pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05735 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · physics.comp-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Does the total energy difference method for modelling core level photoemission fail for bigger molecules?

Marta Berholts , Tanel K\"a\"ambre , Arvo T\~onisoo , Rainer P\"arna , Vambola Kisand , Juhan Matthias Kahk
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph physics.comp-ph
keywords core level photoemissiontotal energy difference methodanthronecore electron binding energiesΔSCFmedium-sized moleculesphotoelectron spectroscopy
0
0 comments X

The pith

New experimental data for anthrone shows the total energy difference method accurately predicts core electron binding energies even in larger molecules.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper remeasures the gas-phase C 1s photoelectron spectrum of the 25-atom anthrone molecule and reports binding energies that differ from earlier published values but match closely with total energy difference calculations using the SCAN functional. It broadens the test to a set of 44 core electron binding energies drawn from molecules ranging between 10 and 40 atoms, obtaining a mean absolute error of 0.19 eV that is comparable to the accuracy achieved on smaller molecules. The authors conclude that the method remains suitable for modeling localized core excitations across this size range. If the new measurements and calculations are correct, the apparent size-dependent failure reported previously is removed and the approach can be applied to medium-sized organic molecules without invoking more expensive alternatives.

Core claim

The central claim is that the Δ-self-consistent-field method does not lose accuracy for larger molecules. Fresh gas-phase measurements of anthrone's C 1s binding energies differ markedly from prior literature but agree well with ΔSCF results obtained with the SCAN functional. When the same approach is applied to 44 core binding energies across molecules containing 10 to 40 atoms, the mean absolute error is 0.19 eV, matching the performance seen on small-molecule benchmarks. These findings, together with general theoretical considerations, indicate that the total energy difference method is suitable for localized excitations in both small and large molecules.

What carries the argument

The Δ-self-consistent-field (ΔSCF) method, which obtains core electron binding energies as the difference in total energy between the neutral ground state and a core-hole state computed self-consistently.

If this is right

  • The total energy difference method can be applied reliably to core level calculations on molecules containing between 10 and 40 atoms.
  • Earlier large errors reported for anthrone originated in inaccuracies in the published experimental spectrum rather than in the computational approach.
  • The method's performance on the 44-value dataset is consistent with prior small-molecule benchmarks, supporting its use for localized excitations without size-dependent degradation.
  • General theoretical considerations in the paper suggest the approach remains promising for other extended systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the agreement generalizes, routine computational modeling of core photoemission in larger organic and biological molecules can rely on this efficient total-energy-difference route rather than switching to more costly many-body methods.
  • Re-examination of experimental spectra for other molecules where the method previously appeared to fail could resolve similar discrepancies.
  • The choice of a functional that handles core-hole states well, such as SCAN, may be sufficient to maintain accuracy without empirical per-molecule tuning.

Load-bearing premise

The newly recorded gas-phase photoelectron spectrum of anthrone is free of systematic calibration errors or sample impurities, and the SCAN functional does not require molecule-by-molecule adjustments to produce the reported agreement.

What would settle it

An independent gas-phase C 1s photoelectron spectrum of anthrone that reproduces the older published binding energies instead of the new values reported in this work.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05735 by Arvo T\~onisoo, Juhan Matthias Kahk, Marta Berholts, Rainer P\"arna, Tanel K\"a\"ambre, Vambola Kisand.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Molecular set used in this work. Shown structures are geometry-optimized. Color code: grey, C; white, H; red, O; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Experimental and calculated XPS spectra of anthrone showing the C 1s region: a) and b), and the O 1s region: c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The $\Delta$-Self-Consistent-Field ($\Delta$SCF) method permits calculations of core electron binding energies in materials and molecules at a modest computational cost. However, it has been reported that whilst this method works well for small molecules, its accuracy drops off dramatically when larger systems are considered. Particularly large errors have been reported for the anthrone molecule, which consists of 25 atoms. In this work, the gas-phase photoelectron spectrum of anthrone is revisited both computationally and experimentally. The measured C 1s binding energies in anthrone differ markedly from previously published values, and the new experimental results are in good agreement with $\Delta$SCF calculations based on the SCAN functional. In addition, the performance of the $\Delta$SCF method is evaluated for a dataset of 44 core electron binding energies from medium sized molecules containing between 10 and 40 atoms. The mean absolute error for this dataset - 0.19 eV - is comparable to the results of previous computational benchmarks. Overall, these results and general theoretical considerations indicate that the $\Delta$SCF method is suitable for modelling localized excitations in both small and large molecules, and applications to other extended systems are also promising.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the ΔSCF method for core electron binding energies does not fail for larger molecules. This is supported by new experimental gas-phase C 1s photoelectron data for anthrone (25 atoms) that differ from previous literature values and agree with ΔSCF calculations using the SCAN meta-GGA functional. The authors also report a mean absolute error of 0.19 eV for ΔSCF on a dataset of 44 core binding energies from molecules ranging from 10 to 40 atoms, which is comparable to benchmarks for smaller systems. They conclude that the method is suitable for localized excitations in both small and large molecules.

Significance. If the new experimental results hold, the work is significant as it addresses and potentially resolves reported failures of ΔSCF for medium-sized molecules like anthrone, providing evidence that the method remains accurate with a modest computational cost. The compilation of 44 binding energies and the low MAE offer a useful benchmark for the community. The paper credits the agreement with SCAN-ΔSCF without parameter fitting, which is a strength. This could encourage broader application to extended systems where more expensive methods are prohibitive.

major comments (1)
  1. The revised C 1s binding energies for anthrone are pivotal to the paper's central claim, as they 'differ markedly' from prior values and align with theory (abstract). However, the manuscript lacks specific details on the absolute calibration procedure (e.g., reference lines, simultaneous standards, or work function), sample purity verification (e.g., mass spectrometry or temperature checks during sublimation), and the deconvolution method for the overlapping C 1s peaks. Without these, systematic errors cannot be ruled out as the source of the discrepancy with earlier experiments.
minor comments (2)
  1. The title poses a question; a declarative title might better reflect the affirmative conclusion reached in the abstract and discussion.
  2. The abstract refers to 'general theoretical considerations' supporting the conclusion; these should be briefly outlined or referenced in the main text for completeness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the significance of our work and for the recommendation of major revision. We address the single major comment below in detail.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The revised C 1s binding energies for anthrone are pivotal to the paper's central claim, as they 'differ markedly' from prior values and align with theory (abstract). However, the manuscript lacks specific details on the absolute calibration procedure (e.g., reference lines, simultaneous standards, or work function), sample purity verification (e.g., mass spectrometry or temperature checks during sublimation), and the deconvolution method for the overlapping C 1s peaks. Without these, systematic errors cannot be ruled out as the source of the discrepancy with earlier experiments.

    Authors: We agree that the experimental details are essential for validating the new anthrone C 1s binding energies and for allowing independent assessment of possible systematic differences with prior literature. In the revised manuscript we will expand the experimental methods section to provide: (i) the full absolute calibration procedure, including the specific reference lines, any simultaneous standards, and work-function considerations; (ii) sample-purity verification via mass spectrometry together with the temperature monitoring protocol used during sublimation; and (iii) a complete description of the peak-deconvolution procedure for the overlapping C 1s features, specifying the fitting functions, constraints, and software employed. These additions will directly address the referee’s concern and strengthen the central claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct empirical comparison of new measurements to standard ΔSCF

full rationale

The paper reports new gas-phase C 1s photoelectron spectra for anthrone, notes that these differ from prior literature values, and shows agreement with unmodified ΔSCF calculations using the SCAN functional. It further benchmarks the same method on an independent set of 44 core-level binding energies from 10–40 atom molecules, obtaining an MAE of 0.19 eV. No parameters are fitted to the target observables, no self-referential definitions or equations are introduced, and the central claim rests on external experimental data rather than self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors’ prior work. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained as a straightforward validation exercise.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard DFT total-energy differences and experimental photoelectron spectroscopy; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5541 in / 1186 out tokens · 42947 ms · 2026-05-10T19:05:40.538539+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    In the implementation used in this work [43], the self-energy is first calculated on the imaginary frequency axis, and then analytically continued onto the real axis

    starting point. In the implementation used in this work [43], the self-energy is first calculated on the imaginary frequency axis, and then analytically continued onto the real axis. For the analytic continuation, a Pade approximant with 16 parameters was employed. Quadruple-zeta numerical atom-centered basis sets with valence-correlation consistency from...

  2. [2]

    The measured peak positions are significantly different from the values reported in ref

    The experimental C 1s spectrum (Figure 2a) contains two main features: a strong, broad, and asymmetric peak at 290.27 eV, and a weaker peak at 292.7 eV. The measured peak positions are significantly different from the values reported in ref. [57, 58]: 290.72 eV and 293.6 eV, respectively (see the comparison in Table I). Due to this discrepancy, the method...

  3. [3]

    Hait and M

    Diptarka Hait and Martin Head-Gordon. Excited State Orbital Optimization via Minimizing the Square of the Gradient: General Approach and Application to Singly and Doubly Excited States via Density Functional Theory.J. Chem. Theory Comput., 16(3): 1699–1710, March 2020. ISSN 1549-9618, 1549-9626. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01127

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01127 2020

  4. [4]

    Orbital Optimized Density Functional Theory for Electronic Excited States.J

    Diptarka Hait and Martin Head-Gordon. Orbital Optimized Density Functional Theory for Electronic Excited States.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 12(19):4517– 4529, May 2021. ISSN 1948-7185, 1948-7185. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00744

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00744 2021

  5. [5]

    Matthias Kahk and Johannes Lischner

    J. Matthias Kahk and Johannes Lischner. Combining the ∆-Self-Consistent-Field and GW Methods for Predicting Core Electron Binding Energies in Periodic Solids.J. Chem. Theory Comput., 19(11):3276– 3283, June 2023. ISSN 1549-9618, 1549-9626. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00121

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00121 2023

  6. [6]

    Hall, Benedikt P

    Samuel J. Hall, Benedikt P. Klein, and Reinhard J. Maurer. Characterizing Molecule–Metal Surface Chemistry with Ab Initio Simulation of X-ray Absorption and Photoemission Spectra.J. Phys. Chem. C, 127(4): 1870–1880, February 2023. ISSN 1932-7447, 1932-7455. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06996

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06996 2023

  7. [7]

    Identification of chemical species on plasma-treated polytetrafluoroethylene surface by ab-initio calculations of core-energy-level shift in X-ray photoelectron spectra

    Misa Nishino, Kouji Inagaki, Yoshitada Morikawa, Kazuya Yamamura, and Yuji Ohkubo. Identification of chemical species on plasma-treated polytetrafluoroethylene surface by ab-initio calculations of core-energy-level shift in X-ray photoelectron spectra. Applied Surface Science, 655:159369, May 2024. ISSN 01694332. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.159369

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.159369 2024

  8. [8]

    Kevin Carter-Fenk and John M. Herbert. State-Targeted Energy Projection: A Simple and Robust Approach to Orbital Relaxation of Non-Aufbau Self-Consistent Field Solutions.J. Chem. Theory Comput., 16(8):5067– 5082, August 2020. ISSN 1549-9618, 1549-9626. doi: 7 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00502

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00502 2020

  9. [9]

    Excited state dipole moments from ∆SCF: a benchmark.Phys

    Lukas Paetow and Johannes Neugebauer. Excited state dipole moments from ∆SCF: a benchmark.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 27(31):16354–16370, 2025. ISSN 1463- 9076, 1463-9084. doi:10.1039/D5CP01695A

    work page doi:10.1039/d5cp01695a 2025

  10. [10]

    Ethan Pollack, Rohan Maniar, and John P. Perdew. ∆SCF Excitation Energies up a Ladder of Ground-State Density Functionals.J. Phys. Chem. A, 129(47):11014– 11020, November 2025. ISSN 1089-5639, 1520-5215. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5c05336

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.5c05336 2025

  11. [11]

    P. S. Bagus. Self-Consistent-Field Wave Functions for Hole States of Some Ne-Like and Ar-Like Ions.Phys. Rev., 139(3A):A619–A634, August 1965. ISSN 0031- 899X. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.139.A619

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.139.a619 1965

  12. [12]

    Banna, R.J

    M.S. Banna, R.J. Key, and C.S. Ewig. Accurate core binding energies of ions from Dirac-Fock calculations combined with experimental atomic binding energies.Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 26(3):259–266, January 1982. ISSN 03682048. doi:10.1016/0368-2048(82)85033-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0368-2048(82)85033-0 1982

  13. [13]

    Triguero, O

    L. Triguero, O. Plashkevych, L.G.M. Pettersson, and H. ˚Agren. Separate state vs. transition state Kohn-Sham calculations of X-ray photoelectron binding energies and chemical shifts.Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 104(1-3):195–207, July 1999. ISSN 03682048. doi:10.1016/S0368-2048(99)00008-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0368-2048(99)00008-0 1999

  14. [14]

    Besley, Andrew T

    Nicholas A. Besley, Andrew T. B. Gilbert, and Peter M. W. Gill. Self-consistent-field calculations of core excited states.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 130 (12):124308, March 2009. ISSN 0021-9606, 1089-7690. doi:10.1063/1.3092928

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3092928 2009

  15. [15]

    Bagus, Eugene Ilton, and Connie J

    Paul S. Bagus, Eugene Ilton, and Connie J. Nelin. Extracting Chemical Information from XPS Spectra: A Perspective.Catal Lett, 148(7):1785–1802, July 2018. ISSN 1011-372X, 1572-879X. doi:10.1007/s10562-018- 2417-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10562-018- 2018

  16. [16]

    Matthias Kahk and Johannes Lischner

    J. Matthias Kahk and Johannes Lischner. Accurate absolute core-electron binding energies of molecules, solids, and surfaces from first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. Materials, 3(10):100801, October 2019. ISSN 2475-9953. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.100801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.100801 2019

  17. [17]

    Hait and M

    Diptarka Hait and Martin Head-Gordon. Highly Accurate Prediction of Core Spectra of Molecules at Density Functional Theory Cost: Attaining Sub- electronvolt Error from a Restricted Open-Shell Kohn–Sham Approach.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 11(3): 775–786, February 2020. ISSN 1948-7185, 1948-7185. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03661

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03661 2020

  18. [18]

    Matthias Kahk, Georg S

    J. Matthias Kahk, Georg S. Michelitsch, Reinhard J. Maurer, Karsten Reuter, and Johannes Lischner. Core Electron Binding Energies in Solids from Periodic All- Electron ∆-Self-Consistent-Field Calculations.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 12(38):9353–9359, September 2021. ISSN 1948-7185, 1948-7185. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02380

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02380 2021

  19. [19]

    The nuts and bolts of core-hole constrained ab initio simulation for K-shell x-ray photoemission and absorption spectra.J

    Benedikt P Klein, Samuel J Hall, and Reinhard J Maurer. The nuts and bolts of core-hole constrained ab initio simulation for K-shell x-ray photoemission and absorption spectra.J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 33(15): 154005, April 2021. ISSN 0953-8984, 1361-648X. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/abdf00

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/abdf00 2021

  20. [20]

    Nicholas A. Besley. Modeling of the spectroscopy of core electrons with density functional theory.WIREs Comput Mol Sci, 11(6):e1527, November 2021. ISSN 1759-0876, 1759-0884. doi:10.1002/wcms.1527

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1527 2021

  21. [21]

    Weitao Yang and Paul W. Ayers. Foundation for the ∆SCF Approach in Density Functional Theory, March

  22. [22]

    arXiv:2403.04604 [physics]

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    Performance of the TPSS Functional on Predicting Core Level Binding Energies of Main Group Elements Containing Molecules: A Good Choice for Molecules Adsorbed on Metal Surfaces.J

    No` elia Pueyo Bellafont, Francesc Vi˜ nes, and Francesc Illas. Performance of the TPSS Functional on Predicting Core Level Binding Energies of Main Group Elements Containing Molecules: A Good Choice for Molecules Adsorbed on Metal Surfaces.J. Chem. Theory Comput., 12(1):324–331, January 2016. ISSN 1549-9618, 1549-

    2016

  24. [24]

    doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00998

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00998

  25. [25]

    Haugen, Zheyue Yang, Katherine J

    Diptarka Hait, Eric A. Haugen, Zheyue Yang, Katherine J. Oosterbaan, Stephen R. Leone, and Martin Head-Gordon. Accurate prediction of core-level spectra of radicals at density functional theory cost via square gradient minimization and recoupling of mixed configurations.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 153 (13):134108, October 2020. ISSN 0021-9606, 1089-7...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0018833 2020

  26. [26]

    Caldas, Patrick Rinke, Volker Blum, and Matthias Scheffler

    Max Pinheiro, Marilia J. Caldas, Patrick Rinke, Volker Blum, and Matthias Scheffler. Length dependence of ionization potentials of transacetylenes: Internally consistent DFT/ G W approach.Phys. Rev. B, 92(19): 195134, November 2015. ISSN 1098-0121, 1550-235X. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.195134

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.195134 2015

  27. [27]

    Fabiano Corsetti and Arash A. Mostofi. System- size convergence of point defect properties: The case of the silicon vacancy.Phys. Rev. B, 84(3): 035209, July 2011. ISSN 1098-0121, 1550-235X. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.035209

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.035209 2011

  28. [28]

    n -type doping of CuIn Se 2 and CuGa Se 2

    Clas Persson, Yu-Jun Zhao, Stephan Lany, and Alex Zunger. n -type doping of CuIn Se 2 and CuGa Se 2. Phys. Rev. B, 72(3):035211, July 2005. ISSN 1098-0121, 1550-235X. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72.035211

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.035211 2005

  29. [29]

    Van Setten, and Patrick Rinke

    Dorothea Golze, Jan Wilhelm, Michiel J. Van Setten, and Patrick Rinke. Core-Level Binding Energies from GW: An Efficient Full-Frequency Approach within a Localized Basis.J. Chem. Theory Comput., 14(9):4856– 4869, September 2018. ISSN 1549-9618, 1549-9626. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00458

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00458 2018

  30. [30]

    Accurate Absolute and Relative Core-Level Binding Energies fromGW.J

    Dorothea Golze, Levi Keller, and Patrick Rinke. Accurate Absolute and Relative Core-Level Binding Energies fromGW.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 11(5):1840– 1847, March 2020. ISSN 1948-7185, 1948-7185. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03423

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03423 2020

  31. [31]

    Dorothea Golze, Markus Hirvensalo, Patricia Hern´ andez-Le´ on, Anja Aarva, Jarkko Etula, Toma Susi, Patrick Rinke, Tomi Laurila, and Miguel A. Caro. Accurate Computational Prediction of Core- Electron Binding Energies in Carbon-Based Materials: A Machine-Learning Model Combining Density- Functional Theory andGW.Chem. Mater., 34(14): 6240–6254, July 2022....

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c04279 2022

  32. [32]

    Benchmark of$\boldsymbol{GW}$ Methods for Core-Level Binding Energies, 2022

    Jiachen Li, Ye Jin, Patrick Rinke, Weitao Yang, and Dorothea Golze. Benchmark of$\boldsymbol{GW}$ Methods for Core-Level Binding Energies, 2022. Version Number: 1

    2022

  33. [33]

    Electron removal energies in noble- gas atoms up to 100 keV:Ab initioG W versus x- ray photoelectron spectroscopy.Phys

    Iskander Mukatayev, Benoˆ ıt Skl´ enard, Valerio Olevano, and Jing Li. Electron removal energies in noble- gas atoms up to 100 keV:Ab initioG W versus x- ray photoelectron spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. B, 106(8): L081125, August 2022. ISSN 2469-9950, 2469-9969. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.L081125. 8

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.l081125 2022

  34. [34]

    Matthias Kahk and Johannes Lischner

    J. Matthias Kahk and Johannes Lischner. Predicting core electron binding energies in elements of the first transition series using the ∆-self-consistent-field method. Faraday Discuss., 236:364–373, 2022. ISSN 1359-6640, 1364-5498. doi:10.1039/D1FD00103E

    work page doi:10.1039/d1fd00103e 2022

  35. [35]

    Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals.Computer Physics Communications, 180(11):2175–2196, November 2009

    Volker Blum, Ralf Gehrke, Felix Hanke, Paula Havu, Ville Havu, Xinguo Ren, Karsten Reuter, and Matthias Scheffler. Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals.Computer Physics Communications, 180(11):2175–2196, November 2009. ISSN 00104655. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.06.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.06.022 2009

  36. [36]

    Joseph W. Abbott, Carlos Mera Acosta, Alaa Akkoush, Alberto Ambrosetti, Viktor Atalla, Alexej Bagrets, J¨ org Behler, Daniel Berger, Bj¨ orn Bieniek, Jonas Bj¨ ork, Volker Blum, Saeed Bohloul, Connor L. Box, Nicholas Boyer, Danilo Simoes Brambila, Gabriel A. Bramley, Kyle R. Bryenton, Mar´ ıa Camarasa-G´ omez, Christian Carbogno, Fabio Caruso, Sucismita C...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Huhn, Mathias Jacquelin, Weile Jia, Bj¨ orn Lange, Lin Lin, Jianfeng Lu, Wenhui Mi, Ali Seifitokaldani, ´Alvaro V´ azquez-Mayagoitia, Chao Yang, Haizhao Yang, and Volker Blum

    Victor Wen-zhe Yu, Fabiano Corsetti, Alberto Garc´ ıa, William P. Huhn, Mathias Jacquelin, Weile Jia, Bj¨ orn Lange, Lin Lin, Jianfeng Lu, Wenhui Mi, Ali Seifitokaldani, ´Alvaro V´ azquez-Mayagoitia, Chao Yang, Haizhao Yang, and Volker Blum. ELSI: A unified software interface for Kohn–Sham electronic structure solvers.Computer Physics Communications, 222:...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.09.007 2018

  38. [38]

    V. Havu, V. Blum, P. Havu, and M. Scheffler. Efficient integration for all-electron electronic structure calculation using numeric basis functions.Journal of Computational Physics, 228(22):8367–8379, December

  39. [39]

    doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.08.008

    ISSN 00219991. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.08.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.08.008 2009

  40. [40]

    Jianwei Sun, Adrienn Ruzsinszky, and John P. Perdew. Strongly Constrained and Appropriately Normed Semilocal Density Functional.Phys. Rev. Lett., 115(3):036402, July 2015. ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.036402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.036402 2015

  41. [41]

    Strange, F.R

    R. Strange, F.R. Manby, and P.J. Knowles. Automatic code generation in density functional theory.Computer Physics Communications, 136(3):310–318, May 2001. ISSN 00104655. doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(01)00148-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(01)00148-5 2001

  42. [42]

    , series =

    Jorge Nocedal and Stephen J. Wright.Numerical Optimization. Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. Springer New York, 2006. ISBN 978-0-387-30303-1. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5 2006

  43. [43]

    C. G. Broyden. The Convergence of a Class of Double-rank Minimization Algorithms 1. General Considerations.IMA J Appl Math, 6(1):76–90, 1970. ISSN 0272-4960, 1464-3634. doi:10.1093/imamat/6.1.76

    work page doi:10.1093/imamat/6.1.76 1970

  44. [44]

    Fletcher

    R. Fletcher. A new approach to variable metric algorithms.The Computer Journal, 13(3):317–322, March 1970. ISSN 0010-4620, 1460-2067. doi: 10.1093/comjnl/13.3.317

    work page doi:10.1093/comjnl/13.3.317 1970

  45. [46]

    D. F. Shanno. Conditioning of quasi-Newton methods for function minimization.Math. Comp., 24(111):647–656,

  46. [47]

    doi:10.1090/S0025- 5718-1970-0274029-X

    ISSN 0025-5718, 1088-6842. doi:10.1090/S0025- 5718-1970-0274029-X

    work page doi:10.1090/s0025- 1970

  47. [48]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , author =

    Carlo Adamo and Vincenzo Barone. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 110(13):6158–6170, April 1999. ISSN 0021-9606, 1089-7690. doi:10.1063/1.478522

    work page doi:10.1063/1.478522 1999

  48. [50]

    Tailoring of arbitrary optical vector beams

    Igor Ying Zhang, Xinguo Ren, Patrick Rinke, Volker Blum, and Matthias Scheffler. Numeric atom-centered- orbital basis sets with valence-correlation consistency from H to Ar.New J. Phys., 15(12):123033, December 2013. ISSN 1367-2630. doi:10.1088/1367- 2630/15/12/123033

    work page doi:10.1088/1367- 2013

  49. [51]

    Gelius and K

    U. Gelius and K. Siegbahn. ESCA studies of molecular core and valence levels in the gas phase.Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc., 54:257, 1972. ISSN 0301-7249. doi: 10.1039/dc9725400257

    work page doi:10.1039/dc9725400257 1972

  50. [52]

    Yeh and I

    J.J. Yeh and I. Lindau. Atomic subshell photoionization cross sections and asymmetry parameters: 1≤Z≤ 103.Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 32(1):1– 155, January 1985. ISSN 0092640X. doi:10.1016/0092- 640X(85)90016-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0092- 1985

  51. [53]

    P¨ arna, R

    R. P¨ arna, R. Sankari, E. Kukk, E. N˜ ommiste, M. Valden, M. Lastusaari, K. Kooser, K. Kokko, M. Hirsim¨ aki, S. Urpelainen, P. Turunen, A. Kivim¨ aki, V. Pankratov, L. Reisberg, F. Hennies, H. Tarawneh, R. Nyholm, and M. Huttula. FinEstBeaMS – A wide-range Finnish- Estonian Beamline for Materials Science at the 1.5 GeV storage ring at the MAX IV Laborat...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2017.04.002 2017

  52. [54]

    Kuno Kooser, Antti Kivim¨ aki, Paavo Turunen, Rainer P¨ arna, Liis Reisberg, Marco Kirm, Mika Valden, Marko Huttula, and Edwin Kukk. Gas-phase endstation of electron, ion and coincidence spectroscopies for diluted samples at the FinEstBeAMS beamline of the MAX IV 1.5 GeV storage ring.J Synchrotron Rad, 27 (4):1080–1091, July 2020. ISSN 1600-5775. doi: 10....

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600577520007146 2020

  53. [55]

    Performance and characterization of the FinEstBeAMS beamline at the MAX IV Laboratory.J Synchrotron Rad, 28(5): 1620–1630, September 2021

    Kirill Chernenko, Antti Kivim¨ aki, Rainer P¨ arna, Weimin Wang, Rami Sankari, Mats Leandersson, Hamed Tarawneh, Vladimir Pankratov, Mati Kook, Edwin Kukk, Liis Reisberg, Samuli Urpelainen, Tanel K¨ a¨ ambre, Frank Siewert, Grzegorz Gwalt, Andrey Sokolov, Stephanie Lemke, Svyatoslav Alimov, Jeniffa Knedel, Oliver Kutz, Tino Seliger, Mika Valden, Mika Hirs...

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600577521006032 2021

  54. [56]

    Tavares, Simon C

    Pedro F. Tavares, Simon C. Leemann, Magnus Sj¨ ostr¨ om, and ˚Ake Andersson. The MAX IV storage ring project.J Synchrotron Rad, 21(5):862–877, September 2014. ISSN 1600-5775. doi:10.1107/S1600577514011503

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600577514011503 2014

  55. [57]

    Nils Martensson and Mikael Eriksson. The saga of MAX IV, the first multi-bend achromat synchrotron light source.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 907:97–104, November 2018. ISSN 01689002. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2018.03.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.03.018 2018

  56. [58]

    MAX IV Laboratory.Eur

    Aymeric Robert, Yngve Cerenius, Pedro Fernandes Tavares, Anna Hultin Stigenberg, Olof Karis, Ann- Christine Lloyd Whelan, Caroline Run´ eus, and Marjolein Thunnissen. MAX IV Laboratory.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 138(6):495, June 2023. ISSN 2190-5444. doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04018-w

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04018-w 2023

  57. [59]

    Near- threshold photoionization of the Ar 2p subshell.J

    L Avaldi, G Dawber, R Camilloni, G C King, M Roper, M R F Siggel, G Stefani, and M Zitnik. Near- threshold photoionization of the Ar 2p subshell.J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 27(17):3953–3966, September

  58. [60]

    QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open -source software project for quantum simulations of materials

    ISSN 0953-4075, 1361-6455. doi:10.1088/0953- 4075/27/17/019

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-

  59. [61]

    Jolly, K.D

    W.L. Jolly, K.D. Bomben, and C.J. Eyermann. Core-electron binding energies for gaseous atoms and molecules.Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 31 (3):433–493, November 1984. ISSN 0092640X. doi: 10.1016/0092-640X(84)90011-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0092-640x(84)90011-1 1984

  60. [62]

    Karlsson, L

    L. Karlsson, L. Mattsson, R. Jadrny, R. G. Albridge, S. Pinchas, T. Bergmark, and K. Siegbahn. Isotopic and vibronic coupling effects in the valence electron spectra of H2 16O, H2 18O, and D2 16O.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 62(12):4745–4752, June 1975. ISSN 0021-9606, 1089-7690. doi:10.1063/1.430423

    work page doi:10.1063/1.430423 1975

  61. [63]

    H. Bock. K. Kimura, S. Katsumata, Y. Achiba, T. Yamazaki and S. Iwata: Handbook of He Photoelectron Spectra of Fundamental Organic Molecules. Ionization Energies, Ab Initio Assignments, and Valence Electronic Structure for 200 Molecules. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo und Halstead Press, New York 1981. 268 Seiten, Preis:$39.95 oder£29.60.Ber Buns...

    work page doi:10.1002/bbpc.19820860324 1981

  62. [64]

    Jolly and Theodore F

    William L. Jolly and Theodore F. Schaaf. .pi.- Donor relaxation in the oxygen 1s ionization of carbonyl compounds.J. Am. Chem. Soc., 98(11):3178– 3181, May 1976. ISSN 0002-7863, 1520-5126. doi: 10.1021/ja00427a020

    work page doi:10.1021/ja00427a020 1976

  63. [66]

    Bakke, William L

    Albert A. Bakke, William L. Jolly, and Theodore F. Schaaf. A reversal of the usual binding energy-vs.- charge relationship. The carbon 1s binding energies of bis (cyclopentadienyl) metal complexes in the gas.Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 11 (3):339–342, January 1977. ISSN 03682048. doi: 10.1016/0368-2048(77)80009-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0368-2048(77)80009-1 1977

  64. [67]

    Allison, G

    D.A. Allison, G. Johansson, C.J. Allan, U. Gelius, H. Siegbahn, J. Allison, and K. Siegbahn. Molecular spectroscopy by means of ESCA.Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 1(3):269–283, January 1972. ISSN 03682048. doi:10.1016/0368- 2048(72)85016-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0368- 1972

  65. [68]

    Cavell and David A

    Ronald G. Cavell and David A. Allison. Site of protonation in aromatic and acyclic amines and acyclic amides revealed by N1s core level electron spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 99(12):4203–4204, June 1977. ISSN 0002-7863, 1520-5126. doi:10.1021/ja00454a072

    work page doi:10.1021/ja00454a072 1977

  66. [69]

    R. S. Brown and A. Tse. Determination of circumstances under which the correlation of core binding energy and gas-phase basicity or proton affinity breaks down.J. Am. 10 Chem. Soc., 102(16):5222–5226, July 1980. ISSN 0002- 7863, 1520-5126. doi:10.1021/ja00536a017

    work page doi:10.1021/ja00536a017 1980

  67. [70]

    Vibrationally resolved high- resolution NEXAFS and XPS spectra of phenanthrene and coronene.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 141 (4):044313, July 2014

    Giovanna Fronzoni, Oscar Baseggio, Mauro Stener, Weijie Hua, Guangjun Tian, Yi Luo, Barbara Apicella, Michela Alf´ e, Monica De Simone, Antti Kivim¨ aki, and Marcello Coreno. Vibrationally resolved high- resolution NEXAFS and XPS spectra of phenanthrene and coronene.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 141 (4):044313, July 2014. ISSN 0021-9606, 1089-7690. doi...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4891221 2014

  68. [71]

    Eyermann, William L

    Si Fen Xiang, Hsiang Wen Chen, Charles J. Eyermann, William L. Jolly, Steven P. Smit, Klaus H. Theopold, Robert G. Bergman, Wolfgang A. Herrmann, and Rowland Pettit. An x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of transition metal .mu.-methylene complexes and related compounds.Organometallics, 1(9):1200–1203, September 1982. ISSN 0276-7333, 1520-6041. doi: ...

    work page doi:10.1021/om00069a017 1982

  69. [72]

    Avanzino, Albert A

    Steven C. Avanzino, Albert A. Bakke, Hsiang-Wen Chen, Craig J. Donahue, William L. Jolly, Ting Ho Lee, and Antonio J. Ricco. Study of charge transfer in back- bonding to carbonyl and nitrosyl groups.Inorg. Chem., 19(7):1931–1936, July 1980. ISSN 0020-1669, 1520-510X. doi:10.1021/ic50209a022

    work page doi:10.1021/ic50209a022 1931

  70. [73]

    Chen, W.L

    H.-W. Chen, W.L. Jolly, S.-F. Xiang, I.S. Butler, and J. Sedman. An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of transition-metal thiocarbonyl and thionitrosyl complexes.Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 24(1):121–124, 1981. ISSN 03682048. doi: 10.1016/0368-2048(81)80051-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0368-2048(81)80051-5 1981

  71. [74]

    Calabro, John L

    David C. Calabro, John L. Hubbard, Charles H. Blevins, Andrew C. Campbell, and Dennis L. Lichtenberger. Effects of methyl group substitution on metal-coordinated cyclopentadienyl rings. Core and valence ionizations of methylated tricarbonyl(.eta.5- cyclopentadienyl)metal complexes.J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103(23):6839–6846, November 1981. ISSN 0002-7863, 1520-5...

    work page doi:10.1021/ja00413a010 1981

  72. [75]

    Rietz, Theodore F

    Richard R. Rietz, Theodore F. Schaaf, and William L. Jolly. An x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of volatile vanadium compounds.Inorg. Chem., 14(11): 2818–2821, November 1975. ISSN 0020-1669, 1520-510X. doi:10.1021/ic50153a044

    work page doi:10.1021/ic50153a044 1975

  73. [76]

    Supplementary data for ”Does the total energy difference method for modelling core level photoemission fail for bigger molecules?”, March 2026

    Marta Berholts, Tanel K¨ a¨ ambre, Arvo T˜ onisoo, Rainer P¨ arna, Vambola Kisand, and Juhan Matthias Kahk. Supplementary data for ”Does the total energy difference method for modelling core level photoemission fail for bigger molecules?”, March 2026. URLhttps://zenodo. org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.19256190

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.19256190 2026