pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.22901 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-24 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · nucl-th

Finite-nuclear-size effect for hydrogenlike ions under high external pressure

Dengshan Liu , Huihui Xie , Pengxiang Du , Tianshuai Shang , Jian Li , Jiguang Li , Tomoya Naito This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph nucl-th
keywords finite nuclear size effecthydrogenlike ionshigh external pressureelectron capture decayDirac equationconfinement modelGaussian nuclear distribution
0
0 comments X

The pith

High pressure increases finite-nuclear-size corrections and electron-capture decay rates in hydrogenlike ions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how external pressure affects finite-nuclear-size corrections to energy levels and electron-capture decay rates in hydrogenlike ions. Ions are placed inside an impenetrable spherical cavity to simulate pressure, with the nuclear charge modeled by a Gaussian distribution. Numerical solutions of the Dirac equation reveal that both the corrections and decay rates rise sharply as confinement increases, in contrast to free ions. Pressure also lifts energy level degeneracies and makes the nuclear charge radius a major influence on the decay rate enhancement. This matters because it connects atomic structure under extreme conditions to nuclear decay processes.

Core claim

In contrast to unconfined ions, both the FNS corrections and electron-capture decay rates increase markedly under pressure and exhibit parallel trends with increasing confinement. Moreover, the nuclear charge radius is found to significantly affect the pressure-enhanced electron-capture decay rate. Pressure removes level degeneracies and alters the relative magnitudes of FNS corrections across different bound states.

What carries the argument

Numerical solution of the Dirac equation for ions confined in an impenetrable spherical cavity with Gaussian nuclear charge distribution, using the kinetically balanced generalized pseudospectral method.

If this is right

  • FNS corrections to atomic energy levels grow with increasing pressure.
  • Electron-capture decay rates increase in parallel with the FNS corrections.
  • Energy level degeneracies are lifted by the confinement.
  • The magnitude of the pressure effect depends on the nuclear charge radius.
  • Relative sizes of FNS corrections change between different states under pressure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This modeling suggests that high-pressure environments could accelerate certain nuclear decays in ions, relevant for dense matter physics.
  • Extensions to heavier ions or multi-electron systems might reveal similar pressure sensitivities.
  • Comparisons with astrophysical conditions like those in stellar cores could test the applicability.

Load-bearing premise

An impenetrable spherical cavity with a Gaussian nuclear charge distribution accurately represents the effect of high external pressure on real hydrogenlike ions.

What would settle it

Direct experimental comparison of electron-capture rates or spectral lines in hydrogenlike ions under controlled high pressure, such as in a diamond anvil cell, against the calculated trends for varying confinement radii.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.22901 by Dengshan Liu, Huihui Xie, Jian Li, Jiguang Li, Pengxiang Du, Tianshuai Shang, Tomoya Naito.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) and (b) display the absolute energy values |E1s| — which incorporates the FNS effect — and corresponding FNS correction to energy levels ∆EFNS for the ground state of hydro￾genlike ions 7Be3+ , 56Fe25+ , 120Sn49+ and 208Pb81+, respectively, as a function of pressure. The calculations cover a pressure range from 1 GPa to 1017 GPa. Owing to the significant variations in both the |E1s| and ∆EFNS across th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Absolute values of energy levels (a) and FNS correcti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: compares the FNS corrections to energy levels ∆EFNS for the 1s1/2 state of hydro￾genlike ions 7Be3+ and 120Sn49+ between the relativistic and nonrelativistic cases. The relativistic ∆EFNS is consistently greater than its nonrelativistic counterpart. Furthermore, the disparity in ∆EFNS attributable to relativistic effects intensifies significantly with increasing pressure. Beyond pressures of 1014 GPa, this… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The ratio of the electron-capture decay rate with and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The fractional increase of the decay rate at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The influence of pressure on finite-nuclear-size corrections to atomic energy levels and electron-capture decay rate is investigated in confined hydrogenlike ions. The ions are modeled inside an impenetrable spherical cavity, with a Gaussian distribution used to represent the nuclear charge distribution. For each confinement radius used to simulate external pressure, the energies and wave functions of the lowest-lying bound states are determined by numerically solving the Dirac equation via the kinetically balanced generalized pseudospectral method. In contrast to unconfined ions, both the FNS corrections and electron-capture decay rates increase markedly under pressure and exhibit parallel trends with increasing confinement. Pressure also removes level degeneracies and alters the relative magnitudes of FNS corrections across different bound states. Moreover, the nuclear charge radius is found to significantly affect the pressure-enhanced electron-capture decay rate.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a numerical study of finite-nuclear-size (FNS) effects in hydrogenlike ions confined within an impenetrable spherical cavity to model high external pressure. Employing a Gaussian nuclear charge distribution and solving the Dirac equation using the kinetically balanced generalized pseudospectral method, the authors report that FNS corrections to energy levels and electron-capture decay rates increase significantly with decreasing confinement radius, show parallel trends, that pressure lifts level degeneracies, and that the nuclear charge radius has a notable impact on the pressure-enhanced decay rates.

Significance. If the results hold, they indicate that external pressure can markedly enhance FNS corrections and decay rates in a manner distinct from unconfined ions, potentially relevant for high-pressure atomic physics. The direct numerical approach using a standard method for the confined Dirac equation is a strength, providing concrete trends for this model system. However, the applicability to real physical pressures depends on the validity of the hard-wall cavity approximation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical results] The manuscript does not report convergence tests, grid parameters, or error estimates for the pseudospectral calculations of energies and wave functions across different confinement radii. This omission is critical as the central claims of marked increases in FNS corrections and decay rates depend on the numerical accuracy of these computations.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that FNS corrections 'exhibit parallel trends with increasing confinement' but does not clarify whether this means increasing or decreasing confinement radius; explicit wording would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for highlighting the importance of documenting the numerical accuracy of our calculations. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested details in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical results] The manuscript does not report convergence tests, grid parameters, or error estimates for the pseudospectral calculations of energies and wave functions across different confinement radii. This omission is critical as the central claims of marked increases in FNS corrections and decay rates depend on the numerical accuracy of these computations.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of convergence behavior, grid parameters, and error estimates is necessary to substantiate the numerical results. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection to the Methods section that specifies the grid parameters (number of collocation points, mapping parameter, and radial extent) employed in the kinetically balanced generalized pseudospectral discretization for each confinement radius. We will also present convergence tables demonstrating that the computed energies and radial wave functions stabilize to at least 10^{-12} a.u. when the number of grid points is increased, together with estimated numerical uncertainties for the finite-nuclear-size energy shifts and electron-capture rates at representative pressures. These additions will confirm that the reported pressure-induced enhancements are not affected by discretization errors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from direct numerical solution of Dirac equation

full rationale

The paper derives FNS corrections and electron-capture rates by numerically solving the Dirac equation for hydrogenlike ions confined in an impenetrable spherical cavity with a Gaussian nuclear charge distribution, using the kinetically balanced generalized pseudospectral method. No parameters are fitted to the reported quantities, no self-citations bear the central load, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in to force the outcomes. The parallel trends with confinement radius and the sensitivity to nuclear radius follow directly from the boundary-value solutions for varying R. This is a standard self-contained computational study; the model assumptions affect physical fidelity but do not create circularity in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Dirac equation for relativistic electrons and the modeling choice of an impenetrable spherical cavity; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • confinement radius
    Varied parametrically to simulate increasing external pressure; controls the strength of confinement.
  • Gaussian nuclear width
    Parameter of the nuclear charge distribution; its value is shown to affect the magnitude of the pressure-enhanced decay rate.
axioms (2)
  • standard math The Dirac equation accurately describes the bound states of hydrogenlike ions
    Invoked when solving for energies and wave functions inside the cavity.
  • domain assumption An impenetrable spherical cavity models the effect of high external pressure
    Stated as the way to simulate pressure on the ion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5452 in / 1350 out tokens · 30227 ms · 2026-05-15T00:54:51.587997+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Andrae, Finite nuclear charge density distributions in electronic structure calculations for atoms and molecules, Phys

    D. Andrae, Finite nuclear charge density distributions in electronic structure calculations for atoms and molecules, Phys. Rep. 336, 413 (2000)

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Andrae, in Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, V ol

    D. Andrae, in Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, V ol. 11 (Elsevier, 2002) p. 203

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    V . M. Shabaev, Finite nuclear size corrections to the ene rgy levels of the multicharged ions, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 26, 1103 (1993)

    work page 1993

  4. [4]

    R. T. Deck, J. G. Amar, and G. Fralick, Nuclear size correc tions to the energy levels of single-electron and -muon atoms, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38, 2173 (2005)

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    B. N. Niri and A. Anjami, Nuclear size corrections to the e nergy levels of single-electron atoms, Nucl. Sci. 3, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    I. A. V aluev, Z. Harman, C. H. Keitel, and N. S. Oreshkina, Skyrme-type nuclear interaction as a tool for calculating the finite-nuclear-size correction to atomic energy levels and the bound-electron g factor, Phys. Rev. A 101, 062502 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    H. H. Xie, J. Li, L. G. Jiao, and Y . K. Ho, Finite-nuclear-s ize effect in hydrogenlike ions with rela- tivistic nuclear structure, Phys. Rev. A 107, 042807 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Kuzmenko, T

    I. Kuzmenko, T. Kuzmenko, Y . Avishai, and Y . B. Band, Hydrogen and hydrogenlike-ion bound states and hyperfine splittings: Finite-nuclear-size effects, Phys. Rev. A 108, 052804 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Nit ¸escu, S

    O. Nit ¸escu, S. Ghinescu, and S. Stoica, Lorentz violati on effects in 2 νββ decay, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 47, 055112 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Nit ¸escu, R

    O. Nit ¸escu, R. Dvornick´ y, and F.ˇSimkovic, Atomic corrections for the unique first-forbidde n β tran- sition of 187Re, Phys. Rev. C 109, 025501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Bambynek, H

    W. Bambynek, H. Behrens, M. H. Chen, B. Crasemann, M. L. F itzpatrick, K. W. D. Led- ingham, H. Genz, M. Mutterer, and R. L. Intemann, Orbital ele ctron capture by the nucleus, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 77 (1977)

    work page 1977

  12. [12]

    Sarriguren, Electron-capture decay in isotopic tra nsfermium chains from self-consistent calcula- tions, J

    P . Sarriguren, Electron-capture decay in isotopic tra nsfermium chains from self-consistent calcula- tions, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 47, 125107 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    M. I. Eides, H. Grotch, and V . A. Shelyuto, Theory of ligh t hydrogenlike atoms, Physics Reports 342, 63 (2001)

    work page 2001

  14. [14]

    Beier, H

    T. Beier, H. H¨ affner, N. Hermanspahn, S. G. Karshenboi m, H.-J. Kluge, W. Quint, S. Stahl, J. V erd´ u, 12 and G. Werth, New determination of the electron’s mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 011603 (2001)

    work page 2001

  15. [15]

    Sturm, F

    S. Sturm, F. K¨ ohler, J. Zatorski, A. Wagner, Z. Harman, G. Werth, W. Quint, C. Keitel, and K. Blaum, High-precision measurement of the atomic mass of the electr on, Nature 506, 467 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    N. S. Oreshkina, S. M. Cavaletto, N. Michel, Z. Harman, a nd C. H. Keitel, Hyperfine splitting in simple ions for the search of the variation of fundamental constant s, Phys. Rev. A 96, 030501(R) (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    A. V . V olotka and G. Plunien, Nuclear polarization stud y: New frontiers for tests of QED in heavy highly charged ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 023002 (2014)

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    Indelicato, QED tests with highly charged ions, J

    P . Indelicato, QED tests with highly charged ions, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 52, 232001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Blaum, S

    K. Blaum, S. Eliseev, and S. Sturm, Perspectives on test ing fundamental physics with highly charged ions in penning traps, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 014002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    N. Paul, G. Bian, T. Azuma, S. Okada, and P . Indelicato, Testing quantum electrodynamics with exotic atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 173001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Sailer, V

    T. Sailer, V . Debierre, Z. Harman, F. Heiße, C. K¨ onig, J. Morgner, B. Tu, A. V . V olotka, C. H. Keitel, K. Blaum, and S. Sturm, Measurement of the bound-electron g- factor difference in coupled ions, Nature 606, 479 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    F. A. Parpia and W. R. Johnson, Radiative decay rates of m etastable one-electron atoms, Phys. Rev. A 26, 1142 (1982)

    work page 1982

  23. [23]

    Popov and A

    R. Popov and A. Maiorova, Relativistic calculations of one-photon transition probabilities in hydrogen-like ions, Opt. Spectrosc. 122, 366 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Sommerfeldt, R

    J. Sommerfeldt, R. A. M¨ uller, A. V . V olotka, S. Fritzsc he, and A. Surzhykov, V acuum polarization and finite-nuclear-size effects in the two-ph oton decay of hydrogenlike ions, Phys. Rev. A 102, 042811 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Michels, J

    A. Michels, J. De Boer, and A. Bijl, Remarks concerning m olecural interaction and their influence on the polarisability, Physica 4, 981 (1937)

    work page 1937

  26. [26]

    Ley-Koo and S

    E. Ley-Koo and S. Rubinstein, The hydrogen atom within s pherical boxes with penetrable walls, J. Chem. Phys. 71, 351 (1979)

    work page 1979

  27. [27]

    M. N. Guimar˜ aes and F. V . Prudente, A study of the confine d hydrogen atom using the finite element method, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38, 2811 (2005)

    work page 2005

  28. [28]

    Cabrera-Trujillo and S

    R. Cabrera-Trujillo and S. A. Cruz, Confinement approac h to pressure effects on the dipole and the generalized oscillator strength of atomic hydrogen, Phys. Rev. A 87, 012502 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Goldman and C

    S. Goldman and C. Joslin, Spectroscopic properties of a n isotropically compressed hydrogen atom, 13 J. Phys. Chem. 96, 6021 (1992)

    work page 1992

  30. [30]

    Laughlin, On the dipole polarizability of a hydrogen -like atom confined in an impenetrable spheri- cal box, J

    C. Laughlin, On the dipole polarizability of a hydrogen -like atom confined in an impenetrable spheri- cal box, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37, 4085 (2004)

    work page 2004

  31. [31]

    Montgomery and K

    H. Montgomery and K. Sen, Dipole polarizabilities for a hydrogen atom confined in a penetrable sphere, Phys. Lett. A 376, 1992 (2012)

    work page 1992

  32. [32]

    J. A. Ludlow and T.-G. Lee, Investigating the static dip ole polarizability of noble-gas atoms confined in impenetrable spheres and shells, Phys. Rev. A 91, 032507 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Aquino, R

    N. Aquino, R. Rojas, and H. Montgomery, The energy corre ction due to a finite size nucleus of the hydrogen atom confined in a penetrable spherical cavity, Rev. Mex. Fis. 64, 399 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Takahashi and K

    K. Takahashi and K. Y okoi, Nuclear β -decays of highly ionized heavy atoms in stellar interiors, Nucl. Phys. A 404, 578 (1983)

    work page 1983

  35. [35]

    W. R. Phillips, I. Ahmad, D. W. Banes, B. G. Glagola, W. He nning, W. Kutschera, K. E. Rehm, J. P . Schiffer, and T. F. Wang, Charge-state depen dence of nuclear lifetimes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1025 (1989)

    work page 1989

  36. [36]

    L. M. Folan and V . I. Tsifrinovich, Effects of the hyperfi ne interaction on orbital electron capture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 499 (1995)

    work page 1995

  37. [37]

    Y . A. Litvinov, F. Bosch, H. Geissel, J. Kurcewicz, Z. Pa tyk, N. Winckler, L. Batist, K. Beck- ert, D. Boutin, C. Brandau, L. Chen, C. Dimopoulou, B. Fabian , T. Faestermann, A. Frag- ner, L. Grigorenko, E. Haettner, S. Hess, P . Kienle, R. Kn¨ ob el, C. Kozhuharov, S. A. Litvinov, L. Maier, M. Mazzocco, F. Montes, G. M¨ unzenberg, A. Musumar ra, C. Noc...

    work page 2007

  38. [38]

    Patyk, J

    Z. Patyk, J. Kurcewicz, F. Bosch, H. Geissel, Y . A. Litvi nov, and M. Pf¨ utzner, Orbital electron capture decay of hydrogen- and helium-like ions, Phys. Rev. C 77, 014306 (2008)

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    A. N. Ivanov, M. Faber, R. Reda, and P . Kienle, Weak decays of H-like 140Pr58+ and He-like 140Pr57+ ions, Phys. Rev. C 78, 025503 (2008)

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    Winckler, H

    N. Winckler, H. Geissel, Y . Litvinov, K. Beckert, F. Bos ch, D. Boutin, C. Brandau, L. Chen, C. Di- mopoulou, H. Essel, B. Fabian, T. Faestermann, A. Fragner, E. Haettner, S. Hess, P . Kienle, R. Kn¨ obel, C. Kozhuharov, S. Litvinov, M. Mazzocco, F. Montes, G. M¨ unz enberg, C. Nociforo, F. Nolden, 14 Z. Patyk, W. Plaß, A. Prochazka, R. Reda, R. Reuschl,...

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    Siegie´ n-Iwaniuk, N

    K. Siegie´ n-Iwaniuk, N. Winckler, F. Bosch, H. Geissel, Y . A. Litvinov, and Z. Patyk, Orbital electron capture of hydrogen- and helium-like ions, Phys. Rev. C 84, 014301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    Bosch, D

    F. Bosch, D. R. Atanasov, C. Brandau, I. Dillmann, C. Dim opoulou, T. Faestermann, H. Geissel, S. Hagmann, P .-M. Hillenbrand, P . Kienle, R. Kn¨ obel, C. Kozhuharov, J. Kurcewicz, M. Lestinsky, S. A. Litvinov, Y . A. Litvinov, X. Ma, F. Nolden, T. Ohtsubo, Z . Patyk, R. Reuschl, M. S. Sanjari, C. Scheidenberger, D. Shubina, U. Spillmann, M. Steck, T. St ...

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Ozturk, B

    F. Ozturk, B. Akkus, D. Atanasov, H. Beyer, F. Bosch, D. B outin, C. Brandau, P . B¨ uhler, R. Cakirli, R. Chen, W. Chen, X. Chen, I. Dillmann, C. Dimopoulou, W. Ende rs, H. Essel, T. Faestermann, O. Forstner, B. Gao, H. Geissel, R. Gernh¨ auser, R. Grisenti, A. Gumberidze, S. Hagmann, T. Heftrich, M. Heil, M. Herdrich, P .-M. Hillenbrand, T. Izumikawa, P...

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    W. K. Hensley, W. A. Bassett, and J. R. Huizenga, Pressur e dependence of the radioactive decay constant of beryllium-7, Science 181, 1164 (1973)

    work page 1973

  45. [45]

    gun Liu and C.-A

    L. gun Liu and C.-A. Huh, Effect of pressure on the decay r ate of 7Be, Earth Plan. Sci. Lett. 180, 163 (2000)

    work page 2000

  46. [46]

    K. K. Lee and G. Steinle-Neumann, Ab-initio study of the effects of pressure and chemistry on the electron-capture radioactive decay const ants of 7Be, 22Na and 40K, Earth Plan. Sci. Lett. 267, 628 (2008) . 15

    work page 2008

  47. [47]

    A. Ray, P . Das, A. Sikdar, S. Pathak, N. Aquino, M. Lozano-Espinosa, and A. Artemyev, Electron cap- ture nuclear decay rate under compression in a confined envir onment, Eur. Phys. J. D 75, 140 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Ohtsuki, H

    T. Ohtsuki, H. Y uki, M. Muto, J. Kasagi, and K. Ohno, Enha nced electron-capture decay rate of 7Be encapsulated in c60 cages, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 112501 (2004)

    work page 2004

  49. [49]

    Ohtsuki, K

    T. Ohtsuki, K. Ohno, T. Morisato, T. Mitsugashira, K. Hi rose, H. Y uki, and J. Kasagi, Ra- dioactive decay speedup at t = 5 K : Electron-capture decay rate of 7Be encapsulated in c60, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 252501 (2007)

    work page 2007

  50. [50]

    Morisato, K

    T. Morisato, K. Ohno, T. Ohtsuki, K. Hirose, M. Sluiter, and Y . Kawazoe, Electron-capture decay rate of 7Be@c60 by first-principles calculations based on density function al theory, Phys. Rev. B 78, 125416 (2008)

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    Kuwahara, K

    R. Kuwahara, K. Ohno, and T. Ohtsuki, Electron-capture decay rate of 7Be in cluster and crystal forms of beryllium: A first-principles study, Phys. Rev. C 109, 024609 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    T. S. Shang, H. H. Xie, J. Li, and H. Liang, Global predict ion of nuclear charge density distributions using a deep neural network, Phys. Rev. C 110, 014308 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    T. S. Shang, J. Li, and Z. M. Niu, Prediction of nuclear ch arge density distribution with feedback neural network, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 153 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Y . D. Wang, T. S. Shang, H. H. Xie, P . X. Du, J. Li, and H. Z. L iang, Predictions of charge density distributions for nuclei with Z ≥ 8, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 37, 93 (2026)

    work page 2026

  55. [55]

    L. G. Jiao, Y . Y . He, A. Liu, Y . Z. Zhang, and Y . K. Ho, Development of the kinetically and atomically balanced generalized pseudospectral method, Phys. Rev. A 104, 022801 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    Chu and D

    S.-I. Chu and D. A. Telnov, Beyond the floquet theorem: ge neralized floquet formalisms and quasienergy methods for atomic and molecular multiphoton p rocesses in intense laser fields, Phys. Rep. 390, 1 (2004)

    work page 2004

  57. [57]

    H. H. Xie, L. G. Jiao, A. Liu, and Y . K. Ho, High-precision calculation of relativistic corrections for hydrogen-like atoms with screened coulomb potentials, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 121, e26653 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    L. G. Jiao, H. H. Xie, A. Liu, H. E. Montgomery, and Y . K. Ho , Critical screening pa- rameters and critical behaviors of one-electron systems wi th screened coulomb potentials, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 54, 175002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    L. Zhu, Y . Y . He, L. G. Jiao, Y . C. Wang, and Y . K. Ho, Revisi ting the generalized pseudospec- tral method: Radial expectation values, fine structure, and hyperfine splitting of confined atom, Int J Quantum Chem. 120, e26245 (2020) . 16

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    C. Wang, T. Naito, J. Li, and H. Liang, A deep neural netwo rk approach to solve the dirac equation, Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 162 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    C. Wang, T. Naito, J. Li, and H. Liang, A neural network approach for two-body systems with spin and isospin degrees of (2024), arXiv:2403.16819

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Wigner and H

    E. Wigner and H. B. Huntington, On the possibility of a me tallic modification of hydrogen, The Journal of Chemical Physics 3, 764 (1935) . 17

    work page 1935