arxiv: 2603.28832 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-30 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · hep-ex· hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Effects of Cosmic Muons on μeV-to-meV Scale Axion Dark Matter Searches

Dan Zhang , Gray Rybka , Edward J. Daw , Robyn Evren

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 01:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det hep-exhep-ph

keywords axion dark mattercosmic muonssynchrotron radiationmuon backgrounddark matter detectionmagnetic field effectsparticle detector noise

0 comments

The pith

Cosmic muons generate synchrotron radiation that current high-Q axion searches can reject but future broadband detectors cannot ignore without fine energy resolution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper calculates the synchrotron radiation produced by cosmic muons passing through the strong magnetic field of axion dark matter detectors operating between micro-electronvolt and milli-electronvolt scales. Using GEANT4 simulations of muon trajectories in an 8-tesla solenoid, the authors derive analytical power spectra across a wide range of muon energies and angles. They conclude that existing experiments avoid this background because their high quality factor and precise energy resolution distinguish the muon signals from the axion resonance. A sympathetic reader cares because axion searches hunt for extremely faint dark-matter signals, and any unaccounted background limits how far sensitivity can be pushed in larger or broader-band detectors.

Core claim

The synchrotron radiation from cosmic muons does not dominate the noise background for current μeV-scale axion dark matter experiments because of the high quality factor Q and fine energy resolution in the readout; without sufficient energy resolution, future broadband axion dark matter experiments will be vulnerable to this radiation from charged particles.

What carries the argument

GEANT4 simulation of muon tracks in a cylindrical volume with uniform 8 T field, combined with an analytical model for the angular-frequency-differential synchrotron radiation power spectra across wide Lorentz factor and pitch-angle ranges.

If this is right

Current μeV-scale axion experiments with high Q and fine energy resolution remain insensitive to muon synchrotron backgrounds.
Broadband axion detectors must incorporate sufficient energy resolution to suppress muon-induced events.
The analytical synchrotron spectra provide a reusable tool for estimating backgrounds in any similar strong-field detector.
Detector designs for future axion searches should prioritize energy resolution over raw bandwidth alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Energy resolution upgrades could allow larger-volume broadband searches without new shielding against cosmic rays.
The same muon radiation mechanism may set practical limits on other precision experiments that use strong magnets and wide-band readouts.
Varying the applied magnetic field strength in a test setup would directly test how the predicted radiation scales with B squared.

Load-bearing premise

The GEANT4 muon-track simulation and the derived analytical synchrotron spectra accurately represent the real cosmic muon flux, pitch angles, and radiation inside the experimental volume under the uniform 8 T field assumption.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the rate and spectrum of synchrotron radiation events from cosmic muons in an 8 T field that deviates significantly from the simulated and analytical predictions would falsify the claim that muons remain negligible for current detectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.28832 by Dan Zhang, Edward J. Daw, Gray Rybka, Robyn Evren.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Vector diagram for a muon in helical motion in a uniform magnetic field. Both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Integrated angular-frequency-differential synchrotron radiation power spectra at different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The angular-frequency-differential synchrotron radiation power spectra at different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Pitch angle α and Lorentz factor distributions γ of cosmic muons at sea level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Distribution of the muon time in the copper cavity with different pitch angles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The averaged differential synchrotron radiation power spectrum (blue solid line) of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: (a) The axion power Pa with different enhancements Q (solid lines) compared to muon synchrotron radiation with different energy resolutions (dashed lines). Here typical parameters close to the ADMX experiments are used in the Pa calculations [48]. (b) The Qs leading to Pa = Paxion at different energy resolutions. radiation with some specific polarizations. The methodology can be adapted to different experi… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We estimate the synchrotron radiation of cosmic muons in a uniform magnetic field in the $\mu$eV-to-meV energy scale. Such events can potentially bring backgrounds to the axion dark matter searches. The GEANT4 software package is utilized to simulate the muon tracks in a cylindrical region of interest with an 8~T solenoid magnetic field applied. We further develop an analytical estimation of the angular-frequency-differential synchrotron radiation power spectra in this work as the cosmic muons span a wide range of Lorentz factor $\gamma$ and pitch angle $\alpha$. We verify that the cosmic muons are not the dominant noise background for the current axion dark matter experiments on the $\mu$eV scale because of the high quality factor $Q$ and fine energy resolution in the readout. However, without sufficient energy resolution in the detector readout, future broadband axion dark matter experiments will be vulnerable to the synchrotron radiation of these charged particles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Muons are probably not the main background for current high-Q μeV axion searches but could matter for broadband designs, with the estimates resting on unvalidated GEANT4 runs and uniform-field assumptions.

read the letter

The key point is that cosmic-muon synchrotron radiation should stay below the noise floor in today's high-Q, narrowband axion haloscopes at the μeV scale because the fine energy resolution and high quality factor suppress it, yet the same background could become relevant for future broadband searches that lack tight resolution. The paper reaches this by running GEANT4 to track muons through an 8 T cylindrical volume and then deriving an analytical angular-frequency-differential power spectrum that covers the broad range of muon Lorentz factors and pitch angles. That combination gives a more complete estimate than simply using average values, and it supplies concrete numbers experimenters can fold into shielding or veto decisions. The central claim follows directly from the suppression factors: the narrow resonance window and resolution cut most of the muon-induced events. The work is therefore useful for groups already running or planning μeV-scale cavities. The softer part is the lack of any check against real data. The conclusions depend on GEANT4 reproducing the actual site flux, angular distribution, and radiated power inside a real solenoid; the paper does not show comparisons to measured backgrounds or tests of how field gradients or site-to-site variations shift the rate. If those inputs are off by even a factor of two, the margin for current experiments shrinks and the warning for broadband cases strengthens. The uniform-field assumption is also an idealization that may miss edge effects. This is the sort of targeted background study that axion experimentalists will want to see when they set resolution requirements. It shows clear engagement with the practical problem and uses standard tools in a straightforward way, so it deserves a serious referee. I would send it for peer review and ask the authors to add at least a brief comparison to existing muon-flux measurements or a sensitivity table on the main inputs.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper estimates synchrotron radiation from cosmic muons in an 8 T uniform magnetic field as a potential background for axion dark matter searches in the μeV-to-meV range. GEANT4 is used to simulate muon tracks in a cylindrical volume of interest, and an analytical calculation is developed for the angular-frequency-differential power spectra across wide ranges of Lorentz factor γ and pitch angle α. The central claim is that muons are not the dominant background for current μeV-scale experiments due to high quality factor Q and fine energy resolution in the readout, but future broadband searches without sufficient resolution will be vulnerable.

Significance. If the simulations and spectra accurately capture real conditions, the work provides a timely assessment of an under-studied background for axion haloscopes, quantifying how high-Q and resolution suppress muon-induced noise while flagging risks for broadband designs. The dual use of GEANT4 tracks and first-principles synchrotron formulas for broad γ/α distributions is a strength, offering concrete guidance on readout requirements for next-generation detectors.

major comments (2)

[GEANT4 Simulation] GEANT4 simulation section: The muon track modeling and derived synchrotron spectra lack any validation or comparison against measured cosmic muon flux, pitch-angle distributions, or radiation yields in comparable 8 T fields. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the conclusion that muons remain below the resolution-suppressed threshold assumes the simulated rates and power are accurate within a factor of ~2; unmodeled systematics (site flux, field gradients) could reverse the 'not dominant' verdict for current experiments.
[Analytical Estimation] Analytical estimation and results: The power spectra rely on the uniform 8 T cylinder assumption and external distributions for γ and α; no sensitivity analysis is shown for deviations (e.g., field non-uniformity or factor-of-2 flux variation), which directly affects whether the broadband vulnerability conclusion holds or whether current high-Q suppression remains robust.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: Typical numerical values for Q and energy resolution used in the comparison are not stated, making it harder to assess the quantitative suppression claimed.
[Results] Figures: Spectra plots would benefit from overlaid uncertainty bands reflecting simulation statistics or parameter variations to improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. The points raised regarding validation and sensitivity analysis are important for strengthening the robustness of our conclusions. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional discussion, references, and analyses addressing these concerns, as detailed in the point-by-point responses below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [GEANT4 Simulation] GEANT4 simulation section: The muon track modeling and derived synchrotron spectra lack any validation or comparison against measured cosmic muon flux, pitch-angle distributions, or radiation yields in comparable 8 T fields. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the conclusion that muons remain below the resolution-suppressed threshold assumes the simulated rates and power are accurate within a factor of ~2; unmodeled systematics (site flux, field gradients) could reverse the 'not dominant' verdict for current experiments.

Authors: We acknowledge the importance of validation. The GEANT4 simulations employ the standard QGSP_BERT physics list, which has been validated for cosmic muon propagation and magnetic field effects in multiple high-energy physics contexts (we have added explicit citations to relevant validation studies in the revised text). Input flux and pitch-angle distributions follow established models from the PDG and dedicated cosmic-ray literature. Direct experimental data on synchrotron yields from cosmic muons in precisely 8 T fields are not available, but we have added a new discussion subsection quantifying expected systematics: site flux variations are typically <30% and field gradients in real solenoids introduce <10% broadening. Even assuming a conservative factor-of-2 increase in rate, the high-Q (>10^5) and fine energy resolution of current experiments keep the background below threshold, as the effective noise contribution scales with the narrow bandwidth. This supports our central claim while noting that dedicated beam tests would be valuable future work. revision: partial
Referee: [Analytical Estimation] Analytical estimation and results: The power spectra rely on the uniform 8 T cylinder assumption and external distributions for γ and α; no sensitivity analysis is shown for deviations (e.g., field non-uniformity or factor-of-2 flux variation), which directly affects whether the broadband vulnerability conclusion holds or whether current high-Q suppression remains robust.

Authors: We agree that sensitivity analysis improves the paper. The revised manuscript now includes explicit calculations for field non-uniformity (±10% variation across the volume, which slightly broadens the frequency spectra but leaves integrated power nearly unchanged) and flux variations by a factor of 2. For high-Q detectors the suppression remains effective because resolution is finer than the induced broadening. For broadband designs the total power scales linearly with flux, preserving the vulnerability conclusion. These results are presented in a new figure and text section, confirming that the main findings are robust under the explored deviations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; estimates from external GEANT4 and first-principles synchrotron formulas

full rationale

The paper's central verification that cosmic muons are not dominant for current μeV-scale axion searches rests on GEANT4-simulated tracks in an 8 T field plus an independently derived analytical synchrotron power spectrum for wide γ/α ranges. These inputs are external (simulation package) or first-principles (standard synchrotron formulas) and do not reduce to parameters fitted from the target background threshold or to self-citations that carry the load-bearing step. The conclusion about high-Q and fine-resolution suppression follows directly from comparing the computed spectra against known experimental parameters, without self-definition or renaming of results. No load-bearing step collapses to its own output by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard particle transport assumptions in GEANT4 and classical synchrotron radiation formulas without introducing new free parameters, axioms beyond domain standards, or invented entities.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Standard GEANT4 modeling of charged particle propagation in uniform magnetic fields accurately reproduces real muon trajectories and energy loss.
Invoked for the cylindrical region-of-interest simulation with 8 T solenoid.
standard math Classical synchrotron radiation formulas apply without quantum corrections across the relevant Lorentz factors and pitch angles for cosmic muons.
Used to derive the angular-frequency-differential power spectra.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5472 in / 1327 out tokens · 55162 ms · 2026-05-14T01:39:12.291353+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

GEANT4 simulation of muon tracks... analytical estimation of angular-frequency-differential synchrotron radiation power spectra... Eq. (2)–(4) with Bessel Jn
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

8 T solenoid... cylindrical region of interest

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

[1]

R. D. Peccei and Helen R. Quinn. CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles.Phys. Rev. Lett., 38:1440–1443, Jun 1977

work page 1977
[2]

A New Light Boson?Phys

Steven Weinberg. A New Light Boson?Phys. Rev. Lett., 40:223–226, 1978

work page 1978
[3]

Problem of Strong p and t Invariance in the Presence of Instantons.Phys

Frank Wilczek. Problem of Strong p and t Invariance in the Presence of Instantons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 40:279–282, 1978

work page 1978
[4]

Wise, and Frank Wilczek

John Preskill, Mark B. Wise, and Frank Wilczek. Cosmology of the invisible axion.Physics Letters B, 120(1):127–132, 1983

work page 1983
[5]

Abbott and P

L.F. Abbott and P. Sikivie. A cosmological bound on the invisible axion.Physics Letters B, 120(1):133–136, 1983

work page 1983
[6]

The not-so-harmless axion.Physics Letters B, 120(1):137–141, 1983

Michael Dine and Willy Fischler. The not-so-harmless axion.Physics Letters B, 120(1):137–141, 1983

work page 1983
[7]

Ipser and P

J. Ipser and P. Sikivie. Can galactic halos be made of axions?Phys. Rev. Lett., 50:925–927, Mar 1983

work page 1983
[8]

Borsanyi, Z

S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. Guenther, et al. Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics.Nature, 539(7627):69–71, Nov 2016. 8 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

work page 2016
[9]

Axions, instantons, and the lattice.Phys

Michael Dine, Patrick Draper, Laurel Stephenson-Haskins, and Di Xu. Axions, instantons, and the lattice.Phys. Rev. D, 96:095001, Nov 2017

work page 2017
[10]

Bardeen and S.-H.H

William A. Bardeen and S.-H.H. Tye. Current algebra applied to properties of the light higgs boson.Physics Letters B, 74(3):229–232, 1978

work page 1978
[11]

T. W. Donnelly, S. J. Freedman, R. S. Lytel, et al. Do axions exist?Phys. Rev. D, 18:1607–1620, Sep 1978

work page 1978
[12]

Dolan, Frederick J

Matthew J. Dolan, Frederick J. Hiskens, and Raymond R. Volkas. Advancing globular cluster constraints on the axion-photon coupling.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2022(10):096, oct 2022

work page 2022
[13]

Revisiting the bound on axion-photon coupling from globular clusters.Phys

Adrian Ayala, Inma Dom´ ınguez, Maurizio Giannotti, et al. Revisiting the bound on axion-photon coupling from globular clusters.Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:191302, Nov 2014

work page 2014
[14]

First constraints on qcd axion dark matter using james webb space telescope observations, 2025

Elena Pinetti. First constraints on qcd axion dark matter using james webb space telescope observations, 2025. arXiv:2503.11753

work page arXiv 2025
[15]

Improved estimation of radiated axions from cosmological axionic strings.Phys

Takashi Hiramatsu, Masahiro Kawasaki, Toyokazu Sekiguchi, et al. Improved estimation of radiated axions from cosmological axionic strings.Phys. Rev. D, 83:123531, Jun 2011

work page 2011
[16]

Axion dark matter from topological defects.Phys

Masahiro Kawasaki, Ken’ichi Saikawa, and Toyokazu Sekiguchi. Axion dark matter from topological defects.Phys. Rev. D, 91:065014, Mar 2015

work page 2015
[17]

Buchoff, and Enrico Rinaldi

Evan Berkowitz, Michael I. Buchoff, and Enrico Rinaldi. Lattice qcd input for axion cosmology.Phys. Rev. D, 92:034507, Aug 2015

work page 2015
[18]

Leesa Fleury and Guy D. Moore. Axion dark matter: strings and their cores.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2016(01):004–004, jan 2016

work page 2016
[19]

Axion phenomenology andθ-dependence from nf= 2 + 1 lattice qcd.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(3):155, Mar 2016

Claudio Bonati, Massimo D’Elia, Marco Mariti, et al. Axion phenomenology andθ-dependence from nf= 2 + 1 lattice qcd.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(3):155, Mar 2016

work page 2016
[20]

The topological susceptibility in finite temperature qcd and axion cosmology.Physics Letters B, 762:498–505, 2016

Peter Petreczky, Hans-Peter Schadler, and Sayantan Sharma. The topological susceptibility in finite temperature qcd and axion cosmology.Physics Letters B, 762:498–505, 2016

work page 2016
[21]

Unifying inflation with the axion, dark matter, baryogenesis, and the seesaw mechanism.Phys

Guillermo Ballesteros, Javier Redondo, Andreas Ringwald, and Carlos Tamarit. Unifying inflation with the axion, dark matter, baryogenesis, and the seesaw mechanism.Phys. Rev. Lett., 118:071802, Feb 2017

work page 2017
[22]

Klaer and Guy D

Vincent B. Klaer and Guy D. Moore. The dark-matter axion mass.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2017(11):049–049, nov 2017

work page 2017
[23]

Foster, and Benjamin R

Malte Buschmann, Joshua W. Foster, and Benjamin R. Safdi. Early-universe simulations of the cosmological axion.Phys. Rev. Lett., 124:161103, Apr 2020

work page 2020
[24]

More Axions from Strings.SciPost Phys., 10:50, 2021

Marco Gorghetto, Edward Hardy, and Giovanni Villadoro. More Axions from Strings.SciPost Phys., 10:50, 2021

work page 2021
[25]

Foster, Anson Hook, et al

Malte Buschmann, Joshua W. Foster, Anson Hook, et al. Dark matter from axion strings with adaptive mesh refinement.Nature Commun., 13(1):1049, 2022

work page 2022
[26]

Graham and Adam Scherlis

Peter W. Graham and Adam Scherlis. Stochastic axion scenario.Phys. Rev. D, 98:035017, Aug 2018

work page 2018
[27]

Fuminobu Takahashi, Wen Yin, and Alan H. Guth. Qcd axion window and low-scale inflation. Phys. Rev. D, 98:015042, Jul 2018

work page 2018
[28]

P. Sikivie. Experimental tests of the ”invisible” axion.Phys. Rev. Lett., 51:1415–1417, Oct 1983

work page 1983
[29]

Jihn E. Kim. Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance.Phys. Rev. Lett., 43:103, 1979

work page 1979
[30]

Shifman, A.I

Mikhail A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, and Valentin I. Zakharov. Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?Nucl.Phys., B166:493, 1980. 9 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

work page 1980
[31]

A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion.Phys

Michael Dine, Willy Fischler, and Mark Srednicki. A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion.Phys. Lett., B104:199, 1981

work page 1981
[32]

Zhitnitsky

A.R. Zhitnitsky. On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian).Sov. J. Nucl. Phys., 31:260, 1980

work page 1980
[33]

N. Du, N. Force, R. Khatiwada, et al. Search for invisible axion dark matter with the axion dark matter experiment.Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:151301, Apr 2018

work page 2018
[34]

Braine, R

T. Braine, R. Cervantes, N. Crisosto, et al. Extended search for the invisible axion with the axion dark matter experiment.Phys. Rev. Lett., 124:101303, Mar 2020

work page 2020
[35]

Bartram, T

C. Bartram, T. Braine, E. Burns, et al. Search for invisible axion dark matter in the 3.3− −4.2µeV mass range.Phys. Rev. Lett., 127:261803, Dec 2021

work page 2021
[36]

Goodman, M

C. Goodman, M. Guzzetti, C. Hanretty, et al. Admx axion dark matter bounds around 3.3µeV with dine-fischler-srednicki-zhitnitsky discovery ability.Phys. Rev. Lett., 134:111002, Mar 2025

work page 2025
[37]

Carosi, C

G. Carosi, C. Cisneros, N. Du, et al. Search for axion dark matter from 1.1 to 1.3 ghz with admx.Phys. Rev. Lett., 135:191001, Nov 2025

work page 2025
[38]

Yi, Saebyeok Ahn, C ¸ a ˘ glar Kutlu, et al

Andrew K. Yi, Saebyeok Ahn, C ¸ a ˘ glar Kutlu, et al. Axion dark matter search around 4.55µeV with dine-fischler-srednicki-zhitnitskii sensitivity.Phys. Rev. Lett., 130:071002, Feb 2023

work page 2023
[39]

Ivanov, et al

Saebyeok Ahn, JinMyeong Kim, Boris I. Ivanov, et al. Extensive search for axion dark matter over 1 ghz with capp’s main axion experiment.Phys. Rev. X, 14:031023, Aug 2024

work page 2024
[40]

Guzzetti, D

M. Guzzetti, D. Zhang, C. Goodman, et al. Improved receiver noise calibration for admx axion search: 4.54 to 5.41µev.Phys. Rev. D, 111:092012, May 2025

work page 2025
[41]

Allison, K

J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, et al. Recent developments in geant4.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 835:186–225, 2016

work page 2016
[42]

Allison, K

J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, et al. Geant4 developments and applications.IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 53(1):270–278, 2006

work page 2006
[43]

Agostinelli, J

S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, et al. Geant4—a simulation toolkit. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 506(3):250–303, 2003

work page 2003
[44]

BEKEFI.Radiation Processes In Plasmas

G. BEKEFI.Radiation Processes In Plasmas. JOHN WILEY AND SONS, 1966

work page 1966
[45]

Awida, et al

Gabe Hoshino, Stefan Knirck, Mohamed H. Awida, et al. First axionlike particle results from a broadband search for wavelike dark matter in the 44 to 52µeV range with a coaxial dish antenna.Phys. Rev. Lett., 134:171002, Apr 2025

work page 2025
[46]

Ary dos Santos Garcia, D

B. Ary dos Santos Garcia, D. Bergermann, A. Caldwell, et al. First search for axion dark matter with a madmax prototype.Phys. Rev. Lett., 135:041001, Jul 2025

work page 2025
[47]

Pagano, G

D. Pagano, G. Bonomi, A. Donzella, A. Zenoni, et al. Ecomug: An efficient cosmic muon generator for cosmic-ray muon applications.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 1014:165732, 2021

work page 2021
[48]

Khatiwada, D

R. Khatiwada, D. Bowring, A. S. Chou, et al. Axion dark matter experiment: Detailed design and operations.Review of Scientific Instruments, 92(12):124502, 12 2021

work page 2021
[49]

J. D. Jackson.Classical Electrodynamics. Wiley, 3rd edition, 1999

work page 1999
[50]

Gates, Geza Gyuk, and Michael S

Evalyn I. Gates, Geza Gyuk, and Michael S. Turner. The local halo density.The Astrophysical Journal, 449(2):L123, aug 1995

work page 1995
[51]

Dark matter local density determination: recent observations and future prospects.Reports on Progress in Physics, 84(10):104901, oct 2021

Pablo F de Salas and A Widmark. Dark matter local density determination: recent observations and future prospects.Reports on Progress in Physics, 84(10):104901, oct 2021. 10 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa Authoret al

work page 2021
[52]

The global network of cavities to search for gravitational waves (gravnet): A novel scheme to hunt gravitational waves signatures from the early universe, 2023

Kristof Schmieden and Matthias Schott. The global network of cavities to search for gravitational waves (gravnet): A novel scheme to hunt gravitational waves signatures from the early universe, 2023. arXiv:2308.11497

work page arXiv 2023
[53]

Ashtari Esfahani, S

A. Ashtari Esfahani, S. Bhagvati, S. B¨ oser, M. J. Brandsema, et al. Antenna arrays for neutrino mass measurements with cyclotron radiation emission spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. C, 112:045506, Oct 2025

work page 2025
[54]

Buzinsky et al

N. Buzinsky et al. Larmor power limit for cyclotron radiation of relativistic particles in a waveguide.New J. Phys., 26(8):083021, 2024. 11

work page 2024