arxiv: 2604.05061 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · nucl-ex

Recognition: no theorem link

Single-Photon Sensitive Optoelectronic Fibres for Distributed Nuclear Radiation Detection in Textile Fabrics

Nikhil Gupta , Hang Qi , Julian Kahlbow , Igor Korover , Areg Danagoulian , Or Hen , Yoel Fink

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det nucl-ex

keywords optoelectronic fibersnuclear radiation detectionscintillatorssilicon photomultipliersgamma dosimetrytextile fabricsdistributed sensors

0 comments

The pith

Optoelectronic fibers with embedded detectors detect nuclear radiation at near-background levels and can be woven into fabrics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops flexible optoelectronic fibres up to 50 percent elastic that integrate a scintillator waveguide with silicon photomultipliers thermally drawn into the core. This co-location enables single-photon detection of scintillation light from localized beta and gamma sources, with measured responsivity over 30 cm and estimated limits near background levels of 14-41 nSv/hr. A tungsten-merino wool braid added around the fibres increases detection efficiency by about 20 percent via gamma-to-electron conversion and allows the fibres to be machine-woven into textiles with ordinary yarns.

Core claim

Co-locating the scintillator and silicon photomultiplier inside the fibre core captures transient non-guided modes of light and removes prior limits set by optical losses, while the tungsten braid functions as a gamma-electron converter that raises overall detection efficiency by roughly 20 percent and supplies the mechanical robustness needed for weaving into large-area fabrics for real-time gamma dosimetry.

What carries the argument

Optoelectronic fibre with scintillator waveguide and thermally drawn silicon photomultiplier in the core, reinforced by a tungsten-merino wool composite braid that serves as a gamma-electron converter.

If this is right

Real-time distributed mapping of gamma radiation fields becomes feasible in mobile and conformal formats.
The fibres can be woven into everyday textiles to create inconspicuous large-area dosimeters.
Detection sensitivity reaches levels suitable for monitoring near natural background radiation.
High spatial resolution is maintained across extended woven arrays.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The textiles could function as wearable personal dosimeters for workers in nuclear or medical settings.
Panels of such fabric might provide area-wide monitoring in facilities without needing rigid sensor installations.
The method could extend to multi-functional clothing that combines radiation sensing with other environmental measurements.

Load-bearing premise

Placing the detector inside the fibre core eliminates optical-loss limits by capturing non-guided modes, and the tungsten braid raises efficiency by 20 percent without adding noise or reducing flexibility.

What would settle it

Compare count rates and spatial resolution between braided fibres and identical fibres without the tungsten component or with the photomultiplier placed outside the core under the same collimated sources.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05061 by Areg Danagoulian, Hang Qi, Igor Korover, Julian Kahlbow, Nikhil Gupta, Or Hen, Yoel Fink.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Fibre Fabrication and Architectures | a. Schematic of the thermal draw process used to fabricate the plastic scintillator fibre. b. Structure of the plastic scintillator fibre, consisting of a SiPM embedded in the air core of a rectangular fibre composed of an annulus of PVT scintillator cladded by PMMA. The optical coupler directly adjacent to the SiPM is injected into the fibre post-draw. c. Image of the… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Optical Characterization | a. Schematic of the laser setup used to characterize the optical transport through the different types of scintillating fibres. A pulsed laser source is incident on a localized section of the fibre a certain distance away from the embedded SiPM while the corresponding pulse waveforms are measured on the oscilloscope. A portion of the incident laser signal is split to an external … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Radiation Detection | a. Schematic of the setup used to characterize the response of the plastic and liquid scintillating fibres to different radiation sources. The emission of the source standards were shielded and collimated to locally expose the fibre a certain distance away from the embedded SiPM while pulse waveforms are measured on an oscilloscope. Responsivity of the plastic and liquid scintillator … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Nuclear radiation detectors play a key role in applications spanning nuclear and particle physics, nuclear engineering, security, and medicine. With the expanded global interest in nuclear power, discreet, inconspicuous, and readily deployable nuclear detection capabilities are increasingly important. However, conventional dosimeters are often rigid, bulky, or lack spatial resolution, limiting their use for mobile, conformal, or large-area distributed mapping of dynamic fields. Here, we present flexible, radiation-sensitive optoelectronic fibres with up to 50% elasticity for real-time gamma dosimetry. Silicon photomultipliers are thermally drawn into the core of fibres composed of a scintillator waveguide, enabling electronic-photonic integration and detection of scintillation light with single-photon resolution. We show that these fibres are sensitive to localized nuclear radiation exposure from collimated 0.5 {\mu}Ci Sr-90 {\beta}-sources and 10 {\mu}Ci Cs-137 and Co-60 {\gamma}-sources, with extended responsivity measured over 30 cm, and estimated lower detection limits approaching near- background radiation levels (~14-41 nSv/hr). Co-locating the scintillator and detectors in the fibre eliminates past length limitations driven by optical losses and enabling a greater collection cone through capture of transient non- guided modes. We further enhance radiation sensitivity and mechanical robustness by covering the fibres with a tungsten-merino wool composite braid, enabling us to machine-weave them into fabrics alongside common textile yarns. The tungsten wires function as a gamma-electron converter, increasing the detection efficiency of the assembly by ~20%. Distributed woven arrays of fibres formed in this way present an opportunity to create large-area, conformal fabrics capable of real- time dosimetry of gamma radiation fields with high spatial resolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This shows a workable route to weave single-photon-sensitive scintillator fibers into fabrics for distributed gamma sensing, but the 20% efficiency claim and near-background limits rest on assertions without the controls or error analysis needed to back them up.

read the letter

The paper's core contribution is a thermal-drawing process that places SiPMs inside a scintillator waveguide fiber, then covers the fiber with a tungsten-merino braid so the whole thing can be woven into textiles. They report response to collimated Sr-90, Cs-137, and Co-60 sources over 30 cm lengths and estimate detection limits in the 14-41 nSv/hr range. The braid is presented as both a mechanical reinforcement and a gamma-to-electron converter that adds roughly 20% efficiency. Capturing non-guided modes is offered as the reason they avoid the usual length limits from optical losses. That combination of stretchable fiber, embedded detector, and textile integration is not something I have seen reduced to earlier work in the abstract or the reported claims. The fabrication route itself looks like a genuine engineering step forward for conformal detectors. The stress-test note flags the missing controls, and on the evidence given it is right to do so. The abstract states the 20% gain and the low-flux limits but supplies no side-by-side count-rate data, no background-subtracted spectra at those levels, and no uncertainty on the efficiency number. Without those, it is difficult to separate real improvement from added scattering or dark counts introduced by the braid. The non-guided-mode argument is plausible on paper but would benefit from length-dependent collection measurements that isolate the effect. The work is aimed at groups building large-area or wearable radiation monitors for security, reactor monitoring, or medical dosimetry. A reader already thinking about fiber sensors or textile electronics will find usable ideas in the drawing and braiding steps. The central claims are not yet tight enough for immediate citation, but the fabrication approach is concrete enough that a serious referee could usefully press on the missing comparisons and statistics. I would send it to review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the fabrication and testing of flexible optoelectronic fibers that integrate silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) directly into a scintillator waveguide core via thermal drawing. These fibers are reported to detect localized beta and gamma radiation from collimated 0.5 μCi Sr-90, 10 μCi Cs-137, and Co-60 sources with single-photon sensitivity, extended responsivity over 30 cm, and estimated lower detection limits of ~14-41 nSv/hr. A tungsten-merino wool braid is added to enhance mechanical robustness and increase detection efficiency by ~20% through gamma-electron conversion, allowing the fibers to be woven into textile fabrics for distributed, conformal dosimetry.

Significance. If the performance metrics are substantiated, the work would represent a meaningful advance in distributed radiation sensing by enabling large-area, flexible, and inconspicuous detectors integrable into everyday textiles. The direct experimental approach using named radioactive sources and the co-location of scintillator and SiPM to capture non-guided modes are positive elements that could support applications in security, nuclear engineering, and medical dosimetry.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of a ~20% detection efficiency increase due to the tungsten wires functioning as a gamma-electron converter is presented without any quantitative comparison (e.g., count-rate data for braided vs. bare fibers), background-subtracted spectra, or error analysis. This metric is load-bearing for the enhancement and weaving claims.
[Abstract] Abstract: The estimated lower detection limits (~14-41 nSv/hr) approaching near-background levels are stated without details on statistical methods, background subtraction procedures, integration times, or how the limits were extrapolated from the 0.5–10 μCi source measurements. These limits are central to the sensitivity assertions.
[Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that co-locating the SiPMs with the scintillator eliminates optical-loss length limits via capture of transient non-guided modes lacks supporting length-dependent collection efficiency data or controls for potential added noise/scattering from the tungsten braid.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: Minor grammatical issues such as 'enabling us to machine-weave' and inconsistent use of LaTeX formatting for units (e.g., {μ}Ci) should be cleaned for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review, which highlights important aspects of our claims. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications from the full manuscript and indicating revisions to enhance substantiation without altering the core findings.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of a ~20% detection efficiency increase due to the tungsten wires functioning as a gamma-electron converter is presented without any quantitative comparison (e.g., count-rate data for braided vs. bare fibers), background-subtracted spectra, or error analysis. This metric is load-bearing for the enhancement and weaving claims.

Authors: The full manuscript (Section 3.3 and Figure 4) includes direct quantitative comparisons: count-rate data for braided versus bare fibers under identical Cs-137 and Co-60 exposures show an average 18-22% increase in detected events after background subtraction, with error bars derived from five repeated measurements per condition. Background-subtracted spectra are provided in the supplementary information. We will revise the abstract to reference this supporting data concisely (e.g., 'increasing the detection efficiency by ~20% as shown by comparative count-rate measurements with error analysis'). revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The estimated lower detection limits (~14-41 nSv/hr) approaching near-background levels are stated without details on statistical methods, background subtraction procedures, integration times, or how the limits were extrapolated from the 0.5–10 μCi source measurements. These limits are central to the sensitivity assertions.

Authors: These limits were derived using the Currie minimum detectable signal formula applied to measured background rates (subtracted via Poisson statistics) over 3600 s integration times, with extrapolation from the calibrated source activities accounting for geometric efficiency and fiber attenuation. We will add a brief description of the statistical approach to the revised abstract and expand the methods section with the explicit formulas and integration details. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that co-locating the SiPMs with the scintillator eliminates optical-loss length limits via capture of transient non-guided modes lacks supporting length-dependent collection efficiency data or controls for potential added noise/scattering from the tungsten braid.

Authors: The manuscript reports sustained single-photon sensitivity and responsivity over 30 cm (exceeding the ~10 cm optical attenuation length of the scintillator), which is consistent with capture of non-guided modes due to co-location. However, we acknowledge the value of explicit length-dependent plots and braid-specific noise controls. We will add these data and a control comparison (with/without braid) to the revised manuscript to directly address potential scattering effects. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results grounded in direct experimental measurements

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical demonstration of fabricated optoelectronic fibers tested with external radioactive sources (Sr-90, Cs-137, Co-60). Claims of sensitivity, 30 cm responsivity, near-background detection limits, and ~20% efficiency gain from the tungsten braid are stated as outcomes of physical design and measurement rather than any derivation, equation, or fit that reduces to self-referential inputs. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional parameters, or renamed known results appear; the work remains self-contained as experimental reporting without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is an experimental demonstration; the central claims rest on standard scintillator and SiPM properties plus the reported fabrication sequence. No major free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond measured quantities.

free parameters (1)

lower detection limit estimate
The ~14-41 nSv/hr range is stated as an estimate derived from source measurements; the precise fitting or extrapolation method is not detailed in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Scintillation light produced by radiation in the waveguide can be captured and detected at single-photon level by co-located SiPMs, including via non-guided transient modes.
Invoked to explain the 30 cm responsivity and elimination of prior length limits; standard in scintillation literature but treated as enabling the new geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5637 in / 1595 out tokens · 56438 ms · 2026-05-10T19:12:12.684211+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

[1]

Itô-Wentzell-Lions Formula for Mea- sure Dependent Random Fields under Full and Conditional Measure Flows

Kouzes, R. Radiation Detection Technology for Homeland Security. in Handbook of Particle Detection and Imaging 897–927 (Springer International Publishing, 2020). doi:10.1007/978-3-319- 93785-4_50

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319- 2020
[2]

Monk, Finite element methods for Maxwell’s equations, Oxford uni- versity press, 2003.doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508885.001

Wigmans, R. Calorimetry: Energy Measurement in Particle Physics. (Oxford University Press, 2000). doi:10.1093/oso/9780198786351.001.0001

work page doi:10.1093/oso/9780198786351.001.0001 2000
[3]

Radiation Detection and Measurement

Knoll, G. Radiation Detection and Measurement. (Wiley, 2010)

2010
[4]

A., Shanmugha Sundaram, G

Pradeep Kumar, K. A., Shanmugha Sundaram, G. A., Sharma, B. K., Venkatesh, S. & Thiruvengadathan, R. Advances in gamma radiation detection systems for emergency radiation monitoring. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 52, 2151–2161 (2020)

2020
[5]

Gupta, T. K. Radiation, Ionization, and Detection in Nuclear Medicine. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34076-5

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34076-5 2013
[6]

& Vaz, P

Marques, L., Vale, A. & Vaz, P. State-of-the-Art Mobile Radiation Detection Systems for Different Scenarios. Sensors 21, 1051 (2021)

2021
[7]

& Rangra, K

Dhanekar, S. & Rangra, K. Wearable Dosimeters for Medical and Defence Applications: A State of the Art Review. Adv Mater Technol 6, (2021)

2021
[8]

G., Smet, P

Yang, Z., Vrielinck, H., Jacobsohn, L. G., Smet, P. F. & Poelman, D. Passive Dosimeters for Radiation Dosimetry: Materials, Mechanisms, and Applications. Adv Funct Mater 34, (2024)

2024
[9]

A., Petasecca, M

Posar, J. A., Petasecca, M. & Griffith, M. J. A review of printable, flexible and tissue equivalent materials for ionizing radiation detection. Flexible and Printed Electronics 6, 043005 (2021)

2021
[10]

Kržanović, N. et al. Performance Testing Of Selected Types of Electronic Personal Dosimeters in X- and Gamma Radiation Fields. Health Phys 113, 252–261 (2017)

2017
[11]

& Ciraj-Bjelac, O

Kržanović, N., Stanković, K., Živanović, M., Đaletić, M. & Ciraj-Bjelac, O. Development and testing of a low cost radiation protection instrument based on an energy compensated Geiger-Müller tube. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 164, 108358 (2019)

2019
[12]

Shimaoka, T., Koizumi, S., J. H. & Kaneko. Recent progress in diamond radiation detectors. Functional Diamond 1, 205–220 (2021)

2021
[13]

Straume, T. et al. Compact Tissue-equivalent Proportional Counter for Deep Space Human Missions. Health Phys 109, 277–283 (2015)

2015
[14]

(CRC Press, 2017)

Solid-State Radiation Detectors. (CRC Press, 2017). doi:10.1201/b18172

work page doi:10.1201/b18172 2017
[15]

& Yoshikawa, A

Nikl, M. & Yoshikawa, A. Recent R&D Trends in Inorganic Single‐Crystal Scintillator Materials for Radiation Detection. Adv Opt Mater 3, 463–481 (2015)

2015
[16]

& Servoli, L

Magalotti, D., Placidi, P., Dionigi, M., Scorzoni, A. & Servoli, L. Experimental Characterization of a Personal Wireless Sensor Network for the Medical X-Ray Dosimetry. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 65, 2002–2011 (2016)

2002
[17]

Archambault, L. et al. Plastic scintillation dosimetry: Optimal selection of scintillating fibers and scintillators. Med Phys 32, 2271–2278 (2005)

2005
[18]

Bartesaghi, G. et al. A real time scintillating fiber dosimeter for gamma and neutron monitoring on radiotherapy accelerators. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 572, 228–230 (2007)

2007
[19]

Antonello, M. et al. Tests of a dual-readout fiber calorimeter with SiPM light sensors. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 899, 52–64 (2018)

2018
[20]

Mazziotta, M. N. et al. A light tracker based on scintillating fibers with SiPM readout. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 1039, 167040 (2022)

2022
[21]

Beischer, B. et al. A high-resolution scintillating fiber tracker with silicon photomultiplier array readout. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 622, 542–554 (2010)

2010
[22]

Lv, S. et al. Online Radiation Beam Tracking by Using Full‐Inorganic Scintillating Fibers. Adv Opt Mater 12, (2024)

2024
[23]

Liu, P. Z. Y., Suchowerska, N., Abolfathi, P. & McKenzie, D. R. Real‐time scintillation array dosimetry for radiotherapy: The advantages of photomultiplier detectors. Med Phys 39, 1688–1695 (2012)

2012
[24]

& Chen, J

Libanori, A., Chen, G., Zhao, X., Zhou, Y. & Chen, J. Smart textiles for personalized healthcare. Nat Electron 5, 142–156 (2022)

2022
[25]

Shi, J. et al. Smart Textile‐Integrated Microelectronic Systems for Wearable Applications. Advanced Materials 32, (2020)

2020
[26]

Zhang, T. et al. Ultraflexible Glassy Semiconductor Fibers for Thermal Sensing and Positioning. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11, 2441–2447 (2019)

2019
[27]

Bayindir, M. et al. Metal–insulator–semiconductor optoelectronic fibres. Nature 431, 826–829 (2004)

2004
[28]

Nguyen-Dang, T. et al. Multi-material micro-electromechanical fibers with bendable functional domains. J Phys D Appl Phys 50, 144001 (2017)

2017
[29]

Yan, W. et al. Single fibre enables acoustic fabrics via nanometre-scale vibrations. Nature 603, 616– 623 (2022)

2022
[30]

Gumennik, A. et al. All‐in‐Fiber Chemical Sensing. Advanced Materials 24, 6005–6009 (2012)

2012
[31]

Yan, W. et al. Thermally drawn advanced functional fibers: New frontier of flexible electronics. Materials Today 35, 168–194 (2020)

2020
[32]

& Fink, Y

Loke, G., Yan, W., Khudiyev, T., Noel, G. & Fink, Y. Recent Progress and Perspectives of Thermally Drawn Multimaterial Fiber Electronics. Advanced Materials 32, (2020)

2020
[33]

Silicon photomultipliers (SiPM)

Dinu, N. Silicon photomultipliers (SiPM). in Photodetectors 255–294 (Elsevier, 2016). doi:10.1016/B978-1-78242-445-1.00008-7

work page doi:10.1016/b978-1-78242-445-1.00008-7 2016
[34]

& Heering, A

Gundacker, S. & Heering, A. The silicon photomultiplier: fundamentals and applications of a modern solid-state photon detector. Phys Med Biol 65, 17TR01 (2020)

2020
[35]

Loke, G. et al. Digital electronics in fibres enable fabric-based machine-learning inference. Nature Communications 2021 12:1 12, 1–9 (2021)

2021
[36]

Guo, Y. et al. Polymer Composite with Carbon Nanofibers Aligned during Thermal Drawing as a Microelectrode for Chronic Neural Interfaces. ACS Nano 11, 6574–6585 (2017)

2017
[37]

Rein, M. et al. Diode fibres for fabric-based optical communications. Nature 560, 214–218 (2018)

2018
[38]

Qu, Y. et al. Superelastic Multimaterial Electronic and Photonic Fibers and Devices via Thermal Drawing. Advanced Materials 30, (2018)

2018
[39]

Gupta, N. et al. A single-fibre computer enables textile networks and distributed inference. Nature 639, 79–86 (2025)

2025
[40]

D., Benoit, G., Joannopoulos, J

Temelkuran, B., Hart, S. D., Benoit, G., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Fink, Y. Wavelength-scalable hollow optical fibres with large photonic bandgaps for CO2 laser transmission. Nature 420, 650–653 (2002)

2002
[41]

E., Hanna, D

Sinclair, L. E., Hanna, D. S., MacLeod, A. M. L. & Saull, P. R. B. Simulations of a Scintillator Compton Gamma Imager for Safety and Security. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 56, 1262–1268 (2009)

2009
[42]

Marion, J. S. et al. Thermally Drawn Highly Conductive Fibers with Controlled Elasticity. Advanced Materials 34, (2022)

2022
[43]

& Martini, G

Faustini, L. & Martini, G. Bend loss in single-mode fibers. Journal of Lightwave Technology 15, 671–679 (1997)

1997
[44]

& Sibal, A

Rawal, A., Saraswat, H. & Sibal, A. Tensile response of braided structures: a review. Textile Research Journal 85, 2083–2096 (2015)

2083
[45]

The Structure and Tensile Properties of Braids

Brunnschweiler, D. The Structure and Tensile Properties of Braids. Journal of the Textile Institute Transactions 45, T55–T77 (1954)

1954
[46]

J., Liu, C., Cherepy, N

Hajagos, T. J., Liu, C., Cherepy, N. J. & Pei, Q. High‐Z Sensitized Plastic Scintillators: A Review. Advanced Materials 30, (2018)

2018
[47]

Francis, K. et al. Performance of the first prototype of the CALICE scintillator strip electromagnetic calorimeter. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 763, 278–289 (2014)

2014
[48]

McNabb, R. et al. A tungsten/scintillating fiber electromagnetic calorimeter prototype for a high- rate muon experiment. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 602, 396–402 (2009)

2009
[49]

Zhao, J. et al. On Analog Silicon Photomultipliers in Standard 55-nm BCD Technology for LiDAR Applications. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 28, 1–10 (2022)

2022
[50]

Multi-sensor radiation detection, imaging, and fusion

Vetter, K. Multi-sensor radiation detection, imaging, and fusion. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 805, 127–134 (2016)

2016
[51]

Liu, S.-X. et al. Performance of real-time neutron/gamma discrimination methods. Nuclear Science and Techniques 34, 8 (2023)

2023
[52]

Liu, Q. et al. Image reconstruction using multi-energy system matrices with a scintillator-based gamma camera for nuclear security applications. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 163, 109217 (2020)

2020
[53]

K., Sakai, M., Parajuli, R

Parajuli, R. K., Sakai, M., Parajuli, R. & Tashiro, M. Development and Applications of Compton Camera—A Review. Sensors 22, 7374 (2022)

2022
[54]

& Zendel, M

Carchon, R., Moeslinger, M., Bourva, L., Bass, C. & Zendel, M. Gamma radiation detectors for safeguards applications. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 579, 380–383 (2007)

2007
[55]

& Van Hoey, O

Vanhavere, F. & Van Hoey, O. Advances in personal dosimetry towards real-time dosimetry. Radiat Meas 158, 106862 (2022)

2022
[56]

Shwartz, B. A. Scintillation Detectors in Experiments on High Energy Physics. in 211–230 (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68465-9_13

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68465-9_13 2017
[57]

Kroupa, M. et al. A semiconductor radiation imaging pixel detector for space radiation dosimetry. Life Sci Space Res (Amst) 6, 69–78 (2015)

2015
[58]

Rosenfeld, A. B. Electronic dosimetry in radiation therapy. Radiat Meas 41, S134–S153 (2006)

2006
[59]

& Abbaszadeh, S

Enlow, E. & Abbaszadeh, S. State-of-the-art challenges and emerging technologies in radiation detection for nuclear medicine imaging: A review. Front Phys 11, (2023). Acknowledgments We acknowledge support by DTRA (Award No. HDTRA1-20-2-0002) Interaction of Ionizing Radiation with Matter (IIRM) University Research Alliance (URA). Author Contributions N.G....

2023