Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 133 references

Four intermediate-redshift lensing clusters share compatible Schechter velocity-dispersion functions for red members once the Fundamental Plane assigns σ to the full sample.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 17:22 UTC pith:DFMARLTP

load-bearing objection Solid HFF measurement paper: MUSE σ catalogue plus FP-assigned VDFs to log σ=1.5; useful for lens modelers, not a field reorg. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2603.26869 v3 pith:DFMARLTP submitted 2026-03-27 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

The velocity dispersion function of red galaxies in four Hubble Frontier Fields galaxy clusters

G. Granata , L. Tortorelli , C. Grillo , P. Rosati , M. D'Addona , A. Mercurio , G. Angora , P. Bergamini
show 1 more author
G. B. Caminha
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords galaxy clustersvelocity dispersion functionFundamental PlaneHubble Frontier FieldsMUSEred sequenceearly-type galaxiesstellar kinematics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper maps the central stellar velocity dispersions of red galaxies in the cores of four Hubble Frontier Fields clusters at 0.3 < z < 0.54. Direct MUSE measurements give reliable σ for 213 members; a rest-frame r-band Fundamental Plane calibrated on colour- and morphology-selected early-types then supplies σ for every one of the 723 red members. The resulting velocity dispersion functions reach log σ [km s⁻¹] = 1.5 and are each well fit by a Schechter form whose faint-end slope and characteristic σ* agree across the four clusters. The work therefore claims that the low-σ end of the cluster red-sequence kinematics is measurable and universal at these redshifts, something earlier surveys could not reach systematically.

Core claim

After calibrating the rest-frame r-band Fundamental Plane on early-type members with measured σ, assigning σ to all 723 red members produces velocity dispersion functions for the four HFF clusters that are well described by Schechter functions with mutually compatible parameters (α ≈ 0.55–1.60, log σ* ≈ 2.18–2.47) down to log σ [km s⁻¹] = 1.5.

What carries the argument

The rest-frame r-band Fundamental Plane of early-type cluster members, calibrated on the 213 galaxies with MUSE σ and structural parameters from MORPHOFIT, then used to assign a velocity dispersion to every red member.

Load-bearing premise

The Fundamental Plane fitted to brighter, morphologically early-type galaxies with good spectra still gives unbiased σ when applied to the whole red-member sample, including fainter and morphologically mixed objects that lack direct kinematics.

What would settle it

Obtain independent high-S/N velocity dispersions for a statistically useful subset of the lower-luminosity red members that currently receive only FP-assigned σ, and test whether those measured values systematically deviate from the FP predictions used to build the Schechter functions.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The low-σ end of the red-sequence VDF in cluster cores can be treated as Schechter-like and roughly universal across these four systems at intermediate redshift.
  • Cluster strong-lensing mass models that need galaxy-scale kinematics can draw on FP-assigned σ for hundreds of red members rather than only the spectroscopically measured minority.
  • Hints of Fundamental Plane zero-point evolution with redshift become testable once larger multi-cluster samples use the same rest-frame r calibration.
  • Comparisons between cluster and field velocity dispersion functions can now be pushed below the previous σ floor of direct surveys.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the positive Schechter α persists in larger samples, the abundance of low-σ red galaxies in cores may constrain how efficiently environmental quenching builds the faint red sequence.
  • Tension between FP-assigned and future direct σ at low luminosity would flag either structural non-homology or colour selection bias rather than a failure of the Schechter description itself.
  • The same MORPHOFIT-plus-pPXF pipeline is portable to other MUSE cluster programmes, so the claimed compatibility of α and σ* can be checked cluster-by-cluster outside the Frontier Fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The abstract reports a kinematic study of 723 red member galaxies in the cores of four Hubble Frontier Fields clusters (0.3 ≲ z ≲ 0.54). Structural parameters are measured with MORPHOFIT; line-of-sight stellar velocity dispersions σ are obtained for 213 members with MUSE/pPXF at S/N ≥ 10 (statistical errors <5%). A rest-frame r-band Fundamental Plane is calibrated on colour- and morphology-selected early-type members, found to be compatible across clusters with hints of zero-point evolution, and is then used to assign σ to the full red sample. The resulting velocity dispersion functions are fit by Schechter functions down to log σ [km s⁻¹] = 1.5, with α in 0.55–1.60 and log σ* in 2.18–2.47. The claimed advance is systematic extension of cluster-galaxy central-σ studies into the low-σ regime.

Significance. If the FP-based assignment is unbiased and the Schechter parameters are robust, the work would supply useful empirical VDFs for intermediate-redshift cluster cores, relevant both to galaxy evolution and to strong-lensing mass models that treat member galaxies as scaled mass components. Extending the VDF systematically below the usual spectroscopic floor is a worthwhile goal. The abstract alone, however, does not establish that the result holds: the full methods, residual diagnostics, completeness treatment, and error budgets are not available for audit in the supplied manuscript package (which contains an unrelated condensed-matter text). Significance therefore remains conditional on verification of the FP extrapolation and selection function.

major comments (4)
  1. Central claim depends on assigning σ via the FP to ~510 of 723 red members that lack direct kinematics. The abstract states the FP is calibrated on colour+morphology early-types with measured σ, then applied to all red members. Without residual plots, morphology-mix tests, or a hold-out comparison of FP-predicted vs measured σ at the faint/low-σ end, it is not shown that this extrapolation is unbiased for lower-luminosity or morphologically mixed red galaxies. This is load-bearing for the low-σ VDF (log σ down to 1.5).
  2. The reported Schechter α range 0.55–1.60 is very broad for a claim of 'compatible parameters' across four clusters. Compatibility needs a quantitative joint-fit or posterior-overlap test (with covariance between α and σ*), not only per-cluster point estimates. If α is poorly constrained or selection-driven at low σ, the joint interpretation weakens.
  3. The abstract does not specify completeness corrections, membership purity, aperture corrections for σ, or how FP zero-point evolution with redshift is folded into the assigned-σ error budget. These control the shape of the VDF at log σ ≲ 2 and must be documented and propagated before the Schechter parameters can be trusted.
  4. The supplied full-text block is a different paper (arXiv:2603.26870 on DMRG effective Hamiltonians), not the HFF VDF manuscript. A proper technical audit of equations, figures, tables, and selection functions is therefore impossible from the materials provided; the recommendation below reflects that limitation.
minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract typo: 'included in the the Hubble Frontier Fields programme' (duplicate 'the').
  2. Abstract phrasing 'noting hints of zero-point evolution with redshift' should be quantified (Δzp per unit z and significance) once the full text is available.
  3. Clarify whether the Schechter VDF is number density per cluster core volume or a projected/core-normalized count, and the exact radial aperture used for membership.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: FP-calibrated σ assignment to the full red-member sample is a transparent estimator, not a self-definitional or fitted-input-as-prediction loop.

full rationale

Only the abstract of arXiv:2603.26869 is available for audit (the CACHEABLE PAPER SOURCE CONTEXT contains an unrelated condensed-matter manuscript). From that abstract the load-bearing chain is: (i) structural parameters for 723 red members; (ii) direct pPXF σ for 213 members with S/N≥10; (iii) rest-frame r-band Fundamental Plane calibrated on colour+morphology-selected early-types; (iv) FP used to assign σ to the remaining members; (v) Schechter fits to the resulting VDFs. Step (iv) is an explicit, standard use of a calibrated scaling relation as an estimator, not a claim that the VDF or its Schechter parameters are first-principles predictions independent of the FP. The Schechter (α, σ*) parameters are not forced by construction from the FP coefficients: they encode the joint distribution of sizes and luminosities of the full red sample after transformation through the FP. There is no self-definitional identity, no fitted subset re-presented as an independent prediction of the same quantity, no uniqueness theorem imported from overlapping authors, and no renaming of a known result. The abstract is transparent about the assignment step. Score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review. Load-bearing ingredients are standard extragalactic assumptions (red members as early-type dominated, FP as a usable σ predictor, Schechter form for the VDF) plus free parameters of the FP and Schechter fits. No new physical entities are introduced. The main modeling leap is applying the ETG-calibrated FP to the full red sample.

free parameters (3)
  • Fundamental Plane coefficients (slope and zero point per cluster / joint fit) = Compatible across clusters; zero-point hints of redshift evolution (values not given in abstract)
    Calibrated on spectroscopically measured early-type members; used to assign σ to the full red sample and thus control the VDF.
  • Schechter VDF parameters α and σ* = α in 0.55–1.60; log σ* in 2.18–2.47
    Fitted to the constructed velocity dispersion functions; central quantitative result of the paper.
  • Spectral S/N threshold for direct σ measurement = S/N ≥ 10
    Selection cut S/N≥10 defines the 213-object kinematic subsample that anchors the FP.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The Fundamental Plane relating effective radius, surface brightness, and central velocity dispersion holds for the selected early-type cluster members in rest-frame r band.
    Standard empirical relation used as the bridge from photometry to σ for galaxies without spectra.
  • domain assumption Colour- and morphology-selected red early-type members are a sufficiently homogeneous population that one FP calibration can be applied across each cluster core sample.
    Required to justify assigning σ to all 723 red members from an ETG-calibrated plane.
  • ad hoc to paper The velocity dispersion function of red cluster members is well described by a Schechter function down to log σ = 1.5.
    Functional form chosen for the fit; abstract reports successful Schechter fits but does not demonstrate uniqueness versus other forms.
  • domain assumption pPXF spectral fitting on MUSE data yields unbiased line-of-sight stellar σ at the stated S/N with statistical errors below 5%.
    Measurement foundation for the 213 direct σ values that calibrate the FP.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 15772 in / 3090 out tokens · 33049 ms · 2026-07-13T17:22:11.738520+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a detailed study of the stellar kinematic properties of red member galaxies in the cores of four strong lensing galaxy clusters at intermediate redshifts included in the the Hubble Frontier Fields programme: Abell 2744 ($z=0.307$), Abell S1063 ($z=0.346$), MACS J0416.1$-$2403 ($z=0.397$), and MACS J1149.6$+$2223 ($z=0.542$). We focussed on a sample of 723 red cluster members in the four clusters and we measured their structural parameters using MORPHOFIT for all Hubble Frontier Fields bands. Taking advantage of deep (3.1 h to 17 h of exposure) integral-field spectroscopy from MUSE on the Very Large Telescope, we tested a pipeline based on the public spectral fitting code pPXF to systematically measure the line-of-sight stellar velocity dispersion $\sigma$ of cluster members with a spectral $S/N\geq 10$, with a statistical uncertainty consistently below 5%. The resulting catalogue contains 213 measured $\sigma$ values across the four clusters. We calibrated the Fundamental Plane relation in the rest-frame $r$ band for the early-type cluster members, selected from their colour and morphology; we found compatible parameters both across the clusters, and noting hints of zero-point evolution with redshift. Finally, we used the calibrated Fundamental Plane relations to assign a velocity dispersion value to all 723 red cluster members and studied the velocity dispersion function for each cluster, down to $\log \sigma \, \mathrm{[km \, s^{-1}] = 1.5}$. A Schechter function fit of the velocity functions suggests compatible parameters: a positive $\alpha$ slope with values in the range $0.55-1.60$, and $\log\sigma^*\, [\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}]$ between $2.18$ and $2.47$. Unlike previous works, we extended the systematic study of the central velocity dispersion of cluster galaxies to lower-$\sigma$ regimes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

133 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Hudomal, A

    A. Hudomal, A. Daniel, T. S. do Espirito Santo, M. Ko- rnjaˇ ca, T. Macr` ı, J. C. Halimeh, G.-X. Su, A. Balaˇ z, and Z. Papi´ c, Ergodicity breaking meets criticality in a gauge-theory quantum simulator, arXiv:2512.23794 [cond-mat.quant-gas] (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Roushan, C

    P. Roushan, C. Neill, J. Tangpanitanon, V. M. Bastidas, A. Megrant, R. Barends, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Fowler, B. Foxen, M. Giustina, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, J. Mutus, M. Nee- ley, C. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. White, H. Neven, D. G. Angelakis, and J. Martinis, Spectroscopic signatures of localization ...

    2017

  3. [3]

    Q. Guo, C. Cheng, Z.-H. Sun, Z. Song, H. Li, Z. Wang, W. Ren, H. Dong, D. Zheng, Y.-R. Zhang, R. Mondaini, H. Fan, and H. Wang, Observation of energy-resolved many-body localization, Nat. Phys.��, 234 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Y. Yao, L. Xiang, Z. Guo, Z. Bao, Y.-F. Yang, Z. Song, H. Shi, X. Zhu, F. Jin, J. Chen, S. Xu, Z. Zhu, F. Shen, N. Wang, C. Zhang, Y. Wu, Y. Zou, P. Zhang, H. Li, Z. Wang, C. Song, C. Cheng, R. Mondaini, H. Wang, J. Q. You, S.-Y. Zhu, L. Ying, and Q. Guo, Observation of many-body Fock space dynamics in two dimensions, Nat. Phys.��, 1459 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Dong, J.-Y

    H. Dong, J.-Y. Desaules, Y. Gao, N. Wang, Z. Guo, J. Chen, Y. Zou, F. Jin, X. Zhu, P. Zhang, H. Li, Z. Wang, Q. Guo, J. Zhang, L. Ying, and Z. Papi´ c, Disorder-tunable entanglement at infinite temperature, Sci. Adv.�, eadj3822 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Nagao, T

    K. Nagao, T. Shirakawa, R. Sun, P. Prelovˇ sek, and S. Yunoki, Probing many-body localization crossover in quasiperiodic Floquet circuits on a quantum processor, arXiv:2603.12675 [quant-ph] (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Chepiga and F

    N. Chepiga and F. Mila, Excitation spectrum and den- sity matrix renormalization group iterations, Phys. Rev. B��, 054425 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    A. A. Eberharter, L. Vanderstraeten, F. Verstraete, and A. M. L¨ auchli, Extracting the Speed of Light from Matrix Product States, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 226502 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    Cocchiarella, M

    D. Cocchiarella, M. Yang, Y. Zhang, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, H.- H. Tu, and Y. Liu, Excited states from local effective Hamiltonians of matrix product states and their entan- glement spectrum transition, arXiv:2511.16746 [cond- mat.str-el] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    ˇZnidariˇ c, T

    M. ˇZnidariˇ c, T. Prosen, and P. Prelovˇ sek, Many-body localization in the HeisenbergXXZmagnet in a ran- dom field, Phys. Rev. B��, 064426 (2008)

    2008

  11. [11]

    J. H. Bardarson, F. Pollmann, and J. E. Moore, Un- bounded Growth of Entanglement in Models of Many- Body Localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 017202 (2012)

    2012

  12. [12]

    Kloss, Y

    B. Kloss, Y. B. Lev, and D. Reichman, Time-dependent variational principle in matrix-product state manifolds: Pitfalls and potential, Phys. Rev. B��, 024307 (2018)

    2018

  13. [13]

    E. V. H. Doggen, F. Schindler, K. S. Tikhonov, A. D. Mirlin, T. Neupert, D. G. Polyakov, and I. V. Gornyi, Many-body localization and delocalization in large quantum chains, Phys. Rev. B��, 174202 (2018)

    2018

  14. [14]

    Chanda, P

    T. Chanda, P. Sierant, and J. Zakrzewski, Time dynam- ics with matrix product states: Many-body localization transition of large systems revisited, Phys. Rev. B���, 035148 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    Sierant and J

    P. Sierant and J. Zakrzewski, Challenges to observation of many-body localization, Phys. Rev. B���, 224203 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    Andraschko, T

    F. Andraschko, T. Enss, and J. Sirker, Purification and Many-Body Localization in Cold Atomic Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 217201 (2014)

    2014

  17. [17]

    T. Enss, F. Andraschko, and J. Sirker, Many-body lo- calization in infinite chains, Phys. Rev. B��, 045121 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    Khemani, F

    V. Khemani, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Obtain- ing Highly Excited Eigenstates of Many-Body Localized Hamiltonians by the Density Matrix Renormalization Group Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 247204 (2016)

    2016

  19. [19]

    S. P. Lim and D. N. Sheng, Many-body localization and transition by density matrix renormalization group and exact diagonalization studies, Phys. Rev. B��, 045111 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    Serbyn, A

    M. Serbyn, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papi´ c, Power-Law Entanglement Spectrum in Many- Body Localized Phases, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 160601 (2016)

    2016

  21. [21]

    X. Yu, D. Pekker, and B. K. Clark, Finding Matrix Product State Representations of Highly Excited Eigen- states of Many-Body Localized Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 017201 (2017)

    2017

  22. [22]

    Villalonga, X

    B. Villalonga, X. Yu, D. J. Luitz, and B. K. Clark, Ex- ploring one-particle orbitals in large many-body local- ized systems, Phys. Rev. B��, 104406 (2018)

    2018

  23. [23]

    Zhang, D

    S.-Y. Zhang, D. Yuan, T. Iadecola, S. Xu, and D.-L. Deng, Extracting Quantum Many-Body Scarred Eigen- states with Matrix Product States, Phys. Rev. Lett. ���, 020402 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    D. J. Luitz and Y. B. Lev, The ergodic side of the many- body localization transition, Annalen der Physik���, 1600350 (2017)

    2017

  25. [25]

    Alet and N

    F. Alet and N. Laflorencie, Many-body localization: An introduction and selected topics, C.R. Phys.��, 498 (2018)

    2018

  26. [26]

    Sierant, M

    P. Sierant, M. Lewenstein, A. Scardicchio, L. Vidmar, and J. Zakrzewski, Many-body localization in the age of classical computing, Rep. Prog. Phys.��, 026502 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Serbyn, Z

    M. Serbyn, Z. Papi´ c, and D. A. Abanin, Local Conser- vation Laws and the Structure of the Many-Body Lo- calized States, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 127201 (2013)

    2013

  28. [28]

    D. A. Huse, R. Nandkishore, and V. Oganesyan, Phenomenology of fully many-body-localized systems, Phys. Rev. B��, 174202 (2014)

    2014

  29. [29]

    Pollmann, V

    F. Pollmann, V. Khemani, J. I. Cirac, and S. L. Sondhi, Efficient variational diagonalization of fully many-body localized Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. B��, 041116 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    Pekker and B

    D. Pekker and B. K. Clark, Encoding the structure of many-body localization with matrix product operators, Phys. Rev. B��, 035116 (2017)

    2017

  31. [31]

    T. B. Wahl, A. Pal, and S. H. Simon, Efficient Repre- sentation of Fully Many-Body Localized Systems Using Tensor Networks, Phys. Rev. X�, 021018 (2017)

    2017

  32. [32]

    T. B. Wahl, A. Pal, and S. H. Simon, Signatures of the many-body localized regime in two dimensions, Nat. Phys.��, 164 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    Chertkov, B

    E. Chertkov, B. Villalonga, and B. K. Clark, Numerical Evidence for Many-Body Localization in Two and Three Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 180602 (2021)

    2021

  34. [34]

    Y. Yang, S. Iblisdir, J. I. Cirac, and M. C. Ba˜ nuls, Prob- ing Thermalization through Spectral Analysis with Ma- 7 trix Product Operators, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 100602 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. (NY)���, 96 (2011)

    2011

  36. [36]

    See the Supplementary Information for detailed infor- mation about the calculations and results in the main text

  37. [37]

    Vidal, Efficient Classical Simulation of Slightly En- tangled Quantum Computations, Phys

    G. Vidal, Efficient Classical Simulation of Slightly En- tangled Quantum Computations, Phys. Rev. Lett.��, 147902 (2003)

    2003

  38. [38]

    Nandkishore and D

    R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-Body Localiza- tion and Thermalization in Quantum Statistical Me- chanics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.�, 15 (2015)

    2015

  39. [39]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.��, 021001 (2019)

    2019

  40. [40]

    Oganesyan and D

    V. Oganesyan and D. A. Huse, Localization of inter- acting fermions at high temperature, Phys. Rev. B��, 155111 (2007)

    2007

  41. [41]

    ˇSuntajs, J

    J. ˇSuntajs, J. Bonˇ ca, T. Prosen, and L. Vidmar, Quan- tum chaos challenges many-body localization, Phys. Rev. E���, 062144 (2020)

    2020

  42. [42]

    J. S. Cotler, G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, J. Polchinski, P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, A. Streicher, and M. Tezuka, Black holes and random matrices, J. High Energy Phys.����(5), 118

  43. [43]

    A. K. Das, A. Ghosh, and L. F. Santos, Spectral form factor and energy correlations in banded random matri- ces, Phys. Rev. B���, 224202 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Schiulaz, E

    M. Schiulaz, E. J. Torres-Herrera, and L. F. Santos, Thouless and relaxation time scales in many-body quan- tum systems, Phys. Rev. B��, 174313 (2019)

    2019

  45. [45]

    Prakash, J

    A. Prakash, J. H. Pixley, and M. Kulkarni, Universal spectral form factor for many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Res.�, L012019 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    Sierant, D

    P. Sierant, D. Delande, and J. Zakrzewski, Thouless Time Analysis of Anderson and Many-Body Localiza- tion Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 186601 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    D. N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett.��, 1291 (1993)

    1993

  48. [48]

    Our data is more consistent with the constant offset−1/2, which does not affect the dominant volume-law scaling

    For a bipartition with dimensions (2χ, χ), the standard Page entropy isS Page ≈logχ−1/4. Our data is more consistent with the constant offset−1/2, which does not affect the dominant volume-law scaling

  49. [49]

    J. A. Kj¨ all, J. H. Bardarson, and F. Pollmann, Many- Body Localization in a Disordered Quantum Ising Chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 107204 (2014)

    2014

  50. [50]

    D. J. Luitz, N. Laflorencie, and F. Alet, Many-body localization edge in the random-field Heisenberg chain, Phys. Rev. B��, 081103 (2015)

    2015

  51. [51]

    Serbyn, Z

    M. Serbyn, Z. Papi´ c, and D. A. Abanin, Criterion for Many-Body Localization-Delocalization Phase Transi- tion, Phys. Rev. X�, 041047 (2015)

    2015

  52. [52]

    Khemani, S

    V. Khemani, S. P. Lim, D. N. Sheng, and D. A. Huse, Critical Properties of the Many-Body Localiza- tion Transition, Phys. Rev. X�, 021013 (2017)

    2017

  53. [53]

    Morningstar, L

    A. Morningstar, L. Colmenarez, V. Khemani, D. J. Luitz, and D. A. Huse, Avalanches and many-body res- onances in many-body localized systems, Phys. Rev. B ���, 174205 (2022)

    2022

  54. [54]

    Abanin, J

    D. Abanin, J. Bardarson, G. De Tomasi, S. Gopalakr- ishnan, V. Khemani, S. Parameswaran, F. Pollmann, A. Potter, M. Serbyn, and R. Vasseur, Distinguishing localization from chaos: Challenges in finite-size sys- tems, Ann. Phys.���, 168415 (2021)

    2021

  55. [55]

    Sels and A

    D. Sels and A. Polkovnikov, Dynamical obstruction to localization in a disordered spin chain, Phys. Rev. E ���, 054105 (2021)

    2021

  56. [56]

    W. D. Roeck, L. Giacomin, F. Huveneers, and O. Prosniak, Absence of Normal Heat Conduction in Strongly Disordered Interacting Quantum Chains, arXiv:2408.04338 [math-ph] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Weisse, R

    A. Weisse, R. Gerstner, and J. Sirker, Operator growth in disordered spin chains: Indications for the absence of many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Res.�, 033018 (2025)

    2025

  58. [58]

    Serbyn, D

    M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papi´ c, Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nat. Phys.��, 675 (2021)

    2021

  59. [59]

    Moudgalya, B

    S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quan- tum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: a review of exact results, Rep. Prog. Phys.��, 086501 (2022)

    2022

  60. [60]

    Chandran, T

    A. Chandran, T. Iadecola, V. Khemani, and R. Moess- ner, Quantum Many-Body Scars: A Quasiparticle Per- spective, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.��, 443 (2023)

    2023

  61. [61]

    Shiraishi and T

    N. Shiraishi and T. Mori, Systematic Construction of Counterexamples to the Eigenstate Thermalization Hy- pothesis, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 030601 (2017)

    2017

  62. [62]

    Moudgalya, N

    S. Moudgalya, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, En- tanglement of exact excited states of Affleck-Kennedy- Lieb-Tasaki models: Exact results, many-body scars, and violation of the strong eigenstate thermalization hy- pothesis, Phys. Rev. B��, 235156 (2018)

    2018

  63. [63]

    Schecter and T

    M. Schecter and T. Iadecola, Weak Ergodicity Breaking and Quantum Many-Body Scars in Spin-1 XY Magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 147201 (2019)

    2019

  64. [64]

    D. K. Mark, C.-J. Lin, and O. I. Motrunich, Unified structure for exact towers of scar states in the Affleck- Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki and other models, Phys. Rev. B ���, 195131 (2020)

    2020

  65. [65]

    O’Dea, F

    N. O’Dea, F. Burnell, A. Chandran, and V. Khemani, From tunnels to towers: Quantum scars from Lie alge- bras andq-deformed Lie algebras, Phys. Rev. Res.�, 043305 (2020)

    2020

  66. [66]

    Moudgalya and O

    S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, Exhaustive Char- acterization of Quantum Many-Body Scars Using Com- mutant Algebras, Phys. Rev. X��, 041069 (2024)

    2024

  67. [67]

    Buˇ ca, Unified Theory of Local Quantum Many-Body Dynamics: Eigenoperator Thermalization Theorems, Phys

    B. Buˇ ca, Unified Theory of Local Quantum Many-Body Dynamics: Eigenoperator Thermalization Theorems, Phys. Rev. X��, 031013 (2023)

    2023

  68. [68]

    Pakrouski, P

    K. Pakrouski, P. N. Pallegar, F. K. Popov, and I. R. Kle- banov, Many-Body Scars as a Group Invariant Sector of Hilbert Space, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 230602 (2020)

    2020

  69. [69]

    J. Ren, C. Liang, and C. Fang, Quasisymmetry Groups and Many-Body Scar Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 120604 (2021)

    2021

  70. [70]

    W. W. Ho, S. Choi, H. Pichler, and M. D. Lukin, Peri- odic Orbits, Entanglement, and Quantum Many-Body Scars in Constrained Models: Matrix Product State Ap- proach, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 040603 (2019)

    2019

  71. [71]

    A. A. Michailidis, C. J. Turner, Z. Papi´ c, D. A. Abanin, and M. Serbyn, Slow Quantum Thermalization and Many-Body Revivals from Mixed Phase Space, Phys. Rev. X��, 011055 (2020). 8

    2020

  72. [72]

    C. J. Turner, J.-Y. Desaules, K. Bull, and Z. Papi´ c, Cor- respondence Principle for Many-Body Scars in Ultracold Rydberg Atoms, Phys. Rev. X��, 021021 (2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    Evrard, A

    B. Evrard, A. Pizzi, S. I. Mistakidis, and C. B. Dag, Quantum Scars and Regular Eigenstates in a Chaotic Spinor Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 020401 (2024)

    2024

  74. [74]

    Pizzi, L.-H

    A. Pizzi, L.-H. Kwan, B. Evrard, C. B. Dag, and J. Knolle, Genuine quantum scars in many-body spin systems, Nat. Commun.��, 6722 (2025)

    2025

  75. [75]

    Fendley, K

    P. Fendley, K. Sengupta, and S. Sachdev, Competing density-wave orders in a one-dimensional hard-boson model, Phys. Rev. B��, 075106 (2004)

    2004

  76. [76]

    F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi, and M. Dalmonte, Lattice Gauge The- ories and String Dynamics in Rydberg Atom Quantum Simulators, Phys. Rev. X��, 021041 (2020)

    2020

  77. [77]

    Lin and O

    C.-J. Lin and O. I. Motrunich, Exact Quantum Many- Body Scar States in the Rydberg-Blockaded Atom Chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.���, 173401 (2019)

    2019

  78. [78]

    A. N. Ivanov and O. I. Motrunich, Many exact area-law scar eigenstates in the nonintegrable PXP and related models, arXiv:2503.16327 [quant-ph] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Ljubotina, J.-Y

    M. Ljubotina, J.-Y. Desaules, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´ c, Superdiffusive Energy Transport in Kinetically Con- strained Models, Phys. Rev. X��, 011033 (2023)

    2023

  80. [80]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Ser- byn, and Z. Papi´ c, Quantum scarred eigenstates in a Rydberg atom chain: Entanglement, breakdown of ther- malization, and stability to perturbations, Phys. Rev. B ��, 155134 (2018)

    2018

Showing first 80 references.