pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05244 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.stat-mech· math-ph· math.MP· quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Edge universality in Floquet sideband spectra

Miguel Tierz

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MPquant-ph
keywords Floquet sideband spectraBessel kernelAiry kernelphoto-assisted shot noiseFermi edgenon-interacting fermionsmesoscopic transportrandom matrix theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

For non-interacting fermions under monochromatic phase drive, outgoing sideband occupations at a sharp Fermi edge follow the discrete Bessel kernel exactly at any amplitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that sideband occupations near the Fermi edge in driven non-interacting fermions are controlled by the discrete Bessel kernel for any drive strength. This exact result follows from connecting linear detection to the Floquet scattering matrix through commensurate gating that isolates one coherence-order block. In the large-amplitude limit the kernel edge rescales by A to the one-third power and approaches the Airy kernel of random matrix theory. A direct consequence is that the deficit of photo-assisted shot-noise slope from its high-bias value collapses onto the Airy-kernel diagonal. The analysis also identifies a crossover temperature below which the Airy scaling is sharp and extends the picture to biased terminals and multi-tone drives.

Core claim

For non-interacting fermions under a monochromatic phase drive in the Tien-Gordon regime, the outgoing sideband occupations at a sharp Fermi edge are governed by the discrete Bessel kernel, an exact result at any drive amplitude A. In the large-amplitude regime the edge of this kernel converges on the A^{1/3} scale to the Airy kernel of random matrix theory. This universality produces a concrete transport signature: the deficit of the photo-assisted shot-noise slope from its high-bias plateau collapses onto the Airy-kernel diagonal. The derivation relies on a bridge between the linear detection chain and the Floquet scattering matrix in which commensurate gating isolates a single coherence-0

What carries the argument

The bridge between the linear detection chain and the Floquet scattering matrix, with commensurate gating isolating a single coherence-order block of the one-body correlator.

If this is right

  • The deficit of the photo-assisted shot-noise slope from its high-bias plateau collapses onto the Airy-kernel diagonal.
  • Airy scaling is sharp below an identified crossover temperature.
  • The same framework applies to biased two-terminal occupations.
  • Multi-tone drives make Pearcey-kernel cusps accessible in Floquet-Sambe space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar kernel structures may govern sideband statistics in other periodically driven non-equilibrium systems beyond mesoscopic conductors.
  • Time-resolved transport experiments in quantum point contacts under microwave driving could test the predicted amplitude-dependent scaling.
  • The result links Floquet edge statistics to broader questions of universality in non-equilibrium quantum transport.
  • Varying the number of drive tones offers a route to observe higher-order Pearcey cusps in measurable noise quantities.

Load-bearing premise

The fermions are non-interacting, the Fermi edge is perfectly sharp, and the drive is monochromatic with commensurate gating that isolates one coherence block.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of sideband occupation numbers or the photo-assisted shot-noise slope in a driven two-terminal mesoscopic conductor at varying amplitudes and low temperature, checking whether the deficit collapses onto the Airy-kernel diagonal on the A^{1/3} scale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05244 by Miguel Tierz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Windowed analysis of a Floquet signal. A finite time/frequency window defines the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Floquet scattering between harmonics. Sideband [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Airy scaling collapse of sideband occupations. (a) Diagonal of the discrete Bessel kernel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Two-point kernel at the soft edge for A = 100. (a) Rescaled discrete Bessel kernel κAK (disc) A (νA(s), νA(0)) (dots) compared to the Airy kernel KAi(s, 0) (solid curve) as a function of s at fixed t = 0. (b) Difference κAK (disc) A − KAi over the edge region, showing O(A−1/3 ) residual errors that decrease toward zero as A → ∞. and then analyzing the stationary-point conditions of the exponent to locate f… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Heat map of the discrete Bessel kernel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of Ai2 (s) (dashed) and the Airy-kernel diagonal KAi(s, s) = Ai′ (s) 2−s Ai(s) 2 (solid), related by −∂sKAi(s, s) = Ai2 (s). (a) Linear scale: Ai2 oscillates in the bulk (s < 0), while KAi(s, s) decreases monotonically. (b) Log scale in the tail (s > 0): both decay with the same essential exponential e − 4 3 s 3/2 (dotted guide) but with different algebraic prefactors (s −1/2 for Ai2 versus s −1… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Plateau deficit collapse at T = 0 (V > 0): the normalized deficit SA(s) = κAK (disc) A (νV , νV ) (dots, Eq. (9.7)) converges to KAi(s, s) (solid black) for A = 20, 50, 100, 200, where s = (eV /ℏΩ − A)/κA. The result for V < 0 is identical by the symmetry SI (V ) = SI (−V ). (b) Kernel-level thermal crossover (Sec. 9.2): the finite-temperature Airy kernel diagonal K (θ) Ai (s, s) interpolates between t… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We show that, for non-interacting fermions under a monochromatic phase drive (Tien--Gordon regime), the outgoing sideband occupations at a sharp Fermi edge are governed by the discrete Bessel kernel -- an exact result at any drive amplitude~$A$. In the large-amplitude regime the edge of this kernel converges, on the $A^{1/3}$ scale, to the Airy kernel of random matrix theory. This universality has a direct transport consequence: the deficit of the photo-assisted shot-noise slope from its high-bias plateau collapses onto the Airy-kernel diagonal. The derivation rests on a bridge between the linear detection chain and the Floquet scattering matrix: commensurate gating isolates a single coherence-order block of the one-body correlator. We identify the crossover temperature below which the Airy scaling is sharp, extend the analysis to biased two-terminal occupations, and argue that multi-tone drives make Pearcey-kernel cusps accessible in Floquet--Sambe space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that for non-interacting fermions in the Tien-Gordon regime under monochromatic phase drive, the outgoing sideband occupations at a sharp Fermi edge are governed exactly by the discrete Bessel kernel for any drive amplitude A. In the large-A regime this edge converges on the A^{1/3} scale to the Airy kernel of random matrix theory, with the direct transport consequence that the deficit of the photo-assisted shot-noise slope from its high-bias plateau collapses onto the Airy-kernel diagonal. The derivation is effected by a bridge in which commensurate gating isolates a single coherence-order block of the one-body correlator; the work also identifies the crossover temperature for sharp Airy scaling, extends the analysis to biased two-terminal occupations, and argues that multi-tone drives make Pearcey-kernel cusps accessible in Floquet-Sambe space.

Significance. If the exact mapping holds, the result supplies a concrete physical realization of the discrete Bessel kernel and its Airy asymptotics in driven mesoscopic transport, together with a measurable noise signature that collapses without adjustable parameters. This would constitute a non-trivial extension of RMT universality into the Floquet domain and a falsifiable prediction for experiments on AC-driven quantum dots or nanowires. The suggested accessibility of Pearcey kernels via multi-tone drives further broadens the potential scope.

major comments (1)
  1. [Derivation of the bridge between linear detection chain and Floquet scattering matrix (as outlined in the abstract and §] The exact discrete Bessel kernel identity at arbitrary A rests on the assertion that commensurate gating isolates a single coherence-order block of the one-body correlator without residual mixing from the linear detection chain. The manuscript must supply an explicit algebraic demonstration (including any error bounds arising from finite detection bandwidth, weak higher harmonics in the drive, or non-strict block-diagonality of the Floquet scattering matrix) that this isolation is exact rather than approximate; without such a demonstration the subsequent A^{1/3} Airy convergence and noise-slope collapse do not follow rigorously.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a brief parenthetical definition or reference for the discrete Bessel kernel to aid readers outside random-matrix theory.
  2. [Main text] Notation for the coherence-order blocks and the A^{1/3} scaling variable should be introduced with a single consistent symbol set in the main text to avoid ambiguity when comparing the exact kernel to its asymptotic form.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, the positive assessment of significance, and the constructive major comment. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript to supply the requested explicit algebraic demonstration together with error bounds.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The exact discrete Bessel kernel identity at arbitrary A rests on the assertion that commensurate gating isolates a single coherence-order block of the one-body correlator without residual mixing from the linear detection chain. The manuscript must supply an explicit algebraic demonstration (including any error bounds arising from finite detection bandwidth, weak higher harmonics in the drive, or non-strict block-diagonality of the Floquet scattering matrix) that this isolation is exact rather than approximate; without such a demonstration the subsequent A^{1/3} Airy convergence and noise-slope collapse do not follow rigorously.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit algebraic demonstration is required for full rigor. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection (placed immediately after the definition of the Floquet scattering matrix) that derives the isolation step by step. Starting from the time-periodic drive, the Floquet scattering matrix S_F is strictly block-diagonal in the coherence index n because only the fundamental frequency ω is present; the matrix elements connecting different n vanish identically. The linear detection chain with commensurate gating (period 2π/ω) projects the one-body correlator onto the n=0 block via the integral ∫ dt e^{i n ω t} G(t,t') with n=0, yielding exactly the discrete Bessel kernel K_{m,n}(A) = ∑_k J_{m-k}(A) J_{n-k}(A) with no residual off-block terms. For finite detection bandwidth Δω we obtain an explicit error bound O(Δω/ω) that vanishes in the ideal limit. For weak higher harmonics of relative amplitude ε the off-block mixing is bounded by O(ε), again vanishing as ε→0. Non-strict block-diagonality is therefore absent in the monochromatic case and controlled by the stated bounds otherwise. With this demonstration in place the subsequent A^{1/3} Airy asymptotics and the noise-slope collapse follow rigorously from the known large-A asymptotics of the Bessel kernel. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation follows from scattering-matrix block isolation under stated assumptions

full rationale

The abstract and derivation sketch present the discrete Bessel kernel as following directly from the Floquet scattering matrix of non-interacting fermions once commensurate gating isolates a single coherence-order block of the one-body correlator. This is an algebraic mapping under the explicit assumptions of monochromatic drive, non-interacting particles, and sharp Fermi edge; no parameter is fitted to the target kernel, no self-citation supplies the central identity, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The subsequent Airy asymptotics are standard large-A limits of the Bessel kernel and do not loop back to the inputs. The provided text contains no equations or citations that reduce the claimed result to a definition or prior self-result by construction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions of non-interacting fermions and a monochromatic drive; no free parameters are introduced or fitted, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Non-interacting fermions in the Tien-Gordon regime
    Required for the exact Bessel-kernel result to hold at any amplitude.
  • domain assumption Sharp Fermi edge
    Necessary for the edge universality and Airy convergence to apply.
  • domain assumption Monochromatic phase drive with commensurate gating
    Isolates the single coherence-order block used in the scattering-matrix bridge.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5466 in / 1257 out tokens · 82695 ms · 2026-05-10T18:36:23.745086+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Platero and R

    G. Platero and R. Aguado, Photon-assisted transport in semiconductor nanostructures,Phys. Rep.395, 1–157 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.01.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.01.004 2004

  2. [2]

    Haug and A.-P

    H. Haug and A.-P. Jauho,Quantum Kinetics in Transport and Optics of Semiconductors, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73564-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73564-9 2008

  3. [3]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification,Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1155–1208 (2010). doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1155

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1155 2010

  4. [4]

    Moskalets,Scattering Matrix Approach to Non-Stationary Quantum Transport(Imperial College Press, London, 2011)

    M. Moskalets,Scattering Matrix Approach to Non-Stationary Quantum Transport(Imperial College Press, London, 2011). doi:10.1142/p822

    work page doi:10.1142/p822 2011

  5. [5]

    Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in periodically driven optical lattices,Rev

    A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in periodically driven optical lattices,Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004 (2017). doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.89.011004

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.011004 2017

  6. [6]

    H. P. Yuen and V. W. S. Chan, Noise in homodyne and heterodyne detection,Opt. Lett.8, 177–179 (1983). doi:10.1364/OL.8.000177

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.8.000177 1983

  7. [7]

    P. K. Tien and J. P. Gordon, Multiphoton process observed in the interaction of microwave fields with the tunneling between superconductor films,Phys. Rev.129, 647–651 (1963). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.129.647

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.129.647 1963

  8. [8]

    G. B. Lesovik and L. S. Levitov, Noise in an ac biased junction: nonstationary Aharonov–Bohm effect,Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 538–541 (1994). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.538 28

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.538 1994

  9. [9]

    M. H. Pedersen and M. Büttiker, Scattering theory of photon-assisted electron transport,Phys. Rev. B58, 12993–13006 (1998). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.58.12993

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.58.12993 1998

  10. [10]

    Moskalets and M

    M. Moskalets and M. Büttiker, Floquet scattering theory of quantum pumps,Phys. Rev. B 66, 205320 (2002). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.66.205320

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.205320 2002

  11. [11]

    photon- assisted

    R. J. Schoelkopf, A. A. Kozhevnikov, D. E. Prober, and M. J. Rooks, Observation of “photon- assisted” shot noise in a phase-coherent conductor,Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2437–2440 (1998). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2437

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2437 1998

  12. [12]

    Reydellet, P

    L.-H. Reydellet, P. Roche, D. C. Glattli, B. Etienne, and Y. Jin, Quantum parti- tion noise of photon-created electron-hole pairs,Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 176803 (2003). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.176803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.176803 2003

  13. [13]

    V. S. Rychkov, M. L. Polianski, and M. Büttiker, Photon-assisted electron-hole shot noise in multiterminal conductors,Phys. Rev. B72, 155326 (2005). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72.155326

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.155326 2005

  14. [14]

    L. S. Levitov, H.-W. Lee, and G. B. Lesovik, Electron counting statistics and coherent states of electric current,J. Math. Phys.37, 4845–4866 (1996). doi:10.1063/1.531672

    work page doi:10.1063/1.531672 1996

  15. [15]

    Vanević, Y

    M. Vanević, Y. V. Nazarov, and W. Belzig, Elementary events of electron trans- fer in a voltage-driven quantum point contact,Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 076601 (2007). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.076601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.076601 2007

  16. [16]

    Dubois, T

    J. Dubois, T. Jullien, F. Portier, P. Roche, A. Cavanna, Y. Jin, W. Wegscheider, P. Roulleau, and D. C. Glattli, Minimal-excitation states for electron quantum optics using levitons,Nature 502, 659–663 (2013). doi:10.1038/nature12713

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12713 2013

  17. [17]

    Jullien, P

    T. Jullien, P. Roulleau, B. Roche, A. Cavanna, Y. Jin, and D. C. Glattli, Quantum tomography of an electron,Nature514, 603–607 (2014). doi:10.1038/nature13821

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13821 2014

  18. [18]

    P. J. Forrester,Log-Gases and Random Matrices(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2010). doi:10.1515/9781400835416

    work page doi:10.1515/9781400835416 2010

  19. [19]

    A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka,Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems(McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971)

    1971

  20. [20]

    G. N. Watson,A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1944)

    1944

  21. [21]

    F. W. J. Olver,Asymptotics and Special Functions(Academic Press, New York, 1974)

    1974

  22. [22]

    J. B. Hough, M. Krishnapur, Y. Peres, and B. Virág,Zeros of Gaussian Analytic Func- tions and Determinantal Point Processes(American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2009). doi:10.1090/ulect/051

    work page doi:10.1090/ulect/051 2009

  23. [23]

    C. A. Tracy and H. Widom, Level-spacing distributions and the Airy kernel,Commun. Math. Phys.159, 151–174 (1994). doi:10.1007/BF02100489

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02100489 1994

  24. [24]

    Sambe, Steady states and quasienergies of a quantum-mechanical system in an oscillating field,Phys

    H. Sambe, Steady states and quasienergies of a quantum-mechanical system in an oscillating field,Phys. Rev. A7, 2203–2213 (1973). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.7.2203

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.7.2203 1973

  25. [25]

    Brézin and S

    E. Brézin and S. Hikami, Universal singularity at the closure of a gap in a random matrix theory,Phys. Rev. E57, 4140–4149 (1998). doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.57.4140 29

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.57.4140 1998

  26. [26]

    C. A. Tracy and H. Widom, The Pearcey process,Commun. Math. Phys.263, 381–400 (2006). doi:10.1007/s00220-005-1506-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-005-1506-3 2006

  27. [27]

    E. D. Black, An introduction to Pound–Drever–Hall laser frequency stabilization,Am. J. Phys. 69, 79–87 (2001). doi:10.1119/1.1286663

    work page doi:10.1119/1.1286663 2001

  28. [28]

    G. C. Bjorklund, M. D. Levenson, W. Lenth, and C. Ortiz, Frequency modulation (FM) spectroscopy,Appl. Phys. B32, 145–152 (1983). doi:10.1007/BF00688820

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00688820 1983

  29. [29]

    F. J. Harris, On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform, Proc. IEEE66, 51–83 (1978). doi:10.1109/PROC.1978.10837

    work page doi:10.1109/proc.1978.10837 1978

  30. [30]

    Li and L

    W. Li and L. E. Reichl, Floquet scattering through a time-periodic potential,Phys. Rev. B 60, 15732–15741 (1999). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.60.15732

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.60.15732 1999

  31. [31]

    Roussel, C

    B. Roussel, C. Cabart, G. Fève, E. Thibierge, and P. Degiovanni, Electron quan- tum optics as quantum signal processing,Phys. Status Solidi B254, 1600621 (2017). doi:10.1002/pssb.201600621

    work page doi:10.1002/pssb.201600621 2017

  32. [32]

    Johansson, Discrete orthogonal polynomial ensembles and the Plancherel measure,Ann

    K. Johansson, Discrete orthogonal polynomial ensembles and the Plancherel measure,Ann. Math.153, 259–296 (2001). doi:10.2307/2661375

    work page doi:10.2307/2661375 2001

  33. [33]

    Borodin, Riemann–Hilbert problem and the discrete Bessel kernel,Int

    A. Borodin, Riemann–Hilbert problem and the discrete Bessel kernel,Int. Math. Res. Not. 2000, 467–494 (2000). doi:10.1155/S107379280000026X

    work page doi:10.1155/s107379280000026x 2000

  34. [34]

    Johansson, From Gumbel to Tracy–Widom,Probab

    K. Johansson, From Gumbel to Tracy–Widom,Probab. Theory Relat. Fields138, 75–112 (2007). doi:10.1007/s00440-006-0012-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00440-006-0012-7 2007

  35. [35]

    D. S. Dean, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Finite-temperature free fermions and the Kardar–Parisi–Zhang equation at finite time,Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 110402 (2015). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.110402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.110402 2015

  36. [36]

    D. S. Dean, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Noninteracting fermions at finite temperature in ad-dimensional trap: universal correlations,Phys. Rev. A94, 063622 (2016). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.94.063622

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.94.063622 2016

  37. [37]

    V. I. Arnold, S. M. Gusein-Zade, and A. N. Varchenko,Singularities of Differentiable Maps, Vol. I (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1985). doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5154-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5154-5 1985

  38. [38]

    M. V. Berry and C. Upstill, Catastrophe optics: morphologies of caustics and their diffraction patterns,Prog. Optics18, 257–346 (1980). doi:10.1016/S0079-6638(08)70215-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0079-6638(08)70215-4 1980

  39. [39]

    Pearcey, The structure of an electromagnetic field in the neighbourhood of a cusp of a caustic,Philos

    T. Pearcey, The structure of an electromagnetic field in the neighbourhood of a cusp of a caustic,Philos. Mag.37, 311–317 (1946). doi:10.1080/14786444608561335

    work page doi:10.1080/14786444608561335 1946

  40. [40]

    P. M. Bleher and A. B. J. Kuijlaars, Largenlimit of Gaussian random matrices with ex- ternal source, part III: double scaling limit,Commun. Math. Phys.270, 481–517 (2007). doi:10.1007/s00220-006-0159-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-006-0159-1 2007

  41. [41]

    Adler, P

    M. Adler, P. L. Ferrari, and P. van Moerbeke, Airy processes with wanderers and new univer- sality classes,Ann. Probab.38, 714–769 (2010). doi:10.1214/09-AOP493

    work page doi:10.1214/09-aop493 2010

  42. [42]

    D. S. Dean, P. Le Doussal, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Noninteracting fermions in a trap and random matrix theory,J. Phys. A52, 144006 (2019). doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab098d 30

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab098d 2019

  43. [43]

    E. Duse, K. Johansson, and A. Metcalfe, The cusp–Airy process,Electron. J. Probab.21, 1–50 (2016). doi:10.1214/16-EJP2

    work page doi:10.1214/16-ejp2 2016

  44. [44]

    Ya. M. Blanter and M. Büttiker, Shot noise in mesoscopic conductors,Phys. Rep.336, 1–166 (2000). doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00123-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(99)00123-4 2000

  45. [45]

    Safi, Driven strongly correlated quantum circuits and Hall edge states: unified pho- toassisted noise and revisited minimal excitations,Phys

    I. Safi, Driven strongly correlated quantum circuits and Hall edge states: unified pho- toassisted noise and revisited minimal excitations,Phys. Rev. B106, 205130 (2022). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.205130

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.205130 2022

  46. [46]

    Taktak and I

    I. Taktak and I. Safi, AC driven fractional quantum Hall systems: uncovering unexpected features, arXiv:2502.07622 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Fontaine, D

    Q. Fontaine, D. Squizzato, F. Baboux, I. Amelio, A. Lemaître, M. Morassi, I. Sagnes, L. Le Gratiet, A. Harouri, M. Wouters, I. Carusotto, A. Amo, M. Richard, A. Minguzzi, L. Canet, S. Ravets, and J. Bloch, Kardar–Parisi–Zhang universality in a one-dimensional polariton condensate,Nature608, 687–691 (2022). doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05001-8 31

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05001-8 2022