pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04437 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Quantum Clock Synchronization Networks: A Survey

Uman Khalid , Muhammad Shohibul Ulum , Mujirin , Giuseppe Thadeu Freitas de Abreu , Emil Bj\"ornson , Hyundong Shin
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 20:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum clock synchronizationentanglement-assisted time transferHong-Ou-Mandel interferencequantum networksquantum internettime synchronization protocolsquantum frequency combs
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum clock synchronization protocols can surpass classical precision and security bounds using entanglement and quantum correlations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This survey reviews quantum clock synchronization techniques that use entanglement, interference, and quantum correlations to establish shared time references between distant nodes. Classical methods are limited by propagation delays, atmospheric effects, and drift, while QCS aims to exceed those limits and resist adversarial interference. A sympathetic reader cares because accurate, secure timing underpins distributed quantum networks, navigation, and the emerging quantum internet. The paper organizes protocol families, quantum resources, performance issues, and implementation challenges to clarify relationships and potential advantages.

Core claim

Quantum clock synchronization establishes a shared temporal reference between distant nodes by exploiting uniquely quantum phenomena such as entanglement, single-photon interference, and quantum correlations, offering the potential to surpass classical precision bounds and enhance resilience against adversarial manipulations.

What carries the argument

Entanglement-assisted time transfer and Hong-Ou-Mandel interference-based synchronization, which harness quantum correlations to reduce timing uncertainties beyond classical signal-propagation limits.

If this is right

  • Distributed quantum networks gain tighter timing references that support higher-fidelity entanglement distribution.
  • Navigation and positioning systems obtain enhanced resistance to spoofing and jamming through quantum correlations.
  • Protocol families such as ticking-qubit and conveyor-belt schemes become selectable based on required precision versus resource cost.
  • Security analyses show that multipartite entangled states can detect and mitigate certain classes of adversarial timing manipulation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Scaling these protocols will likely hinge on advances in quantum memory coherence times that the survey flags as a constraint.
  • The organization of protocol types suggests natural extensions to hybrid classical-quantum synchronization layers for near-term networks.
  • Performance comparisons in the survey point to laboratory tests that could quantify precision gains using spontaneous parametric down-conversion sources.

Load-bearing premise

That the reviewed quantum resources such as entangled photon pairs, quantum memories, and frequency combs can be implemented reliably at network scales with current or near-future technology.

What would settle it

A multi-node experiment that demonstrates QCS achieving measurably lower timing variance than classical two-way time transfer under identical channel noise and attack conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04437 by Emil Bj\"ornson, Giuseppe Thadeu Freitas de Abreu, Hyundong Shin, Muhammad Shohibul Ulum, Mujirin, Uman Khalid.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Evolution of QCS research, jointly illustrating scientific influence and deployment practicality from classical atomic clocks to QCS networks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Bloch-sphere representation of the QCS protocol using a two-level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: If the photons are identical in all degrees of freedom— [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: HOM interferometer. Two photons impinge on a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of Einstein and Eddington synchronization methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of the TQH-QCS protocol. A single qubit is exchanged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration of the conveyor-belt QCS protocol. The entanglement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of the HOM-QCS protocol. Entangled photons from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Illustration of the quantum-enhanced two-way time-transfer protocol. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Illustration of the quantum teleportation setup. An entangled photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum clock synchronization (QCS) aims to establish a shared temporal reference between distant nodes by exploiting uniquely quantum phenomena such as entanglement, single-photon interference, and quantum correlations. In contrast to classical synchronization and time-transfer techniques, which are limited by signal propagation delays, atmospheric disturbances, and oscillator drift, QCS protocols offer the potential to surpass classical precision bounds and enhance resilience against adversarial manipulations. As precise and secure time synchronization underpins distributed quantum networks, navigation systems, and emerging quantum Internet infrastructures, understanding QCS principles, capabilities, and implementation challenges has become increasingly important. This survey provides a unified and critical overview of the rapidly growing QCS research landscape, highlighting fundamentals, protocol types, enabling resources, performance constraints, security considerations, and practical implementations of QCS. We first introduce the theoretical underpinnings of QCS, including entanglement-assisted time transfer, Hong-Ou-Mandel interference-based synchronization, and quantum slow-clock transport. We then categorize the main QCS protocols, ranging from ticking-qubit and entanglement-based schemes to time-of-arrival correlation methods, conveyor-belt synchronization, and quantum-enhanced two-way time transfer. This organization clarifies the relationships between protocol families and their achievable precision advantages over classical methods. Key quantum resources such as spontaneous parametric down-conversion-based entangled photon pairs, Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger and W multipartite states, squeezed and frequency-entangled light, quantum frequency combs, and quantum memories are reviewed in the context of scalability and robustness.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This survey provides a unified overview of quantum clock synchronization (QCS) networks. It introduces theoretical foundations including entanglement-assisted time transfer, Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, and quantum slow-clock transport; categorizes protocol families such as ticking-qubit schemes, entanglement-based methods, time-of-arrival correlations, conveyor-belt synchronization, and quantum-enhanced two-way time transfer; reviews enabling resources including SPDC photon pairs, GHZ/W states, squeezed light, quantum frequency combs, and quantum memories; and addresses performance constraints, security against adversarial attacks, and practical implementation challenges. The central claim is that QCS protocols can potentially exceed classical precision limits and offer improved resilience for distributed quantum networks and the quantum Internet.

Significance. If the literature representations are accurate and complete, the survey offers a timely, structured reference that organizes disparate QCS approaches and explicitly links them to scalability and security issues. This is valuable for researchers developing quantum networks, as it consolidates fundamentals with practical constraints without introducing new derivations or claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [protocol categorization] In the protocol categorization section, the claim that the organization 'clarifies the relationships between protocol families and their achievable precision advantages over classical methods' is not supported by any cross-protocol quantitative comparison (e.g., scaling of synchronization precision with distance or node number); the advantages remain stated qualitatively despite the survey's emphasis on surpassing classical bounds.
  2. [quantum resources review] In the quantum resources review, the discussion of scalability and robustness for resources such as GHZ states and quantum memories does not include concrete estimates of how decoherence or loss affects synchronization fidelity over network-relevant distances; this weakens the assessment of near-term implementability that the survey itself flags as important.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract lists protocol families but does not indicate how many distinct protocols or key references are covered in total; adding this would help readers gauge the survey's scope.
  2. [fundamentals] Notation for quantum states (e.g., GHZ vs. W) is introduced without a brief reminder of their explicit forms or entanglement properties in the fundamentals section, which could aid readers new to the subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the recommendation of minor revision. The comments identify opportunities to make the survey's discussion of protocol relationships and practical constraints more explicit. We address each major comment below and outline targeted revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: In the protocol categorization section, the claim that the organization 'clarifies the relationships between protocol families and their achievable precision advantages over classical methods' is not supported by any cross-protocol quantitative comparison (e.g., scaling of synchronization precision with distance or node number); the advantages remain stated qualitatively despite the survey's emphasis on surpassing classical bounds.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation. As a survey, the manuscript organizes existing protocol families according to their underlying mechanisms and quantum resources, drawing on the precision advantages reported in the original literature. No new cross-protocol quantitative analysis or scaling derivations are performed. We agree that an explicit compilation of quantitative metrics would strengthen the claim. In the revision we will insert a summary table that collects reported precision scalings, distance dependencies, and comparisons to classical limits from representative papers in each category. This addition will make the relationships more concrete while preserving the survey character of the work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: In the quantum resources review, the discussion of scalability and robustness for resources such as GHZ states and quantum memories does not include concrete estimates of how decoherence or loss affects synchronization fidelity over network-relevant distances; this weakens the assessment of near-term implementability that the survey itself flags as important.

    Authors: We concur that concrete estimates would improve the assessment of near-term feasibility. The current text reviews general scalability and robustness considerations for GHZ states, quantum memories, and related resources as discussed in the literature, but does not extract or tabulate specific fidelity impacts under decoherence and loss at distances typical of quantum networks. In the revised manuscript we will add a short subsection or table summarizing representative numerical estimates (e.g., decoherence times for multipartite states and loss tolerances for memories in fiber links of 10–100 km) drawn from key references, together with their implications for synchronization fidelity. This will directly support the survey's emphasis on practical implementation challenges. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: survey with no derivations

full rationale

This is a review paper that provides an overview of existing QCS literature, categorizing protocols and resources from external sources without any original derivations, equations, predictions, or fitted parameters defined within the paper. The abstract and structure explicitly frame the work as a survey summarizing fundamentals, protocol types, and challenges from prior work, with all content referencing external literature rather than self-contained claims that reduce to internal inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a survey paper, no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5580 in / 1151 out tokens · 55719 ms · 2026-05-10T20:21:42.729514+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Protocols for Time Synchronisation and Distribution: A Critical Assessment

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Quantum time synchronization protocols do not provide a near-term replacement for classical methods in most applications because time transfer precision remains the limiting factor, though they add value for physical-...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

234 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Quantum-enhanced positioning and clock syn- chronization,

    V . Giovannetti et al. , “Quantum-enhanced positioning and clock syn- chronization,” Nature, vol. 412, no. 6845, pp. 417–419, Jul. 2001

    2001

  2. [2]

    Optical atomic clocks,

    A. D. Ludlow et al., “Optical atomic clocks,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 637–701, Jun. 2015

    2015

  3. [3]

    Optical coherence and teleportation: Why a laser is a clock and not a quantum channel,

    H. M. Wiseman, “Optical coherence and teleportation: Why a laser is a clock and not a quantum channel,” in Fluctuations and Noise in Photonics and Quantum Optics , vol. 5111, May 2003, pp. 78–91

    2003

  4. [4]

    The quantum Allan variance,

    K. Chabuda et al., “The quantum Allan variance,”New J. Phys., vol. 18, no. 8, p. 083035, Aug. 2016

    2016

  5. [5]

    Exponential scaling of clock stability with atom number,

    T. Rosenband et al., “Exponential scaling of clock stability with atom number,” arXiv:1303.6357, Mar. 2013

    work page arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    Zur elektrodynamik bewegter k ¨orper,

    A. Einstein, “Zur elektrodynamik bewegter k ¨orper,” Ann. Phys. , vol. 322, no. 10, pp. 891–921, 1905

    1905

  7. [7]

    Efficient atomic clocks operated with several atomic ensembles,

    J. Borregaard et al. , “Efficient atomic clocks operated with several atomic ensembles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 111, no. 9, p. 090802, Aug. 2013

    2013

  8. [8]

    Noise and instability of an optical lattice clock,

    A. A. Masoudi et al., “Noise and instability of an optical lattice clock,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 92, no. 6, p. 063814, Dec. 2015

    2015

  9. [9]

    On the synchronization of clocks,

    M. Pitk ¨anen, “On the synchronization of clocks,” Prespacetime Jour- nal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 377–380, Mar. 2017

    2017

  10. [10]

    Optical clock networks,

    F. Riehle, “Optical clock networks,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 25–31, Jan. 2017

    2017

  11. [11]

    Quantum clock synchronization with a single qudit,

    A. Tavakoli et al., “Quantum clock synchronization with a single qudit,” Sci. Rep., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 7982, Jan. 2015

    2015

  12. [12]

    Application of quantum-limited optical time transfer to space-based optical clock comparisons and coherent net- works,

    E. D. Caldwell et al. , “Application of quantum-limited optical time transfer to space-based optical clock comparisons and coherent net- works,” APL Photonics, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 016112, Jan. 2024

    2024

  13. [13]

    Synchronization of distant optical clocks at the femtosecond level,

    J.-D. Deschenes et al., “Synchronization of distant optical clocks at the femtosecond level,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 021016, May 2016

    2016

  14. [14]

    Review of clock synchronization in quantum communications,

    N. S. Azahari et al. , “Review of clock synchronization in quantum communications,” in Proc. 13th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications , Feb. 2024, p. 350–356

    2024

  15. [15]

    Simultaneous remote transfer of accurate timing and optical frequency over a public fiber network,

    O. Lopez et al., “Simultaneous remote transfer of accurate timing and optical frequency over a public fiber network,” Appl. Phys. B, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 3–6, Jan. 2013

    2013

  16. [16]

    Remote atomic clock synchronization via satellites and optical fibers,

    D. Piester et al. , “Remote atomic clock synchronization via satellites and optical fibers,” Adv. Radio Sci. , vol. 9, pp. 1–7, Jul. 2011

    2011

  17. [17]

    A clock network for geodesy and fundamental science,

    C. Lisdat et al. , “A clock network for geodesy and fundamental science,” Nat. Commun., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 12443, Aug. 2016

    2016

  18. [18]

    All-optical synchronization for quantum networking,

    B. Fedrici et al., “All-optical synchronization for quantum networking,” in Proc. Quantum Information and Measurement (QIM) , Apr. 2017, p. QF3B.5

    2017

  19. [19]

    Experimental verification of intersatellite clock synchronization at LISA performance levels,

    K. Yamamoto et al. , “Experimental verification of intersatellite clock synchronization at LISA performance levels,” Phys. Rev. D , vol. 105, no. 4, p. 042009, Feb. 2022

    2022

  20. [20]

    Quantum clocks and their synchronisation-the alternate ticks game,

    S. Rankovi ´c et al. , “Quantum clocks and their synchronisation-the alternate ticks game,” arXiv:1506.01373, Jun. 2015

    work page arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    Teleportation transfers only speakable quantum information,

    G. Chiribella et al. , “Teleportation transfers only speakable quantum information,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 86, no. 1, p. 010304, Jul. 2012

    2012

  22. [22]

    Quantum stopwatch: how to store time in a quantum memory,

    Y . Yang et al., “Quantum stopwatch: how to store time in a quantum memory,” Proc. Royal Soc. A , vol. 474, no. 2213, p. 20170773, May 2018

    2018

  23. [23]

    Enhanced quantum synchronization via quantum machine learning,

    F. A. C ´ardenas-L´opez et al., “Enhanced quantum synchronization via quantum machine learning,” Adv. Quantum Technol., vol. 2, no. 7-8, p. 1800076, Jan. 2019

    2019

  24. [24]

    Criterion of quantum phase synchronization in continuous variable systems by local measurement,

    S.-Q. Ma et al. , “Criterion of quantum phase synchronization in continuous variable systems by local measurement,” Quantum Inf. Process., vol. 19, no. 3, p. 86, Jan. 2020

    2020

  25. [25]

    Frequency synchronization of single flux quantum oscillators,

    Y . Yamanashiet al., “Frequency synchronization of single flux quantum oscillators,” Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 34, no. 10, p. 105004, Sep. 2021

    2021

  26. [26]

    Classical-driving-assisted quantum synchronization in non-Markovian environments,

    X. Xiao et al., “Classical-driving-assisted quantum synchronization in non-Markovian environments,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 107, no. 2, p. 022221, Feb. 2023

    2023

  27. [27]

    Improved GPS-based time link calibration involving ROA and PTB,

    H. Esteban et al., “Improved GPS-based time link calibration involving ROA and PTB,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelectr., Freq. Control , vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 714–720, Mar. 2010

    2010

  28. [28]

    Synchronization challenges in deep space com- munications,

    J. Vil `a-Valls et al. , “Synchronization challenges in deep space com- munications,” IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. , vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 16–27, Jan. 2019

    2019

  29. [29]

    Frequency comparison of two high-accuracy Al + optical clocks,

    C. W. Chou et al., “Frequency comparison of two high-accuracy Al + optical clocks,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 104, p. 070802, Feb. 2010

    2010

  30. [30]

    Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2×10−18 total uncertainty,

    T. L. Nicholson et al. , “Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2×10−18 total uncertainty,”Nat. Commun., vol. 6, p. 6896, Apr. 2015

    2015

  31. [31]

    Single-ion atomic clock with 3 ×10−18 system- atic uncertainty,

    N. Huntemann et al., “Single-ion atomic clock with 3 ×10−18 system- atic uncertainty,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 116, p. 063001, Feb. 2016

    2016

  32. [32]

    Ultra-stable optical clock with two cold-atom ensembles,

    M. Schioppo et al. , “Ultra-stable optical clock with two cold-atom ensembles,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 11, pp. 48–52, Jan. 2017

    2017

  33. [33]

    Geopotential measurements with synchronously linked optical lattice clocks,

    T. Takano et al. , “Geopotential measurements with synchronously linked optical lattice clocks,” Nat. Photonics , vol. 10, pp. 662–666, Aug. 2016

    2016

  34. [34]

    Optical clocks and relativity,

    C.-W. Chou et al. , “Optical clocks and relativity,” Science, vol. 329, no. 5999, pp. 1630–1633, Sep. 2010

    2010

  35. [35]

    Atomic clocks: new prospects in metrology and geodesy,

    P. Delva et al. , “Atomic clocks: new prospects in metrology and geodesy,” Acta Futura, vol. 7, pp. 67–78, Nov. 2013

    2013

  36. [36]

    Determination of a high spatial resolution geopotential model using atomic clock comparisons,

    G. Lion et al., “Determination of a high spatial resolution geopotential model using atomic clock comparisons,” J. Geod. , vol. 91, pp. 597– 611, Jan. 2017

    2017

  37. [37]

    Geodesy and metrology with a transportable optical clock,

    J. Grotti et al. , “Geodesy and metrology with a transportable optical clock,” Nat. Phys., vol. 14, pp. 437–441, Feb. 2018

    2018

  38. [38]

    Ground-based optical atomic clocks as a tool to monitor vertical surface motion,

    R. Bondarescu et al., “Ground-based optical atomic clocks as a tool to monitor vertical surface motion,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 202, pp. 1770– 1774, Jul. 2015

    2015

  39. [39]

    Gravitational wave detection with optical lattice atomic clocks,

    S. Kolkowitz et al., “Gravitational wave detection with optical lattice atomic clocks,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 94, p. 124043, Dec. 2016

    2016

  40. [40]

    Test of special relativity using a fiber network of optical clocks,

    P. Delva et al. , “Test of special relativity using a fiber network of optical clocks,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 118, p. 221102, Jun. 2017

    2017

  41. [41]

    Hunting for topological dark matter with atomic clocks,

    A. Derevianko et al., “Hunting for topological dark matter with atomic clocks,” Nat. Phys., vol. 10, pp. 933–936, Nov. 2014

    2014

  42. [42]

    Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks,

    A. Arvanitaki et al. , “Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 91, p. 015015, Jan. 2015

    2015

  43. [43]

    Experimental constraint on dark matter detection with optical atomic clocks,

    P. Wcisło et al., “Experimental constraint on dark matter detection with optical atomic clocks,” Nat. Astron., vol. 1, p. 0009, Dec. 2016

    2016

  44. [44]

    Searching for an oscillating massive scalar field as a dark matter candidate using atomic hyperfine frequency comparisons,

    A. Hees et al., “Searching for an oscillating massive scalar field as a dark matter candidate using atomic hyperfine frequency comparisons,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 117, p. 061301, Aug. 2016

    2016

  45. [45]

    Search for domain wall dark matter with atomic clocks on board global positioning system satellites,

    B. M. Roberts et al., “Search for domain wall dark matter with atomic clocks on board global positioning system satellites,” Nat. Commun. , vol. 8, p. 1195, Oct. 2017

    2017

  46. [46]

    Network time protocol (version 1) specification and implementation,

    D. L. Mills, “Network time protocol (version 1) specification and implementation,” RFC 1059, Jul. 1988. [Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1059

    1988

  47. [47]

    Network time protocol (version 2) specification and implementation,

    D. L. Mills, “Network time protocol (version 2) specification and implementation,” RFC 1119, Sep. 1989. [Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1119

    1989

  48. [48]

    Network time protocol (version 3) specification, implementation and analysis,

    D. L. Mills, “Network time protocol (version 3) specification, implementation and analysis,” RFC 1305, Mar. 1992. [Online]. Available: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1305

    1992

  49. [49]

    Precise onboard real-time orbit determination with a low-cost single-frequency GPS/BDS receiver,

    X. Gong et al., “Precise onboard real-time orbit determination with a low-cost single-frequency GPS/BDS receiver,” vol. 11, no. 11, p. 1391, Jun. 2019. 36

    2019

  50. [50]

    Centimeter-level recording for all: Field experimen- tation with new, affordable geolocation technology,

    P. J. Cobb et al., “Centimeter-level recording for all: Field experimen- tation with new, affordable geolocation technology,” Adv. Archaeol. Pract., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 353–365, Aug. 2019

    2019

  51. [51]

    Quantum-assisted network time synchronisation: A literature review, considering examples and challenges,

    M. Barhoumi, “Quantum-assisted network time synchronisation: A literature review, considering examples and challenges,” Social Science Research Network, Mar. 2025

    2025

  52. [52]

    Quantum clock synchronization with the silicon-chip based entangled photon source,

    H. Han et al. , “Quantum clock synchronization with the silicon-chip based entangled photon source,” EPJ Quantum Technol., vol. 12, p. 97, Aug. 2025

    2025

  53. [53]

    Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level,

    W. F. McGrew et al. , “Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level,” Nature, vol. 564, pp. 87–90, Nov. 2018

    2018

  54. [54]

    A Fermi-degenerate three-dimensional optical lattice clock,

    S. L. Campbell et al. , “A Fermi-degenerate three-dimensional optical lattice clock,” Nature, vol. 564, pp. 87–90, 2017

    2017

  55. [55]

    Quantum-limited optical time transfer for future geosynchronous links,

    E. D. Caldwell et al., “Quantum-limited optical time transfer for future geosynchronous links,” Nature, vol. 618, no. 7966, pp. 721–726, Jun. 2023

    2023

  56. [56]

    Time synchronization in communication networks: A comparative study of quantum technologies,

    S. S. Nande et al., “Time synchronization in communication networks: A comparative study of quantum technologies,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) , Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Apr. 2024, pp. 1–6

    2024

  57. [57]

    Quantum-enhanced clock synchronization using prior statistical information,

    R. K. Gosalia et al., “Quantum-enhanced clock synchronization using prior statistical information,” Quantum Sci. Technol., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 025022, Feb. 2025

    2025

  58. [58]

    Classical and quantum frequency combs for satellite-based clock synchronization,

    R. K. Gosalia et al. , “Classical and quantum frequency combs for satellite-based clock synchronization,” APL Photonics , vol. 9, no. 10, p. 100903, Oct. 2024

    2024

  59. [59]

    Observation of quantum phase synchronization in spin-1 atoms,

    A. W. Laskar et al., “Observation of quantum phase synchronization in spin-1 atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 125, no. 1, p. 013601, Jul. 2020

    2020

  60. [60]

    Simultaneous control of quantum phase synchroniza- tion and entanglement dynamics in a gain-loss optomechanical cavity system,

    J. Ghosh et al., “Simultaneous control of quantum phase synchroniza- tion and entanglement dynamics in a gain-loss optomechanical cavity system,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 109, no. 2, p. 023512, Feb. 2024

    2024

  61. [61]

    Synchronization, quantum correlations and entan- glement in oscillator networks,

    G. Manzano et al., “Synchronization, quantum correlations and entan- glement in oscillator networks,” Sci. Rep., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 1439, Mar. 2013

    2013

  62. [62]

    Measures of quantum synchronization in continuous variable systems,

    A. Mari et al. , “Measures of quantum synchronization in continuous variable systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 111, no. 10, p. 103605, Sep. 2013

    2013

  63. [63]

    Network time synchronization as a quantum physical layer service,

    N. Nunavath et al. , “Network time synchronization as a quantum physical layer service,” in Proc. 28th European Wireless Conference , Oct. 2023, pp. 302–307

    2023

  64. [64]

    A survey on quantum positioning system,

    S. Duan et al., “A survey on quantum positioning system,”Int. J. Model Simul., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 265–283, Mar. 2021

    2021

  65. [65]

    Review of quantum navigation,

    D. Feng, “Review of quantum navigation,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 237, no. 3, Feb. 2019, p. 032027

    2019

  66. [66]

    Design and analysis of the secure scheme for quantum positioning based on entangled photon pair,

    H. Hong-Mei et al. , “Design and analysis of the secure scheme for quantum positioning based on entangled photon pair,” in Proc. 10th International Conference on P2P , Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC), Nov. 2015, pp. 849–852

    2015

  67. [67]

    A survey on non-terrestrial quantum networking: Challenges and trends,

    F. Chiti et al. , “A survey on non-terrestrial quantum networking: Challenges and trends,” Comput. Netw., vol. 252, p. 110668, Oct. 2024

    2024

  68. [68]

    Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead,

    S. Wehner et al. , “Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead,” Science, vol. 362, no. 6412, p. eaam9288, Oct. 2018

    2018

  69. [69]

    All-fiber telecom band energy-time entangled biphoton source,

    Y . Liu et al., “All-fiber telecom band energy-time entangled biphoton source,” Chin. Opt. Lett. , vol. 21, no. 11, p. 032701, Mar. 2023

    2023

  70. [70]

    Two-way quantum clock synchronization using non- degenerate quantum correlated photon pairs,

    J. Guo et al. , “Two-way quantum clock synchronization using non- degenerate quantum correlated photon pairs,” in Proc. IEEE Optoelec- tronics Global Conference (OGC) , Shenzhen, China, Sep. 2024, pp. 92–94

    2024

  71. [71]

    Clock synchronization with correlated photons,

    C. Spiess et al., “Clock synchronization with correlated photons,”Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 19, no. 5, p. 054082, May 2023

    2023

  72. [72]

    Demonstration of 50 km fiber-optic two-way quantum clock synchronization,

    H. Hong et al., “Demonstration of 50 km fiber-optic two-way quantum clock synchronization,” J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3723– 3728, Jun. 2022

    2022

  73. [73]

    Satellite-based positioning enhanced by quantum synchronization,

    S. S. Nande et al. , “Satellite-based positioning enhanced by quantum synchronization,” Comput. Netw., vol. 254, Jan. 2024

    2024

  74. [74]

    Quantum-assisted master clock in the sky: Global synchronization from satellites at subnanosecond precision,

    S. Ducoing et al., “Quantum-assisted master clock in the sky: Global synchronization from satellites at subnanosecond precision,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 23, no. 1, p. 014052, Jan. 2025

    2025

  75. [75]

    Quantum time synchronization for satellite net- works,

    S. S. Nande et al. , “Quantum time synchronization for satellite net- works,” in Proc. IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) , Big Sky, MT, USA, Mar. 2023, pp. 1–9

    2023

  76. [76]

    Synchronization of active atomic clocks via quantum and classical channels,

    A. Roth et al., “Synchronization of active atomic clocks via quantum and classical channels,” Phys. Rev. A , vol. 94, no. 4, p. 043841, Oct. 2016

    2016

  77. [77]

    Minimal model for spontaneous quantum synchro- nization,

    C. Benedetti et al., “Minimal model for spontaneous quantum synchro- nization,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 94, no. 5, p. 052118, Nov. 2016

    2016

  78. [78]

    Quantum synchronization and quantum state sharing in an irregular complex network,

    W. Li et al., “Quantum synchronization and quantum state sharing in an irregular complex network,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 95, no. 2, p. 022204, Feb. 2017

    2017

  79. [79]

    Photon arrival time tagging with many channels, sub- nanosecond deadtime, very high throughput, and fiber optic remote synchronization,

    M. Wahl et al., “Photon arrival time tagging with many channels, sub- nanosecond deadtime, very high throughput, and fiber optic remote synchronization,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. , vol. 91, no. 1, p. 013108, Jan. 2020

    2020

  80. [80]

    Quantum clock synchronization for future NASA deep space quantum links and fundamental science,

    J. Troupe et al., “Quantum clock synchronization for future NASA deep space quantum links and fundamental science,” arXiv:2209.15122, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.