Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 46 references

Riemannian geometric classification and emergent phenomena of magnetic textures

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-07-15 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Differential geometry splits noncoplanar magnets into three classes and shows that geodesic scalar spin chirality produces band asymmetry and nonreciprocal responses without spin-orbit coupling.

desk verdict Manuscript mismatch: abstract promises new geometric spin chiralities and orbital nonreciprocity, but the supplied full text is an unrelated fair-division paper, so the central claims cannot be checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.05955 v2 pith:RZN2NE7C submitted 2026-03-06 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el

Koki Shinada , Naoto Nagaosa This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords magnetictexturesscalarspinchiralitygeodesiccurvaturedifferentialgeometryemergentelectrodynamicsnonreciprocalresponsesquantumtopologicalHalleffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Magnetic textures are usually sorted as collinear, coplanar or noncoplanar by means of vector and scalar spin chirality. That sorting is incomplete: noncoplanar textures such as conical magnets are not fully captured by ordinary scalar spin chirality alone. By treating the curves and surfaces traced by the spins as geometric objects, the authors introduce two new scalar quantities—the geodesic scalar spin chirality (tied to geodesic curvature) and the torsional scalar spin chirality (tied to torsion). These quantities cleanly separate noncoplanar magnets into three distinct classes. A semiclassical theory that keeps non-adiabatic corrections and higher-order spatial gradients then shows that the geodesic chirality generates an emergent band asymmetry. The asymmetry produces nonreciprocal responses that are purely orbital and require no spin-orbit coupling, standing in exact parallel with the topological Hall effect driven by ordinary scalar spin chirality. The geometric language therefore both refines classification and supplies a new route to emergent electrodynamics.

What carries the argument

The geodesic scalar spin chirality, defined from the geodesic curvature of the spin curve on the unit sphere; together with a semiclassical expansion that retains non-adiabatic terms and higher-order spatial gradients of the texture, it generates the band asymmetry responsible for the nonreciprocal responses.

What would settle it

Compute or measure the band asymmetry and nonreciprocal conductivity for a clean conical magnet (finite geodesic chirality, vanishing ordinary scalar chirality, negligible spin-orbit coupling) and check whether the predicted orbital nonreciprocity appears at the order expected from the semiclassical formula.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Two novel scalar spin chiralities—the geodesic scalar spin chirality (linked to geodesic curvature) and the torsional scalar spin chirality (linked to torsion)—complete the geometric classification of magnetic textures and partition noncoplanar magnets into three classes; the geodesic chirality further induces an emergent band asymmetry that yields nonreciprocal transport as a purely orbital quantum-geometric effect, independent of spin-orbit coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical expansion that keeps only non-adiabatic corrections and higher-order spatial gradients is assumed to capture the leading contribution of geodesic scalar spin chirality; the regime of adiabaticity, gradient strength and temperature in which this expansion remains controlled is not stated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Noncoplanar magnets fall into three geometrically distinct classes once geodesic and torsional chiralities are included.
  • Geodesic scalar spin chirality generates an emergent orbital band asymmetry and nonreciprocal responses without any spin-orbit coupling.
  • The same geometric mechanism stands in parallel with the topological Hall effect driven by ordinary scalar spin chirality, suggesting a broader family of orbital emergent electrodynamics.
  • Classification, quantum geometry and transport of magnetic textures can be reorganized around the differential-geometric invariants of the spin curves and surfaces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Conical magnets become the natural experimental platform for isolating geodesic-chirality-driven nonreciprocity, because ordinary scalar chirality can be tuned to zero while geodesic curvature remains finite.
  • The same geometric language should apply to other continuous order-parameter textures (e.g., nematic or superconducting) whose real-space curves possess geodesic curvature or torsion.
  • Higher-order gradient expansions may systematically generate further multipole-like emergent fields once torsional chirality is retained.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The submission claims (via title and abstract) a differential-geometric reclassification of magnetic textures that introduces geodesic and torsional scalar spin chiralities, identifies three classes of noncoplanar magnets, and derives an emergent orbital band asymmetry (and nonreciprocal responses) from the geodesic SSC via a semiclassical expansion that retains nonadiabatic effects and higher-order spatial gradients, without requiring spin-orbit coupling. The supplied full manuscript text, however, is an unrelated algorithmic paper on EF1+fPO balanced allocations of indivisible goods under additive valuations (personalized bivalued and two-type cases), containing matching algorithms, LP duals, and complexity results but none of the claimed geometric definitions, chiralities, or transport calculations.

Significance. If the magnetic-texture claims were substantiated by matching derivations they would constitute a useful refinement of spin-chirality taxonomy and a parallel orbital mechanism to the topological Hall effect. As submitted, the body is a competent but orthogonal contribution to fair division; the mismatch nullifies any significance for the stated condensed-matter claims.

major comments (2)
  1. Title/abstract versus body: the entire manuscript (Sections 1–7, Algorithms 1–2, Propositions 1–2, Lemmas 1–12, Theorems 1–4) treats balanced EF1+fPO allocation of indivisible goods; it contains no Riemannian geometry, no geodesic/torsional SSC definitions, no semiclassical expansion, and no band-asymmetry calculation. The central claim of the abstract is therefore unsupported by any equation or derivation in the provided text.
  2. Because the load-bearing semiclassical theory (nonadiabatic effects + higher-order gradients) is absent, it is impossible to verify the regime of validity, the leading-order status of the geodesic SSC, or the claimed absence of spin-orbit coupling. This is not a presentation issue but a complete absence of the claimed technical content.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identifiable: geodesic/torsional SSC are introduced from standard differential geometry, and the band-asymmetry claim is presented as a derived consequence of a semiclassical expansion, not as a definitional restatement of its inputs.

full rationale

Only the abstract of arXiv:2603.05955 is available for the claimed magnetic-texture paper; the supplied full-text block is an unrelated fair-division manuscript (Kawase & Mahara). From the abstract alone, the geodesic scalar spin chirality and torsional scalar spin chirality are introduced via ordinary differential-geometric notions (geodesic curvature and torsion of the curves/surfaces traced by spins). The subsequent claim that geodesic SSC produces emergent band asymmetry and nonreciprocal responses is framed as the output of a constructed semiclassical theory that retains nonadiabatic effects and higher-order spatial gradients, running in parallel with the known topological Hall effect of ordinary SSC. Nothing in the abstract defines the new chiralities in terms of the band asymmetry they are said to produce, fits a parameter to data and renames the fit a prediction, or rests the central premise on a load-bearing self-citation uniqueness theorem. Because no equations, expansion parameters, or self-citations are present to inspect, no reduction of a claimed result to its own inputs can be exhibited. Per the rules, absence of quotable circular steps yields score 0 and an empty steps list. (Correctness or completeness of the missing derivation is outside the circularity criterion.)

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 2 invented entities

Abstract-only review. The load-bearing premises that can be extracted are the conventional VSC/SSC taxonomy, the applicability of classical differential geometry (geodesic curvature and torsion) to discrete or continuum spin textures, and the validity of a semiclassical expansion that retains nonadiabatic and higher-gradient terms. No free parameters or invented particles appear in the abstract; the new chiralities are defined constructs rather than postulated entities with independent mass or charge.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Conventional classification of magnetic textures into collinear, coplanar and noncoplanar classes characterized by VSC and SSC is incomplete for noncoplanar cases such as conical magnets.
    Stated as motivation in the abstract; taken as background knowledge of the field.
  • standard math Curves and surfaces traced by spins in real space can be analyzed with the classical notions of geodesic curvature and torsion of differential geometry.
    Standard differential geometry applied to spin textures; assumed valid for the continuum or lattice models under consideration.
  • ad hoc to paper A semiclassical theory that includes nonadiabatic effects and higher-order spatial gradients of the magnetic texture is sufficient to extract the leading contribution of geodesic SSC to electronic band asymmetry.
    The abstract presents this construction as the vehicle for the emergent-phenomena claim; its controlled regime is not stated.
invented entities (2)
  • geodesic scalar spin chirality
    purpose: Quantify noncoplanarity via geodesic curvature and generate emergent band asymmetry / nonreciprocal responses.
    Defined construct introduced in the abstract; no independent experimental handle (mass, spectrum, etc.) is given outside the paper's own framework.
  • torsional scalar spin chirality
    purpose: Quantify noncoplanarity via torsion and complete the three-class taxonomy of noncoplanar textures.
    Defined construct introduced in the abstract; likewise lacks an external falsifiable signature in the provided text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Riemannian geometric classification and emergent phenomena of magnetic textures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RZN2NE7C

@misc{pith2026260305955,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Riemannian geometric classification and emergent phenomena of magnetic textures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RZN2NE7C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.05955}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a new classification of magnetic textures from the viewpoint of differential geometry. Magnetic textures are conventionally classified into collinear, coplanar, and noncoplanar magnets. These classes are typically characterized by the vector spin chirality (VSC) and the scalar spin chirality (SSC), which indicate noncollinearity and noncoplanarity, respectively. However, this conventional classification is incomplete: in particular, noncoplanar textures cannot be fully characterized by the SSC alone, as exemplified by conical magnets. To refine this classification, we analyze the curves and surfaces traced by spins in real space using differential geometry and introduce two novel scalar spin chiralities that properly characterize noncoplanarity: the geodesic scalar spin chirality and the torsional scalar spin chirality. These quantities are directly connected to differential geometry: the former reflects the geodesic curvature while the latter is related to the torsion. Based on these chiralities, we identify three distinct classes of noncoplanar magnetic textures. Furthermore, analogous to the roles of the VSC and the conventional SSC in emergent electrodynamics, the geodesic SSC gives rise to novel emergent phenomena. By constructing a semiclassical theory including nonadiabatic effects and higher-order spatial gradients of magnetic textures, we demonstrate that the geodesic SSC induces an emergent band asymmetry, leading to nonreciprocal responses as a quantum geometric effect. This mechanism is a purely orbital effect, requiring no spin-orbit coupling, and the resulting discussion runs in parallel with the conventional picture of the topological Hall effect driven by the SSC. The geometric viewpoint developed here will provide broad new insights into classification, quantum geometry, emergent electrodynamics, and a wider variety of emergent phenomena.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Maximizing nash social welfare in 2-value instances

    Hannaneh Akrami, Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Martin Hoefer, Kurt Mehlhorn, Marco Schmal- hofer, Golnoosh Shahkarami, Giovanna Varricchio, Quentin Vermande, and Ernest van Wij- land. Maximizing nash social welfare in 2-value instances. InProceedings of the AAAI Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 4760–4767, 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Fair division of indivisible goods: Recent progress and open questions.Artificial Intelligence, 322:103965, 2023

    Georgios Amanatidis, Haris Aziz, Georgios Birmpas, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Bo Li, Herv´ e Moulin, Alexandros A Voudouris, and Xiaowei Wu. Fair division of indivisible goods: Recent progress and open questions.Artificial Intelligence, 322:103965, 2023. 19

    2023

  3. [3]

    Voudouris

    Georgios Amanatidis, Georgios Birmpas, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Alexandros Hollender, and Alexandros A. Voudouris. Maximum nash welfare and other stories about EFX.Theoreti- cal Computer Science, 863:69–85, 2021

    2021

  4. [4]

    Fair allocation of indivisible goods and chores.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 36:1–21, 2022

    Haris Aziz, Ioannis Caragiannis, Ayumi Igarashi, and Toby Walsh. Fair allocation of indivisible goods and chores.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 36:1–21, 2022

    2022

  5. [5]

    Algorithmic fair allocation of indivisible items: A survey and new questions.ACM SIGecom Exchanges, 20(1):24–40, 2022

    Haris Aziz, Bo Li, Herv´ e Moulin, and Xiaowei Wu. Algorithmic fair allocation of indivisible items: A survey and new questions.ACM SIGecom Exchanges, 20(1):24–40, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Fair allocation of two types of chores

    Haris Aziz, Jeremy Lindsay, Angus Ritossa, and Mashbat Suzuki. Fair allocation of two types of chores. InProceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), page 143–151, 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Finding fair and efficient allocations

    Siddharth Barman, Sanath Kumar Krishnamurthy, and Rohit Vaish. Finding fair and efficient allocations. InProceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC), pages 557–574, 2018

    2018

  8. [8]

    How to compute equilibrium prices in 1891.American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 64(1):57–83, 2005

    William C Brainard and Herbert E Scarf. How to compute equilibrium prices in 1891.American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 64(1):57–83, 2005

    2005

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Cambridge University Press, 1996

    Steven John Brams and Alan D Taylor.Fair Division: From cake-cutting to dispute resolution. Cambridge University Press, 1996

    1996

  2. [10]

    Cambridge University Press, 2016

    Felix Brandt, Vincent Conitzer, Ulle Endriss, J´ erˆ ome Lang, and Ariel D Procaccia.Handbook of computational social choice. Cambridge University Press, 2016

    2016

  3. [11]

    The combinatorial assignment problem: Approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes.Journal of Political Economy, 119(6):1061–1103, 2011

    Eric Budish. The combinatorial assignment problem: Approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes.Journal of Political Economy, 119(6):1061–1103, 2011

    2011

  4. [12]

    On the complexity of pareto-optimal and envy-free lotteries

    Ioannis Caragiannis, Kristoffer Arnsfelt Hansen, and Nidhi Rathi. On the complexity of pareto-optimal and envy-free lotteries. InProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pages 244–252, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Procaccia, Nisarg Shah, and Junxing Wang

    Ioannis Caragiannis, David Kurokawa, Herv´ e Moulin, Ariel D. Procaccia, Nisarg Shah, and Junxing Wang. The unreasonable fairness of maximum Nash welfare.ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 7(3):12:1–32, 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    On the existence of pareto efficient and envy-free allocations

    Richard Cole and Yixin Tao. On the existence of pareto efficient and envy-free allocations. Journal of Economic Theory, 193:105207, 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    Constrained fair and efficient al- locations

    Benjamin Cookson, Soroush Ebadian, and Nisarg Shah. Constrained fair and efficient al- locations. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 13718–13726, 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    On the complexity of efficiency and envy-freeness in fair division of indivisible goods with additive preferences

    Bart De Keijzer, Sylvain Bouveret, Tomas Klos, and Yingqian Zhang. On the complexity of efficiency and envy-freeness in fair division of indivisible goods with additive preferences. In International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory, pages 98–110. Springer, 2009. 20

    2009

  9. [17]

    Market equilibrium via a primal–dual algorithm for a convex program.Journal of the ACM, 55(5):22:1– 18, 2008

    Nikhil R Devanur, Christos H Papadimitriou, Amin Saberi, and Vijay V Vazirani. Market equilibrium via a primal–dual algorithm for a convex program.Journal of the ACM, 55(5):22:1– 18, 2008

    2008

  10. [18]

    How to fairly allocate easy and diffi- cult chores

    Soroush Ebadian, Dominik Peters, and Nisarg Shah. How to fairly allocate easy and diffi- cult chores. InProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pages 372–380, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Springer, Berlin; New York, 2nd edition, 2005

    Matthias Ehrgott.Multicriteria Optimization. Springer, Berlin; New York, 2nd edition, 2005

    2005

  12. [20]

    Yale University, 1966

    Duncan Karl Foley.Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale University, 1966

    1966

  13. [21]

    Computing fair and efficient allocations with few utility values.Theoretical Computer Science, 962:113932, 2023

    Jugal Garg and Aniket Murhekar. Computing fair and efficient allocations with few utility values.Theoretical Computer Science, 962:113932, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Fair and efficient allocations of chores under bivalued preferences

    Jugal Garg, Aniket Murhekar, and John Qin. Fair and efficient allocations of chores under bivalued preferences. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 5043–5050, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    New algorithms for the fair and efficient al- location of indivisible chores

    Jugal Garg, Aniket Murhekar, and John Qin. New algorithms for the fair and efficient al- location of indivisible chores. InProceedings of the 32nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 2710–2718, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    Weighted EF1 and PO allocations with few types of agents or chores

    Jugal Garg, Aniket Murhekar, and John Qin. Weighted EF1 and PO allocations with few types of agents or chores. InProceedings of the 33rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 2799–2806, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    A survey on fair allocation of chores.Mathematics, 11(16):3616:1–28, 2023

    Hao Guo, Weidong Li, and Bin Deng. A survey on fair allocation of chores.Mathematics, 11(16):3616:1–28, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Fair and efficient allocation of indivisible items under category constraints.arXiv:2503.20260, 2025

    Ayumi Igarashi and Fr´ ed´ eric Meunier. Fair and efficient allocation of indivisible items under category constraints.arXiv:2503.20260, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    The Nash social welfare function.Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 423–435, 1979

    Mamoru Kaneko and Kenjiro Nakamura. The Nash social welfare function.Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 423–435, 1979

    1979

  20. [28]

    On the max-min fair stochastic allocation of indivisible goods

    Yasushi Kawase and Hanna Sumita. On the max-min fair stochastic allocation of indivisible goods. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 2070–2078, 2020

  21. [29]

    Random assignment of indivisible goods under constraints

    Yasushi Kawase, Hanna Sumita, and Yu Yokoi. Random assignment of indivisible goods under constraints. InProceedings of the 32nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 2792–2799, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    Random assignment of multiple indivisible objects.Mathematical Social Sciences, 57(1):134–142, 2009

    Fuhito Kojima. Random assignment of multiple indivisible objects.Mathematical Social Sciences, 57(1):134–142, 2009

    2009

  23. [31]

    APX-hardness of maximizing Nash social welfare with indivisible items.In- formation Processing Letters, 122:17–20, 2017

    Euiwoong Lee. APX-hardness of maximizing Nash social welfare with indivisible items.In- formation Processing Letters, 122:17–20, 2017. 21

    2017

  24. [32]

    Lipton, Evangelos Markakis, Elchanan Mossel, and Amin Saberi

    Richard J. Lipton, Evangelos Markakis, Elchanan Mossel, and Amin Saberi. On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods. InProceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), pages 125–131, 2004

    2004

  25. [33]

    Existence of EFX for two additive valuations.Discrete Applied Mathematics, 340:115–122, 2023

    Ryoga Mahara. Existence of EFX for two additive valuations.Discrete Applied Mathematics, 340:115–122, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Extension of additive valuations to general valuations on the existence of efx

    Ryoga Mahara. Extension of additive valuations to general valuations on the existence of efx. Mathematics of operations research, 49(2):1263–1277, 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    A polynomial-time algorithm for fair and efficient allocation with a fixed number of agents.arXiv:2411.01810, 2024

    Ryoga Mahara. A polynomial-time algorithm for fair and efficient allocation with a fixed number of agents.arXiv:2411.01810, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Existence of fair and efficient allocation of indivisible chores.arXiv:2507.09544, 2025

    Ryoga Mahara. Existence of fair and efficient allocation of indivisible chores.arXiv:2507.09544, 2025

    2025

  29. [37]

    John F. Nash. The bargaining problem.Econometrica, 18(2):155–162, 1950

    1950

  30. [38]

    Computational complexity and approximability of social welfare optimization in multiagent resource alloca- tion.Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, 28(2):256–289, 2014

    Nhan-Tam Nguyen, Trung Thanh Nguyen, Magnus Roos, and J¨ org Rothe. Computational complexity and approximability of social welfare optimization in multiagent resource alloca- tion.Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, 28(2):256–289, 2014

    2014

  31. [39]

    Improved algorithms for computing fisher’s market clearing prices: Computing fisher’s market clearing prices

    James B Orlin. Improved algorithms for computing fisher’s market clearing prices: Computing fisher’s market clearing prices. InProceedings of the forty-second ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC), pages 291–300, 2010

    2010

  32. [40]

    Algorithms and Combinatorics

    Alexander Schrijver.Combinatorial Optimization: Polyhedra and Efficiency. Algorithms and Combinatorics. Springer, 2003

    2003

  33. [41]

    Efficient nearly-fair division with capacity constraints

    Hila Shoshan, Noam Hazon, and Erel Segal-Halevi. Efficient nearly-fair division with capacity constraints. InProceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pages 206–214, 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    Constraints in fair division.ACM SIGecom Exchanges, 19(2):46–61, 2021

    Warut Suksompong. Constraints in fair division.ACM SIGecom Exchanges, 19(2):46–61, 2021

    2021

  35. [43]

    Cardinal-utility matching markets: The quest for envy-freeness, pareto-optimality, and efficient computability.arXiv:2402.08851, 2024

    Thorben Tr¨ obst and Vijay V Vazirani. Cardinal-utility matching markets: The quest for envy-freeness, pareto-optimality, and efficient computability.arXiv:2402.08851, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Equity, envy, and efficiency.Journal of Economic Theory, 9(1):63–91, 1974

    Hal R Varian. Equity, envy, and efficiency.Journal of Economic Theory, 9(1):63–91, 1974

    1974

  37. [45]

    Strongly polynomial algorithm for a class of minimum-cost flow problems with separable convex objectives

    L´ aszl´ o A V´ egh. Strongly polynomial algorithm for a class of minimum-cost flow problems with separable convex objectives. InProceedings of the forty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC), pages 27–40, 2012

    2012

  38. [46]

    Budget-feasible maximum nash social welfare is almost envy-free

    Xiaowei Wu, Bo Li, and Jiarui Gan. Budget-feasible maximum nash social welfare is almost envy-free. InProceedings of the 30th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 465–471, 2021. 22 A Omitted Proof Proof of Lemma 1.We remark that the weighted...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed July 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.