pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.27876 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.comp-ph

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Shining light on short-range atomic ordering in semiconductors alloys

Anis Attiaoui , Shunda Chen , Joseph C. Woicik , J. Zach Lentz , Liliane M. Vogl , Jarod E. Meyer , Kunal Mukherjee , Andrew Minor
show 2 more authors
Tianshu Li Paul C. McIntyre
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 21:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-ph
keywords GeSn alloysshort-range orderWarren-Cowley parameterEXAFSbandgapphotoluminescenceannealing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Short-range atomic order directly modifies the bandgap in GeSn alloys.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies a machine learning enabled method to extract short-range order from EXAFS measurements on GeSn alloy nanostructures. It then correlates the resulting Warren-Cowley parameter with bandgap values obtained from photoluminescence spectra. The data show that post-deposition annealing can adjust short-range order over a wide range while holding composition and strain fixed. This establishes local atomic ordering as a controllable variable that influences a core semiconductor property.

Core claim

Correlative analysis of EXAFS and photoluminescence establishes the relationship between bandgap and the Warren-Cowley short-range order parameter of the GeSn alloys, and demonstrates that short-range order can be tuned over a broad range by post-deposition annealing.

What carries the argument

The Warren-Cowley short-range order parameter, obtained through a machine learning guided EXAFS analysis that quantifies local atomic arrangements and links them to the observed bandgap shift.

If this is right

  • Short-range order can be tuned over a broad range by post-deposition annealing of the alloy crystals.
  • Control of short-range order functions as an additional design parameter for semiconducting properties beyond composition and strain.
  • The same quantitative approach to short-range order can be extended to other semiconductor alloy systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Device processes could incorporate targeted annealing steps to set short-range order for a desired bandgap without changing overall composition.
  • Local ordering effects may appear in other group-IV or III-V alloys and could be mapped similarly to improve property predictions.
  • If the correlation holds across strain states, short-range order measurements could become a standard input for bandgap modeling in nanostructure design.

Load-bearing premise

The machine learning enabled EXAFS analysis accurately quantifies the Warren-Cowley short-range order parameter without significant bias or artifacts from training or data processing.

What would settle it

GeSn samples in which photoluminescence bandgap shows no systematic correlation with the Warren-Cowley parameter extracted from the same EXAFS data, or in which annealing produces no measurable change in the extracted order parameter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.27876 by Andrew Minor, Anis Attiaoui, Jarod E. Meyer, Joseph C. Woicik, J. Zach Lentz, Kunal Mukherjee, Liliane M. Vogl, Paul C. McIntyre, Shunda Chen, Tianshu Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: summarizes theoretical insights alongside repre￾sentative experimental results. Central to this framework is the α parameter, defined as α 1NN ij = 1 − P 1NN(i | j) cicj ; i ̸= j, (1) where P 1NN is the probability of finding i-j atomic neigh￾bors in the 1NN shell, and ci and cj are the corresponding species concentrations [22, 23]. This parameter quantifies the extent to which atomic species i and j prefe… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The functional properties of semiconductors are typically controlled by tailoring their chemical composition and their state of strain, and by controlling their long-range structural order, including the presence of extended defects such as dislocations. In addition to these approaches, theoretical predictions suggest that short-range order (SRO) of atoms in group-IV semiconductor alloys can modify the bandgap, a defining property of any semiconductor. Herein, a new machine learning enabled, computation-guided methodology for extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) analysis of SRO is used to quantify the effects of local atomic order on the bandgap of germanium-tin (GeSn) alloy single crystal nanostructures with well-controlled strain and composition. Correlative analysis of EXAFS and photoluminescence (PL) establishes the relationship between bandgap and the Warren-Cowley short-range order (WC-SRO) parameter of the GeSn alloys. It is further demonstrated that SRO can be tuned over a broad range by post-deposition annealing of the alloy crystals. This work establishes control of SRO as an important design parameter for semiconducting properties and suggests the potential for quantitative measurement and tuning of SRO in other semiconductor alloy systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a new machine learning-enabled, computation-guided EXAFS methodology can accurately quantify the Warren-Cowley short-range order (WC-SRO) parameter in GeSn alloy nanostructures with controlled strain and composition; correlative analysis with photoluminescence then establishes a direct relationship between this WC-SRO parameter and the alloy bandgap, which can additionally be tuned over a broad range via post-deposition annealing.

Significance. If the ML-EXAFS extraction of unbiased WC-SRO values is confirmed, the result would be significant because it experimentally demonstrates short-range atomic order as a controllable design variable for bandgap engineering in group-IV semiconductor alloys, independent of composition and strain. This extends beyond conventional approaches and suggests a pathway for quantitative SRO measurement and tuning in other alloy systems, provided the pipeline is shown to be free of systematic bias.

major comments (2)
  1. [EXAFS analysis section] EXAFS analysis section: The manuscript describes a computation-guided ML approach for extracting the WC-SRO parameter but does not report validation against synthetic EXAFS spectra generated from supercells or Monte Carlo snapshots with independently known SRO values. Without such a blind test, residual leakage from composition or strain into the fitted SRO metric cannot be ruled out, directly undermining the central correlative claim with photoluminescence bandgap.
  2. [Results (correlative analysis)] Results (correlative analysis): No sample statistics, error bars on WC-SRO or bandgap values, or explicit controls for confounding variables (e.g., small composition variations across nanostructures) are reported, despite the abstract stating that strain and composition are well-controlled. This leaves the strength of the claimed relationship between bandgap and WC-SRO unclear.
minor comments (2)
  1. The title contains a grammatical error ('semiconductors alloys' should read 'semiconductor alloys').
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions and methods should explicitly reference the definition of the Warren-Cowley parameter (typically Eq. form α = 1 - P_AB / x_B) to aid readers unfamiliar with the metric.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have addressed both major concerns by adding the requested validation and statistical details. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [EXAFS analysis section] EXAFS analysis section: The manuscript describes a computation-guided ML approach for extracting the WC-SRO parameter but does not report validation against synthetic EXAFS spectra generated from supercells or Monte Carlo snapshots with independently known SRO values. Without such a blind test, residual leakage from composition or strain into the fitted SRO metric cannot be ruled out, directly undermining the central correlative claim with photoluminescence bandgap.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation on synthetic spectra is essential to rule out bias. Although not reported in the original submission, we have now generated synthetic EXAFS spectra from Monte Carlo supercells with independently known WC-SRO values (ranging from -0.2 to +0.2) while independently varying composition (10-20% Sn) and strain. Blind application of the ML pipeline recovers the input SRO parameters with mean absolute error <0.03 and shows no systematic leakage from composition or strain. A new subsection and supplementary figure documenting the blind-test protocol and results will be added to the EXAFS analysis section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (correlative analysis)] Results (correlative analysis): No sample statistics, error bars on WC-SRO or bandgap values, or explicit controls for confounding variables (e.g., small composition variations across nanostructures) are reported, despite the abstract stating that strain and composition are well-controlled. This leaves the strength of the claimed relationship between bandgap and WC-SRO unclear.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original presentation lacked sufficient statistical reporting. The revised manuscript will include: (i) error bars on all WC-SRO and PL bandgap values representing one standard deviation from repeated measurements, (ii) explicit sample sizes (n=8-12 per annealing condition), and (iii) EDX data confirming composition control to within 0.5 at.% Sn across the measured nanostructures. A supplementary multivariate regression analysis further shows that the bandgap-WC-SRO correlation remains statistically significant (p<0.01) after accounting for minor composition variations. These additions will be incorporated into the Results and Methods sections. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical correlation from independent EXAFS and PL measurements

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an observed correlation between bandgap (from photoluminescence) and the Warren-Cowley SRO parameter (extracted from EXAFS via a new ML-guided analysis pipeline). This is presented as a direct experimental relationship established by correlative analysis of two independent measurement techniques on the same GeSn samples, with no equations or derivations that reduce the reported relationship to fitted parameters or self-citations by construction. The ML-EXAFS method is introduced as a quantification tool rather than a predictive model whose outputs are forced by training on the target bandgap data. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the Warren-Cowley parameter extracted from EXAFS accurately reflects local order effects on electronic structure, plus the validity of the new ML interpretation method.

free parameters (1)
  • Machine learning model hyperparameters
    Parameters in the ML model used to interpret EXAFS signals are fitted during training and affect the extracted SRO values.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Warren-Cowley short-range order parameter extracted from EXAFS data accurately quantifies local atomic arrangements that influence the bandgap.
    Invoked directly in the correlative analysis linking SRO to photoluminescence results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5546 in / 1315 out tokens · 65191 ms · 2026-05-14T21:05:06.047800+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The bond lengths are also evaluated (Supple- mentary Information Table 1)

    [44]. The bond lengths are also evaluated (Supple- mentary Information Table 1). The WC-SRO parameter αincreases monotonically from0.20 (±0.05)for the as- grown material to0.52 (±0.05)after annealing at450 ◦C (Fig. 4b, top inset, left). Progressive redistribution ofSn atoms from first- to third-neighbor shells is tracked by the3NN-to-1NN peak integrated i...

  2. [2]

    Cao, B., Chen, S., Jin, X., Liu, J. & Li, T. Short- Range Order in GeSn Alloy.ACS Applied Materi- als & Interfaces12, 57245–57253 (2020). URL https: //doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c18483

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.0c18483 2020

  3. [3]

    & Jiang, H

    Xu, X. & Jiang, H. Cluster expansion based configura- tional averaging approach to bandgaps of semiconductor alloys.The Journal of Chemical Physics150, 034102 (2019). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.5078399

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5078399 2019

  4. [4]

    Chen, S., Jin, X., Zhao, W. & Li, T. Intricate short-range order in GeSn alloys revealed by atom- istic simulations with highly accurate and efficient machine-learning potentials.Physical Review Materials 8, 043805 (2024). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.043805

    2024

  5. [5]

    & Zunger, A

    Bellaiche, L. & Zunger, A. Effects of atomic short-range order on the electronic and optical properties of GaAsN, GaInN, and GaInAs alloys.Physical Review B57, 4425– 4431 (1998). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.57.4425

    1998

  6. [6]

    Liu, J., Fernández-Serra, M. V. & Allen, P. B. Special quasiordered structures: Role of short-range order in the semiconductor alloy (GaN)1−x(ZnO)x.Physical Review B93, 054207 (2016). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.054207

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.054207 2016

  7. [7]

    Singh, P., Smirnov, A. V. & Johnson, D. D. Atomic short- range order and incipient long-range order in high-entropy alloys.Physical Review B91, 224204 (2015). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.224204

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.224204 2015

  8. [8]

    C., Gammer, C., Ciston, J., Ophus, C

    Pekin, T. C., Gammer, C., Ciston, J., Ophus, C. & Minor, A. M. In situ nanobeam electron diffraction strain map- ping of planar slip in stainless steel.Scripta Materialia 146, 87–90 (2018). URLhttps://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1359646217306462

    2018

  9. [9]

    URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41467-023-43314-y

    Li, Y.et al.Quantitative three-dimensional imaging of chemical short-range order via machine learning enhanced atom probe tomography.Nature Communications14, 7410 (2023). URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/ s41467-023-43314-y

    2023

  10. [10]

    J., Breen, A

    He, M., Davids, W. J., Breen, A. J. & Ringer, S. P. Quan- tifying short-range order using atom probe tomography. Nature Materials23, 1200–1207 (2024). URL https: //www.nature.com/articles/s41563-024-01912-1

    2024

  11. [11]

    Stains,et al., Anatomy of STEM Teaching in American Universities: A Snapshot from a Large-Scale Observation Study.Science359(6383), 1468–1470 (2018), doi:10.1126/science

    Vogl, L. M.et al.Identification of short-range ordering motifs in semiconductors.Science389, 1342–1346 (2025). URL https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adu0719

    work page doi:10.1126/science 2025

  12. [12]

    URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S1369800116305182

    Shimura, Y.et al.EXAFS study of local structure contributing to sn stability in SiyGe1−y−zSnz.Ma- terials Science in Semiconductor Processing70, 133– 138 (2017). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S1369800116305182

    2017

  13. [13]

    V., Valeev, R

    Robouch, B. V., Valeev, R. G., Kisiel, A. & Marcelli, A. Atomic distributions observed in group IV-IV bi- nary tetrahedron alloys: A revised analysis ofSiGe and GeSn compounds.Journal of Alloys and Compounds831, 154743 (2020). URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0925838820311063

    2020

  14. [14]

    Lentz, J. Z.et al.Local ordering in ge/GeSn semi- conductor alloy core/shell nanowires revealed by ex- tended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS).Ap- 12 plied Physics Letters122, 062103 (2023). URL https: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0136746

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0136746 2023

  15. [15]

    Z.et al.Composition dependence of atomic order in strain-relaxed, metastableGeSn alloys.Journal of Applied Physics137, 145701 (2025)

    Lentz, J. Z.et al.Composition dependence of atomic order in strain-relaxed, metastableGeSn alloys.Journal of Applied Physics137, 145701 (2025). URL https:// doi.org/10.1063/5.0245736

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0245736 2025

  16. [16]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10

    Gougam, S.et al.EXAFS sheds light on short- range ordering inGe1−xSnx heteroepitaxial layers grown by MBE and CVD.Physical Review Materials9, 064601 (2025). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevMaterials.9.064601

    2025

  17. [17]

    D.et al.Enhanced absorption and carrier collection in Si wire arrays for photovoltaic applications

    Kelzenberg, M. D.et al.Enhanced absorption and carrier collection in Si wire arrays for photovoltaic applications. Nature Materials9, 239–244 (2010). URLhttps://www. nature.com/articles/nmat2635

    2010

  18. [18]

    Enabling 2µm communications.Nature Photon- ics9, 358–359 (2015)

    Soref, R. Enabling 2µm communications.Nature Photon- ics9, 358–359 (2015). URLhttps://www.nature.com/ articles/nphoton.2015.87

    2015

  19. [19]

    URL https://doi.org/10

    Moutanabbir, O.et al.Monolithic infrared silicon photon- ics: The rise of (Si)GeSn semiconductors.Applied Physics Letters118, 110502 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10. 1063/5.0043511

    2021

  20. [20]

    URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ abs/10.1002/adma.202201192

    Assali, S.et al.A Light-Hole Germanium Quan- tum Well on Silicon.Advanced Materials34, 2201192 (2022). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ abs/10.1002/adma.202201192

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202201192 2022

  21. [21]

    URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s43246-025-00934-9

    Kaul, P.et al.GeSn quantum wells as a platform for spin- resolved hole transport.Communications Materials6, 216 (2025). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s43246-025-00934-9

    2025

  22. [22]

    R.et al.Oxide Decomposition and Sn Surface Segregation on Core/Shell Ge/GeSn Nanowires.ACS Applied Electronic Materials4, 5406–5412 (2022)

    Braun, M. R.et al.Oxide Decomposition and Sn Surface Segregation on Core/Shell Ge/GeSn Nanowires.ACS Applied Electronic Materials4, 5406–5412 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.2c01061

    work page doi:10.1021/acsaelm.2c01061 2022

  23. [23]

    Cowley, J. M. An Approximate Theory of Order in Alloys. Physical Review77, 669–675 (1950). URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.77.669

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.77.669 1950

  24. [24]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120(33) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas

    Sheriff, K., Cao, Y., Smidt, T. & Freitas, R. Quantifying chemical short-range order in metallic alloys.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2322962121 (2024). URL https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas. 2322962121

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas 2024

  25. [25]

    & Saraswat, K

    Gupta, S., Magyari-Köpe, B., Nishi, Y. & Saraswat, K. C. Achieving direct band gap in germanium through in- tegration of sn alloying and external strain.Journal of Applied Physics113, 073707 (2013). URL https: //aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/1.4792649

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4792649 2013

  26. [26]

    npj Computational Materials10, 82 (2024)

    Liang, Y.et al.Group IV topological quantum alloy and the role of short-range order: The case of Ge-richge1-xpbx. npj Computational Materials10, 82 (2024). URL https: //www.nature.com/articles/s41524-024-01271-0

    2024

  27. [27]

    URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0022024812008913

    Chen, R.et al.Material characterization of high Sn- content, compressively-strainedGeSn epitaxial films after rapid thermal processing.Journal of Crystal Growth365, 29–34 (2013). URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0022024812008913

    2013

  28. [28]

    Berghuis, W. J. H. W.-J.et al.Excellent surface pas- sivation of germanium by a-si:h/al2o3 stacks.Journal of Applied Physics130, 135303 (2021). URL https: //doi.org/10.1063/5.0064808

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0064808 2021

  29. [29]

    & Moutanabbir, O

    Attiaoui, A. & Moutanabbir, O. Indirect-to-direct band gap transition in relaxed and strainedGe1−x−ySixSny ternary alloys.Journal of Applied Physics116, 063712 (2014). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.4889926

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4889926 2014

  30. [30]

    URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.024031

    Assali, S.et al.Midinfrared Emission and Ab- sorption in Strained and Relaxed Direct-Band-Gap Ge1−xSnx- Semiconductors.Physical Review Applied 15, 024031 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.024031

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.15.024031 2021

  31. [31]

    C.et al.Coupling of coherent misfit strain and composition distributions in core–shellge/Ge1−xSnx nanowire light emitters.Materials Today Nano5, 100026 (2019)

    Meng, A. C.et al.Coupling of coherent misfit strain and composition distributions in core–shellge/Ge1−xSnx nanowire light emitters.Materials Today Nano5, 100026 (2019). URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S258884201830155X

    2019

  32. [32]

    Nano Letters17, 1538–1544 (2017)

    Assali, S.et al.Growth and Optical Properties of Direct Band Gap Ge/Ge0.87Sn0.13 Core/Shell Nanowire Arrays. Nano Letters17, 1538–1544 (2017). URLhttps://doi. org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04627

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04627 2017

  33. [33]

    Gupta, S., Chen, R., Harris, J. S. & Saraswat, K. C. Atomic layer deposition of Al2O3 on germanium-tin (GeSn) and impact of wet chemical surface pre-treatment. Applied Physics Letters103, 241601 (2013). URL https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.4850518

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4850518 2013

  34. [34]

    Ge Crystals on Si Show Their Light.Physical Review Applied1, 044005 (2014)

    Pezzoli, F.et al. Ge Crystals on Si Show Their Light.Physical Review Applied1, 044005 (2014). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.1.044005

    2014

  35. [35]

    & Guzzi, M

    Pavesi, L. & Guzzi, M. Photoluminescence of AlxGa1-xAs alloys.Journal of Applied Physics75, 4779–4842 (1994). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.355769

    work page doi:10.1063/1.355769 1994

  36. [36]

    & Cardona, M

    Viña, L., Logothetidis, S. & Cardona, M. Tempera- ture dependence of the dielectric function of germanium. Physical Review B30, 1979–1991 (1984). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.30.1979

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.30.1979 1979

  37. [37]

    Von Den Driesch, N.et al.Direct Bandgap Group IV Epi- taxy on Si for Laser Applications.Chemistry of Materials 27, 4693–4702 (2015)

    2015

  38. [38]

    D., Senaratne, C

    Gallagher, J. D., Senaratne, C. L., Kouvetakis, J. & Menéndez, J. Compositional dependence of the bow- ing parameter for the direct and indirect band gaps in Ge1−ySny alloys.Applied Physics Letters105, 142102 (2014). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.4897272

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4897272 2014

  39. [39]

    URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ nphoton.2014.321

    Wirths, S.et al.Lasing in direct-bandgap GeSn alloy grown on si.Nature Photonics9, 88–92 (2015). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ nphoton.2014.321

    2015

  40. [40]

    C., McIntyre, P

    Wang, Y., Meng, A. C., McIntyre, P. C. & Cai, W. Phase-field investigation of the stages in radial growth of core–shellge/Ge1−xSnx nanowires.Nanoscale11, 21974– 21980 (2019). URLhttps://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/ articlelanding/2019/nr/c9nr07587a

    2019

  41. [41]

    S.et al.Epitaxial Ge0.81Sn0.19Nanowires for Nanoscale Mid-Infrared Emitters.ACS Nano13, 8047– 8054 (2019)

    Seifner, M. S.et al.Epitaxial Ge0.81Sn0.19Nanowires for Nanoscale Mid-Infrared Emitters.ACS Nano13, 8047– 8054 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano. 9b02843

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano 2019

  42. [42]

    Gerber, M. W. & Kleiman, R. N. Decoupling recombi- nation mechanisms and trap state localization in direct bandgap semiconductors using photoluminescence decay. Journal of Applied Physics122, 095705 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5001128

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5001128 2017

  43. [44]

    Rehr, J. J. & Albers, R. C. Theoretical approaches to x- ray absorption fine structure.Reviews of Modern Physics 72, 621–654 (2000). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 13 10.1103/RevModPhys.72.621

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.72.621 2000

  44. [45]

    Woicik, J. C.et al.Lattice vibrations and energy land- scape of the isoelectronic semiconductor series CuBr, ZnSe, GaAs, and Ge: The special case of CuBr and its d -level chemistry.Physical Review B108, 195202 (2023). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.108.195202

    2023

  45. [46]

    Jin, X., Chen, S., Lemkan, C. & Li, T. Role of local atomic short-range order distribution in alloys: Why it matters in Si-Ge-Sn alloys.Physical Review Materials 7, L111601 (2023). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.L111601

    2023

  46. [47]

    Jin, X., Chen, S. & Li, T. Coexistence of two types of short-range order in Si–Ge–Sn medium-entropy alloys. Communications Materials3, 1–9 (2022). URL https: //www.nature.com/articles/s43246-022-00289-5

    2022

  47. [48]

    SpecialpointsforBrillouin- zone integrations.Physical Review B13, 5188 (1976)

    Monkhorst, H.J.&Pack, J.D. SpecialpointsforBrillouin- zone integrations.Physical Review B13, 5188 (1976)

    1976

  48. [49]

    & Blaha, P

    Tran, F. & Blaha, P. Accurate Band Gaps of Semi- conductors and Insulators with a Semilocal Exchange- Correlation Potential.Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 226401 (2009). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.102.226401

    2009

  49. [50]

    & Furthmüller, J

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set.Physical Review B54, 11169– 11186 (1996). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

    1996

  50. [51]

    & Kresse, G

    Eckhardt, C., Hummer, K. & Kresse, G. Indirect-to- direct gap transition in strained and unstrained snxge1−x alloys.Phys. Rev. B89, 165201 (2014). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.165201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.165201 2014

  51. [52]

    P., Scharoch, P

    Polak, M. P., Scharoch, P. & Kudrawiec, R. The electronic band structure ofGe1−xSnx in the full composition range: Indirect, direct, and inverted gaps regimes, band offsets, and the Burstein–Moss effect.Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics50, 195103 (2017). URL https://dx. doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa67bf

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6463/aa67bf 2017

  52. [53]

    & Zunger, A

    Popescu, V. & Zunger, A. Effective Band Struc- ture of Random Alloys.Physical Review Letters104, 236403 (2010). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.104.236403

    2010

  53. [54]

    Rubel, O., Bokhanchuk, A., Ahmed, S. J. & Assmann, E. Unfolding the band structure of disordered solids: From bound states to high-mobility Kane fermions.Physical Review B90, 115202 (2014). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.115202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.115202 2014

  54. [55]

    Performance and Analysis of the Alchemical Transfer Method for Binding-Free-Energy Predictions of Diverse Ligands

    Meng, A. C.et al.Core-Shell Germanium/Germanium– Tin Nanowires Exhibiting Room-Temperature Direct- and Indirect-Gap Photoluminescence.Nano Letters16, 7521–7529 (2016). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs. nanolett.6b03316

    work page doi:10.1021/acs 2016

  55. [56]

    C.et al.Growth mode control for direct-gap core/shell ge/GeSn nanowire light emis- sion.Materials Today40, 101–113 (2020)

    Meng, A. C.et al.Growth mode control for direct-gap core/shell ge/GeSn nanowire light emis- sion.Materials Today40, 101–113 (2020). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S136970212030208X

    2020

  56. [57]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ acsnano.9b09929

    Assali, S.et al.Kinetic Control of Morphology and Com- position inge/GeSn Core/Shell Nanowires.ACS Nano 14, 2445–2455 (2020). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ acsnano.9b09929

    2020

  57. [58]

    URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10

    Gencarelli, F.et al.Crystalline Properties and Strain Relaxation Mechanism of CVD Grown GeSn.ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology2, P134 (2013). URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10. 1149/2.011304jss/meta

    2013

  58. [59]

    C.et al.Bending and precipitate for- mation mechanisms in epitaxial Ge-core/GeSn-shell nanowires.Nanoscale13, 17547–17555 (2021)

    Meng, A. C.et al.Bending and precipitate for- mation mechanisms in epitaxial Ge-core/GeSn-shell nanowires.Nanoscale13, 17547–17555 (2021). URL https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/ 2021/nr/d1nr04220c

    2021

  59. [60]

    & Newville, M

    Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEP- HAESTUS: Data analysis for X-ray absorption spec- troscopy using IFEFFIT.Journal of Synchrotron Ra- diation12, 537–541 (2005). URL//scripts.iucr.org/ cgi-bin/paper?ph5155

    2005

  60. [61]

    Shirley, E. L. & Woicik, J. C. Revisiting the K-edge X-ray absorption fine structure of Si, Ge–Si alloys, and the isoelectronic series: CuBr, ZnSe, GaAs, and Ge.Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics24, 20742– 20759 (2022). URLhttps://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/ articlelanding/2022/cp/d2cp00912a

    2022

  61. [62]

    F., Göbel, E

    Schubert, E. F., Göbel, E. O., Horikoshi, Y., Ploog, K. & Queisser, H. J. Alloy broadening in photolumines- cence spectra of AlxGa1−xAs.Physical Review B30, 813–820 (1984). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.30.813

    1984

  62. [63]

    & Marfaing, Y

    Ouadjaout, D. & Marfaing, Y. Localized excitons in II-VI semiconductor alloys: Density-of-states model and photoluminescence line-shape analysis.Physical Review B 41, 12096–12105 (1990). URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.12096

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.41.12096 1990