Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Discerning ground state and photoemission-induced spin textures in altermagnetic $\alpha$-MnTe

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read SARPES signals in altermagnet MnTe split into texture and artifact

desk verdict A useful, transferable rule for separating ground-state from matrix-element spin textures in altermagnet SARPES, but the calculation's surface termination mismatch leaves the central confirmation shakier than the text suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.16635 v2 pith:VTQEUWVE submitted 2026-03-17 cond-mat.str-el

D.A. Usanov , S.W. D'Souza , A. Dal Din , J. Krempaský , F. Guo , O.J. Amin , C. Polley , M. Leandersson
show 7 more authors
G. Carbone B. Thiagarajan T. Jungwirth L. Šmejkal J. Minár P. Wadley J.H. Dil
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords altermagnetismα-MnTeSARPESspintexturematrixelementeffectsone-stepphotoemissionliftedKramersdegeneracyd-wavepolarization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes an interpretive rule for spin-resolved photoemission (SARPES) on the altermagnetic semiconductor α-MnTe: any out-of-plane spin polarization that is antisymmetric with respect to the Γ point is purely a photoemission artifact, while the symmetric part measured with s-polarized light reflects the ground-state spin texture. Using one-step photoemission calculations, the authors identify a region of momentum and binding energy where matrix element effects are minimal, and show that spin-resolved measurements on field-cooled, domain-imbalanced samples display a symmetric spin signal there that matches the calculated ground-state d-wave-like out-of-plane polarization on the kz=0 nodal plane. If correct, this provides experimental confirmation of the spin-orbit-induced lifted Kramers spin degeneracy in an altermagnet and a general method for separating intrinsic from photoemission-induced spin textures in such materials.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the symmetry decomposition rule derived from fully relativistic one-step photoemission calculations: within the kz=0 nodal plane, any Sz spin polarization component antisymmetric with respect to Γ is assigned to photoemission matrix element effects, while the symmetric part, for s-polarized light, is assigned to the ground state. The calculations also define a region of interest (k|| > 0.25 Å^-1, EB < 0.5 eV) where matrix element effects are minimal, providing a reliable window for reading ground-state spin polarization in experiments. This rule is applied to interpret spin-resolved EDC measurements on field-cooled samples with imbalanced Néel domains.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be to field-cool the same MnTe film in the opposite direction: the symmetric ground-state contribution should flip sign (since the Néel vector reverses) while the antisymmetric artifact should remain unchanged, and the measured polarization should follow this behavior. Alternatively, repeating the one-step calculation with a Te-terminated surface and comparing the predicted symmetric signal at k||≈0.36 Å^-1 to the measured EDC would directly test whether the attribution survives the termination mismatch.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in SARPES experiments on α-MnTe near the kz=0 nodal plane, the measured Sz spin polarization can be decomposed: a component antisymmetric about Γ arises exclusively from photoemission matrix element effects, while the symmetric component measured with s-polarized light reflects the ground-state spin texture. One-step photoemission calculations support this, and field-cooled measurements at k||≈0.36 Å^-1 show a symmetric spin signal in the expected region, matching calculations and attributed to the predicted d-wave out-of-plane polarization from SOC-induced lifted Kramers degeneracy. Balanced domains and p-polarized light, by contrast, give predominantly ant

Load-bearing premise

The ground-state interpretation of the symmetric spin signal rests on the accuracy of the one-step photoemission calculations, which assume a Mn-terminated surface and specific Hubbard parameters (U=4.80 eV, J=0.80 eV), while the actual MBE films are expected to be Te-terminated; if these matrix element effects are miscalculated, the symmetric signal could be misattributed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • SARPES data from altermagnets can be interpreted by decomposing the measured spin polarization into symmetric and antisymmetric parts; the antisymmetric part never reflects the ground-state texture.
  • The observed symmetric spin signal on field-cooled α-MnTe supports the predicted spin-orbit-induced d-wave-like lifted Kramers spin degeneracy on the kz=0 nodal plane.
  • The identified region of interest tells future experiments precisely where to look for ground-state spin textures, minimizing matrix-element contamination.
  • The coupling between light polarization and Néel vector orientation means that polarization-dependent measurements can be used to sense domain imbalance, and must be accounted for in any altermagnet SARPES study.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this decomposition rule generalizes, SARPES might be used to detect altermagnetic order in candidates lacking field-cooling control, simply by checking for the symmetric ground-state component under s-polarized light.
  • The observed light-induced selective excitation of Néel domains hints at an optical handle for probing or even manipulating domain populations, though the paper does not claim this.
  • A natural extension would be to test the same symmetric/antisymmetric rule for in-plane spin components or on the other nodal planes, where the non-relativistic splitting dominates.
  • The method's reliance on a specific region of interest suggests that a two-dimensional mapping of the symmetric spin signal could map the ground-state texture over the whole Brillouin zone, beyond the few cuts measured here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper addresses how to separate intrinsic ground-state spin textures from photoemission-induced spin polarization in SARPES studies of the altermagnet α-MnTe. Using one-step SPR-KKR photoemission calculations, the authors propose that under s-polarized light, the component of the out-of-plane photoelectron spin polarization that is symmetric about Γ reflects the ground-state spin texture, while the antisymmetric component is purely a matrix-element artifact. They define a region of interest (k||>0.25 Å⁻¹, EB<0.5 eV) where matrix-element contamination is minimal, and they report spin-resolved EDC measurements on field-cooled films at k||≈0.36 Å⁻¹ showing a symmetric spin signal under s-polarized light, which they interpret as evidence for the SOC-induced d-wave-like lifted Kramers spin degeneracy on the kz=0 nodal plane. They also show that p-polarized light suppresses the ground-state signal, consistent with their calculations.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, the paper provides a practical methodology for extracting ground-state spin textures from SARPES in altermagnets and delivers experimental support for the d-wave spin texture in α-MnTe. The main strengths are the use of fully relativistic one-step photoemission calculations that include realistic geometry, multiple scattering, and photon energy; the explicit formulation of a symmetry-based interpretive rule; and the combination of spin-integrated and spin-resolved measurements on both field-cooled and non-field-cooled samples. However, the central attribution is not yet secure because the interpretive rule and the region of interest are derived from a Mn-terminated surface calculation while the measured films are expected to be Te-terminated, and because the key experimental test is performed only on an imbalanced-domain sample without a balanced-domain control in the same momentum region.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV and Sec. II.A] The one-step SPR-KKR calculations are explicitly performed for the Mn-terminated surface of hexagonal MnTe(0001), while the Methods state that the MBE films are expected to be Te-terminated, citing Ref. [4]. At hν≈78 eV the photoelectron kinetic energy (~70 eV) is in the surface-sensitive range, so the spin-dependent matrix elements that generate the photoemission-induced signal depend directly on the termination. The rule that under s-polarized light the symmetric part of Sz is ground-state, and the identification of the ROI with minimal matrix-element contamination (Fig. 8), are both obtained from this Mn-terminated model. If a Te-terminated calculation yields a symmetric matrix-element contribution under s-polarized light or appreciable contamination inside the ROI, the measured symmetric EDC at k||≈0.36 Å⁻¹ would not establish the ground-state texture. The authors should demonstrate
  2. [Sec. II.B.1 and Sec. II.B.2] The balanced-domain case is calculated and predicted to give vanishing ground-state spin polarization at larger momenta, yet the spin-resolved EDC at k||≈0.36 Å⁻¹ that carries the central claim is only shown for the field-cooled (imbalanced) sample. A non-field-cooled, balanced-domain sample measured under identical conditions would provide a calculation-free control: if a symmetric spin signal appears at k||≈0.36 Å⁻¹ in the balanced case, the rule 'symmetric = ground state' would be falsified. The manuscript only reports balanced-domain spin data at small momenta (k||≈0.2 Å⁻¹) and not in the ROI. This control is essential for the central conclusion.
  3. [Sec. II.B.2, Fig. 5] The imbalanced-domain simulation uses an ad hoc domain composition of (24;19;19)% versus (10;14;14)% with an effective imbalance of 0.28, and the comparison to experiment is described qualitatively as 'resembling' the calculated EDCs. No justification is given for these percentages, and no sensitivity analysis is provided to show that the predicted symmetric EDC in the ROI is robust to the choice of domain composition or to the Hubbard parameters U=4.80 eV and J=0.80 eV. Because the calculation already contains the d-wave ground state, the resemblance is partly a result of the model's input rather than an independent confirmation. The authors should quantify the robustness of the symmetric signal in the ROI to these choices.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II.B.1] Typo: 'preformed ARPES measurements' should be 'performed ARPES measurements'.
  2. [Sec. VI.B] Typo: 'deduct the contribution' should be 'deduce the contribution'.
  3. [Sec. II.A and Fig. 2] The text states hν≈80 eV while Fig. 2 and later text use hν=82 eV; please make the values consistent.
  4. [Sec. II.B.2] The statement that spin-resolved EDCs at higher momenta possess the same symmetry is supported only by a supplementary figure; adding the quantitative polarization values and statistical uncertainties for those EDCs would strengthen the claim.
  5. [Sec. VI.A] A rigid 100 meV shift is applied to align calculated and measured bands; the effect of this shift on the extracted spin polarization and the ROI boundaries is not discussed.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Photoemission-induced signal is defined as the antisymmetric part of the signal, making the 'antisymmetric = matrix-element, symmetric = ground state' rule partially self-definitional; the experimental confirmation is consequently less independent than claimed.

  1. self definitional [Sec. VI.B (Supplementary), applied in Sec. II.A]
    "By using the same ground state spectral function, we computed difference in SARPES signal between two opposite incidence angles of the photon beam. ... the difference between these two orientations highlights spectral features, which change sign upon the sample rotation and hence are attributed only to the effect of geometry in matrix elements of photoemission. Noteworthy, this contribution is purely anti-symmetric with respect to the Γ point for the s-polarized light (LV) ... In the special case of s-polarized light, the symmetric part of the spin signal reflects the ground-state properties."

    The 'photoemission-induced' contribution is constructed as S(k) − S(−k), which is antisymmetric under k → −k by definition. Presenting this as the finding that photoemission-induced spin polarization is purely antisymmetric, and then inferring that any antisymmetric measured component is matrix-element-induced while the symmetric part is ground-state, is a definitional split rather than an independently established property. The calculation does not demonstrate that the full matrix-element contribution has zero symmetric part; it only isolates the part that changes sign under rotation. Thus the central rule is imposed by the analysis convention, not tested.

  2. other [Sec. II.B.2 and Sec. III]
    "Since the impact of the matrix element effect has been predicted to be minimal in this region of the Brillouin zone (Fig. 8), the observed polarization signal reflects mostly the ground-state spin texture. Therefore, these data support the concept of the SOC-induced lifted Kramers spin degeneracy in altermagnetic MnTe."

    The ROI (k||>0.25 Å^-1, EB<0.5 eV) and the 'minimal impact' criterion are outputs of the same one-step SPR-KKR calculation that already contains the d-wave LKSD ground state. Using that calculation to certify the measured symmetric EDC as ground-state makes the confirmation self-referential: the model is used to define the region where it is tested and to rule out the dominant alternative (a symmetric matrix-element contribution). An independent test, such as a balanced-domain control at k||≈0.36 Å^-1 where the net ground-state polarization is zero, is not reported.

full rationale

The central interpretive rule — 'antisymmetric = matrix-element, symmetric = ground state under s-polarized light' — is the load-bearing step. It is presented as a result of the one-step calculations, but the supporting calculation (Sec. VI.B) forms the photoemission-induced signal as the difference between opposite azimuthal orientations, i.e. S(k) − S(−k). That quantity is antisymmetric by construction, so finding it 'purely antisymmetric' does not establish that the full matrix-element contribution is antisymmetric; it only defines the antisymmetric subspace. The conclusion that a symmetric measured EDC reflects the ground state therefore follows in part from the analysis convention, not from an independent falsifiable test. This is a genuine self-definitional component, although not a complete reduction: the experiment could in principle have shown no symmetric signal in the ROI, and the balanced-domain simulations add some content. The second issue is that the ROI and the 'minimal matrix-element impact' are computed with the same model that contains the d-wave ground state and is then used to certify the measured signal; the confirmation is therefore not fully independent. Self-citations to [7] and [27] (largely overlapping authors) supply the d-wave LKSD premise, but the paper's own new SARPES data and calculations carry independent content, so this is not a pure self-citation chain. Overall, the central claim is partially built into the analysis convention, but the result is not simply equivalent to its inputs by construction; score 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The reader pays for the one-step photoemission formalism, the prior-established d-wave ground state, the field-cooling imbalance premise, and the incoherent-domain summation. The free parameters are the Hubbard U/J values, the 100 meV rigid shift, and the chosen domain composition — the last is the one that converts a qualitative symmetry argument into a quantitative 'resemblance' with the measured EDCs. No invented entities.

free parameters (4)
  • LSDA+U Hubbard parameters U, J for Mn 3d (SPR-KKR) = U = 4.80 eV, J = 0.80 eV
    Text states they 'were chosen' (§IV); they set the size of the SOC-induced d-wave splitting and the magnitude of the spin signals the rule interprets.
  • Rigid band shift between calculation and experiment = 100 meV
    Applied to align calculated bands with the p-doped experimental Fermi level (SI VI A); a fit to the measured dispersion.
  • Multi-domain composition in the imbalanced simulation = (24;19;19)% ground state 1 vs (10;14;14)% ground state 2; imbalance 0.28
    Chosen domain population used to produce the 'predicted' symmetric EDCs compared with the field-cooled measurement (§II.B.2); not independently measured.
  • Photon energy offset between calculation and measurement = 82 eV calculated vs 78 eV experimental
    Both are taken to sit at the kz=0 nodal plane; the offset is a calibration choice that can shift final-state and hence matrix-element behavior (§II.A, Fig. 2 caption).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption One-step photoemission model (relativistic Pendry formalism, SPR-KKR) correctly captures spin-dependent matrix elements for MnTe(0001)
    The entire antisymmetric/symmetric rule and the ROI definition are extracted from these calculations (§II.A, Fig. 2, Fig. 8); if the model is wrong, the rule and its application to the data fail.
  • domain assumption Ground state of α-MnTe carries the SOC-induced d-wave-like out-of-plane spin texture at kz=0, with orientation set by the Néel vector
    Taken as given from altermagnet theory and prior work [1,2,7]; this is the object the paper aims to observe by photoemission (Fig. 1).
  • domain assumption Field cooling of the un-patterned film creates only an imbalance between opposite Néel domains, not a single domain
    Adopted from [4]; the interpretation of the measured symmetric signal as ground-state texture rests on this (§II.B.2).
  • domain assumption Photocurrent from a multi-domain sample is the incoherent sum over domain orientations
    Explicit summation procedure in §IV; no interference between domains is considered.
  • domain assumption Near-EF bands of α-MnTe are dominated by Te p orbitals along the c-axis
    Used when comparing measured linear dichroism with dipole selection rules (§II.B).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Discerning ground state and photoemission-induced spin textures in altermagnetic $\alpha$-MnTe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VTQEUWVE

@misc{pith2026260316635,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Discerning ground state and photoemission-induced spin textures in altermagnetic $\alpha$-MnTe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VTQEUWVE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.16635}
}
abstract

The recently discovered class of altermagnets provide a physical realization of an unconventional compensated magnetic phase with a higher partial-wave type of ordering, reminiscent of unconventional superfluid phases. Their stability under normal conditions has sparked significant research interest, spanning fields from spintronics to topological and correlated quantum materials. Spin- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (SARPES) has great promise to resolve the momentum-dependent spin textures, which are intricately interweaved with the altermagnetic direct space spin order. Using the relativistic $d$-wave-like collinear spin polarization on one of the non-relativistic nodal surfaces of the altermagnetic band structure of $\alpha$-MnTe as an example, we here identify and resolve the challenges associated with (S)ARPES studies on altermagnets. We focus particularly on the role of photoemission-induced electron polarization and the coupling between light and the N\'eel vector of a magnetic domain. Our findings reveal an atypical behaviour of photoemission selection rules while using linearly-polarized light. Our methods allow to distinguish polarization of photoelectrons originating from the sample's ground state spin texture, on one hand, and from the photoemission process, on the other hand. Our experimental results are supported by a combination of ab initio band-structure and 1-step photoemission calculations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.16635 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic representation of 2D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Calculated SARPES maps of the out-of-plane spin polarization at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Constant energy slices (100 meV integration) from the photon energy scan at (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a)-(d) Constant energy maps 100 meV below [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. SARPES 1-step calculations and measurements for the balanced (a) an imbalanced (b)-(d) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Same as fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Measured (a-d) and 1-step calculated (e-h) spin-integrated band maps for the fully [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Bandmaps of spin polarization arising from the photoemission process for differently ori [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Constant energy cuts of circular integrated (a) and circular dichroic (b) signal from a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. SARPES data in more detail: spin-resolved EDCs and their angular position illustrated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Magnetically tunable symmetry-enforced nodal lines producing huge anomalous Hall conductivity in altermagnetic $\alpha$-MnTe

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Two symmetry-enforced nodal lines in the valence bands of alpha-MnTe are identified as the source of its large anomalous Hall conductivity, with magnetic tunability via spin canting.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [4]

    Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry.Physical Review X, 12(3):031042, 2022

    Libor Šmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth. Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry.Physical Review X, 12(3):031042, 2022

    2022

  2. [1]

    First, photon energy, and thusk z scans in the range betweenhν= 19to82eV were measured in order to locate thek z = 0nodal planes

    Balanced domain configuration We have preformed ARPES measurements on non-field-cooled samples in the VUV range with and without spin resolution. First, photon energy, and thusk z scans in the range betweenhν= 19to82eV were measured in order to locate thek z = 0nodal planes. In this region of reciprocal space, the relativistic spin splitting does not risk...

  3. [2]

    magnetization

    Imbalanced domain configuration In order to get access to ground-state-related spin polarization, an imbalance in the domain population should be created. In our case, we employed so-called field cooling - cooling down the sample from a paramagnetic state in presence of static out-of-plane magnetic field [4]. In this section we will present the results ob...

  4. [3]

    Symmetry, microscopy and spectroscopy signatures of altermagnetism.Nature, 649(8098):837–847, 2026

    Tomas Jungwirth, Jairo Sinova, Rafael M Fernandes, Qihang Liu, Hikaru Watanabe, Shuichi Murakami, Satoru Nakatsuji, and Libor Šmejkal. Symmetry, microscopy and spectroscopy signatures of altermagnetism.Nature, 649(8098):837–847, 2026

    2026

  5. [5]

    Emerging research landscape of altermag- netism.Physical Review X, 12(4):040501, 2022

    Libor Šmejkal, Jairo Sinova, and Tomas Jungwirth. Emerging research landscape of altermag- netism.Physical Review X, 12(4):040501, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Buffer-layer-controlled nickeline vs zinc-blende/wurtzite-type mnte growths on c-plane al 2 o 3 substrates.Physical Review Materials, 8(1):014203, 2024

    Deepti Jain, Hee Taek Yi, Alessandro R Mazza, Kim Kisslinger, Myung-Geun Han, Matthew Brahlek, and Seongshik Oh. Buffer-layer-controlled nickeline vs zinc-blende/wurtzite-type mnte growths on c-plane al 2 o 3 substrates.Physical Review Materials, 8(1):014203, 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Nanoscale imaging and control of altermagnetism in mnte

    OJ Amin, A Dal Din, E Golias, Y Niu, A Zakharov, SC Fromage, CJB Fields, SL Heywood, RB Cousins, F Maccherozzi, et al. Nanoscale imaging and control of altermagnetism in mnte. Nature, 636(8042):348–353, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    We emphasize that 180o azimuthal rotation of the sample is not the same as flipping the Néel vector, since the first one does not change the ground-state spin polarization of the band structure, but the second one causes a sign flip ofSz. The SARPES signal presented below originates from the geometrical contribution of matrix element effects and will be a...

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    The mn-te (manganese-tellurium) system.Journal of phase equilibria, 19(6):591–596, 1998

    Mark E Schlesinger. The mn-te (manganese-tellurium) system.Journal of phase equilibria, 19(6):591–596, 1998

    1998

  2. [10]

    Altermagneticliftingofkramersspindegeneracy

    Juraj Krempask` y, L Šmejkal, SW D’souza, M Hajlaoui, G Springholz, K Uhlířová, F Alarab, PCConstantinou, VStrocov, DUsanov, etal. Altermagneticliftingofkramersspindegeneracy. Nature, 626(7999):517–522, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Observation of a giant band splitting in altermagnetic mnte

    T Osumi, S Souma, T Aoyama, K Yamauchi, A Honma, K Nakayama, T Takahashi, Kenya Ohgushi, and Takafumi Sato. Observation of a giant band splitting in altermagnetic mnte. Physical Review B, 109(11):115102, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Broken kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic mnte.Physical review letters, 132(3):036702, 2024

    Suyoung Lee, Sangjae Lee, Saegyeol Jung, Jiwon Jung, Donghan Kim, Yeonjae Lee, Byeongjun Seok, Jaeyoung Kim, Byeong Gyu Park, Libor Šmejkal, et al. Broken kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic mnte.Physical review letters, 132(3):036702, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Temperature dependence of relativistic valence band splitting 21 induced by an altermagnetic phase transition.Advanced Materials, 36(31):2314076, 2024

    Mahdi Hajlaoui, Sunil Wilfred D’Souza, Libor Šmejkal, Dominik Kriegner, Gauthier Krizman, Tetiana Zakusylo, Natalia Olszowska, Ondřej Caha, Jan Michalička, Jaime Sánchez-Barriga, Alberto Marmodoro, Karel Výborný, Arthur Ernst, Mirko Cinchetti, Jan Minar, Tomas Jung- wirth, and...

    2024

  6. [14]

    Magnetization sym- metry for the mnte altermagnetic candidate.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11876, 2025

    NN Orlova, VD Esin, AV Timonina, NN Kolesnikov, and EV Deviatov. Magnetization sym- metry for the mnte altermagnetic candidate.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11876, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Crossover from relativistic to non- relativistic net magnetization for mnte altermagnet candidate.JETP Letters, 120(5):360–366, 2024

    Nadezhda Nikolaevna Orlova, Artem Aleksandrovich Avakyants, Anna Vladimirovna Timo- nina, Nikolay Nikolaevich Kolesnikov, and EV Deviatov. Crossover from relativistic to non- relativistic net magnetization for mnte altermagnet candidate.JETP Letters, 120(5):360–366, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Giant strain-induced spin splitting effect in mnte, ag-wave altermagnetic semiconductor.Physical Review Letters, 134(8):086701, 2025

    KD Belashchenko. Giant strain-induced spin splitting effect in mnte, ag-wave altermagnetic semiconductor.Physical Review Letters, 134(8):086701, 2025

    2025

  9. [17]

    Dichotomous temperature response in the electronic structure of epitaxially grown altermagnet mnte.Nano Letters, 2025

    Ji-Eun Lee, Yong Zhong, Qile Li, Mark T Edmonds, Zhi-Xun Shen, Choongyu Hwang, and Sung-Kwan Mo. Dichotomous temperature response in the electronic structure of epitaxially grown altermagnet mnte.Nano Letters, 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    Exchange-mediated magnetic blue-shift of the band-gap energy in the antiferromagnetic semiconductor mnte.New Journal of Physics, 22(8):083029, 2020

    Davide Bossini, Marc Terschanski, Fabian Mertens, Gunther Springholz, Alberta Bonanni, Götz S Uhrig, and Mirko Cinchetti. Exchange-mediated magnetic blue-shift of the band-gap energy in the antiferromagnetic semiconductor mnte.New Journal of Physics, 22(8):083029, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Multiple-stable anisotropic magnetoresistance memory in anti- ferromagnetic mnte.Nature communications, 7(1):11623, 2016

    Dominik Kriegner, K V` yborn` y, K Olejník, H Reichlová, V Novák, X Marti, J Gazquez, V Saidl, P Němec, VV Volobuev, et al. Multiple-stable anisotropic magnetoresistance memory in anti- ferromagnetic mnte.Nature communications, 7(1):11623, 2016

    2016

  12. [20]

    Spontaneous anomalous hall effect arising from an unconventional compensated magnetic phase in a semiconductor.Physical Review Letters, 130(3):036702, 2023

    RD Gonzalez Betancourt, Jan Zubáč, R Gonzalez-Hernandez, Kevin Geishendorf, Zbynek Šobáň, Gunther Springholz, Kamil Olejník, Libor Šmejkal, Jairo Sinova, Tomas Jungwirth, et al. Spontaneous anomalous hall effect arising from an unconventional compensated magnetic phase in a se...

    2023

  13. [21]

    X-ray magnetic circular dichroism in altermagneticα-mnte

    A Hariki, A Dal Din, OJ Amin, T Yamaguchi, A Badura, D Kriegner, KW Edmonds, RP Cam- pion, P Wadley, D Backes, et al. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism in altermagneticα-mnte. Physical Review Letters, 132(17):176701, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Circulardichroisminresonantinelastic x-ray scattering: Probing altermagnetic domains in mnte.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10809, 2025

    D Takegami, T Aoyama, T Okauchi, T Yamaguchi, S Tippireddy, S Agrestini, M García- Fernández, TMizokawa, KOhgushi, Ke-JinZhou, etal. Circulardichroisminresonantinelastic x-ray scattering: Probing altermagnetic domains in mnte.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10809, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Circular dichroism in resonant photoelectron diffraction as a direct probe of 22 sublattice magnetization in altermagnets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08380, 2025

    Peter Krüger. Circular dichroism in resonant photoelectron diffraction as a direct probe of 22 sublattice magnetization in altermagnets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08380, 2025

    2025

  16. [24]

    Templates for magnetic symmetry and altermagnetism in hexagonal mnte.Physical Review B, 108(17):174437, 2023

    SW Lovesey, DD Khalyavin, and G Van Der Laan. Templates for magnetic symmetry and altermagnetism in hexagonal mnte.Physical Review B, 108(17):174437, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    Determination of the néel vector in rutile altermagnets through x-ray magnetic circular dichroism: The case of mnf 2.Physical Review B, 110(10):L100402, 2024

    A Hariki, T Okauchi, Y Takahashi, and J Kuneš. Determination of the néel vector in rutile altermagnets through x-ray magnetic circular dichroism: The case of mnf 2.Physical Review B, 110(10):L100402, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Anomalous hall antiferromagnets.Nature Reviews Materials, 7(6):482–496, 2022

    Libor Šmejkal, Allan H MacDonald, Jairo Sinova, Satoru Nakatsuji, and Tomas Jungwirth. Anomalous hall antiferromagnets.Nature Reviews Materials, 7(6):482–496, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Present and future trends in spin arpes.Europhysics Letters, 134(5):57001, 2021

    Chiu-Yun Lin, Luca Moreschini, and Alessandra Lanzara. Present and future trends in spin arpes.Europhysics Letters, 134(5):57001, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Recent trends in spin-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 29(48):483001, 2017

    Taichi Okuda. Recent trends in spin-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 29(48):483001, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    Spin-and angle-resolved photoemission on topological materials.Electronic Struc- ture, 1(2):023001, 2019

    J Hugo Dil. Spin-and angle-resolved photoemission on topological materials.Electronic Struc- ture, 1(2):023001, 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Unconventional relativistic spin polarization of electronic bands in an altermagnet.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.01690, 2025

    A Dal Din, DA Usanov, L Šmejkal, SW D’Souza, F Guo, OJ Amin, EM Dawa, RP Campion, KW Edmonds, B Kiraly, et al. Unconventional relativistic spin polarization of electronic bands in an altermagnet.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.01690, 2025

    2025

  23. [31]

    An experimentalist’s guide to the matrix element in angle resolved photoemis- sion.Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 214:29–52, 2017

    Simon Moser. An experimentalist’s guide to the matrix element in angle resolved photoemis- sion.Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 214:29–52, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    UlrichHeinzmannandJHugoDil. Spin–orbit-inducedphotoelectronspinpolarizationinangle- resolved photoemission from both atomic and condensed matter targets.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 24(17):173001, 2012

    2012

  25. [33]

    Interference of spin states in photoemission from sb/ag (111) surface alloys.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 23(7):072207, 2011

    Fabian Meier, Vladimir Petrov, Hossein Mirhosseini, Luc Patthey, Jürgen Henk, Jürg Oster- walder, and J Hugo Dil. Interference of spin states in photoemission from sb/ag (111) surface alloys.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 23(7):072207, 2011

    2011

  26. [34]

    Spin polarization and attosecond time delay in photoemission from spin degenerate states of solids.Physical review letters, 118(6):067402, 2017

    Mauro Fanciulli, Henrieta Volfová, Stefan Muff, Jürgen Braun, Hubert Ebert, Jan Minár, Ul- rich Heinzmann, and J Hugo Dil. Spin polarization and attosecond time delay in photoemission from spin degenerate states of solids.Physical review letters, 118(6):067402, 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    Direct observa- tion of spin-polarized bulk bands in an inversion-symmetric semiconductor.Nature Physics, 23 10(11):835–839, 2014

    Jonathon Mark Riley, F Mazzola, M Dendzik, M Michiardi, T Takayama, Lewis Bawden, C Granerød, Mats Leandersson, T Balasubramanian, M Hoesch, et al. Direct observa- tion of spin-polarized bulk bands in an inversion-symmetric semiconductor.Nature Physics, 23 10(11):835–839, 2014

    2014

  28. [36]

    Non-altermagnetic spin texture in mnte.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.02447, 2025

    Meng Zeng, Pengfei Liu, Ming-Yuan Zhu, Naifu Zheng, Xiang-Rui Liu, Yu-Peng Zhu, Tian- Hao Shao, Yu-Jie Hao, Xiao-Ming Ma, Gexing Qu, et al. Non-altermagnetic spin texture in mnte.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.02447, 2025

    2025

  29. [37]

    PhD thesis, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Graduate School, Seoul National University, 2024

    Suyoung Lee.Investigations on the electronic structures of magnetic transition metal chalco- genides. PhD thesis, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Graduate School, Seoul National University, 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Itinerant and correlated nature of altermag- netic mnte single crystal studied by photoemission and inverse-photoemission spectroscopies

    Kazi Golam Martuza, Yogendra Kumar, Hiroshi Yamaguchi, Shiv Kumar, Masashi Arita, Hi- toshi Sato, Shin-ichiro Ideta, and Kenya Shimada. Itinerant and correlated nature of altermag- netic mnte single crystal studied by photoemission and inverse-photoemission spectroscopies. Mat...

    2025

  31. [39]

    Circular dichroism and spin polarization in photoemission from adsorbates and non-magnetic solids.Physica Scripta, 1990(T31):255–275, 1990

    Gerd Schönhense. Circular dichroism and spin polarization in photoemission from adsorbates and non-magnetic solids.Physica Scripta, 1990(T31):255–275, 1990

    1990

  32. [40]

    PhD thesis, EPFL, Lausanne, 2025

    Usanov Dmitrii.Spin-resolved electron spectroscopy: towards new instrumentation and uncon- ventional magnetism. PhD thesis, EPFL, Lausanne, 2025

    2025

  33. [41]

    Magnetic anisotropy in antiferromagnetic hexagonal mnte

    D Kriegner, H Reichlova, J Grenzer, W Schmidt, E Ressouche, J Godinho, T Wagner, SY Mar- tin, AB Shick, VV Volobuev, et al. Magnetic anisotropy in antiferromagnetic hexagonal mnte. Physical Review B, 96(21):214418, 2017

    2017

  34. [42]

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set.Physical review B, 54(16):11169, 1996

    Georg Kresse and Jürgen Furthmüller. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set.Physical review B, 54(16):11169, 1996

    1996

  35. [43]

    Generalized gradient approximation made simple.Physical review letters, 77(18):3865, 1996

    John P Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof. Generalized gradient approximation made simple.Physical review letters, 77(18):3865, 1996

    1996

  36. [44]

    Theory of photoemission.Surface Science, 57(2):679–705, 1976

    JB Pendry. Theory of photoemission.Surface Science, 57(2):679–705, 1976

    1976

  37. [45]

    Calculation of photoemission spectra for surfaces of solids.Computer Physics Communications, 19(1):69–92, 1980

    JFL Hopkinson, JB Pendry, and DJ Titterington. Calculation of photoemission spectra for surfaces of solids.Computer Physics Communications, 19(1):69–92, 1980

    1980

  38. [46]

    Low-energy electron diffraction

    John Brian Pendry. Low-energy electron diffraction. InInteraction of Atoms and Molecules with Solid Surfaces, pages 201–211. Springer, 1974

    1974

  39. [47]

    The munich spr-kkr package, 2012

    H Ebert et al. The munich spr-kkr package, 2012

    2012

  40. [48]

    Calculating condensed matter properties using the kkr-green’s function method—recent developments and applications.Reports on Progress in Physics, 74(9):096501, aug 2011

    H Ebert, D Ködderitzsch, and J Minár. Calculating condensed matter properties using the kkr-green’s function method—recent developments and applications.Reports on Progress in Physics, 74(9):096501, aug 2011. 24

    2011

  41. [49]

    Probing bulk electronic structure with hard x-ray angle- resolved photoemission.Nature materials, 10(10):759–764, 2011

    AX Gray, C Papp, Shigenori Ueda, B Balke, Y Yamashita, L Plucinski, J Minár, J Braun, ER Ylvisaker, CM Schneider, et al. Probing bulk electronic structure with hard x-ray angle- resolved photoemission.Nature materials, 10(10):759–764, 2011

    2011

  42. [50]

    A program for calculation of the reflection and transmission of electrons through a surface potential barrier.Computer Physics Communications, 19(2):263– 270, 1980

    G Malmström and J Rundgren. A program for calculation of the reflection and transmission of electrons through a surface potential barrier.Computer Physics Communications, 19(2):263– 270, 1980

    1980

  43. [51]

    The theory of angle-resolved ultraviolet photoemission and its applications to ordered materials.Reports on Progress in Physics, 59(10):1267–1338, 1996

    J Braun. The theory of angle-resolved ultraviolet photoemission and its applications to ordered materials.Reports on Progress in Physics, 59(10):1267–1338, 1996

    1996

  44. [52]

    Correlation, temperature and disorder: Recent developments in the one-step description of angle-resolved photoemission.Physics Reports, 740:1–34, 2018

    Jürgen Braun, Ján Minár, and Hubert Ebert. Correlation, temperature and disorder: Recent developments in the one-step description of angle-resolved photoemission.Physics Reports, 740:1–34, 2018

    2018

  45. [53]

    The bloch beamline at max iv: Micro-spot arpes from a conventional, full-featured beamline.Synchrotron Radiation News, 37(4):18–23, 2024

    CMPolley, MLeandersson, JAdell, JOsiecki, DCarbone, KAli, HFedderwitz, andTBalasub- ramanian. The bloch beamline at max iv: Micro-spot arpes from a conventional, full-featured beamline.Synchrotron Radiation News, 37(4):18–23, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    Franck Vidal, M Marangolo, P Torelli, M Eddrief, M Mulazzi, and G Panaccione. Circular dichroism in photoemission as a fingerprint of surface band structure: The case of znse (001)-c (2×2).Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 76(8):081302, 2007. 25

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.