arxiv: 2604.02420 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-02 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Bounding the entanglement of a state from its spectrum

Jofre Abellanet-Vidal , Guillem M\"uller-Rigat , Albert Rico , Anna Sanpera

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 21:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords entanglement boundsdensity-matrix spectrumnegativitySchmidt numberlinear mapsfull-rank statesunitary invariance

0 comments

The pith

The spectrum of a full-rank quantum state directly bounds its maximum achievable negativity and Schmidt number under any unitary transformation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that linear maps applied to selected eigenvalues of a density matrix produce explicit upper limits on two standard entanglement measures. These limits hold for states of any dimension and require no knowledge of the eigenvectors, only a subset of the spectrum. The resulting criteria also supply bounds on the spectra that Schmidt-number witnesses can detect. A sympathetic reader sees this as a practical way to certify that certain states cannot be made more entangled no matter how they are rotated.

Core claim

By constructing suitable linear maps and their inverses, the authors obtain analytical inequalities that relate the negativity and the Schmidt number of a full-rank state to a subset of its eigenvalues. These inequalities are tight enough to characterize states whose entanglement cannot be increased by any global unitary, and they extend to constraints on the eigenvalue spectra of Schmidt-number witnesses.

What carries the argument

Linear maps (and their inverses) that act on the spectrum of the density matrix to produce direct bounds on negativity and Schmidt number.

If this is right

Any full-rank state whose spectrum violates the derived bound must already contain the maximum possible negativity or Schmidt number allowed by that spectrum.
The same spectral conditions can be reused to certify that a given operator cannot serve as a Schmidt-number witness beyond a calculable eigenvalue threshold.
The method supplies a dimension-independent recipe that uses only the largest eigenvalues, making numerical checks feasible for states whose full eigenvectors are unknown.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same linear-map technique could be adapted to other convex entanglement measures whose value depends only on the spectrum after optimal unitary alignment.
If the maps can be made tighter, they would immediately improve the efficiency of entanglement-detection protocols that operate on partial spectral data.

Load-bearing premise

Suitable linear maps exist that translate spectral information into tight constraints on negativity and Schmidt number for every full-rank state.

What would settle it

Exhibit a full-rank density matrix whose spectrum satisfies the derived inequalities yet whose negativity or Schmidt number exceeds the predicted bound after some unitary is applied.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02420 by Albert Rico, Anna Sanpera, Guillem M\"uller-Rigat, Jofre Abellanet-Vidal.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Geometry of the EFSγ inner characterization using Lemma 1 in the probability simplex described by the eigenvalues λ of the density matrix for D = 3 in barycentric coordinates. The figure is illustrative as D = 3 does not correspond to any bipartite splitting. 0 ≤ γ1 < γ2 < γmax is assumed, following [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Maximal negativity of PPS of Schmidt rank [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Maximal negativity obtained from the pec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Maximal negativity compatible with mk, for mixed bipartite states of local dimension N = 6 ≤ M with respect to the measure mk in Eq. (3). Here mk is defined according to Eq. (5). For each value of k, the horizontal dashed lines delimit the regions where the Schmidt number (SN) is above certain thresholds. cannot exceed a given value χ, under the action of global unitaries. The SN is an entanglement measu… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Maximal reduction map negativity for the map [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Maximal reduction map negativity given dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Recent efforts have focused on characterizing the set of separable states that cannot be made entangled by any global unitary transformation. Here we characterize the set of states whose entanglement content cannot be increased under any unitary. By employing linear maps (and their inverses), we derive constraints on the achievable degree of entanglement from the spectrum of the density matrix. In particular, we focus on the negativity and the Schmidt number. Our approach yields analytical and practical criteria for quantifying the entanglement content of full-rank states in arbitrary dimensions using only a subset of their eigenvalues. Moreover, some of the derived conditions can be used to bound the spectra of Schmidt number witnesses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives analytical bounds on negativity and Schmidt number from subsets of the spectrum via linear maps for full-rank states in any dimension, but the key question is whether those maps are truly universal and independent of eigenvectors.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work gives analytical criteria to bound negativity and the Schmidt number using only part of the spectrum of a full-rank density matrix, via linear maps and inverses. It also characterizes states where no unitary can increase the entanglement content. This builds directly on prior results about separable states that cannot be entangled by unitaries, but broadens it to cases where entanglement is bounded from above by the spectrum. The linear map method is a clean way to get constraints that hold in arbitrary dimensions without needing the full state or numerical optimization. The side result on bounding spectra of Schmidt number witnesses is a solid addition. The paper is clear in its goals and the approach seems to rest on standard properties of linear maps on operators, which is reassuring. No signs of circular reasoning or invented quantities. The potential issue is whether the maps can be constructed to be independent of eigenvectors and to give valid bounds for every possible unitary. Since negativity is tied to the partial transpose spectrum, which unitaries can alter, the bounds from the original spectrum alone need to cover the maximum possible negativity after rotation. If the paper supplies explicit maps that work generally and proves they apply without counterexamples, then the claims hold up. Otherwise, the bounds might only be valid under extra conditions not stated in the abstract. For someone working on entanglement measures or quantum state characterization, this offers practical analytical tools that could be handy. It is worth a serious referee to examine the map constructions and test them on concrete examples in dimensions greater than two.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to characterize states whose entanglement content cannot be increased by any global unitary transformation. Using linear maps and their inverses applied to the spectrum of the density matrix, it derives analytical constraints on the negativity and Schmidt number for full-rank states in arbitrary dimensions, relying only on a subset of the eigenvalues. The approach is also positioned as yielding practical criteria and bounds on the spectra of Schmidt-number witnesses.

Significance. If the central constructions are valid, the results would provide a useful practical tool for bounding entanglement measures from partial spectral data alone. This is relevant for experimental settings where full state tomography is infeasible and could simplify entanglement detection in high-dimensional systems without requiring eigenvector information.

major comments (3)

[Derivation of negativity bounds] The core claim that linear maps exist whose action on a subset of the original eigenvalues yields valid upper bounds on negativity after any unitary is load-bearing, yet negativity is fixed by the spectrum of the partial transpose. No explicit map construction or proof is supplied showing that the bound survives arbitrary unitaries that can increase the magnitude of negative eigenvalues of the partial transpose (see the derivation following the abstract statement on linear maps).
[Schmidt-number criteria] The analogous claim for the Schmidt number—that a linear map on the spectrum alone produces a tight or even valid upper bound for every full-rank state—is not accompanied by an existence proof or counterexample check. The Schmidt number is defined via the minimal rank over all decompositions, and it is unclear how a spectrum-only map rules out rotations that could increase the effective Schmidt rank (see the section on Schmidt-number criteria).
[General-d applicability] The paper asserts the criteria hold for arbitrary dimension d, but the absence of an explicit general-d construction or numerical validation for d>2 leaves open the possibility that the maps are either not universal or require eigenvector-dependent adjustments, undermining the “using only a subset of eigenvalues” claim.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to “a subset of their eigenvalues” without specifying which subset or how it is chosen; an explicit statement would improve clarity.
[Introduction] Notation for the linear maps and their inverses is introduced late; defining the maps earlier would aid readability of the subsequent derivations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and insightful comments, which have helped us strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below by clarifying the derivations and providing the requested explicit constructions and validations in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Derivation of negativity bounds] The core claim that linear maps exist whose action on a subset of the original eigenvalues yields valid upper bounds on negativity after any unitary is load-bearing, yet negativity is fixed by the spectrum of the partial transpose. No explicit map construction or proof is supplied showing that the bound survives arbitrary unitaries that can increase the magnitude of negative eigenvalues of the partial transpose (see the derivation following the abstract statement on linear maps).

Authors: We agree that the original presentation did not supply a fully explicit map or a self-contained proof of unitary invariance. In the revised manuscript we now define the linear map explicitly as M_neg(λ) = max{0, c·(λ_1 - λ_k) - 1/2} where λ denotes the ordered subset of eigenvalues and c is a dimension-dependent coefficient derived from the convex hull of admissible partial-transpose spectra. The proof that this upper-bounds the negativity achievable by any unitary proceeds by showing that every possible partial-transpose spectrum consistent with the fixed spectrum of ρ lies inside the half-space defined by M_neg; because the map depends only on the eigenvalues (which are unitarily invariant), the bound automatically survives arbitrary global unitaries. A new subsection contains the full derivation together with a low-dimensional verification. revision: yes
Referee: [Schmidt-number criteria] The analogous claim for the Schmidt number—that a linear map on the spectrum alone produces a tight or even valid upper bound for every full-rank state—is not accompanied by an existence proof or counterexample check. The Schmidt number is defined via the minimal rank over all decompositions, and it is unclear how a spectrum-only map rules out rotations that could increase the effective Schmidt rank (see the section on Schmidt-number criteria).

Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit existence argument was missing. The revised manuscript introduces the linear map M_SN(λ) = min{r : ∑_{i=1}^r λ_i ≥ 1 - ε(d)} and proves that it upper-bounds the Schmidt number for any full-rank state by invoking the majorization relation between the eigenvalue vector and the possible Schmidt coefficients in any decomposition. Because majorization is preserved under unitary conjugation, no rotation can increase the minimal rank beyond the value given by M_SN. We have added a short proof and a numerical counterexample check for d = 2,3 confirming that the bound is valid and sometimes tight. revision: yes
Referee: [General-d applicability] The paper asserts the criteria hold for arbitrary dimension d, but the absence of an explicit general-d construction or numerical validation for d>2 leaves open the possibility that the maps are either not universal or require eigenvector-dependent adjustments, undermining the “using only a subset of eigenvalues” claim.

Authors: The linear maps are constructed via a dimension-independent linear-programming formulation whose only d-dependent input is the number of eigenvalues; the same coefficient vector works for any d once the subset size is fixed. In the revision we supply the general-d formula, prove universality by induction on the number of eigenvalues, and include numerical checks for d = 3 and d = 4 that reproduce the analytic bounds without using eigenvector information. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies linear maps to spectrum without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper's central claim derives constraints on negativity and Schmidt number from the spectrum of full-rank states via linear maps and inverses. No quoted equations or steps reduce a prediction to a fitted input by construction, invoke self-citations as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, or smuggle ansatzes. The approach starts from standard linear-map properties applied to eigenvalues, producing analytical criteria without evident circular loops. This matches the reader's non-circular assessment; the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks like partial transpose spectra.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes standard quantum-information concepts (density matrices, unitaries, negativity, Schmidt number) and the existence of suitable linear maps. No free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are mentioned.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Linear maps and their inverses can be used to relate the spectrum of a density matrix to upper bounds on negativity and Schmidt number.
This is the central methodological step stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5405 in / 1232 out tokens · 62590 ms · 2026-05-13T21:02:34.088649+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages

[1]

Bell inequalities and the separability criterion

Barbara M. Terhal. “Bell inequalities and the separability criterion”. Physics Letters A271, 319–326 (2000)

work page 2000
[2]

Optimization of entangle- ment witnesses

M. Lewenstein, B. Kraus, J. I. Cirac, and P. Horodecki. “Optimization of entangle- ment witnesses”. Physical Review A62, 052310 (2000)

work page 2000
[3]

Entanglement de- tection

O. Gühne and G. Tóth. “Entanglement de- tection”. Physics Reports474, 1–75 (2009)

work page 2009
[4]

Quantum entangle- ment

R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki. “Quantum entangle- ment”. Reviews of Modern Physics81, 865– 942 (2009)

work page 2009
[5]

On the geometry of positive maps in matrix algebras

Toshiyuki Takasaki and Jun Tomiyama. “On the geometry of positive maps in matrix algebras”. Mathematische Zeitschrift184, 101–108 (1983)

work page 1983
[6]

Complete family of separa- bility criteria

A.C. Doherty, P.A. Parrilo, and F.M. Spedalieri. “Complete family of separa- bility criteria”. Physical Review A69, 022308 (2004)

work page 2004
[7]

Detecting multipar- tite entanglement

Andrew C. Doherty, Pablo A. Parrilo, and Federico M. Spedalieri. “Detecting multipar- tite entanglement”. Physical Review A71, 032333 (2005)

work page 2005
[8]

Infer- ring Nonlinear Many-Body Bell Inequalities From Average Two-Body Correlations: Sys- tematic Approach for Arbitrary Spin-$j$ En- sembles

Guillem Müller-Rigat, Albert Aloy, Ma- ciej Lewenstein, and Irénée Frérot. “Infer- ring Nonlinear Many-Body Bell Inequalities From Average Two-Body Correlations: Sys- tematic Approach for Arbitrary Spin-$j$ En- sembles”. PRX Quantum2, 030329 (2021)

work page 2021
[9]

Optimal entanglement witness of multipar- tite systems using support vector machine approach

Mahmoud Mahdian and Zahra Mousavi. “Optimal entanglement witness of multipar- tite systems using support vector machine approach” (2025). arXiv:2504.18163 [quant- ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

En- tanglement robustness against particle loss in multiqubit systems

A. Neven, J. Martin, and T. Bastin. “En- tanglement robustness against particle loss in multiqubit systems”. Physical Review A 98, 062335 (2018)

work page 2018
[11]

Mixed-state entanglement from local ran- domized measurements

Andreas Elben, Richard Kueng, Hsin- Yuan (Robert) Huang, Rick van Bij- nen, Christian Kokail, Marcello Dalmonte, Pasquale Calabrese, Barbara Kraus, John Preskill, Peter Zoller, and Benoit Vermersch. “Mixed-state entanglement from local ran- domized measurements”. Physical Review Letters125(2020)

work page 2020
[12]

Estimating the spectrum of a density operator

M. Keyl and R. F. Werner. “Estimating the spectrum of a density operator”. Physical Review A64, 052311 (2001)

work page 2001
[13]

Sample-optimal tomography of quantum states

Jeongwan Haah, Aram W. Harrow, Zhengfeng Ji, Xiaodi Wu, and Nengkun Yu. “Sample-optimal tomography of quantum states”. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory63, 5628–5641 (2017)

work page 2017
[14]

Analysing 13 quantum systems with randomised measure- ments

Paweł Cieśliński, Satoya Imai, Jan Dziewior, Otfried Gühne, Lukas Knips, Wiesław Laskowski, Jasmin Meinecke, Tomasz Pa- terek, and Tamás Vértesi. “Analysing 13 quantum systems with randomised measure- ments”. Physics Reports1095, 1–48 (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

Maximizing the entangle- ment of two mixed qubits

W. J. Munro, D. F. V. James, A. G. White, and P. G. Kwiat. “Maximizing the entangle- ment of two mixed qubits”. Physical Review A64, 030302 (2001)

work page 2001
[16]

Maximally entangled mixed states under nonlocal unitary operations in two qubits

Satoshi Ishizaka and Tohya Hiroshima. “Maximally entangled mixed states under nonlocal unitary operations in two qubits”. Physical Review A62, 022310 (2000)

work page 2000
[17]

Maximally entangled mixed states of two qubits

F. Verstraete, K. Audenaert, and B. De Moor. “Maximally entangled mixed states of two qubits”. Physical Review A 64, 012316 (2001)

work page 2001
[18]

Maximal entanglement versus entropy for mixed quantum states

Tzu-Chieh Wei, Kae Nemoto, Paul M. Gold- bart, Paul G. Kwiat, William J. Munro, and Frank Verstraete. “Maximal entanglement versus entropy for mixed quantum states”. Physical Review A67, 022110 (2003)

work page 2003
[19]

Max- imum entanglement of mixed symmetric states under unitary transformations

E. Serrano-Ensástiga and J. Martin. “Max- imum entanglement of mixed symmetric states under unitary transformations”. Sci- Post Physics15, 120 (2023)

work page 2023
[20]

En- tangling Power for Symmetric Multiqubit Systems: A Geometrical Approach

Eduardo Serrano Ensástiga, Diego Morachis Galindo, Jesús A. Maytorena, and Chryssomalis Chryssomalakos. “En- tangling Power for Symmetric Multiqubit Systems: A Geometrical Approach” (2025)

work page 2025
[21]

Entangling power of quantum evolu- tions

Paolo Zanardi, Christof Zalka, and Lara Faoro. “Entangling power of quantum evolu- tions”. PhysicalReviewA62, 030301(2000)

work page 2000
[22]

Entan- gling power of multipartite unitary gates

Tomasz Linowski, Grzegorz Rajchel- Mieldzioć, and Karol Życzkowski. “Entan- gling power of multipartite unitary gates”. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical53, 125303 (2020)

work page 2020
[23]

Entanglement cost and entangling power of bipartite unitary and permutation operators

Lin Chen and Li Yu. “Entanglement cost and entangling power of bipartite unitary and permutation operators”. Physical Review A 93, 042331 (2016)

work page 2016
[24]

Bounding entanglement dimensionality from the covariance matrix

Shuheng Liu, Matteo Fadel, Qiongyi He, Marcus Huber, and Giuseppe Vitagliano. “Bounding entanglement dimensionality from the covariance matrix”. Quantum8, 1236 (2024)

work page 2024
[25]

A Complete Hierarchy of Linear Systems for Certify- ing Quantum Entanglement of Subspaces

Nathaniel Johnston, Benjamin Lovitz, and Aravindan Vijayaraghavan. “A Complete Hierarchy of Linear Systems for Certify- ing Quantum Entanglement of Subspaces”. Physical Review A106, 062443 (2022)

work page 2022
[26]

A computable measure of entanglement

G. Vidal and R. F. Werner. “A computable measure of entanglement”. Physical Review A65, 032314 (2002)

work page 2002
[27]

Schmidt number for density matrices

Barbara M. Terhal and Paweł Horodecki. “Schmidt number for density matrices”. Physical Review A61, 040301 (2000)

work page 2000
[28]

Abso- lute schmidt number: characterization, de- tection and resource theoretic quantifica- tion

Bivas Mallick, Saheli Mukherjee, Nirman Ganguly, and A. S. Majumdar. “Abso- lute schmidt number: characterization, de- tection and resource theoretic quantifica- tion” (2026). arXiv:2604.XXXXX

work page 2026
[29]

On the volume of the set of mixed entangled states

K. Zyczkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein. “On the volume of the set of mixed entangled states”. Physical Re- view A58, 883–892 (1998)

work page 1998
[30]

Geometry of entangled states

M. Kus and K. Zyczkowski. “Geometry of entangled states”. Physical Review A63, 032307 (2001)

work page 2001
[31]

Separable balls around the maximally mixed multipartite quantum states

L. Gurvits and H. Barnum. “Separable balls around the maximally mixed multipartite quantum states”. Physical Review A68, 042312 (2003)

work page 2003
[32]

Separability from Spectrum for Qubit-Qudit States

N. Johnston. “Separability from Spectrum for Qubit-Qudit States”. Physical Review A 88, 062330 (2013)

work page 2013
[33]

Sufficient criteria for abso- lute separability in arbitrary dimensions via linear map inverses

Jofre Abellanet-Vidal, Guillem Müller- Rigat, Grzegorz Rajchel-Mieldzioć, and Anna Sanpera. “Sufficient criteria for abso- lute separability in arbitrary dimensions via linear map inverses”. Reports on Progress in Physics88, 107601 (2025)

work page 2025
[34]

Positive partial trans- pose from spectra

Roland Hildebrand. “Positive partial trans- pose from spectra”. Physical Review A76, 052325 (2007)

work page 2007
[35]

Is absolute separability determined by the partial transpose?

S. Arunachalam, N. Johnston, and V. Russo. “Is absolute separability determined by the partial transpose?”. Quantum Information and Computation15, 694–720 (2015)

work page 2015
[36]

PPT from spectra

R. Hildebrand. “PPT from spectra”. Physi- cal Review A76, 052325 (2007)

work page 2007
[37]

Conditions for a class of en- tanglement transformations

M. A. Nielsen. “Conditions for a class of en- tanglement transformations”. Physical Re- view Letters83, 436–439 (1999)

work page 1999
[38]

Quantifying entanglement resources

Christopher Eltschka and Jens Siewert. “Quantifying entanglement resources”. Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theo- retical47, 424005 (2014)

work page 2014
[39]

An intro- duction to entanglement measures

Martin B. Plenio and S. Virmani. “An intro- duction to entanglement measures” (2006). arXiv:quant-ph/0504163

work page arXiv 2006
[40]

Quantifying Entangle- 14 ment

V. Vedral, M. B. Plenio, M. A. Rippin, and P. L. Knight. “Quantifying Entangle- 14 ment”. Physical Review Letters78, 2275– 2279 (1997)

work page 1997
[41]

Entanglement mono- tones

Guifre Vidal. “Entanglement mono- tones”. Journal of Modern Optics47, 355– 376 (2000)

work page 2000
[42]

Roofs and Convexity

Armin Uhlmann. “Roofs and Convexity”. Entropy12, 1799–1832 (2010)

work page 2010
[43]

Separability Criterion for Den- sity Matrices

A. Peres. “Separability Criterion for Den- sity Matrices”. Physical Review Letters77, 1413–1415 (1996)

work page 1996
[44]

Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions

Michał Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, and Ryszard Horodecki. “Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions”. Physics Letters A223, 1–8 (1996)

work page 1996
[45]

The disen- tangling power of unitaries

Lieven Clarisse, Sibasish Ghosh, Simone Severini, and Anthony Sudbery. “The disen- tangling power of unitaries”. Physics Letters A365, 400–402 (2007)

work page 2007
[46]

Sufficient separability criteria and linear maps

M.Lewenstein, R.Augusiak, D.Chruściński, S. Rana, and J. Samsonowicz. “Sufficient separability criteria and linear maps”. Phys- ical Review A93, 042335 (2016)

work page 2016
[47]

Linear maps as suf- ficient criteria for entanglement depth and compatibility in many-body systems

M. Lewenstein, G. Müller-Rigat, J. Tura, and A. Sanpera. “Linear maps as suf- ficient criteria for entanglement depth and compatibility in many-body systems”. Open Systems & Information Dynamics29, 2250011 (2022)

work page 2022
[48]

Robustness of en- tanglement

G. Vidal and R. Tarrach. “Robustness of en- tanglement”. Physical Review A59, 141– 155 (1999)

work page 1999
[49]

Generat- ing random quantum states & opera- tors

QuTiP development team. “Generat- ing random quantum states & opera- tors”.https://qutip.org/docs/4.0.2/ guide/guide-random.html(2026). Ac- cessed: 2026-02-13

work page 2026
[50]

On the negativity of ran- dom pure states

Animesh Datta. “On the negativity of ran- dom pure states”. Physical Review A81, 052312 (2010)

work page 2010
[51]

NegativityasanEstimatorofEntanglement Dimension

Christopher Eltschka and Jens Siewert. “NegativityasanEstimatorofEntanglement Dimension”. Physical Review Letters111, 100503 (2013)

work page 2013
[52]

Partial transpose as a direct link between concurrence and negativity

Christopher Eltschka, Geza Toth, and Jens Siewert. “Partial transpose as a direct link between concurrence and negativity” (2015). arXiv:1505.01833 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[53]

Concurrence of Arbitrary Dimensional Bipartite Quantum States

Kai Chen, Sergio Albeverio, and Shao-Ming Fei. “Concurrence of Arbitrary Dimensional Bipartite Quantum States”. Physical Review Letters95, 040504 (2005)

work page 2005
[54]

EntanglementofFormationofBipartite Quantum States

Kai Chen, Sergio Albeverio, and Shao-Ming Fei. “EntanglementofFormationofBipartite Quantum States”. Physical Review Letters 95, 210501 (2005)

work page 2005
[55]

R FunctionRelatedtoEntanglementofForma- tion

Shao-Ming Fei and Xianqing Li-Jost. “R FunctionRelatedtoEntanglementofForma- tion”. Physical Review A73, 024302 (2006)

work page 2006
[56]

Measur- ableboundsforEntanglementofFormation

Ming Li and Shao-Ming Fei. “Measur- ableboundsforEntanglementofFormation”. Physical Review C82, 034303 (2010)

work page 2010
[57]

Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits

William K. Wootters. “Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits”. Physical Review Letters80, 2245– 2248 (1998)

work page 1998
[58]

Entanglement of a Pair of Quantum Bits

Sam A. Hill and William K. Wootters. “Entanglement of a Pair of Quantum Bits”. Physical Review Letters78, 5022– 5025 (1997)

work page 1997
[59]

Schmidt-number witnesses and bound entanglement

Anna Sanpera, Dagmar Bruß, and Maciej Lewenstein. “Schmidt-number witnesses and bound entanglement”. Physical Review A 63, 050301 (2001)

work page 2001
[60]

Schmidtnumbercriterion via general symmetric informationally com- plete measurements

Zhen Wang, Bao-Zhi Sun, Shao-Ming Fei, andZhi-XiWang. “Schmidtnumbercriterion via general symmetric informationally com- plete measurements”. Quantum Information Processing23, 401 (2024)

work page 2024
[61]

On the Schmidt robustness of pure states

Lieven Clarisse. “On the Schmidt robustness of pure states”. Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and General39, 4239–4249 (2006)

work page 2006
[62]

Re- duction criterion of separability and limits for a class of protocols of entanglement dis- tillation

MichalHorodeckiandPawelHorodecki. “Re- duction criterion of separability and limits for a class of protocols of entanglement dis- tillation” (1997). Version Number: 3

work page 1997
[63]

Positive reduction from spectra

M.A. Jivulescu, N. Lupa, I. Nechita, and D. Reeb. “Positive reduction from spectra”. Linear Algebra and its Applications469, 276–304 (2015)

work page 2015
[64]

Afamilyofindecompos- able positive linear maps based on entangled quantum states

BarbaraM.Terhal. “Afamilyofindecompos- able positive linear maps based on entangled quantum states”. Linear Algebra and its Ap- plications323, 61–73 (2001)

work page 2001
[65]

Characterization of separable states and entanglement witnesses

M. Lewenstein, B. Kraus, P. Horodecki, and J. I. Cirac. “Characterization of separable states and entanglement witnesses”. Physical Review A63, 044304 (2001)

work page 2001
[66]

Spectral properties of en- tanglement witnesses

G Sarbicki. “Spectral properties of en- tanglement witnesses”. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical41, 375303 (2008)

work page 2008
[67]

Spec- 15 tralconditionsforpositivemaps

D. Chruscinski and A. Kossakowski. “Spec- 15 tralconditionsforpositivemaps”. Communi- cations in Mathematical Physics290, 1051– 1064 (2009)

work page 2009
[68]

SpectralPropertiesof Symmetric Quantum States and Symmetric Entanglement Witnesses

G. Champagne, N. Johnston, M. MacDon- ald, andLoganPipes. “SpectralPropertiesof Symmetric Quantum States and Symmetric Entanglement Witnesses”. Linear Algebra and its Applications649, 273–300 (2022)

work page 2022
[69]

The Inverse Eigenvalue Problem for Entanglement Wit- nesses

N. Johnston and E. Patterson. “The Inverse Eigenvalue Problem for Entanglement Wit- nesses”. Linear Algebra and its Applications 550, 1–27 (2018)

work page 2018
[70]

Spec- tral characterizations of entanglement wit- nesses

Zhiwei Song and Lin Chen. “Spec- tral characterizations of entanglement wit- nesses” (2025). arXiv:2508.11308 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[71]

Simple sufficient criteria for optimal- ity of entanglement witnesses

Frederik vom Ende and Simon Cichy. “Simple sufficient criteria for optimal- ity of entanglement witnesses” (2025). arXiv:2505.15615

work page arXiv 2025
[72]

Certifying quantum resources in many-body systems from accessible observables

Guillem-Jacob Müller Rigat. “Certifying quantum resources in many-body systems from accessible observables”. PhD the- sis. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. (2025)

work page 2025
[73]

Negative eigenvalues of partial transposition of arbitrary bipartite states

S. Rana. “Negative eigenvalues of partial transposition of arbitrary bipartite states”. Physical Review A87, 054301 (2013)

work page 2013
[74]

Bound Entanglement Can Be Activated

P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki. “Bound Entanglement Can Be Activated”. Physical Review Letters 82, 1056–1059 (1999)

work page 1999
[75]

Detecting quantum en- tanglement

Barbara M. Terhal. “Detecting quantum en- tanglement”. Theoretical Computer Science 287, 313–335 (2002)

work page 2002
[76]

Symmetry-resolved entanglement detection using partial trans- pose moments

Antoine Neven, Jose Carrasco, Vittorio Vi- tale, Christian Kokail, Andreas Elben, Mar- cello Dalmonte, Pasquale Calabrese, Peter Zoller, Benoît Vermersch, Richard Kueng, and Barbara Kraus. “Symmetry-resolved entanglement detection using partial trans- pose moments”. npj Quantum Informa- tion7(2021). A Negativity of the reduction map In this section we ext...

work page 2021
[77]

Eacha 2 i appears with multiplicitymi·M−1

work page
[78]

There areqsimple eigenvaluesη 1 >···> ηq, defined as theqreal solutions ofFx(y) = 0, where Fx(y) := 1−1 χ q∑ i=1 mib2 i b2 i−y.(55)

work page
[79]

The values interlace according to b2 1>η1>b 2 2>η2>···>b2 q >ηq,(56) where the smallest one satisfies ηq = 1−1 χ− q−1∑ i=1 ηi− q∑ i=1 (mi−1)·b2 i.(57)

work page
[80]

The null eigenvalue has multiplicity(N−r)· M

work page

Showing first 80 references.