pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.22082 · v3 · submitted 2026-03-23 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Mini-review of charmonium weak decays at BESIII

Xuze Li , Kaixin Fan , Zhengyun You , Yu Zhang , Minggang Zhao
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords charmoniumweak decaysBESIIIJ/psipsi(2S)upper limitsFCNCsemi-leptonic decays
0
0 comments X

The pith

BESIII establishes the tightest upper limits to date on rare weak decays of J/ψ and ψ(2S) using its record datasets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This mini-review compiles searches for weak decays of charmonium states performed at the BESIII experiment. These decays are heavily suppressed in the standard model, so any signal would point to new physics while non-observation tightens constraints on beyond-standard-model contributions and on non-perturbative QCD. The experiment collected more than 10 billion J/ψ events and 2.7 billion ψ(2S) events, enabling searches in semi-leptonic, non-leptonic, and flavor-changing neutral current modes. A sympathetic reader cares because the resulting limits represent the current experimental frontier for these processes and directly inform theoretical models of flavor violation at low energies.

Core claim

The BESIII collaboration has used its large samples of J/ψ and ψ(2S) to perform dedicated searches for weak charmonium decays and has set the most stringent upper limits available on branching fractions for a range of semi-leptonic, non-leptonic, and FCNC channels.

What carries the argument

The large accumulated data samples of over 10^10 J/ψ events and 2.7×10^9 ψ(2S) events, together with the dedicated reconstruction and background-suppression analyses that convert non-observation into quantitative upper limits on branching fractions.

If this is right

  • The limits constrain possible new-physics contributions to flavor-changing neutral currents in the charm sector.
  • They provide quantitative benchmarks for non-perturbative QCD calculations of charmonium weak-decay rates.
  • Improved bounds on semi-leptonic modes help test lepton-flavor universality in the charm region.
  • The results serve as reference points for planning future searches at higher-luminosity tau-charm facilities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the current limits persist, they will narrow the parameter space for models that predict enhanced charm FCNC rates at the TeV scale.
  • Similar analysis strategies could be extended to rare decays of other heavy quarkonia once sufficient data become available.
  • Cross-checks between BESIII results and indirect constraints from B-factory or LHCb measurements would test consistency across different production mechanisms.

Load-bearing premise

The published analyses have correctly estimated all backgrounds, efficiencies, and systematic uncertainties so that the quoted upper limits accurately reflect the true experimental sensitivity.

What would settle it

An independent re-analysis of the same datasets or a new higher-luminosity run that observes a signal in any of the listed channels at a branching fraction below the current BESIII upper limit would invalidate the claimed sensitivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.22082 by Kaixin Fan, Minggang Zhao, Xuze Li, Yu Zhang, Zhengyun You.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Tree-level Feynman diagram for charmonium [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Tree-level Feynman diagram for charmonium [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Feynman diagram for charmonium FCNC decay [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The weak decays of charmonium, involving $J/\psi$ and $\psi(2S)$ states, are instrumental in probing both non-perturbative QCD dynamics and flavor structure of the standard model (SM). The extremely rare nature of charmonium weak decays makes them highly sensitive to new physics beyond the SM, particularly in channels heavily suppressed in the SM, such as flavor-changing neutral current (FCNC) decays. This review highlights the critical role of the BESIII experiment, which leverages an unprecedented dataset of over $10^{10}$ $J/\psi$ events and $2.7\times10^{9}$ $\psi(2S)$ events to push the sensitivity of charmonium weak decay searches. We present the latest and most stringent upper limits established by BESIII on various semi-leptonic, non-leptonic, and FCNC charmonium weak decay channels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This mini-review compiles and summarizes published BESIII experimental results on rare weak decays of the J/ψ and ψ(2S) charmonium states. It covers semi-leptonic, non-leptonic, and FCNC channels, emphasizing the large datasets (>10^10 J/ψ events and 2.7×10^9 ψ(2S) events) that enable the most stringent upper limits to date on these processes, which are sensitive to non-perturbative QCD and potential new physics.

Significance. As a concise compilation of existing BESIII limits rather than new data or derivations, the review offers a useful reference consolidating experimental progress in highly suppressed charmonium decays. It correctly positions the results as probes of SM flavor structure without introducing unsupported extrapolations.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the dataset sizes are stated without reference to the specific BESIII publications or run periods from which they derive; adding one-sentence citations here would improve traceability for readers.
  2. [Introduction] The review should explicitly note in the introduction or conclusion that all quoted limits are taken directly from the cited original analyses and have not been re-derived or combined here.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our mini-review, which correctly identifies it as a concise compilation of the most stringent BESIII upper limits on rare charmonium weak decays. We appreciate the recognition of its utility as a reference for SM flavor probes and non-perturbative QCD studies. No major comments were raised in the report, so we will address any minor editorial points in the revised version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper is a mini-review that compiles and summarizes already-published BESIII experimental upper limits on rare charmonium weak decays. It contains no derivations, predictions, fitted parameters, or first-principles calculations. All quoted limits are presented as external results from prior BESIII analyses rather than being re-derived or extrapolated within this manuscript. No self-citation chains, ansatzes, or renamings function as load-bearing steps; the review's claims rest on the existence of those independent experimental publications.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper summarizing experimental results; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5452 in / 1049 out tokens · 35475 ms · 2026-05-15T00:19:55.019083+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    X. Q. Li, X. Liu, and Z. T. Wei. Charm physics: A field full with challenges and opportunities. Front. Phys. China, 4:49, 2009. doi:10.1007/s11467-009-0003-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s11467-009-0003-0 2009

  2. [2]

    H. B. Li and S. H. Zhu. Mini-review of rare charmonium decays at BESIII. Chin. Phys. C , 36:932, 2012. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/10/003

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/36/10/003 2012

  3. [3]

    Y. Meng, J. L. Dang, C. Liu, et al. First lattice QCD calculation of J/ ψ semileptonic decay containing D and Ds particles. Phys. Rev. D , 110(7):074510, 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.074510

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.074510 2024

  4. [4]

    M. A. Sanchis-Lozano. On the search for weak decays of heavy quarkonium in dedicated heavy quark factories. Z. Phys. C , 62:271, 1994. doi:10.1007/BF01560243

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01560243 1994

  5. [5]

    Y. M. Wang, H. Zou, Z. T. Wei, et al. The Transition form-factors for semi-leptonic weak decays of J/ψ in QCD sum rules. Eur. Phys. J. C , 54:107, 2008. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0498-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0498-x 2008

  6. [6]

    Y. L. Shen and Y. M. Wang. J/ψ weak decays in the covariant light-front quark model. Phys. Rev. D , 78: 074012, 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.074012

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.074012 2008

  7. [7]

    Z. J. Sun, Z. Q. Zhang, Y. Y. Yang, et al. Semileptonic and nonleptonic weak decays of ψ(1S, 2S) and ηc(1S, 2S) to D(s) in the covariant light-front approach. Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(1):65, 2024. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12404- 6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12404- 2024

  8. [8]

    Dhir and R

    R. Dhir and R. C. Verma. Effects of Flavor Dependence on Weak Decays of J/ψ and Υ. Adv. High Energy Phys. , 2013:706543, 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/706543

    work page doi:10.1155/2013/706543 2013

  9. [9]

    M. A. Ivanov and C. T. Tran. Exclusive decays J/ψ→D(∗) (s) + in a covariant constituent quark model with infrared confinement. Phys. Rev. D , 92(7):074030, 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.074030

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.074030 2015

  10. [10]

    T. Wang, Y. Jiang, H. Yuan, et al. Weak decays of J/ψ and Υ(1S). J. Phys. G , 44(4):045004, 2017. doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/aa5f68

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/aa5f68 2017

  11. [11]

    K. K. Sharma and R. C. Verma. Rare decays of Ψ and Υ. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A , 14:937, 1999. doi: 10.1142/S0217751X99000464

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x99000464 1999

  12. [12]

    R. C. Verma, A. N. Kamal, and A. Czarnecki. Hadronic weak decays of Ψ. Phys. Lett. B , 252:690, 1990. doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(90)90507-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90507-3 1990

  13. [13]

    Y. M. Wang, H. Zou, Z. T. Wei, et al. Weak decays of J/ψ: The Non-leptonic case. Eur. Phys. J. C , 55:607,

    work page

  14. [14]

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0619-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0619-1

  15. [15]

    J. Sun, Y. Yang, J. Huang, et al. Study of the ψ(1s, 2s) and ηc(1s, 2s) weak decays into dm. Adv. High Energy Phys., 2016:5071671, 2016. doi:10.1155/2016/5071671

    work page doi:10.1155/2016/5071671 2016

  16. [16]

    Y. M. Wang, H. Zou, Z. T. Wei, et al. Fcnc- induced semileptonic decays of j/psi in the standard model. J. Phys. G , 36:105002, 2009. doi:10.1088/0954- 3899/36/10/105002

    work page doi:10.1088/0954- 2009

  17. [17]

    Li and Z

    Z. Li and Z. You. Rare charm decays at besiii, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11597

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Datta, P

    A. Datta, P. J. O’Donnell, S. Pakvasa, et al. Flavor changing processes in quarkonium decays. Phys. Rev. D , 60:014011, 1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.014011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.014011 1999

  19. [19]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Design and Construction of the BESIII Detector. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A , 614:345–399, 2010. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2009.12.050. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2009.12.050 2010

  20. [20]

    BEPCII Performance and Beam Dynamics Studies on Luminosity

    Chenghui Yu et al. BEPCII Performance and Beam Dynamics Studies on Luminosity. In the proceedings of the 7th International Particle Accelerator Conference ,

    work page

  21. [21]

    doi:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2016-TUYA01

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-ipac2016-tuya01

  22. [22]

    Predictions for bottomonium from a relativistic screened potential model,

    M. Ablikim et al. Number of J/ψ events at BESIII. Chin. Phys. C , 46(7):074001, 2022. doi:10.1088/1674- 1137/ac5c2e. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.1088/1674- 2022

  23. [23]

    M. H. Liao et al. Experimental dataset from BESIII detector at Beijing electron–positron collider. Nucl. Sci. Tech., 36(11):218, 2025. doi:10.1007/s41365-025-01789-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-025-01789-y 2025

  24. [24]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Determination of the number of ψ(3686) events taken at BESIII. Chin. Phys. C , 48(9): 8 093001, 2024. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad595b. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad595b 2024

  25. [25]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Search for the rare semi-leptonic decay J/ψ → D−e+νe + c.c.. JHEP, (06):157, 2021. doi: 10.1007/JHEP06(2021)157. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2021)157 2021

  26. [26]

    Binosi and L

    D. Binosi and L. Theußl. JaxoDraw: A Graph- ical user interface for drawing Feynman diagrams. Comput. Phys. Commun. , 161:76–86, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2004.05.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2004.05.001 2004

  27. [27]

    Navaset al.),Phys

    S. Navas et al. Review of particle physics. Phys. Rev. D , 110(3):030001, 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001. Particle Data Group

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  28. [28]

    C. T. Hill. Topcolor assisted technicolor. Phys. Lett. B , 345:483, 1995. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)01660-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)01660-5 1995

  29. [29]

    C. S. Aulakh and R. N. Mohapatra. Neutrino as the supersymmetric partner of the majoron. Phys. Lett. B , 119:136, 1982. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90262-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90262-3 1982

  30. [30]

    S. L. Glashow and S. Weinberg. Natural conservation laws for neutral currents. Phys. Rev. D , 15:1958, 1977. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.1958

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.1958 1958

  31. [31]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Search for the semi-muonic charmonium decay J/ψ → D−µ+νµ + c.c.. JHEP, (01):126, 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)126. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2024)126 2024

  32. [32]

    Search for the charmonium semi-leptonic weak decay $J/\psi\rightarrow D_s^-e^+\nu_e+c.c.$

    M. Ablikim et al. Search for the charmonium semi- leptonic weak decay J/ψ → D− s e+νe + c.c., 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25100. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Search for the weak decays J/ψ → D(∗) s eνe + c.c.. Phys. Rev. D , 90(11):112014, 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.112014. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.112014 2014

  34. [34]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Search for the charmonium weak decays J/ψ → D− s ρ+ + c.c. and J/ψ → D− s π+ + c.c.. JHEP, (12):077, 2025. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2025)077. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2025)077 2025

  35. [35]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Search for J/ ψ weak decays containing a D meson. Phys. Rev. D , 110(3):032020, 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.032020. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.032020 2024

  36. [36]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Search for the charmonium weak decay J/ψ → ¯D0 ¯K ∗0+c.c., 11 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2511.16083. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Search for the FCNC charmonium decay J/ ψ→ D0 µ+ µ-+ cc. JHEP, (04):061, 2025. doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2025)061. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2025)061 2025

  38. [38]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Search for the rare decays J/ψ → D0e+e− + c.c. and ψ(3686) → D0e+e− + c.c.. Phys. Rev. D , 96(11):111101, 2017. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.111101. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.111101 2017

  39. [39]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Search for the rare decay J/ψ→γD0+c.c. at BESIII. Phys. Rev. D, 110(11):112012,

    work page

  40. [40]

    (BESIII Collaboration)

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.112012. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.112012

  41. [41]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Search for the rare decay of ψ(3686) → Λ+ c pe+e− + c.c. at BESIII. Phys. Rev. D , 97(9):091102, 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.091102. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.091102 2018

  42. [42]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. Search for the weak decay ψ(3686) → Λ+ c ¯Σ− + c.c. Chin. Phys. C , 47(1):013002, 2023. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac9895. (BESIII Collaboration)

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac9895 2023

  43. [43]

    H. W. Ke, Y. Z. Chen, and X. Q. Li. The decay rate of J/ψ to Λc + ¯Σ+ in SM and beyond. Chin. Phys. Lett. , 28:071301, 2011. doi:10.1088/0256-307X/28/7/071301

    work page doi:10.1088/0256-307x/28/7/071301 2011

  44. [44]

    X. C. Ai et al. Conceptual design report of the Super Tau-Charm Facility: the accelerator. Nucl. Sci. Tech. , 36(12):242, 2025. doi:10.1007/s41365-025-01833-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-025-01833-x 2025