Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 2 cited by

A return map built from radial projection and inward normals acts as adaptive gradient descent on thickness and converges globally to its critical points.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-15 11:44 UTC pith:U6ZI5NWR

load-bearing objection Wrong manuscript was supplied for 2603.28453; only the abstract of the return-map/thickness paper is available, so the global-convergence claims cannot be checked. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.28453 v3 pith:U6ZI5NWR submitted 2026-03-30 math.DS

Global Convergence of the Return Dynamics in the Class mathcal{O}_C

Mohammed Barkatou , Mohamed El Morsalani This is my paper
classification math.DS MSC 37C1037C2553A0552A20
keywords return mapthickness functionconvex coreadaptive gradient descentglobal convergenceradial structureboundary geometrycurvature conditions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies domains that contain a fixed convex core and are linked to an outer boundary by a radial thickness function. It defines a return map that sends a point on the core out along a ray to the outer surface and then back along the inward normal. The central claim is that this map is, to first order, an adaptive gradient descent for the thickness: the dynamics drive points toward locations where thickness is locally minimal. Fixed points of the map coincide with critical points of thickness, a convergence rate is given, the thickness function is shown to inherit regularity from the boundary geometry, and under curvature hypotheses the two surfaces are structurally equivalent. The result therefore ties a simple geometric iteration to the smoothness and shape of the domain.

Core claim

Inside the class of domains that contain a fixed convex core and admit a radial thickness function, the return map obtained by radial projection to the outer boundary followed by the inward-normal return behaves, to first order, as adaptive gradient descent on thickness; its fixed points are precisely the critical points of thickness and the iteration converges globally to those points at a quantified rate.

What carries the argument

The return map: radial projection from the core to the outer boundary, then return along the inward unit normal; its first-order expansion is shown to equal a negative multiple of the gradient of the thickness function.

Load-bearing premise

The domains must belong to a class that keeps a fixed convex core, admits a well-defined single-valued radial structure and thickness function, and is regular enough for the first-order expansion and normal return to be well-defined.

What would settle it

Exhibit a domain with a fixed convex core and continuous thickness function for which the return map either fails to be single-valued, fails to decrease thickness to first order, or possesses a trajectory that does not converge to a critical point of thickness.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that, for domains in a class O_C containing a fixed convex core, a return map defined by radial projection from the core to the outer boundary followed by return along inward normals is, to first order, an adaptive gradient descent for a thickness function linking the two boundaries. Fixed points of the map are asserted to coincide with critical points of thickness; global convergence with a quantified rate is claimed; regularity of thickness relative to boundary geometry and a structural equivalence of the surfaces under curvature conditions are also asserted. The supplied full-text body is an unrelated set of lecture notes on positivity properties of scattering amplitudes (arXiv:2603.28454), so none of the definitions, expansions, or proofs for the claimed dynamical system can be inspected.

Significance. If the claimed first-order identification of the return map with adaptive gradient descent of thickness, the fixed-point characterization, and the global-convergence rate were rigorously established for a well-defined class O_C, the result would be a nontrivial contribution linking geometric dynamics on annular-type domains to minimization of a thickness functional, with potential interest in convex geometry and geometric analysis. No machine-checked proofs, code, or explicit rate formulae are available for evaluation because the body text does not match the abstract.

major comments (2)
  1. The full manuscript text provided under the paper identifier is an entirely different work (lecture notes on completely monotone and Stieltjes functions in QFT, arXiv:2603.28454). Consequently the definitions of the class O_C, the radial structure, the thickness function, the return map, the first-order expansion, the fixed-point characterization, the convergence-rate estimate, and the curvature-equivalence statements cannot be checked at all. The abstract alone does not supply the regularity hypotheses needed to guarantee that the inward-normal return is single-valued or that a first-order expansion is valid, so the central global-convergence claim is unsupported by any verifiable argument.
  2. Even restricting attention to the abstract, the class O_C is left undefined, as are the precise regularity assumptions on the outer boundary that would make the thickness function C^2 (or better) and the normal return single-valued. Without these, the asserted coincidence of fixed points with critical points of thickness and the quantified global convergence cannot be assessed for correctness.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract uses informal phrasing ('the system naturally evolves toward areas where the thickness is minimized') that would need to be replaced by precise statements once a correct manuscript body is supplied.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity can be established: supplied full text is a different paper (positivity lecture notes), and the abstract alone shows a geometric definition followed by claimed analysis without self-definitional reduction.

full rationale

The target claim concerns a return map on domains in class O_C that is asserted to act, to first order, as adaptive gradient descent on a thickness function, with fixed points equal to critical points of thickness and global convergence with a rate. The CACHEABLE full manuscript is not that paper: it is Raman's lecture notes on completely monotone and Stieltjes functions (arXiv:2603.28454). Consequently none of the definitions of O_C, the radial structure, the thickness function, the first-order expansion of the return map, the fixed-point characterization, the convergence-rate estimates, or the curvature-equivalence statements can be inspected or reduced to inputs. From the abstract alone the return map is introduced by a geometric construction (radial projection from core to outer boundary, then inward-normal return) and is then claimed to relate to the gradient of thickness; that is a definition-plus-analysis pattern, not a self-definitional loop, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation uniqueness theorem. Per the hard rule that circularity may be claimed only when a specific reduction can be quoted from the paper, no circular steps are recorded and the score is 0. The mismatch of full text is a verification failure, not evidence of circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 2 invented entities

Because only the abstract is available for the claimed paper, the ledger records the minimal geometric hypotheses that the abstract itself invokes. No free parameters appear; the invented entities are the return map and the thickness function as used in this construction.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Domains belong to a class O_C containing a fixed convex core and admitting a well-defined radial structure and thickness function.
    Stated in the abstract as the ambient setting; without a precise definition the subsequent claims are uncheckable.
  • domain assumption The outer boundary is sufficiently regular that the inward unit normal is single-valued and the first-order expansion of the return map is valid.
    Implicit in the construction of the return map and the gradient-descent approximation.
  • standard math Standard differential-geometric facts about convex bodies, support functions and normal maps hold.
    Background needed for any first-order analysis of radial projections and thickness.
invented entities (2)
  • return map (radial projection followed by inward-normal return) no independent evidence
    purpose: Defines the discrete dynamical system whose global convergence is claimed.
    Introduced in the abstract as the central object of study; no independent prior definition is supplied.
  • thickness function linking core and outer boundary no independent evidence
    purpose: Serves as the Lyapunov / objective function whose critical points are the fixed points of the return map.
    Defined via the radial structure; its regularity and critical-point structure are part of the claimed results.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 38802 in / 2331 out tokens · 23573 ms · 2026-07-15T11:44:36.440140+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This research investigates a geometric dynamical mechanism within a specific class of domains that contain a fixed convex core. By using a radial structure that links the boundaries of the core and the outer domain via a thickness function, the authors introduce a "return map." This map is constructed by projecting a point from the core to the outer boundary and then returning to the core by following the inward normals. The main results demonstrate that this motion behaves, to a first-order approximation, like an adaptive gradient descent for the domain's thickness. In other words, the system naturally evolves toward areas where the thickness is minimized. The study establishes that the fixed points of this dynamics coincide with the critical points of the thickness function. Additionally, the authors quantify the convergence rate, prove the regularity of the thickness function in relation to the boundary geometry, and establish a structural equivalence between the two surfaces under specific curvature conditions. Ultimately, this work links the dynamical properties of the system to the geometric smoothness of the studied shapes.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Geometric Gradient Flows from Elliptic Level Sets: Normal Decomposition and Reflection Dynamics

    math.AP 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0

    Derives a normal decomposition and discrete reflection approximation for elliptic superlevel sets, but the central displacement expansion and numerical validation are internally inconsistent.

  2. Inverse Problems for the Return Map in the Class ( $\mathcal{O}_C$ ): Reconstruction and Identifiability

    math.DS 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The return map determines the gradient structure of the thickness function including critical points and basins, with second-order geometry via a curvature operator, but non-uniqueness from scaling and equivalences ca...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The EFT-Hedron,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-t. Huang, “The EFT-Hedron,”JHEP05(2021) 259, arXiv:2012.15849 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    Positive moments for scattering amplitudes,

    B. Bellazzini, J. Elias Mir´ o, R. Rattazzi, M. Riembau, and F. Riva, “Positive moments for scattering amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 3, (2021) 036006,arXiv:2011.00037 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    The Conformal Bootstrap,

    D. Simmons-Duffin, “The Conformal Bootstrap,” inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp. 1–74. 2017. arXiv:1602.07982 [hep-th]. 65

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    The Amplituhedron,

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka, “The Amplituhedron,”JHEP10(2014) 030, arXiv:1312.2007 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    Positive Geometries and Canonical Forms,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai, and T. Lam, “Positive Geometries and Canonical Forms,”JHEP 11(2017) 039,arXiv:1703.04541 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 7: Positive geometry of scattering amplitudes,

    E. Herrmann and J. Trnka, “The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 7: Positive geometry of scattering amplitudes,”J. Phys. A55no. 44, (2022) 443008, arXiv:2203.13018 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes,

    A. Hodges, “Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes,”JHEP05(2013) 135,arXiv:0905.1473 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Positive Amplitudes In The Amplituhedron,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, A. Hodges, and J. Trnka, “Positive Amplitudes In The Amplituhedron,” JHEP08(2015) 030,arXiv:1412.8478 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Positivity properties of scattering amplitudes,

    J. Henn and P. Raman, “Positivity properties of scattering amplitudes,”JHEP04(2025) 150,arXiv:2407.05755 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Existence et unicit´ e des repr´ esentations int´ egrales dans les convexes compacts quelconques,

    Choquet, Gustave and Meyer, Paul-Andr´ e, “Existence et unicit´ e des repr´ esentations int´ egrales dans les convexes compacts quelconques,”Annales de l’Institut Fourier13no. 1, (1963) 139–154.https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.5802/aif.135/

    work page doi:10.5802/aif.135/ 1963

  11. [11]

    Approximating Feynman Integrals Using Complete Monotonicity and Stieltjes Properties,

    S. Ditsch, J. M. Henn, and P. Raman, “Approximating Feynman Integrals Using Complete Monotonicity and Stieltjes Properties,”arXiv:2512.18499 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  12. [12]

    D. V. Widder,Laplace Transform. Princeton University Press, 2015

    2015

  13. [13]

    Completely monotone functions - a digest,

    M. Merkle, “Completely monotone functions - a digest,” 2012. https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.0900

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    S. N. Bernstein,Le¸ cons sur les propri´ et´ es extr´ emales et la meilleure approximation des fonctions analytiques d’une variable r´ eelle. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1926. https://books.google.com/books?id=doy4AAAAIAAJ

    1926

  15. [15]

    Signs of derivatives and analytic behavior,

    R. P. Boas, “Signs of derivatives and analytic behavior,”The American Mathematical Monthly78no. 10, (1971) 1085–1093.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2316310

    arXiv 1971

  16. [16]

    Widder,The Laplace Transform

    D. Widder,The Laplace Transform. Princeton mathematical series. Princeton University Press, 1941.https://books.google.com/books?id=OywPAAAAIAAJ

    1941

  17. [17]

    Kolmogorov–landau inequalities for monotone functions,

    A. M. Fink, “Kolmogorov–landau inequalities for monotone functions,”J. Math. Anal. Appl. 90(1982) 251–258.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(82)90128-1. 66

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-247x(82)90128-1 1982

  18. [18]

    A probabilistic interpretation of complete monotonicity,

    C. H. Kimberling, “A probabilistic interpretation of complete monotonicity,”Aequationes Math.10(1974) 152–164.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01905828

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01905828 1974

  19. [19]

    The Hornich-Hlawka functional inequality for functions with positive differences

    C. P. Niculescu and S. Sra, “The hornich–hlawka functional inequality for functions with positive differences,”arXiv e-prints(2023) ,arXiv:2301.08342 [math.FA]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.08342

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.08342 2023

  20. [20]

    On m¨ untz’ theorem and completely monotone functions,

    W. Feller, “On m¨ untz’ theorem and completely monotone functions,”The American Mathematical Monthly75no. 4, (1968) 342–350.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2313410

    arXiv 1968

  21. [21]

    Newton series representation of completely monotone functions,

    T. Lamby, J.-L. Marichal, and N. Zenaidi, “Newton series representation of completely monotone functions,”J. Math. Anal. Appl.453(2017) 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.03.050

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.03.050 2017

  22. [22]

    Complete monotonicity for inverse powers of some combinatorially defined polynomials,

    A. D. Scott and A. D. Sokal, “Complete monotonicity for inverse powers of some combinatorially defined polynomials,”Acta Mathematica213no. 2, (2014) 323–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11511-014-0121-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11511-014-0121-6 2014

  23. [23]

    Positivity certificates via integral representations,

    K. Kozhasov, M. Michalek, and B. Sturmfels, “Positivity certificates via integral representations,”arXiv:1908.04191 [math.AG].https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.04191

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908

  24. [24]

    The All-Loop Integrand For Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N=4 SYM,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, S. Caron-Huot, and J. Trnka, “The All-Loop Integrand For Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N=4 SYM,”JHEP01(2011) 041, arXiv:1008.2958 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  25. [25]

    Theory of capacities,

    G. Choquet, “Theory of capacities,”Annales de l’institut Fourier5(1954) 131–295. http://eudml.org/doc/73714

    1954

  26. [26]

    Canonical Forms as Dual Volumes,

    E. Mazzucchelli and P. Raman, “Canonical Forms as Dual Volumes,”arXiv:2509.02239 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag,Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers I: Asymptotic Methods and Perturbation Theory. Springer, New York, 1999. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4757-3069-2

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3069-2 1999

  28. [28]

    Generalized stieltjes functions and their exact order,

    D. Karp and E. Prilepkina, “Generalized stieltjes functions and their exact order,”Journal of Classical Analysis1no. 1, (2012) 53–77. https://files.ele-math.com/articles/jca-01-07.pdf

    2012

  29. [29]

    Berg,Stieltjes-Pick-Bernstein-Schoenberg and their connection to complete monotonicity, pp

    C. Berg,Stieltjes-Pick-Bernstein-Schoenberg and their connection to complete monotonicity, pp. 15–45. 2008. 67

    2008

  30. [30]

    Rational approximant bounds for a class of two-variable Stieltjes functions,

    M. F. Barnsley and P. D. Robinson, “Rational approximant bounds for a class of two-variable Stieltjes functions,”SIAM J. Math. Anal.9no. 2, (1978) 272–290

    1978

  31. [31]

    Iterative structure of finite loop integrals,

    S. Caron-Huot and J. M. Henn, “Iterative structure of finite loop integrals,”JHEP06(2014) 114,arXiv:1404.2922 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  32. [32]

    Renormalization of the Wilson Loops Beyond the Leading Order,

    G. P. Korchemsky and A. V. Radyushkin, “Renormalization of the Wilson Loops Beyond the Leading Order,”Nucl. Phys. B283(1987) 342–364

    1987

  33. [33]

    Gauge Fields as Rings of Glue,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge Fields as Rings of Glue,”Nucl. Phys. B164(1980) 171–188

    1980

  34. [34]

    Asymptotics of the altarelli-parisi-lipatov evolution kernels of parton distributions,

    G. Korchemsky, “Asymptotics of the altarelli-parisi-lipatov evolution kernels of parton distributions,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A4(1989) 1257

    1989

  35. [35]

    An exact prediction of n=4 susym theory for string theory,

    N. Drukker and D. Gross, “An exact prediction of n=4 susym theory for string theory,”J. Math. Phys.42(2001) 2896

    2001

  36. [36]

    The four-loop cusp anomalous dimension inN= 4 super Yang-Mills and analytic integration techniques for Wilson line integrals,

    J. M. Henn and T. Huber, “The four-loop cusp anomalous dimension inN= 4 super Yang-Mills and analytic integration techniques for Wilson line integrals,”JHEP09(2013) 147,arXiv:1304.6418 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    Three Loop Cusp Anomalous Dimension in QCD,

    A. Grozin, J. M. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and P. Marquard, “Three Loop Cusp Anomalous Dimension in QCD,”Phys. Rev. Lett.114no. 6, (2015) 062006,arXiv:1409.0023 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Full Angle Dependence of the Four-Loop Cusp Anomalous Dimension in QED,

    R. Br¨ user, C. Dlapa, J. M. Henn, and K. Yan, “Full Angle Dependence of the Four-Loop Cusp Anomalous Dimension in QED,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 2, (2021) 021601, arXiv:2007.04851 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals

    S. Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals. 1, 2022.arXiv:2201.03593 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Copositive geometry of Feynman integrals,

    B. Sturmfels and M. L. Telek, “Copositive geometry of Feynman integrals,”Lett. Math. Phys.115no. 3, (2025) 74,arXiv:2504.01628 [math.OC]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Scattering into the fifth dimension of N=4 super Yang-Mills,

    L. F. Alday, J. M. Henn, J. Plefka, and T. Schuster, “Scattering into the fifth dimension of N=4 super Yang-Mills,”JHEP01(2010) 077,arXiv:0908.0684 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  42. [42]

    From Partons to Strings: Scattering on the Coulomb Branch ofN= 4 SYM,

    L. F. Alday, E. Armanini, K. H¨ aring, and A. Zhiboedov, “From Partons to Strings: Scattering on the Coulomb Branch ofN= 4 SYM,”arXiv:2510.19909 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  43. [43]

    Scattering Forms and the Positive Geometry of Kinematics, Color and the Worldsheet,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai, S. He, and G. Yan, “Scattering Forms and the Positive Geometry of Kinematics, Color and the Worldsheet,”JHEP05(2018) 096,arXiv:1711.09102 [hep-th]. 68

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Multi-loop positivity of the planar N= 4 SYM six-point amplitude,

    L. J. Dixon, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod, and J. Trnka, “Multi-loop positivity of the planar N= 4 SYM six-point amplitude,”JHEP02(2017) 112,arXiv:1611.08325 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    A Note on Polytopes for Scattering Amplitudes,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. Hodges, and J. Trnka, “A Note on Polytopes for Scattering Amplitudes,”JHEP04(2012) 081,arXiv:1012.6030 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [46]

    Towards the Amplituhedron Volume,

    L. Ferro, T. Lukowski, A. Orta, and M. Parisi, “Towards the Amplituhedron Volume,”JHEP 03(2016) 014,arXiv:1512.04954 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  47. [47]

    Positive geometry, local triangulations, and the dual of the Amplituhedron,

    E. Herrmann, C. Langer, J. Trnka, and M. Zheng, “Positive geometry, local triangulations, and the dual of the Amplituhedron,”JHEP01(2021) 035,arXiv:2009.05607 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Iteration of planar amplitudes in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at three loops and beyond,

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and V. A. Smirnov, “Iteration of planar amplitudes in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at three loops and beyond,”Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 085001,arXiv:hep-th/0505205

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  49. [49]

    Conformal Ward identities for Wilson loops and a test of the duality with gluon amplitudes,

    J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “Conformal Ward identities for Wilson loops and a test of the duality with gluon amplitudes,”Nucl. Phys. B 826(2010) 337–364,arXiv:0712.1223 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  50. [50]

    Bootstrapping a Five-Loop Amplitude Using Steinmann Relations,

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, A. McLeod, and M. von Hippel, “Bootstrapping a Five-Loop Amplitude Using Steinmann Relations,”Phys. Rev. Lett.117no. 24, (2016) 241601, arXiv:1609.00669 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    Two-loop five-point two-mass planar integrals and double Lagrangian insertions in a Wilson loop,

    S. Abreu, D. Chicherin, V. Sotnikov, and S. Zoia, “Two-loop five-point two-mass planar integrals and double Lagrangian insertions in a Wilson loop,”JHEP10(2024) 167, arXiv:2408.05201 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Positivity properties of five-point two-loop Wilson loops with Lagrangian insertion,

    D. Chicherin, J. Henn, J. Trnka, and S.-Q. Zhang, “Positivity properties of five-point two-loop Wilson loops with Lagrangian insertion,”arXiv:2410.11456 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    The full four-loop cusp anomalous dimension inN= 4 super Yang-Mills and QCD,

    J. M. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and B. Mistlberger, “The full four-loop cusp anomalous dimension inN= 4 super Yang-Mills and QCD,”JHEP04(2020) 018,arXiv:1911.10174 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    From DGLAP to Sudakov: Precision Predictions for Energy-Energy Correlators,

    M. Jaarsma, Y. Li, I. Moult, W. J. Waalewijn, and H. X. Zhu, “From DGLAP to Sudakov: Precision Predictions for Energy-Energy Correlators,”arXiv:2512.11950 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  55. [55]

    Positivity properties in the coupling for observables inN= 4 SYM,

    M. Haensch, “Positivity properties in the coupling for observables inN= 4 SYM,”To appear(2026) ,arXiv:arXiv:2026.XXXX [hep-th]. Preprint or in preparation. 69

    2026