Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 cited by

RoboStream: Weaving Spatio-Temporal Reasoning with Memory in Vision-Language Models for Robotics

T0 review · 3 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Vision-language robot planners fail on long tasks because they rebuild geometry from pixels and forget action history; RoboStream fixes both with persistent 3D object tokens and a causal memory graph, without training.

desk verdict Training-free VLM planner that binds visual patches to 3D Gaussians and logs action-triggered state transitions; large, ablated gains on long-horizon RLBench and real Franka, with one real confound in the memory ablation. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.12939 v2 pith:JMOT4K54 submitted 2026-03-13 cs.RO

Yuzhi Huang , Jie Wu , Weijue Bu , Ziyi Xiong , Gaoyang Jiang , Ye Li , Kangye Ji , Shuzhao Xie
show 4 more authors
Yue Huang Chenglei Wu Jingyan Jiang Zhi Wang
This is my paper
classification cs.RO
keywords robotmanipulationvision-languagemodelslong-horizonplanningspatio-temporalreasoningcausalmemoryobjectpermanencetraining-free
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Vision-language models that plan robot actions usually treat every step as a fresh look at the camera: they re-guess where objects are from raw pixels and keep no record of what earlier moves did to the scene. That works for short pick-and-place work but collapses on long sequences—small spatial errors compound, temporarily hidden objects are forgotten, and later steps fail because the assumed preconditions no longer hold. RoboStream is a training-free method that binds each object's visual evidence to its measured 3D center and shape (Spatio-Temporal Fusion Tokens) and logs every action-triggered state change in a Causal Spatio-Temporal Graph. The same off-the-shelf models then reach 90.5% average success on eight long-horizon simulation tasks and 44.4% on hard real block-building, while prior systems score near 11%. The paper's claim is that geometric anchoring and causal memory, not merely larger models, are the missing pieces for reliable multi-step manipulation.

What carries the argument

Spatio-Temporal Fusion Tokens (STF-Tokens) compress each object's filtered visual patches together with its 3D centroid and Gaussian shape into a single identity-stable reference; the Causal Spatio-Temporal Graph (CSTG) stores those tokens across a sliding window plus action-triggered events, so the planner can query last-known pose and causal history even when an object is fully hidden.

What would settle it

Run the same long-horizon hide-and-restore block tasks while deliberately corrupting or swapping segmentation masks and object IDs mid-episode; if success collapses while the causal graph still receives those broken identities, the claim that the memory structures themselves are doing the decisive work is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The dominant failure of VLM-based robot planners on long-horizon work is the lack of two representations: identity-persistent geometric anchors that stop the model from re-inferring 3D geometry from pixels at every step, and an explicit causal log of how actions and occlusions rewrite object states. Injecting Spatio-Temporal Fusion Tokens and a Causal Spatio-Temporal Graph into an otherwise unchanged VLM recovers object permanence under occlusion and prevents cascading precondition violations, producing large gains on both simulated multi-step benchmarks and real Franka block tasks with no fine-tuning.

Load-bearing premise

The system assumes open-vocabulary segmentation and language parsing will keep assigning the same object the same identity mask across many steps even under stacking, full occlusion, and color-similar distractors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Long multi-step stacking, covering, and restoration tasks become reliable once geometric identity and causal history are supplied, even for 8B-scale models.
  • Zero-shot transfer across robot embodiments improves because geometry is expressed in metric 3D rather than image-specific features.
  • Model scale helps more once the memory structures exist; without them, larger VLMs still fail on occlusion and multi-step consistency.
  • Reactive planners that rebuild the scene from pixels each step remain limited on any task that requires object permanence or reverse-order restoration.
  • Structured memory can be injected without fine-tuning and still close much of the gap previously expected only from end-to-end action models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same token-plus-graph pattern could be internalized inside continuous vision-language-action controllers so causal memory guides low-level motion, not only high-level plans.
  • Because parsing and detection already dominate real-world failures, further gains may come more from identity-stable open-vocabulary tracking than from larger planners.
  • If the causal graph is the main driver of long-horizon gains, lighter discrete geometric state machines might deliver similar reliability at lower latency.
  • Contact-rich or deformable tasks would test whether Gaussian shape slots are enough or need richer physical attributes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. RoboStream is a training-free planning framework that injects two structured representations into a VLM loop for long-horizon robotic manipulation: Spatio-Temporal Fusion Tokens (STF-Tokens), which bind per-object visual patches to 3D centroids and Gaussian shape parameters (Eqs. 1, 5; §3.3), and a Causal Spatio-Temporal Graph (CSTG) that maintains sliding-window object identities and action-triggered event logs (Eqs. 2, 6; §3.4). Semantic action directives from the VLM are then deterministically grounded to 6-DoF poses via stored geometry (Eqs. 3–4). Evaluated zero-shot across SIMPLER, eight long-horizon RLBench tasks, 6-DoF SpatialBench, Open6DOR V2, and 21 real Franka tasks, the method reports 90.5% average success on long-horizon RLBench (RoboStream-235B) and 44.4% on hard real block-building, versus 11.1% for SoFar and VoxPoser, with ablations (Table 5; Appendix Table 8) attributing large gains to CSTG and secondary gains to STF-Tokens.

Significance. If the results hold under tighter controls, the paper makes a clear empirical case that persistent geometric anchoring and structured cross-step memory—not model scale alone—are decisive for long-horizon VLM planners. Strengths include: (i) a fully training-free design that transfers across embodiments (Google Robot, WidowX, Franka) without fine-tuning; (ii) multi-benchmark coverage spanning short-horizon spatial grounding, long-horizon occlusion/restoration, and real hardware; (iii) scale sweeps (8B/32B/235B) and component ablations that cleanly show CSTG is necessary for multi-step consistency; and (iv) an honest real-world failure breakdown (Appendix C.2). These are concrete, falsifiable contributions to embodied VLM planning and would be of interest to the robotics and VLM communities.

major comments (3)
  1. Table 5 / Appendix Table 8 and §4.6: the claim that “causal memory” is the critical missing component rests on the w/o-CSTG collapse (90.5% → 14.5% at 235B). The ablated condition removes both the causal event structure and essentially all multi-step history/scaffolding from the prompt (Sec. 3.4–3.5). There is no control that retains a non-causal history of comparable length (e.g., raw prior action captions, a flat object list without event sources, or an unstructured sliding window). Without that control, the 76-point drop confounds causal structure with simply giving the VLM more context for chain-of-thought verification. The same pattern appears at 8B/32B. Either add such a control or soften the abstract/title/§5 language from “causal memory” to “structured persistent memory,” and state the isolation limit explicitly.
  2. §3.2–3.3 and Appendix C.2: identity-preserving object parsing is a load-bearing assumption. Descriptors and SAM3 masks are conditioned on M_<t, yet 20.7% of real-world failures are already Object Parsing & Detection errors under color-similar distractors and stacking occlusion. The paper does not quantify identity-switch or re-ID rates over long horizons, nor does it report sensitivity to the free parameters I_th (patch IoU filter) and sliding-window length K. Because STF-Tokens and CSTG nodes inherit these identities, a short quantitative study of re-ID stability (and of K / I_th) is needed to support the claim of “persistent object grounding” under occlusion.
  3. §4.2 / Tables 6–7 and §4.4 / Table 2: success rates are reported without uncertainty. Real-world tasks use only three trials each (so 44.4% is 4/9), and RLBench uses 25 episodes per task with no confidence intervals or binomial error bars. The headline comparisons (e.g., 44.4% vs 11.1%; 90.5% vs 28.0%) are directionally convincing but not statistically characterized. Please report intervals (or at least raw counts consistently) and, where feasible, increase real-world trial counts for the hard settings that drive the abstract claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: empirical training-free system evaluated on external benchmarks; success rates are measured outcomes, not quantities forced by construction from fitted inputs or self-defined premises.

full rationale

RoboStream is a training-free engineering framework (STF-Tokens + CSTG + off-the-shelf VLM) whose central claims are empirical success rates on held-out RLBench long-horizon tasks, SIMPLER, SpatialBench, Open6DOR V2, and real-world Franka block tasks, compared against external baselines (SoFar, VoxPoser, RT-2-X, etc.). There is no derivation in which a quantity is defined from data and then re-presented as a prediction of that same quantity; no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors; no ansatz smuggled via self-citation; and no renaming of a known closed-form result. Equations (1)–(6) construct tokens and a graph from RGB-D observations and then condition a VLM; the reported percentages are execution success rates, not algebraic identities of the inputs. Ablation Table 5 / Appendix Table 8 remove modules and re-measure success—they do not redefine the metric in terms of the modules. Using the same VLM family for object parsing and planning is standard multi-use of a backbone and does not force the benchmark numbers. Experimental confounds about whether the CSTG ablation cleanly isolates causal structure (vs. prompt length) are correctness/design concerns, not circularity. Score 0 is therefore the correct finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard robotics assumptions (RGB-D cameras, open-vocabulary segmentation, VLM chain-of-thought) plus two paper-specific constructs (STF-Tokens and CSTG) whose utility is shown only by ablation inside this work. A handful of free thresholds (IoU, window length) are chosen by hand. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • IoU threshold Ith for visual-patch filtering
    Hand-chosen cutoff that decides which image patches enter each STF-Token; not derived or swept in the main results.
  • Sliding-window length K for CSTG memory
    Fixed buffer size that truncates causal history; set to 3 in the latency experiment, not justified by theory.
  • Choice of VLM backbone scale (8B/32B/235B) and SAM3
    Performance scales strongly with backbone size; the reported SOTA numbers use the largest model, so the claim is partly capacity-dependent.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Open-vocabulary segmentation (SAM3) plus VLM parsing yields identity-consistent masks across long horizons under occlusion and distractors.
    Invoked in §3.2; failure analysis later shows 20.7% of real errors already come from this step.
  • domain assumption A frozen VLM can perform reliable chain-of-thought precondition checking when given structured STF-Tokens and CSTG text without any fine-tuning.
    Core of the training-free claim (§3.5); 43.5% of real failures remain VLM planning errors.
  • ad hoc to paper Gaussian shape parameters plus median centroid are a sufficient 3D geometric summary for 6-DoF placement.
    Defined in §3.3; alternative shape representations are not compared.
invented entities (2)
  • Spatio-Temporal Fusion Tokens (STF-Tokens)
    purpose: Bind filtered visual patches to 3D centroid and Gaussian shape so the VLM reasons over persistent object instances rather than raw pixels.
    New composite representation introduced in §3.3; utility shown only by ablation inside this paper.
  • Causal Spatio-Temporal Graph (CSTG)
    purpose: Maintain object identities and log action-triggered state transitions (including occlusions) so the planner can recover hidden objects.
    New memory structure defined in §3.4; necessity demonstrated by the large drop when removed (Table 5).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of RoboStream: Weaving Spatio-Temporal Reasoning with Memory in Vision-Language Models for Robotics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JMOT4K54

@misc{pith2026260312939,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: RoboStream: Weaving Spatio-Temporal Reasoning with Memory in Vision-Language Models for Robotics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JMOT4K54}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.12939}
}
read the original abstract

Enabling reliable long-horizon robotic manipulation is a crucial step toward open-world embodied intelligence. However, VLM-based planners treat each step as an isolated observation-to-action mapping, forcing them to reinfer scene geometry from raw pixels at every decision point while remaining unaware of how prior actions have reshaped the environment. Despite strong short-horizon performance, these systems lack the spatio-temporal reasoning required for persistent geometric anchoring and memory of action-triggered state transitions. Without persistent state tracking, perceptual errors accumulate across the execution horizon, temporarily occluded objects are catastrophically forgotten, and these compounding failures lead to precondition violations that cascade through subsequent steps. In contrast, humans maintain a persistent mental model that continuously tracks spatial relations and action consequences across interactions rather than reconstructing them at each instant. Inspired by this human capacity for causal spatio-temporal reasoning with persistent memory, we propose RoboStream, a training-free framework that achieves geometric anchoring through Spatio-Temporal Fusion Tokens (STF-Tokens), which bind visual evidence to 3D geometric attributes for persistent object grounding, and maintains causal continuity via a Causal Spatio-Temporal Graph (CSTG) that records action-triggered state transitions across steps. This design enables the planner to trace causal chains and preserve object permanence under occlusion without additional training or fine-tuning. RoboStream achieves 90.5% on long-horizon RLBench and 44.4% on challenging real-world block-building tasks, where both SoFar and VoxPoser score 11.1%, demonstrating that spatio-temporal reasoning and causal memory are critical missing components for reliable long-horizon manipulation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.12939 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Qualitative comparison between SoFar [41] and RoboStream. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of the RoboStream Framework. The system processes multi￾modal RGB-D inputs through three hierarchical stages: (1) Object-Centric Perception and Spatio-Temporal Token Fusion, where raw visual data is distilled into STF-Tokens by grounding visual evidence within 3D geometric primitives (centroids and Gaussian shapes); (2) 4D Causal Spatio-Temporal Graph Construction, which maintains persistent memory encoding… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Qualitative results in real-world and simulated manipulation tasks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Performance comparison on zero-shot real-world manipulation tasks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Real-world experimental setup. (a) The Franka Research 3 robot arm used in our experiments. (b) The physical workspace equipped with the robot arm and an Intel RealSense D435i camera; the insets show the corresponding RGB view and depth map. B Experimental Assets and T…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Assets for real-world experiments. A collection of 17 manipulation objects including geometric primitives, a triangular prism, and functional objects used across all task difficulty levels. B.1 Design of Real World Tasks To rigorously validate the core contributions of…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Long-horizon block manipulation (Easy). Execution of basic assembly and disassembly involving 2–3 objects, demonstrating fundamental spatial grounding and pick-and-place precision. Block Building and Disassembly ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Long-horizon block manipulation (Medium). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Long-horizon block manipulation (Hard). Extreme long-horizon execution involving 7 objects and 6–7 steps. The sequence highlights the model’s ability to maintain physical stability during complex “Bottom-to-Top” building and “Top-to￾Bottom” disassembly without collapsi…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Long-horizon Block Hide and Restore task (Occlusion). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Visualization of short-horizon Evaluation Tasks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Goal-Image Guided long-horizon Tasks. Execution sequences for five long-horizon tasks in RLBench where the target state is provided via a visual goal image. These tasks systematically evaluate the model’s ability to maintain spatial coherence and track multiple object…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Text-Guided long-horizon Tasks. Execution sequences in RLBench driven by natural language instructions. Tasks involving severe occlusion explicitly evaluate the CSTG’s capacity for causal memory and object permanence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Failure case distribution analysis of RoboStream from real-world experi￾ments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: System prompt of parsing and vqa reasoning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: System prompt of general manipulation task [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Visualization example of 6-DoF SpatialBench data samples [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Visualization example of Open6dor V2 data samples [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_18.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ChainVLA: Chaining Vision-Language-Action Queries through a Unified Execution State for Long-Horizon Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ChainVLA chains vision-language-action queries by carrying both retrieved task progress and the previous prediction's unexecuted suffix into each new action horizon, reaching 62.8% on RMBench and 98.8% on LIBERO.

  2. One Hand Watches The Other: Dynamic Multi-Agent Cooperation for Sample-Efficient Bimanual Manipulation in Dynamic Environments

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DynaMAC extends multi-stream robot policies to dynamic and bimanual manipulation by masking kinematically linked reference frames and using the opposite arm as a dynamic frame, giving zero-shot transfer from static demos.

  3. DynTrace: Tracking Dynamic Object Evidence for 4D Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in MLLMs

    cs.CV 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A training-free pipeline that feeds MLLMs reprojected motion arrows plus a structured trace graph lifts 4D spatio-temporal QA accuracy on three benchmarks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

162 extracted references · 16 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Armeni, I., He, Z.Y., Gwak, J., Zamir, A.R., Fischer, M., Malik, J., Savarese, S.: 3d scene graph: A structure for unified semantics, 3d space, and camera. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 5664–5673 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01823 (2024)

    Belkhale, S., Ding, T., Xiao, T., Sermanet, P., Vuong, Q., Tompson, J., Chebotar, Y., Dwibedi, D., Sadigh, D.: Rt-h: Action hierarchies using language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01823 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06817 (2022)

    Brohan, A., Brown, N., Carbajal, J., Chebotar, Y., Dabis, J., Finn, C., Gopalakr- ishnan, K., Hausman, K., Herzog, A., Hsu, J., et al.: Rt-1: Robotics transformer for real-world control at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06817 (2022)

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    In: Conference on robot learning

    Brohan, A., Chebotar, Y., Finn, C., Hausman, K., Herzog, A., Ho, D., Ibarz, J., Irpan, A., Jang, E., Julian, R., et al.: Do as i can, not as i say: Grounding language in robotic affordances. In: Conference on robot learning. pp. 287–318. PMLR (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Cai, W., Ponomarenko, I., Yuan, J., Li, X., Yang, W., Dong, H., Zhao, B.: Spa- tialbot: Precise spatial understanding with vision language models. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 9490–9498. IEEE (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.16719 (2025)

    Carion, N., Gustafson, L., Hu, Y.T., Debnath, S., Hu, R., Suris, D., Ryali, C., Alwala, K.V., Khedr, H., Huang, A., et al.: Sam 3: Segment anything with concepts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.16719 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15493 (2025)

    Cheang, C., Chen, S., Cui, Z., Hu, Y., Huang, L., Kong, T., Li, H., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Ma, X., et al.: Gr-3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15493 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Chen, B., Xu, Z., Kirmani, S., Ichter, B., Sadigh, D., Guibas, L., Xia, F.: Spatialvlm: Endowingvision-languagemodelswithspatialreasoningcapabilities.In:Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 14455–14465 (2024)

    2024

Show all 162 references
  1. [9]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.04069 (2025)

    Chen, S., Uy, M.A., Song, C.H., Ladhak, F., Murali, A., Qu, Q., Birchfield, S., Blukis, V., Tremblay, J.: Spacetools: Tool-augmented spatial reasoning via double interactive rl. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.04069 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 135062–135093 (2024)

    Cheng, A.C., Yin, H., Fu, Y., Guo, Q., Yang, R., Kautz, J., Wang, X., Liu, S.: Spatialrgpt: Grounded spatial reasoning in vision-language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 135062–135093 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Daxberger, E., Wenzel, N., Griffiths, D., Gang, H., Lazarow, J., Kohavi, G., Kang, K., Eichner, M., Yang, Y., Dehghan, A., et al.: Mm-spatial: Exploring 3d spatial understanding in multimodal llms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp...

    2025

  4. [12]

    In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Ding, Y., Geng, H., Xu, C., Fang, X., Zhang, J., Wei, S., Dai, Q., Zhang, Z., Wang, H.: Open6dor: Benchmarking open-instruction 6-dof object rearrangement and a vlm-based approach. In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). pp. 7359–73...

    2024

  5. [13]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929 (2020)

    Dosovitskiy,A.,Beyer,L.,Kolesnikov,A.,Weissenborn,D.,Zhai,X.,Unterthiner,T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., et al.: An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929 (2020)

    2010 arXiv

  6. [14]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    Driess, D., Xia, F., Sajjadi, M.S., Lynch, C., Chowdhery, A., Ichter, B., Wahid, A., Tompson, J., Vuong, Q., Yu, T., et al.: Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 8469–8488. PMLR (2023) 16 Y. Huang et al

    2023

  7. [15]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07280 (2023)

    Du, Y., Konyushkova, K., Denil, M., Raju, A., Landon, J., Hill, F., de Fre- itas, N., Cabi, S.: Vision-language models as success detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07280 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Robotics: Science and Systems XX (2024)

    Fang, K., Liu, F., Abbeel, P., Levine, S.: Moka: Open-world robotic manipulation through mark-based visual prompting. Robotics: Science and Systems XX (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02013 (2025)

    Gu, C., Liu, J., Chen, H., Huang, R., Wuwu, Q., Liu, Z., Li, X., Li, Y., Zhang, R., Jia, P., et al.: Manualvla: A unified vla model for chain-of-thought manual generation and robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02013 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    In: The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track

    Han, S., Qiu, B., Liao, Y., Huang, S., Gao, C., YAN, S., Liu, S.: Robocerebra: A large-scale benchmark for long-horizon robotic manipulation evaluation. In: The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track

  11. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.07181 (2025)

    Han, Y., Chi, C., Zhou, E., Rong, S., An, J., Wang, P., Wang, Z., Sheng, L., Zhang, S.: Tiger: Tool-integrated geometric reasoning in vision-language models for robotics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.07181 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    In: First Workshop on Vision-Language Models for Navigation and Manipulation at ICRA 2024

    Hu, Y., Lin, F., Zhang, T., Yi, L., Gao, Y.: Look before you leap: Unveiling the power of gpt-4v in robotic vision-language planning. In: First Workshop on Vision-Language Models for Navigation and Manipulation at ICRA 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Huang, H., Lin, F., Hu, Y., Wang, S., Gao, Y.: Copa: General robotic manipulation through spatial constraints of parts with foundation models. In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). pp. 9488–9495. IEEE (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Huang, S., Chang, H., Liu, Y., Zhu, Y., Dong, H., Boularias, A., Gao, P., Li, H.: A3vlm: Actionable articulation-aware vision language model. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 1675–1690. PMLR (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    In: International conference on machine learning

    Huang, W., Abbeel, P., Pathak, D., Mordatch, I.: Language models as zero-shot planners: Extracting actionable knowledge for embodied agents. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 9118–9147. PMLR (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Huang, W., Wang, C., Li, Y., Zhang, R., Fei-Fei, L.: Rekep: Spatio-temporal reasoning of relational keypoint constraints for robotic manipulation. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 4573–4602. PMLR (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Huang, W., Wang, C., Zhang, R., Li, Y., Wu, J., Fei-Fei, L.: Voxposer: Composable 3d value maps for robotic manipulation with language models. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 540–562. PMLR (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 59636–59661 (2023)

    Huang, W., Xia, F., Shah, D., Driess, D., Zeng, A., Lu, Y., Florence, P., Mordatch, I., Levine, S., Hausman, K., et al.: Grounded decoding: Guiding text generation with grounded models for embodied agents. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 59636–59661 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Huang, W., Xia, F., Xiao, T., Chan, H., Liang, J., Florence, P., Zeng, A., Tompson, J., Mordatch, I., Chebotar, Y., et al.: Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 1769–1782. PMLR (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276 (2024)

    Hurst, A., Lerer, A., Goucher, A.P., Perelman, A., Ramesh, A., Clark, A., Ostrow, A., Welihinda, A., Hayes, A., Radford, A., et al.: Gpt-4o system card. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(2), 3019–3026 (2020)

    James, S., Ma, Z., Arrojo, D.R., Davison, A.J.: Rlbench: The robot learning benchmark & learning environment. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(2), 3019–3026 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    Jiang, Y., Gupta, A., Zhang, Z., Wang, G., Dou, Y., Chen, Y., Fei-Fei, L., Anand- kumar, A., Zhu, Y., Fan, L.: Vima: Robot manipulation with multimodal prompts. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 14975–15022. PMLR (2023) RoboStream 17

    2023

  23. [31]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Kapelyukh, I., Ren, Y., Alzugaray, I., Johns, E.: Dream2Real: Zero-shot 3D object rearrangement with vision-language models. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 4796–4803. IEEE (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Kim, M.J., Pertsch, K., Karamcheti, S., Xiao, T., Balakrishna, A., Nair, S., Rafailov, R., Foster, E.P., Sanketi, P.R., Vuong, Q., et al.: Openvla: An open-source vision- language-action model. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 2679–2713. PMLR (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Behavioral and brain sciences40, e253 (2017)

    Lake, B.M., Ullman, T.D., Tenenbaum, J.B., Gershman, S.J.: Building machines that learn and think like people. Behavioral and brain sciences40, e253 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Nature Machine Intelligence pp

    Li, X., Li, P., Qian, L., Liu, M., Wang, D., Liu, J., Kang, B., Ma, X., Wang, X., Guo, D., et al.: What matters in building vision–language–action models for generalist robots. Nature Machine Intelligence pp. 1–15 (2026)

    2026

  27. [35]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Li, X., Hsu, K., Gu, J., Mees, O., Pertsch, K., Walke, H.R., Fu, C., Lunawat, I., Sieh, I., Kirmani, S., et al.: Evaluating real-world robot manipulation policies in simulation. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 3705–3728. PMLR (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

    Li, Y., Deng, Y., Zhang, J., Jang, J., Memmel, M., Garrett, C.R., Ramos, F., Fox, D., Li, A., Gupta, A., et al.: Hamster: Hierarchical action models for open-world robot manipulation. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

  29. [37]

    In: 2023 IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA)

    Liang, J., Huang, W., Xia, F., Xu, P., Hausman, K., Ichter, B., Florence, P., Zeng, A.: Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control. In: 2023 IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). pp. 9493–9500. IEEE (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    In: 2nd Workshop on Language and Robot Learning: Language as Grounding

    Liu, H., Chen, A., Zhu, Y., Swaminathan, A., Kolobov, A., Cheng, C.A.: Interactive robot learning from verbal correction. In: 2nd Workshop on Language and Robot Learning: Language as Grounding

  31. [39]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00171 (2024)

    Mao, W., Zhong, W., Jiang, Z., Fang, D., Zhang, Z., Lan, Z., Li, H., Jia, F., Wang, T., Fan, H., et al.: Robomatrix: A skill-centric hierarchical framework for scalable robot task planning and execution in open-world. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00171 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 25081–25094 (2023)

    Mu, Y., Zhang, Q., Hu, M., Wang, W., Ding, M., Jin, J., Wang, B., Dai, J., Qiao, Y., Luo, P.: Embodiedgpt: Vision-language pre-training via embodied chain of thought. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 25081–25094 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    In: The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

    Qi, Z., Zhang, W., Ding, Y., Dong, R., Yu, X., Li, J., Xu, L., Li, B., He, X., Fan, G., et al.: Sofar: Language-grounded orientation bridges spatial reasoning and object manipulation. In: The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

  34. [42]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Qin, Y., Kang, L., Song, X., Yin, Z., Liu, X., Liu, X., Zhang, R., Bai, L.: Robofac- tory: Exploring embodied agent collaboration with compositional constraints. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 10075–10085 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15830 (2025)

    Qu, D., Song, H., Chen, Q., Yao, Y., Ye, X., Ding, Y., Wang, Z., Gu, J., Zhao, B., Wang, D., et al.: Spatialvla: Exploring spatial representations for visual-language- action model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15830 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    In: International conference on machine learning

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al.: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 8748–8763. PmLR (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Huang et al

    Ray, A., Duan, J., Brown II, E.L., Tan, R., Bashkirova, D., Hendrix, R., Ehsani, K., Kembhavi, A., Plummer, B.A., Krishna, R., et al.: Sat: Dynamic spatial aptitude 18 Y. Huang et al. training for multimodal language models. In: Second Conference on Language Modeling

  38. [46]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05186 (2022)

    Sharma, P., Sundaralingam, B., Blukis, V., Paxton, C., Hermans, T., Torralba, A., Andreas, J., Fox, D.: Correcting robot plans with natural language feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05186 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Robotics: Science and Systems XX (2024)

    Shi, L., Hu, Z., Zhao, T., Sharma, A., Pertsch, K., Luo, J., Levine, S., Finn, C.: Yell at your robot: Improving on-the-fly from language corrections. Robotics: Science and Systems XX (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    Shi, L.X., Ichter, B., Equi, M.R., Ke, L., Pertsch, K., Vuong, Q., Tanner, J., Walling, A., Wang, H., Fusai, N., et al.: Hi robot: Open-ended instruction following with hierarchical vision-language-action models. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 54919–5493...

    2025

  41. [49]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Shridhar, M., Manuelli, L., Fox, D.: Perceiver-actor: A multi-task transformer for robotic manipulation. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 785–799. PMLR (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Singh, I., Blukis, V., Mousavian, A., Goyal, A., Xu, D., Tremblay, J., Fox, D., Thomason, J., Garg, A.: Progprompt: Generating situated robot task plans using large language models. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 11523–11530. IEEE (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference

    Song, C.H., Blukis, V., Tremblay, J., Tyree, S., Su, Y., Birchfield, S.: Robospatial: Teaching spatial understanding to 2d and 3d vision-language models for robotics. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference. pp. 15768–15780 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03673 (2025)

    Tan, H., Hao, X., Chi, C., Lin, M., Lyu, Y., Cao, M., Liang, D., Chen, Z., Lyu, M., Peng, C., et al.: Roboos: A hierarchical embodied framework for cross-embodiment and multi-agent collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03673 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12213 (2024)

    Team, O.M., Ghosh, D., Walke, H., Pertsch, K., Black, K., Mees, O., Dasari, S., Hejna, J., Kreiman, T., Xu, C., et al.: Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12213 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Wald, J., Dhamo, H., Navab, N., Tombari, F.: Learning 3d semantic scene graphs from 3d indoor reconstructions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 3961–3970 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    Wang, X., Ma, W., Zhang, T., de Melo, C.M., Chen, J., Yuille, A.: Spatial457: A diagnostic benchmark for 6d spatial reasoning of large multimodal models. In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 24669–24679. IEEE (2025)

    2025

  48. [56]

    Advances in neural information processing systems35, 24824–24837 (2022)

    Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q.V., Zhou, D., et al.: Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems35, 24824–24837 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Wen, J., Zhu, Y., Li, J., Tang, Z., Shen, C., Feng, F.: Dexvla: Vision-language model with plug-in diffusion expert for general robot control. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 3094–3114. PMLR (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    In: 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Wu,J.,Antonova,R.,Kan,A.,Lepert,M.,Zeng,A.,Song,S.,Bohg,J.,Rusinkiewicz, S., Funkhouser, T.: Tidybot: Personalized robot assistance with large language models. In: 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). pp. 3546–3553. IEEE (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 (2025)

    Yang, A., Li, A., Yang, B., Zhang, B., Hui, B., Zheng, B., Yu, B., Gao, C., Huang, C., Lv, C., et al.: Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11441 (2023) RoboStream 19

    Yang, J., Zhang, H., Li, F., Zou, X., Li, C., Gao, J.: Set-of-mark prompting unleashes extraordinary visual grounding in gpt-4v. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11441 (2023) RoboStream 19

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    In: CVPR (2024)

    Yang, L., Kang, B., Huang, Z., Xu, X., Feng, J., Zhao, H.: Depth anything: Un- leashing the power of large-scale unlabeled data. In: CVPR (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00411 (2025)

    Yang, Y., Sun, J., Kou, S., Wang, Y., Deng, Z.: Lohovla: A unified vision-language- action model for long-horizon embodied tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00411 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  55. [63]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Yu, W., Gileadi, N., Fu, C., Kirmani, S., Lee, K.H., Arenas, M.G., Chiang, H.T.L., Erez, T., Hasenclever, L., Humplik, J., et al.: Language to rewards for robotic skill synthesis. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 374–404. PMLR (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Yuan, W., Duan, J., Blukis, V., Pumacay, W., Krishna, R., Murali, A., Mousavian, A., Fox, D.: Robopoint: A vision-language model for spatial affordance prediction in robotics. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 4005–4020. PMLR (2025)

    2025

  57. [65]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Zawalski, M., Chen, W., Pertsch, K., Mees, O., Finn, C., Levine, S.: Robotic control via embodied chain-of-thought reasoning. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 3157–3181. PMLR (2025)

    2025

  58. [66]

    In: The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations

    Zeng, A., Attarian, M., Choromanski, K.M., Wong, A., Welker, S., Tombari, F., Purohit, A., Ryoo, M.S., Sindhwani, V., Lee, J., et al.: Socratic models: Composing zero-shot multimodal reasoning with language. In: The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations

  59. [67]

    In: 2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Zhang, K., Yin, Z.H., Ye, W., Gao, Y.: Learning manipulation skills through robot chain-of-thought with sparse failure guidance. In: 2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). pp. 8012–8018. IEEE (2025)

    2025

  60. [68]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference

    Zhao, Q., Lu, Y., Kim, M.J., Fu, Z., Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., Li, Z., Ma, Q., Han, S., Finn, C., et al.: Cot-vla: Visual chain-of-thought reasoning for vision-language- action models. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference. pp. 1702–1713 (2025)

    2025

  61. [69]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    Zhen, H., Qiu, X., Chen, P., Yang, J., Yan, X., Du, Y., Hong, Y., Gan, C.: 3d-vla: A 3d vision-language-action generative world model. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 61229–61245. PMLR (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    In: The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

    Zhou, E., An, J., Chi, C., Han, Y., Rong, S., Zhang, C., Wang, P., Wang, Z., Huang, T., Sheng, L., et al.: Roborefer: Towards spatial referring with reasoning in vision-language models for robotics. In: The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

  63. [71]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference

    Zhou, E., Su, Q., Chi, C., Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., Huang, T., Sheng, L., Wang, H.: Code-as-monitor: Constraint-aware visual programming for reactive and proactive robotic failure detection. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference. pp. 6919–6929 (2025)

    2025

  64. [72]

    In: The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

    Zhu, K., Bai, F., Xiang, Y., Cai, Y., Chen, X., Li, R., Wang, X., Dong, H., Yang, Y., Fan, X., et al.: Dexflywheel: A scalable and self-improving data generation framework for dexterous manipulation. In: The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

  65. [73]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Zitkovich, B., Yu, T., Xu, S., Xu, P., Xiao, T., Xia, F., Wu, J., Wohlhart, P., Welker, S., Wahid, A., et al.: Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 2165–2183. PMLR (2023) 20 Y. Huang et al. Appendi...

    2023

  66. [74]

    Grasp the green cube. 2. Place the green cube to the right of the blue cube

  67. [75]

    Grasp the orange rectangle. 4. Rotate th gripper 90 degrees to prepare for placing

  68. [76]

    Place the orange rectangle on the top center of the blue cube and green cube

  69. [77]

    Assemble the blocks to match the goal image

    Return the robot arm to the home position. Assemble the blocks to match the goal image. Disassemble the structure to match the goal image

  70. [79]

    Grasp the orange rectangle. 3. Place the orange rectangle to the right of the pink flag

  71. [81]

    Grasp the blue cube. 6. Place the blue cube to the right of the orange rectangle

  72. [82]

    Grasp the green cube. 8. Place the green cube to the right of the blue cube

  73. [83]

    Return the robot arm to the home position. Fig.7: Long-horizon block manipulation (Easy).Execution of basic assembly and disassembly involving 2–3 objects, demonstrating fundamental spatial grounding and pick-and-place precision. Block Building and Disassembly (Fig. 7, 8, 9).T...

  74. [84]

    Grasp the orange rectangle. 2. Rotate th gripper 90 degrees to prepare for placing

  75. [85]

    Place the orange rectangle on the purple rectangle

  76. [87]

    Place the green cube on the orange rectangle

  77. [89]

    Grasp the yellow triangle. 8. Place the yellow triangle on the green cube

  78. [90]

    Disassemble the structure to match the goal image

    Return the robot arm to the home position. Disassemble the structure to match the goal image

  79. [92]

    Grasp the yellow triangle. 3. Place the yellow triangle to the right of the pink flag

  80. [93]

    Grasp the green cube. 5. Place the green cube to the right of the yellow rectangle

  81. [95]

    Grasp the orange rectangle. 8. Place the orange rectangle to the right of the green cube

  82. [96]

    Rotate th gripper 90 degrees and grasp the purple rectangle

  83. [97]

    Place the purple rectangle to the right of the orange rectangle

  84. [98]

    Return the robot arm to the home position. Fig.8: Long-horizon block manipulation (Medium).Intermediate execution requiring a strict sequence of 3–4 steps to manipulate 4 objects, verifying sequential planning and state tracking. correct Top-to-Bottom dependency chain from the...

  85. [99]

    Grasp the yellow cube. 2. Place the yellow cube to the right of the blue cube

  86. [100]

    Grasp the green cube

    Grasp the blue cylinder.3. Grasp the green cube. 4. Place the green cube to the right of the yellow cube

  87. [101]

    Grasp the pink cylinder. 6. Place the pink cylinder to the top center of the blue cube and yellow cube

  88. [102]

    Place the blue cylinder to the top center of the yellow cube and green cube

  89. [103]

    Grasp the purple rectangle. 10. Rotate th gripper 90 degrees to prepare for placing

  90. [104]

    Place the purple rectangle to the top center of the pink cylinder and blue cylinder

  91. [105]

    Rotate th gripper 90 degrees to prepare for grasping

  92. [106]

    Grasp the yellow triangle. 14. Place the yellow triangle on the purple rectangle

  93. [107]

    Assemble the blocks to match the goal image

    Return the robot arm to the home position. Assemble the blocks to match the goal image

  94. [108]

    Rotate th gripper 90 degrees and grasp the yellow triangle

  95. [109]

    Place the yellow triangle to the right of the pink flag

  96. [110]

    Rotate th gripper 90 degrees and grasp the purple rectangle

    Grasp the blue cylinder.3. Rotate th gripper 90 degrees and grasp the purple rectangle

  97. [111]

    Place the purple rectangle to the right of the yellow triangle

  98. [112]

    Grasp the pink cylinder. 6. Place the pink cylinder to the right of the purple rectangle

  99. [113]

    Place the blue cylinder to the right of the pink cylinder

  100. [114]

    Grasp the blue cube. 10. Place the blue cube to the right of the blue cylinder

  101. [115]

    Grasp the yellow cube. 12. Place the yellow cube to the right of the blue cube

  102. [116]

    Grasp the green cube. 14. Place the green cube to the right of the yellow cube

  103. [117]

    Bottom-to-Top

    Return the robot arm to the home position. Disassemble the structure to match the goal image. Fig.9: Long-horizon block manipulation (Hard).Extreme long-horizon execution involving 7 objects and 6–7 steps. The sequence highlights the model’s ability to maintain physical stabil...

  104. [118]

    Grasp the blue cube. 2. Place the blue cube to the left of the tower

  105. [119]

    Grasp the pink cube. 4. Place the pink cube to the right ot the tower

  106. [120]

    Grasp the purple cube.Hide the purple cube, then restore the original state

  107. [121]

    Grasp the brown cup. 8. Hide the purple cube with the brown cup

  108. [122]

    Release the brown cup and return to home

  109. [123]

    Grasp the brown cup to reveal the purple cube

  110. [124]

    Place the purple cube to the left of the brown cup

    Lift the brown cup.6. Place the purple cube to the left of the brown cup

  111. [125]

    Grasp the pink cube. 14. Place the pink cube on the purple cube

  112. [126]

    Grasp the blue cube. 16. Place the blue cube on th pink cube

  113. [127]

    Return the robot arm to the home position

  114. [128]

    Pick Coke Can

    Place the brown cup to the right. Fig.10: Long-horizon Block Hide and Restore task (Occlusion).A stress-test for causal memory and object permanence. The robot hides the purple cube beneath a brown cup, executes intermediate distractor steps, and successfully retrieves the hid...

  115. [133]

    Grasp the bridge block

  116. [134]

    Place the bridge block （ 1 ） bridge_between_towers （ 2 ） place_blocks_in_two_containers arrange the objects to match the goal image

  117. [137]

    （ 3 ） place_blocks_in_two_containers_hard arrange the objects to match the goal image

    Place the green cube into the purple container. （ 3 ） place_blocks_in_two_containers_hard arrange the objects to match the goal image

  118. [139]

    Place the purple cube into the purple container

  119. [142]

    Place the blue cube into the yellow container

  120. [144]

    （ 4 ） stack_three_colors arrange the objects to match the goal image

    Place the green cube into the purple container. （ 4 ） stack_three_colors arrange the objects to match the goal image

  121. [147]

    （ 5 ） stack_five_colors arrange the objects to match the goal image

    Place the blue cube on the top of the green cube. （ 5 ） stack_five_colors arrange the objects to match the goal image

  122. [149]

    Place the green cube on the top of the red cube

  123. [150]

    Place the blue cube on the top of the green cube

  124. [152]

    Place the yellow cube on the top of the blue cube

  125. [153]

    Grasp the purple cube

  126. [154]

    Place the purple cube on the top of the yellow cube. Goal Image Goal Image Goal Image Goal Image Goal Image Fig.12: Goal-Image Guided long-horizon Tasks.Execution sequences for five long-horizon tasks in RLBench where the target state is provided via a visual goal image. These...

  127. [155]

    Prepare to grasp the yellow cube

  128. [156]

    Grasp the yellow cube

  129. [157]

    Place the yellow cube into the yellow container

  130. [158]

    Place the blue cube into the blue container

  131. [160]

    Place the green cube into the green container

  132. [161]

    （ 1 ） unstack_then_stack_four_colors

    Place the red cube into the red container. （ 1 ） unstack_then_stack_four_colors

  133. [162]

    Place the red cube on the top of the target plane

  134. [164]

    Place the green cube into the red cube

  135. [165]

    16 Grasp the yellow cube

    Place the blue cube on the top of the green cube. 16 Grasp the yellow cube

  136. [166]

    （ 2 ） cover_top_block_with_box Cover the red cube on the target, move right, then restack it

    Place the yellow cube into the blue cube. （ 2 ） cover_top_block_with_box Cover the red cube on the target, move right, then restack it

  137. [167]

    Prepare to grasp the red cube

  138. [168]

    Place the red cube on the target plane

  139. [170]

    （ 3 ） cover_bottom_block_with_box Cover the blue cube on the target, move right, then restack it

    Place the red cube on the top of the green cube. （ 3 ） cover_bottom_block_with_box Cover the blue cube on the target, move right, then restack it

  140. [171]

    Place the red cube in front of the blue cube

  141. [173]

    Place the green cube in front of the red cube

  142. [174]

    Place the blue cube on the top of the target plane

  143. [175]

    Place the box on the right of the target plane

  144. [176]

    Grasp the green cube

  145. [177]

    Place the green cube on the top of the blue cube

  146. [178]

    Fig.13: Text-Guided long-horizon Tasks.Execution sequences in RLBench driven by natural language instructions

    Place the red cube on the top of the green cube. Fig.13: Text-Guided long-horizon Tasks.Execution sequences in RLBench driven by natural language instructions. Tasks involving severe occlusion explicitly evaluate the CSTG’s capacity for causal memory and object permanence. Rob...

  147. [179]

    [color/attribute] [name]

    Universal Identification: Identify every distinct task-relevant object (blocks, tools, containers, etc.). Use a "[color/attribute] [name]" format (e.g., "red cube", "metal bowl", "green screwdriver")

  148. [180]

    Do not include static elements like the robot arm, table, or background

    Relevance Filter: Focus only on objects to be manipulated or used as reference. Do not include static elements like the robot arm, table, or background

  149. [181]

    obj1", "obj2

    Output Format: Output exactly one json object. Keys must be "obj1", "obj2", "obj3"... in order. Do not add extra text, explanations, or Markdown code fences. Example Output: {"obj1": "red cube", "obj2": "silver wrench", "obj3": "blue plastic bin"} [VQA System Prompt ] Role: Yo...

  150. [182]

    - Precise 3D Centroid Coordinates (x, y, z)

    STF-Tokens (Spatio-Temporal Fusion Tokens): Treat the workspace as a collection of structured token sequences, where each object is uniquely defined by: - Unique Object Identifier & Semantic Label. - Precise 3D Centroid Coordinates (x, y, z). - Gaussian Shape Parameters (defin...

  151. [183]

    - State transition logs (tracking object displacement and state changes)

    Causal Memory Log(Persistent Episodic Data): Maintain a comprehensive, historical record of: - Chronological sequence of all previously executed actions. - State transition logs (tracking object displacement and state changes). - Analysis of external disturbances (monitoring e...

  152. [184]

    Cognitive Memory Review: Synthesize the current global world state by cross- referencing the latest visual input with the long-term Causal Memory Log to detect hidden objects or state drift

  153. [185]

    Pre-condition & Constraint Analysis: Perform a rigorous feasibility check—validate if the target object is reachable, identify any potential collision risks, and evaluate physical dependencies (e.g., support relationships or stacking stability)

  154. [186]

    8" [B]:

    Spatio-Temporal Alignment: Dynamically map the high-level goal specification (whether image-based or text-driven) onto the current 3D geometry of the STF-Tokens to ensure spatial groundedness, then output the actionable manipulation primitive. Fig.16:System prompt of general m...

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.