Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Adding Planck polarization channels to SZ map-making cuts the Galactic dust residual correlation by roughly 40 percent.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 17:56 UTC pith:ZHWWBLNZ

load-bearing objection A solid method paper with a clean analytic core, but the headline 40% foreground reduction is not yet nailed down — no error bars and a real risk of ILC overfitting in the cross-spectrum. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2603.17799 v2 pith:ZHWWBLNZ submitted 2026-03-18 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

Enhanced foreground mitigation in thermal SZ Compton-y maps via polarization and deprojection

Jyothis Chandran , Mathieu Remazeilles , R. B. Barreiro This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords Sunyaev-Zeldovich effectCompton-y mapneedlet ILCpolarizationGalactic foregroundscosmic infrared backgroundPlanck PR4component separation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to show that residual Galactic contamination in thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich (tSZ) Compton-y maps can be substantially reduced by feeding polarization maps into the component-separation step, not just temperature maps. The idea is that Galactic dust and synchrotron are polarized and their temperature and polarization patterns are correlated, whereas the tSZ signal is unpolarized; a hybrid needlet internal linear combination (NILC) can exploit that correlation to subtract foregrounds without touching the SZ signal. Applying the hybrid pipeline to Planck PR4 data yields a y-map whose cross-correlation with the IRAS 100 micron dust tracer is about 40 percent lower than the standard temperature-only NILC map, and simulations indicate the gain grows as instrumental noise falls. A companion selective deprojection of cosmic infrared background moments within the same framework reduces small-scale CIB contamination while limiting the noise penalty. Cleaner y-maps matter because they directly sharpen cluster detection, y-map power-spectrum analyses, and cross-correlations with large-scale-structure tracers.

Core claim

The central claim is that adding Stokes Q and U frequency channels as auxiliary inputs to a Needlet Internal Linear Combination (NILC) reconstructing the thermal SZ Compton-y parameter suppresses residual Galactic foregrounds while preserving the unpolarized tSZ signal. Because thermal dust and synchrotron emission have intrinsic temperature-polarization correlations, the polarization channels carry information about the foregrounds contaminating the temperature channels; the hybrid ILC weights use the temperature-polarization cross-covariance to subtract correlated contamination, and the variance-suppression factor shows that residual foreground variance shrinks by an amount controlled by t

What carries the argument

The central object is the multi-Stokes Hybrid ILC (and its constrained variant), a needlet-domain linear combination that includes total-intensity frequency maps as signal channels and Stokes Q/U polarization maps as auxiliary channels. The tSZ SED vector is set to zero in the polarization block so the unpolarized signal is preserved, while the weights exploit measured TE/TB correlations of dust and synchrotron to subtract foregrounds, with the variance reduction governed by the temperature-polarization correlation matrix. For CIB, the key mechanism is deprojection of specific moments of a Taylor-expanded modified-blackbody CIB SED within a Constrained ILC, applied selectively in needlet ban

Load-bearing premise

The 40% figure is interpreted through the y x IRAS cross-spectrum, which assumes IRAS 100 micron emission traces the same Galactic dust that pollutes the y-map, with CIB and tSZ correlations negligible, and that the extra polarization channels are not subtracting real SZ signal through ILC bias.

What would settle it

Cross-correlate the TQU y-map with an external X-ray cluster catalogue: if the SZ flux of known clusters drops by tens of percent relative to the T-only map, the reduced IRAS correlation is signal loss rather than foreground cleaning. Alternatively, recompute the y x IRAS cross-spectrum on a high-latitude mask where CIB, not Galactic dust, dominates: if the 40% reduction persists, the IRAS-based attribution to Galactic foregrounds is weakened.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The PR4 TQU y-map is a lower-variance all-sky SZ map than the standard T-only PR4 NILC map, with roughly 40% less correlation with the Galactic dust tracer while recovering the same cluster signal.
  • Future high-sensitivity surveys, comparable to a 25-fold sensitivity improvement over Planck, should see the Galactic foreground suppression grow to roughly a quarter of the residual power, making polarization-assisted NILC a natural default for SZ map-making.
  • Scale-selective CIB moment deprojection, in particular deprojecting the first-order temperature moment at small angular scales, suppresses small-scale CIB contamination with little large-scale noise penalty.
  • The reconfigured y-maps, including half-ring splits, are made public, enabling direct use in cluster counts, y-power-spectrum cosmology, and cross-correlations with lensing or galaxy surveys.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 40% reduction holds up, cosmological analyses that cross-correlate y-maps with galaxy or lensing surveys at low multipoles should see reduced contamination-driven systematics, potentially tightening constraints on sigma8 and Omega_m beyond what the paper demonstrates.
  • The same hybrid logic should apply to separating kinetic SZ from CMB anisotropies, since kSZ is unpolarized while the CMB is polarized; a similar variance-suppression factor should appear there.
  • The paper's empirical band selection for CIB deprojection could be automated with an explicit cost function; at higher sensitivity this could yield a nearly parameter-free optimal y-map.
  • Because real PR4 data show stronger temperature-polarization correlations than the simulations do, the 40% data-level figure and the smaller simulated gains are not directly comparable; a simulation campaign with more realistic polarized dust templates would test whether the data-level gain is robust.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper extends the needlet ILC framework for thermal SZ y-map reconstruction in two directions. First, it introduces a 'Hybrid NILC' that combines Planck PR4 total-intensity channels with Stokes Q/U polarization channels, exploiting the TE/TB correlations of Galactic dust and synchrotron to reduce foreground residuals while preserving the unpolarized tSZ signal via a null constraint. The analytic derivation shows that the residual variance is reduced by a factor governed by the T-P correlation matrix (Eq. 2.18), with the tSZ variance term preserved in the ideal covariance model (Eq. 2.24). In Planck-like and low-noise (LiteBIRD-like) simulations, the TQU map shows lower total and Galactic-residual power, with the effect increasing at high sensitivity; a null test confirms that the mechanism requires T-P correlated foregrounds. On PR4 data, the TQU y-map shows ~40% lower cross-correlation with the IRAS 100 micron dust tracer than the standard T-only y-map (Table 3, Fig. 8), which the paper interprets as reduced Galactic contamination. Second, the paper explores selective CIB moment deprojection with constrained ILC (CILC), proposing scale-dependent configurations (e.g., CILC[0,dT] (j>=6)) that improve the bias-variance trade-off compared to blind moment deprojection. The maps are to be made public.

Significance. The central idea is novel and cleanly derived: using polarization channels as pure auxiliary foreground templates in an ILC is a generic and transferable strategy for unpolarized signal extraction. The analytic suppression factor is parameter-free given the data covariance, and the simulation null test is a strong falsifiable check. The public release of the maps is a useful community resource. If the y x IRAS metric is shown to be unbiased and its uncertainties are quantified, the claimed ~40% reduction on PR4 data and the forecast for future low-noise experiments would be significant for SZ cosmology and for component-separation methodology more broadly.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.2.2, Table 3] The headline 40-45% reduction in y x IRAS is reported without error bars. The cross-spectrum is noisy and can approach zero at high ell; Fig. 8 shows absolute values while Table 3 uses signed ratios. The average percentage over ell in [10,1500] is not a well-defined estimator unless the denominator is positive and the uncertainty is quantified. Provide jackknife or simulation-based errors and restrict the average to multipoles where the T-only cross-spectrum is significantly nonzero.
  2. [Sec. 4.2.1, Eq. (4.2); Sec. 4.2.2] The <1% signal-loss test bounds loss of tSZ power, not bias in the y x IRAS cross-spectrum. The TQU weights (23 channels) are estimated from the same data used in the cross-correlation; variance minimization can preferentially suppress the high-variance dust modes that correlate with IRAS, biasing the cross-spectrum low. Add a simulation validation: compute y x IRAS for the T and TQU pipelines on Planck-like simulations and compare the ratio with the true projected Galactic residual ratio R_Gal (Eq. 4.2). Also test weights estimated on an independent data split or needlet scale to assess overfitting.
  3. [Sec. 4.2.2, Fig. 8] IRAS 100 micron emission is not a clean tracer of Galactic dust: it contains CIB, which is correlated with tSZ and is unpolarized (unlike the Galactic components). The TQU weights could reduce the CIB-correlated part of y x IRAS rather than the Galactic part, making the 40% figure a poor measure of Galactic mitigation. Test the interpretation by cross-correlating the TQU map with the GNILC CIB map (as in Sec. 4.3) and with a CIB-subtracted IRAS template, or by showing the reduction persists in the regime where CIB is subdominant.
  4. [Sec. 4.3, Fig. 10, Table 1] The 'optimal' CIB deprojection configurations (e.g., CILC[0,dT] (j>=6) and CILC[0,dbeta(j<6),dT(j>=6)]) are selected by empirical exploration on the same PR4 data used to report performance. The needlet band threshold j>=6 and the choice of moments are free parameters tuned to minimize y x CIB on that same data, with no cross-validation or simulation-based selection. Validate the chosen configuration on simulations with known CIB/tSZ inputs, or at minimum quantify the bias-variance trade-off under the selection procedure and the sensitivity to pivot parameters (T_bar, beta_bar, z_bar).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.1.2, Eq. (2.9)] The matrix P is not symmetric; the statement that its eigenvalues lie in [0,1] requires a short justification via similarity to the Hermitian matrix C_TT^{-1/2} C_TE C_EE^{-1} C_ET C_TT^{-1/2}. This would also make the inequality following Eq. (2.18) transparent.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. 2.1] The abstract says the method leverages 'TE and TB correlations', but the implementation uses Stokes Q and U maps, with E/B only discussed in Appendix A. Rephrase to avoid implying E/B maps are used directly.
  3. [Sec. 4.2.1, Table 2 and Fig. 2] The simulation ratios are based on a single realization of the Planck-like and low-noise skies, without error bars. State the realization count and, if feasible, provide a small set of realizations or an analytic variance estimate to support the LiteBIRD forecast.
  4. [Sec. 4.2.2, Fig. 8 and Table 3] Clarify whether the ratio in the bottom panel of Fig. 8 and the y x IRAS row of Table 3 use signed or absolute-value cross-spectra. The text and the figure caption are currently ambiguous, and sign flips at high ell would render a naive percentage meaningless.
  5. [Throughout] Minor typos and formatting inconsistencies: 'Zeldovich' vs 'Zel'dovich', inconsistent use of 'f_sky', and some equation references in the text (e.g., Eq. 2.18 vs Eq. 2.25) could be checked. Also, the footnote about 'the maps with other CIB deprojection configurations can be provided upon request' should be moved to the data availability statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the Hybrid NILC derivation and the y×IRAS validation are self-contained and not equivalent to the method's inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation (Eqs. 2.8–2.18) is an algebraic consequence of the ILC constraint and the block structure of the covariance matrix; the variance-suppression factor is a mathematical inequality, not a fitted result. The hybrid weights are computed from T, Q, U covariance data, and the headline 40% reduction is measured through cross-correlation with the IRAS 100 μm map, an external tracer not used in constructing the weights. This is an external validation, not a prediction that reduces to the fit. The simulation forecasts use known input foregrounds and include null tests where Galactic components are removed from polarization channels, demonstrating that the suppression mechanism is tied to physical T–E correlations rather than to the method's definition. The CIB moment-deprojection configurations are selected empirically by comparing y×CIB and auto-spectra; this is model selection on the reported metrics, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and the paper explicitly acknowledges the ambiguity in attributing the TQU y×CIB reduction to Galactic rather than CIB residuals. Self-citations [17], [38], and [47] provide methodological context and prior implementation details, but the equations and validation in this paper are re-derived and assessed independently, so no load-bearing circular reduction is present. The legitimate concerns about ILC overfitting bias and missing error bars on the percentage reductions are statistical robustness issues, not circularity by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rely on standard ILC linear algebra plus five domain assumptions: unpolarized tSZ, correlated Galactic TE/TB, first-order CIB moment model, IRAS as a clean dust tracer, and near-unbiased needlet covariance estimates. The hand-set inputs are the CIB pivot parameters (T=26.1 K, beta=1.75, z~0.2) and the needlet-band split (j>=6) chosen through empirical exploration; the latter is a selection on the same data used for validation. No new particles, fields, or entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • CIB pivot parameters (T_bar, beta_bar, z_bar) = 26.1 K, 1.75, ~0.2
    Chosen to define the moment expansion in Eq. 2.28; taken from Planck 2013 measurements and the mean redshift of Planck clusters, not fitted in this paper.
  • Deprojection band threshold (j>=6) = needlet bands 6-10
    The scale-dependent CIB configurations in Table 1 and Sec. 4.3 were selected by inspecting the same PR4 data used for evaluation; this is a post-hoc model selection.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The thermal SZ effect is unpolarized and follows the SED g_nu of Eq. 2.1, so its response vector across channels is (g, 0).
    Used to set the ILC constraint in Eq. 2.5; if cluster emission had a polarized component or relativistic corrections were significant, the constraint would not preserve the full tSZ signal.
  • domain assumption Galactic thermal dust and synchrotron emission have intrinsic TE/TB correlations in the sky that survive Planck noise and needlet localization.
    The variance suppression in Eqs. 2.18-2.25 relies on P_N (Eq. 2.21) being non-zero; Fig. 1 supports this for PR4 but the simulations underestimate it.
  • domain assumption CIB emission is adequately described by a first-order moment expansion around the pivot values T=26.1 K, beta=1.75 at z~0.2 (Eq. 2.28).
    The CILC constraints null only zeroth/first moments; if the pivot values or truncation are wrong, residual CIB bias remains in the deprojected maps.
  • domain assumption The IRAS 100 micron map mainly traces Galactic dust, with no large CIB or tSZ-correlated component in the cross-correlation used for validation.
    The headline 40% reduction is measured via y x IRAS in Sec. 4.2.2; if the tracer is contaminated by CIB or correlated with the tSZ signal, the reduction does not directly measure Galactic residual mitigation.
  • domain assumption The needlet covariance estimates (following [17]) give nearly unbiased ILC weights, and the extra ILC bias from adding 14 polarization channels is negligible.
    The paper bounds this only with simulations (<1% total power, Sec. 4.2.1); real-data ILC bias could partially mimic foreground suppression.
  • standard math The closed-form ILC solution w = C^{-1} a / (a^T C^{-1} a) and positive-definiteness of C with Schur complements are valid for the hybrid weights.
    Used in Eqs. 2.8-2.16; standard linear algebra result, not proved in the paper.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 26449 in / 16055 out tokens · 161973 ms · 2026-08-02T17:56:06.246990+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Residual foreground contamination in thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) Compton-$y$ parameter maps ($y$-maps) arises mainly from Galactic emissions -- thermal dust and synchrotron radiation -- on large angular scales, and from cosmic infrared background (CIB) anisotropies on small scales. Unlike the thermal SZ effect, Galactic foregrounds are strongly polarized. Exploiting this distinction, we introduce a hybrid Needlet Internal Linear Combination (Hybrid NILC) method that combines Planck total-intensity and polarization frequency maps in the component-separation pipeline, thereby improving the suppression of residual Galactic emission while preserving the unpolarized SZ signal by leveraging the intrinsic $TE$ and $TB$ correlations of thermal dust and synchrotron. Using Planck PR4 data, we find that the Hybrid NILC $y$-map exhibits about $40\,\%$ lower cross-correlation with the IRAS dust tracer than the standard temperature-only Planck $y$-map, indicating reduced residual Galactic contamination. Simulations further indicate that, for future high-sensitivity surveys such as LiteBIRD, the Hybrid NILC will become increasingly effective at suppressing Galactic residuals. We further address small-scale extragalactic contamination by selectively deprojecting specific moments of the CIB using a Constrained Hybrid NILC variant, achieving an improved balance between CIB suppression and noise penalty compared to previous implementations in the literature. These novel approaches -- particularly the joint use of temperature and polarization in component separation -- offer a powerful framework for disentangling polarized and unpolarized signals.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich cross-correlations with unWISE galaxies: disentangling radio contamination, dust properties, and electron pressure

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    Adding a fitted radio-emission component to tSZ×galaxy cross-spectra removes an apparent negative small-scale signal and yields spectra consistent with a standard halo model (9.5–11σ BIC preference for the radio term).

  2. Thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich cross-correlations with unWISE galaxies: disentangling radio contamination, dust properties, and electron pressure

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Radio contamination must be jointly fit with tSZ and CIB in unWISE-Planck/ACT cross-spectra; its inclusion yields positive signals to ℓ ≃ 6000 that match a two-parameter generalized NFW pressure profile.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 72 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Zeldovich and R.A

    Y.B. Zeldovich and R.A. Sunyaev,The Interaction of Matter and Radiation in a Hot-Model Universe, Ap&SS4(1969) 301

    1969

  2. [2]

    Sunyaev and Y.B

    R.A. Sunyaev and Y.B. Zeldovich,The Observations of Relic Radiation as a Test of the Nature of X-Ray Radiation from the Clusters of Galaxies,Comments on Astrophysics and Space Physics 4(1972) 173. 6They-maps with other CIB deprojection configurations can be provided upon request. 7http://www.esa.int/Planck – 27 –

    1972

  3. [3]

    Herranz, J.L

    D. Herranz, J.L. Sanz, M.P. Hobson, R.B. Barreiro, J.M. Diego, E. Mart ´ ınez-Gonz´ alez et al., Filtering techniques for the detection of Sunyaev-Zel’dovich clusters in multifrequency maps, MNRAS336(2002) 1057 [astro-ph/0203486]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    Diego, P

    J.M. Diego, P. Vielva, E. Mart ´ ınez-Gonz´ alez, J. Silk and J.L. Sanz,A Bayesian non-parametric method to detect clusters in Planck data, MNRAS336(2002) 1351 [astro-ph/0110587]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  5. [5]

    Leach, J.F

    S.M. Leach, J.F. Cardoso, C. Baccigalupi, R.B. Barreiro, M. Betoule, J. Bobin et al.,Component separation methods for the PLANCK mission, A&A491(2008) 597 [0805.0269]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    Remazeilles, J

    M. Remazeilles, J. Delabrouille and J.-F. Cardoso,CMB and SZ effect separation with constrained Internal Linear Combinations, MNRAS410(2011) 2481 [1006.5599]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  7. [7]

    Remazeilles, N

    M. Remazeilles, N. Aghanim and M. Douspis,Reconstruction of high-resolution Sunyaev-Zeldovich maps from heterogeneous data sets using needlets, MNRAS430(2013) 370 [1207.4683]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Hurier, J.F

    G. Hurier, J.F. Mac ´ ıas-P´ erez and S. Hildebrandt,MILCA, a modified internal linear combination algorithm to extract astrophysical emissions from multifrequency sky maps, A&A558(2013) A118 [1007.1149]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  9. [9]

    Planck Collaboration XXVII,Planck 2015 results. XXVII. The Second Planck Catalogue of Sunyaev-Zeldovich Sources, A&A594(2016) A27 [1502.01598]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    Bleem, B

    L.E. Bleem, B. Stalder, T. de Haan, K.A. Aird, S.W. Allen, D.E. Applegate et al.,Galaxy Clusters Discovered via the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect in the 2500-Square-Degree SPT-SZ Survey, ApJS216(2015) 27 [1409.0850]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Hilton, C

    M. Hilton, C. Sif´ on, S. Naess, M. Madhavacheril, M. Oguri, E. Rozo et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Catalog of ¿4000 Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Galaxy Clusters, ApJS253(2021) 3 [2009.11043]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Melin, J.G

    J.B. Melin, J.G. Bartlett, P. Tarr ´ ıo and G.W. Pratt,PSZSPT: A joint Planck and SPT-SZ cluster catalog, A&A647(2021) A106 [2009.08822]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Planck Collaboration XXII,Planck 2015 results. XXII. A map of the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, A&A594(2016) A22 [1502.01596]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Madhavacheril, J.C

    M.S. Madhavacheril, J.C. Hill, S. Næss, G.E. Addison, S. Aiola, T. Baildon et al.,Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Component-separated maps of CMB temperature and the thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect, Phys.Rev.D102(2020) 023534 [1911.05717]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Bleem, T.M

    L.E. Bleem, T.M. Crawford, B. Ansarinejad, B.A. Benson, S. Bocquet, J.E. Carlstrom et al., CMB/kSZ and Compton-y Maps from 2500 deg 2 of SPT-SZ and Planck Survey Data, ApJS258 (2022) 36 [2102.05033]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Tanimura, M

    H. Tanimura, M. Douspis, N. Aghanim and L. Salvati,Constraining cosmology with a new all-sky Compton parameter map from the Planck PR4 data, MNRAS509(2022) 300 [2110.08880]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Chandran, M

    J. Chandran, M. Remazeilles and R.B. Barreiro,An improved Compton parameter map of thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect from Planck PR4 data, MNRAS526(2023) 5682 [ 2305.10193]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    McCarthy and J.C

    F. McCarthy and J.C. Hill,Component-separated, CIB-cleaned thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich maps from Planck PR4 data with a flexible public needlet ILC pipeline, Phys.Rev.D109(2024) 023528 [2307.01043]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Coulton, M.S

    W. Coulton, M.S. Madhavacheril, A.J. Duivenvoorden, J.C. Hill, I. Abril-Cabezas, P.A.R. Ade et al.,Atacama cosmology telescope: High-resolution component-separated maps across one third of the sky,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 063530

    2024

  20. [20]

    Maniyar, F

    A.S. Maniyar, F. Bianchini, W.L.K. Wu, S. Raghunathan, A.J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad et al., SPT-3G D1: Compton-ymaps using data from the SPT-3G and Planck surveys,arXiv e-prints (2026) arXiv:2602.11279 [2602.11279]. – 28 –

    arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Planck Collaboration XX,Planck 2013 results. XX. Cosmology from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts, A&A571(2014) A20 [1303.5080]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    Planck Collaboration XXI,Planck 2013 results. XXI. Power spectrum and high-order statistics of the Planck all-sky Compton parameter map, A&A571(2014) A21 [1303.5081]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    Planck Collaboration XXIV,Planck 2015 results. XXIV. Cosmology from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts, A&A594(2016) A24 [1502.01597]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  24. [24]

    de Haan, B.A

    T. de Haan, B.A. Benson, L.E. Bleem, S.W. Allen, D.E. Applegate, M.L.N. Ashby et al., Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clusters in the 2500 Square-degree SPT-SZ Survey, ApJ 832(2016) 95 [1603.06522]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Bolliet, B

    B. Bolliet, B. Comis, E. Komatsu and J.F. Mac ´ ıas-P´ erez,Dark Energy from the Thermal Sunyaev Zeldovich Power Spectrum, MNRAS477(2018) 4957 [1712.00788]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Bocquet, J.P

    S. Bocquet, J.P. Dietrich, T. Schrabback, L.E. Bleem, M. Klein, S.W. Allen et al.,Cluster Cosmology Constraints from the 2500 deg 2 SPT-SZ Survey: Inclusion of Weak Gravitational Lensing Data from Magellan and the Hubble Space Telescope, ApJ878(2019) 55 [1812.01679]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Birkinshaw,The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect, Phys.Rep.310(1999) 97 [astro-ph/9808050]

    M. Birkinshaw,The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect, Phys.Rep.310(1999) 97 [astro-ph/9808050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  28. [28]

    Komatsu and T

    E. Komatsu and T. Kitayama,Sunyaev-Zeldovich Fluctuations from Spatial Correlations between Clusters of Galaxies, ApJ526(1999) L1 [astro-ph/9908087]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  29. [29]

    Carlstrom, G.P

    J.E. Carlstrom, G.P. Holder and E.D. Reese,Cosmology with the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect, ARA&A40(2002) 643 [astro-ph/0208192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  30. [30]

    Komatsu and U

    E. Komatsu and U. Seljak,The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich angular power spectrum as a probe of cosmological parameters, MNRAS336(2002) 1256 [astro-ph/0205468]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  31. [31]

    Rubi˜ no-Mart ´ ın and R.A

    J.A. Rubi˜ no-Mart ´ ın and R.A. Sunyaev,Discriminating between unresolved point sources and ‘negative’ Sunyaev-Zel’dovich clusters in cosmic microwave background maps, MNRAS344 (2003) 1155 [astro-ph/0211430]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  32. [32]

    Mroczkowski, D

    T. Mroczkowski, D. Nagai, K. Basu, J. Chluba, J. Sayers, R. Adam et al.,Astrophysics with the Spatially and Spectrally Resolved Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effects. A Millimetre/Submillimetre Probe of the Warm and Hot Universe, Space Sci.Rev.215(2019) 17 [1811.02310]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Allys, K

    LiteBIRD Collaboration, E. Allys, K. Arnold, J. Aumont, R. Aurlien, S. Azzoni et al.,Probing Cosmic Inflation with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey,arXiv e-prints(2022) arXiv:2202.02773 [2202.02773]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Abitbol, I

    M. Abitbol, I. Abril-Cabezas, S. Adachi, P. Ade, A.E. Adler, P. Agrawal et al.,The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts for the enhanced Large Aperture Telescope, JCAP2025 (2025) 034 [2503.00636]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Remazeilles, M

    M. Remazeilles, M. Douspis, J.A. Rubi˜ no-Mart ´ ın, A.J. Banday, J. Chluba, P. de Bernardis et al., LiteBIRD science goals and forecasts. Mapping the hot gas in the Universe, JCAP2024(2024) 026 [2407.17555]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Delabrouille, J.F

    J. Delabrouille, J.F. Cardoso, M. Le Jeune, M. Betoule, G. Fay and F. Guilloux,A full sky, low foreground, high resolution CMB map from WMAP, A&A493(2009) 835 [0807.0773]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  37. [37]

    L VII,Planck intermediate results

    Planck Collaboration Int. L VII,Planck intermediate results. L VII. NPIPE: Joint Planck LFI and HFI data processing, A&A643(2020) 42 [2007.04997]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Remazeilles,Field-level constraints on cosmic birefringence from hybrid ILC maps combining E- and B-mode channels, JCAP2025(2025) 013 [2507.22109]

    M. Remazeilles,Field-level constraints on cosmic birefringence from hybrid ILC maps combining E- and B-mode channels, JCAP2025(2025) 013 [2507.22109]

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Kusiak, K.M

    A. Kusiak, K.M. Surrao and J.C. Hill,Enhancing Measurements of the CMB Blackbody Temperature Power Spectrum by Removing CIB and Thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Contamination Using External Galaxy Catalogs,arXiv e-prints(2023) arXiv:2303.08121 [2303.08121]. – 29 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    L. Knox, A. Cooray, D. Eisenstein and Z. Haiman,Probing Early Structure Formation with Far-Infrared Background Correlations, ApJ550(2001) 7 [astro-ph/0009151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  41. [41]

    B´ ethermin, L

    M. B´ ethermin, L. Wang, O. Dor´ e, G. Lagache, M. Sargent, E. Daddi et al.,The redshift evolution of the distribution of star formation among dark matter halos as seen in the infrared, A&A557 (2013) A66 [1304.3936]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    B´ ethermin, E

    M. B´ ethermin, E. Daddi, G. Magdis, C. Lagos, M. Sargent, M. Albrecht et al.,Evolution of the dust emission of massive galaxies up to z = 4 and constraints on their dominant mode of star formation, A&A573(2015) A113 [1409.5796]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    Addison, J

    G.E. Addison, J. Dunkley and D.N. Spergel,Modelling the correlation between the thermal Sunyaev Zel’dovich effect and the cosmic infrared background, MNRAS427(2012) 1741 [1204.5927]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  44. [44]

    George, C.L

    E.M. George, C.L. Reichardt, K.A. Aird, B.A. Benson, L.E. Bleem, J.E. Carlstrom et al.,A Measurement of Secondary Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies from the 2500 Square-degree SPT-SZ Survey, ApJ799(2015) 177 [1408.3161]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  45. [45]

    Planck Collaboration XXIII,Planck 2015 results. XXIII. The thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect–cosmic infrared background correlation, A&A594(2016) A23 [1509.06555]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Maniyar, M

    A. Maniyar, M. B´ ethermin and G. Lagache,Simple halo model formalism for the cosmic infrared background and its correlation with the thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect, A&A645(2021) A40 [2006.16329]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Remazeilles, A

    M. Remazeilles, A. Rotti and J. Chluba,Peeling off foregrounds with the constrained moment ILC method to unveil primordial CMB B modes, MNRAS503(2021) 2478 [2006.08628]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Hill and D.N

    J.C. Hill and D.N. Spergel,Detection of thermal SZ-CMB lensing cross-correlation in Planck nominal mission data, JCAP2014(2014) 030 [1312.4525]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [49]

    Hurier,Predicting the CIB-φcontamination in the cross-correlation of the tSZ effect andφ, A&A575(2015) L11 [1701.09047]

    G. Hurier,Predicting the CIB-φcontamination in the cross-correlation of the tSZ effect andφ, A&A575(2015) L11 [1701.09047]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  50. [50]

    McCarthy and J.C

    F. McCarthy and J.C. Hill,Cross-correlation of the thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich and CMB lensing signals in Planck PR4 data with robust CIB decontamination, Phys.Rev.D109(2024) 023529 [2308.16260]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Vikram, A

    V. Vikram, A. Lidz and B. Jain,A Measurement of the Galaxy Group-Thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect Cross-Correlation Function, MNRAS467(2017) 2315 [1608.04160]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Makiya, S

    R. Makiya, S. Ando and E. Komatsu,Joint analysis of the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect and 2MASS galaxies: probing gas physics in the local Universe and beyond, MNRAS480(2018) 3928 [1804.05008]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    Pandey, E.J

    S. Pandey, E.J. Baxter, Z. Xu, J. Orlowski-Scherer, N. Zhu, A. Lidz et al.,Constraints on the redshift evolution of astrophysical feedback with Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect cross-correlations, Phys.Rev.D100(2019) 063519 [1904.13347]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Koukoufilippas, D

    N. Koukoufilippas, D. Alonso, M. Bilicki and J.A. Peacock,Tomographic measurement of the intergalactic gas pressure through galaxy-tSZ cross-correlations, MNRAS491(2020) 5464 [1909.09102]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Z. Yan, L. van Waerbeke, T. Tr¨ oster, A.H. Wright, D. Alonso, M. Asgari et al.,Probing galaxy bias and intergalactic gas pressure with KiDS Galaxies-tSZ-CMB lensing cross-correlations, A&A 651(2021) A76 [2102.07701]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Chluba, J.C

    J. Chluba, J.C. Hill and M.H. Abitbol,Rethinking CMB foregrounds: systematic extension of foreground parametrizations, MNRAS472(2017) 1195 [1701.00274]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Zubeldia, J

    ´I. Zubeldia, J. Chluba and R. Battye,Mitigating the impact of the CIB on galaxy cluster SZ detection with spectrally constrained matched filters, MNRAS522(2023) 5123 [2212.07410]. – 30 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Planck Collaboration XXX,Planck 2013 results. XXX. Cosmic infrared background measurements and implications for star formation, A&A571(2014) A30 [1309.0382]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    Carones and M

    A. Carones and M. Remazeilles,Optimization of foreground moment deprojection for semi-blind CMB polarization reconstruction, JCAP2024(2024) 018 [2402.17579]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    XL VIII,Planck intermediate results

    Planck Collaboration Int. XL VIII,Planck intermediate results. XL VIII. Disentangling Galactic dust emission and cosmic infrared background anisotropies, A&A596(2016) A109 [ 1605.09387]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  61. [61]

    Delabrouille, M

    J. Delabrouille, M. Betoule, J.-B. Melin, M.-A. Miville-Deschˆ enes, J. Gonzalez-Nuevo, M. Le Jeune et al.,The pre-launch Planck Sky Model: a model of sky emission at submillimetre to centimetre wavelengths, A&A553(2013) A96 [1207.3675]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  62. [62]

    Remazeilles, A

    M. Remazeilles, A. Ravenni and J. Chluba,Leverage on small-scale primordial non-Gaussianity through cross-correlations between CMB E-mode andµ-distortion anisotropies, MNRAS512 (2022) 455 [2110.14664]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Tinker, A.V

    J. Tinker, A.V. Kravtsov, A. Klypin, K. Abazajian, M. Warren, G. Yepes et al.,Toward a Halo Mass Function for Precision Cosmology: The Limits of Universality, ApJ688(2008) 709 [0803.2706]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  64. [64]

    Planck Collaboration VI,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, A&A641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    Arnaud, G.W

    M. Arnaud, G.W. Pratt, R. Piffaretti, H. B¨ ohringer, J.H. Croston and E. Pointecouteau,The universal galaxy cluster pressure profile from a representative sample of nearby systems (REXCESS) and the Y SZ - M 500 relation, A&A517(2010) A92 [0910.1234]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  66. [66]

    Planck Collaboration IV,Planck 2018 results. IV. Diffuse component separation, A&A641 (2020) A4 [1807.06208]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    Remazeilles, C

    M. Remazeilles, C. Dickinson, A.J. Banday, M.-A. Bigot-Sazy and T. Ghosh,An improved source-subtracted and destriped 408-MHz all-sky map, MNRAS451(2015) 4311 [1411.3628]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Miville-Deschˆ enes, N

    M.-A. Miville-Deschˆ enes, N. Ysard, A. Lavabre, N. Ponthieu, J.F. Mac ´ ıas-P´ erez, J. Aumont et al.,Separation of anomalous and synchrotron emissions using WMAP polarization data, A&A 490(2008) 1093 [0802.3345]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  69. [69]

    G´ orski, E

    K.M. G´ orski, E. Hivon, A.J. Banday, B.D. Wandelt, F.K. Hansen, M. Reinecke et al.,HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere, ApJ622(2005) 759 [astro-ph/0409513]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  70. [70]

    Planck Collaboration I,Planck 2018 results. I. Overview, and the cosmological legacy of Planck, A&A641(2020) A1 [1807.06205]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    Narcowich, P

    F.J. Narcowich, P. Petrushev and J.D. Ward,Localized tight frames on spheres,SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis38(2006) 574 [https://doi.org/10.1137/040614359]

    doi:10.1137/040614359 2006

  72. [72]

    Marinucci, D

    D. Marinucci, D. Pietrobon, A. Balbi, P. Baldi, P. Cabella, G. Kerkyacharian et al.,Spherical needlets for cosmic microwave background data analysis, MNRAS383(2008) 539 [0707.0844]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  73. [73]

    Alonso, J

    D. Alonso, J. Sanchez, A. Slosar and LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration,A unified pseudo-Cℓ framework, MNRAS484(2019) 4127 [1809.09603]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    L´ opez-Caniego, D

    M. L´ opez-Caniego, D. Herranz, J. Gonz´ alez-Nuevo, J.L. Sanz, R.B. Barreiro, P. Vielva et al., Comparison of filters for the detection of point sources in Planck simulations, MNRAS370 (2006) 2047 [astro-ph/0606199]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  75. [75]

    Planck Collaboration XXVI,Planck 2015 results. XXVI. The Second Planck Catalogue of Compact Sources, A&A594(2016) A26 [1507.02058]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  76. [76]

    Ebeling, C.R

    H. Ebeling, C.R. Mullis and R.B. Tully,A Systematic X-Ray Search for Clusters of Galaxies behind the Milky Way, ApJ580(2002) 774. – 31 –

    2002

  77. [77]

    Kocevski, H

    D.D. Kocevski, H. Ebeling, C.R. Mullis and R.B. Tully,A Systematic X-Ray Search for Clusters of Galaxies behind the Milky Way. II. The Second CIZA Subsample, ApJ662(2007) 224 [astro-ph/0512321]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  78. [78]

    Miville-Deschˆ enes and G

    M.-A. Miville-Deschˆ enes and G. Lagache,IRIS: A New Generation of IRAS Maps, ApJS157 (2005) 302 [astro-ph/0412216]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  79. [79]

    Price-Whelan, P.L

    Astropy Collaboration, A.M. Price-Whelan, P.L. Lim, N. Earl, N. Starkman, L. Bradley et al., The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package, ApJ935(2022) 167 [2206.14220]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T.E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau et al.,SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python,Nature Methods17(2020) 261

    2020

Showing first 80 references.