pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.19033 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-19 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Unfolded hypermultiplet in harmonic superspace

Nikita Misuna
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 08:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords unfolded dynamicsharmonic superspacehypermultipletsupersymmetryR-symmetryvielbeinizationbackground universalityon-shell formulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

An unfolded system for the on-shell massless hypermultiplet yields the standard harmonic superspace formulation through vielbeinization of R-symmetry 1-forms and generates equivalent descriptions in other superspaces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs an unfolded system of differential equations that captures the dynamics of the on-shell free massless hypermultiplet. It shows that the familiar harmonic superspace formulation emerges directly when the unfolded 1-forms tied to R-symmetry are converted into vielbeins. The same starting system then produces the corresponding descriptions in N=2 superspace, N=1 superspace, and the component formulation in Minkowski space. A reader would care because this establishes a single dynamical origin from which multiple standard formulations of the same physical model can be recovered systematically.

Core claim

We construct an unfolded system that describes an on-shell free massless hypermultiplet and show that the standard harmonic superspace formulation of this model naturally arises from the vielbeinization of unfolded 1-forms associated to R-symmetry. Moreover, using this system as an example, we demonstrate the phenomenon of background universality of the unfolded dynamics approach: we systematically deduce formulations in harmonic, N=2, and N=1 superspaces, as well as the component formulation in Minkowski space, directly from this unfolded system. We also comment on a putative off-shell extension of the on-shell system we constructed, and show how the harmonic contribution is reflected in a

What carries the argument

The unfolded system of first-order differential constraints on hypermultiplet fields, where the carrying mechanism is the vielbeinization of R-symmetry 1-forms that reproduces the harmonic superspace constraints.

If this is right

  • The standard harmonic superspace formulation arises naturally from the unfolded system.
  • Formulations in N=2 superspace, N=1 superspace, and the component Minkowski space formulation can be deduced directly from the same unfolded system.
  • The harmonic contribution appears in the universal unfolded fiber.
  • A putative off-shell extension of the on-shell unfolded system is consistent with the same construction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The background universality may allow the same unfolded starting point to generate descriptions of the hypermultiplet in curved superspace backgrounds without separate constructions.
  • The approach could extend to other supermultiplets by identifying analogous R-symmetry 1-forms and performing the same vielbeinization step.
  • The universal fiber structure suggests that differences between superspace formulations are encoded in auxiliary choices rather than in the core dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The unfolded 1-forms associated to R-symmetry can be consistently vielbeinized to recover the harmonic superspace formulation without introducing extra constraints or losing on-shell equivalence.

What would settle it

A direct calculation showing that the vielbeinized R-symmetry 1-forms produce constraints that fail to match the known harmonic superspace equations for the hypermultiplet, or that the N=1 formulation derived from the unfolded system differs from the standard N=1 hypermultiplet constraints.

read the original abstract

We construct an unfolded system that describes an on-shell free massless hypermultiplet and show that the standard harmonic superspace formulation of this model naturally arises from the "vielbeinization" of unfolded 1-forms associated to R-symmetry. Moreover, using this system as an example, we demonstrate the phenomenon of background universality of the unfolded dynamics approach: we systematically deduce formulations in harmonic, N=2, and N=1 superspaces, as well as the component formulation in Minkowski space, directly from this unfolded system. We also comment on a putative off-shell extension of the on-shell system we constructed, and show how the harmonic contribution is reflected in the universal unfolded fiber.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs an unfolded system describing the on-shell free massless hypermultiplet. It claims that the standard harmonic superspace formulation naturally arises via 'vielbeinization' of unfolded 1-forms associated to R-symmetry. Using this system, the paper demonstrates background universality by deriving equivalent formulations in harmonic superspace, N=2 superspace, N=1 superspace, and the component formulation in Minkowski space directly from the unfolded system. It also comments on a putative off-shell extension and the reflection of the harmonic contribution in the universal unfolded fiber.

Significance. If the central construction holds, the work provides a concrete example of background universality in the unfolded dynamics approach for N=2 supersymmetric models. This could be significant for unifying different superspace and component formulations under a single unfolded system, potentially aiding systematic derivations and off-shell extensions in extended supersymmetry.

major comments (2)
  1. [main construction section] The vielbeinization step of the unfolded 1-forms associated to R-symmetry (main construction section following the abstract claim) requires explicit equations identifying the 1-forms, the precise vielbeinization map, and verification that the resulting constraints exactly recover the standard harmonic superspace formulation without introducing extra conditions or altering on-shell degrees of freedom.
  2. [universality derivation section] In the background universality demonstration (section deriving N=2, N=1, and component formulations), the reduction steps from the unfolded system must be shown explicitly to confirm preservation of on-shell equivalence and absence of spurious relations across all derived formulations.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify notation for unfolded fields, R-symmetry indices, and harmonic variables with a summary table or explicit definitions early in the text.
  2. Expand references to prior unfolded dynamics literature and harmonic superspace formulations to better contextualize the novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have prepared revisions to incorporate the requested clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [main construction section] The vielbeinization step of the unfolded 1-forms associated to R-symmetry (main construction section following the abstract claim) requires explicit equations identifying the 1-forms, the precise vielbeinization map, and verification that the resulting constraints exactly recover the standard harmonic superspace formulation without introducing extra conditions or altering on-shell degrees of freedom.

    Authors: We agree that providing more explicit details on the vielbeinization procedure will improve the clarity of the presentation. In the revised manuscript, we will add the explicit equations that identify the unfolded 1-forms associated to the R-symmetry, specify the precise vielbeinization map, and include a verification showing that the resulting constraints recover the standard harmonic superspace formulation exactly, without introducing extra conditions or altering the on-shell degrees of freedom. These additions will be placed in the main construction section following the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [universality derivation section] In the background universality demonstration (section deriving N=2, N=1, and component formulations), the reduction steps from the unfolded system must be shown explicitly to confirm preservation of on-shell equivalence and absence of spurious relations across all derived formulations.

    Authors: We concur that explicit demonstration of the reduction steps is necessary to fully substantiate the background universality. Accordingly, the revised manuscript will include detailed step-by-step reductions from the unfolded system to the N=2 superspace, N=1 superspace, and component formulations in Minkowski space. These will explicitly confirm the preservation of on-shell equivalence and the absence of spurious relations in each derived formulation. The expansions will be provided in the universality derivation section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: unfolded system derives standard formulations

full rationale

The paper starts from a constructed unfolded system for the on-shell free massless hypermultiplet and derives the harmonic superspace formulation (plus N=2, N=1, and component versions) via vielbeinization of R-symmetry 1-forms. This direction—from new unfolded equations to recovery of known formulations—contains no self-definitional loops, no fitted inputs renamed as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to prior unverified inputs. The background-universality demonstration follows directly from the same system without requiring external normalization or ansatz smuggling. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the paper's own equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The central construction rests on the domain assumption that unfolded dynamics can encode the on-shell hypermultiplet.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Unfolded dynamics can describe an on-shell free massless hypermultiplet
    Stated as the starting point of the construction in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5397 in / 1290 out tokens · 42023 ms · 2026-05-15T08:31:44.382642+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We construct an unfolded system that describes an on-shell free massless hypermultiplet and show that the standard harmonic superspace formulation of this model naturally arises from the 'vielbeinization' of unfolded 1-forms associated to R-symmetry. Moreover, using this system as an example, we demonstrate the phenomenon of background universality of the unfolded dynamics approach.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Classifying double copies and multicopies in AdS

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Double copies in 4D AdS gravity are classified one-to-one with orbits of so(2,3) isometry elements via a Penrose-type transform, yielding black holes, branes and other solutions, with extension to multicopies for high...

  2. Self-dual gravity from higher-spin theory

    hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Self-dual gravity with cosmological constant emerges uniquely as the rigid lower-spin sector of four-dimensional higher-spin interactions when only self-dual vertices are kept.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Actions, Charges and Off-Shell Fields in the Unfolded Dynamics Approach

    M. A. Vasiliev. “Actions, charges and off-shell fields in the unfolded dynamics ap- proach”. In:Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.3 (2006), pp. 37–80.doi:10 . 1142 / S0219887806001016. arXiv:hep-th/0504090

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  2. [2]

    Consistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in (3+1)- dimensions

    M. A. Vasiliev. “Consistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in (3+1)- dimensions”. In:Phys. Lett. B243 (1990), pp. 378–382.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90) 91400-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90 1990

  3. [3]

    More on equations of motion for interacting massless fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions

    M. A. Vasiliev. “More on equations of motion for interacting massless fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions”. In:Phys. Lett. B285 (1992), pp. 225–234.doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(92)91457-K

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1992

  4. [4]

    Chiral higher spin gravity in (A)dS4 and secrets of Chern–Simons matter theories

    A. Sharapov and E. Skvortsov. “Chiral higher spin gravity in (A)dS4 and secrets of Chern–Simons matter theories”. In:Nucl. Phys. B985 (2022), p. 115982.doi:10.1016/ j.nuclphysb.2022.115982. arXiv:2205.15293 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    More on Chiral Higher Spin Gravity and convex geometry

    A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, A. Sukhanov, and R. Van Dongen. “More on Chiral Higher Spin Gravity and convex geometry”. In:Nucl. Phys. B990 (2023), p. 116152.doi:10. 1016/j.nuclphysb.2023.116152. arXiv:2209.15441 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Toward higher-spin symmetry breaking in the bulk

    V. E. Didenko and A. V. Korybut. “Toward higher-spin symmetry breaking in the bulk”. In:Phys. Rev. D110.2 (2024), p. 026007.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.026007. arXiv: 2312.11096 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.026007 2024

  7. [7]

    Fractional spins, unfolding, and holography. Part II. 4D higher spin gravity and 3D conformal dual

    F. Diaz, C. Iazeolla, and P. Sundell. “Fractional spins, unfolding, and holography. Part II. 4D higher spin gravity and 3D conformal dual”. In:JHEP10 (2024), p. 066.doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2024)066. arXiv:2403.02301 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2024)066 2024

  8. [8]

    Fractional spins, unfolding, and holography. Part I. Parent field equations for dual higher-spin gravity reductions

    F. Diaz, C. Iazeolla, and P. Sundell. “Fractional spins, unfolding, and holography. Part I. Parent field equations for dual higher-spin gravity reductions”. In:JHEP09 (2024), p. 109.doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)109. arXiv:2403.02283 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2024)109 2024

  9. [9]

    All vertices for unconstrained symmetric gauge fields

    V. E. Didenko and M. A. Povarnin. “All vertices for unconstrained symmetric gauge fields”. In:Phys. Rev. D110.12 (2024). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 111, 109901 (2025)], p. 126012.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.126012. arXiv:2409.00808 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.126012 2024

  10. [10]

    Lorentz covariance of the 4d nonlinear higher-spin equations via BRST

    O. A. Gelfond and M. A. Vasiliev. “Lorentz covariance of the 4d nonlinear higher-spin equations via BRST”. In:Phys. Lett. B871 (2025), p. 139969.doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2025.139969. arXiv:2509.22852 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb 2025

  11. [11]

    Quadratic corrections to the higher-spin equations by the differential homotopy approach

    P. T. Kirakosiants, D. A. Valerev, and M. A. Vasiliev. “Quadratic corrections to the higher-spin equations by the differential homotopy approach”. In:Nucl. Phys. B1023 (2026), p. 117290.doi:10 . 1016 / j . nuclphysb . 2025 . 117290. arXiv:2506 . 16634 [hep-th]. 17

    work page 2026

  12. [12]

    Higher Spins, Holography and Exotic Matter

    C. Iazeolla and P. Sundell. “Higher Spins, Holography and Exotic Matter”. In: Nov. 2025. arXiv:2511.07408 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Linearized Coxeter higher-spin the- ories

    A. A. Tarusov, K. A. Ushakov, and M. A. Vasiliev. “Linearized Coxeter higher-spin the- ories”. In:JHEP08 (2025), p. 052.doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2025)052. arXiv:2503.05948 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2025)052 2025

  14. [14]

    On consistency of the interacting (anti)holomorphic higher-spin sector

    A. V. Korybut. “On consistency of the interacting (anti)holomorphic higher-spin sector”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C85.8 (2025), p. 885.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 025- 14617- 9. arXiv:2505.13125 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2025

  15. [15]

    Unfolded dynamics approach and quantum field theory

    N. Misuna. “Unfolded dynamics approach and quantum field theory”. In:JHEP12 (2023), p. 119.doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2023)119. arXiv:2208.04306 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2023)119 2023

  16. [16]

    A. S. Galperin, E. A. Ivanov, V. I. Ogievetsky, and E. S. Sokatchev.Harmonic superspace. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2007. isbn: 978-0-511-53510-9, 978-0-521-02042-8, 978-0-521-80164-5, 978-0-511-03236-3.doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511535109

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511535109 2007

  17. [17]

    Unconstrained N=2 Matter, Yang-Mills and Supergravity Theories in Harmonic Superspace

    A. Galperin, E. Ivanov, S. Kalitzin, V. Ogievetsky, and E. Sokatchev. “Unconstrained N=2 Matter, Yang-Mills and Supergravity Theories in Harmonic Superspace”. In:Class. Quant. Grav.1 (1984). [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 2, 127 (1985)], pp. 469–498.doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/1/5/004

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/1/5/004 1984

  18. [18]

    Unfolded Scalar Supermultiplet

    D. S. Ponomarev and M. A. Vasiliev. “Unfolded Scalar Supermultiplet”. In:JHEP01 (2012), p. 152.doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2012)152. arXiv:1012.2903 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2012)152 2012

  19. [19]

    Off-Shell Scalar Supermultiplet in the Unfolded Dynamics Approach

    N. G. Misuna and M. A. Vasiliev. “Off-Shell Scalar Supermultiplet in the Unfolded Dy- namics Approach”. In:JHEP05 (2014), p. 140.doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2014)140. arXiv: 1301.2230 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2014)140 2014

  20. [20]

    Unfolded equations for massive higher spin supermultiplets in AdS_3

    I. L. Buchbinder, T. V. Snegirev, and Y. M. Zinoviev. “Unfolded equations for mas- sive higher spin supermultiplets in AdS 3”. In:JHEP08 (2016), p. 075.doi:10.1007/ JHEP08(2016)075. arXiv:1606.02475 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Massive higher spin supermultiplets unfolded

    M. V. Khabarov and Y. M. Zinoviev. “Massive higher spin supermultiplets unfolded”. In: Nucl. Phys. B953 (2020), p. 114959.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.114959. arXiv: 2001.07903 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.114959 2020

  22. [22]

    On unfolded approach to off-shell supersymmetric models

    N. G. Misuna. “On unfolded approach to off-shell supersymmetric models”. In:Phys. Lett. B840 (2023), p. 137845.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137845. arXiv:2201.01674 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137845 2023

  23. [23]

    Unfolding the six-dimensional tensor multiplet

    C. Iazeolla, P. Sundell, and B. C. Vallilo. “Unfolding the six-dimensional tensor multiplet”. In:J. Phys. A58.36 (2025), p. 365402.doi:10.1088/1751-8121/adfe46. arXiv:2503. 14673 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/adfe46 2025

  24. [24]

    Supersymmetric higher-spin gauge theories in any d and their cou- pling constants within BRST formalism

    M. A. Vasiliev. “Supersymmetric higher-spin gauge theories in any d and their cou- pling constants within BRST formalism”. In:JHEP07 (2025), p. 110.doi:10.1007/ JHEP07(2025)110. arXiv:2503.10967 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Presymplectic BV-AKSZ forN= 1,D= 4 Supergrav- ity

    M. Grigoriev and A. Mamekin. “Presymplectic BV-AKSZ forN= 1,D= 4 Supergrav- ity”. In: (Mar. 2025). arXiv:2503.04559 [hep-th]. 18

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Unconstrained off-shell superfield formulation of 4D,N= 2 supersymmetric higher spins

    I. Buchbinder, E. Ivanov, and N. Zaigraev. “Unconstrained off-shell superfield formulation of 4D,N= 2 supersymmetric higher spins”. In:JHEP12 (2021), p. 016.doi:10.1007/ JHEP12(2021)016. arXiv:2109.07639 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Off-shell cubic hypermultiplet couplings to N= 2 higher spin gauge superfields

    I. Buchbinder, E. Ivanov, and N. Zaigraev. “Off-shell cubic hypermultiplet couplings to N= 2 higher spin gauge superfields”. In:JHEP05 (2022), p. 104.doi:10 . 1007 / JHEP05(2022)104. arXiv:2202.08196 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    UnconstrainedN= 2 Higher-Spin Gauge Superfields and Their Hypermultiplet Couplings

    I. Buchbinder, E. Ivanov, and N. Zaigraev. “UnconstrainedN= 2 Higher-Spin Gauge Superfields and Their Hypermultiplet Couplings”. In:Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett.20.3 (2023), pp. 300–305.doi:10.1134/S1547477123030172. arXiv:2211.09501 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1134/s1547477123030172 2023

  29. [29]

    N= 2 higher spins: superfield equations of motion, the hypermultiplet supercurrents, and the component structure

    I. Buchbinder, E. Ivanov, and N. Zaigraev. “N= 2 higher spins: superfield equations of motion, the hypermultiplet supercurrents, and the component structure”. In:JHEP03 (2023), p. 036.doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2023)036. arXiv:2212.14114 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2023)036 2023

  30. [30]

    N= 2 superconformal higher-spin multi- plets and their hypermultiplet couplings

    I. Buchbinder, E. Ivanov, and N. Zaigraev. “N= 2 superconformal higher-spin multi- plets and their hypermultiplet couplings”. In:JHEP08 (2024), p. 120.doi:10.1007/ JHEP08(2024)120. arXiv:2404.19016 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    N= 2 higher spin theories and harmonic superspace

    I. Buchbinder, E. Ivanov, and N. Zaigraev. “N= 2 higher spin theories and harmonic superspace”. In:PoSICPPCRubakov2023 (2024), p. 048.doi:10.22323/1.455.0048. arXiv:2402.05704 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.22323/1.455.0048 2024

  32. [32]

    N=2 higher-spin supercurrents

    N. Zaigraev. “N=2 higher-spin supercurrents”. In:Phys. Lett. B858 (2024), p. 139056. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139056. arXiv:2408.00668 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139056 2024

  33. [33]

    Infinitesimal computations in topology

    D. Sullivan. “Infinitesimal computations in topology”. In:Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math.47.1 (1977), pp. 269–331.doi:10.1007/BF02684341

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02684341 1977

  34. [34]

    Invariant Functionals in Higher-Spin Theory

    M. A. Vasiliev. “Invariant Functionals in Higher-Spin Theory”. In:Nucl. Phys. B916 (2017), pp. 219–253.doi:10 . 1016 / j . nuclphysb . 2017 . 01 . 001. arXiv:1504 . 07289 [hep-th]

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Lorentz covariant form of extended higher-spin equations

    V. E. Didenko, N. G. Misuna, and M. A. Vasiliev. “Lorentz covariant form of extended higher-spin equations”. In:JHEP07 (2018), p. 133.doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)133. arXiv:1712.09272 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2018)133 2018

  36. [36]

    Holography, Unfolding and Higher-Spin Theory

    M. A. Vasiliev. “Holography, Unfolding and Higher-Spin Theory”. In:J. Phys. A46 (2013), p. 214013.doi:10 . 1088 / 1751 - 8113 / 46 / 21 / 214013. arXiv:1203 . 5554 [hep-th]

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Scalar electrodynamics and Higgs mechanism in the unfolded dynamics ap- proach

    N. Misuna. “Scalar electrodynamics and Higgs mechanism in the unfolded dynamics ap- proach”. In:JHEP12 (2024), p. 090.doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)090. arXiv:2402. 14164 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)090 2024

  38. [38]

    On unfolded off-shell formulation for higher-spin theory

    N. Misuna. “On unfolded off-shell formulation for higher-spin theory”. In:Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019), p. 134956.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134956. arXiv:1905.06925 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134956 2019

  39. [39]

    Off-shell higher-spin fields in AdS 4 and external currents

    N. G. Misuna. “Off-shell higher-spin fields in AdS 4 and external currents”. In:JHEP12 (2021), p. 172.doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2021)172. arXiv:2012.06570 [hep-th]. 19

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2021)172 2021