pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.15751 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-16 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

The photon-energy spectrum in Bto X_sγ to N³LO: light-fermion and large-N_{rm c} corrections

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 09:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords B to Xs gammaphoton energy spectrumN3LO QCD correctionslight fermion loopslarge Nc limitquark mass schemesradiative B decays
0
0 comments X

The pith

The photon-energy spectrum in B to Xs gamma decays reaches N3LO accuracy with light-fermion and large-Nc corrections included.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper computes the photon energy spectrum for the inclusive radiative B meson decay to strange hadrons plus a photon, driven by the electromagnetic dipole operator. The result is obtained to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order in the strong coupling, with the full set of light-fermion corrections, all contributions from two closed massive fermion loops, and the large number of colors limit applied to the remaining terms. The total decay rate is evaluated both with and without a lower cut on photon energy. Different bottom-quark mass renormalization schemes are compared, and the kinetic and MSR schemes are shown to produce a more stable perturbative series than the on-shell scheme.

Core claim

The photon-energy spectrum in B→Xsγ induced by the operator O7 is computed to N3LO, incorporating the full set of light-fermion corrections, the contributions involving two closed massive fermion loops, and the large-Nc approximation for the remaining parts. The total decay rate is presented both with and without a photon energy cut, and the use of the kinetic and MSR mass schemes for the bottom quark results in an improved perturbative convergence of the decay rate compared to the on-shell scheme.

What carries the argument

The N3LO perturbative expansion of the photon spectrum from the electromagnetic dipole operator O7, with complete light-fermion and double massive-loop pieces plus the large-Nc limit on the rest.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbative series in the strong coupling remains reliable at N3LO and the chosen quark mass schemes genuinely improve convergence without introducing uncontrolled higher-order effects.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement of the photon energy spectrum shape above 1.8 GeV that deviates from the N3LO prediction by more than the quoted theoretical uncertainty after experimental unfolding.

read the original abstract

We calculate the photon-energy spectrum of the inclusive radiative decay $B\to X_s\gamma$, induced by the electromagnetic dipole operator $O_7$, to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order and consider the complete corrections for light fermions, for the contributions with two closed massive fermion loops, and for the limit of large QCD colour factors $N_{\rm c}$ in the remaining part. We discuss the total decay rate both without and with a cut on the photon energy. In addition to the on-shell renormalization of the bottom-quark mass, we also consider the kinetic mass and the MSR mass schemes. The latter two lead to an improved perturbative behaviour of the decay rate.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates the photon-energy spectrum for the inclusive decay B → X_s γ induced by the electromagnetic dipole operator O7 to N³LO in QCD. It includes the complete light-fermion corrections, the full contributions from two closed massive fermion loops, and applies the strict large-N_c limit to all remaining diagrams. Results are given for the differential spectrum and the total rate, both without and with a photon-energy cut. The authors also compare the on-shell, kinetic, and MSR bottom-quark mass schemes, noting improved perturbative convergence in the kinetic and MSR schemes.

Significance. If the central results hold, this work advances the perturbative precision of B → X_s γ predictions, which are important for |V_ts| extractions and new-physics searches. The systematic inclusion of exact fermion-loop pieces at N³LO together with the large-N_c treatment of the remainder, plus the explicit comparison of mass schemes, addresses known convergence issues in the series. The focus on the spectrum (rather than only the total rate) and the numerical illustrations of scheme dependence are useful for phenomenology.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3 and §4] §3 (N³LO assembly) and §4 (numerical results): The N³LO spectrum is constructed by taking the exact light-fermion and two-massive-fermion contributions while replacing the remaining non-fermionic diagrams by their strict large-N_c limit. No separate 1/N_c expansion, N_c-variation scan, or power-counting bound on the omitted O(1/N_c) terms is supplied. Because the quoted N³LO accuracy rests on these neglected pieces being small throughout the photon-energy range, an explicit estimate or numerical test of their size is required to support the precision claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] The notation for the various mass schemes (on-shell, kinetic, MSR) is introduced clearly, but a short table summarizing the scheme-dependent coefficients at each perturbative order would improve readability.
  2. [§4] Figure 3 (spectrum plots) would benefit from an additional panel or inset showing the relative size of the N³LO correction in the large-N_c approximation versus the retained fermion pieces.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major comment point by point below, providing our response and indicating the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3 and §4] §3 (N³LO assembly) and §4 (numerical results): The N³LO spectrum is constructed by taking the exact light-fermion and two-massive-fermion contributions while replacing the remaining non-fermionic diagrams by their strict large-N_c limit. No separate 1/N_c expansion, N_c-variation scan, or power-counting bound on the omitted O(1/N_c) terms is supplied. Because the quoted N³LO accuracy rests on these neglected pieces being small throughout the photon-energy range, an explicit estimate or numerical test of their size is required to support the precision claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of the expected size of the omitted O(1/N_c) terms would strengthen the presentation of the N³LO results. A full computation of the 1/N_c corrections at this order lies beyond the scope of the present work, as it would require evaluating a large number of additional diagrams not included in the large-N_c limit. However, we can provide supporting evidence from the known lower-order results: the 1/N_c corrections to the NLO and NNLO contributions to the spectrum are numerically small (typically below 15% of the leading large-N_c piece across the relevant photon-energy range). We will revise §3 to include a brief paragraph summarizing this observation, together with a conservative error estimate of ±20% on the non-fermionic N³LO piece, and we will add a corresponding remark in §4 when presenting the numerical results. This constitutes a partial revision that addresses the referee’s concern without requiring new diagrammatic calculations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct perturbative evaluation from diagrams

full rationale

The manuscript computes the N3LO photon spectrum via explicit Feynman-diagram evaluation in the effective theory, retaining exact light-fermion and two-massive-fermion contributions while applying the large-Nc limit only to the remaining diagrams. No parameter is fitted to a data subset and then re-predicted; no quantity is defined in terms of itself; the large-Nc treatment is stated as an approximation without any uniqueness theorem or self-citation chain that would force the final result. The derivation therefore remains independent of its inputs beyond the standard perturbative expansion and mass-scheme choices.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result rests on standard assumptions of perturbative QCD and the effective weak Hamiltonian for b to s gamma transitions; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The electromagnetic dipole operator O7 dominates the decay amplitude at the relevant scale
    Standard starting point for inclusive B to Xs gamma calculations in the effective theory
  • domain assumption The operator product expansion applies to the inclusive rate and photon spectrum
    Required to express the decay in terms of local operators and perturbative coefficients
  • domain assumption The perturbative expansion in alpha_s converges sufficiently at N3LO
    Implicit in presenting N3LO results as the state of the art

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5431 in / 1431 out tokens · 56121 ms · 2026-05-15T09:54:07.251741+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · 54 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Updated NNLO QCD predictions for the weak radiative B-meson decays

    M. Misiak et al.,Updated Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Order QCD Predictions for the Weak RadiativeB-Meson Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 221801 [1503.01789]

  2. [2]

    The (Q_7,Q_{1,2}) contribution to B -> X_s gamma at O(alpha_s^2)

    M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, T. Huber, M. Misiak, T. Schutzmeier and M. Steinhauser, The(Q 7, Q1,2)contribution to B→X sγatO α2 s ,JHEP04(2015) 168 [1503.01791]

  3. [3]

    Misiak, A

    M. Misiak, A. Rehman and M. Steinhauser,Towards B→X sγat the NNLO in QCD without interpolation in m c,JHEP06(2020) 175 [2002.01548]. [11]Belle-IIcollaboration,Snowmass White Paper: Belle II physics reach and plans for the next decade and beyond,2207.06307

  4. [4]

    Analysis of the Photon Spectrum in Inclusive $B\to X_s\,\gamma$ Decays

    M. Neubert,Analysis of the photon spectrum in inclusiveB→X sγdecays,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 4623 [hep-ph/9312311]

  5. [5]

    On the Motion of Heavy Quarks inside Hadrons: Universal Distributions and Inclusive Decays

    I.I. Bigi, M.A. Shifman, N.G. Uraltsev and A.I. Vainshtein,On the motion of heavy quarks inside hadrons: Universal distributions and inclusive decays,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9(1994) 2467 [hep-ph/9312359]

  6. [6]

    QCD-Based Interpretation of the Lepton Spectrum in Inclusive $\bar B\to X_u\,\ell\,\bar\nu$ Decays

    M. Neubert,QCD-based interpretation of the lepton spectrum in inclusive B→X uℓνdecays,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 3392 [hep-ph/9311325]

  7. [7]

    Treating the b quark distribution function with reliable uncertainties

    Z. Ligeti, I.W. Stewart and F.J. Tackmann,Treating the b quark distribution function with reliable uncertainties,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 114014 [0807.1926]. [16]SIMBAcollaboration,Precision Global Determination of theB→X sγDecay Rate,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 102001 [2007.04320]

  8. [8]

    Dehnadi, I

    B. Dehnadi, I. Novikov and F.J. Tackmann,The photon energy spectrum in B→ Xsγat N 3LL’,JHEP07(2023) 214 [2211.07663]

  9. [9]

    M. Fael, T. Huber, F. Lange, J. M¨ uller, K. Sch¨ onwald and M. Steinhauser, Heavy-to-light form factors to three loops,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 056011 [2406.08182]

  10. [10]

    The photon energy spectrum in B-> X_s + \gamma in perturbative QCD through O(\alpha_s^2)

    K. Melnikov and A. Mitov,The photon energy spectrum inB→X s +γin perturbative QCD throughO(α 2 s),Phys. Lett. B620(2005) 69 [hep-ph/0505097]. – 32 –

  11. [11]

    Magnetic dipole operator contributions to the photon energy spectrum in anti-B -> X(s) gamma at O(alpha(s)^2)

    H.M. Asatrian, T. Ewerth, A. Ferroglia, P. Gambino and C. Greub,Magnetic dipole operator contributions to the photon energy spectrum in B→X sγatO(α 2 s), Nucl. Phys. B762(2007) 212 [hep-ph/0607316]

  12. [12]

    Complete (O_7,O_8) contribution to B -> X_s gamma at order alpha_s^2

    H.M. Asatrian, T. Ewerth, A. Ferroglia, C. Greub and G. Ossola,Complete (O7, O8)contribution toB→X sγat orderα 2 s,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 074006 [1005.5587]

  13. [13]

    NNLO QCD corrections to the B -> X_s gamma matrix elements using interpolation in m_c

    M. Misiak and M. Steinhauser,NNLO QCD corrections to the B→X sγmatrix elements using interpolation inm c,Nucl. Phys. B764(2007) 62 [hep-ph/0609241]

  14. [14]

    Large-m_c Asymptotic Behaviour of O(alpha_s^2) Corrections to B -> X_s gamma

    M. Misiak and M. Steinhauser,Large-m c asymptotic behaviour of theO(α 2 s) corrections to B→X sγ,Nucl. Phys. B840(2010) 271 [1005.1173]

  15. [15]

    Greub, H.M

    C. Greub, H.M. Asatrian, F. Saturnino and C. Wiegand,Specific three-loop contributions to b→sγassociated with the current-current operators,JHEP05 (2023) 201 [2303.01714]

  16. [16]

    M. Fael, F. Lange, K. Sch¨ onwald and M. Steinhauser,Three-loopb→sγvertex with current-current operators,JHEP11(2023) 166 [2309.14706]

  17. [17]

    Czaja, M

    M. Czaja, M. Czakon, T. Huber, M. Misiak, M. Niggetiedt, A. Rehman et al.,The Q1,2–Q7 interference contributions tob→sγatO(α 2 s)for the physical value ofm c, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 1108 [2309.14707]

  18. [18]

    Greub, H.M

    C. Greub, H.M. Asatrian, H.H. Asatryan, L. Born and J. Eicher,Three-loop contributions to b→sγassociated with the current-current operators,JHEP11 (2024) 058 [2407.17270]

  19. [19]

    Three-loop matching of the dipole operators for b -> s gamma and b -> s g

    M. Misiak and M. Steinhauser,Three-loop matching of the dipole operators for b→sγandb→sg,Nucl. Phys. B683(2004) 277 [hep-ph/0401041]

  20. [20]

    Effective Hamiltonian for Non-Leptonic |Delta F| = 1 Decays at NNLO in QCD

    M. Gorbahn and U. Haisch,Effective Hamiltonian for non-leptonic|∆F|= 1 decays at NNLO in QCD,Nucl. Phys. B713(2005) 291 [hep-ph/0411071]

  21. [21]

    Three-Loop Mixing of Dipole Operators

    M. Gorbahn, U. Haisch and M. Misiak,Three-Loop Mixing of Dipole Operators, Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 102004 [hep-ph/0504194]

  22. [22]

    Four-Loop Anomalous Dimensions for Radiative Flavour-Changing Decays

    M. Czakon, U. Haisch and M. Misiak,Four-loop anomalous dimensions for radiative flavour-changing decays,JHEP03(2007) 008 [hep-ph/0612329]

  23. [23]

    Nogueira,Automatic Feynman graph generation,J

    P. Nogueira,Automatic Feynman graph generation,J. Comput. Phys.105(1993) 279

  24. [24]

    FORM version 4.2

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda and J. Vermaseren,FORM version 4.2,1707.06453

  25. [25]

    Davies, T

    J. Davies, T. Kaneko, C. Marinissen, T. Ueda and J.A.M. Vermaseren,FORM Version 5.0,2601.19982

  26. [26]

    Gerlach, F

    M. Gerlach, F. Herren and M. Lang,tapir: A tool for topologies, amplitudes, partial fraction decomposition and input for reductions,Comput. Phys. Commun.282 (2023) 108544 [2201.05618]. – 33 –

  27. [27]

    Complete Corrections of O(\alpha\alpha_s) to the Decay of the Z Boson into Bottom Quarks

    R. Harlander, T. Seidensticker and M. Steinhauser,Corrections ofO(αα s)to the decay of the Z boson into bottom quarks,Phys. Lett. B426(1998) 125 [hep-ph/9712228]

  28. [28]

    T. Seidensticker,Automatic application of successive asymptotic expansions of Feynman diagrams, in6th International Workshop on New Computing Techniques in Physics Research: Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence Neural Nets, Genetic Algorithms, Symbolic Algebra, Automatic Calculation, 5, 1999 [hep-ph/9905298]

  29. [29]

    Group theory factors for Feynman diagrams

    T. van Ritbergen, A.N. Schellekens and J.A.M. Vermaseren,Group theory factors for Feynman diagrams,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A14(1999) 41 [hep-ph/9802376]

  30. [30]

    Maheria,Semi- and Fully-Inclusive Phase-Space Integrals at Four Loops, Ph.D

    V. Maheria,Semi- and Fully-Inclusive Phase-Space Integrals at Four Loops, Ph.D. thesis, Hamburg U., 2022

  31. [31]

    Tkachov,A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,Phys

    F.V. Tkachov,A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,Phys. Lett. B100(1981) 65

  32. [32]

    Chetyrkin and F.V

    K.G. Chetyrkin and F.V. Tkachov,Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops,Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 159

  33. [33]

    High-precision calculation of multi-loop Feynman integrals by difference equations

    S. Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15(2000) 5087 [hep-ph/0102033]

  34. [34]

    Kira - A Feynman Integral Reduction Program

    P. Maierh¨ ofer, J. Usovitsch and P. Uwer,Kira—A Feynman integral reduction program,Comput. Phys. Commun.230(2018) 99 [1705.05610]

  35. [35]

    Klappert, F

    J. Klappert, F. Lange, P. Maierh¨ ofer and J. Usovitsch,Integral reduction with Kira 2.0 and finite field methods,Comput. Phys. Commun.266(2021) 108024 [2008.06494]

  36. [36]

    Lange, J

    F. Lange, J. Usovitsch and Z. Wu,Kira 3: Integral reduction with efficient seeding and optimized equation selection,Comput. Phys. Commun.322(2026) 109999 [2505.20197]

  37. [37]

    Fael and J

    M. Fael and J. Usovitsch,Third order correction to semileptonicb→udecay: Fermionic contributions,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 114026 [2310.03685]

  38. [38]

    Driesse, G.U

    M. Driesse, G.U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and J. Usovitsch, Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 241402 [2403.07781]

  39. [39]

    Klappert and F

    J. Klappert and F. Lange,Reconstructing rational functions with FireFly,Comput. Phys. Commun.247(2020) 106951 [1904.00009]

  40. [40]

    Klappert, S.Y

    J. Klappert, S.Y. Klein and F. Lange,Interpolation of dense and sparse rational functions and other improvements in FireFly,Comput. Phys. Commun.264(2021) 107968 [2004.01463]

  41. [41]

    Kauers,Fast Solvers for Dense Linear Systems,Nucl

    M. Kauers,Fast Solvers for Dense Linear Systems,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.183 (2008) 245. – 34 –

  42. [42]

    A novel approach to integration by parts reduction

    A. von Manteuffel and R.M. Schabinger,A novel approach to integration by parts reduction,Phys. Lett. B744(2015) 101 [1406.4513]

  43. [43]

    Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction

    T. Peraro,Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction,JHEP12(2016) 030 [1608.01902]

  44. [44]

    Smirnov and V.A

    A.V. Smirnov and V.A. Smirnov,How to choose master integrals,Nucl. Phys. B 960(2020) 115213 [2002.08042]

  45. [45]

    Usovitsch,Factorization of denominators in integration-by-parts reductions, 2002.08173

    J. Usovitsch,Factorization of denominators in integration-by-parts reductions, 2002.08173

  46. [46]

    Smirnov and M

    A.V. Smirnov and M. Zeng,FIRE 6.5: Feynman integral reduction with new simplification library,Comput. Phys. Commun.302(2024) 109261 [2311.02370]

  47. [47]

    Kotikov,Differential equations method

    A.V. Kotikov,Differential equations method. New technique for massive Feynman diagram calculation,Phys. Lett. B254(1991) 158

  48. [48]

    Kotikov,Differential equations method: the calculation of vertex-type Feynman diagrams,Phys

    A.V. Kotikov,Differential equations method: the calculation of vertex-type Feynman diagrams,Phys. Lett. B259(1991) 314

  49. [49]

    Kotikov,Differential equation method

    A.V. Kotikov,Differential equation method. The calculation ofN-point Feynman diagrams,Phys. Lett. B267(1991) 123

  50. [50]

    Remiddi,Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,Nuovo Cim

    E. Remiddi,Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,Nuovo Cim. A 110(1997) 1435 [hep-th/9711188]

  51. [51]

    Presenting LiteRed: a tool for the Loop InTEgrals REDuction

    R.N. Lee,Presenting LiteRed: a tool for the Loop InTEgrals REDuction, 1212.2685

  52. [52]

    LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for the reduction of the multiloop integrals

    R.N. Lee,LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.523(2014) 012059 [1310.1145]

  53. [53]

    Automated Solution of First Order Factorizable Systems of Differential Equations in One Variable

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl¨ umlein, P. Marquard, N. Rana and C. Schneider,Automated solution of first order factorizable systems of differential equations in one variable, Nucl. Phys. B939(2019) 253 [1810.12261]

  54. [54]

    Asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals near threshold

    M. Beneke and V.A. Smirnov,Asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals near threshold,Nucl. Phys. B522(1998) 321 [hep-ph/9711391]

  55. [55]

    Smirnov,Analytic tools for Feynman integrals(2012), 10.1007/978-3-642-34886-0

    V.A. Smirnov,Analytic tools for Feynman integrals(2012), 10.1007/978-3-642-34886-0

  56. [56]

    Dubovyk, J

    I. Dubovyk, J. Gluza and G. Somogyi,Mellin-Barnes Integrals: A Primer on Particle Physics Applications(2022), 10.1007/978-3-031-14272-7, [2211.13733]

  57. [57]

    A Systematic and Efficient Method to Compute Multi-loop Master Integrals

    X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma and C.-Y. Wang,A systematic and efficient method to compute multi-loop master integrals,Phys. Lett. B779(2018) 353 [1711.09572]

  58. [58]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,Multiloop corrections for collider processes using auxiliary mass flow,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L051503 [2107.01864]

  59. [59]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    Z.-F. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,Determining Feynman Integrals with Only Input from Linear Algebra,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 222001 [2201.11637]. – 35 –

  60. [60]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via auxiliary mass flow,Comput. Phys. Commun.283(2023) 108565 [2201.11669]

  61. [61]

    Ferguson, D.H

    H.R.P. Ferguson, D.H. Bailey and S. Arno,Analysis of PSLQ, an integer relation finding algorithm,Mathematics of Computation68(1999) 351

  62. [62]

    Introduction to the GiNaC Framework for Symbolic Computation within the C++ Programming Language

    C. Bauer, A. Frink and R. Kreckel,Introduction to the GiNaC Framework for Symbolic Computation within the C++ Programming Language,J. Symb. Comput. 33(2002) 1 [cs/0004015]

  63. [63]

    Numerical evaluation of multiple polylogarithms

    J. Vollinga and S. Weinzierl,Numerical evaluation of multiple polylogarithms, Comput. Phys. Commun.167(2005) 177 [hep-ph/0410259]

  64. [64]

    Harmonic sums, Mellin transforms and Integrals

    J.A.M. Vermaseren,Harmonic sums, Mellin transforms and integrals,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A14(1999) 2037 [hep-ph/9806280]

  65. [65]

    Harmonic Sums and Mellin Transforms up to two-loop Order

    J. Bl¨ umlein and S. Kurth,Harmonic sums and Mellin transforms up to two-loop order,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 014018 [hep-ph/9810241]

  66. [66]

    Structural Relations of Harmonic Sums and Mellin Transforms up to Weight w = 5

    J. Bl¨ umlein,Structural relations of harmonic sums and Mellin transforms up to weightw= 5,Comput. Phys. Commun.180(2009) 2218 [0901.3106]

  67. [67]

    A Computer Algebra Toolbox for Harmonic Sums Related to Particle Physics

    J. Ablinger,A Computer Algebra Toolbox for Harmonic Sums Related to Particle Physics, Master’s thesis, Linz U., 2009, [1011.1176]

  68. [68]

    Harmonic Sums and Polylogarithms Generated by Cyclotomic Polynomials

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl¨ umlein and C. Schneider,Harmonic sums and polylogarithms generated by cyclotomic polynomials,J. Math. Phys.52(2011) 102301 [1105.6063]

  69. [69]

    Ablinger,Computer Algebra Algorithms for Special Functions in Particle Physics, Ph.D

    J. Ablinger,Computer Algebra Algorithms for Special Functions in Particle Physics, Ph.D. thesis, Linz U., 2012.1305.0687

  70. [70]

    Generalized Harmonic, Cyclotomic, and Binomial Sums, their Polylogarithms and Special Numbers

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl¨ umlein and C. Schneider,Generalized Harmonic, Cyclotomic, and Binomial Sums, their Polylogarithms and Special Numbers,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.523 (2014) 012060 [1310.5645]

  71. [71]

    Analytic and Algorithmic Aspects of Generalized Harmonic Sums and Polylogarithms

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl¨ umlein and C. Schneider,Analytic and algorithmic aspects of generalized harmonic sums and polylogarithms,J. Math. Phys.54(2013) 082301 [1302.0378]

  72. [72]

    Iterated Binomial Sums and their Associated Iterated Integrals

    J. Ablinger, J. Bl¨ umlein, C.G. Raab and C. Schneider,Iterated binomial sums and their associated iterated integrals,J. Math. Phys.55(2014) 112301 [1407.1822]

  73. [73]

    The package HarmonicSums: Computer Algebra and Analytic aspects of Nested Sums

    J. Ablinger,The package HarmonicSums: Computer Algebra and Analytic Aspects of Nested Sums,PoSLL2014(2014) 019 [1407.6180]

  74. [74]

    Discovering and Proving Infinite Binomial Sums Identities

    J. Ablinger,Discovering and Proving Infinite Binomial Sums Identities,Exper. Math.26(2016) 62 [1507.01703]

  75. [75]

    Computing the Inverse Mellin Transform of Holonomic Sequences using Kovacic's Algorithm

    J. Ablinger,Computing the Inverse Mellin Transform of Holonomic Sequences using Kovacic’s Algorithm,PoSRADCOR2017(2018) 001 [1801.01039]

  76. [76]

    Schneider,Symbolic summation assists combinatorics,Seminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire56(2007) 1

    C. Schneider,Symbolic summation assists combinatorics,Seminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire56(2007) 1. – 36 –

  77. [77]

    Schneider,Term Algebras, Canonical Representations and Difference Ring Theory for Symbolic Summation, inAnti-Differentiation and the Calculation of Feynman Amplitudes, J

    C. Schneider,Term Algebras, Canonical Representations and Difference Ring Theory for Symbolic Summation, inAnti-Differentiation and the Calculation of Feynman Amplitudes, J. Bl¨ umlein and C. Schneider, eds., (Cham), pp. 423–485, Springer International Publishing (2021), DOI [2102.01471]

  78. [78]

    Ancillary files at:https://www.ttp.kit.edu/preprints/2026/ttp26-007/

  79. [79]

    Harmonic Polylogarithms

    E. Remiddi and J.A.M. Vermaseren,Harmonic polylogarithms,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15(2000) 725 [hep-ph/9905237]

  80. [80]

    The Multiple Zeta Value Data Mine

    J. Bl¨ umlein, D.J. Broadhurst and J.A.M. Vermaseren,The Multiple Zeta Value data mine,Comput. Phys. Commun.181(2010) 582 [0907.2557]

Showing first 80 references.