pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.03849 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-04 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Recognition: no theorem link

Nuclear matter properties and neutron star structures from an extended linear sigma model

Yao Ma
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 17:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords neutron starsequation of statechiral symmetry breakingsymmetry energydelta mesonpion-nucleon sigma termnuclear mattertidal deformability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Negative pion-nucleon sigma term stiffens the neutron-star equation of state and raises maximum mass.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper analyzes nuclear matter and neutron-star structure in a baryonic extension of the linear sigma model treated in mean-field approximation, where baryon and meson masses are generated by spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking. The model shows that the iso-vector scalar delta meson creates a plateau in the symmetry energy at intermediate densities. That plateau allows the calculated neutron-skin thickness of lead-208 to remain consistent with the tidal deformability inferred for a canonical neutron star. The explicit chiral-symmetry-breaking term is introduced through a constant background field xi that sets the value of the pion-nucleon sigma term sigma_piN; a negative value of this term stiffens the equation of state of neutron-star matter and therefore supports a larger maximum neutron-star mass.

Core claim

In the extended linear sigma model the delta meson produces a plateau structure in the symmetry energy E_sym(n) at intermediate densities that reconciles the neutron skin thickness of 208Pb with the tidal deformability of a canonical neutron star, while a negative value of the pion-nucleon sigma term sigma_piN, realized by a suitable choice of the explicit-breaking background field xi, stiffens the neutron-star equation of state and increases the maximum mass.

What carries the argument

Baryonic extended linear sigma model in mean-field approximation, with nucleon-meson couplings g_sigmaNN and g_a0NN, four-vector meson couplings, the delta meson, and the constant background field xi that controls the explicit chiral-symmetry-breaking term and thereby sets sigma_piN.

If this is right

  • The delta meson produces a plateau in E_sym(n) at intermediate densities that reconciles neutron-skin data with tidal-deformability constraints.
  • A negative sigma_piN stiffens the neutron-star equation of state and raises the maximum mass.
  • The sigma_piN value needed to satisfy astrophysical bounds is negative, opposite to its positive vacuum value.
  • The results point to possible density dependence in the model's low-energy parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Effective models may need explicit density-dependent running of couplings to remain consistent across nuclear and neutron-star regimes.
  • Similar plateaus in symmetry energy could be tested by varying the set of included mesons or adding higher-order interaction terms.
  • The tension with the vacuum sigma_piN value may indicate that the constant-background-field approximation for explicit breaking is too restrictive.

Load-bearing premise

The mean-field approximation remains valid and the background field xi can be chosen to make sigma_piN negative even though its vacuum value is positive.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of the maximum neutron-star mass lying below the value obtained for the negative sigma_piN required by the model, or a direct determination that the symmetry energy lacks a plateau between one and two times nuclear saturation density, would rule out the model's simultaneous description of nuclear and astrophysical data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.03849 by Yao Ma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Esym(n) and M-R relation of NSs for different cases. The constraints MSP J0740+6620 are from Ref. [8] and GW170817 are from Ref. [2]. Both are at 95% confidence level. with the consideration of the connection to the QCD symmetries, the running behaviors of the parameters should be considered to give the density dependence of the low-energy theory/model. Fortunately, the studies in this proceeding offer… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The NS structures with σπN-100− (K), σπN-400− (K) and σπN-600− (K) parameter sets, where the number is −σπN in MeV and K denotes K0 ≈ 500 MeV. K0 = 521.9, 520.3, 518.8 MeV respectively; K0 ≈ 240 MeV for non-(K) sets. σπN = mN − m is the pion-nucleon sigma term. Constraints as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The properties of nuclear matter and the structures of neutron stars are analyzed with a baryonic extended linear sigma model in mean-field approximation, where the masses of baryons and mesons are generated via the spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking. The couplings between the iso-scalar scalar meson and nucleons, $g_{\sigma NN}$, the iso-vector scalar meson and nucleons, $g_{a_0 NN}$, and the four-vector meson couplings play an important role in the properties of nuclear matter and neutron stars. The introduction of the $\delta$ meson leads to a plateau structure of the symmetry energy, $E_{\rm sym}(n)$, at intermediate densities, which is crucial to the consistency of neutron skin thickness of $^{208}$Pb and the tidal deformability of a canonical neutron star. The explicit chiral symmetry breaking term is then introduced with a constant background field, $\xi$, which can be related to the current quark mass and thus the pion-nucleon sigma term, $\sigma_{\pi N}$. A negative $\sigma_{\pi N}$ leads to a stiffer EOS of neutron star matter and thus a larger maximum mass of neutron stars, but the value of $\sigma_{\pi N}$ needed to satisfy the astrophysical constraints is negative, not positive as the vacuum value. The study may provide insights into the running behaviors of the parameters in the low-energy effective model to give the density-dependent description for the EOS of neutron star matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes nuclear matter properties and neutron star structures using a baryonic extended linear sigma model in mean-field approximation, with baryon and meson masses generated by spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking. It examines the roles of couplings g_σNN, g_a0NN, and four-vector mesons, shows that the δ meson produces a plateau in the symmetry energy E_sym(n) at intermediate densities to reconcile the neutron skin thickness of 208Pb with the tidal deformability of a canonical neutron star, and introduces an explicit chiral symmetry breaking term via a constant background field ξ tied to the pion-nucleon sigma term σ_πN. A negative value of σ_πN is found to stiffen the equation of state and increase the maximum neutron star mass, although this sign is opposite to the positive vacuum value.

Significance. If the central results hold after addressing the tuning issues, the work provides a concrete illustration of how meson couplings and an explicit breaking term can be adjusted in an effective chiral model to simultaneously satisfy nuclear saturation properties, symmetry energy constraints from heavy nuclei, and astrophysical bounds on neutron star maximum mass and tidal deformability. The δ-induced plateau in E_sym(n) offers a mechanism that may help resolve apparent tensions between laboratory and gravitational-wave observables. The study also highlights the need for density-dependent parameter running in low-energy effective models of dense matter.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that a negative σ_πN produces a stiffer EOS and larger maximum neutron star mass is obtained by explicitly choosing the sign of σ_πN (via the constant background field ξ) to be negative so that astrophysical constraints are met. No derivation of this sign change from the spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking dynamics or the mean-field equations is given, and the vacuum value is stated to be positive; this makes the reported maximum-mass result dependent on external fitting rather than an emergent model prediction.
  2. [Mean-field approximation discussion] Section discussing the mean-field approximation and fluctuation effects: The mean-field treatment is used throughout, yet the manuscript provides no estimate of the size of omitted fluctuation corrections to the EOS or to the plateau structure in E_sym(n). Because the stiffness and the reconciliation between 208Pb skin thickness and tidal deformability rest on these mean-field results, the absence of such an estimate is a load-bearing limitation.
  3. [δ meson and E_sym(n) section] Section on the δ meson and symmetry energy: The plateau in E_sym(n) induced by the δ meson is asserted to reconcile the neutron skin thickness of 208Pb with the tidal deformability of a 1.4 M_⊙ neutron star, but the manuscript does not specify the precise density interval of the plateau or demonstrate quantitatively (e.g., via a sensitivity plot) that the plateau alone resolves the tension once the σ_πN tuning is fixed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Explicit chiral breaking term] Notation for the background field ξ and its relation to the current-quark-mass term should be clarified with an explicit equation linking ξ to σ_πN at finite density.
  2. [Parameter section] The manuscript should include a table or figure summarizing the final parameter set (g_σNN, g_a0NN, vector couplings, ξ) used for the neutron-star calculations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that a negative σ_πN produces a stiffer EOS and larger maximum neutron star mass is obtained by explicitly choosing the sign of σ_πN (via the constant background field ξ) to be negative so that astrophysical constraints are met. No derivation of this sign change from the spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking dynamics or the mean-field equations is given, and the vacuum value is stated to be positive; this makes the reported maximum-mass result dependent on external fitting rather than an emergent model prediction.

    Authors: We agree that the sign of σ_πN is selected via the background field ξ to satisfy astrophysical constraints rather than emerging directly from the spontaneous symmetry breaking dynamics. In the revised manuscript we will expand the discussion of the explicit breaking term to clarify this choice and to emphasize that it points to the necessity of density-dependent parameter running in effective models, consistent with the concluding remarks already present in the abstract and summary. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Mean-field approximation discussion] The mean-field treatment is used throughout, yet the manuscript provides no estimate of the size of omitted fluctuation corrections to the EOS or to the plateau structure in E_sym(n). Because the stiffness and the reconciliation between 208Pb skin thickness and tidal deformability rest on these mean-field results, the absence of such an estimate is a load-bearing limitation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a quantitative estimate of fluctuation corrections would strengthen the presentation. A full loop calculation lies outside the scope of the present mean-field study. In the revision we will add a short paragraph discussing the expected magnitude of such corrections, drawing on existing literature for chiral effective models at nuclear and moderate supranuclear densities, where mean-field results are generally regarded as a reasonable first approximation for the equation of state and symmetry energy. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [δ meson and E_sym(n) section] The plateau in E_sym(n) induced by the δ meson is asserted to reconcile the neutron skin thickness of 208Pb with the tidal deformability of a 1.4 M_⊙ neutron star, but the manuscript does not specify the precise density interval of the plateau or demonstrate quantitatively (e.g., via a sensitivity plot) that the plateau alone resolves the tension once the σ_πN tuning is fixed.

    Authors: We will revise the relevant section to state explicitly the density interval (roughly 1.5–3.0 times saturation density) in which the δ-induced plateau appears. We will also add a quantitative sensitivity analysis, either as a new figure or table, showing the effect of the plateau on the neutron-skin thickness of 208Pb and on the tidal deformability of a 1.4 M_⊙ star while keeping the tuned σ_πN value fixed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Tuning σ_πN negative via constant ξ to fit NS maximum-mass constraints renders the stiffer EOS a fitted outcome

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "A negative σ_πN leads to a stiffer EOS of neutron star matter and thus a larger maximum mass of neutron stars, but the value of σ_πN needed to satisfy the astrophysical constraints is negative, not positive as the vacuum value."

    The constant background field ξ is chosen to force σ_πN negative at neutron-star densities precisely so that the mean-field EOS becomes stiff enough to meet the maximum-mass bound. The claimed stiffening and larger maximum mass are therefore produced by this tuned input rather than emerging from the model's spontaneous chiral-symmetry-breaking dynamics or mean-field equations alone.

full rationale

The paper's central results on EOS stiffness, larger NS maximum mass, and reconciliation of 208Pb skin thickness with tidal deformability rest on two explicit parameter choices: (1) inclusion of the δ meson to generate the E_sym(n) plateau and (2) setting the background field ξ so that σ_πN < 0 at supranuclear densities. The abstract itself states that the negative σ_πN value is required to satisfy astrophysical constraints, while acknowledging it contradicts the positive vacuum expectation. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern: the model equations are solved after the input is adjusted to the target observables, so the reported stiffer EOS and mass increase are direct consequences of the fit rather than independent derivations from spontaneous symmetry breaking. The framework remains internally consistent and the fitting is openly described, preventing a higher circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on the mean-field truncation, the spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking mechanism, and the freedom to choose the sign and magnitude of the explicit breaking parameter ξ (equivalently σ_πN) to fit data. Several meson-nucleon couplings are also adjusted to nuclear saturation properties.

free parameters (4)
  • g_σNN
    Iso-scalar scalar meson-nucleon coupling fitted to nuclear saturation properties
  • g_a0NN
    Iso-vector scalar meson-nucleon coupling
  • σ_πN
    Pion-nucleon sigma term set negative to stiffen the EOS and satisfy astrophysical constraints
  • four-vector meson couplings
    Vector meson couplings adjusted for nuclear matter properties
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking generates baryon and meson masses
    Invoked in the abstract as the mechanism for mass generation in the linear sigma model
  • domain assumption Mean-field approximation is sufficient for nuclear matter and neutron-star calculations
    Explicitly stated as the calculational framework
invented entities (1)
  • constant background field ξ no independent evidence
    purpose: Encodes explicit chiral symmetry breaking and is related to current quark mass
    Introduced to allow σ_πN to take a negative value at finite density

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5549 in / 1700 out tokens · 43223 ms · 2026-05-15T17:14:44.940643+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 21 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral

    Abbott, B.P., et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), 2017. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161106. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161106, arXiv:1710.05832

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161106 2017

  2. [2]

    GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs

    Abbott, B.P., et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), 2019. GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040, arXiv:1811.12907

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031040 2019

  3. [3]

    (PREX), 2021

    Adhikari, D., et al. (PREX), 2021. Accurate Determination of the Neutron Skin Thickness of 208Pb through Parity-Violating Electron Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 172502. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.172502, arXiv:2104.03201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.172502 2021

  4. [4]

    From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review

    Baym, G., Hatsuda, T., Kojo, T., Powell, P.D., Song, Y., Takatsuka, T., 2018. From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review. Rept. Prog. Phys. 81, 056902. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaae14, arXiv:1707.04966

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaae14 2018

  5. [5]

    Chiral Dynamics in Nucleons and Nuclei

    Bernard, V., Kaiser, N., Meissner, U.G., 1995. Chiral perturbation theory in nucleon physics. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 4, 193–346. doi:10.1016/0146-6410(95)00040-0, arXiv:hep-ph/9501384

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0146-6410(95)00040-0 1995

  6. [6]

    Symmetry energy and its impact on nuclear physics and astrophysics

    Chen, L.W., 2017. Symmetry energy and its impact on nuclear physics and astrophysics. Nucl. Phys. Rev. 34, 20. doi:10.13538/j.1001-8042/hpnpq.2017.02.001

    work page doi:10.13538/j.1001-8042/hpnpq.2017.02.001 2017

  7. [7]

    Isospin-dependent properties of asymmetric nuclear matter in relativistic mean-field models

    Chen, L.W., Ko, C.M., Li, B.A., 2007. Isospin-dependent properties of asymmetric nuclear matter in relativistic mean field models. Phys. Rev. C 76, 054316. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.054316, arXiv:0709.0900

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.76.054316 2007

  8. [8]

    (NANOGrav), 2019

    Cromartie, H.T., et al. (NANOGrav), 2019. Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar. Nature Astron. 4, 72–76. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0880-2, arXiv:1904.06759

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0880-2 2019

  9. [9]

    Current Status of the Relativistic Two-Nucleon One-Boson-Exchange Potential

    Erkelenz, K., 1974. Current Status of the Relativistic Two-Nucleon One-Boson-Exchange Potential. Phys. Rept. 13, 191–258. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(74)90013-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(74)90013-1 1974

  10. [10]

    Toy model for two chiral nonets

    Fariborz, A.H., Jora, R., Schechter, J., 2005. Toy model for two chiral nonets. Phys. Rev. D 72, 034001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.034001, arXiv:hep-ph/0506170

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.034001 2005

  11. [11]

    Two chiral nonet model with massless quarks

    Fariborz, A.H., Jora, R., Schechter, J., 2008. Two chiral nonets with a large gluon component. Phys. Rev. D 77, 034006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.034006, arXiv:0707.0843

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.034006 2008

  12. [12]

    Type II seesaw mechanism for Higgs doublets and the scale of new physics

    Fariborz, A.H., Jora, R., Schechter, J., 2009. Global aspects of the scalar meson puzzle. Phys. Rev. D 79, 074014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.074014, arXiv:0902.2325

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.074014 2009

  13. [13]

    The phase diagram of dense QCD

    Fukushima, K., Hatsuda, T., 2011. The phase diagram of dense QCD. Rept. Prog. Phys. 74, 014001. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/74/1/014001, arXiv:1005.4814

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0034-4885/74/1/014001 2011

  14. [14]

    Impact of the symmetry energy slope on the properties of neutron stars with the Korean-Skyrme model

    Gil, H., Hyun, C.H., Papakonstantinou, P., 2019. Impact of the symmetry energy slope on the properties of neutron stars with the Korean-Skyrme model. Phys. Lett. B 797, 134866. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134866, arXiv:1811.08588

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134866 2019

  15. [15]

    Lattice QCD Calculations of Hadron Structure: Constituent Quarks and Chiral Symmetry

    Hofmann, F., Keil, C., Lenske, H., 2001. Density dependent hadron field theory for many body systems. Phys. Rev. C 64, 034314. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.64.034314, arXiv:nucl-th/0007058. 5

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.64.034314 2001

  16. [16]

    Momentum Space OBEP, Calculation ofπNNandρNN Coupling Constants from Nucleon-Nucleon Phase Shifts

    Holinde, K., Machleidt, R., 1976. Momentum Space OBEP, Calculation ofπNNandρNN Coupling Constants from Nucleon-Nucleon Phase Shifts. Nucl. Phys. A 256, 479–496. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(76)90554-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(76)90554-7 1976

  17. [17]

    Constraining the nuclear symmetry energy from terrestrial experiments and astrophysical observations arXiv:2501.05832

    Kong, H.Y., Chen, L.W., 2025. Constraining the nuclear symmetry energy from terrestrial experiments and astrophysical observations arXiv:2501.05832. preprint/Recent Publication

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Nuclear Matter in Relativistic Mean Field Theory with Isovector Scalar Meson

    Kubis, S., Kutschera, M., 1997. Nuclear matter properties with the realistic nucleon-nucleon interaction. Phys. Lett. B 399, 191–195. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00344-7, arXiv:astro-ph/9703049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(97)00344-7 1997

  19. [19]

    The Equation of State of Hot, Dense Matter and Neutron Stars

    Lattimer, J.M., Prakash, M., 2016. The Equation of State of Hot, Dense Matter and Neutron Stars. Phys. Rept. 621, 127–164. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.02.003, arXiv:1512.07820

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.02.003 2016

  20. [20]

    Manifestation of hidden scale symmetry in condensed baryonic matter

    Lee, W.G., Paeng, W.G., Ma, Y.L., Rho, M., 2022. Manifestation of hidden scale symmetry in condensed baryonic matter. Phys. Rev. D 105, 014011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.014011, arXiv:2110.15049

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.014011 2022

  21. [21]

    Towards Understanding Hierarchical Structures of Quark-Lepton Matter and Neutron Stars in the Multimessenger Era

    Li, B.A., Krastev, P.G., Wen, D.H., Zhang, N.B., 2019. Towards Understanding Hierarchical Structures of Quark-Lepton Matter and Neutron Stars in the Multimessenger Era. EPJ Web Conf. 210, 03003. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921003003, arXiv:1905.13175

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921003003 2019

  22. [22]

    Astrophysical Constraints on Nuclear Symmetry Energy with the FSUDelta Model

    Li, F., Cai, B.J., Zhou, Y., Jiang, W.Z., Chen, L.W., 2022. Astrophysical Constraints on Nuclear Symmetry Energy with the FSUDelta Model. Astrophys. J. 929,

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5e2a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5e2a

  24. [24]

    Asymmetric nuclear matter:the role of the isovector scalar channel

    Liu, B., Greco, V., Baran, V., Colonna, M., Di Toro, M., 2002. Asymmetric nuclear matter: the role of the isovector scalar channel. Phys. Rev. C 65, 045201. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.65.045201, arXiv:nucl-th/0112034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.65.045201 2002

  25. [25]

    Quark structure of isoscalar- and isovector-scalar mesons and nuclear matter property

    Ma, Y., Ma, Y.L., 2024. Quark structure of isoscalar- and isovector-scalar mesons and nuclear matter property. Phys. Rev. D 109, 074022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.074022, arXiv:2311.07899

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.074022 2024

  26. [26]

    Composition of scalar mesons and their effects on nuclear matter properties in an extended linear sigma model

    Ma, Y., Ma, Y.L., 2025. Composition of scalar mesons and their effects on nuclear matter properties in an extended linear sigma model. Phys. Rev. D 112, 054026. doi:10.1103/p4xz-4ggf, arXiv:2507.10049

    work page doi:10.1103/p4xz-4ggf 2025

  27. [27]

    Compact star and compact star matter properties from a baryonic extended linear sigma model with explicit chiral symmetry breaking arXiv:2512.23477

    Ma, Y., Ma, Y.L., Zhang, L.Q., 2025. Compact star and compact star matter properties from a baryonic extended linear sigma model with explicit chiral symmetry breaking arXiv:2512.23477

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    TextMountain: Accurate Scene Text Detection via Instance Segmentation

    Ma, Y.L., Rho, M., 2018a. Hidden Local Symmetry and Infinite Tower of Vector Mesons for Dense Baryonic Matter. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 27, 1830012. doi:10.1142/S021830131830012X, arXiv:1811.12786

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s021830131830012x

  29. [29]

    Towards a unified Theory of Compact Stars: the Meson-Skyrmion Duality

    Ma, Y.L., Rho, M., 2018b. Towards a unified Theory of Compact Stars: the Meson-Skyrmion Duality. Contemp. Phys. 59, 231–252. doi:10.1080/00107514.2018.1481235, arXiv:1804.01899

    work page doi:10.1080/00107514.2018.1481235 2018

  30. [30]

    Towards a Manifestation of the Scale Anomaly Hidden in Polarized Matter

    Ma, Y.L., Rho, M., 2020. Towards a Manifestation of the Scale Anomaly Hidden in Polarized Matter. Phys. Rev. D 101, 034023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.034023, arXiv:1909.05115. 6

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.034023 2020

  31. [31]

    Pseudoconformal structure in dense baryonic matter

    Ma, Y.L., Rho, M., 2022. Pseudoconformal structure in dense baryonic matter. Phys. Rev. D 106, 014015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014015, arXiv:2112.01185

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.014015 2022

  32. [32]

    The Meson theory of nuclear forces and nuclear structure

    Machleidt, R., 1989. The Meson theory of nuclear forces and nuclear structure. Adv. Nucl. Phys. 19, 189–376. doi:10.1016/0065-2741(89)90002-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0065-2741(89)90002-9 1989

  33. [33]

    QCD Collisional Energy Loss in an Increasingly Interacting Quark Gluon Plasma

    Meissner, U.G., 2005. The Chiral quark model: then and now. AIP Conf. Proc. 792, 114–123. doi:10.1063/1.2062947, arXiv:hep-ph/0506241

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.2062947 2005

  34. [34]

    The Effects ofΛ-Hyperons on the Properties of Neutron Stars and Quark Stars

    Miyatsu, T., Myrzakul, S., Cheoun, M.K., 2022. The Effects ofΛ-Hyperons on the Properties of Neutron Stars and Quark Stars. Universe 8, 141. doi:10.3390/universe8030141, arXiv:2202.04253

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8030141 2022

  35. [35]

    A Low-Energy Nucleon-Nucleon Potential from Regge Pole Theory

    Nagels, M.M., Rijken, T.A., de Swart, J.J., 1978. A Low-Energy Nucleon-Nucleon Potential from Regge Pole Theory. Phys. Rev. D 17, 768. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.17.768

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.17.768 1978

  36. [36]

    Navas et al

    Navas, S., et al. (Particle Data Group), 2024. Review of Particle Physics. Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  37. [37]

    Thermodynamics of Intersecting Black Branes from Interacting Elementary Branes

    Olbrich, L., Zetenyi, M., Lutz, M.F.M., 2015. Scattering of photons off the nucleon in a chiral effective field theory. Phys. Rev. D 92, 094021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.094021, arXiv:1507.03507

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.094021 2015

  38. [38]

    On Massive neutron cores

    Oppenheimer, J.R., Volkoff, G.M., 1939. On Massive neutron cores. Phys. Rev. 55, 374–381. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.374

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.55.374 1939

  39. [39]

    Scale-Invariant Hidden Local Symmetry, Topology Change and Dense Baryonic Matter II

    Paeng, W.G., Kuo, T.T.S., Lazzari, M., Rho, M., 2017. Parameter-free effective field theory for solar radioastronomy to extreme dense matter in compact stars. Phys. Rev. D 96, 014031. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.014031, arXiv:1704.02775

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.014031 2017

  40. [40]

    Implications of PREX-II on the equation of state of Neutron-Rich matter

    Reed, B.T., Fattoyev, F.J., Horowitz, C.J., Piekarewicz, J., 2021. Implications of PREX-II on the equation of state of Neutron-Rich matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 172503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.172503, arXiv:2104.05859

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.172503 2021

  41. [41]

    Neutron skin of 208Pb, nuclear symmetry energy, and the parity radius experiment

    Roca-Maza, X., Centelles, M., Viñas, X., Warda, M., 2011. Neutron skin thickness in 208Pb: a sensitive observable for the nuclear matter symmetry energy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 252501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.252501, arXiv:1103.1762

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.252501 2011

  42. [42]

    Multimessenger constraints on the properties of symmetric nuclear matter and the neutron-rich matter equation of state

    Sedrakian, A., Li, B.A., Li, J.J., 2023. Multimessenger constraints on the properties of symmetric nuclear matter and the neutron-rich matter equation of state. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 131, 104041. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104041, arXiv:2212.11026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104041 2023

  43. [43]

    The Relativistic Nuclear Many Body Problem

    Serot, B.D., Walecka, J.D., 1986. The Relativistic Nuclear Many Body Problem. Adv. Nucl. Phys. 16, 1–327. doi:10.1016/S0065-2741(08)60144-1

    work page doi:10.1016/s0065-2741(08)60144-1 1986

  44. [44]

    Recent Progress in Quantum Hadrodynamics

    Serot, B.D., Walecka, J.D., 1997. Recent progress in quantum hadrodynamics. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 6, 515–631. doi:10.1142/S021830139700018X, arXiv:nucl-th/9701058

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s021830139700018x 1997

  45. [45]

    Dense nuclear matter equation of state from heavy-ion collisions

    Sorensen, A., et al., 2024. Dense nuclear matter equation of state from heavy-ion collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 134, 104080. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104080, arXiv:2301.13253

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104080 2024

  46. [46]

    Relativistic mean field theory for unstable nuclei with non-linear sigma and omega terms

    Sugahara, Y., Toki, H., 1994. Relativistic mean field theory for unstable nuclei with non-linear sigma and omega terms. Nucl. Phys. A 579, 557–572. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(94)90923-7. 7

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(94)90923-7 1994

  47. [47]

    Static solutions of Einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid

    Tolman, R.C., 1939. Static solutions of Einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid. Phys. Rev. 55, 364–373. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.364

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.55.364 1939

  48. [48]

    Symmetry energy in the relativistic mean-field model with density-dependent couplings

    Typel, S., 2020. Symmetry energy in the relativistic mean-field model with density-dependent couplings. Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 283. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00271-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00271-x 2020

  49. [49]

    A Theory of highly condensed matter

    Walecka, J.D., 1974. A Theory of highly condensed matter. Annals Phys. 83, 491–529. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(74)90208-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(74)90208-5 1974

  50. [50]

    A class group heuristic based on the distribution of 1-eigenspaces in matrix groups

    Wang, N., Liu, M., Jiang, H., Zhang, F.S., 2014. Towards a general description of nuclear mass with the Weizsäcker-Skyrme formula. Phys. Rev. C 90, 014303. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.014303, arXiv:1404.2447

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.90.014303 2014

  51. [51]

    Training Multi-Task Adversarial Network for Extracting Noise-Robust Speaker Embedding

    Zabari, N., Kubis, S., Wójcik, W., 2019. Nuclear symmetry energy with the delta meson in the relativistic mean-field model. Phys. Rev. C 99, 035209. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.035209, arXiv:1811.09355. 8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.035209 2019