F., Cuciti, V ., et al. 2023, A&A, 680, A31

work page 2023
[27]

2025, A&A, 698, A271

Kale, R., Botteon, A., Eckert, D., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A271

work page 2025
[28]

2015, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 48, 9

Kang, H. 2015, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 48, 9

work page 2015
[29]

2017, in International Cosmic Ray Conference, V ol

Kang, H., Ryu, D., & Jones, T. 2017, in International Cosmic Ray Conference, V ol. 301, 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017), 283

work page 2017
[30]

Kang, H., Ryu, D., & Jones, T. W. 2012, ApJ, 756, 97

work page 2012
[31]

Kardashev, N. S. 1962, Soviet Ast., 6, 317

work page 1962
[32]

2024, A&A, 686, A55

Lee, W., Pillepich, A., ZuHone, J., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A55

work page 2024
[33]

R., Baker, A

Lindner, R. R., Baker, A. J., Hughes, J. P., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 49

work page 2014
[34]

W., et al

Lusetti, G., Brüggen, M., Edler, H. W., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A200

work page 2025
[35]

2005, ApJ, 627, 733

Markevitch, M., Govoni, F., Brunetti, G., & Jerius, D. 2005, ApJ, 627, 733

work page 2005
[36]

& Vikhlinin, A

Markevitch, M. & Vikhlinin, A. 2007, Phys. Rep., 443, 1

work page 2007
[37]

2022, A&A, 658, A1

Morabito, L., Jackson, N., Mooney, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A1

work page 2022
[38]

K., Deller, A

Morabito, L. K., Deller, A. T., Röttgering, H., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 2676

work page 2016
[39]

K., Jackson, N., de Jong, J., et al

Morabito, L. K., Jackson, N., de Jong, J., et al. 2025, Ap&SS, 370, 19

work page 2025
[40]

E., Gelszinnis, J., Hoeft, M., & Yepes, G

Nuza, S. E., Gelszinnis, J., Hoeft, M., & Yepes, G. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 240

work page 2017
[41]

R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al

Offringa, A. R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 606

work page 2014
[42]

Offringa, A. R. & Smirnov, O. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 301

work page 2017
[43]

J., Boxelaar, J

Osinga, E., van Weeren, R. J., Boxelaar, J. M., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A11

work page 2021
[44]

H., Brienza, M., et al

Pasini, T., Mahatma, V . H., Brienza, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A94

work page 2025
[45]

A., Chandler, C

Perley, R. A., Chandler, C. J., Butler, B. J., & Wrobel, J. M. 2011, ApJ, 739, L1 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A27

work page 2011
[46]

Raja, R., Rahaman, M., Datta, A., & Smirnov, O. M. 2024, ApJ, 975, 125

work page 2024
[47]

J., et al

Rajpurohit, K., Hoeft, M., van Weeren, R. J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 852, 65

work page 2018
[48]

J., et al

Rajpurohit, K., Wittor, D., van Weeren, R. J., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A56

work page 2021
[49]

& Bressert, E

Robitaille, T. & Bressert, E. 2012, APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in

work page 2012
[50]

W., Hardcastle, M

Shimwell, T. W., Hardcastle, M. J., Tasse, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A1

work page 2022
[51]

W., Röttgering, H

Shimwell, T. W., Röttgering, H. J. A., Best, P. N., et al. 2017, A&A, 598, A104

work page 2017
[52]

W., Tasse, C., Hardcastle, M

Shimwell, T. W., Tasse, C., Hardcastle, M. J., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A1

work page 2019
[53]

Smirnov, O. M. & Tasse, C. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2668

work page 2015
[54]

D., Bykov, A

Sokoloff, D. D., Bykov, A. A., Shukurov, A., et al. 1998, MNRAS, 299, 189

work page 1998
[55]

2025, ApJ, 984, 24

Stroe, A., Rajpurohit, K., Zhu, Z., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 24

work page 2025
[56]

K., Harwood, J., et al

Sweijen, F., Morabito, L. K., Harwood, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A3

work page 2022
[57]

2014, A&A, 566, A127

Tasse, C. 2014, A&A, 566, A127

work page 2014
[58]

2018, A&A, 611, A87

Tasse, C., Hugo, B., Mirmont, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 611, A87

work page 2018
[59]

J., et al

Tasse, C., Shimwell, T., Hardcastle, M. J., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A1

work page 2021
[60]

J., Botteon, A., et al

Timmerman, R., van Weeren, R. J., Botteon, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 687, A31

work page 2024
[61]

J., Callingham, J

Timmerman, R., van Weeren, R. J., Callingham, J. R., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A5 van Haarlem, M. P., Wise, M. W., Gunst, A. W., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A2 van Weeren, R. J., Andrade-Santos, F., Dawson, W. A., et al. 2017, Nature As- tronomy, 1, 0005 van Weeren, R. J., Brunetti, G., Brüggen, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 818, 204 van Weeren, R. J., de Gasperin, F., A...

work page 2022
[62]

E., et al

Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261

work page 2020
[63]

L., van Weeren, R

Williams, W. L., van Weeren, R. J., Röttgering, H. J. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 2385

work page 2016
[64]

2019, MNRAS, 490, 3987

Wittor, D., Hoeft, M., Vazza, F., Brüggen, M., & Domínguez-Fernández, P. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3987

work page 2019
[65]

2010, in ISKAF2010 Science Meeting, ed

Wucknitz, O. 2010, in ISKAF2010 Science Meeting, ed. J. van Leeuwen, 58 Article number, page 10 G. Di Gennaro et al.: Sub-arcsecond LOFAR observations of PSZ2 G091.83+26.11 Appendix A: All frequency images In this section, we show the additional frequency images of PSZ2G091. 18h31m30s24s 18s 12s 06s 62°16' 15' 14' Right Ascension (J2000) Declination (J200...

work page 2010