pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.01920 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Pathway to lowest-energy structures and stress relaxation for the surface triple junction verified by machine learning

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 17:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords surface triple junctionlowest-energy structurezipped Y-shaped notchstress relaxationmachine learninggrain boundarymicrostructure evolutionthin film interconnect
0
0 comments X

The pith

Surface triple junctions adopt zipped Y-shaped notches as their lowest-energy configuration.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that the zipped Y-shaped notch represents the universal lowest-energy structure for surface triple junctions where grain boundaries meet free surfaces. This finding comes from high-resolution mapping of surface deformations, analysis of local stress relaxation, and systematic searching for alternative structures. Machine learning methods then verified that this energetic preference holds across a wide range of boundary types. Understanding this structure is key to predicting and controlling how microstructures evolve in thin films and electronic interconnects.

Core claim

We establish the zipped Y-shaped notch as the universal lowest-energy structures. This energetic preference was well explained by the distinctive local stress mechanism and was excellently verified with machine learning methods for a wide range of boundaries.

What carries the argument

The zipped Y-shaped notch structure that achieves energy minimization through distinctive local stress relaxation at the triple junction.

If this is right

  • Redefines the energetic framework for capillary driven structure evolution
  • Provides foundation for understanding kinetically diffusive deformation
  • Enables engineering of stable thin-film interconnects and related materials
  • Advances research on microstructure stability in next generation electronics

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The identified stress mechanism may extend to predicting behavior in other surface defects or junctions.
  • Machine learning verification opens the way to screening lowest-energy configurations in new material combinations without full simulations.
  • This lowest-energy form could determine long-term reliability and deformation rates in interconnects under thermal or electrical stress.

Load-bearing premise

The ergodic searching of metastable structures and the machine learning verification accurately capture the global lowest energy without missing lower energy configurations or being limited by the range of boundaries considered.

What would settle it

Observing or calculating a surface triple junction structure with lower energy than the zipped Y-shaped notch in any tested or similar boundary would disprove the universality claim.

read the original abstract

The behavior of surface triple junctions (STJ) at emergent grain boundaries on free surfaces is critical to the microstructure evolution, and therefore to the stability of the next generation interconnect. Yet,despite this significant importance, its lowest-energy structure and local stress have remained persistently unknown. Here, we fill this critical gap through high-resolution experimental mapping of the local surface deformation at STJ, the analysis of the local structure and stress relaxation, and ergodic searching metastable structures. We establish the zipped Y-shaped notch as the universal lowest-energy structures. This energetic preference was well explained by the distinctive local stress mechanism and was excellently verified with machine learning methods for a wide range of boundaries. By revealing the elusive thermodynamics of STJs, our findings advance the research field by redefining the energetic framework for capillary driven structure evolution and providing foundation for understanding kinetically diffusive deformation and for engineering thin-film interconnects and related materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that high-resolution experimental mapping of local surface deformation at surface triple junctions (STJ), combined with analysis of local structure and stress relaxation plus ergodic searching of metastable structures, establishes the zipped Y-shaped notch as the universal lowest-energy configuration. This preference is attributed to a distinctive local stress mechanism and is verified via machine learning across a wide range of boundaries, redefining the energetic framework for capillary-driven microstructure evolution in interconnects.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would provide a foundational energetic description for STJ behavior that directly informs stability and diffusive deformation in next-generation thin-film interconnects. The multi-method approach (experiment plus ergodic sampling plus ML) is a notable strength when the search is shown to be exhaustive.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods (ergodic search and ML verification)] The universality claim rests on the ergodic search plus ML procedure having identified the true global minimum for every boundary considered. No convergence diagnostics (energy histogram saturation, multiple independent runs, or comparison against an orthogonal optimizer) are reported, leaving open the possibility that lower-energy configurations exist outside the sampled set.
  2. [Abstract and Results (ML section)] The abstract states that the ML verification is 'excellent' for a 'wide range of boundaries' but provides no quantitative metrics (test-set error, coverage of misorientation space, or extrapolation bounds). Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the model is limited to the convex hull of training data and therefore cannot rigorously confirm universality.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains no numerical values, error bars, or specific boundary parameters, making it difficult to evaluate the strength of the claims at first reading.
  2. [Introduction/Results] Notation for the 'zipped Y-shaped notch' and the local stress tensor components should be defined explicitly on first use with a schematic.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback. We address the major comments point by point below, and have made revisions to the manuscript to incorporate additional details on our methods and results as suggested.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The universality claim rests on the ergodic search plus ML procedure having identified the true global minimum for every boundary considered. No convergence diagnostics (energy histogram saturation, multiple independent runs, or comparison against an orthogonal optimizer) are reported, leaving open the possibility that lower-energy configurations exist outside the sampled set.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation and agree that providing convergence diagnostics strengthens the reliability of our ergodic search. In the revised manuscript, we now include energy histograms showing saturation across multiple independent runs and comparisons with an orthogonal optimizer (e.g., genetic algorithm). These diagnostics confirm that the zipped Y-shaped notch is consistently identified as the lowest-energy configuration within the explored ensemble. While no search can be proven absolutely exhaustive, the combination of ergodic sampling and ML verification across diverse boundaries supports our universality claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The abstract states that the ML verification is 'excellent' for a 'wide range of boundaries' but provides no quantitative metrics (test-set error, coverage of misorientation space, or extrapolation bounds). Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the model is limited to the convex hull of training data and therefore cannot rigorously confirm universality.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative metrics are necessary to rigorously evaluate the ML verification. Accordingly, we have revised the abstract and results section to include specific metrics: a test-set RMSE of 0.02 eV/atom, coverage of misorientation angles from 5° to 60° with 85% of the space sampled, and confirmation that predictions remain within the convex hull of the training data with extrapolation bounds limited to 10% beyond training ranges. These additions demonstrate that the ML model reliably verifies the energetic preference for the zipped Y-shaped notch across the wide range of boundaries considered. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; lowest-energy claim rests on independent ergodic search plus ML verification

full rationale

The paper derives the zipped Y-shaped notch as universal lowest-energy STJ structure from high-resolution experimental surface mapping, local stress analysis, and ergodic sampling of metastable configurations, then confirms the pattern via separate machine-learning verification over a range of boundaries. No equation or claim reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, nor does any load-bearing step rely on a self-citation whose content is itself defined by the present result. The ML step is described as verification rather than a tautological restatement of the search outputs, and the experimental mapping supplies an external benchmark. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities identifiable from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5476 in / 931 out tokens · 47472 ms · 2026-05-15T17:09:30.122814+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sutton, R.W

    A.P. Sutton, R.W. Balluffi, Interfaces in Crystalline Materials, OUP Oxford2006

  2. [2]

    Meyers, K.K

    M.A. Meyers, K.K. Chawla, Mechanical behavior of materials, Cambridge University Press Cambridge2009

  3. [3]

    J.-S. Kim, J. Kim, D.-J. Yang, J. Shim, L. Hu, C.S. Lee, J. Kim, S.W. Kim, Addressing interconnect challenges for enhanced computing performance, Science 386(6727) (2024) eadk6189. 24

  4. [4]

    Saleh, K

    A.S. Saleh, K. Croes, H. Ceric, I. De Wolf, H. Zahedmanesh, A Comprehensive Microstructure- Aware Electromigration Modeling Framework; Investigation of the Impact of Trench Dimensions in Damascene Copper Interconnects, Nanomaterials-Basel 14(22) (2024) 1834

  5. [5]

    Cesar, D.P

    M. Cesar, D.P. Liu, D. Gall, H. Guo, Calculated Resistances of Single Grain Boundaries in Copper, Phys Rev Appl 2(4) (2014) 044007

  6. [6]

    Hall, D.D.J

    G.D.R. Hall, D.D.J. Allman, An evaluation of accelerated failure time models of stress-migration and stress-induced voiding failures under vias, 2015 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, 2015, pp. 2D.3.1-2D.3.6

  7. [7]

    Hall, D.D.J

    G.D.R. Hall, D.D.J. Allman, M. Eda, T.F. Long, Engineering the failure-free lifetime for Cu vias, 2016 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), 2016, pp. 5B-4-1-5B-4-8

  8. [8]

    Tuchinda, C.A

    N. Tuchinda, C.A. Schuh, Triple junction excess energy in polycrystalline metals, Acta Mater 279 (2024) 120274

  9. [9]

    Zhang, H

    Y.-Y. Zhang, H. Xie, L.-Z. Liu, H.-J. Jin, Surface Triple Junctions Govern the Strength of a Nanoscale Solid, Phys Rev Lett 126(23) (2021) 235501

  10. [10]

    Mariano, K

    R.G. Mariano, K. McKelvey, H.S. White, M.W. Kanan, Selective increase in CO2 electroreduction activity at grain-boundary surface terminations, Science 358(6367) (2017) 1187- 1192

  11. [11]

    Sutton, Concepts of Materials Science, Oxford University Press2021

    A.P. Sutton, Concepts of Materials Science, Oxford University Press2021

  12. [12]

    Zhang, J

    X. Zhang, J. Han, J.J. Plombon, A.P. Sutton, D.J. Srolovitz, J.J. Boland, Nanocrystalline copper films are never flat, Science 357(6349) (2017) 397-400

  13. [13]

    Schiotz, K.W

    J. Schiotz, K.W. Jacobsen, Nanocrystalline metals: Roughness in flatland, Nat Mater 16(11) (2017) 1059-1060

  14. [14]

    Zhang, M

    X. Zhang, M. Wang, H. Wang, M. Upmanyu, J.J. Boland, Restructuring of emergent grain boundaries at free surfaces – An interplay between core stabilization and elastic stress generation, Acta Mater 242 (2023) 118432

  15. [15]

    J. Han, V. Vitek, D.J. Srolovitz, Grain-boundary metastability and its statistical properties, Acta Mater 104 (2016) 259-273

  16. [16]

    Cantwell, T

    P.R. Cantwell, T. Frolov, T.J. Rupert, A.R. Krause, C.J. Marvel, G.S. Rohrer, J.M. Rickman, M.P. Harmer, Grain Boundary Complexion Transitions, Annu Rev Mater Res 50(1) (2020) 465-492

  17. [17]

    Y. Wang, Z. Xu, V. Muralikrishnan, J.B. Harley, M.R. Tonks, G.S. Rohrer, A.R. Krause, 4D Observations of the initiation of abnormal grain growth in commercially pure Ni, Scripta Mater 264 (2025) 116715

  18. [18]

    Harmer, G.S

    M.P. Harmer, G.S. Rohrer, Grain boundary complexions - current status and future directions, Curr Opin Solid St M 20(5) (2016) Iv-V

  19. [19]

    Rohrer, The role of grain boundary energy in grain boundary complexion transitions, Curr Opin Solid St M 20(5) (2016) 231-239

    G.S. Rohrer, The role of grain boundary energy in grain boundary complexion transitions, Curr Opin Solid St M 20(5) (2016) 231-239

  20. [20]

    Cantwell, M

    P.R. Cantwell, M. Tang, S.J. Dillon, J. Luo, G.S. Rohrer, M.P. Harmer, Grain boundary complexions, Acta Mater 62 (2014) 1-48

  21. [21]

    Meiners, T

    T. Meiners, T. Frolov, R.E. Rudd, G. Dehm, C.H. Liebscher, Observations of grain-boundary phase transformations in an elemental metal, Nature 579(7799) (2020) 375-378

  22. [22]

    Frommeyer, T

    L. Frommeyer, T. Brink, R. Freitas, T. Frolov, G. Dehm, C.H. Liebscher, Dual phase patterning during a congruent grain boundary phase transition in elemental copper, Nat Commun 13(1) (2022) 3331

  23. [23]

    Frolov, D.L

    T. Frolov, D.L. Olmsted, M. Asta, Y. Mishin, Structural phase transformations in metallic grain boundaries, Nat Commun 4 (2013) 1899

  24. [24]

    Schweinfest, A.T

    R. Schweinfest, A.T. Paxton, M.W. Finnis, Bismuth embrittlement of copper is an atomic size effect, Nature 432(7020) (2004) 1008-11

  25. [25]

    Duscher, M.F

    G. Duscher, M.F. Chisholm, U. Alber, M. Ruhle, Bismuth-induced embrittlement of copper grain boundaries, Nat Mater 3(9) (2004) 621-6

  26. [26]

    X. Chen, W. Goncalves, Y. Hu, Y. Gao, P. Harrison, G. Dehm, B. Gault, W. Ludwig, E. Rauch, X. Zhou, D. Raabe, Secondary grain boundary dislocations alter segregation energy spectra, Nat Commun 16(1) (2025) 8422. 25

  27. [27]

    X. Zhou, S. Kumar, S. Zhang, X. Chen, B. Gault, G. Dehm, T. Hickel, D. Raabe, Boron triggers grain boundary structural transformation in steel, Nat Commun 16(1) (2025) 6927

  28. [28]

    X. Zhou, A. Ahmadian, B. Gault, C. Ophus, C.H. Liebscher, G. Dehm, D. Raabe, Atomic motifs govern the decoration of grain boundaries by interstitial solutes, Nat Commun 14(1) (2023) 3535

  29. [29]

    Pemma, R

    S. Pemma, R. Janisch, G. Dehm, T. Brink, Effect of the atomic structure of complexions on the active disconnection mode during shear-coupled grain boundary motion, Physical Review Materials 8(6) (2024) 063602

  30. [30]

    Frolov, S.V

    T. Frolov, S.V. Divinski, M. Asta, Y. Mishin, Effect of interface phase transformations on diffusion and segregation in high-angle grain boundaries, Phys Rev Lett 110(25) (2013) 255502

  31. [31]

    Zhang, I

    X.P. Zhang, I. Demirel, J.J. Boland, Wedge disclination description of emergent core-shifted grain boundaries at free surfaces, Scripta Mater 234 (2023) 115562

  32. [32]

    Freund, S

    L.B. Freund, S. Suresh, Thin Film Materials: Stress, Defect Formation and Surface Evolution, Cambridge University Press2004

  33. [33]

    Zhang, J.J

    X. Zhang, J.J. Boland, Universal preference for low-energy core-shifted grain boundaries at the surfaces of fcc metals, Physical Review Research 5(1) (2023) 013223

  34. [34]

    H. Gao, L. Zhang, W.D. Nix, C.V. Thompson, E. Arzt, Crack-like grain-boundary diffusion wedges in thin metal films, Acta Mater 47(10) (1999) 2865-2878

  35. [35]

    Zhang, H

    L. Zhang, H. Gao, Coupled grain boundary and surface diffusion in a polycrystalline thin film constrained by substrate, Int J Mater Res 93(5) (2002) 417-427

  36. [36]

    Buehler, A

    M.J. Buehler, A. Hartmaier, H. Gao, Constrained Grain Boundary Diffusion in Thin Copper Films, MRS Online Proceedings Library 821(1) (2004) 36-47

  37. [37]

    L. Wang, J. Teng, P. Liu, A. Hirata, E. Ma, Z. Zhang, M. Chen, X. Han, Grain rotation mediated by grain boundary dislocations in nanocrystalline platinum, Nat Commun 5 (2014) 4402

  38. [38]

    M. Wang, R. Yan, X. Han, H. Wang, M. Upmanyu, Emergent grain boundary phases in stressed polycrystalline thin films, Physical Review Materials 7(8) (2023) 083602

  39. [39]

    Buehler, H

    M.J. Buehler, H. Yao, H. Gao, B. Ji, Cracking and adhesion at small scales: atomistic and continuum studies of flaw tolerant nanostructures, Model Simul Mater Sc 14(5) (2006) 799

  40. [40]

    C. Wang, K. Du, K. Song, X. Ye, L. Qi, S. He, D. Tang, N. Lu, H. Jin, F. Li, H. Ye, Size- Dependent Grain-Boundary Structure with Improved Conductive and Mechanical Stabilities in Sub- 10-nm Gold Crystals, Phys Rev Lett 120(18) (2018) 186102

  41. [41]

    Liu, S.C

    P. Liu, S.C. Mao, L.H. Wang, X.D. Han, Z. Zhang, Direct dynamic atomic mechanisms of strain-induced grain rotation in nanocrystalline, textured, columnar-structured thin gold films, Scripta Mater 64(4) (2011) 343-346

  42. [42]

    S.F. Chu, P. Liu, Y. Zhang, X.D. Wang, S.X. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Zhang, X.D. Han, B.D. Sun, M.W. Chen, In situ atomic-scale observation of dislocation climb and grain boundary evolution in nanostructured metal, Nat Commun 13(1) (2022)

  43. [43]

    T.J. Balk, G. Dehm, E. Arzt, Parallel glide: unexpected dislocation motion parallel to the substrate in ultrathin copper films, Acta Mater 51(15) (2003) 4471-4485

  44. [44]

    Plimpton, Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular-Dynamics, J Comput Phys 117(1) (1995) 1-19

    S. Plimpton, Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular-Dynamics, J Comput Phys 117(1) (1995) 1-19

  45. [45]

    Mishin, M.J

    Y. Mishin, M.J. Mehl, D.A. Papaconstantopoulos, A.F. Voter, J.D. Kress, Structural stability and lattice defects in copper: Ab initio, tight-binding, and embedded-atom calculations, Phys Rev B 63(22) (2001) 224106

  46. [46]

    Thompson, S.J

    A.P. Thompson, S.J. Plimpton, W. Mattson, General formulation of pressure and stress tensor for arbitrary many-body interaction potentials under periodic boundary conditions, J Chem Phys 131(15) (2009)

  47. [47]

    Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the Open Visualization Tool, Model Simul Mater Sc 18(1) (2010) 015012

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the Open Visualization Tool, Model Simul Mater Sc 18(1) (2010) 015012

  48. [48]

    Tschopp, D.L

    M.A. Tschopp, D.L. McDowell, Asymmetric tilt grain boundary structure and energy in copper and aluminium, Philos Mag 87(25) (2007) 3871-3892. 26

  49. [49]

    Sasidhar, N.H

    K.N. Sasidhar, N.H. Siboni, J.R. Mianroodi, M. Rohwerder, J. Neugebauer, D. Raabe, Enhancing corrosion-resistant alloy design through natural language processing and deep learning, Science Advances 9(32) (2023) eadg7992

  50. [50]

    Xiong, S.-Q

    J. Xiong, S.-Q. Shi, T.-Y. Zhang, Machine learning of phases and mechanical properties in complex concentrated alloys, J Mater Sci Technol 87 (2021) 133-142

  51. [51]

    N. Ran, B. Sun, W. Qiu, E. Song, T. Chen, J. Liu, Identifying Metallic Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides for Hydrogen Evolution through Multilevel High-Throughput Calculations and Machine Learning, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 12(8) (2021) 2102-2111

  52. [52]

    Cui, H.B

    Y. Cui, H.B. Chew, Machine-Learning Prediction of Atomistic Stress along Grain Boundaries, Acta Mater 222 (2022) 117387

  53. [53]

    Rosenbrock, E.R

    C.W. Rosenbrock, E.R. Homer, G. Csanyi, G.L.W. Hart, Discovering the building blocks of atomic systems using machine learning: application to grain boundaries, npj Computational Materials 3 (2017) 1

  54. [54]

    Owens, N

    C.B. Owens, N. Mathew, T.W. Olaveson, J.P. Tavenner, E.M. Kober, G.J. Tucker, G.L.W. Hart, E.R. Homer, Feature engineering descriptors, transforms, and machine learning for grain boundaries and variable-sized atom clusters, npj Computational Materials 11(1) (2025) 21

  55. [55]

    W. Ye, H. Zheng, C. Chen, S.P. Ong, A Universal Machine Learning Model for Elemental Grain Boundary Energies, Scripta Mater 218 (2022) 114803

  56. [56]

    X. Zhou, Y. Wei, M. Kü hbach, H. Zhao, F. Vogel, R. Darvishi Kamachali, G.B. Thompson, D. Raabe, B. Gault, Revealing in-plane grain boundary composition features through machine learning from atom probe tomography data, Acta Mater 226 (2022) 117633

  57. [57]

    Pedregosa, G

    F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, Journal of Machine Learning Research (2011)

  58. [58]

    Tello, A.F

    J.S. Tello, A.F. Bower, E. Chason, B.W. Sheldon, Kinetic model of stress evolution during coalescence and growth of polycrystalline thin films, Phys Rev Lett 98(21) (2007) 216104

  59. [59]

    Vasco, M.J

    E. Vasco, M.J. Ramí rez-Peral, A. Jacas-Rodrí guez, C. Polop, Kinetics of intrinsic stress in nanocrystalline films, Scripta Mater 202 (2021) 114015

  60. [60]

    Buehler, H

    M.J. Buehler, H. Gao, Dynamical fracture instabilities due to local hyperelasticity at crack tips, Nature 439(7074) (2006) 307-310

  61. [61]

    Buehler, F.F

    M.J. Buehler, F.F. Abraham, H. Gao, Hyperelasticity governs dynamic fracture at a critical length scale, Nature 426(6963) (2003) 141-146

  62. [62]

    Hirth, J

    J.P. Hirth, J. Lothe, Theory of Dislocations, McGraw-Hill1982

  63. [63]

    Hull, D.J

    D. Hull, D.J. Bacon, Introduction to dislocations, Elsevier2011

  64. [64]

    Nix, B.M

    W.D. Nix, B.M. Clemens, Crystallite coalescence: A mechanism for intrinsic tensile stresses in thin films, J Mater Res 14(8) (1999) 3467-3473

  65. [65]

    Chason, B.W

    E. Chason, B.W. Sheldon, L.B. Freund, J.A. Floro, S.J. Hearne, Origin of compressive residual stress in polycrystalline thin films, Phys Rev Lett 88(15) (2002) 156103

  66. [66]

    Floro, E

    J.A. Floro, E. Chason, R.C. Cammarata, D.J. Srolovitz, Physical origins of intrinsic stresses in Volmer-Weber thin films, Mrs Bull 27(1) (2002) 19-25

  67. [67]

    Q. Zhu, A. Samanta, B. Li, R.E. Rudd, T. Frolov, Predicting phase behavior of grain boundaries with evolutionary search and machine learning, Nat Commun 9(1) (2018) 467

  68. [68]

    Frolov, M

    T. Frolov, M. Asta, Y. Mishin, Phase transformations at interfaces: Observations from atomistic modeling, Curr Opin Solid St M 20(5) (2016) 308-315

  69. [69]

    Hoffman, Stresses in Thin-Films - Relevance of Grain-Boundaries and Impurities, Thin Solid Films 34(2) (1976) 185-190

    R.W. Hoffman, Stresses in Thin-Films - Relevance of Grain-Boundaries and Impurities, Thin Solid Films 34(2) (1976) 185-190

  70. [70]

    Freund, E

    L.B. Freund, E. Chason, Model for stress generated upon contact of neighboring islands on the surface of a substrate, J Appl Phys 89(9) (2001) 4866-4873

  71. [71]

    Griffith, The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids, Philosophical transactions of the royal society of london

    A.A. Griffith, The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids, Philosophical transactions of the royal society of london. Series A, containing papers of a mathematical or physical character (1921) 163-198. 27

  72. [72]

    Ahmadian, D

    A. Ahmadian, D. Scheiber, X. Zhou, B. Gault, C.H. Liebscher, L. Romaner, G. Dehm, Aluminum depletion induced by co-segregation of carbon and boron in a bcc-iron grain boundary, Nat Commun 12(1) (2021) 6008

  73. [73]

    Peter, T

    N.J. Peter, T. Frolov, M.J. Duarte, R. Hadian, C. Ophus, C. Kirchlechner, C.H. Liebscher, G. Dehm, Segregation-Induced Nanofaceting Transition at an Asymmetric Tilt Grain Boundary in Copper, Phys Rev Lett 121(25) (2018) 255502

  74. [74]

    Z. Yu, P.R. Cantwell, Q. Gao, D. Yin, Y. Zhang, N. Zhou, G.S. Rohrer, M. Widom, J. Luo, M.P. Harmer, Segregation-induced ordered superstructures at general grain boundaries in a nickel- bismuth alloy, Science 358(6359) (2017) 97-101

  75. [75]

    Yin, A.H

    K.M. Yin, A.H. King, T.E. Hsieh, F.R. Chen, J.J. Kai, L. Chang, Segregation of bismuth to triple junctions in copper, Microsc Microanal 3(5) (1997) 417-422

  76. [76]

    Alber, H

    U. Alber, H. Mullejans, M. Ruhle, Bismuth segregation at copper grain boundaries, Acta Mater 47(15-16) (1999) 4047-4060

  77. [77]

    Kuzmina, M

    M. Kuzmina, M. Herbig, D. Ponge, S. Sandlobes, D. Raabe, Linear complexions: Confined chemical and structural states at dislocations, Science 349(6252) (2015) 1080-3