Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 7 cited by

Solar neutrinos seen in dark matter detectors now yield competitive measurements of the weak mixing angle and of new vector interactions.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 19:51 UTC pith:LLB5PLMP

load-bearing objection A solid, useful update adding LZ solar CEνNS data to the XENONnT/PandaX-4T picture, with a real but not fatal caveat about the simplified LZ background model. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.00554 v2 pith:LLB5PLMP submitted 2026-02-28 hep-ph hep-ex

Testing light and heavy vector mediators with solar CEνNS measurements

Valentina De Romeri , Dimitrios K. Papoulias , Federica Pompa , Gonzalo Sanchez Garcia , Christoph A. Ternes This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scatteringsolar 8B neutrinosdark matter direct detectionweak mixing anglenonstandard neutrino interactionslight vector mediatorsLMA-darkliquid xenon detectors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to show that the recent detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering from solar 8B neutrinos in three liquid-xenon dark matter experiments turns those experiments into precision neutrino observatories. Using a combined spectral fit of XENONnT, PandaX-4T and LZ nuclear-recoil data, it extracts the 8B solar neutrino flux and the weak mixing angle at low momentum transfer, obtaining sin^2θ_W = 0.20+0.05−0.06. It then asks whether the same data can constrain new vector interactions, both heavy effective nonstandard interactions and light vector mediators. The answer is yes: the bounds are comparable to those from dedicated reactor and spallation-source CEνNS experiments, and the combined fit excludes the LMA-dark NSI region at more than 3σ. A sympathetic reader would care because it shows a new, largely independent channel for testing the Standard Model at low energies.

Core claim

The central claim is that solar CEνNS data from dark matter detectors are already competitive with dedicated neutrino experiments. On the Standard Model side, the combined XENONnT+PandaX-4T+LZ analysis determines the 8B flux normalization as (4.3+1.3−1.3)×10^6 cm^-2 s^-1, consistent with solar models, and measures the low-energy weak mixing angle as sin^2θ_W = 0.20+0.05−0.06. On the new-physics side, the combined fit sets 90% CL bounds on vector NSI couplings with both u and d quarks, including tau-flavor parameters not accessible to spallation or reactor CEνNS, and excludes the parameter region needed for the LMA-dark oscillation solution at more than 3σ. For light vector mediators, the sam

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the CEνNS cross section on xenon nuclei, written in the Standard Model as dσ/dT_N = (G_F^2 m_N/π) (Q_V^SM)^2 F_W^2(q^2)(1 − m_N T_N/(2E_ν^2)), where Q_V^SM = g_p^V Z + g_n^V N is the weak vector charge. New vector interactions enter either by replacing Q_V^SM with the NSI-modified charge Q_V^NSI or by multiplying the cross section by a propagator factor [1 + κ C_V/(√2 G_F Q_V^SM(m_V^2 + 2m_N T_N))]^2 for a light mediator. The analysis compares binned S2 spectra from the three detectors using a χ^2 with nuisance parameters for the 8B flux (12%) and the accidental-coincidence background (30%); the LZ dataset dominates the combined result.

Load-bearing premise

The LZ spectral analysis assumes the only background in the [155,645] phd region is the accidental-coincidence component, with surface, radiogenic-neutron, and other-neutrino backgrounds neglected; if those contribute to the 19 observed events, the extracted signal and every derived constraint would be biased.

What would settle it

Check the 19 LZ events against the full background model: if a spectral re-analysis that includes surface events, radiogenic neutrons, and other neutrino fluxes yields a best-fit 8B flux significantly below the paper's (4.3+1.3−1.3)×10^6 cm^-2 s^-1, the central signal extraction—and with it the weak mixing angle and NSI bounds—would not survive. Alternatively, a future XENONnT/PandaX-4T/LZ fit with doubled statistics that drives sin^2θ_W away from the SM value would test the electroweak claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Future exposures of these detectors will sharpen the weak mixing angle measurement at low momentum transfer, approaching the precision of dedicated reactor CEνNS experiments.
  • The combined solar-CEνNS constraints on ε_ττ NSI fill a channel that spallation and reactor CEνNS cannot reach.
  • The more-than-3σ exclusion of the LMA-dark NSI region reduces the parameter space for large NSI solutions to the solar neutrino problem.
  • Light mediator bounds from solar CEνNS become the leading neutrino-scattering limits in parts of the m_V ≳ 10 MeV parameter space, complementing beam-dump and collider constraints.
  • Combining detectors with different N/Z ratios breaks the universal-light-mediator degeneracy, a step that the paper shows individual experiments cannot do alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the LZ background model is incomplete—for example if surface or radiogenic-neutron events populate the [155,645] phd window—the extracted 8B flux and all derived constraints would shift; re-running the fit with a full background model is a direct test.
  • The tau-flavor NSI sensitivity unique to solar CEνNS suggests that a global fit including future oscillation data could separate propagation effects from detection effects, something the paper's simplified flavor-diagonal light-mediator scenarios do not attempt.
  • The method should transfer to next-generation xenon detectors with lower thresholds, where lower-energy pp and 7Be solar neutrinos might become visible; those events would extend the momentum-transfer reach of the weak mixing angle test.
  • For the universal light mediator, the paper shows the degeneracy is N/Z-dependent; a dedicated combined analysis with germanium or argon CEνNS data could close the allowed strip entirely, as the paper notes requires different target materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a combined spectral analysis of solar 8B neutrino CEνNS data reported by XENONnT, PandaX-4T, and LZ, using the nuclear-recoil measurements in the S2/phd ROI of each experiment. From these data the authors extract the 8B flux normalization and the weak mixing angle at low momentum transfer, obtaining sin^2θW = 0.20+0.05−0.06 in the combined fit. They then use the same datasets to constrain nonstandard neutrino interactions with u and d quarks, including flavor-changing couplings with solar matter effects, and to derive bounds on light vector mediators in universal-coupling and B−L models. The central claims are that the combined analysis is dominated by LZ, that it excludes the LMA-dark NSI region at more than 3σ, and that dark matter detectors already provide bounds on vector mediators competitive with dedicated terrestrial neutrino experiments.

Significance. If the analysis is sound, this is a timely and useful result. The paper is the first to include the recent LZ solar-CEνNS data in a combined spectral fit with XENONnT and PandaX-4T, and it extends the phenomenology to cover both NSI with full parameter correlations and two light-mediator benchmarks. The authors make a genuine effort to treat solar neutrino propagation consistently, to profile over all NSI parameters, and to compare with a broad set of terrestrial, collider, and astrophysical constraints. The resulting bounds, particularly for the B−L mediator, would demonstrate that current dark matter detectors are becoming competitive neutrino observatories. However, as detailed below, the robustness of the central quantitative claims depends on a simplified background model for LZ and on the substantiation of the LMA-dark exclusion significance.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Eq. (25)] The LZ analysis models only the accidental coincidence (AC) background, with N_i = R_i(1+α) + B_i^AC(1+β), assigning AC a 30% normalization uncertainty and omitting all other background sources. The official LZ analysis of the same [155,645] phd ROI includes surface events, radiogenic neutrons, and additional neutrino-induced backgrounds. The text calls AC 'dominant' but does not quantify the rate or spectral shape of the omitted components in the five bins. With only 19 observed events, an unmodeled background of even one event per bin could bias the extracted signal R_i (possibly by being absorbed into the AC normalization), and this bias would propagate to the combined sin^2θW, the NSI contours, and especially the B−L light-mediator bound, which the authors state is dominated by LZ (Sec. IV.C). The consistency of the total extracted flux with the official LZ value is reassuring but do
  2. [Sec. IV.B, Fig. 4] The abstract and Sec. IV.B state that the combined analysis excludes the LMA-dark NSI parameter space at more than 3σ. However, the only shown contours in Fig. 4 are 90% CL, and no 3σ contour or Δχ² value for the LMA-dark benchmark is provided. The gray LMA-dark regions in Fig. 4 appear to be outside the 90% contours, but the claimed significance is not self-evident from the figure. Since this is a central quantitative claim, the authors should show the 3σ (or higher) contours for the combined analysis or present a Δχ² profile/table for representative LMA-dark parameter points.
  3. [Sec. II.B and footnote 3] The adiabatic approximation is adopted for the solar neutrino propagation analysis, and the authors state in the text and footnote that in the combined analysis no NSI parameter points lead to non-adiabatic evolution, while for PandaX-4T alone some points may be non-adiabatic. Since the combined analysis includes PandaX-4T data, it is not fully clear how individual non-adiabatic parameter regions were treated in the joint likelihood, and whether the conclusion of adiabaticity is an a posteriori check or an imposed restriction. A brief description of the procedure—e.g., indicating that non-adiabatic points are simply excluded from the combined fit or that their effect is negligible because the combined result is LZ-dominated—would remove an ambiguity that currently leaves the consistency of the combined NSI constraints open.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II (Introduction)] The sentence 'Second, the new interactions directly effect detection by contributing to the CEνNS cross section' is duplicated immediately after its first occurrence. Please remove the duplicate.
  2. [Sec. II.A, Eq. (3)] In the text after Eq. (3), 'gνV (gνV)' should read 'gνV (gqV)' for the neutrino and quark couplings, respectively.
  3. [Fig. 9] The figure uses g_V and g_{B−L} for the coupling axes, but the caption does not define the normalization. Please state explicitly that g_V denotes the universal neutrino-quark coupling and g_{B−L} the gauge coupling in the B−L model, including the U(1)' charge assignments used (the κ factor in Eq. (20)).
  4. [References] Refs. [157] and [158] refer to the same paper (Ghosh et al., Phys. Rev. D110, 075032 (2024)); one of the entries is redundant. Also check other reference entries for consistent arXiv/DOI data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: bounds are derived by comparing independently computed cross-section predictions to binned data in a standard profile likelihood.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The SM 8B flux and sin^2 theta_W determinations are obtained by a binned likelihood (Eqs. 25-26) comparing predicted rates, built from the cross sections in Section II, to the observed LZ counts; no fitted parameter is then reused as an input to the same or another fit. The NSI and light-mediator constraints modify the cross section (Eqs. 19-20) and are then compared to the same data; they do not assume the quantities they claim to constrain. The LZ analysis uses only the accidental-coincidence background with a profiled normalization, which is a modeling assumption and a possible systematic concern, but it is not circular because the AC normalization is a nuisance parameter, not a physics 'prediction' that is subsequently re-derived. The XENONnT and PandaX-4T analyses are cited from previous work [57] by overlapping authors, but that is a normal method citation to a previously published, independent analysis of public data, and the paper's new combined and LZ results are computed here; the LZ data dominate the combined constraints. The LMA-dark exclusion follows from the fitted NSI contours, and the B-L bound follows from constructive interference enhancing the rate relative to LZ data, both are direct hypothesis tests rather than inputs to the fit. No equation reduces to another by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard CEνNS formalism and solar neutrino propagation, with the main free parameters being the fitted physics quantities and nuisance parameters. No new particle or entity is introduced by this work; the universal vector and B−L mediators are pre-existing models used as benchmarks.

free parameters (5)
  • 8B neutrino flux normalization Φ = combined 4.3+1.3−1.3 ×10^6 cm^-2 s^-1 (1σ)
    Extracted from the three datasets; in other fits it is a nuisance parameter with a 12% Gaussian constraint.
  • weak mixing angle sin^2θW = 0.20+0.05−0.06 (combined, 1σ)
    Determined from the spectral shape with flux fixed to SSM prediction with 12% uncertainty.
  • NSI parameters εqV_ℓℓ′ (u,d; ee,μμ,ττ,eμ,eτ,μτ) = 1σ intervals in Table I
    Twelve real parameters fitted to the recoil spectra; profiled in the combined analysis.
  • light mediator mass mV and coupling gV (or gB−L) = 90% CL exclusion regions in Fig. 9
    Scanned parameters in the light-mediator interpretation.
  • nuisance parameters α, β = pulled in χ² (Eq. 26)
    Account for 8B flux prediction (12%) and AC background normalization (30%) uncertainties in LZ.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Solar 8B flux and production distribution from B16-GS98 high-metallicity model [51,93]
    Used to compute the unoscillated flux and production-point averaging (Eq. 12).
  • domain assumption Adiabatic neutrino evolution in the Sun
    The paper verifies this for the combined fit, but notes it may fail for PandaX-4T alone (Sec. IIB).
  • standard math Two-flavor reduction and Parke formula for Pee (Eqs. 5-7)
    Standard solar neutrino oscillation result used to compute survival probability.
  • domain assumption Klein-Nystrand form factor (Eq. 18)
    Nuclear form factor used in the CEνNS cross section.
  • domain assumption The vector NSI Lagrangian (Eq. 1) is a valid effective description; gauge-invariance issues acknowledged but not addressed
    The paper notes the parametrization is not gauge-invariant but cites model realizations for light mediators (Sec. IIA).
  • ad hoc to paper Only accidental-coincidence background contributes to the LZ ROI (Eq. 25)
    The LZ analysis omits other background components; this is not flagged as a limitation.
  • domain assumption sin^2θ23 = 0.5, and other oscillation parameters fixed from global fits [86-89]
    Used to fix the flavor composition of the solar neutrino flux at Earth.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 25485 in / 12592 out tokens · 123310 ms · 2026-08-02T19:51:13.334198+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The recent observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering from solar $^8$B neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments has inaugurated the \emph{neutrino fog} era, highlighting the extended potential of these experiments as precision neutrino observatories. Recent measurements by the XENONnT, PandaX-4T, and LUX-ZEPLIN experiments provide new opportunities to test Standard Model predictions and to probe physics beyond it, in complementarity with dedicated neutrino facilities. We perform a combined analysis of nuclear recoil data from these three facilities to extract information on the solar $^8$B neutrino flux normalization and on the weak mixing angle at low-momentum transfer. We further investigate the impact of new vector interactions on the solar neutrino event rate, deriving constraints on nonstandard neutrino interactions and on scenarios with light vector mediators. Our results demonstrate that dark matter detectors are rapidly becoming complementary to terrestrial neutrino experiments in probing neutrino interactions, and already set competitive bounds on both light and heavy vector mediators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.00554 by Christoph A. Ternes, Dimitrios K. Papoulias, Federica Pompa, Gonzalo Sanchez Garcia, Valentina De Romeri.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The allowed regions at 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Searches for heavy neutral lepton decays at spallation neutron sources

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Current and future COHERENT detectors at the SNS can set competitive limits on HNL–neutrino mixings through pion/muon DAR production and in-detector e+e− decays, with muon mixing offering the strongest near-term reach.

  2. $\texttt{SNuDD}$: Solar Neutrinos for Direct Detection

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    SNuDD computes solar-neutrino recoil spectra with non-standard interactions and derives NSI limits from xenon direct-detection data that are competitive with dedicated neutrino experiments.

  3. Phenomenological implications of the high-precision COHERENT germanium CE$\nu$NS data

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    High-precision COHERENT germanium CEνNS data yields state-of-the-art constraints on the weak mixing angle, neutrino charge radii, germanium neutron radius, and non-standard neutrino interactions via global analysis wi...

  4. Phenomenological implications of the high-precision COHERENT germanium CE$\nu$NS data

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Analysis of new COHERENT germanium CEνNS data yields updated constraints on the weak mixing angle, neutrino charge radii, germanium neutron rms radius, and bounds on neutrino non-standard interactions via global fits.

  5. New benchmarks for direct detection of freeze-in dark matter in vector portal models

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Freeze-in at low reheating temperatures allows MeV-scale dark matter in vector portal models to be probed by future direct detection experiments in nuclear recoils for 50-500 MeV masses and via enhanced solar neutrino...

  6. Sterile Neutrino Mixing Parameters from Solar-Neutrino Coherent Scattering

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Future dark matter detectors with ~3000 ton-yr exposure could probe sterile neutrino mixing with νμ and ντ in parameter space not reached by long-baseline or atmospheric searches.

  7. New constraints on physics within and beyond the standard model from the latest CONUS datasets

    hep-ex 2026-05 conditional novelty 4.0

    New reactor antineutrino data from CONUS germanium detectors improve upper limits on neutrino magnetic moment to 5.18e-11 mu_B, millicharge to 1.76e-12 e0, NSI scale to 145 GeV, and yield sin^2 theta_W = 0.28 +0.03/-0...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    3 For the analysis of PandaX-4T data alone, some parameter points may lie in non-adiabatic regions

    CEνNS cross section in the Standard Model Within the SM, the differential cross section for CEνNS with respect to the nuclear recoil energy, TN , can be written as [2, 97] dσνℓN dTN ⏐⏐⏐⏐ SM = G2 FmN π ( QSM V,ℓ )2 F 2 W (|q|2) ( 1− mNTN 2E2ν ) ,(16) 2 We have verified that the contribution fromhepneutrinos is negligible, while all other solar neutrino com...

  2. [2]

    CEνNS cross section with NSI NSI lead to a flavor-dependent modification of the SM weak charge defined in Eq. (17), such that(Q SM V,ℓ )2→(Q NSI V,ℓ )2 with [97] ( QNSI V,ℓ )2 = [( gp V,ℓ + 2εuV ℓℓ +εdV ℓℓ ) Z+ ( gn V,ℓ +εuV ℓℓ + 2εdV ℓℓ ) N ]2 + ∑ ℓ′̸=ℓ ⏐⏐⏐ ( 2εuV ℓℓ′ +εdV ℓℓ′ ) Z+ ( εuV ℓℓ′ + 2εdV ℓℓ′ ) N ⏐⏐⏐ 2 .(19) For an incomingν ℓ, the CEνNS cross ...

  3. [3]

    Next Generation EU

    CEνNS cross section in presence of new light vector mediators In the presence of a light vector mediator of massm V , the CEνNS cross section is modified to [101] dσνℓN dTN ⏐⏐⏐⏐ V (Eν,TN ) = [ 1 +κ CV√ 2GFQSM V,ℓ ( m2 V + 2mNTN ) ]2 dσνℓN dTN ⏐⏐⏐⏐ SM ,(20) where the squared bracket explicitly accounts for the interference between the SM amplitude and the ...

    2013

  4. [4]

    Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: Terrestrial and astrophysical applications,

    M. Abdullahet al., “Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: Terrestrial and astrophysical applications,”arXiv:2203.07361 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current,

    D. Z. Freedman, “Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current,” Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 1389–1392

    1974

  6. [6]

    Principles and Applications of a Neutral Current Detector for Neutrino Physics and Astronomy,

    A. Drukier and L. Stodolsky, “Principles and Applications of a Neutral Current Detector for Neutrino Physics and Astronomy,”Phys. Rev. D30(1984) 2295. [4]COHERENTCollaboration, D. Akimovet al., “Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering,”Science357(2017) 1123–1126,arXiv:1708.01294 [nucl-ex]. 18 [5]COHERENTCollaboration, D. Akimovet al., ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1984

  7. [7]

    First detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on germanium,

    S. Adamskiet al., “First detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on germanium,” arXiv:2406.13806 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering from Reactor Antineutrinos,

    J. Colaresi, J. I. Collar, T. W. Hossbach, C. M. Lewis, and K. M. Yocum, “Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering from Reactor Antineutrinos,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129no. 21, (2022) 211802,arXiv:2202.09672 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Direct observation of coherent elastic antineutrino–nucleus scattering,

    N. Ackermannet al., “Direct observation of coherent elastic antineutrino–nucleus scattering,”Nature 643no. 8074, (2025) 1229–1233,arXiv:2501.05206 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Detectability of Certain Dark Matter Candidates,

    M. W. Goodman and E. Witten, “Detectability of Certain Dark Matter Candidates,”Phys. Rev. D 31(1985) 3059

    1985

  11. [11]

    Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status,

    M. Schumann, “Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status,”J. Phys. G46 no. 10, (2019) 103003,arXiv:1903.03026 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*,

    J. Billardet al., “Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*,”Rept. Prog. Phys.85 no. 5, (2022) 056201,arXiv:2104.07634 [hep-ex]. [13]XENONCollaboration, E. Aprileet al., “First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment,”Phys. Rev. Lett.131no. 4, (2023) 041003,arXiv:2303.14729 [hep-ex]. [14]LZCollaboration, J. Aalbe...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [16]

    New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches,

    C. A. J. O’Hare, “New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches,”Phys. Rev. Lett.127no. 25, (2021) 251802,arXiv:2109.03116 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [17]

    Neutrino Backgrounds to Dark Matter Searches,

    J. Monroe and P. Fisher, “Neutrino Backgrounds to Dark Matter Searches,”Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 033007,arXiv:0706.3019 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  15. [18]

    Can Solar Neutrinos be a Serious Background in Direct Dark Matter Searches?,

    J. D. Vergados and H. Ejiri, “Can Solar Neutrinos be a Serious Background in Direct Dark Matter Searches?,”Nucl. Phys. B804(2008) 144–159,arXiv:0805.2583 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  16. [19]

    Neutrino Coherent Scattering Rates at Direct Dark Matter Detectors,

    L. E. Strigari, “Neutrino Coherent Scattering Rates at Direct Dark Matter Detectors,”New J. Phys. 11(2009) 105011,arXiv:0903.3630 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  17. [20]

    Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments,

    J. Billard, L. Strigari, and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, “Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments,”Phys. Rev. D89no. 2, (2014) 023524, arXiv:1307.5458 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [21]

    New light mediators and the neutrino fog: Implications from XENONnT nuclear recoil data,

    V. De Romeri, A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, and R. Srivastava, “New light mediators and the neutrino fog: Implications from XENONnT nuclear recoil data,”arXiv:2512.08853 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [22]

    Exploring nu Signals in Dark Matter Detectors,

    R. Harnik, J. Kopp, and P. A. N. Machado, “Exploring nu Signals in Dark Matter Detectors,”JCAP 07(2012) 026,arXiv:1202.6073 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  20. [23]

    New constraint on neutrino magnetic moment and neutrino millicharge from LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter search results,

    M. Atzori Corona, W. M. Bonivento, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, and F. Dordei, “New constraint on neutrino magnetic moment and neutrino millicharge from LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter search results,” Phys. Rev. D107no. 5, (2023) 053001,arXiv:2207.05036 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [24]

    pp solar neutrinos at DAR WIN,

    A. de Gouvˆ ea, E. McGinness, I. Martinez-Soler, and Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, “pp solar neutrinos at DAR WIN,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 9, (2022) 096017,arXiv:2111.02421 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  22. [25]

    Testing neutrino electromagnetic properties at current and future dark matter experiments,

    C. Giunti and C. A. Ternes, “Testing neutrino electromagnetic properties at current and future dark matter experiments,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 9, (2023) 095044,arXiv:2309.17380 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [26]

    Physics from solar neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments,

    D. G. Cerde˜ no, M. Fairbairn, T. Jubb, P. A. N. Machado, A. C. Vincent, and C. Bœhm, “Physics from solar neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments,”JHEP05(2016) 118, arXiv:1604.01025 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 048 (2016)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [27]

    Non-standard interactions of solar neutrinos in dark matter experiments,

    B. Dutta, S. Liao, L. E. Strigari, and J. W. Walker, “Non-standard interactions of solar neutrinos in dark matter experiments,”Phys. Lett. B773(2017) 242–246,arXiv:1705.00661 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [28]

    Geoneutrinos in Large Direct Detection Experiments,

    G. B. Gelmini, V. Takhistov, and S. J. Witte, “Geoneutrinos in Large Direct Detection Experiments,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 9, (2019) 093009,arXiv:1812.05550 [hep-ph]. 19

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [29]

    Solar Neutrinos as a Signal and Background in Direct-Detection Experiments Searching for Sub-GeV Dark Matter With Electron Recoils,

    R. Essig, M. Sholapurkar, and T.-T. Yu, “Solar Neutrinos as a Signal and Background in Direct-Detection Experiments Searching for Sub-GeV Dark Matter With Electron Recoils,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 9, (2018) 095029,arXiv:1801.10159 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [30]

    Light new physics in XENON1T,

    C. Boehm, D. G. Cerdeno, M. Fairbairn, P. A. N. Machado, and A. C. Vincent, “Light new physics in XENON1T,”Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 115013,arXiv:2006.11250 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  28. [31]

    Light vector mediators facing XENON1T data,

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri, L. J. Flores, and D. K. Papoulias, “Light vector mediators facing XENON1T data,”Phys. Lett. B809(2020) 135681,arXiv:2006.12457 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [32]

    Sensitivity of direct detection experiments to neutrino magnetic dipole moments,

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, R. Branada, O. G. Miranda, and G. Sanchez Garcia, “Sensitivity of direct detection experiments to neutrino magnetic dipole moments,”JHEP12(2020) 178, arXiv:2008.05080 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [33]

    Solar neutrino probes of the muon anomalous magnetic moment in the gaugedU(1) Lµ−Lτ ,

    D. W. P. d. Amaral, D. G. Cerdeno, P. Foldenauer, and E. Reid, “Solar neutrino probes of the muon anomalous magnetic moment in the gaugedU(1) Lµ−Lτ ,”JHEP12(2020) 155,arXiv:2006.11225 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [34]

    A global analysis strategy to resolve neutrino NSI degeneracies with scattering and oscillation data,

    B. Dutta, R. F. Lang, S. Liao, S. Sinha, L. Strigari, and A. Thompson, “A global analysis strategy to resolve neutrino NSI degeneracies with scattering and oscillation data,”JHEP09(2020) 106, arXiv:2002.03066 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  32. [35]

    Astrophysical constraints on nonstandard coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering,

    A. M. Suliga and I. Tamborra, “Astrophysical constraints on nonstandard coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 8, (2021) 083002,arXiv:2010.14545 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [36]

    ConfirmingU(1) Lµ−Lτ as a solution for(g−2) µ with neutrinos,

    D. W. P. Amaral, D. G. Cerdeno, A. Cheek, and P. Foldenauer, “ConfirmingU(1) Lµ−Lτ as a solution for(g−2) µ with neutrinos,”Eur. Phys. J. C81no. 10, (2021) 861,arXiv:2104.03297 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  34. [37]

    Light vector mediators at direct detection experiments,

    V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, and C. A. Ternes, “Light vector mediators at direct detection experiments,”JHEP05(2024) 165,arXiv:2402.05506 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [38]

    A next-generation liquid xenon observatory for dark matter and neutrino physics,

    J. Aalberset al., “A next-generation liquid xenon observatory for dark matter and neutrino physics,” J. Phys. G50no. 1, (2023) 013001,arXiv:2203.02309 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2023

  36. [39]

    Measuring the sterile neutrino mass in spallation source and direct detection experiments,

    D. Alonso-Gonz´ alez, D. W. P. Amaral, A. Bariego-Quintana, D. Cerde˜ no, and M. de los Rios, “Measuring the sterile neutrino mass in spallation source and direct detection experiments,”JHEP 12(2023) 096,arXiv:2307.05176 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [40]

    A direct detection view of the neutrino NSI landscape,

    D. W. P. Amaral, D. Cerdeno, A. Cheek, and P. Foldenauer, “A direct detection view of the neutrino NSI landscape,”JHEP07(2023) 071,arXiv:2302.12846 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [41]

    Constraining low scale Dark Hypercharge symmetry at spallation, reactor and Dark Matter direct detection experiments,

    A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, H. Prajapati, and R. Srivastava, “Constraining low scale Dark Hypercharge symmetry at spallation, reactor and Dark Matter direct detection experiments,” arXiv:2411.04197 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [42]

    Neutrino electromagnetic properties and sterile dipole portal in light of the first solar CEνNS data,

    V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, C. A. Ternes, and M. T´ ortola, “Neutrino electromagnetic properties and sterile dipole portal in light of the first solar CEνNS data,”JCAP05 (2025) 080,arXiv:2412.14991 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [43]

    Testing the dark side of neutrino oscillations with the solar neutrino fog at dark matter experiments,

    J. Gehrlein and T. Kushwaha, “Testing the dark side of neutrino oscillations with the solar neutrino fog at dark matter experiments,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 9, (2025) 095032,arXiv:2508.14166 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  41. [44]

    Clarity through the neutrino fog: constraining new forces in dark matter detectors,

    P. Blanco-Mas, P. Coloma, G. Herrera, P. Huber, J. Kopp, I. M. Shoemaker, and Z. Tabrizi, “Clarity through the neutrino fog: constraining new forces in dark matter detectors,”JHEP08(2025) 043, arXiv:2411.14206 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [45]

    When backgrounds become signals: neutrino interactions in xenon-based dark matter detectors,

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, and M. Sestu, “When backgrounds become signals: neutrino interactions in xenon-based dark matter detectors,”arXiv:2509.22178 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [46]

    Solar neutrino constraints on light mediators through coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,

    M. Demirci and M. F. Mustamin, “Solar neutrino constraints on light mediators through coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 1, (2024) 015021,arXiv:2312.17502 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [47]

    Standard Model Tested with Neutrinos,

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, and C. A. Ternes, “Standard Model Tested with Neutrinos,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 23, (2025) 231803,arXiv:2504.05272 [hep-ph]. [48]XENONCollaboration, E. Aprileet al., “First Indication of Solar 8BNeutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024...

    arXiv 2025

  45. [51]

    A new Generation of Standard Solar Models,

    N. Vinyoles, A. M. Serenelli, F. L. Villante, S. Basu, J. Bergstr ¨om, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, C. Pe˜ na Garay, and N. Song, “A new Generation of Standard Solar Models,”Astrophys. J.835no. 2, (2017) 202,arXiv:1611.09867 [astro-ph.SR]. [52]SNOCollaboration, B. Aharmimet al., “Combined Analysis of all Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [53]

    Implications of first neutrino-induced nuclear recoil measurements in direct detection experiments: Probing nonstandard interaction via CEνNS,

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, N. Mishra, and L. Strigari, “Implications of first neutrino-induced nuclear recoil measurements in direct detection experiments: Probing nonstandard interaction via CEνNS,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 5, (2025) 055007,arXiv:2409.02003 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [54]

    Constraints on neutrino nonstandard interactions from COHERENT, PandaX-4T and XENONnT,

    G. Li, C.-Q. Song, F.-J. Tang, and J.-H. Yu, “Constraints on neutrino nonstandard interactions from COHERENT, PandaX-4T and XENONnT,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 3, (2025) 035002, arXiv:2409.04703 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [55]

    A Comprehensive Effective Field Theory Framework for Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering,

    G. Li, C.-Q. Song, F.-J. Tang, and J.-H. Yu, “A Comprehensive Effective Field Theory Framework for Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering,”arXiv:2601.19883 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  49. [56]

    Measuring Solar neutrino Fluxes in Direct Detection Experiments in the Presence of Light Mediators,

    S.-y. Xia, “Measuring Solar neutrino Fluxes in Direct Detection Experiments in the Presence of Light Mediators,”arXiv:2410.01167 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [57]

    Bounds on new neutrino interactions from the first CEνNS data at direct detection experiments,

    V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, and C. A. Ternes, “Bounds on new neutrino interactions from the first CEνNS data at direct detection experiments,”JCAP05(2025) 012,arXiv:2411.11749 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [58]

    First constraint on the weak mixing angle using direct detection experiments,

    T. N. Maity and C. Boehm, “First constraint on the weak mixing angle using direct detection experiments,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 5, (2025) 053001,arXiv:2409.04385 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [59]

    Neutrino non-standard interactions and dark matter searches with multi-ton scale detectors,

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, N. Rojas, and M. H. G. Tytgat, “Neutrino non-standard interactions and dark matter searches with multi-ton scale detectors,”JHEP03(2018) 197,arXiv:1712.09667 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [60]

    Neutrino Discovery Limit of Dark Matter Direct Detection Experiments in the Presence of Non-Standard Interactions,

    M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, “Neutrino Discovery Limit of Dark Matter Direct Detection Experiments in the Presence of Non-Standard Interactions,”JHEP07(2018) 019,arXiv:1803.03650 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [61]

    Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering in multi-ton scale dark matter experiments: Classification of vector and scalar interactions new physics signals,

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, B. Dutta, S. Liao, and L. E. Strigari, “Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering in multi-ton scale dark matter experiments: Classification of vector and scalar interactions new physics signals,”JHEP12(2019) 124,arXiv:1910.12437 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [62]

    Dark matter detectors as a novel probe for light new physics,

    A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, and R. Srivastava, “Dark matter detectors as a novel probe for light new physics,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 1, (2022) 013001,arXiv:2112.03309 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  56. [63]

    Detecting beyond the standard model interactions of solar neutrinos in low-threshold dark matter detectors,

    T. Schwemberger and T.-T. Yu, “Detecting beyond the standard model interactions of solar neutrinos in low-threshold dark matter detectors,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 1, (2022) 015002, arXiv:2202.01254 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  57. [64]

    Dark Matter and Exotic Neutrino Interactions in Direct Detection Searches,

    E. Bertuzzo, F. F. Deppisch, S. Kulkarni, Y. F. Perez Gonzalez, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, “Dark Matter and Exotic Neutrino Interactions in Direct Detection Searches,”JHEP04(2017) 073, arXiv:1701.07443 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [65]

    Neutrino physics with dark matter detectors,

    B. Dutta and L. E. Strigari, “Neutrino physics with dark matter detectors,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69(2019) 137–161,arXiv:1901.08876 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [66]

    General COHERENT constraints on neutrino nonstandard interactions,

    C. Giunti, “General COHERENT constraints on neutrino nonstandard interactions,”Phys. Rev. D 101no. 3, (2020) 035039,arXiv:1909.00466 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  60. [67]

    Recent probes of standard and non-standard neutrino physics with nuclei,

    D. K. Papoulias, T. S. Kosmas, and Y. Kuno, “Recent probes of standard and non-standard neutrino physics with nuclei,”Front. in Phys.7(2019) 191,arXiv:1911.00916 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [68]

    Implications of the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) with Liquid Argon,

    O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, O. Sanders, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Implications of the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) with Liquid Argon,”JHEP05(2020) 130,arXiv:2003.12050 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 01, 067 (2021)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  62. [69]

    Physics implications of a combined analysis of COHERENT CsI and LAr data,

    V. De Romeri, O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Physics implications of a combined analysis of COHERENT CsI and LAr data,”JHEP04(2023) 035,arXiv:2211.11905 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  63. [70]

    Global constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons,

    P. Coloma, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. P. Pinheiro, and S. Urrea, “Global constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons,”JHEP08(2023) 032, arXiv:2305.07698 [hep-ph]. 21

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  64. [71]

    Bounds on new physics with data of the Dresden-II reactor experiment and COHERENT,

    P. Coloma, I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, L. Larizgoitia, F. Monrabal, and S. Palomares-Ruiz, “Bounds on new physics with data of the Dresden-II reactor experiment and COHERENT,”JHEP 05(2022) 037,arXiv:2202.10829 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  65. [72]

    Implications of the first CONUS+ measurement of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,

    V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, and G. Sanchez Garcia, “Implications of the first CONUS+ measurement of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 7, (2025) 075025, arXiv:2501.17843 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  66. [73]

    Status of non-standard neutrino interactions,

    T. Ohlsson, “Status of non-standard neutrino interactions,”Rept. Prog. Phys.76(2013) 044201, arXiv:1209.2710 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [74]

    Non standard neutrino interactions: current status and future prospects,

    O. G. Miranda and H. Nunokawa, “Non standard neutrino interactions: current status and future prospects,”New J. Phys.17no. 9, (2015) 095002,arXiv:1505.06254 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [75]

    Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions,

    Y. Farzan and M. Tortola, “Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions,”Front. in Phys.6 (2018) 10,arXiv:1710.09360 [hep-ph]. [76]BOREXINOCollaboration, V. Antonelliet al., “Constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions from Borexino extended data-set,”arXiv:2602.08685 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  69. [77]

    EFT analysis of New Physics at COHERENT,

    V. Bres´ o-Pla, A. Falkowski, M. Gonz´ alez-Alonso, and K. Mons´ alvez-Pozo, “EFT analysis of New Physics at COHERENT,”JHEP05(2023) 074,arXiv:2301.07036 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  70. [78]

    Improving the global SMEFT picture with bounds on neutrino NSI,

    P. Coloma, E. Fern´ andez-Mart ´ ınez, J. L´ opez-Pav´ on, X. Marcano, D. Naredo-Tuero, and S. Urrea, “Improving the global SMEFT picture with bounds on neutrino NSI,”JHEP02(2025) 137, arXiv:2411.00090 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [79]

    Large gauge invariant non-standard neutrino interactions,

    M. B. Gavela, D. Hernandez, T. Ota, and W. Winter, “Large gauge invariant non-standard neutrino interactions,”Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 013007,arXiv:0809.3451 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  72. [80]

    Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions with Matter from Physics Beyond the Standard Model,

    S. Antusch, J. P. Baumann, and E. Fernandez-Martinez, “Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions with Matter from Physics Beyond the Standard Model,”Nucl. Phys. B810(2009) 369–388, arXiv:0807.1003 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  73. [81]

    Lepton Flavor Violating Non-Standard Interactions via Light Mediators,

    Y. Farzan and I. M. Shoemaker, “Lepton Flavor Violating Non-Standard Interactions via Light Mediators,”JHEP07(2016) 033,arXiv:1512.09147 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  74. [82]

    A model for large non-standard interactions of neutrinos leading to the LMA-Dark solution,

    Y. Farzan, “A model for large non-standard interactions of neutrinos leading to the LMA-Dark solution,”Phys. Lett. B748(2015) 311–315,arXiv:1505.06906 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  75. [83]

    Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions and Neutral Gauge Bosons,

    J. Heeck, M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann, and S. Vogl, “Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions and Neutral Gauge Bosons,”SciPost Phys.6no. 3, (2019) 038,arXiv:1812.04067 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  76. [84]

    Flavor Gauge Models Below the Fermi Scale,

    K. S. Babu, A. Friedland, P. A. N. Machado, and I. Mocioiu, “Flavor Gauge Models Below the Fermi Scale,”JHEP12(2017) 096,arXiv:1705.01822 [hep-ph]. [85]Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions: A Status Report, vol. 2. 2019.arXiv:1907.00991 [hep-ph]. [86]JUNOCollaboration, A. Abuslemeet al., “First measurement of reactor neutrino oscillations at JUNO,”arXiv:251...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  77. [87]

    2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture,

    P. F. de Salas, D. V. Forero, S. Gariazzo, P. Mart ´ ınez-Mirav´ e, O. Mena, C. A. Ternes, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture,”JHEP02(2021) 071,arXiv:2006.11237 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [88]

    Neutrino masses and mixing: Entering the era of subpercent precision,

    F. Capozzi, W. Giar` e, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Melchiorri, and A. Palazzo, “Neutrino masses and mixing: Entering the era of subpercent precision,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 9, (2025) 093006, arXiv:2503.07752 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  79. [89]

    NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, “NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,”JHEP12(2024) 216, arXiv:2410.05380 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  80. [90]

    The Solar Neutrino Problem and Three Neutrino Oscillations,

    T.-K. Kuo and J. T. Pantaleone, “The Solar Neutrino Problem and Three Neutrino Oscillations,” Phys. Rev. Lett.57(1986) 1805–1808

    1986

Showing first 80 references.