Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 11 references

Explicit p-adic Hodge theory for elliptic curves and non-split Cartan images

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read For p > 7, a non-CM elliptic curve whose mod p image lies in the normaliser of a non-split Cartan subgroup has p-adic image equal to the full preimage of the mod p^n normaliser for some n ≥ 1.

desk verdict Completes the p-adic image classification in the non-split Cartan case and supplies a genuinely useful computational handle, but the whole local tower rests on Volkov's unpublished thesis. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.04021 v2 pith:T3RFGANN submitted 2026-03-04 math.NT

classification math.NT MSC 11G0511G0711F8014G2011S20
keywords ellipticcurvesGaloisrepresentationsnon-splitCartansubgroupsp-adicHodgetheorysupersingularreductionformallogarithmsdivisionpolynomialsadicimages
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that in the non-split Cartan case the p-adic Galois representation of an elliptic curve is completely pinned down by a single integer. Concretely, for a non-CM elliptic curve over Q with p > 7 and mod p image inside the normaliser of a non-split Cartan subgroup, the full p-adic image is the preimage of the corresponding mod p^n normaliser for some n ≥ 1, ruling out an exceptional level-p^2 group. Locally over Q_p, this follows from a new explicit p-adic Hodge theory: each curve is encoded by one deformation parameter α, and the paper builds explicit polynomials whose roots are Galois-equivariantly identified with the p-power torsion. A further new result computes α to any p-adic precision from the formal logarithm of a Weierstrass model, equivalently from the j-invariant; this yields the value of n and strong bounds on the adelic image index in terms of the height of j. The authors note that the local condition p > sqrt(n0+1) is believed removable.

What carries the argument

The deformation parameter α ∈ P^1(Q_p) of the filtered (φ, Gal(K/Q_p))-module D_α (Theorem 3.3), together with the explicit polynomials g_k(x) = x^{p^{2k}} + Σ_{n=1}^k (-1)^n p^n (x^{p^{2k-2n}} + α^{-1} π_e^2 x^{p^{2k+1-2n}}), whose roots are Galois-equivariantly identified with E[p^k]. The valuation v(α^{-1}) is the switch: Cartan containment for k <= v(α^{-1})+1, maximal growth for k = v(α^{-1})+2, forcing the full p-adic image to be an inverse image. The bridge to arithmetic is β = lim -(p/π_e) d_{p^{2k+1}}/d_{p^{2k}}, with v(β) = v(j)/3 - 1/e (or v(j-1728)/2 - 1/e), giving α from Weierstrass data.

What would settle it

Compute the 11-adic Galois image of E_1/Q_11 : y^2 = x^3 + 11^3 x + 11^2 (Example 8.31). Theorem 9.1 predicts Im ρ_{E_1,11^∞} = π_1^{-1}(G_1) with G_1 an index-3 subgroup of C^+_ns(11); in particular the mod 121 image lies in the preimage of C^+_ns(11). If a direct computation (e.g., via division polynomials) finds a mod 121 element congruent to Id + 11M with M not in V_1 ⊕ V_2, the theorem fails. More broadly, any Q-rational point on the modular curve X^#_{ns}(11^2) would give a non-CM E/Q with level-11^2 image G^#_{ns}(11^2), contradicting Theorem 9.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim: an elliptic curve over Q_p whose mod p image lies in the normaliser of a non-split Cartan subgroup C^+_ns(p) has p-adic Galois image governed by one number, the valuation of a deformation parameter α. The rational Tate module is V_α (Theorem 3.3), and the p^k-torsion is identified with roots of explicit polynomials g_k; v(α^{-1}) is a sharp threshold: Cartan containment for k <= v(α^{-1})+1, maximal growth at k = v(α^{-1})+2. So the full p-adic image is the preimage of its level n = v(α^{-1})+1 image, and α is computable from j via formal logarithms (n0 = floor(v(j)/3), resp. floor(v(j-1728)/2); index 1 or 3). Globally, for non-CM E/Q and p > 7, Im ρ_{E,p^∞} = π_n^{-1}(C^+

Load-bearing premise

The entire chain relies on the classification theorem (Theorem 3.3), cited from a PhD thesis and not reproved, that every E/Q_p with semistability defect e in {3,4,6} and potentially supersingular reduction has V_p E ≅ V_α; a gap there would invalidate the polynomials g_k, the computation of α, and the image classification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For non-CM E/Q, p > 7, if the mod p image is in C^+_ns(p), then Im ρ_{E,p^∞} = π_n^{-1}(C^+_ns(p^n)) for some n ≥ 1; the exceptional level-p^2 group G^#_{ns}(p^2) is ruled out (Theorem 9.1).
  • The integer n is explicit: n = floor(v(j)/3) for e in {3,6} or floor(v(j-1728)/2) for e = 4, with the p-adic image contained in C^+_ns(p^n) with index 1 or 3; the index-3 case occurs exactly for e in {3,6}, p ≡ 2,5 mod 9, realized by curves y^2 = x^3 + p^i (Corollary 8.29, Remark 8.30).
  • The adelic image index satisfies [GL_2(Ẑ) : Im ρ_E] < 1.6·10^{17}(h(j(E))+480)^{3.11} and is asymptotically < h(j(E))^{2+O(1/log log h)} (Theorem 9.3).
  • The polynomials g_k give a new recursive description of E[p^k] with linear dependence on α^{-1}, usable also for semistability defect e = 1, 2 (Theorem 4.2, Remark 4.24); they may serve as alternative division polynomials.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Read as a rigidity statement, the result says the p-adic tower of a supersingular elliptic curve is as CM-like as possible up to a level n0 set by the j-invariant, then grows at the maximal rate; this suggests a stratification of the supersingular locus by v(α^{-1}) that could be studied in families.
  • The explicit threshold may allow local-constancy results for the p-adic Galois image on Weierstrass coefficient space — determining the precise p-adic radius where the mod p^{n0} representation is constant — which the paper hints at via Krasner's lemma; this would give a fully algorithmic 'image from a model' routine.
  • The same formal-logarithm machinery should extend to semistability defect 1 and 2, and likely to other p-divisible groups, making the computation of filtered φ-modules for potentially crystalline representations of GL_2-type fully explicit.
  • The paper flags a published formula for β that is not invariant under strict isomorphisms and provides a corrected computation; this illustrates that formal-logarithm invariants require careful normalisation, which the algorithm's precision bounds make explicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the p-adic Galois images of elliptic curves over Q_p whose mod p image is contained in the normaliser of a non-split Cartan subgroup. Building on Volkov's classification of filtered (φ, Gal(K/Q_p))-modules, the authors introduce explicit polynomials g_k whose roots are in Galois-equivariant bijection with E[p^k], establish a local dichotomy in terms of a deformation parameter α, and give an algorithm to compute α from a Weierstrass model via formal logarithms. These local results are then used to prove a global theorem (Theorem 9.1) asserting that, for a non-CM elliptic curve E/Q and p > 7 with Im ρ_{E,p} ⊆ C_ns^+(p), the full p-adic image is the preimage of C_ns^+(p^n) for some n ≥ 1. The paper also derives improved bounds on the adelic image index in terms of the height of j(E).

Significance. If the main results are correct, the paper closes a notable gap in the p-adic classification of Galois images of elliptic curves in the non-split Cartan case, a problem that had previously resisted treatment. The local classification (Theorem 5.1) and the explicit connection between the formal logarithm and the filtered (φ,G)-module parameter α are novel and likely to be useful beyond this paper. The paper is carefully written and contains a substantial amount of original technical work, including the construction and analysis of the polynomials g_k and the scalar computations in Section 8. However, the unconditional validity of the main theorems rests on a theorem (Theorem 3.3) quoted verbatim from Volkov's unpublished PhD thesis, which is not proved in the manuscript. This external dependency is load-bearing and tempers confidence in the absolute conclusions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 3, Theorem 3.3] Theorem 3.3, stated as a quotation from Volkov's PhD thesis [Vol98, p. 25 and p. 125], is the foundation on which the rest of the paper is built. It asserts that every elliptic curve over Q_p with semistability defect e∈{3,4,6} and potentially supersingular reduction gives rise to a filtered (φ, Gal(K/Q_p))-module D_α, and conversely, and that the rational Tate module is recovered as V_α. This classification supplies the deformation parameter α, the identification of V_α with the rational Tate module, and (via Lemma 2.18 and the related description of E[p]) the irreducibility and lattice-uniqueness steps used later. Theorem 4.2, Theorem 5.4, Theorem 5.1, and ultimately Theorem 9.1 all depend on Theorem 3.3. The manuscript explicitly says 'We will largely omit proofs; all the details can be found in [Vol98].' Given that [Vol98] is an unpublished dissertation and no independent verificatio
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 1.3 and abstract] The formula for n0 is written as n0 := (1/3 v(j)) (resp. (1/2 v(j−1728))) without the floor function. Since n0 is supposed to be a positive integer, the floor brackets should appear as they do in Corollary 8.29 (e.g., ⌊1/3 v(j)⌋).
  2. [Remark 8.22] The claim that [Kaw11, Proposition 2.2.1] is incorrect is made in a remark. This is a strong assertion about another published paper and should be substantiated with a concrete counterexample or a more detailed explanation of the flaw, especially since the reader cannot easily check the internal details without Kawachi's paper.
  3. [References] [Vol98] is a PhD thesis. It would be helpful to include a URL or repository where the thesis can be accessed, to facilitate verification of the quoted results.
  4. [Introduction] The phrase 'which appears to be novel' in the abstract and introduction is informal. It can be replaced by a clearer statement, e.g., 'to our knowledge this is the first explicit algorithm...'.
  5. [Section 2.4] In Lemma 2.20, the proof for the case j=0 or 1728 refers to [Vol01, Proposition 2.7] and [Vol98, §B.2.2]. These references are appropriate, but the text could mention that the relevant statements also cover the uniqueness of the Tate module in the supersingular good-reduction case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the p-adic image theorem is derived from independent p-adic Hodge theory inputs and external classifications, not from its own conclusion.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is not circular. The deformation parameter α is introduced through Volkov's classification (Theorem 3.3), which is an external result from [Vol98] and does not assume the non-split Cartan image conclusion. The paper then computes v(α) from the j-invariant and Weierstrass coefficients via formal logarithms in Section 8, which is independent of the Galois image statement. Theorem 5.4 translates v(α) into a prediction about Im ρ_{E,p^k} using the auxiliary polynomials g_k derived from Equation (3.3); the exclusion of the exceptional case G^#_ns(p^2) in Theorem 5.1 follows from the dichotomy v(α^{-1}) = 0 versus v(α^{-1}) ≥ 1, not from assuming the target result. Self-citations to [Fur26] and [FL23] are prior independent classifications that do not contain Theorem 9.1; in fact [Fur26] leaves open the exact case that this paper rules out. The only notable dependency is Volkov's Theorem 3.3, which the paper explicitly does not prove ('We will largely omit proofs; all the details can be found in [Vol98]'); this is an external correctness/verification risk, not circularity. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no definition presupposes the theorem being proved.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on Volkov's classification of potentially supersingular elliptic curves via filtered (φ, Gal(K/Q_p))-modules D_α (Theorem 3.3) and on prior modular curve work; no new ad hoc free parameters are introduced. The paper's own original contribution is the explicit computation of α from Weierstrass models.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Volkov's classification theorem (Theorem 3.3): every E/Q_p with semistability defect e∈{3,4,6} and potentially supersingular reduction has V_pE ≅ V_α for some α∈P^1(Q_p), and conversely; V_α = Hom_{φ,G_K}(D_α, BW(R)).
    The paper reviews this from [Vol98, p.125] without proof; all later results depend on it.
  • domain assumption The description of V_α as roots of Equation (3.3) and the identification of E[p^k] with A_c/p^k A_c (Lemmas 3.7, 4.11) depend on the filtered-module functor D_cris,K/Q_p of Fontaine/Volkov.
    Cited to [Vol98] and [Fon94]; not reproved in this paper.
  • domain assumption Group-theoretic classification of non-split N-Cartan lifts (Theorem 2.14) from [Fur26, Theorem 3.14].
    Used to organize possible p-adic images; no proof given in this paper.
  • domain assumption The no-canonical-subgroup results of [Smi23, Theorem 4.6] and [FL23, Theorem 3.10] hold over p-adic fields as claimed in Theorem 2.9.
    The paper states the proofs hold for p-adic fields without showing details.
  • domain assumption Kawachi's Dieudonné module / formal logarithm isomorphism (Theorem 8.17) and Lemma 8.8 (Yasuda's explicit formal logarithm formula).
    Used to compute β from formal logarithm coefficients; cited to [Kaw11, Lemma 2.2.3] and [Yas13].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Explicit p-adic Hodge theory for elliptic curves and non-split Cartan images." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T3RFGANN

@misc{pith2026260304021,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Explicit p-adic Hodge theory for elliptic curves and non-split Cartan images},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T3RFGANN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.04021}
}
abstract

Let $E/\mathbb{Q}_p$ be an elliptic curve whose mod $p$ Galois image is contained in the normaliser of a non-split Cartan. We classify the possible $p$-adic images of $E$ using tools from $p$-adic Hodge theory via a careful analysis of the local Galois structure of the $p$-power torsion of $E$. We pay special attention to the case where $E$ has potentially supersingular reduction, where we give an algorithm to determine the corresponding filtered $(\varphi,\operatorname{Gal}(K/\mathbb{Q}_p))$-module from a Weierstrass model (which appears to be novel), and introduce alternative division polynomials that may be of independent interest. We deduce global consequences for elliptic curves $E/\mathbb{Q}$: when the mod $p$ representation of $E$ has non-split Cartan image and $E$ doesn't have CM, the $p$-adic image must be the full preimage of the normaliser of a mod $p^n$ non-split Cartan for some $n \geq 1$. As an application, we sharpen existing bounds on the adelic image in terms of the Weil height of the $j$-invariant.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

11 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Balakrishnan, L

    [BBH+25] Jennifer S. Balakrishnan, L. Alexander Betts, Daniel Rayor Hast, Aashraya Jha, and Jan Steffen M¨ uller. Rational points on the non-split Cartan modular curve of level 27 and quadratic Chabauty over number fields. Preprint arXiv:2501.07833,

  2. [7]

    p-adic distribution of CM points and Hecke orbits

    [HMRL21] Sebasti´ an Herrero, Ricardo Menares, and Juan Rivera-Letelier. p-adic distribution of CM points and Hecke orbits. II: Linnik equidistribution on the supersingular locus. Preprint arXiv:2102.04865,

  3. [9]

    [Zyw11] David Zywina

    Cohomologies p-adiques et applications arithm´ etiques, I. [Zyw11] David Zywina. Bounds for Serre’s open image theorem. Preprint arXiv:1102.4656,

  4. [1994]

    [Fur26] Lorenzo Furio

    With an appendix by Pierre Colmez, P´ eriodesp-adiques (Bures-sur-Yvette, 1988). [Fur26] Lorenzo Furio. Effective bounds for adelic Galois representations attached to elliptic curves over the rationals. Preprint arXiv:2412.10340v3,

  5. [1998]

    [Sil09] Joseph H

    With the collaboration of Willem Kuyk and John Labute, Revised reprint of the 1968 original. [Sil09] Joseph H. Silverman. The arithmetic of elliptic curves , volume 106 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer, Dordrecht, second edition,

  6. [2002]

    Serre’s uniformity question and proper subgroups of C+ ns(p)

    [FL23] Lorenzo Furio and Davide Lombardo. Serre’s uniformity question and proper subgroups of C+ ns(p). Preprint arXiv:2305.17780,

  7. [2011]

    On the possible images of the mod ℓ representations associated to elliptic curves over Q

    [Zyw15a] David Zywina. On the possible images of the mod ℓ representations associated to elliptic curves over Q. Preprint arXiv:1508.07660,

  8. [2013]

    Integral p-adic Hodge theory

    [Bre02] Christophe Breuil. Integral p-adic Hodge theory. In Algebraic geometry 2000, Azumino (Hotaka) , volume 36 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math. , pages 51–80. Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo,

Show all 11 references
  1. [2015]

    Possible indices for the Galois image of elliptic curves over Q

    [Zyw15b] David Zywina. Possible indices for the Galois image of elliptic curves over Q. Preprint arXiv:1508.07663,

  2. [2023]

    On 7-adic Galois representations for elliptic curves over Q

    EXPLICIT p-ADIC HODGE THEORY FOR ELLIPTIC CUR VES AND NON-SPLIT CARTAN IMAGES 41 [FL25] Lorenzo Furio and Davide Lombardo. On 7-adic Galois representations for elliptic curves over Q. Preprint arXiv:2507.17967,

  3. [2026]

    Small height and infinite nonabelian extensions

    [Hab13] Philipp Habegger. Small height and infinite nonabelian extensions. Duke Math. J. , 162(11):2027–2076,

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.