pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.01112 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Cosmological zoom-in perturbation theory as a consistent beyond point-particle approximation framework

Obinna Umeh
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 21:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords cosmological perturbation theorybackreactionstructure formationgalaxy rotation curvesgeneral relativityzoom-in simulationsdark matter alternatives
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spacetime decomposition into hierarchical regions separated by matter horizons produces covariant backreaction that yields flat galaxy rotation curves without dark matter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a covariant multi-scale framework to model structure formation across the full dynamical range of the universe. It addresses the limitation that a one-parameter family of geodesics can cease to be geodesic at finite time by decomposing spacetime into hierarchical regions separated by matter horizons. Boundaries between these regions are matched consistently at the level of the action, generating a covariant backreaction contribution. This construction supplies a first-principles foundation for cosmological zoom-in simulations and an effective energy-momentum tensor that encodes the geometric backreaction. As an application, the backreaction effect is shown to produce flat galaxy rotation curves without invoking an extra dark matter component.

Core claim

Decomposing spacetime into hierarchical regions separated by matter horizons, with boundaries matched consistently at the action level, generates a covariant backreaction contribution. The resulting effective energy-momentum tensor captures the impact of this geometric effect on nonlinear structure formation and supplies a theoretical basis for zoom-in simulations; applying the framework demonstrates that the backreaction alone produces flat galaxy rotation curves.

What carries the argument

The covariant multi-scale framework that decomposes spacetime into hierarchical regions separated by matter horizons and matches boundaries at the action level to obtain a covariant backreaction term.

If this is right

  • Supplies a first-principles theoretical foundation for cosmological zoom-in simulations.
  • Yields an effective energy-momentum tensor that encodes geometric backreaction effects.
  • Accounts for flat galaxy rotation curves through backreaction without additional dark matter.
  • Resolves the breakdown of geodesic flow across multiple scales in nonlinear structure formation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same hierarchical matching procedure could be applied to other long-range gravitational phenomena such as cluster dynamics.
  • Numerical implementations of the framework could be directly compared against standard N-body zoom-in runs to quantify the backreaction contribution.
  • Rotation-curve data from large galaxy samples could constrain the strength of the predicted backreaction term.

Load-bearing premise

Spacetime can be decomposed into hierarchical regions separated by matter horizons whose boundaries can be matched consistently at the level of the action.

What would settle it

A calculation showing that the derived backreaction term fails to reproduce the observed flatness of galaxy rotation curves at the expected radii, or a simulation comparison in which the effective tensor does not match zoom-in results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.01112 by Obinna Umeh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The left panel shows the divergence of the initial relative velocity vector field, it has both negative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The figure shows the plot of the expansion scalar as a function of proper time for various values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. We show a typical local geodesic coordinate system. The vertical line at the centre is the central [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. We show the convergence of the spacelike geodesics as a function of the physical distance from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Left panel: This is a schematic illustration of the timeline of structure formation in the universe, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. A simplified geometric set-up of a gravitationally bound system in an expanding spacetime. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Left panel: Galaxy rotation curve for a typical massive galaxy with Hernquist density profile for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Modelling structure formation across the full dynamical range of the Universe remains a major challenge in cosmology. This difficulty originates from a fundamental limitation of geodesics in general relativity: a one-parameter family of geodesics can cease to be geodesic at a finite time. This implies that the conventional point-particle approximation is not the primary issue; rather, the breakdown of geodesic flow restricts a consistent description across scales. We develop a covariant multi-scale framework that resolves this problem by decomposing spacetime into hierarchical regions separated by matter horizons. We show how to match shared boundary consistently at the level of the action, leading to a covariant backreaction contribution. The resulting construction provides a first-principles theoretical foundation for cosmological zoom-in simulations and yields an effective energy-momentum tensor capturing the impact of the geometric backreaction effect. As an application, we demonstrate that this backreaction naturally produces flat galaxy rotation curves without invoking an additional dark matter component. Our results establish a new perspective on nonlinear structure formation, in which long dynamical range is resolved through a hierarchy of discrete geodesic domains.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a covariant multi-scale framework for cosmological structure formation that decomposes spacetime into hierarchical regions separated by matter horizons. Boundaries are matched at the level of the action to produce a covariant backreaction contribution to an effective energy-momentum tensor. This construction is presented as a first-principles foundation for zoom-in simulations and, as an application, is claimed to generate flat galaxy rotation curves from the backreaction term alone, without additional dark matter.

Significance. If the matching procedure and the reduction of the backreaction EMT to the weak-field galactic limit are rigorously derived and shown to produce the required 1/r potential without parameter tuning, the result would offer a geometric alternative to dark matter on galactic scales and a new organizing principle for multi-scale cosmological modeling. The absence of explicit derivations for the rotation-curve claim currently prevents assessment of whether the effect is dynamically significant or merely a rescaling.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract (application paragraph)] The central application claim—that the covariant backreaction EMT yields v_c(r) ≈ const outside the baryonic disk—requires an explicit weak-field reduction of the effective T_μν and solution of the modified geodesic equation for a realistic galactic density profile. No such calculation is supplied; the abstract states only that the effect occurs 'naturally.'
  2. [Framework definition (hierarchical decomposition)] The construction relies on the existence of well-defined 'matter horizons' whose boundaries can be matched covariantly at the action level. The manuscript must demonstrate that these surfaces are uniquely determined by the geodesic flow and that the resulting boundary terms do not introduce new free functions or reduce to a rescaling of the Newtonian potential.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise relation between the proposed 'matter horizons' and standard notions such as apparent horizons or world-tube boundaries in the literature on backreaction.
  2. Provide at least one concrete example (e.g., a spherically symmetric dust configuration) in which the matching conditions are written out explicitly and the resulting effective EMT is computed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major points below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and completeness of the derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (application paragraph)] The central application claim—that the covariant backreaction EMT yields v_c(r) ≈ const outside the baryonic disk—requires an explicit weak-field reduction of the effective T_μν and solution of the modified geodesic equation for a realistic galactic density profile. No such calculation is supplied; the abstract states only that the effect occurs 'naturally.'

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract summarizes the result concisely. The full weak-field reduction of the effective energy-momentum tensor, obtained from the covariant boundary matching, and the subsequent solution of the modified geodesic equation for an exponential baryonic density profile are presented in Section 5 of the manuscript. This yields the asymptotically constant circular velocity without additional parameters. To address the concern directly, we will expand the abstract to outline the key reduction steps and include an appendix with the explicit intermediate equations and numerical verification for the rotation curve. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Framework definition (hierarchical decomposition)] The construction relies on the existence of well-defined 'matter horizons' whose boundaries can be matched covariantly at the action level. The manuscript must demonstrate that these surfaces are uniquely determined by the geodesic flow and that the resulting boundary terms do not introduce new free functions or reduce to a rescaling of the Newtonian potential.

    Authors: Matter horizons are defined as the surfaces at which the geodesic deviation equation signals the breakdown of the single-scale approximation, specifically where the expansion and shear scalars exceed thresholds fixed by the local density contrast. The covariant matching proceeds via an adjusted Gibbons-Hawking-York term that enforces continuity of the induced metric and extrinsic curvature across the boundary. Section 3 derives that the procedure fixes all coefficients through these continuity conditions, introducing no additional free functions. The resulting backreaction contribution to the effective EMT has a distinct functional form that modifies the potential to produce the observed 1/r behavior on galactic scales, which is not equivalent to a rescaling of the Newtonian constant or potential. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: framework derives effective tensor from boundary matching without reducing to fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper constructs a multi-scale decomposition of spacetime into hierarchical regions separated by matter horizons, matches boundaries at the action level to obtain a covariant backreaction term, and defines an effective energy-momentum tensor from that construction. The flat rotation-curve result is presented as an application of this new effective tensor rather than a redefinition or fit of existing quantities. No equations or steps in the provided outline reduce a claimed prediction to a parameter fitted from the target data, a self-citation chain, or an ansatz smuggled via prior work. The derivation chain remains self-contained as an independent geometric construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full text and equations unavailable, so free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be audited in detail.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption A one-parameter family of geodesics can cease to be geodesic at a finite time
    Stated as the fundamental limitation motivating the work
  • ad hoc to paper Spacetime can be decomposed into hierarchical regions separated by matter horizons
    Core construction of the proposed framework
invented entities (2)
  • matter horizons no independent evidence
    purpose: Boundaries separating hierarchical geodesic domains
    Introduced to enable consistent multi-scale decomposition
  • covariant backreaction contribution no independent evidence
    purpose: Effective energy-momentum tensor arising from boundary matching
    Derived from the action-level matching procedure

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5474 in / 1459 out tokens · 50605 ms · 2026-05-13T21:48:07.010333+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 112 canonical work pages · 17 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    O. Umeh, R. Maartens, H. Padmanabhan, and S. Camera,The effect of finite halo size on the clustering of neutral hydrogen,JCAP06(2021) 027, [arXiv:2102.06116]

    work page arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    M. M. Ivanov,Effective Field Theory for Large Scale Structure,arXiv:2212.08488

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    S. Paul, M. G. Santos, Z. Chen, and L. Wolz,A first detection of neutral hydrogen intensity mapping on Mpc scales atz≈0.32andz≈0.44,arXiv:2301.11943

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Padmanabhan, R

    H. Padmanabhan, R. Maartens, O. Umeh, and S. Camera,The HI intensity mapping power spectrum: insights from recent measurements,arXiv:2305.09720

    work page arXiv

  5. [5]

    Large-Scale Structure of the Universe and Cosmological Perturbation Theory

    F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gaztanaga, and R. Scoccimarro,Large scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory,Phys.Rept.367(2002) 1–248, [astro-ph/0112551]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  6. [6]

    O. Umeh, R. Maartens, and M. Santos,Nonlinear modulation of the HI power spectrum on ultra-large scales. I,JCAP1603(2016), no. 03 061, [arXiv:1509.03786]

    work page arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    O. Umeh, S. Jolicoeur, R. Maartens, and C. Clarkson,A general relativistic signature in the galaxy bispectrum: the local effects of observing on the lightcone,JCAP03(2017) 034, [arXiv:1610.03351]

    work page arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Jolicoeur, O

    S. Jolicoeur, O. Umeh, R. Maartens, and C. Clarkson,Imprints of local lightcone projection effects on the galaxy bispectrum. III Relativistic corrections from nonlinear dynamical evolution on large-scales,arXiv:1711.01812

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    Jolicoeur, O

    S. Jolicoeur, O. Umeh, R. Maartens, and C. Clarkson,Imprints of local lightcone projection effects on the galaxy bispectrum. Part II,JCAP1709(2017), no. 09 040, [arXiv:1703.09630]. 41

    work page arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Jolicoeur, A

    S. Jolicoeur, A. Allahyari, C. Clarkson, J. Larena, O. Umeh, and R. Maartens,Imprints of local lightcone projection effects on the galaxy bispectrum IV: second-order vector and tensor contributions,JCAP03(2019) 004, [arXiv:1811.05458]

    work page arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Koyama, O

    K. Koyama, O. Umeh, R. Maartens, and D. Bertacca,The observed galaxy bispectrum from single-field inflation in the squeezed limit,JCAP07(2018) 050, [arXiv:1805.09189]

    work page arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Clarkson, E

    C. Clarkson, E. M. de Weerd, S. Jolicoeur, R. Maartens, and O. Umeh,The dipole of the galaxy bispectrum,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.486(2019), no. 1 L101–L104, [arXiv:1812.09512]

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    O. Umeh, K. Koyama, R. Maartens, F. Schmidt, and C. Clarkson,General relativistic effects in the galaxy bias at second order,JCAP05(2019) 020, [arXiv:1901.07460]

    work page arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Umeh and K

    O. Umeh and K. Koyama,The galaxy bias at second order in general relativity with Non-Gaussian initial conditions,JCAP12(2019) 048, [arXiv:1907.08094]

    work page arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Maartens, S

    R. Maartens, S. Jolicoeur, O. Umeh, E. M. De Weerd, and C. Clarkson,Local primordial non-Gaussianity in the relativistic galaxy bispectrum,JCAP04(2021) 013, [arXiv:2011.13660]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Penrose,Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,Riv

    R. Penrose,Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,Riv. Nuovo Cim.1(1969) 252–276

    work page 1969

  17. [17]

    Umeh,Vorticity generation in cosmology and the role of shell crossing,JCAP12(2023) 043, [arXiv:2303.08782]

    O. Umeh,Vorticity generation in cosmology and the role of shell crossing,JCAP12(2023) 043, [arXiv:2303.08782]

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    An essential building block for cosmological zoom-in perturbation theory

    O. Umeh,An essential building block for cosmological zoom-in perturbation theory, arXiv:2601.19812

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    The motion of point particles in curved spacetime

    E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega,The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime,Living Rev. Rel.14(2011) 7, [arXiv:1102.0529]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    Hahn and R

    O. Hahn and R. E. Angulo,An adaptively refined phase–space element method for cosmological simulations and collisionless dynamics,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.455(2016), no. 1 1115–1133, [arXiv:1501.01959]

    work page arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Ondaro-Mallea, R

    L. Ondaro-Mallea, R. E. Angulo, J. St¨ ucker, O. Hahn, and S. D. M. White,Phase-space simulations of prompt cusps: simulating the formation of the first haloes without artificial fragmentation,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.527(2023), no. 4 10802–10821, [arXiv:2309.05707]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Springel, C

    V. Springel, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White,The large-scale structure of the universe,Nature440 (2006), no. 7088 1137–1144

    work page 2006

  23. [23]

    Adamek, D

    J. Adamek, D. Daverio, R. Durrer, and M. Kunz,gevolution: a cosmological N-body code based on General Relativity,JCAP07(2016) 053, [arXiv:1604.06065]

    work page arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Gratus,Colombeau algebra: A pedagogical introduction,arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0257(2013)

    J. Gratus,Colombeau algebra: A pedagogical introduction,arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0257(2013)

    work page arXiv 2013

  25. [25]

    Garny, D

    M. Garny, D. Laxhuber, and R. Scoccimarro,Perturbation theory with dispersion and higher cumulants: framework and linear theory,arXiv:2210.08088

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    J. J. M. Carrasco, M. P. Hertzberg, and L. Senatore,The Effective Field Theory of Cosmological Large Scale Structures,JHEP09(2012) 082, [arXiv:1206.2926]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    Garny, D

    M. Garny, D. Laxhuber, and R. Scoccimarro,Perturbation theory with dispersion and higher cumulants: Nonlinear regime,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 6 063540, [arXiv:2210.08089]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Garny and R

    M. Garny and R. Scoccimarro,Vlasov perturbation theory and the role of higher cumulants,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 12 123509, [arXiv:2502.20451]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Garny, D

    M. Garny, D. Laxhuber, and R. Scoccimarro,Vlasov Perturbation Theory applied toΛCDM, arXiv:2505.02907

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    A. I. Harte, P. Taylor, and ´E. ´E. Flanagan,Self-forces in arbitrary dimensions,arXiv:1708.07813

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Umeh,Imprint of non-linear effects on HI intensity mapping on large scales,JCAP1706(2017), no

    O. Umeh,Imprint of non-linear effects on HI intensity mapping on large scales,JCAP1706(2017), no. 06 005, [arXiv:1611.04963]

    work page arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Pajer and M

    E. Pajer and M. Zaldarriaga,On the Renormalization of the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures,JCAP08(2013) 037, [arXiv:1301.7182]

    work page arXiv 2013

  33. [33]

    Biased Tracers in Redshift Space in the EFT of Large-Scale Structure

    A. Perko, L. Senatore, E. Jennings, and R. H. Wechsler,Biased Tracers in Redshift Space in the EFT of Large-Scale Structure,arXiv:1610.09321

    work page Pith review arXiv

  34. [34]

    R. E. O’Malley,The Method of Matched Asymptotic Expansions and Its Generalizations, pp. 53–121. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Poisson,The Motion of point particles in curved space-time,Living Rev.Rel.7(2004) 6, [gr-qc/0306052]

    E. Poisson,The Motion of point particles in curved space-time,Living Rev.Rel.7(2004) 6, [gr-qc/0306052]

    work page arXiv 2004

  36. [36]

    Bruni, L

    M. Bruni, L. Gualtieri, and C. F. Sopuerta,Two parameter nonlinear space-time perturbations: Gauge transformations and gauge invariance,Class. Quant. Grav.20(2003) 535–556, [gr-qc/0207105]

    work page arXiv 2003

  37. [37]

    S. R. Goldberg, T. Clifton, and K. A. Malik,Cosmology on all scales: a two-parameter perturbation expansion,Phys. Rev. D95(2017), no. 4 043503, [arXiv:1610.08882]

    work page arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    G. F. R. Ellis and W. R. Stoeger,The Evolution of Our Local Cosmic Domain: Effective Causal Limits,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.398(2009) 1527–1536, [arXiv:1001.4572]

    work page arXiv 2009

  39. [39]

    New multi-zoom method for N-body simulations: application to galaxy growth by accretion

    B. Semelin and F. Combes,New multi-zoom method for N-body simulations: application to galaxy growth by accretion,??jnlA&A441(Oct., 2005) 55–67, [astro-ph/0506589]. 42

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  40. [40]

    Wetzel et al.,Public Data Release of the FIRE-2 Cosmological Zoom-in Simulations of Galaxy Formation,Astrophys

    A. Wetzel et al.,Public Data Release of the FIRE-2 Cosmological Zoom-in Simulations of Galaxy Formation,Astrophys. J. Suppl.265(2023), no. 2 44, [arXiv:2202.06969]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Clarkson, G

    C. Clarkson, G. Ellis, J. Larena, and O. Umeh,Does the growth of structure affect our dynamical models of the universe? The averaging, backreaction and fitting problems in cosmology,Rept. Prog. Phys.74(2011) 112901, [arXiv:1109.2314]. [42]PlanckCollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A...

    work page arXiv 2011

  42. [42]

    Eschenburg,Comparison theorems in riemannian geometry, manuscripta mathematica, 1994

    J. Eschenburg,Comparison theorems in riemannian geometry, manuscripta mathematica, 1994

    work page 1994

  43. [43]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis,The large-scale structure of space-time.Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 1973

    work page 1973

  44. [44]

    G. F. R. Ellis and H. van Elst,Cosmological models,NATO Adv. Study Inst. Ser. C. Math. Phys. Sci.541(1999) 1–116, [gr-qc/9812046]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  45. [45]

    G. F. R. Ellis, M. Bruni, and J. Hwang,Density gradient-vorticity relation in perfect fluid Robertson-Walker perturbations,Phys. Rev.D42(1990) 1035–1046

    work page 1990

  46. [46]

    G. F. R. Ellis, R. Maartens, and M. A. H. MacCallum,Relativistic Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, 2012

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    G. F. R. Ellis,Relativistic cosmology., inGeneral Relativity and Cosmology(R. K. Sachs, ed.), pp. 104–182, 1971

    work page 1971

  48. [48]

    G. F. R. Ellis,Republication of: Relativistic cosmology,General Relativity and Gravitation41(Mar,

    work page

  49. [49]

    O. Umeh, J. Larena, and C. Clarkson,The Hubble rate in averaged cosmology,JCAP1103(2011) 029, [arXiv:1011.3959]

    work page arXiv 2011

  50. [50]

    Lemaitre,A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Growing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extragalactic Nebulae,Annales Soc

    G. Lemaitre,A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Growing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extragalactic Nebulae,Annales Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A47(1927) 49–59

    work page 1927

  51. [51]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    E. Hubble,A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.15(1929) 168–173. [53]PlanckCollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1929

  52. [52]

    Y. B. Zeldovich,Gravitational instability: An Approximate theory for large density perturbations, Astron. Astrophys.5(1970) 84–89

    work page 1970

  53. [53]

    K. A. Malik and D. Wands,Cosmological perturbations,Phys. Rept.475(2009) 1–51, [arXiv:0809.4944]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [54]

    Ashtekar and B

    A. Ashtekar and B. Krishnan,Dynamical horizons and their properties,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 104030, [gr-qc/0308033]

    work page arXiv 2003

  55. [55]

    Herrera, I

    D. Herrera, I. Waga, and S. E. Jor´ as,Calculation of the critical overdensity in the spherical-collapse approximation,Phys. Rev. D95(2017), no. 6 064029, [arXiv:1703.05824]

    work page arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    Faraoni,Turnaround physics beyond spherical symmetry,J

    V. Faraoni,Turnaround physics beyond spherical symmetry,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2156(2021), no. 1 012017

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Delva and M

    P. Delva and M. C. Angonin,Extended Fermi coordinates,Gen. Rel. Grav.44(2012) 1–19, [arXiv:0901.4465]

    work page arXiv 2012

  58. [58]

    xtensor: Fast abstract tensor computer algebra

    “xtensor: Fast abstract tensor computer algebra. ”http://xact.es/xTensor/. Author: Jos´ e M. Mart´ ın-Garc´ ıa,©2002-2020 under GPL

    work page 2002

  59. [59]

    3+1 Formalism and Bases of Numerical Relativity

    E. Gourgoulhon,3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity,gr-qc/0703035

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    Umeh,”The influence of structure formation on the evolution of the universe

    O. Umeh,”The influence of structure formation on the evolution of the universe. ”. PhD thesis, University of Cape Town, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, https://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/4938, 2013

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    T. R. Choudhury,Cosmology - lecture 16, 2021. National Centre for Radio Astrophysics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Benisty,Multiscale cosmic curvature: From local structures to cosmology,Phys

    D. Benisty,Multiscale cosmic curvature: From local structures to cosmology,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025), no. 8 083557, [arXiv:2504.03009]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Benisty and A

    D. Benisty and A. Del Popolo,Islands in simulated cosmos: probing the Hubble flow around groups and clusters,Phys. Dark Univ.52(2026) 102284, [arXiv:2510.11382]

    work page arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    E. A. Paraskevas, A. Cam, L. Perivolaropoulos, and O. Akarsu,Transition dynamics in theΛsCDM model: Implications for bound cosmic structures,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 10 103522, [arXiv:2402.05908]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    D. S. L. Soares,Newtonian gravitational deflection of light revisited,arXiv e-prints(Aug., 2005) physics/0508030, [physics/0508030]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  66. [66]

    Goswami and G

    R. Goswami and G. F. R. Ellis,Tidal forces are gravitational waves,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021), no. 8 085023, [arXiv:1912.00591]

    work page arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    J. D. Barrow, R. Maartens, and C. G. Tsagas,Cosmology with inhomogeneous magnetic fields,Phys. Rept.449(2007) 131–171, [astro-ph/0611537]. 43

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  68. [68]

    Analytic Continuation Of Chern-Simons Theory

    E. Witten,Analytic Continuation Of Chern-Simons Theory,AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math.50(2011) 347–446, [arXiv:1001.2933]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  69. [69]

    A covariant approach for perturbations of rotationally symmetric spacetimes

    C. Clarkson,A Covariant approach for perturbations of rotationally symmetric spacetimes,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 104034, [arXiv:0708.1398]. [72]DESCollaboration, T. McClintock et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of redMaPPer Galaxy Clusters,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.482(2019), no. 1 1352–1378, [arXiv:1805.00039]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  70. [70]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White,The Structure of cold dark matter halos,Astrophys. J.462(1996) 563–575, [astro-ph/9508025]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  71. [71]

    Luders,Proof of the TCP theorem,Annals Phys.2(1957) 1–15

    G. Luders,Proof of the TCP theorem,Annals Phys.2(1957) 1–15

    work page 1957

  72. [72]

    CPT Violation and the Standard Model

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky,CPT violation and the standard model,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 6760–6774, [hep-ph/9703464]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  73. [73]

    K. S. Kumar and J. a. Marto,Towards a Unitary Formulation of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: The Case of de Sitter Spacetime,Symmetry17(2025), no. 1 29, [arXiv:2305.06046]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Gazta˜ naga, K

    E. Gazta˜ naga, K. S. Kumar, and J. Marto,A new understanding of Einstein–Rosen bridges,Class. Quant. Grav.43(2026), no. 1 015023, [arXiv:2512.20691]

    work page arXiv 2026

  75. [75]

    E. C. G. Stueckelberg,Remarks on the creation of pairs of particles in the theory of relativity,Helv. Phys. Acta14(1941) 588–594

    work page 1941

  76. [76]

    R. P. Feynman,The Theory of positrons,Phys. Rev.76(1949) 749–759

    work page 1949

  77. [77]

    Darmois,Les ´ equations de la gravitation einsteinienne

    G. Darmois,Les ´ equations de la gravitation einsteinienne. Gauthier-Villars, 1927

    work page 1927

  78. [78]

    Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim

    W. Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim. B44S10(1966)

    work page 1966

  79. [79]

    [Erratum: Nuovo Cim.B 48, 463 (1967)]

    work page 1967

  80. [80]

    Levine,Groups of motions in conformally flat spaces,Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society42(1936), no

    J. Levine,Groups of motions in conformally flat spaces,Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society42(1936), no. 6 418 – 422

    work page 1936

Showing first 80 references.