pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.04294 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Ab initio study of saddle-point excitons in monolayer SnS2

Vinicius Alves Bastos , Fulvio Paleari , Eleonora Luppi , Marco Gibertini , Alice Ruini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 16:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords monolayer SnS2saddle-point excitonsGW-BSElinear polarizationM pointvalleytronics2D photocatalystoptical absorption
0
0 comments X

The pith

Linearly polarized light lifts C3 symmetry among the three M points in monolayer SnS2, creating three independent excitonic states

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the lowest-energy bound excitons in monolayer SnS2 form at saddle points in the valence bands at the M points of the Brillouin zone, where the conduction bands are also anisotropic. It uses GW and Bethe-Salpeter equation calculations to show that the C3 rotational symmetry relating the three inequivalent M points is lifted by linearly polarized light, producing three excitonic states with distinct transition dipole moments. This polarization-selective coupling matters because SnS2 is a visible-light photocatalyst whose optical response is expected to be dominated by excitons due to its two-dimensional nature. A reader would care about the resulting ability to address specific excitonic states selectively with light polarization.

Core claim

Using the GW approximation and the Bethe-Salpeter equation, the lowest single-particle transitions occur at the M point with a saddle-point topology in the valence bands. Resolving the exciton dipole moments in momentum space for different linear polarizations demonstrates that the light lifts the C3 rotational symmetry connecting the three inequivalent M points and generates three linearly independent excitonic states.

What carries the argument

The polarization-selective coupling of linearly polarized light to the three inequivalent M-point saddle-point excitons that lifts their C3 rotational symmetry

If this is right

  • The three M-point excitons become addressable by choosing the direction of linear polarization.
  • Anisotropy in the conduction bands at M shapes the excitonic wavefunctions and their dipole orientations.
  • Polarization control provides a concrete route to state encoding schemes in valleytronics devices.
  • Visible-range absorption in this photocatalyst becomes tunable by light polarization without changing photon energy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetry-lifting mechanism could appear in other 2D hexagonal materials whose lowest gap sits at M-point saddle points.
  • Polarization-dependent photocurrent or photoluminescence measurements could directly test the predicted independence of the three states in fabricated devices.
  • If phonon coupling is weak, the effect should survive at room temperature; temperature-dependent spectra would check this.

Load-bearing premise

GW plus Bethe-Salpeter equation calculations without higher-order vertex corrections or phonon-assisted mixing accurately capture the bound excitons as independent under linear polarization.

What would settle it

An optical absorption measurement on monolayer SnS2 under linearly polarized light rotated through 120-degree increments that shows a single unchanging peak for the lowest exciton instead of three distinct intensity or energy patterns would refute the independence of the states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.04294 by Alice Ruini, Eleonora Luppi, Fulvio Paleari, Marco Gibertini, Vinicius Alves Bastos.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Top and side views of the T-phase monolayer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Band structure of T-phase monolayer SnS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. BSE optical absorption spectrum of monolayer SnS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. GW@DFT-PBE band structure of T-phase mono [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Single-particle contributions to the excitons in Figure 4: projected on the DFT band dispersion plot ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. In (a)-(c), norm-squared of the k-resolved BSE dipoles as a function of light-polarization direction for the first bright [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Monolayer SnS2 has emerged as a promising visible-light photocatalyst for photoelectrochemical applications, owing to its strong optical absorption in the visible range and excellent chemical stability. Despite its reduced dimensionality - where excitonic effects are expected to be pronounced - comprehensive theoretical investigations of bound excitons in this material remain scarce. Notably, unlike most two-dimensional hexagonal crystals, monolayer SnS2 exhibits its lowest single-particle transition at the M point of the Brillouin zone (BZ). Here, the electronic valence bands form a saddle point while conduction states display a minimum with pronounced anisotropy, creating a distinctive band topology whose impact on optical excitations has not yet been systematically explored. In this work, we present a first-principles study of bound excitons in monolayer SnS2 based on state-of-the-art many-body perturbation theory, employing the GW approximation and the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE). We analyze how band symmetry and anisotropy shape the excitonic wavefunctions and transition dipole moments. By resolving the exciton dipoles in momentum space for different linear light polarizations, we demonstrate that linearly polarized light lifts the C3 rotational symmetry relating the three inequivalent M points, giving rise to three linearly independent excitonic states. This polarization-selective coupling, previously identified for saddle points in graphene, is achieved in SnS2 for bound excitons and provides a potential route toward state encoding schemes in valleytronics applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a GW+BSE first-principles study of bound excitons in monolayer SnS2, where the lowest single-particle transitions occur at the M-point saddle points with anisotropic conduction bands. The central claim is that linearly polarized light lifts the C3 rotational symmetry among the three inequivalent M points, producing three linearly independent excitonic states whose transition dipoles are selectively coupled to individual valleys.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work provides a concrete, parameter-free demonstration of polarization-selective valley addressing for bound excitons in a 2D material with saddle-point topology, extending prior graphene results to excitonic states relevant for valleytronics. The ab initio methodology with no fitted parameters in the exciton binding or dipoles is a clear strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [BSE results / excitonic wavefunctions] Section on BSE kernel and excitonic eigenstates (results subsection discussing momentum-resolved dipoles): the manuscript shows polarization selectivity via transition dipoles but does not report or bound the off-diagonal intervalley matrix elements of the direct and exchange kernels between states localized at inequivalent M points. On a discrete full-BZ k-grid these elements are in principle nonzero; if they hybridize the three M-point excitons, the claimed linear independence under linear polarization would not hold. Explicit values (or an upper bound) for these couplings in the bound-state subspace are required.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the polarization-selective coupling 'provides a potential route toward state encoding schemes' but does not outline a concrete readout or manipulation protocol; a brief sentence on experimental implications would improve clarity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the exciton wavefunction plots should explicitly label which M-point contribution dominates for each polarization direction to aid the reader.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comment, which helps clarify the robustness of our central claim. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested information.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Section on BSE kernel and excitonic eigenstates (results subsection discussing momentum-resolved dipoles): the manuscript shows polarization selectivity via transition dipoles but does not report or bound the off-diagonal intervalley matrix elements of the direct and exchange kernels between states localized at inequivalent M points. On a discrete full-BZ k-grid these elements are in principle nonzero; if they hybridize the three M-point excitons, the claimed linear independence under linear polarization would not hold. Explicit values (or an upper bound) for these couplings in the bound-state subspace are required.

    Authors: We agree that explicitly addressing the off-diagonal intervalley couplings is necessary to fully substantiate the linear independence of the three excitonic states. Our GW+BSE calculations are performed by diagonalizing the full Hamiltonian on a dense, symmetry-unfolded k-grid that includes all possible direct and exchange kernel matrix elements. In the revised manuscript we will report the magnitudes of the off-diagonal elements connecting the bound excitonic eigenstates localized at the three inequivalent M points. We will also provide a brief analysis showing that these couplings remain small compared with the polarization-induced energy splittings and the exciton binding energy, thereby confirming that hybridization does not invalidate the claimed linear independence under linearly polarized light. The new data will be added to the subsection on excitonic eigenstates and momentum-resolved dipoles. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: first-principles GW+BSE derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper performs a standard ab initio GW+BSE calculation on monolayer SnS2. The central result—that linearly polarized light lifts C3 symmetry among the three M-point excitons, producing three independent states—is obtained directly from the computed single-particle bands, the BSE Hamiltonian on a discrete k-grid, and the resulting eigenstates and dipole matrix elements. No parameters are fitted to the target excitonic quantities, no ansatz is smuggled via self-citation, and no prediction reduces by construction to an input. The symmetry-lifting effect emerges as an output of the momentum-resolved dipole analysis rather than being presupposed. The derivation chain therefore contains no load-bearing self-definitional or fitted-input steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumptions of many-body perturbation theory (GW quasiparticle energies and BSE kernel) plus the computed single-particle band structure of SnS2. No additional free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption GW approximation yields accurate quasiparticle band energies and wavefunctions for monolayer SnS2
    Invoked to obtain the input single-particle states for the BSE
  • domain assumption Bethe-Salpeter equation with static screening captures the bound excitons at the M points
    Core methodological assumption stated in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5575 in / 1285 out tokens · 53064 ms · 2026-05-15T16:29:21.095744+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Mas-Balleste, C

    R. Mas-Balleste, C. Gomez-Navarro, J. Gomez-Herrero, and F. Zamora, 2D materials: to graphene and beyond, Nanoscale3, 20 (2011)

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    M. Xu, T. Liang, M. Shi, and H. Chen, Graphene- like two-dimensional materials, Chem. Rev.113, 3766 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Gupta, T

    A. Gupta, T. Sakthivel, and S. Seal, Recent development in 2D materials beyond graphene, Prog. Mater. Sci.73, 44 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    J. R. Schaibley, H. Yu, G. Clark, P. Rivera, J. S. Ross, K. L. Seyler, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Valleytronics in 2D materials, Nat. Rev. Mat.1, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Manzeli, D

    S. Manzeli, D. Ovchinnikov, D. Pasquier, O. V. Yazyev, and A. Kis, 2D transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Rev. Mat.2, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    D. Liu, B. Qin, and L.-D. Zhao, SnSe/SnS: multifunc- tions beyond thermoelectricity, Materials Lab1, 220006 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Y. Sun, H. Cheng, S. Gao, Z. Sun, Q. Liu, Q. Liu, F. Lei, T. Yao, J. He, S. Wei, and Y. Xie, Freestanding tin disulfide single-layers realizing efficient visible-light wa- ter splitting, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.51, 8727 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    A. S. Sarkar, I. Konidakis, E. Gagaoudakis, G. M. Maragkakis, S. Psilodimitrakopoulos, D. Ka- terinopoulou, L. Sygellou, G. Deligeorgis, V. Binas, I. M. Oikonomou, P. Komninou, G. Kiriakidis, G. Kioseoglou, and E. Stratakis, Liquid phase iso- lation of SnS monolayers with enhanced optoelectronic properties, Adv. Sci.10, 2201842 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Sutter and E

    P. Sutter and E. Sutter, Growth mechanisms of anisotropic layered group IV chalcogenides on van der Waals substrates for energy conversion applications, ACS Appl. Nano Mater.1, 3026 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Sutter, J

    E. Sutter, J. Wang, and P. Sutter, Surface passivation by excess sulfur for controlled synthesis of large, thin SnS flakes, Chem. Mater.32, 8034 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    X. Hu, G. Song, W. Li, Y. Peng, L. Jiang, Y. Xue, Q. Liu, Z. Chen, and J. Hu, Phase-controlled synthesis and pho- tocatalytic properties of SnS, SnS 2 and SnS/SnS 2 het- erostructure nanocrystals, Mater. Res. Bull.48, 2325 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    M. Cao, K. Yao, C. Wu, J. Huang, W. Yang, L. Zhang, F. Lei, Y. Sun, L. Wang, and Y. Shen, Facile synthesis of SnS and SnS2 nanosheets for FTO/SnS/SnS2/Pt pho- tocathode, ACS Appl. Energy Mater.1, 6497 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Zribi, L

    J. Zribi, L. Khalil, B. Zheng, J. Avila, D. Pierucci, T. Brul´ e, J. Chaste, E. Lhuillier, M. C. Asensio, A. Pan, and A. Ouerghi, Strong interlayer hybridiza- tion in the aligned SnS 2/WSe2 hetero-bilayer structure, npj 2D Mater. Appl.3, 27 (2019). 10

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Sutter, H.-P

    P. Sutter, H.-P. Komsa, K. Kisslinger, and E. Sutter, Lat- eral Integration of SnS and GeSe van der Waals Semicon- ductors: Interface formation, electronic structure, and nanoscale optoelectronics, ACS Nano17, 9552 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Huang, E

    Y. Huang, E. Sutter, J. T. Sadowski, M. Cotlet, O. L. A. Monti, D. A. Racke, M. R. Neupane, D. Wickramaratne, R. K. Lake, B. A. Parkinson, and P. Sutter, Tin Disulfide – An Emerging Layered Metal Dichalcogenide Semicon- ductor: Materials Properties and Device Characteristics, ACS Nano8, 10743 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    Wu and X

    M. Wu and X. C. Zeng, Intrinsic ferroelasticity and/or multiferroicity in two-dimensional phosphorene and phosphorene analogues, Nano Lett.16, 3236 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Wang and X

    H. Wang and X. Qian, Giant optical second har- monic generation in two-dimensional multiferroics, Nano Lett.17, 5027 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Kumar, F

    A. Kumar, F. Telesio, D. Prezzi, C. Cardoso, A. Catel- lani, S. Forti, C. Coletti, M. Serrano-Ruiz, M. Pe- ruzzini, F. Beltram, and S. Heun, Black phosphorus n- type doping by Cu: a microscopic surface investigation, J. Phys. Chem. C125, 13477 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    F. Wu, F. Qu, and A. H. MacDonald, Exciton band struc- ture of monolayer MoS2, Phys. Rev. B91, 075310 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Zhong, G

    H. Zhong, G. Yang, H. Song, Q. Liao, H. Cui, P. Shen, and C.-X. Wang, Vertically aligned graphene-like SnS 2 ultrathin nanosheet arrays: excellent energy storage, catalysis, photoconduction, and field-emitting perfor- mances, J. Phys. Chem. C116, 9319 (2012)

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    H. L. Zhuang and R. G. Hennig, Theoretical perspec- tive of photocatalytic properties of single-layer SnS 2, Phys. Rev. B88, 115314 (2013)

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    B. Li, T. Xing, M. Zhong, L. Huang, N. Lei, J. Zhang, J. Li, and Z. Wei, A two-dimensional Fe-doped SnS2 mag- netic semiconductor, Nat. Commun.8, 1958 (2017)

    work page 1958

  23. [23]

    C. N. Eads, D. Bandak, M. R. Neupane, D. Nordlund, and O. L. Monti, Anisotropic attosecond charge carrier dynamics and layer decoupling in quasi-2D layered SnS2, Nat. Commun.8, 1369 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Bacaksiz, S

    C. Bacaksiz, S. Cahangirov, A. Rubio, R. T. Senger, F. M. Peeters, and H. Sahin, BilayerSnS 2: tunable stacking sequence by charging and loading pressure, Phys. Rev. B93, 125403 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    J. M. Gonzalez and I. I. Oleynik, Layer-dependent prop- erties of SnS 2 and SnSe 2 two-dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. B94, 125443 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Avetissian, S

    H. Avetissian, S. Israelyan, H. Matevosyan, and G. Mkrtchian, Saddle-point exciton signature on high- order harmonic generation in two-dimensional hexagonal nanostructures, Phys. Rev. A105, 063504 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Sharma, D

    S. Sharma, D. Gill, J. K. Dewhurst, P. Elliott, and S. Shallcross, Ultrafast Saddletronics: Current and Charge Control at the M Point, ACS NANO19, 37504 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Strain-Tuned Optical Properties of a Two-Dimensional Hexagonal Lattice: Exploiting Saddle Degrees of Freedom and Saddle Filtering Effects

    P. Nualpijit and B. Soodchomshom, Strain-tuned optical properties of a two-dimensional hexagonal lattice: Ex- ploiting saddle degrees of freedom and saddle filtering effects (2025), arXiv:2509.18539 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    K. L. Seyler, G. Soavi, B. Weber, S. Das, A. Agar- wal, I. Paradisanos, M. M. Glazov, O. Dogadov, F. Gucci, G. Cerullo, S. D. Conte, S. Biswas, J. Wil- helm, I. ˇZuti´ c, K. S. Denisov, T. Zhou, H. Zheng, W. Yao, H. Yu, T. Cao, D. Waters, M. Yankowitz, G. Burkard, A. Denisov, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, L. Gaudreau, J. Boddison-Chouinard, Z. Fedorova, I. Staude, ...

    work page arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Sangalli, A

    D. Sangalli, A. Ferretti, H. Miranda, C. Attaccalite, I. Marri, E. Cannuccia, P. Melo, M. Marsili, F. Paleari, A. Marrazzo, G. Prandini, P. Bonfa, M. O. Atambo, F. Affinito, M. Palummo, A. Molina-Sanchez, C. Hogan, M. Gruning, D. Varsano, and A. Marini, Many-body perturbation theory calculations using the yambo code, J. Phys. Condens. Matter.31, 325902 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Golze, M

    D. Golze, M. Dvorak, and P. Rinke, The GW com- pendium: a practical guide to theoretical photoemission spectroscopy, Front. Chem.7, 377 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Strinati, Application of the green’s functions method to the study of the optical properties of semiconductors, Riv

    G. Strinati, Application of the green’s functions method to the study of the optical properties of semiconductors, Riv. Nuovo Cimento11, 1 (1988)

    work page 1988

  33. [33]

    R. M. Martin, L. Reining, and D. M. Ceperley,Inter- acting Electrons: Theory and Computational Approaches (Cambridge University Press, 2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Cudazzo, I

    P. Cudazzo, I. V. Tokatly, and A. Rubio, Dielectric screening in two-dimensional insulators: Implications for excitonic and impurity states in graphane, Phys. Rev. B 84, 085406 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    P. Cudazzo, Separation between the long- and short- range part of the coulomb interaction in low-dimensional systems: Implications for the macroscopic screening length and collective charge excitations, Phys. Rev. B 111, 195122 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Palummo, M

    M. Palummo, M. Bernardi, and J. C. Grossman, Exciton radiative lifetimes in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Nano Lett.15, 2794 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    H.-Y. Chen, V. A. Jhalani, M. Palummo, and M. Bernardi, Ab initio calculations of exciton radiative lifetimes in bulk crystals, nanostructures, and molecules, Phys. Rev. B100, 075135 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. S...

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiS- tasio, Jr., A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawamura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Kokalj,...

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Gen- eralized Gradient Approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  41. [41]

    Sohier, M

    T. Sohier, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, Density func- tional perturbation theory for gated two-dimensional het- 11 erostructures: Theoretical developments and application to flexural phonons in graphene, Phys. Rev. B96, 075448 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B88, 085117 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Schlipf and F

    M. Schlipf and F. Gygi, Optimization algorithm for the generation of ONCV pseudopotentials, Com- put. Phys. Commun.196, 36 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Guandalini, D

    A. Guandalini, D. A. Leon, P. D’Amico, C. Cardoso, A. Ferretti, M. Rontani, and D. Varsano, Efficient GW calculations via interpolation of the screened interac- tion in momentum and frequency space: The case of graphene, Phys. Rev. B109, 075120 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    M. Ø. Filsø, E. Eikeland, J. Zhang, S. R. Madsen, and B. B. Iversen, Atomic and electronic structure transfor- mations in SnS 2 at high pressures: a joint single crystal X-ray diffraction and DFT study, Dalton Trans.45, 3798 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    J. Yu, E. van Veen, M. I. Katsnelson, and S. Yuan, Ef- fective lattice Hamiltonian for monolayer tin disulfide: Tailoring electronic structure with electric and magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B97, 245410 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Symmetries of excitons

    M. Nalabothula, D. Sangalli, F. Paleari, S. Re- ichardt, and L. Wirtz, Symmetries of excitons (2025), arXiv:2511.21540 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Paleari, A

    F. Paleari, A. Molina-S´ anchez, M. Nalabothula, R. Reho, M. Bonacci, J. M. Castelo, J. Cervantes-Villanueva, M. Pionteck, M. Silvetti, C. Attaccalite, and H. Pereira Coutada Miranda, Yambopy (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Y. Park, Y. Kim, C. W. Myung, R. A. Taylor, C. C. S. Chan, B. P. L. Reid, T. J. Puchtler, R. J. Nicholas, L. T. Singh, G. Lee, C.-C. Hwang, C.-Y. Park, and K. S. Kim, Two-dimensional excitonic photoluminescence in graphene on a Cu surface, ACS Nano11, 3207 (2017)

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Y. Park, G. Ying, R. A. Taylor, and C. C. Hwang, Ex- citon dynamics in monolayer graphene grown on a Cu (111) surface, npj 2D Mater. Appl.5, 69 (2021)

    work page 2021