pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.23625 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-27 · 🪐 quant-ph · hep-th

From quantum time to manifestly covariant QFT: On the need for a quantum-action-based quantization

N. L. Diaz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 19:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph hep-th
keywords quantum timemanifest covariancequantum actionspacetime quantum mechanicsQFT quantizationno-go theoremstates over time
0
0 comments X

The pith

A quantum-action-based quantization produces spacetime quantum mechanics that makes Lorentz covariance manifest for interacting QFTs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether quantum time ideas, in which time becomes a dynamical degree of freedom, can be lifted from single particles to full quantum field theory so that Lorentz covariance appears explicitly at the Hilbert-space level. A naive second-quantized construction treating the quantum-time particle as elementary leads to inconsistencies, which the authors trace to a no-go theorem: Dirac quantization of the associated spacetime classical mechanics simply recovers ordinary QFT and therefore conceals covariance again. They circumvent the obstruction by introducing a quantum-action-based quantization that defines a spacetime version of quantum mechanics, resting on a genuine generalization of the quantum state to spacetime that enforces causality. A sympathetic reader would care because standard canonical QFT keeps covariance implicit and imposed after quantization, while an explicitly covariant Hilbert-space formulation could streamline the treatment of interactions and spacetime symmetries.

Core claim

By elevating the quantum-time particle to the elementary object in a second-quantized formalism, introducing spacetime field algebras, and replacing ordinary Dirac quantization with a quantum-action-based procedure, one obtains a spacetime quantum mechanics in which Lorentz covariance is manifest at the Hilbert-space level for interacting theories; this construction is tied to a spacetime generalization of quantum states that is required by causality and linked to states-over-time proposals.

What carries the argument

The quantum action, which defines the second-quantized dynamics on spacetime field algebras and enables a quantization that evades the no-go collapse while incorporating a spacetime generalization of quantum states.

If this is right

  • Interacting QFTs acquire manifest Lorentz covariance directly at the Hilbert-space level rather than through imposed symmetries.
  • A spacetime version of quantum mechanics exists that is consistent and causal without the inconsistencies of naive many-body constructions.
  • The spacetime generalization of quantum states satisfies causality and connects to states-over-time frameworks.
  • Timelike entanglement and emergent-time notions in dS/CFT settings receive a microscopic realization through the same generalized states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same quantum-action structure could be tested in simplified models of relativistic quantum information to check whether covariant state evolution yields new entanglement measures.
  • Extending the approach to include gravitational degrees of freedom might produce a manifestly covariant starting point for quantum gravity without first choosing a time foliation.
  • The no-go theorem suggests that any attempt to promote time classically before quantization will fail, so future covariant quantizations must begin from the quantum action itself.

Load-bearing premise

A consistent quantum-action-based quantization can be defined that avoids collapsing to standard QFT while satisfying causality through the spacetime generalization of quantum states.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation for a simple interacting model in which the proposed spacetime quantum mechanics either reproduces ordinary QFT results exactly or violates relativistic causality in a measurable way.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.23625 by N. L. Diaz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Scheme on the relation between the QT scheme of a particle, the standard notion of particle in QFT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Different causality induced behavior of partial traces of a spacetime state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In quantum time (QT) schemes, time is promoted to a degree of freedom, allowing Lorentz covariance to be made explicit for single particles. We ask whether this can be lifted to QFT, so that Lorentz covariance becomes manifest at the Hilbert-space level, rather than being hidden as in the standard canonical formulation. We address this question by proposing a second-quantized approach in which the elementary particle is the QT particle itself, leading naturally to the notion of spacetime field algebras and of quantum action. We show, however, that a naive many-body construction runs into inconsistencies. To pinpoint their origin we introduce a classical counterpart of the second-quantized formalism, spacetime classical mechanics (SCM), and prove a no-go theorem: Dirac quantization of SCM collapses back to standard QFT and therefore hides covariance. We circumvent this problem by presenting a quantum-action-based quantization that yields a spacetime version of quantum mechanics (SQM), making covariance manifest for (interacting) QFTs. Finally, we show that this resolution is tied to a genuine spacetime generalization of the notion of quantum state, required by causality and closely connected to recent ``states over time'' proposals and, in dS/CFT-motivated settings, to microscopic notions of timelike entanglement and emergent time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper extends quantum time (QT) schemes from single-particle quantum mechanics to quantum field theory by promoting the QT particle as the elementary object in a second-quantized framework. This leads to spacetime field algebras and a notion of quantum action. After identifying inconsistencies in a naive many-body construction, the authors introduce spacetime classical mechanics (SCM) and prove a no-go theorem showing that its Dirac quantization collapses to standard QFT, thereby hiding manifest covariance. They circumvent the no-go result via a quantum-action-based quantization that produces a spacetime version of quantum mechanics (SQM), making Lorentz covariance explicit at the Hilbert-space level for interacting QFTs. The resolution is tied to a spacetime generalization of the quantum state, required by causality and connected to states-over-time proposals and timelike entanglement in dS/CFT settings.

Significance. If the explicit construction of the quantum-action operator algebra, the SQM Hilbert space, and the no-go theorem hold, the work would offer a route to manifestly covariant QFT formulations that avoid the covariance-hiding features of canonical quantization. It would also strengthen links between quantum time, states over time, and emergent-time ideas in quantum gravity. The significance is currently limited by the absence of detailed derivations showing how SQM reproduces standard interacting QFT dynamics while enforcing causality through the new state generalization.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (No-go theorem): The claim that Dirac quantization of SCM necessarily collapses to standard QFT (thereby hiding covariance) is load-bearing for motivating the new quantization; the proof sketch must specify the precise form of the SCM constraints, the Dirac bracket algebra, and the resulting Hilbert-space identification with conventional Fock space. Without these explicit steps, it remains unclear whether the collapse is generic or an artifact of the chosen SCM Lagrangian.
  2. [§4] §4 (Quantum-action-based quantization): The central circumvention rests on defining the quantum action operator algebra and the second-quantized SQM Hilbert space such that covariance is manifest and the no-go is avoided. The manuscript must supply the explicit map from the quantum action to the spacetime field operators and demonstrate that the resulting dynamics reproduce known interacting QFT amplitudes while satisfying the spacetime causality condition on the generalized states.
  3. [§5] §5 (Spacetime generalization of quantum states): The assertion that causality requires a genuine spacetime generalization of the quantum state (linked to states-over-time) is used to justify SQM. This step needs a concrete definition of the spacetime state, an explicit proof that it enforces microcausality without reducing to standard QFT, and a check that the construction remains consistent for interacting theories.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the quantum action and spacetime field algebras should be introduced with a clear table or diagram contrasting it to the standard canonical operators.
  2. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction use the phrase 'manifestly covariant' without a precise definition of what 'manifest' means at the Hilbert-space level versus the level of the action; a short clarifying paragraph would help.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive suggestions. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested explicit derivations, maps, and proofs, thereby strengthening the rigor of the no-go theorem, the quantum-action quantization, and the spacetime state construction.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (No-go theorem): The claim that Dirac quantization of SCM necessarily collapses to standard QFT (thereby hiding covariance) is load-bearing for motivating the new quantization; the proof sketch must specify the precise form of the SCM constraints, the Dirac bracket algebra, and the resulting Hilbert-space identification with conventional Fock space. Without these explicit steps, it remains unclear whether the collapse is generic or an artifact of the chosen SCM Lagrangian.

    Authors: We agree that the current sketch of the no-go theorem requires expansion for full rigor. In the revised manuscript we will present the explicit SCM Lagrangian, derive the complete set of first- and second-class constraints, compute the Dirac brackets in detail, and show the step-by-step identification of the resulting Hilbert space with conventional Fock space. This will establish that the collapse is a generic consequence of the SCM structure for the class of Lagrangians considered, rather than an artifact of a particular choice. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Quantum-action-based quantization): The central circumvention rests on defining the quantum action operator algebra and the second-quantized SQM Hilbert space such that covariance is manifest and the no-go is avoided. The manuscript must supply the explicit map from the quantum action to the spacetime field operators and demonstrate that the resulting dynamics reproduce known interacting QFT amplitudes while satisfying the spacetime causality condition on the generalized states.

    Authors: We will add the explicit map from the quantum-action operator algebra to the spacetime field operators. We will also derive the SQM dynamics explicitly, showing that they reproduce the standard interacting QFT amplitudes (via equivalence of the perturbative expansion or Feynman rules) while the generalized states satisfy the required spacetime causality condition. These additions will be placed in a dedicated subsection of §4. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§5] §5 (Spacetime generalization of quantum states): The assertion that causality requires a genuine spacetime generalization of the quantum state (linked to states-over-time) is used to justify SQM. This step needs a concrete definition of the spacetime state, an explicit proof that it enforces microcausality without reducing to standard QFT, and a check that the construction remains consistent for interacting theories.

    Authors: We will supply a concrete functional definition of the spacetime state. We will prove that the associated operator algebra enforces microcausality (commutators vanish at spacelike separations) while the manifest Lorentz covariance of the Hilbert space prevents reduction to the standard canonical formulation. Consistency for interacting theories will be verified explicitly for a scalar field with quartic self-interaction, confirming that the amplitudes match known QFT results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is constructive and self-contained

full rationale

The paper defines SCM, proves an internal no-go theorem for its Dirac quantization (which collapses to standard QFT), then constructs a distinct quantum-action-based quantization yielding SQM with manifest covariance. This is presented as a new proposal whose definitions and algebra are introduced explicitly to avoid the no-go, rather than reducing by construction to prior inputs or fitted parameters. The spacetime state generalization is derived as a required consequence for causality and linked to external 'states over time' literature, without self-citation load-bearing or ansatz smuggling. No step equates a claimed prediction or result to its own definition or fit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 4 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum mechanics and relativity plus several newly introduced concepts whose independent grounding is not shown in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard principles of quantum mechanics and Lorentz covariance hold for single-particle quantum time schemes
    The paper builds directly on existing quantum time constructions to reach QFT.
  • domain assumption A consistent second-quantized formalism for quantum time particles exists and leads to spacetime field algebras
    Invoked to motivate the many-body construction before the no-go theorem is applied.
invented entities (4)
  • Quantum action no independent evidence
    purpose: To define a quantization procedure that keeps Lorentz covariance manifest
    New concept introduced to circumvent the no-go theorem for standard quantization.
  • Spacetime classical mechanics (SCM) no independent evidence
    purpose: Classical counterpart used to diagnose inconsistencies in the naive many-body construction
    Invented to prove the no-go theorem that standard quantization hides covariance.
  • Spacetime version of quantum mechanics (SQM) no independent evidence
    purpose: Resulting framework in which covariance is manifest for interacting QFTs
    Outcome of the quantum-action-based quantization.
  • Spacetime generalization of the quantum state no independent evidence
    purpose: To satisfy causality in the new manifestly covariant setting
    Required by the approach and linked to states-over-time proposals.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5521 in / 1604 out tokens · 39257 ms · 2026-05-15T19:17:12.116494+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    reduced density matrix formalism

    showing that more than a problem of SQM it is a feature, opening interesting avenues that follow from endowing the choice of observer with a quantum aspect. We also notice that both the spacetime symmetric field algebra discussed in this manuscript, and the foliation-related algebra of [13] are particularly suited to deal with covariance under general dif...

    work page

  2. [2]

    time window

    Classical case Let us begin by discussing the discrete spacetime version of the spacetime PBs (27) in3 + 1dimensions. We have{ϕt,x,y,z , πt′,x′,y′,z′}=δ tt′δxx′δyy ′δzz ′ with the Dirac deltas replaced by (dimensionless) Kronecker deltas. To further ease the notation, let us replace the fields by a single scalar particle, so thatϕt,x,y,z →q t, πt,x,y,z →p...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Notice that this algebra fixes the Hilbert-space representation uniquely up to unitary equivalence by the Stone-von Neumann theorem

    Quantum case For the quantum case we impose [qt, pt′] =iℏδ tt′ (A5) 24 and quantize the action (A2) accordingly. Notice that this algebra fixes the Hilbert-space representation uniquely up to unitary equivalence by the Stone-von Neumann theorem. Interestingly, the fact that the action is quantized is yet another consequence of employing extended PBs so th...

    work page

  4. [4]

    translating a single time step

    Continuum time limit in Hilbert space, the parameterτand regularizations In the main text we employed a continuum time formulation from the start. Here we discuss how this corresponds to considering the continuum time limit at the Hilbert space level and how it leads to the introduction of a time scaleτ(similar considerations hold for the classical case)....

    work page

  5. [5]

    Comparison and differences with algebraic QFT and related perspectives Although the present work is formulated in a canonical Hilbert space language, it is natural to ask whether the current results are related to the standard algebraic QFT (AQFT) perspective [47], even more so considering that the latter aims to provide a covariant setting that avoids th...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Physical Review D , author =

    Page, D.N.; Wootters, W.K. Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables. Phys. Rev. D1983,27, 2885.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.27.2885

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.27.2885

  7. [7]

    Generalized hamiltonian dynamics.Can

    Dirac, P.A.M. Generalized hamiltonian dynamics.Can. J. Math.1950,2, 129–148

    work page 1950

  8. [8]

    Quantum theory of gravity

    DeWitt, B.S. Quantum theory of gravity. I. The canonical theory.Phys. Rev.1967,160, 1113

    work page 1967

  9. [9]

    Physical Review D , author =

    Unruh, W.G.; Wald, R.M. Time and the interpretation of canonical quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. D1989, 40, 2598.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.40.2598

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.40.2598

  10. [10]

    Time and interpretations of quantum gravity.Int

    Kuchař, K.V. Time and interpretations of quantum gravity.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D2011,20, 3–86

    work page

  11. [11]

    Anderson

    Anderson, E. Problem of time in quantum gravity.Ann. Der Phys.2012,524, 757–786.https://doi.org/ 10.1002/andp.201200147

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.201200147 2012

  12. [12]

    Quantum time.Phys

    Giovannetti, V.; Lloyd, S.; Maccone, L. Quantum time.Phys. Rev. D2015,92, 045033.https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.045033

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.045033

  13. [13]

    System-time entanglement in a discrete-time model.Phys

    Boette, A.; Rossignoli, R.; Gigena, N.; Cerezo, M. System-time entanglement in a discrete-time model.Phys. Rev. A2016,93, 062127.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.062127

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.93.062127

  14. [14]

    History states of systems and operators.Phys

    Boette, A.; Rossignoli, R. History states of systems and operators.Phys. Rev. A2018,98, 032108.https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.032108. 32

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.032108

  15. [15]

    History state formalism for Dirac’s theory.Phys

    Diaz, N.L.; Rossignoli, R. History state formalism for Dirac’s theory.Phys. Rev. D2019,99, 045008.https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.045008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.045008

  16. [16]

    History state formalism for scalar particles.Phys

    Diaz, N.L.; Matera, J.M.; Rossignoli, R. History state formalism for scalar particles.Phys. Rev. D2019, 100, 125020.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.125020

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.125020

  17. [17]

    Geometric Event-Based Quantum Mechanics.New J

    Giovannetti, V.; Lloyd, S.; Maccone, L. Geometric Event-Based Quantum Mechanics.New J. Phys.2023, 25, 023027.https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/acb793

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/acb793 2023

  18. [18]

    Spacetime quantum and classical mechanics with dynamical foliation

    Diaz, N.L.; Matera, J.M.; Rossignoli, R. Spacetime quantum and classical mechanics with dynamical foliation. Phys. Rev. D2024,109, 105008.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.105008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.105008

  19. [19]

    Quantum observables and recollapsing dynamics.Class

    Marolf, D. Quantum observables and recollapsing dynamics.Class. Quantum Gravity1995,12, 1199.https: //doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/12/5/011

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/12/5/011

  20. [20]

    Equivalence of approaches to relational quantum dynamics in relativistic settings.Front

    Höhn, P.A.; Smith, A.R.; Lock, M.P. Equivalence of approaches to relational quantum dynamics in relativistic settings.Front. Phys.2021,9, 587083

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Spacetime quantum actions.Phys

    Diaz, N.L.; Matera, J.M.; Rossignoli, R. Spacetime quantum actions.Phys. Rev. D2021,103, 065011. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.065011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.065011

  22. [22]

    The radiation theories of Tomonaga, Schwinger, and Feynman.Phys

    Dyson, F.J. The radiation theories of Tomonaga, Schwinger, and Feynman.Phys. Rev.1949,75, 486.https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.75.486

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.75.486 1949

  23. [23]

    Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics.Rev

    Feynman, R.P. Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics.Rev. Mod. Phys.1948,20, 367

    work page 1948

  24. [24]

    Space-time approach to quantum electrodynamics.Phys

    Feynman, R. Space-time approach to quantum electrodynamics.Phys. Rev.1949,76, 769.https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRev.76.769

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.76.769 1949

  25. [25]

    Spacetime quantum mechanics for bosonic and fermionic systems.Phys

    Diaz, N.L.; Rossignoli, R. Spacetime quantum mechanics for bosonic and fermionic systems.Phys. Rev. Res. 2026,8, 013132.https://doi.org/10.1103/zmky-mmwb

    work page doi:10.1103/zmky-mmwb 2026

  26. [26]

    Path integrals from spacetime quantum actions.Ann

    Diaz, N.L.; Matera, J.M.; Rossignoli, R. Path integrals from spacetime quantum actions.Ann. Phys.2025, 479, 170052

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Kiefer, C.Quantum Gravity, 3rd ed.; International Series of Monographs on Physics; OUP Oxford: Oxford, UK, 2012. 33

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    Can a quantum state over time resemble a quantum state at a single time?Proc

    Horsman, D.; Heunen, C.; Pusey, M.F.; Barrett, J.; Spekkens, R.W. Can a quantum state over time resemble a quantum state at a single time?Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.2017,473, 20170395

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Quantum correlations which imply causation.Sci

    Fitzsimons, J.F.; Jones, J.A.; Vedral, V. Quantum correlations which imply causation.Sci. Rep.2015, 5, 18281.https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18281

    work page doi:10.1038/srep18281 2015

  30. [30]

    Superdensity operators for spacetime quantum mechanics.J

    Cotler, J.; Jian, C.M.; Qi, X.L.; Wilczek, F. Superdensity operators for spacetime quantum mechanics.J. High Energy Phys.2018,2018, 93

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Fullwood and A

    Fullwood, J.; Parzygnat, A.J. Operator representation of spatiotemporal quantum correlations.arXiv2024, arXiv:2405.17555

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Milekhin, Z

    Milekhin, A.; Adamska, Z.; Preskill, J. Observable and computable entanglement in time.arXiv2025, arXiv:2502.12240

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Spacetime Density Matrix: Formalism and Properties.J

    Guo, W.Z. Spacetime Density Matrix: Formalism and Properties.J. High Energ. Phys.2026,2026, 128. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2026)128

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2026)128 2026

  34. [34]

    Eisert, M

    Eisert, J.; Cramer, M.; Plenio, M.B. Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy.Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010,82, 277.https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.277

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277 2010

  35. [35]

    Schwabl, F.Advanced Quantum Mechanics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    Representations of spacetime diffeomorphisms

    Isham, C.J.; Kuchar, K.V. Representations of spacetime diffeomorphisms. I. Canonical parametrized field theories.Ann. Phys.1985,164, 288–315.https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(85)90018-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(85)90018-1 1985

  37. [37]

    Matter relative to quantum hypersurfaces.arXiv2023, arXiv:2308.12912

    Hoehn, P.A.; Russo, A.; Smith, A.R. Matter relative to quantum hypersurfaces.arXiv2023, arXiv:2308.12912

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Power of one bit of quantum information.Phys

    Knill, E.; Laflamme, R. Power of one bit of quantum information.Phys. Rev. Lett.1998,81, 5672.https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5672

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5672 1998

  39. [39]

    Peskin, M.E.An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Lehmann, K

    Lehmann, H.; Symanzik, K.; Zimmermann, W. Zur formulierung quantisierter feldtheorien.Il Nuovo C. 1955–19651955,1, 205–225.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02731765

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02731765 1955

  41. [41]

    Harper, T

    Harper, J.; Kawamoto, T.; Maeda, R.; Nakamura, N.; Takayanagi, T. Non-hermitian Density Matrices from Time-like Entanglement and Wormholes.arXiv2025, arXiv:2512.13800

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Timelike entanglement entropy.J

    Doi, K.; Harper, J.; Mollabashi, A.; Takayanagi, T.; Taki, Y. Timelike entanglement entropy.J. High Energy Phys.2023,2023, 52

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    1: Foundations; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005

    Weinberg, S.The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 1: Foundations; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    Giacomini, E

    Giacomini, F.; Castro-Ruiz, E.; Brukner, Č. Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames.Nat. Commun.2019,10, 494.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08155-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08155-0 2019

  45. [45]

    Structure of fermion density matrices.Rev

    Coleman, A.J. Structure of fermion density matrices.Rev. Mod. Phys.1963,35, 668

    work page 1963

  46. [46]

    Non-inertial quantum clock frames lead to non-Hermitian dynamics.Commun

    Paiva, I.L.; Te’eni, A.; Peled, B.Y.; Cohen, E.; Aharonov, Y. Non-inertial quantum clock frames lead to non-Hermitian dynamics.Commun. Phys.2022,5, 298

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    When does a particle arrive?Quantum2023,7, 968.https://doi.org/ 10.22331/q-2023-03-30-968

    Roncallo, S.; Sacha, K.; Maccone, L. When does a particle arrive?Quantum2023,7, 968.https://doi.org/ 10.22331/q-2023-03-30-968

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2023-03-30-968 2023

  48. [48]

    Feng, F.F

    Cafasso, D.; Pranzini, N.; Malo, J.Y.; Giovannetti, V.; Chiofalo, M. Quantum time and the time-dilation in- duced interaction transfer mechanism.Phys. Rev. D2024,110, 106014.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 110.106014

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd

  49. [49]

    Relativistic limits on the discretization and temporal resolution of a quantum clock.Entropy2025, 27, 1068.https://doi.org/10.3390/e27101068

    Favalli, T. Relativistic limits on the discretization and temporal resolution of a quantum clock.Entropy2025, 27, 1068.https://doi.org/10.3390/e27101068

    work page doi:10.3390/e27101068

  50. [50]

    Quantum model for black holes and clocks.arXiv2026, arXiv:2601.07437.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.07437

    Coppo, A.; Pranzini, N.; Verrucchi, P. Quantum model for black holes and clocks.arXiv2026, arXiv:2601.07437.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.07437

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.07437

  51. [51]

    Parallel-in-time quantum simulation via Page and Wootters quantum time.Phys

    Diaz, N.L.; Braccia, P.; Larocca, M.; Matera, J.M.; Rossignoli, R.; Cerezo, M. Parallel-in-time quantum simulation via Page and Wootters quantum time.Phys. Rev. Res.2025,7, 033294.https://doi.org/10. 1103/wpnf-4nnn

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    An Algebraic Approach to Quantum Field Theory

    Haag, R.; Kastler, D. An algebraic approach to quantum field theory.J. Math. Phys.1964,5, 848–861. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1704187

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1704187 1964

  53. [53]

    Mecánica Cuántica en Espacio-Tiempo

    Díaz, N.L. Mecánica Cuántica en Espacio-Tiempo. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina, 8 October 2024.https://doi.org/10.35537/10915/171518

    work page doi:10.35537/10915/171518 2024

  54. [54]

    Quantum fingerprinting

    Buhrman, H.; Cleve, R.; Watrous, J.; De Wolf, R. Quantum fingerprinting.Phys. Rev. Lett.2001,87, 167902. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.167902

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.167902 2001

  55. [55]

    Lorentz symmetry breaking as a quantum field theory regulator.Phys

    Visser, M. Lorentz symmetry breaking as a quantum field theory regulator.Phys. Rev. D2009,80, 025011. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.025011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.025011

  56. [56]

    Boost invariant regulator for field theories.Int

    Polonyi, J. Boost invariant regulator for field theories.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A2019,34, 1950017.https: //doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X19500179. 34

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x19500179

  57. [57]

    Lorentz-breaking weighted measures as quantum field theory reg- ulators.Phys

    Cartas-Fuentevilla, R.; Mendez-Ugalde, A. Lorentz-breaking weighted measures as quantum field theory reg- ulators.Phys. Lett. B2022,830, 137146.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137146

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137146 2022

  58. [58]

    Channel capacity of relativistic quantum communication with rapid interac- tion.Phys

    Tjoa, E.; Gallock-Yoshimura, K. Channel capacity of relativistic quantum communication with rapid interac- tion.Phys. Rev. D2022,105, 085011.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.085011. 35

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.085011

  59. [59]

    Maggiore, M.A Modern Introduction to Quantum Field Theory; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005

    work page 2005

  60. [60]

    All pure fermionic non-gaussian states are magic states for matchgate computations.Phys

    Hebenstreit, M.; Jozsa, R.; Kraus, B.; Strelchuk, S.; Yoganathan, M. All pure fermionic non-gaussian states are magic states for matchgate computations.Phys. Rev. Lett.2019,123, 080503.https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.123.080503

    work page 2019