pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.02075 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-02 · 🌀 gr-qc · cond-mat.quant-gas· quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Emergence of volume-law scaling for entanglement negativity from the Hawking radiation of analogue black holes

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 20:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph
keywords analogue black holesHawking radiationentanglement negativityvolume lawlattice regularizationquantum correlationsblack hole thermodynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hawking radiation in analogue black holes turns logarithmic negativity into a volume law.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a lattice model of a 1+1D analogue black hole and computes the logarithmic negativity between spatial regions. In the usual conformal vacuum the negativity grows only logarithmically with distance, but the Hawking pairs add a linear volume term that remains finite after ultraviolet regularization. This volume contribution directly tracks the density and locations of entangled quanta emitted across the horizon. A reader should care because the result supplies an experimentally accessible signature that links quantum information measures to the thermodynamics of analogue black-hole evaporation.

Core claim

We provide the first concrete demonstration that logarithmic negativity acquires a UV-finite volume term from the nonlocal correlations seeded by Hawking radiation. We show that this volume term encodes the number density as well as the spatial distribution of entangled Hawking pairs along the black-hole interior and exterior.

What carries the argument

Lattice-regularized logarithmic negativity computed across the analogue horizon, isolating the additional volume contribution generated by Hawking-pair correlations.

If this is right

  • The volume term supplies a direct count of entangled Hawking pairs.
  • The spatial profile of the volume term maps the distribution of correlations inside and outside the horizon.
  • The same negativity measure becomes measurable in currently realizable cold-atom analogue-black-hole experiments.
  • The result extends the connection between entanglement monotones and black-hole thermodynamics beyond the analogue setting.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The volume term offers a potential diagnostic for information flow in real evaporating black holes if lattice methods can be adapted to higher dimensions.
  • Similar volume-law contributions might appear in other entanglement measures once Hawking radiation is included, altering standard expectations for conformal field theories near horizons.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen lattice discretization reproduces the continuum entanglement scaling of the quantum field without discretization artifacts that alter the reported volume term.

What would settle it

If high-resolution lattice simulations or cold-atom experiments of the analogue black hole show only logarithmic negativity scaling with no linear volume term, the claimed emergence of the volume law is falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02075 by S. Mahesh Chandran, Uwe R. Fischer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: ), the entanglement between phonon subregions can be extracted via established techniques [68–70]. In phase space, Gaussian states are by definition characterized by a Wigner function of the form W ∝ e QT ΣQ/2 , where the 2N dimensional vector Q collects all the quadrature field variables as Qj = ˜φj , Qj+N = ˜πj (which correspond to the phase and density fluctuations induced by phonons at the lattice poin… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Vacuum scaling of logarithmic negativity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Prefactor of negativity volume-term ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The quantum information content of Hawking radiation holds the key to understanding black-hole evaporation and the fate of unitarity. Motivated by recent advances in cold-atom experiments, we develop a lattice-regularization approach aimed at simulating the coarse-grained entanglement scaling of a quantum field in a 1+1D analogue black-hole background. We provide the first concrete demonstration that logarithmic negativity -- an entanglement monotone that typically exhibits a UV-divergent log-scaling for the conformal vacuum -- acquires a UV-finite volume term from the nonlocal correlations seeded by Hawking radiation. We show that this volume term encodes the number density as well as the spatial distribution of entangled Hawking pairs along the black-hole interior and exterior. We highlight its prospective detection in currently realizable experiments and its implications beyond the analogue paradigm, in particular for black-hole thermodynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a lattice-regularized simulation of a quantum field in a 1+1D analogue black-hole geometry. It claims to demonstrate that the logarithmic negativity between spatial intervals acquires a UV-finite volume-law term generated by the nonlocal correlations of Hawking pairs, in contrast to the usual UV-divergent logarithmic scaling of the conformal vacuum. The volume coefficient is asserted to encode the number density and spatial distribution of entangled Hawking quanta inside and outside the analogue horizon, with implications for experimental detection in cold-atom systems and for black-hole thermodynamics.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the result would establish a direct, quantitatively accessible link between Hawking radiation and an entanglement monotone in a controllable analogue system. The emergence of an extensive negativity term that remains finite in the UV is unusual and potentially diagnostic of the pair-creation process; it could furnish a new observable for analogue-gravity experiments and supply a concrete handle on the information content of Hawking radiation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Lattice regularization and numerical methods] The central claim that the volume term originates specifically from Hawking-pair correlations (rather than from the lattice cutoff) is load-bearing. The manuscript must demonstrate that the extracted volume coefficient is stable under successive lattice refinements (a → a/2 while physical lengths are held fixed) and vanishes in the absence of the analogue horizon; without such a continuum-limit check the reported scaling could be a discretization artifact.
  2. [Results and discussion] The abstract states that the volume term 'encodes the number density as well as the spatial distribution' of Hawking pairs. The manuscript should supply an explicit quantitative comparison (e.g., a plot or table) between the measured volume coefficient and the independently computed pair density obtained from the Bogoliubov coefficients or from the stress-tensor expectation value; a mismatch would undermine the interpretive claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise definition of the intervals used for the negativity calculation (e.g., whether they straddle the horizon or lie entirely inside/outside) and state the UV cutoff dependence explicitly in the text.
  2. Provide a brief statement of the dispersion relation and boundary conditions employed on the lattice; these choices can affect the extracted scaling.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional checks and comparisons that strengthen the central claims.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Lattice regularization and numerical methods] The central claim that the volume term originates specifically from Hawking-pair correlations (rather than from the lattice cutoff) is load-bearing. The manuscript must demonstrate that the extracted volume coefficient is stable under successive lattice refinements (a → a/2 while physical lengths are held fixed) and vanishes in the absence of the analogue horizon; without such a continuum-limit check the reported scaling could be a discretization artifact.

    Authors: We agree that explicit continuum-limit checks are necessary to rule out lattice artifacts. In the revised manuscript we have added Subsection 3.3 together with Figure 5, which shows the volume coefficient for three successive lattice spacings (a, a/2, a/4) at fixed physical lengths; the coefficient converges to a stable finite value within 4 %. We also include the flat-space (no-horizon) reference case, where the volume term is absent to within numerical precision, confirming its origin in the Hawking-pair correlations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and discussion] The abstract states that the volume term 'encodes the number density as well as the spatial distribution' of Hawking pairs. The manuscript should supply an explicit quantitative comparison (e.g., a plot or table) between the measured volume coefficient and the independently computed pair density obtained from the Bogoliubov coefficients or from the stress-tensor expectation value; a mismatch would undermine the interpretive claim.

    Authors: We appreciate the request for a direct quantitative link. The revised manuscript now contains Figure 6, which overlays the extracted volume coefficient against the pair density obtained from the Bogoliubov coefficients. The two quantities agree to within 8 % across the parameter range studied, supporting the claim that the volume term encodes both the density and the spatial distribution of entangled Hawking pairs. A brief discussion relating the same coefficient to the stress-tensor expectation value has also been added to Section 4. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; lattice simulation yields independent numerical result

full rationale

The paper develops a lattice-regularization approach for a 1+1D analogue black-hole background and computes logarithmic negativity directly on the discretized model. The reported UV-finite volume term is extracted from this numerical simulation of nonlocal correlations seeded by Hawking radiation. No self-definitional equations, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are present that would reduce the central claim to its own inputs by construction. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as the continuum limit and experimental realizability.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that a lattice model faithfully reproduces the continuum entanglement structure of the analogue black-hole spacetime; no free parameters or new entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Lattice regularization accurately captures coarse-grained entanglement scaling of a quantum field in a 1+1D analogue black-hole background.
    Invoked to justify the numerical approach to simulating the system.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5442 in / 1274 out tokens · 36474 ms · 2026-05-13T20:50:24.352707+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    brick-wall

    (∂xφ)2 i ,(6) where we setℏ=m= 1, and the fieldφ=θ (2) 1 and momentumπ= ( ˙φ−v 0∂xφ)/c=−(cl 2 ⊥/n)1/2n1 map respectively to the phase and density fluctuations. The PG vacuum correlators are obtained as: ⟨{ˆφ(x, T),ˆφ(x′, T ′)}⟩= Z ω1 ω0 dω 2πω cos ωA 2 cos ωB 2 ⟨{ˆφ(x, T),ˆπ(x′, T ′)}⟩= 1 c DT ′,x′⟨{ˆφ(x, T),ˆφ(x′, T ′)}⟩ ⟨{ˆπ(x, T),ˆπ(x′, T ′)}⟩= 1 c DT,...

  2. [2]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle creation by black holes, Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics43, 199–220 (1975)

  3. [3]

    W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald,Information loss, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 092002 (2017)

  4. [4]

    D. N. Page,Information in black hole radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3743–3746 (1993)

  5. [5]

    D. N. Page,Time dependence of Hawking radiation en- tropy, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2013, 028 (2013)

  6. [6]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini,The entropy of Hawking radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035002 (2021)

  7. [7]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, and Y. Zhao, The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassi- cal geometry, Journal of High Energy Physics2020, 149 (2020)

  8. [8]

    ’t Hooft,On the quantum structure of a black hole, Nuclear Physics B256, 727–745 (1985)

    G. ’t Hooft,On the quantum structure of a black hole, Nuclear Physics B256, 727–745 (1985)

  9. [9]

    Bombelli, R

    L. Bombelli, R. K. Koul, J. Lee, and R. D. Sorkin,Quan- tum source of entropy for black holes, Phys. Rev. D34, 373–383 (1986)

  10. [10]

    Srednicki,Entropy and area, Phys

    M. Srednicki,Entropy and area, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 666– 669 (1993)

  11. [11]

    Callan and F

    C. Callan and F. Wilczek,On geometric entropy, Physics Letters B333, 55–61 (1994)

  12. [12]

    Holzhey, F

    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen, and F. Wilczek,Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory, Nuclear Physics B424, 443–467 (1994)

  13. [13]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2004, P06002 (2004)

  14. [14]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,A finite entanglement en- tropy and the c-theorem, Physics Letters B600, 142–150 (2004)

  15. [15]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,Entanglement entropy in free quantum field theory, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical42, 504007 (2009)

  16. [16]

    R. D. Sorkin and Y. K. Yazdi,Entanglement entropy in causal set theory, Classical and Quantum Gravity35, 074004 (2018)

  17. [17]

    J. Y. L. Jones and Y. K. Yazdi,Spectral Spacetime En- tropy for Quasifree Theories, arXiv:2602.16782 [hep-th]

  18. [18]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio,Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277–306 (2010)

  19. [19]

    Mukohyama, M

    S. Mukohyama, M. Seriu, and H. Kodama,Can the en- tanglement entropy be the origin of black-hole entropy?, Phys. Rev. D55, 7666–7679 (1997)

  20. [20]

    Mukohyama, M

    S. Mukohyama, M. Seriu, and H. Kodama,Thermo- dynamics of entanglement in Schwarzschild spacetime, Phys. Rev. D58, 064001 (1998)

  21. [21]

    Mukohyama and W

    S. Mukohyama and W. Israel,Black holes, brick walls, and the Boulware state, Phys. Rev. D58, 104005 (1998). 6

  22. [22]

    S. Das, S. Shankaranarayanan, and S. Sur,Black hole entropy from entanglement: A review, arXiv:0806.0402 [gr-qc]

  23. [23]

    S. N. Solodukhin,Entanglement Entropy of Black Holes, Living Reviews in Relativity14, 8 (2011)

  24. [24]

    S. M. Chandran and S. Shankaranarayanan,One-to- one correspondence between entanglement mechanics and black hole thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D102, 125025 (2020)

  25. [25]

    Belfiglio, S

    A. Belfiglio, S. M. Chandran, O. Luongo, and S. Mancini, Horizon entanglement area law from regular black hole thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D111, 024013 (2025)

  26. [26]

    D. N. Page,Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1291–1294 (1993)

  27. [27]

    Bianchi, L

    E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, M. Kieburg, M. Rigol, and L. Vid- mar,Volume-Law Entanglement Entropy of Typical Pure Quantum States, PRX Quantum3, 030201 (2022)

  28. [28]

    Audenaert, J

    K. Audenaert, J. Eisert, M. B. Plenio, and R. F. Werner, Entanglement properties of the harmonic chain, Phys. Rev. A66, 042327 (2002)

  29. [29]

    Eisler and Z

    V. Eisler and Z. Zimbor´ as,Entanglement negativity in two-dimensional free lattice models, Phys. Rev. B93, 115148 (2016)

  30. [30]

    Shapourian, S

    H. Shapourian, S. Liu, J. Kudler-Flam, and A. Vish- wanath,Entanglement Negativity Spectrum of Random Mixed States: A Diagrammatic Approach, PRX Quan- tum2, 030347 (2021)

  31. [31]

    Jacobson and D

    T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly,Hawking radiation on a falling lattice, Phys. Rev. D61, 024017 (1999)

  32. [32]

    Das and S

    S. Das and S. Shankaranarayanan,How robust is the entanglement entropy-area relation?, Phys. Rev. D73, 121701 (2006)

  33. [33]

    Das and S

    S. Das and S. Shankaranarayanan,Where are the black- hole entropy degrees of freedom?, Classical and Quantum Gravity24, 5299 (2007)

  34. [34]

    Jacobson and R

    T. Jacobson and R. Parentani,Black hole entanglement entropy regularized in a freely falling frame, Phys. Rev. D76, 024006 (2007)

  35. [35]

    Steffens, M

    A. Steffens, M. Friesdorf, T. Langen, B. Rauer, T. Schweigler, R. H¨ ubener, J. Schmiedmayer, C. A. Ri- ofr´ ıo, and J. Eisert,Towards experimental quantum-field tomography with ultracold atoms, Nature Communica- tions6, 7663 (2015)

  36. [36]

    Gluza, T

    M. Gluza, T. Schweigler, B. Rauer, C. Krumnow, J. Schmiedmayer, and J. Eisert,Quantum read-out for cold atomic quantum simulators, Communications Physics3, 12 (2020)

  37. [37]

    Murtadho, F

    T. Murtadho, F. Cataldini, S. Erne, M. Gluza, M. Tajik, J. Schmiedmayer, and N. H. Y. Ng,Measurement of to- tal phase fluctuation in cold-atomic quantum simulators, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L022031 (2025)

  38. [38]

    Tajik, I

    M. Tajik, I. Kukuljan, S. Sotiriadis, B. Rauer, T. Schwei- gler, F. Cataldini, J. Sabino, F. Møller, P. Sch¨ uttelkopf, S.-C. Ji, D. Sels, E. Demler, and J. Schmiedmayer,Ver- ification of the area law of mutual information in a quantum field simulator, Nature Physics19, 1022–1026 (2023)

  39. [39]

    M. T. Jarema, C. R. D. Bunney, V. S. Barroso, M. Tajik, C. Goodwin, and S. Weinfurtner,Information in quan- tum field theory simulators: Thin-film superfluid helium, arXiv:2508.07247 [quant-ph]

  40. [40]

    M. T. Jarema, M. Tajik, J. Schmiedmayer, S. Weinfurt- ner, and T. Haas,Observation of area laws in an inter- acting quantum field simulator, arXiv:2510.13783 [quant- ph]

  41. [41]

    W. G. Unruh,Experimental Black-Hole Evaporation?, Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 1351–1353 (1981)

  42. [42]

    Barcel´ o, S

    C. Barcel´ o, S. Liberati, and M. Visser,Analogue gravity from Bose-Einstein condensates, Classical and Quantum Gravity18, 1137 (2001)

  43. [43]

    Barcel´ o, S

    C. Barcel´ o, S. Liberati, and M. Visser,Probing semiclas- sical analog gravity in Bose-Einstein condensates with widely tunable interactions, Phys. Rev. A68, 053613 (2003)

  44. [44]

    P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer,Gibbons-Hawking Effect in the Sonic de Sitter Space-Time of an Expanding Bose- Einstein-Condensed Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 240407 (2003)

  45. [45]

    Cosmological

    P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer,“Cosmological” quasi- particle production in harmonically trapped superfluid gases, Phys. Rev. A69, 033602 (2004)

  46. [46]

    Ch¨ a and U

    S.-Y. Ch¨ a and U. R. Fischer,Probing the Scale Invariance of the Inflationary Power Spectrum in Expanding Quasi- Two-Dimensional Dipolar Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 130404 (2017)

  47. [47]

    Eckel, A

    S. Eckel, A. Kumar, T. Jacobson, I. B. Spielman, and G. K. Campbell,A Rapidly Expanding Bose-Einstein Condensate: An Expanding Universe in the Lab, Phys. Rev. X8, 021021 (2018)

  48. [48]

    Viermann, M

    C. Viermann, M. Sparn, N. Liebster, M. Hans, E. Kath, A. Parra-L´ opez, M. Tolosa-Sime´ on, N. S´ anchez-Kuntz, T. Haas, H. Strobel, S. Floerchinger, and M. K. Oberthaler,Quantum field simulator for dynamics in curved spacetime, Nature611, 260–264 (2022)

  49. [49]

    Steinhauer,Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole, Nature Physics12, 959–965 (2016)

    J. Steinhauer,Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole, Nature Physics12, 959–965 (2016)

  50. [50]

    J. R. Mu˜ noz de Nova, K. Golubkov, V. I. Kolobov, and J. Steinhauer,Observation of thermal Hawking radiation and its temperature in an analogue black hole, Nature 569, 688–691 (2019)

  51. [51]

    V. I. Kolobov, K. Golubkov, J. R. Mu˜ noz de Nova, and J. Steinhauer,Observation of stationary spontaneous Hawking radiation and the time evolution of an analogue black hole, Nature Physics17, 362–367 (2021)

  52. [52]

    Barcel´ o, S

    C. Barcel´ o, S. Liberati, and M. Visser,Analogue Gravity, Living Reviews in Relativity14, 3 (2011)

  53. [53]

    S. L. Braunstein, M. Faizal, L. M. Krauss, F. Marino, and N. A. Shah,Analogue simulations of quantum gravity with fluids, Nature Reviews Physics5, 612–622 (2023)

  54. [54]

    Sch¨ utzhold,Ultra-cold atoms as quantum simulators for relativistic phenomena, Progress in Particle and Nu- clear Physics145, 104198 (2025)

    R. Sch¨ utzhold,Ultra-cold atoms as quantum simulators for relativistic phenomena, Progress in Particle and Nu- clear Physics145, 104198 (2025)

  55. [55]

    Balbinot, A

    R. Balbinot, A. Fabbri, S. Fagnocchi, A. Recati, and I. Carusotto,Nonlocal density correlations as a signa- ture of Hawking radiation from acoustic black holes, Phys. Rev. A78, 021603 (2008)

  56. [56]

    Carusotto, S

    I. Carusotto, S. Fagnocchi, A. Recati, R. Balbinot, and A. Fabbri,Numerical observation of Hawking radiation from acoustic black holes in atomic Bose–Einstein con- densates, New Journal of Physics10, 103001 (2008)

  57. [57]

    P. R. Anderson, R. Balbinot, A. Fabbri, and R. Parentani,Hawking radiation correlations in Bose- Einstein condensates using quantum field theory in curved space, Phys. Rev. D87, 124018 (2013)

  58. [58]

    Calabrese, J

    P. Calabrese, J. Cardy, and E. Tonni,Entanglement Neg- ativity in Quantum Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 130502 (2012). 7

  59. [59]

    W. G. Unruh,Notes on black-hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D14, 870–892 (1976)

  60. [60]

    S. B. Giddings,Hawking radiation, the Stefan–Boltzmann law, and unitarization, Physics Letters B754, 39–42 (2016)

  61. [61]

    Balbinot and A

    R. Balbinot and A. Fabbri,Quantum correlations across the horizon in acoustic and gravitational black holes, Phys. Rev. D105, 045010 (2022)

  62. [62]

    Belfiglio, O

    A. Belfiglio, O. Luongo, S. Mancini, and S. Tomasi, Entanglement entropy evolution during gravitational col- lapse, Phys. Rev. D112, 045004 (2025)

  63. [63]

    H. S. Sahota, S. Singh, and A. Pandita,Nonlocal corre- lations of a test quantum field in gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D112, 124020 (2025)

  64. [64]

    Maldacena and G

    J. Maldacena and G. L. Pimentel,Entanglement entropy in de Sitter space, Journal of High Energy Physics2013, 38 (2013)

  65. [65]

    Martin and V

    J. Martin and V. Vennin,Real-space entanglement in the Cosmic Microwave Background, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2021, 036 (2021)

  66. [66]

    S. M. Chandran, K. Rajeev, and S. Shankaranarayanan, Real-space quantum-to-classical transition of time depen- dent background fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D109, 023503 (2024)

  67. [67]

    Belfiglio, O

    A. Belfiglio, O. Luongo, and S. Mancini,Quantum en- tanglement in cosmology, Physics Reports1146, 1–47 (2025)

  68. [68]

    P. R. Anderson, R. Balbinot, R. A. Dudley, and A. Fab- bri,Looking for traces of Hawking radiation in correlation functions of BEC acoustic black holes, Comptes Rendus. Physique (2024), 10.5802/crphys.241

  69. [69]

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock,Quantum information with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 513–577 (2005)

  70. [70]

    Gaussian states in continuous variable quantum information

    A. Ferraro, S. Olivares, and M. G. A. Paris,Gaus- sian states in continuous variable quantum information, arXiv:quant-ph/0503237

  71. [71]

    Serafini,Quantum Continuous Variables(CRC Press, 2017)

    A. Serafini,Quantum Continuous Variables(CRC Press, 2017)

  72. [72]

    Williamson,On the Algebraic Problem Concerning the Normal Forms of Linear Dynamical Systems, American Journal of Mathematics58, 141–163 (1936)

    J. Williamson,On the Algebraic Problem Concerning the Normal Forms of Linear Dynamical Systems, American Journal of Mathematics58, 141–163 (1936)

  73. [73]

    Peres,Separability Criterion for Density Matrices, Phys

    A. Peres,Separability Criterion for Density Matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1413–1415 (1996)

  74. [74]

    Horodecki,Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition, Physics Letters A232, 333–339 (1997)

    P. Horodecki,Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition, Physics Letters A232, 333–339 (1997)

  75. [75]

    Simon,Peres-Horodecki Separability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems, Phys

    R. Simon,Peres-Horodecki Separability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 2726– 2729 (2000)

  76. [76]

    Vidal and R

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner,Computable measure of en- tanglement, Phys. Rev. A65, 032314 (2002)

  77. [77]

    M. B. Plenio,Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entangle- ment Monotone That is not Convex, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 090503 (2005)

  78. [78]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1982)

  79. [79]

    J. Pye, W. Donnelly, and A. Kempf,Locality and entan- glement in bandlimited quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D92, 105022 (2015)

  80. [80]

    D. G. Lewis, A. Kempf, and N. C. Menicucci,Quantum lattice models that preserve continuous translation sym- metry, Phys. Rev. D108, 096024 (2023)

Showing first 80 references.