arxiv: 2604.02439 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-02 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Absolute Schmidt number: characterization, detection and resource-theoretic quantification

Bivas Mallick , Saheli Mukherjee , Nirman Ganguly , A. S. Majumdar

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 20:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords Schmidt numberabsolute Schmidt numberquantum entanglemententanglement witnessesresource theoryquantum channelscovariant channels

0 comments

The pith

The paper introduces absolute Schmidt number states whose entanglement dimensionality cannot be increased by any global unitary transformation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The Schmidt number quantifies the effective number of entangled dimensions in a quantum state. The authors define absolute Schmidt number states as those for which this value remains unchanged under every possible global unitary applied to the full system. They give a full characterization of such states in arbitrary dimensions. Detection methods based on witnesses and moments identify the complementary class of states whose Schmidt number can be raised by a suitable unitary. Two resource measures are constructed for the non-absolute class, one of which is shown to be useful for distinguishing channels.

Core claim

States exist whose Schmidt number is invariant under the full group of global unitaries; this invariance defines the absolute Schmidt number. The set of such states is characterized, witnesses and moment conditions detect states outside the set, and two monotones quantify the resource of non-absoluteness, with the robustness monotone providing an operational advantage in channel discrimination. The same invariance property is extended to a subclass of covariant quantum channels via a necessary and sufficient condition.

What carries the argument

The absolute Schmidt number, the property that a state's Schmidt number is invariant under every global unitary on the composite system.

If this is right

States fall into two classes: those with fixed Schmidt number under all global unitaries and those whose Schmidt number can be raised by a suitable unitary.
Witness operators and moment conditions detect the second class operationally.
Resource measures based on witnesses and robustness quantify how far a state lies from the absolute class.
The robustness measure yields an advantage in a channel discrimination task.
A necessary and sufficient condition identifies covariant channels that themselves possess the absolute Schmidt number property.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Preprocessing a non-absolute state with a global unitary before an entanglement protocol could increase the effective dimension available for that protocol.
The distinction between absolute and non-absolute Schmidt number may parallel other resource theories in which global operations alter an effective rank or dimension.
The channel characterization could be used to design or select channels whose entanglement dimension remains stable under unitary noise.

Load-bearing premise

Global unitaries are capable of increasing the Schmidt number for some states, and the witness and moment tests correctly flag this possibility without false positives or negatives.

What would settle it

An explicit low-dimensional state for which a proposed witness declares the Schmidt number non-absolute, yet exhaustive search over global unitaries shows no increase occurs.

read the original abstract

The dimensionality of entanglement, quantified by the Schmidt number, is a valuable resource for a wide range of quantum information processing tasks. In this work, we introduce the notion of the absolute Schmidt number, referring to states whose Schmidt number cannot be increased by any global unitary transformation. We provide a characterization of the set of arbitrary-dimensional states whose Schmidt number is invariant under all global unitaries. Our approach enables us to develop both witness-based and moment-based techniques to detect nonabsolute Schmidt number states which could provide significant operational advantages through Schmidt number enhancement by global unitaries. We next formulate two resource-theoretic measures of nonabsolute Schmidt number states, based respectively on Schmidt number witness and robustness, and demonstrate an operational utility of the latter in a channel discrimination task. Finally, we extend our analysis to quantum channels by introducing a new class of channels that possess the absolute Schmidt number property. We derive a necessary and sufficient condition for identifying when a channel has the absolute Schmidt number property, confining our analysis to the class of covariant channels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper defines absolute Schmidt number for states fixed under global unitaries and gives detection plus resource tools, but the moment method's completeness in d>2 is not fully settled.

read the letter

The core contribution is a definition of absolute Schmidt number: states whose entanglement dimension cannot be raised by any global unitary. They characterize the invariant states in arbitrary dimension, then build witness and moment-based detectors for the non-absolute cases that can be boosted. They also turn the non-absolute property into two resource measures and show one of them helps in a channel discrimination task. Finally they define a class of channels with the absolute property and give a necessary-and-sufficient condition restricted to covariant channels. The characterization itself and the witness construction look like clean additions to the existing Schmidt-number toolkit. The channel-discrimination example supplies a concrete operational use that is not just formal. The moment technique is presented with qubit examples and low-order calculations, which is a reasonable starting point. The main soft spot is whether those moments separate the relevant convex sets completely once dimension exceeds two. The stress-test note flags that a state in d=3 could in principle increase its Schmidt number under some unitary while leaving the low-order moments unchanged; if that happens the detection claim is incomplete. Without an explicit proof that higher moments are unnecessary or a search for counterexamples, that part stays provisional. The paper stays inside the standard Schmidt-number framework rather than breaking new ground outside it, but the absolute/invariant distinction is a useful refinement for anyone who needs to control dimensionality under unitary freedom. Readers working on entanglement resources or covariant channels would find the operational parts worth checking. It is worth sending to a serious referee so the moment completeness and the channel condition can be verified in detail.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the absolute Schmidt number, defined as the Schmidt number of states that cannot be increased by any global unitary transformation. It characterizes the set of arbitrary-dimensional states whose Schmidt number is invariant under all global unitaries, develops witness-based and moment-based detection methods for non-absolute states, formulates two resource-theoretic measures (one based on Schmidt number witnesses and one on robustness), demonstrates the operational utility of the robustness measure in a channel discrimination task, and extends the framework to quantum channels by introducing channels with the absolute Schmidt number property and deriving a necessary and sufficient condition for covariant channels.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this work meaningfully advances the resource theory of entanglement dimensionality by identifying states where global unitaries provide no enhancement to Schmidt number and by supplying practical detection tools plus quantifiers with demonstrated operational value. The explicit characterization in arbitrary dimensions, the witness constructions, and the channel extension represent clear strengths; the moment-based approach and robustness measure add potential for applications in quantum information processing.

major comments (2)

[Detection techniques] Moment-based detection (around the detection techniques): the completeness claim for arbitrary dimensions d>2 is load-bearing for the detection results but rests on low-order moments of reduced operators separating the convex sets of absolute and non-absolute states. The manuscript shows the method works for qubits with examples, yet provides no general proof that higher moments or potential counterexamples in d=3 are ruled out; if a state exists whose Schmidt number increases under some unitary but whose low-order moments are unchanged, the detection guarantee fails.
[Channel analysis] Channel extension (final section): the necessary and sufficient condition is derived only for covariant channels, which is explicitly noted but limits the generality of the absolute Schmidt number property for channels; the manuscript should state whether non-covariant channels are outside scope or require separate analysis, as this affects the breadth of the channel results.

minor comments (2)

[Notation and presentation] Ensure consistent notation for Schmidt number and reduced operators across sections; a brief table summarizing the witness and moment conditions would improve readability.
[Abstract] The abstract states the characterization applies to arbitrary dimensions while the channel part is confined to covariant channels; align the summary sentence to reflect this scope precisely.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Detection techniques] Moment-based detection (around the detection techniques): the completeness claim for arbitrary dimensions d>2 is load-bearing for the detection results but rests on low-order moments of reduced operators separating the convex sets of absolute and non-absolute states. The manuscript shows the method works for qubits with examples, yet provides no general proof that higher moments or potential counterexamples in d=3 are ruled out; if a state exists whose Schmidt number increases under some unitary but whose low-order moments are unchanged, the detection guarantee fails.

Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this important point on the generality of the moment-based detection. The manuscript develops the moment-based technique in a dimension-independent framework based on the convexity of the sets of absolute and non-absolute Schmidt number states, with explicit constructions and numerical examples provided for qubits. While the low-order moments are shown to suffice in these cases, we acknowledge that a complete general proof ruling out counterexamples for all d>2 (including d=3) is not supplied. In the revised manuscript we will add a clarifying paragraph in the detection section stating that the method is rigorously verified for d=2 and conjectured to extend via the same convexity arguments, while noting that a full proof for arbitrary d remains an open question for future work. revision: partial
Referee: [Channel analysis] Channel extension (final section): the necessary and sufficient condition is derived only for covariant channels, which is explicitly noted but limits the generality of the absolute Schmidt number property for channels; the manuscript should state whether non-covariant channels are outside scope or require separate analysis, as this affects the breadth of the channel results.

Authors: We agree that the channel results are restricted to covariant channels, as already stated in the abstract and the final section where we derive the necessary and sufficient condition. Non-covariant channels lie outside the scope of the present analysis and would require an independent treatment. We will revise the manuscript to make this limitation more prominent by adding an explicit sentence in the conclusions section clarifying that the absolute Schmidt number property for general (non-covariant) channels is left for future investigation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new definitions and characterizations are independent of fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper defines the absolute Schmidt number as states invariant under global unitaries and derives its characterization, witnesses, and moment-based detectors directly from standard properties of Schmidt decomposition and reduced density operators. No equation reduces a claimed prediction or measure back to a parameter fitted from the target data itself, and the text contains no load-bearing self-citations that substitute for independent justification. The moment technique is constructed from explicit low-order moments of post-unitary reduced states, which is a forward derivation rather than a renaming or self-referential fit. The resource measures and channel extension follow similarly from the new definitions without circular closure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full text would be required to audit any implicit assumptions about Hilbert-space dimensions or unitary groups.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1068 out tokens · 31079 ms · 2026-05-13T20:53:15.758626+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages

[1]

Hence, we conclude that SN(ρ2) =2 for p> 2

work page
[2]

Consequently, this implies that Tr U † 1 W1U1ρ1 <0wheneverp> 2 5, which further indicates thatρ 1 /∈1-ABSN. Next, consider the action of a global unitary operator defined by U2 =   1√ 3 + 1√ 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0− 1√ 3 + 1√ 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 − 1 2 √ 3 + 1√ 6 0 0 0 1√ 2 0 0 0 1 2 √ 3 + 1√ 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ...

work page
[3]

Therefore we can surely conclude that SN(ρ3) =3 for p> 5

work page
[4]

This implies that ρ3 /∈2-ABSN andU † 2 W2 U2 certify this. It is worth mentioning that witness-based methods are experimentally feasible, mainly because a witness can be decomposed into a collection of local observables [46, 69–74], and such decompositions typically require only Pauli measurements. Therefore, the witness-based approach provides an experim...

work page
[5]

Examples: We now present examples illustrating the utility of the above Theorem 5. Example 3.Consider the qutrit state defined as ρ1 =p ϕ+ 1 ϕ+ 1 + 1−p 9 I9,(41) where ϕ+ 1 = |00⟩ ∈C 3 ⊗C 3 andp∈[0, 1] Consider the action of a global unitary operator defined in Eq.(20). Applying our criterion from Theorem 5 with the choice ΛR =Λ r for k=1 , where Λr is de...

work page
[6]

non-absoluteness

This violation clearly indicates that Theorem 5 is capable of certifying that ρ2 /∈2-ABSNwheneverp> 5 8. 12 IV. QUANTIFICATION OF NON-r-ABSOLUTE SCHMIDT NUMBER Having emphasized the properties and detection of states not belonging to r-ABSN, the usefulness of such states calls for a resource-theoretic quantification. Here we propose a framework for the qu...

work page
[7]

Application in channel discrimination task Remark 1.The generalized r-absolute Schmidt robustness has an operational interpretation in terms of the quantitative advantage offered by a non- r-absolute Schmidt number state over all r-absolute Schmidt number states in a suitably chosen channel discrimination task. To illustrate this connection, consider the ...

work page
[8]

The optimal witness is given by W=I 9 −3 |ϕ+⟩ ⟨ϕ+|. The value of the witness-based measure for these choices of unitary and witness operators then reduces to MW (ρ1) =max ( 0,−min {αi}6 i=0 Tr U † W Uρ 1 ) =max 0,− (2−5p) 3 =max 0, (5p−2) 3 From the above expression, it can be clearly seen that MW (ρ1) =    0,p≤ 2 5 , 5p−2 3 ,p> 2 5 . This shows that...

work page
[9]

Horodecki, P

R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Reviews of modern physics81, 865 (2009)

work page 2009
[10]

Einstein, B

A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Physical review47, 777 (1935)

work page 1935
[11]

C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Communication via one- and two-particle operators on einstein-podolsky-rosen states, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2881 (1992)

work page 1992
[12]

C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky-rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 1895 (1993)

work page 1993
[13]

S. Hao, H. Shi, W. Li, J. H. Shapiro, Q. Zhuang, and Z. Zhang, Entanglement-assisted communication surpassing the ultimate classical capacity, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 250501 (2021)

work page 2021
[14]

Piveteau, J

A. Piveteau, J. Pauwels, E. Håkansson, S. Muhammad, M. Bourennane, and A. Tavakoli, Entanglement-assisted quantum communication with simple measurements, Nature communications13, 7878 (2022)

work page 2022
[15]

L. H. Wolff, P. Belzig, M. Christandl, B. Durhuus, and M. Tomamichel, Fundamental limit on the power of entanglement assistance in quantum communication, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 020802 (2025)

work page 2025
[16]

A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on bell’s theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 661 (1991)

work page 1991
[17]

Lo and H

H.-K. Lo and H. F. Chau, Unconditional security of quantum key distribution over arbitrarily long distances, science283, 2050 (1999)

work page 2050
[18]

Yin, Y.-H

J. Yin, Y.-H. Li, S.-K. Liao, M. Yang, Y. Cao, L. Zhang, J.-G. Ren, W.-Q. Cai, W.-Y. Liu, S.-L. Li,et al., Entanglement- based secure quantum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres, Nature582, 501 (2020)

work page 2020
[19]

Jozsa and N

R. Jozsa and N. Linden, On the role of entanglement in quantum-computational speed-up, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences459, 2011 (2003)

work page 2011
[20]

J. D. Biamonte, M. E. S. Morales, and D. E. Koh, Entanglement scaling in quantum advantage benchmarks, Phys. Rev. A101, 012349 (2020)

work page 2020
[21]

Pironio, A

S. Pironio, A. Acín, S. Massar, A. B. de La Giroday, D. N. Matsukevich, P. Maunz, S. Olmschenk, D. Hayes, L. Luo, T. A. Manning,et al., Random numbers certified by bell’s theorem, Nature464, 1021 (2010)

work page 2010
[22]

Y. Liu, X. Yuan, M.-H. Li, W. Zhang, Q. Zhao, J. Zhong, Y. Cao, Y.-H. Li, L.-K. Chen, H. Li, T. Peng, Y.-A. Chen, C.-Z. Peng, S.-C. Shi, Z. Wang, L. You, X. Ma, J. Fan, Q. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, High-speed device-independent 23 quantum random number generation without a detection loophole, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 010503 (2018)

work page 2018
[23]

Chitambar and G

E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Reviews of modern physics91, 025001 (2019)

work page 2019
[24]

Thirring, R

W. Thirring, R. A. Bertlmann, P. Köhler, and H. Narnhofer, Entanglement or separability: The choice of how to factorize the algebra of a density matrix, The European Physical Journal D64, 181 (2011)

work page 2011
[25]

Z. Guan, H. He, Y.-J. Han, C.-F. Li, F. Galve, and G.-C. Guo, Entangling power of two-qubit gates on mixed states, Physical Review A89, 012324 (2014)

work page 2014
[26]

Ishizaka and T

S. Ishizaka and T. Hiroshima, Maximally entangled mixed states under nonlocal unitary operations in two qubits, Physical Review A62, 022310 (2000)

work page 2000
[27]

C. A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, B. E. King, C. Langer, V. Meyer, C. J. Myatt, M. Rowe, Q. A. Turchette, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland,et al., Experimental entanglement of four particles, Nature404, 256 (2000)

work page 2000
[28]

Rauschenbeutel, G

A. Rauschenbeutel, G. Nogues, S. Osnaghi, P. Bertet, M. Brune, J.-M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Step-by-step engineered multiparticle entanglement, Science288, 2024 (2000)

work page 2024
[29]

Kraus and J

B. Kraus and J. I. Cirac, Optimal creation of entanglement using a two-qubit gate, Physical Review A63, 062309 (2001)

work page 2001
[30]

M. J. Kastoryano, F. Reiter, and A. S. Sørensen, Dissipative preparation of entanglement in optical cavities, Physical review letters106, 090502 (2011)

work page 2011
[31]

Johnston, Separability from spectrum for qubit-qudit states, Phys

N. Johnston, Separability from spectrum for qubit-qudit states, Phys. Rev. A88, 062330 (2013)

work page 2013
[32]

Kuś and K

M. Kuś and K. Życzkowski, Geometry of entangled states, Phys. Rev. A63, 032307 (2001)

work page 2001
[33]

Ganguly, J

N. Ganguly, J. Chatterjee, and A. Majumdar, Witness of mixed separable states useful for entanglement creation, Physical Review A89, 052304 (2014)

work page 2014
[34]

Serrano-Ensástiga, J

E. Serrano-Ensástiga, J. Denis, and J. Martin, Absolute-separability witnesses for symmetric multiqubit states, Physical Review A109, 022430 (2024)

work page 2024
[35]

Louvet, E

J. Louvet, E. Serrano-Ensástiga, T. Bastin, and J. Martin, Nonequivalence between absolute separability and positive partial transposition in the symmetric subspace, Physical Review A111, 042418 (2025)

work page 2025
[36]

Arunachalam, N

S. Arunachalam, N. Johnston, and V. Russo, Is absolute separability determined by the partial transpose?, arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.5853 (2014)

work page arXiv 2014
[37]

Życzkowski, P

K. Życzkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, Volume of the set of separable states, Phys. Rev. A58, 883 (1998)

work page 1998
[38]

Abellanet-Vidal, G

J. Abellanet-Vidal, G. Müller-Rigat, G. Rajchel-Mieldzioć, and A. Sanpera, Sufficient criteria for absolute separ- ability in arbitrary dimensions via linear map inverses, Reports on Progress in Physics88, 107601 (2025)

work page 2025
[39]

Patra, S

A. Patra, S. Mal, and A. Sen, Efficient nonlinear witnessing of non–absolutely separable states with lossy detectors, Physical Review A104, 032427 (2021)

work page 2021
[40]

Halder, S

S. Halder, S. Mal, and A. Sen(De), Characterizing the boundary of the set of absolutely separable states and their generation via noisy environments, Phys. Rev. A103, 052431 (2021)

work page 2021
[41]

B. M. Terhal and P. Horodecki, Schmidt number for density matrices, Physical Review A61, 040301 (2000)

work page 2000
[42]

S. Liu, Q. He, M. Huber, O. Gühne, and G. Vitagliano, Characterizing entanglement dimensionality from randomized measurements, PRX Quantum4, 020324 (2023)

work page 2023
[43]

S. Liu, M. Fadel, Q. He, M. Huber, and G. Vitagliano, Bounding entanglement dimensionality from the covariance matrix, Quantum8, 1236 (2024)

work page 2024
[44]

Krebs and M

R. Krebs and M. Gachechiladze, High schmidt number concentration in quantum bound entangled states, Physical Review Letters132, 220203 (2024)

work page 2024
[45]

Zhang, S

C. Zhang, S. Denker, A. Asadian, and O. Gühne, Analyzing quantum entanglement with the schmidt decomposi- tion in operator space, Physical Review Letters133, 040203 (2024)

work page 2024
[46]

Mukherjee, B

S. Mukherjee, B. Mallick, A. K. Das, A. Kundu, and P. Ghosal, Measurement-device-independent certification of schmidt number, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13296 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[47]

Mukherjee, B

S. Mukherjee, B. Mallick, and P. Ghosal, Certifying the dimensionality of any quantum channel with minimal assumptions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.10758 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

Zhang, J.-L

C. Zhang, J.-L. Miao, X.-M. Hu, J. Pauwels, Y. Guo, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, A. Tavakoli, and B.-H. Liu, Quantum stochastic communication via high-dimensional entanglement, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04887 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[49]

J. Bae, D. Chruściński, and M. Piani, More entanglement implies higher performance in channel discrimination tasks, Physical Review Letters122, 140404 (2019)

work page 2019
[50]

M. Kues, C. Reimer, P. Roztocki, L. R. Cortés, S. Sciara, B. Wetzel, Y. Zhang, A. Cino, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little,et al., On-chip generation of high-dimensional entangled quantum states and their coherent control, Nature546, 622 24 (2017)

work page 2017
[51]

N. J. Cerf, M. Bourennane, A. Karlsson, and N. Gisin, Security of quantum key distribution using d-level systems, Physical review letters88, 127902 (2002)

work page 2002
[52]

R. B. Holmes,Geometric functional analysis and its applications, Vol. 24 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

work page 2012
[53]

Matsunaga and L

H. Matsunaga and L. B. Ho, Detecting and protecting entanglement through nonlocality, variational entangle- ment witness, and nonlocal measurements, Physical Review Research7, 013239 (2025)

work page 2025
[54]

Gühne and G

O. Gühne and G. Tóth, Entanglement detection, Physics Reports474, 1 (2009)

work page 2009
[55]

Gühne and N

O. Gühne and N. Lütkenhaus, Nonlinear entanglement witnesses, Physical review letters96, 170502 (2006)

work page 2006
[56]

Elben, R

A. Elben, R. Kueng, H.-Y. Huang, R. van Bijnen, C. Kokail, M. Dalmonte, P. Calabrese, B. Kraus, J. Preskill, P. Zoller,et al., Mixed-state entanglement from local randomized measurements, Physical Review Letters125, 200501 (2020)

work page 2020
[57]

X.-D. Yu, S. Imai, and O. Gühne, Optimal entanglement certification from moments of the partial transpose, Physical Review Letters127, 060504 (2021)

work page 2021
[58]

Aggarwal, S

S. Aggarwal, S. Adhikari, and A. Majumdar, Entanglement detection in arbitrary-dimensional bipartite quantum systems through partial realigned moments, Physical Review A109, 012404 (2024)

work page 2024
[59]

Mallick, S

B. Mallick, S. Mukherjee, A. G. Maity, and A. Majumdar, Assessing non-markovian dynamics through moments of the choi state, Physical Review A109, 022247 (2024)

work page 2024
[60]

Mallick, S

B. Mallick, S. Chakrabarty, S. Mukherjee, A. G. Maity, and A. Majumdar, Efficient detection of nonclassicality using moments of the wigner function, Physical Review A111, 032406 (2025)

work page 2025
[61]

Mukherjee, B

S. Mukherjee, B. Mallick, S. G. Naik, A. G. Maity, and A. Majumdar, Detecting genuine multipartite entanglement using moments of positive maps, Physical Review A112, 062428 (2025)

work page 2025
[62]

Chakrabarty, B

S. Chakrabarty, B. Mallick, S. Mukherjee, and A. G. Maity, Probing kirkwood-dirac nonpositivity and its operational implications via moments, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08107 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[63]

Mallick, A

B. Mallick, A. G. Maity, N. Ganguly, and A. Majumdar, Higher-dimensional-entanglement detection and quantum-channel characterization using moments of generalized positive maps, Physical Review A112, 012416 (2025)

work page 2025
[64]

Mallick, S

B. Mallick, S. Mukherjee, N. Ganguly, and A. Majumdar, Detection of nonabsolute separability in quantum states and channels through moments, Physical Review A113, 012433 (2026)

work page 2026
[65]

Huang, R

H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, and J. Preskill, Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measure- ments, Nature Physics16, 1050 (2020)

work page 2020
[66]

Aaronson, Shadow tomography of quantum states, inProceedings of the 50th annual ACM SIGACT symposium on theory of computing(2018) pp

S. Aaronson, Shadow tomography of quantum states, inProceedings of the 50th annual ACM SIGACT symposium on theory of computing(2018) pp. 325–338

work page 2018
[67]

Aaronson and G

S. Aaronson and G. N. Rothblum, Gentle measurement of quantum states and differential privacy, inProceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing(2019) pp. 322–333

work page 2019
[68]

Patra, A

A. Patra, A. Maity, and A. Sen, Resource theory of nonabsolute separability, Physical Review A108, 042402 (2023)

work page 2023
[69]

Abellanet-Vidal, G

J. Abellanet-Vidal, G. Müller-Rigat, A. Rico, and A. Sanpera, Bounding the entanglement of a state from its spectrum, arXiv:2604.XXXXX (2026)

work page 2026
[70]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information(Cambridge university press, 2010)

work page 2010
[71]

Bhatia,Matrix analysis, Vol

R. Bhatia,Matrix analysis, Vol. 169 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

work page 2013
[72]

M. A. Jivulescu, N. Lupa, I. Nechita, and D. Reeb, Positive reduction from spectra, Linear Algebra and its Applications469, 276 (2015)

work page 2015
[73]

Sanpera, D

A. Sanpera, D. Bruß, and M. Lewenstein, Schmidt-number witnesses and bound entanglement, Physical Review A63, 050301 (2001)

work page 2001
[74]

Y. Yang, D. H. Leung, and W.-S. Tang, All 2-positive linear maps from m3 (c) to m3 (c) are decomposable, Linear Algebra and its Applications503, 233 (2016)

work page 2016
[75]

M. L. Mehta, Matrix theory: Selected topics and useful results, (No Title) (1989)

work page 1989
[76]

Gurvits and H

L. Gurvits and H. Barnum, Largest separable balls around the maximally mixed bipartite quantum state, Physical Review A66, 062311 (2002)

work page 2002
[77]

Gühne and P

O. Gühne and P. Hyllus, Investigating three qubit entanglement with local measurements, International Journal of Theoretical Physics42, 1001 (2003). 25

work page 2003
[78]

Horodecki, P

R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 865 (2009)

work page 2009
[79]

Bourennane, M

M. Bourennane, M. Eibl, C. Kurtsiefer, S. Gaertner, H. Weinfurter, O. Gühne, P. Hyllus, D. Bruß, M. Lewenstein, and A. Sanpera, Experimental detection of multipartite entanglement using witness operators, Physical review letters92, 087902 (2004)

work page 2004
[80]

Gühne, P

O. Gühne, P. Hyllus, D. Bruß, A. Ekert, M. Lewenstein, C. Macchiavello, and A. Sanpera, Detection of entangle- ment with few local measurements, Physical Review A66, 062305 (2002)

work page 2002

Showing first 80 references.